Post on 19-Jul-2020
Miami
West Palm Beach
Orlando
Fort Lauderdale
Brevard
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
Final ReportMay 2016
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
Final Report
Prepared for:
Space Coast Transportation Planning Organization 2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way, Building B, Room 105
Melbourne, FL 32940
Prepared by:
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
225 E. Robinson Street, Suite 450 Orlando, FL 32801
Funding Provided by:
Canaveral Port Authority
445 Challenger Road, Suite 301 Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
May 2016
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
1 | P a g e
TableofContents
Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 2
All Aboard Florida’s Brightline Passenger Rail Service ....................................................................... 2
AAF/Brightline Infrastructure and Fixed Assets .................................................................... 3
Brightline Operating Characteristics ..................................................................................... 6
Opportunities for Brevard County ..................................................................................................... 8
Preferred Station Location Selection Process .................................................................................... 9
Station Location Criteria ........................................................................................................ 10
Station Location Evaluation Checklist ................................................................................... 10
Candidate Station Locations .................................................................................................. 12
Station Location Evaluation ................................................................................................... 14
All Aboard Florida Staff Review ............................................................................................. 16
Brevard County’s Transit Vision ......................................................................................................... 18
Commuter Rail Characteristics .............................................................................................. 21
Recommendations ............................................................................................................................. 22
Appendices
Appendix A: SCTPO Adopted Resolution 16‐14 ..................................................................... A‐1
Appendix B: Station Evaluation Form .................................................................................... B‐1
Appendix C: Submitted Station Location Checklists .............................................................. C‐1
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
2 | P a g e
Summary
All Aboard Florida is developing an express train service, called Brightline, that will provide direct
intercity travel beginning in 2017 between Miami and Orlando International Airport, one of the
most populous and visited regions in the United States. The train will run through part of Brevard
County using the existing Florida East Coast (FEC) Railway corridor between Miami and Cocoa, and
connect on new track along State Road 528 between Cocoa and Orlando. Current plans do not
include a station in Brevard County.
The Space Coast Transportation Planning Organization (SCTPO) identified this as an opportunity to
advance the County’s public transportation vision, as described in the TPO’s 2040 Long Range
Transportation Plan (LRTP) and 2016 Strategic Plan, and support the region’s economy and tourism
industries. TPO staff encouraged All Aboard Florida (AAF) to add a Brightline station in Brevard
County, which AAF declined to do at least during the initial phase of Brightline development. In
December, 2014 the SCTPO and the Canaveral Port Authority agreed to undertake a study to
identify a potential station location that would be supported by the various stakeholders in Brevard
County. The location(s) would be submitted to AAF for consideration.
The TPO worked with local municipalities in Brevard County to identify candidate locations and
evaluate their viability as a station for express passenger rail service. The TPO developed a station
evaluation form to help cities identify and assess potential locations and collect the information
needed to evaluate their feasibility. Local municipalities submitted nine candidate locations in total,
which were analyzed and ranked by the TPO using a set of evaluation criteria based on the viability
of the station to support AAF’s ridership and development goals.
Based on the analysis and review by AAF staff, the SCTPO endorsed station locations in the vicinity
of SR 528, US 1 and Clearlake Road and at the former Cocoa Passenger Station on US 1 and Rosa
Jones Blvd. AAF committed to assess the ridership, development potential and operational features
of the sites to determine the feasibility of the locations as a passenger rail station.
AllAboardFlorida'sBrightlinePassengerRailService
In March, 2012, All Aboard Florida announced a plan
to develop a privately funded passenger rail system
between Orlando International Airport and Miami,
with additional stations in Ft. Lauderdale and West
Palm Beach. Figure 1 shows the route of the $3.5
billion service proposed to begin in 2017. AAF
officials noted future extensions to Jacksonville and
Tampa will be considered.
Figure 1: Brightline route between Miami and Orlando International Airport
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
3 | P a g e
Brightline is noteworthy for two reasons. First, privately funded, for‐profit passenger rail has not
operated in the United States for the last 45 years. FEC halted passenger service in 1968. Second,
Brightline will operate at speeds up to 125 mph. Only the Amtrak Acela service in the northeast
corridor now reaches such speeds.
In August, 2015, the Federal Railroad Administration issued a "Finding of No Significant Impact" for
new track and bridges and train operation between West Palm Beach and Orlando, which includes
that part of the operation in Brevard County.
AAF/BrightlineInfrastructureandFixedAssets
All Aboard Florida (AAF) and the Florida East Coast Railway (FEC) are subsidiaries of Florida East
Coast Industries (FEC‐I). FEC will continue to operate freight rail service. AAF will operate the
passenger rail service called Brightline on a new, second track within the FEC rail corridor between
Miami and Cocoa. AAF will install new track along the south side of SR 528 between Cocoa and
Orlando International Airport.
Figure 2: All Aboard Florida route through Brevard County
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
4 | P a g e
The route through Brevard County (Figure 2) involves the existing FEC corridor parallel to US 1 as far
as the Cocoa Yard at US 1 and SR 528. Figure 3 shows the path the new AAF track will take in north
Cocoa. The new track will pass under SR 528 and over Industry Road.
Figure 3: Brightline route (red) through north Cocoa near SR 528 and US 1
Brightline train sets will be about 900 feet long and consist of two locomotives and seven passenger
cars. The trains will feature best‐in‐class innovation and technology such as low‐emission
locomotives and custom‐designed coaches optimized for passenger comfort. The locomotives will
be among the first in the country to feature Positive Train Control which enhances safety by
monitoring and controlling train speed, separation, grade crossing status and location. Cars will
feature Wi‐Fi, meeting space in business class and full ADA compatibility. Siemens, a world leader
in passenger train production, is manufacturing the train sets in Sacramento, Calif. The locomotives
and coaches are 100% American made.
1
528
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
5 | P a g e
Stations are planned for downtown Miami, Fort Lauderdale, and West Palm Beach with the
northern terminus at the Orlando International Airport South Intermodal Terminal Facility. AAF will
lease terminal and ticketing space from the Greater Orlando Aviation Authority. The Miami Station
will cover 35 acres in central Miami and include office, retail and residential uses.
The Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach stations (Figures 4 and 5) are of identical design and size
with a station building (30,000 sf), retail space (10,000 sf) and parking for 60 cars. The stations
feature transit/intermodal connectivity and proximity to attractions, public buildings and support
functions such as hotels. The station occupies about 4 acres. The boarding platform is on the west
side of the tracks. For safety, considerable attention is paid to separating passenger and freight
train activities. All stations feature distinctive V‐shaped exterior columns and bright, open interiors.
Figure 4: Rendering of West Palm Beach Brightline Station Phases 1 and 2
Figure 5: Rendering of West Palm Beach Brightline Station Phases 1 and 2
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
6 | P a g e
Figure 6: Rendering of West Palm Beach Brightline Station Phases 1 and 2
Figure 7: Site Plan Concept of West Palm Beach Brightline Station
BrightlineOperatingCharacteristics
AAF is developing the Brightline service to travel between Orlando and Miami in about three hours.
Driving the same distance requires about four hours; flying about three. AAF contends that travel
time can be more productive and relaxing by rail than by other modes. In general, autos are most
effective for travel less than 200 miles; flying is most effective for trips over 500 miles. Passenger
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
7 | P a g e
Figure 8: Market assessment for Brightline service
rail is best for trips between 200 and 500 miles. The Orlando to Miami via the east coast is within
the preferred rail trip range. Approximately 500 million trips are made between Central and South
Florida annually. The Brightline service, both infrastructure, rolling stock and operating
characteristics, are designed to attract as many of these trips as possible.
Brightline will operate 32 trains, 16 in each direction. Service will start at 6 AM and end at 9 PM
with hourly northbound and southbound headways. A station stop will last about five minutes
(dwell time). Trains will travel:
Up to 79 mph between Miami and West Palm Beach
Up to 110 mph between West Palm Beach and Cocoa
Up to 125 mph between Cocoa and Orlando
Maximum Allowable Speed is based on several factors such as curvature, signaling, track condition
and the number of grade crossings.
Brightline passenger trains will be faster and lighter than the freight trains that currently operate in
the existing rail corridor. Compared to freight trains, passenger trains will clear intersections in less
than a minute and produce less noise and
vibration.
Brightline service is designed for various trip
purposes. A profile of the anticipated market
characteristics for Brightline travelers is
provided in Figure 8. 75 percent of travelers
are expected to be families and leisure, with
25 percent traveling for business. Fares are
intended to be competitive with other travel
options. Ticketing will be offered on‐line and
follow the dynamic pricing model developed
for airline travel.
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
8 | P a g e
OpportunitiesforBrevardCounty
This section highlights the benefits of locating a Brightline passenger rail station in Brevard County.
All Aboard Florida’s planned route runs through Brevard County. However, AAF currently has no
plans for a station between Orlando and West Palm Beach, let alone Brevard County. Without a
station, the benefits of AAF to Brevard County will be minimal. All Aboard Florida is a for‐profit
venture. The justification for a station must be fundamentally economic. That is, a station in
Brevard must generate sufficient revenue in the profit centers of AAF's business model ‐‐ passenger
fares and ancillary development ‐‐ to exceed expenses. The following highlights aspects of Brevard
County that can bring additional business to AAF and, vice versa, station benefits for Brevard
residents and businesses. (Some estimation or subjectivity will be needed until an investment
grade passenger revenue study is conducted, which AAF has pledged to do.)
About 105 million persons visit Florida annually. Of that
total, about 65 million visit Orlando making it the most
visited city in the world. In addition to Orlando, visitors
(especially repeat visitors) often explore attractions
beyond the theme parks for which Orlando is
internationally known.
A ridership survey conducted by AAF showed that
availability of inter‐regional passenger rail service induces
greater visitor travel. 80 percent of respondents agreed
they would visit more cities on their trip than they'd
originally planned. Access to multiple locations along the
rail line means travelers can disburse to other areas where
they may not have been able to go during their trip.
Brevard has three attractions that annually draw 2 million or more national and international
visitors:
1. Kennedy Space Center Visitor Center is internationally recognized and one of the most
visited attractions in Florida.
2. Atlantic Ocean beaches stretch for 75 miles. Brevard’s beaches are closest to the Orlando
attractions.
3. Port Canaveral is the second busiest cruise port in the world. The Canaveral Port Authority
funded this study to look at how an AAF station could benefit the Port and vice versa.
Rapidly growing is eco‐tourism, based around the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Canaveral
National Seashore, the St Johns, Indian and Banana Rivers and the Atlantic Ocean.
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
9 | P a g e
Currently visitors often stay in Orlando area hotels and take day trips usually via auto to these
attractions. The appeal of the Brevard attractions could induce many passengers to use rail rather
than auto. Furthermore, visitors staying in south Florida could travel to and from the Kennedy
Space Center or a cruise from Port Canaveral via train rather than driving. Access to Brevard
attractions can increase the number of passengers using Brightline.
Approximately 500 million passenger trips take place annually between Orlando and south Florida.
AAF is seeking to capture but a fraction of those trips. It should also be noted that significant travel
occurs between Brevard and Volusia Counties and south Florida. A portion of these auto trips can
be captured by passenger rail. Business trips between Brevard's many high tech companies and
suppliers or customers in south Florida is another opportunity for passenger fare revenue.
A Brevard Brightline station will be designed for ancillary TOD (transit oriented development) as is
the case for all of AAF stations. The non‐rail activities at the station could be operated on a
franchise basis, not necessarily by AAF‐related firms as in Miami, Ft. Lauderdale and West Palm
Beach. For planning purposes, we are assuming a station design and size (40,000 sq. ft.)
comparable to the stations in West Palm Beach and Ft. Lauderdale.
AAF has publicly discussed the future opportunity of extending Brightline service to Jacksonville.
FEC‐I owns the tracks and right of way, so the cost would be relatively less than a completely new
rail alignment. The future north‐south passenger rail line between Jacksonville and Miami will
intersect the east‐west track to Orlando (and maybe Tampa) in north Cocoa. A transfer
station/regional passenger rail hub would be naturally located at the north‐south, east‐west
junction. This hub would be accessible by rail from all major population centers of the state and
could develop into a significant conference, convention, office, hotel complex. The hub will be
located in proximity to what is becoming the international center for commercial space activity.
Brevard will benefit by increased economic activity both at a station and associated with the
transportation services needed to move patrons from the station to destinations. More tourists
with an easy means to visit should translate into higher visitor numbers and perhaps more hotel
nights. An alternative travel method to Miami and Orlando International Airport will improve
convenience for Brevard residents. Finally, a Brightline station will further augment Brevard’s
already rich supply of internationally recognized transportation resources.
PreferredStationLocationSelectionProcess
The TPO developed a process to identify potential stations and select a preferred location for
recommendation to AAF:
1. Develop station evaluation criteria
2. Solicit candidate station locations from municipalities
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
10 | P a g e
3. Request criteria data from municipalities
4. Weight criteria and score locations
5. Review evaluation results with municipalities
6. Review evaluation results with AAF staff
7. Submit recommendations to Space Coast TPO and Canaveral Port Authority
Following this process, the TPO received nine candidate locations which were ranked in order of
how each performed based on the evaluation criteria. The following sections provide additional
detail about the station location evaluation and selection process.
StationLocationCriteriaSCTPO and Port Canaveral began in 2014 to consider opportunities to add a station along the AAF
alignment within Brevard County. Recognizing that AAF is a private entity, a potential station’s
viability depends on its ability to generate revenue for AAF, both through additional ridership and
development within and near the station location.
Development Potential – transportation investments like intercity rail service spur
economic development nearby, especially immediately adjacent to the station. For AAF,
higher potential for more intense development and redevelopment would translate to
potential economic returns for the AAF investment. This set of criteria evaluates specific
land use and transportation characteristics adjacent to the stations that can create optimum
conditions for high intensity development and result in maximum economic return for AAF’s
investment.
Potential Ridership – passenger demand for interregional rail depends on the number of
potential transit riders’ ability to access transit stations with ease and comfort. The closer a
station is to key origins and destinations, the more likely it is to attract them as customers.
For interregional passenger rail, close proximity to highways and ports increases the
accessibility and attractiveness of a Brevard County AAF station.
Operational Compatibility ‐‐ the station location must not interfere with the safety or
operation of passenger or freight trains. The station platform will be on the west side of the
right of way. The platform must extend along the entire length of the stopped train and
cannot block streets.
StationLocationEvaluationChecklistThe first step in the process was to identify the information needed to evaluate potential stations.
The TPO set out a series of evaluation criteria against which stations would be considered, ranging
from engineering requirements and logistics to land use compatibility. Criteria were divided into
two categories:
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
11 | P a g e
TIER 1, which are mandatory requirements any station location must exhibit; and
TIER 2, which are scoring variables that determine each station’s potential for generating ridership
and revenue.
The Tier 1 criteria for candidate station parcels are:
1. Adjacent to Florida East Coast (FEC) Railway – for the station location to serve the train it
must be physically adjacent to the tracks.
2. Passenger Loading Platform on West Side of Tracks – Brightline anticipates using the
westernmost rail line, so the loading platform will need to access trains from the west.
3. Straight Railway Section – a minimum 1,000 feet of tangent (straight line) railway track is
required for all the train cars to stop and allow passengers to board and alight.
4. Minimum 3 Acres in Size – station development sites must be at least 3 acres in size to
accommodate station activities, parking, circulation, and associated development.
5. Developable Land – the land must be largely free of wetland or floodplain impacts.
6. Utilities Available – the site must have access to electricity, water, sewer, and
telecommunications (including fiber optics).
7. Planning Compatibility – existing land use and zoning regulations must allow high‐density
development and building heights greater than three stories. The site area must also be
compatible with potential noise and lighting impacts of early morning and evening station
activity and station lighting.
Candidate station sites that met all of the Tier I criteria were advanced for consideration as a
potential station location and were then evaluated against the Tier 2 Evaluation Criteria.
Tier 2 criteria were organized into the primary functions of a Brightline station in Brevard County:
1. Is the parcel developable? Who owns the parcel, how large is it, and what is the
developable area?
2. What is the development potential? Is the station location site adjacent to developable
parcels? Are there developable parcels nearby?
3. How visible is the site? How many vehicles drive pass the location? How long is the street
frontage?
4. Are development incentives available? Do municipalities provide incentives for
development?
5. How would passengers access the station site? Does the parcel frontage allow for multiple
full access points? What is the available roadway capacity on the primary arterial serving the
parcel?
6. How well does the location serve Port Centers? What is the distance to Port Canaveral?
What is the distance to Melbourne International Airport?
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
12 | P a g e
7. How well does the location serve cultural destinations? What is the distance to the
Kennedy Space Center? How many tourist sites, historic districts, and arts districts are
within one mile of the site?
8. How well connected is the site to regional highways? What is the distance to the nearest I‐
95 or SR 528 interchange?
CandidateStationLocationsLocal municipalities in Brevard County nominated nine station location sites. For each location, the
governing municipality completed the Evaluation Form with the requested information, which was
then evaluated by the TPO. Four municipalities nominated locations: Palm Bay, Melbourne,
Rockledge, and Cocoa. The nine sites are listed below and illustrated in Figure 9.
1. Palm Bay (Robert J Conlon Boulevard NE)
2. Melbourne 1 (Main Street)
3. Melbourne 2 (Waverly Place)
4. Melbourne 3 (Apollo Boulevard)
5. Rockledge/Cocoa (Rosa L Jones Boulevard)
6. Cocoa 1 (Plaza Parkway)
7. Cocoa 2 (Michigan Avenue)
8. Cocoa 3 (Clearlake Road)
9. Cocoa 4 (Beau Geste Road)
The full submittal package for each station is provided in Appendix C – Submitted Station Location
Checklists.
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
13 | P a g e
Figure 9: Brightline Candidate Station Locations, Brevard County, Florida
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
14 | P a g e
StationLocationEvaluationTo evaluate the station locations, each criterion was weighted and scored. The categories were
normalized to provide an even comparison and then weighted according to station location
priorities determined through conversations with AAF. Each criterion was scaled to a 0 to 10 scale
to provide a comparison across categories. The weights and scoring factors are provided in Table 1.
Each of the nine candidate locations were evaluated against the criteria and scored. Once the
evaluations were complete, the TPO facilitated a meeting with representatives from each
municipality to explain the process and share the results of the analysis. The results of the analysis
are presented in Table 2.
Tier 2 Evaluation Criterion Maximum Value Normalized By Weight
Developable parcel size 10 acres Total acres / max size 20%
Acres of vacant parcels immediately adjacent to site
30 acres Total acres / max size 20%
Acres of vacant parcels within ¼-mile 120 acres Total acres / max size 15%
Distance to I-95 or SR 528 interchange 6.4 miles (Max distance – distance) / max distance 10%
Distance to Port Canaveral 30 miles (Max distance – distance) / max distance 10%
Distance to Melbourne International Airport 27 miles (Max distance – distance) / max distance 10%
Distance to Kennedy Space Center Visitor Center
45 miles (Max distance – distance) / max distance 5%
Daily traffic volume 52,630 vehicles/ day Daily traffic volume / max volume 5%
Linear feet of street frontage 2,500 feet Linear feet of frontage / max frontage 3%
Number of tourist sites within 1 mile 8 sites Tourist sites / max tourists sites 2%
Table 1: Station Location Criteria Calculations and Weights
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
15 | P a g e
Tier 2 Evaluation Criterion
Robert Conlon Blvd
Main Street
Waverly Place
Apollo Blvd
Rosa Jones Blvd
Plaza Pkwy
Michigan Ave
Clearlake Rd
Beau Geste Rd
Palm Bay Melbourne Melbourne Melbourne
Rockledge/ Cocoa Cocoa Cocoa Cocoa Cocoa
Developable Parcel Size
5 5 5 5 7 6 7 7 7
Vacant Parcels (immediate)
7.0 2.3 8.7 0.0 6.4 3.3 8.3 10.0 3.3
Vacant Parcels (¼ -mile)
10.0 4.1 4.3 2.8 1.0 1.9 1.7 2.5 1.7
Distance to I-95/SR 528
1.7 0.0 0.3 1.4 3.8 5.3 8.6 8.6 9.7
Distance to Canaveral
0.6 1.2 0.0 1.5 6.0 6.3 6.6 7.0 6.6
Distance to Melbourne Airport
7.6 8.9 9.2 9.6 2.6 1.5 1.1 0.7 0.0
Distance to KSC
0.0 0.4 1.8 0.9 5.9 6.3 6.5 6.4 6.4
Traffic volume
7.8 9.3 7.8 10.0 6.3 5.6 5.6 2.9 5.2
Frontage 6.7 6.0 2.3 5.8 1.9 7.2 3.2 1.4 10.0
Tourist Sites 0.0 2.5 10.0 1.3 6.3 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
Weighted Total 5.09 3.46 4.77 3.29 5.45 4.45 6.25 6.51 5.43
Table 2: Station Location Evaluation Results
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
16 | P a g e
Figure 10: The Clearlake Road station location in Cocoa, outlined in red, scored the highest against the evaluation criteria due to its strategic location and potential development opportunity.
Overall, the sites in Cocoa scored well, with the Clearlake Road location receiving the highest score.
The Clearlake Road station location includes several important features:
Good access to regional highways
Abundant developable land area
Considerable land already owned by All Aboard Florida
Relatively close to Port Canaveral
Located at future passenger rail junction, well suited for future expansion to Jacksonville
An aerial photo of the potential station site is provided in Figure 10.
AllAboardFloridaStaffReviewUpon completion of the draft location evaluations, TPO presented the study methodology and
findings to senior All Aboard Florida staff. AAF had not participated in the study in any manner.
While aware that it was underway, AAF provided no direction, information or preferences during
the study development. Therefore, TPO staff believed it prudent to advise AAF of the findings and
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
17 | P a g e
hear any feedback before presenting the conclusions in public to the Space Coast TPO and
Canaveral Port Authority.
AAF staff, overall, agreed with the study approach, evaluation factors, weighting and conclusions. It
was noted the highest scoring site on Clearlake Road in north Cocoa was rather isolated from other
related support facilities such as hotels, restaurants and attractions within walking distance, but the
site did offer the best access to Port Canaveral and the Kennedy Space Center and had good,
although somewhat indirect, road access to SR 528 and I‐95.
AAF staff expressed interest in the former FEC Railway passenger station site at US 1 and Rosa Jones
Blvd. that straddles the Cocoa/Rockledge city limits, one of the nine candidate locations submitted.
The station illustration (Figure 11) was prepared several years ago to show what an Amtrak station
at that site could look like. AAF staff cited the central city location similar to other Brightline station
sites that can provide attractions within walking distance of the station. The land is owned and now
being used by FEC Railway, which would have to be resolved. The station and most of the
developable land is on the east side of the tracks and Rosa Jones Blvd is close to the station building
all of which could present operational issues. However, AAF officials requested the TPO staff
present the Cocoa/Rockledge site to the TPO and Canaveral Port Authority for favorable
consideration.
Figure 11: Rendering of Possible Cocoa AMTRAK Station (2011)
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
18 | P a g e
BrevardCounty’sTransitVision
As the County looks into the future, this study also serves as a framework for introducing potential
future passenger rail transit in Brevard County.
The SCTPO 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan outlines a vision for premium transit in Brevard
County. The Plan identifies commuter rail as one of the premium transit services appropriate for the
County and outlines a vision for supporting transit service and directing future growth strategically
around this investment.
The vision for transit identified strategic corridors for commuter rail along US 1 and SR 528, as
illustrated in Figure 13. Premium transit service along the US 1 corridor expands travel mode
choices between Downtown Melbourne and Downtown Cocoa. The US 1 corridor, including both
the highway and FEC rail line, is the backbone for the region’s transit system plan. The plan
identifies several key opportunities along this corridor:
Regional commuter rail stops could be located at the County’s original rail stations in
Titusville, Cocoa, Eau Gallie, Melbourne, and Palm Bay.
Stations at Melbourne International Airport and the Space Coast Regional Airport in
Titusville.
Connectivity with the potential AAF hub in Cocoa with Port Canaveral and the Orlando
International Airport.
Rights of way along nearly the entire length of the alignment can accommodate three tracks
in the future.
The Plan also outlines a coordinated land use strategy to leverage a regional premium transit
investment. It emphasizes mixed‐use, higher density, and clustered developments in downtown
areas and near future transit centers. Transit oriented development (TOD) is fundamental to the
success of the multimodal and premium transit strategies. A few places in Brevard already have the
form and structure necessary to support premium transit, including downtown Titusville, Cocoa,
and Melbourne. For station areas identified outside these centers, the Plan recommends that
development intensities and patterns must fundamentally change to be supportive of premium
transit.
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
19 | P a g e
Figure 13: The vision for premium transit in Brevard County features strategic corridors
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
20 | P a g e
The Plan organized existing development and future growth within the framework of major
transportation corridors and mobility hubs. The mobility hubs include:
Intermodal hubs – includes urban core, traditional neighborhood, and multifamily
development types in and around the county’s space, air, and sea ports as well as existing
and planned rail and truck terminals.
Regional multimodal hubs – includes urban core and multifamily development in the
historical towns along the FEC
railroad and well as new larger
hubs where walking takes
priority and multiple travel
modes converge.
Multimodal hubs – includes
mobility hub, traditional
neighborhood and multifamily
development types in
walkable transit station areas
along multimodal corridors
with the intensity and mix of
land uses that support
premium transit.
These hubs represent the focus areas
for land use development and will
require enhanced transit service to
accommodate the growth. The hubs
are identified in Figure 14.
Figure 14: The vision for premium transit in Brevard County features mobility hubs
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
21 | P a g e
Likewise, the SCTPO Strategic Plan Priorities 2016 emphasizes the importance of regional transit.
Priority B1: Enhance connectivity for people, goods, and economic vitality calls on the TPO to
support rail transit and complete a passenger rail location study. Figure 15 shows the
implementation priorities for 2016.
Figure 15: Passenger rail service is among the SCTPO’s priorities for 2016.
Both the 2040 Plan and 2016 Priorities establish a framework for passenger rail service in Brevard
County. These planning studies inform decision‐making and prioritization for potential high speed
rail service in the County.
CommuterRailCharacteristicsCommuter rail service is characterized by medium‐haul distances (15 to 50 miles) connecting
suburban communities and employment centers with downtown areas. Service focuses on
commuters, with the highest frequencies during peak commuting hours. Stations are placed one to
five miles apart, with trains ranging from five to nine cars per train. It is quite different from the
inter‐regional express service proposed by All Aboard Florida.
Commuter rail stations in suburban areas are primarily accessed by park‐and‐ride. As stations move
into areas of greater density, greater numbers of riders arrive at the station by bus, walking, or
bicycling. Stations in urban areas may provide no parking and rely entirely on walk, bike, bus, or
taxis/drop‐off service (kiss and ride) for connections to the station.
Passenger Rail Station Location Study
22 | P a g e
The vision for passenger rail transportation in Brevard County relies on commuter rail. Commuter
rail stations will have different requirements from high speed rail service, which are oriented
towards longer inter‐regional trips and not typically serving commute trips. Commuter rail projects
are likely to be funded with public money (Federal, state, or local). Station location criteria for
commuter rail are likely to significantly consider economic development returns of the transit
investment, cost vs. benefits for each transit rider, and environmental benefits and impacts.
Brevard is part of the emerging Florida Megaregion and now among the ten most populous
urbanized regions in the country. Passenger rail, both inter‐regional high speed service and more
localized commuter rail, will likely play a significant role in the region's transportation future by
providing relief to increasingly congested roadways.
Recommendations
The station location study findings were presented to the Space Coast TPO Board on March 10,
2016 and to the Canaveral Port Authority Commission on March 23, 2016. The recommendations
are contained in SCTPO Resolution 16‐14 (Appendix A).
The SCTPO recommends locations along SR 528 near SR 524 and US 1 (Cocoa #3 and #4) as a
preferred site of a future inter‐regional express rail station location in Brevard County. These
locations offer great potential to generate ridership and ancillary development opportunities for
AAF. Its location at the intersection of US 1 and SR 528 provides ideal access to Port Canaveral and
the Port Canaveral Cruise Terminals, while positioning to serve the future Brightline expansion to
Jacksonville.
The SCTPO also recommends the former Cocoa passenger rail station site for redevelopment into a
Brightline station. That location offers proximity to an urban destination (Cocoa Village),
developable land and good access to Port Canaveral and the regional roadway network.
The SCTPO recognizes the information compiled on all submitted sites establishes a baseline for
future regional passenger rail planning. Station location sites evaluated through this process will be
retained for future consideration as commuter rail stations and to catalyze the growth of the
County’s mobility hubs. The results of these efforts will help improve multimodal connectivity and
mobility in the County to help support its economy and future growth.
Appendix A SCTPO Adopted Resolution 16‐24
Appendix B Passenger Rail Station Candidate Location Evaluation Form
Space Coast Transportation Planning Organization
Passenger Rail Station Candidate Location Evaluation
An intercity passenger rail station in Brevard County needs to meet the multiple objectives of attracting passengers and supporting ancillary development and investment. To serve these demands, the station must meet a set of feasibility criteria. All Aboard Florida (AAF) is under no obligation to include a station in Brevard County and will only do so if it makes good business sense for AAF.
This document outlines the criteria the Space Coat TPO will use to identify and prioritize candidate station locations. The criteria are divided into two tiers: Tier 1 criteria are required; and Tier 2 criteria will be used to evaluate and rank eligible locations. The following outlines the factors against which potential station locations will be assessed.
Tier 1: Parcel Requirements
1. Adjacent to FEC Railway – parcels must be adjacent to the AAF portion of the FEC Railway. AAF passenger trains will run on the west side of the tracks
2. Railway Tangent – stations must be adjacent to a tangent (straight line) section of track that is at least 1,000 feet long and contains no grade crossings or crossing that cannot be closed
3. Minimum Size – station sites must be at least 3 acres in size 4. Developable Land – station sites must not be in wetlands or floodplains 5. Utilities Available – access to electricity, water, sewer, and telecommunications (including fiber) 6. Planning Compatibility – zoning supports high density development and building heights greater
than 3 stories. Station site area compatible with early morning and evening activity and parking lot lighting
Tier 2: Evaluation Criteria
Based on these factors, the Space Coast TPO will assess potential sites that meet the minimum requirements according to a set of criteria. These evaluation criteria will help determine which locations have the most potential and warrant further analysis. The evaluation is organized into the two primary purposes of an AAF station in Brevard County:
Redevelopment Potential – transportation investments like intercity rail spur economic development nearby, especially immediately adjacent to the station. For AAF, high potential for higher intensity redevelopment would translate to potential returns for the AAF investment. Land use and transportation characteristics adjacent to the stations can create conditions better suited to realizing the full economic potential. Potential Ridership – passenger demand for intercity rail depends on its proximity to high concentrations of people and jobs and the ability to access destinations near the stations. The closer a station is to where people live and work, the more likely it is to attract them as customers. Likewise, close proximity to highways and ports increases the accessibility and attractiveness of a Brevard County AAF station.
All Aboard Florida Proposed Alignment
Station Location Evaluation Matrix The Space Coast TPO (TPO) will be working with each of the partner municipalities to conduct a preliminary assessment of potential sites. We are asking your help to conduct a self-evaluation of candidate sites within your municipality by filling out the information below and on the next page. Please attach a map of the candidate parcel. Provide any additional supporting documentation for each of the measures to help with the analysis.
In addition to the information provided in this document, the TPO will share relevant GIS data to help complete this assessment. If you have questions or need assistance with the analysis, TPO staff are available to help. Please contact XXXX XXXXXX at xxxxxxxxxx@brevardcounty.us or 321-690-6890.
Contact Information
Jurisdiction E-mail
Contact Name Phone
Number
Parcel Information
Parcel Location (tax parcel ID or address)
Notes:
Tier 1: Parcel Requirements
Yes No 1. Can the candidate location accommodate a platform on the west
side of the track(s)?
2. Is the candidate location adjacent to a minimum 1,000 foot tangent section of track?
3. Is the candidate location at least 3 acres in size?
4. Is the candidate location largely free of wetlands and flood plain impacts?
5. Is the candidate location close to all utilities (water, sewer, telecommunications, power)?
6. Is the candidate location compatible with area neighborhood?
Proceed to Tier 2 ONLY if all responses to Tier 1 are YES
Tier
2: E
valu
atio
n Cr
iteria
Cr
iterio
n Ev
alua
tion
Para
met
er
How
to M
easu
re
Resp
onse
Redevelopment Potential
7.De
velo
pabl
e pa
rcel
Si
tes o
wne
d by
FEC
pre
ferr
ed
List
all
owne
rs o
f can
dida
te p
arce
l(s)
Parc
el si
ze
Wha
t is t
he to
tal p
arce
l size
(acr
es)?
Deve
lopa
ble
parc
el si
ze
Wha
t is t
he to
tal d
evel
opab
le si
ze (a
cres
)?
8.De
velo
pmen
t po
tent
ial
Adja
cenc
y to
dev
elop
able
pa
rcel
s pre
ferr
ed
Acre
s of v
acan
t or u
nder
utili
zed
parc
els i
mm
edia
tely
adj
acen
t to
pro
pert
y (U
nder
utili
zed
parc
els h
ave
impr
oved
pro
pert
y va
lue
is le
ss th
an 4
0% o
f tot
al v
alue
)
Mos
t dev
elop
able
land
pr
efer
red
Acre
s of v
acan
t or u
nder
utili
zed
parc
els w
ithin
5-m
inut
e dr
ive
9.Vi
sibili
ty
Mos
t veh
icle
s pas
sing
site
pref
erre
d AA
DT o
f eac
h st
reet
with
acc
ess a
nd v
isibi
lity
to th
e sit
e
Site
s with
mor
e st
reet
fr
onta
ge w
ill b
e pr
efer
red
Line
ar fe
et o
f str
eet f
ront
age
10.I
ncen
tives
Si
te w
ith d
evel
opm
ent
ince
ntiv
es p
refe
rred
Ar
e th
ere
any
loca
l inc
entiv
es a
vaila
ble
(suc
h as
CRA
)? If
so,
plea
se li
st
Potential Ridership
11.L
ocal
stre
et
acce
ss
Site
s with
two
or m
ore
full
acce
ss d
rivew
ays p
refe
rred
Do
es th
e pa
rcel
fron
tage
allo
w fo
r mul
tiple
acc
ess p
oint
s?
Ye
s
No
Site
s nea
r roa
dway
s with
av
aila
ble
capa
city
pre
ferr
ed
Iden
tify
the
prim
ary
arte
rial r
oadw
ay(s
) use
d to
dire
ctly
acc
ess
the
parc
el
Wha
t is t
he L
evel
of S
ervi
ce?
Wha
t is t
he tr
affic
vol
ume?
12.A
cces
s to
Port
s Si
tes w
ithin
5 m
inut
es o
f the
Po
rt p
refe
rred
Di
stan
ce v
ia sh
orte
st ro
ute
to S
R 52
8 (B
each
line)
at S
R 40
1 in
terc
hang
e ne
ar P
ort C
anav
eral
Site
s with
in 5
min
utes
of
Airp
ort p
refe
rred
Di
stan
ce v
ia sh
orte
st ro
ute
to N
ASA
Blvd
at M
elbo
urne
In
tern
atio
nal A
irpor
t Ent
ranc
e Ro
ad
13.A
cces
s to
dest
inat
ions
Si
tes w
ithin
5 m
inut
es o
f the
Be
ach
pref
erre
d Di
stan
ce v
ia sh
orte
st ro
ute
to N
ASA
Caus
eway
at e
ntra
nce
road
to K
SC V
isito
r Cen
ter
14.A
cces
s to
regi
onal
hi
ghw
ays
Site
s with
in 5
min
utes
of a
n in
terc
hang
e pr
efer
red
Dist
ance
via
shor
test
rout
e to
nea
rest
I-95
or S
R 52
8 in
terc
hang
e (w
hich
ever
is c
lose
st)
15.
Are
ther
e an
y ot
her f
eatu
res o
f par
cel o
r pro
xim
ity
to a
feat
ure
that
cou
ld in
crea
se ri
ders
hip?
Appendix C Submitted Station Location Checklists
Site 1: Palm Bay-RJ Conlan
Site 1: Palm Bay-RJ Conlan
Site 1: Palm Bay-RJ Conlan
Site 1: Palm Bay-RJ Conlan
Site 1: Palm Bay-RJ Conlan
Station Location Evaluation Matrix The Space Coast TPO (TPO) will be working with each of the partner municipalities to conduct a preliminary assessment of potential sites. We are asking your help to conduct a self-evaluation of one to three candidate sites within your municipality by filling out the information below and on the next page. Please attach a map of the candidate parcel. Provide any additional supporting documentation for each of the measures to help with the analysis.
In addition to the information provided in this document, the TPO will also share relevant GIS data to help complete this assessment. If you have questions or need assistance with the analysis, TPO staff are available to help. Please contact Leigh Holt at Leigh.Holt@brevardcounty.us or 321-690-6890.
Contact Information
Jurisdiction E-mail
Contact Name Phone
Number
Parcel Information
Parcel Location (tax parcel ID or address)
Notes:
Tier 1: Parcel Requirements
Yes No 1. Can the candidate location accommodate a platform on the west
side of the track(s)?
2. Is the candidate location adjacent to a straight line of track at least 1,000 foot in length with no grade crossings (or crossings that cannot be closed)?
3. Is the candidate location at least three acres in size?
4. Is the candidate location largely free of wetlands and flood plain impacts?
5. Is the candidate location close to all utilities (water, sewer, telecommunications, power, fiber)?
6. Is the candidate location compatible with area neighborhood?
Proceed to Tier 2 ONLY if all responses to Tier 1 are YES
City of Melbourne slewis@melbourneflorida
Shannon Lewis 321-608-7200
Parcel 1 - Tax ID: 2824980 and Parcel 2 - Tax ID: 2824989, 2710 Main Street Melbourne FL 32901
The site (3.23 acres) is located in south Melbourne in the City's DowntownCommunity Redevelopment Area and is 225 feet away from US 1. Parcel 1 (2.68acres) is vacant and Parcel 2 (.55 acres) is the location of a park. The site hasover 1,800 feet of frontage along the west side of the FEC Railroad track.
■
■
■
■
■
■
Site 2: Melbourne-Main Street
Tier 2: Evaluation Criteria
Criterion Evaluation Parameter How to Measure Response
7. Developable parcel
Sites ownership List all owners of candidate parcel(s)
Parcel size What is the total parcel size (acres)?
Developable parcel size What is the total developable size (acres)?
8. Development potential Adjacency to developable parcels
Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels immediately adjacent to property (Underutilized parcels have improved property value less than 40% of total property value)
Proximity to developable land Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels within ¼-mile
Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels within ½-mile
9. Visibility Vehicles passing site Daily traffic volume of each street with access and visibility to the site
Sites with more street frontage Linear feet of street frontage
10. Incentives Development incentives available Are there any local incentives available? If so, please list
11. Local street access
Number of access driveways Does the parcel frontage allow for multiple full access points? Yes No
Vehicle capacity on nearby roadways
Identify the primary arterial roadway(s) used to directly access the parcel
What is the current roadway corridor Level of Service?
12. Access to Port Centers
Proximity to Canaveral Space Port Distance via shortest route to SR 528 (Beachline) at SR 401 interchange near Port Canaveral
Proximity to Melbourne International Airport
Distance via shortest route to NASA Blvd at Melbourne International Airport Entrance Road
13. Access to cultural destinations
Proximity to Kennedy Space Center
Distance via shortest route to NASA Causeway at entrance road to KSC Visitor Center
Proximity to cultural and recreational destinations
Number of tourist sites, historic districts, and arts districts within 1 mile (Refer to attached figure)
14. Access to regional highways Proximity to nearest interchange Distance via shortest route to nearest I-95 or SR 528
interchange (whichever is closest)
15. Are there any other features of parcel or proximity to a feature that could increase ridership?
Florida East Coast RR and City of Melbourne
3.23 acres
3.23 acres
7.04 acres
49.1 acres
76.7 acres
See attachment for AADT volumes
1,500 feet
See attachment■
US 1LOS C
26.1 miles
3.1 miles
43.0 miles
See attachment
6.4 milesLess than one mile to the Downtown Melbourne Entertainment District - 24 restaurants, 11bars/taverns, a microbrewery, and a proposed hotel. Also within 1.6 miles of Florida Tech (FIT).
Site 2: Melbourne-Main Street
Site 3: Melbourne-Waverly Place
Site 3: Melbourne-Waverly Place
Site 3: Melbourne-Waverly Place
Site 3: Melbourne-Waverly Place
Station Location Evaluation Matrix The Space Coast TPO (TPO) will be working with each of the partner municipalities to conduct a preliminary assessment of potential sites. We are asking your help to conduct a self-evaluation of one to three candidate sites within your municipality by filling out the information below and on the next page. Please attach a map of the candidate parcel. Provide any additional supporting documentation for each of the measures to help with the analysis.
In addition to the information provided in this document, the TPO will also share relevant GIS data to help complete this assessment. If you have questions or need assistance with the analysis, TPO staff are available to help. Please contact Leigh Holt at Leigh.Holt@brevardcounty.us or 321-690-6890.
Contact Information
Jurisdiction E-mail
Contact Name Phone
Number
Parcel Information
Parcel Location (tax parcel ID or address)
Notes:
Tier 1: Parcel Requirements
Yes No 1. Can the candidate location accommodate a platform on the west
side of the track(s)?
2. Is the candidate location adjacent to a straight line of track at least 1,000 foot in length with no grade crossings (or crossings that cannot be closed)?
3. Is the candidate location at least three acres in size?
4. Is the candidate location largely free of wetlands and flood plain impacts?
5. Is the candidate location close to all utilities (water, sewer, telecommunications, power, fiber)?
6. Is the candidate location compatible with area neighborhood?
Proceed to Tier 2 ONLY if all responses to Tier 1 are YES
City of Melbourne slewis@melbourneflorida
Shannon Lewis 321-608-7200
This 3.34 acre site is part of a much larger parcel owned by the Melbourne International Airport - Tax ID: 2728400
The site is located on property owned by the Melbourne International Airport. It is approximately onemile from the entrance to the terminal. This property has frontage on Apollo Boulevard and isconvenient to several other arterial roadways. The 4.30 acre parcel is currently vacant. The site hasover 1,240 feet of frontage along the west side of the FEC Railroad track. Additional vacant landowned by the Airport is located north and west of the subject site.
■
■
■
■
■
■
Site 4: Melbourne-Apollo Blvd.
Tier 2: Evaluation Criteria
Criterion Evaluation Parameter How to Measure Response
7. Developable parcel
Sites ownership List all owners of candidate parcel(s)
Parcel size What is the total parcel size (acres)?
Developable parcel size What is the total developable size (acres)?
8. Development potential Adjacency to developable parcels
Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels immediately adjacent to property (Underutilized parcels have improved property value less than 40% of total property value)
Proximity to developable land Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels within ¼-mile
Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels within ½-mile
9. Visibility Vehicles passing site Daily traffic volume of each street with access and visibility to the site
Sites with more street frontage Linear feet of street frontage
10. Incentives Development incentives available Are there any local incentives available? If so, please list
11. Local street access
Number of access driveways Does the parcel frontage allow for multiple full access points? Yes No
Vehicle capacity on nearby roadways
Identify the primary arterial roadway(s) used to directly access the parcel
What is the current roadway corridor Level of Service?
12. Access to Port Centers
Proximity to Canaveral Space Port Distance via shortest route to SR 528 (Beachline) at SR 401 interchange near Port Canaveral
Proximity to Melbourne International Airport
Distance via shortest route to NASA Blvd at Melbourne International Airport Entrance Road
13. Access to cultural destinations
Proximity to Kennedy Space Center
Distance via shortest route to NASA Causeway at entrance road to KSC Visitor Center
Proximity to cultural and recreational destinations
Number of tourist sites, historic districts, and arts districts within 1 mile (Refer to attached figure)
14. Access to regional highways Proximity to nearest interchange Distance via shortest route to nearest I-95 or SR 528
interchange (whichever is closest)
15. Are there any other features of parcel or proximity to a feature that could increase ridership?
Melbourne International Airport/City of Melbourne
4.30 acres
4.30 acres
See attachment
See attachment
See attachment
See attachment for AADT information
1,440 feet
See attachment■
Apollo BoulevardLOS C
25.1 miles
1.0 miles
41.1 miles
See attachment
5.5 milesOne mile to the Melbourne International Airport terminal area. In addition, less than three miles to the DowntownMelbourne Entertainment District - 24 restaurants, 11 bars/taverns, a microbrewery, and a proposed hotel.
Site 4: Melbourne-Apollo Blvd.
Station Location Evaluation Matrix The Space Coast TPO (TPO) will be working with each of the partner municipalities to conduct a preliminary assessment of potential sites. We are asking your help to conduct a self-evaluation of one to three candidate sites within your municipality by filling out the information below and on the next page. Please attach a map of the candidate parcel. Provide any additional supporting documentation for each of the measures to help with the analysis.
In addition to the information provided in this document, the TPO will also share relevant GIS data to help complete this assessment. If you have questions or need assistance with the analysis, TPO staff are available to help. Please contact Leigh Holt at Leigh.Holt@brevardcounty.us or 321-690-6890.
Contact Information
Jurisdiction E-mail
Contact Name Phone
Number
Parcel Information
Parcel Location (tax parcel ID or address)
Notes:
Tier 1: Parcel Requirements
Yes No 1. Can the candidate location accommodate a platform on the west
side of the track(s)?
2. Is the candidate location adjacent to a straight line of track at least 1,000 foot in length with no grade crossings (or crossings that cannot be closed)?
3. Is the candidate location at least three acres in size?
4. Is the candidate location largely free of wetlands and flood plain impacts?
5. Is the candidate location close to all utilities (water, sewer, telecommunications, power, fiber)?
6. Is the candidate location compatible with area neighborhood?
Proceed to Tier 2 ONLY if all responses to Tier 1 are YES
abernard@cityofrockledge.org
2425530, 2425529
City of Rockledge
Alix Bernard 321-690-3978
■
■
■
■
■
■
Site 5: Rockledge/Cocoa-Rosa L Jones
Tier 2: Evaluation Criteria
Criterion Evaluation Parameter How to Measure Response
7. Developable parcel
Sites ownership List all owners of candidate parcel(s)
Parcel size What is the total parcel size (acres)?
Developable parcel size What is the total developable size (acres)?
8. Development potential Adjacency to developable parcels
Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels immediately adjacent to property (Underutilized parcels have improved property value less than 40% of total property value)
Proximity to developable land Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels within ¼-mile
Acres of vacant or underutilized parcels within ½-mile
9. Visibility Vehicles passing site Daily traffic volume of each street with access and visibility to the site
Sites with more street frontage Linear feet of street frontage
10. Incentives Development incentives available Are there any local incentives available? If so, please list
11. Local street access
Number of access driveways Does the parcel frontage allow for multiple full access points? Yes No
Vehicle capacity on nearby roadways
Identify the primary arterial roadway(s) used to directly access the parcel
What is the current roadway corridor Level of Service?
12. Access to Port Centers
Proximity to Canaveral Space Port Distance via shortest route to SR 528 (Beachline) at SR 401 interchange near Port Canaveral
Proximity to Melbourne International Airport
Distance via shortest route to NASA Blvd at Melbourne International Airport Entrance Road
13. Access to cultural destinations
Proximity to Kennedy Space Center
Distance via shortest route to NASA Causeway at entrance road to KSC Visitor Center
Proximity to cultural and recreational destinations
Number of tourist sites, historic districts, and arts districts within 1 mile (Refer to attached figure)
14. Access to regional highways Proximity to nearest interchange Distance via shortest route to nearest I-95 or SR 528
interchange (whichever is closest)
15. Are there any other features of parcel or proximity to a feature that could increase ridership?
Florida Power & Light
32.97 acres
29.61 acres
4.19 acres (underutilized)
11.99 acres (underutilized)
10 acres (underutilized)
32,920475 Ft on Rosa L. Jones Dr.
Yes
■
US 1 to Rosa L Jones to Huntington Ln
B
17 minutes, 12 miles
30 minutes, 19 miles
32 minutes, 16 miles
5
I95 9 minutes 4.2 miles, SR 528 8 minutes 4 miles
This site is located 1 block south of SR 520, which also provides access to the port and Orlando.locating a station in the Center of the County makes easy access for all Brevard residents as well asbeing able to accommodate tourists going to the port and OIA Site 5: Rockledge/Cocoa-Rosa L Jones
Site 5: Rockledge/Cocoa-Rosa L Jones
Site 5: Rockledge/Cocoa-Rosa L Jones
Site 5: Rockledge/Cocoa-Rosa L Jones
Site 5: Rockledge/Cocoa-Rosa L Jones
Site 5: Rockledge/Cocoa-Rosa L Jones
Site 6: Cocoa-Plaza Parkway
Site 6: Cocoa-Plaza Parkway
Site 6: Cocoa-Plaza Parkway
Site 6: Cocoa-Plaza Parkway
Site 6: Cocoa-Plaza Parkway
Site 7: Cocoa-Michigan Avenue
Site 7: Cocoa-Michigan Avenue
Site 7: Cocoa-Michigan Avenue
Site 7: Cocoa-Michigan Avenue
Site 7: Cocoa-Michigan Avenue
Site 8: Cocoa-Clearlake Road
Site 8: Cocoa-Clearlake Road
Site 8: Cocoa-Clearlake Road
Site 8: Cocoa-Clearlake Road
Site 8: Cocoa-Clearlake Road
Site 9: Cocoa-Beau Geste Rd
Site 9: Cocoa-Beau Geste Rd
Site 9: Cocoa-Beau Geste Rd
Site 9: Cocoa-Beau Geste Rd
Site 9: Cocoa-Beau Geste Rd