Post on 01-Jul-2020
MENA New Energy 2017
Rioglass Solar Jeroen van Schijndel
1 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
Index
Rioglass Solar Introduction
CSP Industry - Status
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Examples
2 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
Index
Rioglass Solar Group Introduction
An impression of the CSP Industry Status
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Examples
3 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
Rioglass Solar Group Introduction
Founded in 2007 by a glass processing group with over 30 years of
experience
Over 35 years of glass processing experience
The world´s largest optical component supplier to the CSP industry
4 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
- 10
210
406
636
1,086
1,468
1,763
1,913 2,074
2,634
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD
2007: Rioglass Solar formed via
separation of parent company –
solar mirror and automotive
glass divisions
2008 First mirrors produced
at Rioglass Solar I
2009: Expansion of
Rioglass Solar II Plant in
Spain to increase capacity
2010: Award of largest
ever global CSP project
2011: Commissioning of new plant
in USA, doubling group sales
2012: Sale of minority
stake to VM Capital
and Partners Group
2013: South Africa plant opening.
Siemens receiver business acquired.
2014: Chile production
begins along with
incorporation of Riohuan
Chinese JV
2015: Acquisition of
Schott CSP business
(receivers)
2016: Chinese investment launched.
Cumulative MW(1)
Global Market Leader In Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) Technologies
Co
rpo
rate
Mile
sto
ne
s
2
5 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
Rioglass Solar Group Introduction
6 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
Direct Sales
Sales Offices
Production Sites
Headquarters Global Sunbelt
35oN
35oS
0o
Capacity: 600,000 mirrors p.a. Opening Year: 2013
Rioglass South Africa Ltd.
Capacity: 100,000 receivers p.a. Acquired: 2013
Rioglass Solar Systems Ltd.
Capacity: 250,000 facets p.a. Opening Year: 2014
Rioglass Solar Chile SpA
Capacity: 1,000,000 RP3 mirrors / 60,000 receivers p.a.
Under construction
Riohuan
Capacity: 100,000 receivers p.a. Acquired: 2016
Schott Solar S.L.
Capacity: 600,000 mirrors p.a. Acquired: 2008
Rioglass Solar I
Capacity: 700,000 mirrors p.a. Acquired: 2009
Rioglass Solar II
Capacity: 1,000,000 mirrors p.a. Opening Year: 2011
Rioglass Solar Inc.
Rioglass Solar Group Introduction
7 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
Client
Noor II (160MW) Shagaya (60 MW)
Ilanga (100 MW)
Delinhga (50 MW)
Kathu (100 MW) Atacama-1 (110 MW)
Wa’ad Al Shamal (50 MW)
Ashalim (110 MW)
Rioglass Solar Group Introduction
Parabolic Trough
Heliostat mirrors
Linear Fresnel
Parabolic dish
Concentrated PV (CPV)
8
Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
Rioglass Solar Group Introduction
Index
Rioglass Solar Introduction
An impression of the CSP Industry Status
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Examples
9 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
• 5 GW of operational installed base for CSP
vs
• 227 GW of PV
vs
• 433 GW of wind
Source: IEA (2016)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Solar Thermal PV Wind
GW Operational
CSP and offshore wind are in their deployment infancy, these technologies
are already attractive in some markets, with costs continuing to fall’
IRENA, June 2016
CSP Industry - Status
10 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
But CSP has added value….
CSP Industry - Status
“Their built-in storage capabilities allow
CSP plants to supply electricity on
demand”
IEA, 2014
“CSP offers a wide variety of ancillary services
that are becoming increasingly valuable as shares
of PV and wind, both variable renewables
increase in the electricity mix”
IEA, 2014
“The ability to shift generation to when the
sun is not shining and/or the ability to
maximize generation at peak demand
times allows CSP to have reduced LCOE”
IRENA, 2016
11 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
CSP Industry - Status
Estela Data
> 5GW operational installed base
> 23,700 GWh/year of electricity production worldwide
> 23,000 jobs created per year
12 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
An impression of the CSP Industry Status
CSP Industry - Status
13 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
The market for CSP is growing faster than that of any other renewable energy
source….
• Source: IEA 2016, one of the presented scenarios
• Needed: volumen and continuity
An impression of the CSP Industry Status
Source: IEA (2016)
14 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
The Economist - Letters Mar 11th 2017 Energy policies are increasingly and mistakenly geared towards expanding renewable energy as an end in itself,
rather than achieving carbon reductions and maintaining reliability. The cost of providing system
backup power or storage is not reflected in the wind and solar “levelised cost of energy” or the market price.
With more renewable production, these shadow costs escalate because a full-sized system of on demand
power or oversize seasonal storage (which does not practically exist today) is
needed to cover multiple days and weeks when there is little wind or sun. If it existed, this
storage system would face the same challenge that capacity markets face in a high renewables
world: large capital costs and low usage. High renewable penetration makes all
forms of energy production “intermittent” and therefore costly.
Most studies suggest that achieving a low carbon grid at a manageable cost will require a
mixture of nuclear, gas with carbon capture or other zero carbon on-demand sources in
addition to renewables. To redesign markets to facilitate very high uptake of renewable
energy for its own sake is indeed a way to turn the world, and economic logic, upside down.
JANE LONG ARMOND COHEN
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (ret.) Clean Air Task Force
Oakland, California Boston
CSP Industry - Status
The Economist - Letters Mar 11th 2017 Energy policies are increasingly and mistakenly geared towards expanding renewable energy as an end in itself,
rather than achieving carbon reductions and maintaining reliability. The cost of providing system
backup power or storage is not reflected in the wind and solar “levelised cost of energy” or the market price.
With more renewable production, these shadow costs escalate because a full-sized system of on demand
power or oversize seasonal storage (which does not practically exist today) is
needed to cover multiple days and weeks when there is little wind or sun. If it existed, this
storage system would face the same challenge that capacity markets face in a high renewables
world: large capital costs and low usage. High renewable penetration makes all
forms of energy production “intermittent” and therefore costly.
Most studies suggest that achieving a low carbon grid at a manageable cost will require a
mixture of nuclear, gas with carbon capture or other zero carbon on-demand sources in
addition to renewables. To redesign markets to facilitate very high uptake of renewable
energy for its own sake is indeed a way to turn the world, and economic logic, upside down.
JANE LONG ARMOND COHEN
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (ret.) Clean Air Task Force
Oakland, California Boston
15 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
The Economist - Letters Mar 11th 2017 Energy policies are increasingly and mistakenly geared towards expanding renewable energy as an end in itself,
rather than achieving carbon reductions and maintaining reliability. The cost of providing system
backup power or storage is not reflected in the wind and solar “levelised cost of energy” or the market price.
With more renewable production, these shadow costs escalate because a full-sized system of on demand
power or oversize seasonal storage (which does not practically exist today) is
needed to cover multiple days and weeks when there is little wind or sun. If it existed, this
storage system would face the same challenge that capacity markets face in a high renewables
world: large capital costs and low usage. High renewable penetration makes all
forms of energy production “intermittent” and therefore costly.
Most studies suggest that achieving a low carbon grid at a manageable cost will require a
mixture of nuclear, gas with carbon capture or other zero carbon on-demand sources in
addition to renewables. To redesign markets to facilitate very high uptake of renewable
energy for its own sake is indeed a way to turn the world, and economic logic, upside down.
JANE LONG ARMOND COHEN
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (ret.) Clean Air Task Force
Oakland, California Boston
An impression of the CSP Industry Status
The Economist - Letters Mar 11th 2017 Energy policies are increasingly and mistakenly geared towards expanding renewable energy as an end in itself,
rather than achieving carbon reductions and maintaining reliability. The cost of providing system
backup power or storage is not reflected in the wind and solar “levelised cost of energy” or the market price.
With more renewable production, these shadow costs escalate because a full-sized system of on demand
power or oversize seasonal storage (which does not practically exist today) is
needed to cover multiple days and weeks when there is little wind or sun. If it existed, this
storage system would face the same challenge that capacity markets face in a high renewables
world: large capital costs and low usage. High renewable penetration makes all
forms of energy production “intermittent” and therefore costly.
Most studies suggest that achieving a low carbon grid at a manageable cost will require a
mixture of nuclear, gas with carbon capture or other zero carbon on-demand sources in
addition to renewables. To redesign markets to facilitate very high uptake of renewable
energy for its own sake is indeed a way to turn the world, and economic logic, upside down.
JANE LONG ARMOND COHEN
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (ret.) Clean Air Task Force
Oakland, California Boston
16 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
UAE
The Gulf state plans to invest £119bn ($150bn) in renewable power to 2050,
weaning the country from dependency on subsidized natural gas power in
stages, Minister of Energy Suhail Al-Mazrouei (UAE) said at a conference in
Berlin. Clean energy sources will help it save £153bn ($192bn), he said.
An impression of the CSP Industry Status
17 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
And cost will go down fast the coming years….
PTC and ST total installed cost reduction potential by source, 2015-2025
An impression of the CSP Industry Status
18 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
Index
Rioglass Solar Introduction
An impression of the CSP Industry Status
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Examples
19 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
UVAC-X Coating for HCE Tubes
• Product introduction November 2016
• Provides a non-degradable coating
• Proven result confirmed by DLR measurements
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Product Examples
20 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
UVAC 6G and 7G
The unrivaled benchmark in solar receiver efficiency achieved by increasing
absorbtance without compromising on emissivity
The efficiency of the receiver has the single most important impact on plant’s efficiency
The design of the receiver is crucial for its performance. It must strike a perfect balance between thermal energy absorption and energy loss
Absorption of all receivers in the
market degrade over time (physical characteristics of the SST selective coating)
On average, ~1.3% less GWh produced annually throughout plant’s lifetime!
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Product Examples
UVAC-X Coating for HCE Tubes - Introduction
21 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
0.96
0.965
0.97
0.975
0.98
0.985
0.99
0.995
1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
% d
egra
dat
ion
Years
Receiver degradation
Standard Coating Degradation
Expected lifetime of a receiver
~3% degradation over lifetime
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Product Examples
UVAC-X Coating for HCE Tubes – Standard Receiver Coating Degradation
22 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
+ ~150 GWh of additional electricity over 25 year! + ~30M EUR of additional revenue over 25 years!
What if you could gain back all those lost GWs of electricity production?
For a standard 100MW project with TES that would mean:
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Product Examples
UVAC-X Coating for HCE Tubes – Coating Degradation
23 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
• The “Game Changer” for Solar Thermal Receivers
• Non Degradable coating over receiver lifetime
0.96
0.965
0.97
0.975
0.98
0.985
0.99
0.995
1
1.005
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
% d
egra
dat
ion
Years
Receiver degradation
Standard Coating Degradation UVAC X degradation
Expected lifetime of a receiver
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Product Examples
UVAC-X Coating for HCE Tubes – Coating Degradation
24 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
Simulating a standard 100 MW plant with 1,000MWht (~4hrs) MS storage:
Benefit With UVAC X With Standard HCE*
+150 GWh 11,300 GWh 11,150 GWh Total Output to grid over 25 years
+6 GWh 451 GWh 445 GWh Avg. Output to grid per year
-3% 330 340 # of loops
~€30M Total additional revenues
~€7M Total SF Erection and O&M savings for project
• Less SF Loops! • Better degradation warranty! • Increased output to grid over 25 years!
* High end, bankable HCE such as the UVAC 6G/7G or PTR-70
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Product Examples
UVAC-X Coating for HCE Tubes – The Numbers!
25 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Product Examples
UVAC-X Coating for HCE Tubes – Simulation UVAC X Impact for standard 100MW Project
26 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
Full product aging test at DLR show no degradation over product’s lifetime!
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Product Examples
27 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
• No degradation of optical efficiency and heat losses over entire product’s lifetime!
• Higher value by reducing erection and O&M costs and/or increasing output to grid!
• Robust validation process ensures long lasting performance!
• UVAC X coating can be tailor made for specific optical requirements and diameter.
Receivers providing most value to our customer!
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Product Examples
UVAC-X Coating for HCE Tubes – Summary
28 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Product Examples
Rioglass PTR® 70 5G Advanced - High Temperature Receiver
SCHOTT PTR®770-4G
2nd Gen 3rd Gen 1st Gen
400°C 550°C
2008 2011 2006 2013 2015+
+ 2.9% plant
efficiency
+ 1.0% plant
efficiency
+ life time extended
+ improved robustness
high temperature
(550°C)
SCHOTT PTR® 70-5GAdvanced
“In 2025 the installed costs of the storage medium (per kWh-thermal) for a PTC
system using molten salt as an HTF are around 50% lower compared to the
2015 reference.” (IRENA -THE POWER TO CHANGE, June 2016) 29
Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
• Rioglass Solar Receivers ready for High Temperature applications
• Tested at several pilot and test plants
• Molten Salt as well as other types of high T HTFs
• New components, new design based on CTE effects, new coating!
• Alpha and epsilon are tunable within margins to reach optimum
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Product Examples
Rioglass PTR® 70 5G Advanced - High Temperature Receiver
30 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Product Examples
Rioglass PTR® 70 5G Advanced - High Temperature Receiver
LT HT+
HTF temperature ≤ 400°C ≤ 560°C
optical parameters α: 95.5 % ε400: 9.5 % α: 94.0 % ε400: 7.4 %
aperture **** 96.1% 96.6%
steel tube material Temperature durable High-temp durable
bellow material High-temp durable
31 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Product Examples
Rioglass PTR® 70 5G Advanced - High Temperature Receiver
SolarPaces 2013
32 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
• Rioglass Solar References for Molten Salts • Schott Solar test bench 2015
• ENEL´s Priolo Gargallo, Sicily, 50% of solar field 2012
• Sandía Labs, NM 2012
• HPS Project, Siemens 2013
• Test Loop Manchasol 2012
Innovations at Rioglass Solar - Two Product Examples
Rioglass PTR® 70 5G Advanced - High Temperature Receiver
33 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
Rioglass Solar - Uncompromising and continuous commitment to our customers
Investment in maximizing efficiencies in the production process and thus creating
value to our customers
Continuous investment in developing cutting edge solutions to drive efficiencies
up while reducing costs
INNOVATION – THE KEY TO INCREASING VALUE
34 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.
TOGETHER WE PROVIDE CLEAN SOLAR ENERGY
THANK YOU
35 Rioglass 2017 © All rights reserved.