Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

Post on 06-Jan-2016

49 views 0 download

description

Managing for Development Results (MfDR). Farzana Ahmed Principal Results Management Specialist Asian Development Bank Singapore May 2011. Presentation Topics. Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

1APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Managing for Development Results

(MfDR) Farzana AhmedFarzana Ahmed

Principal Results Management SpecialistPrincipal Results Management SpecialistAsian Development BankAsian Development Bank

SingaporeSingaporeMay 2011May 2011

2APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR Pilots

Presentation Topics

3APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Plan

Public Sector Management Cycle

Allocate ResourcesImplementMonitorEvaluate

National Development

Plan

National Budget

ImplementationNational

Monitoring

National Evaluation

Sector Development

Plan

Sector Budget

Sector Program Implementation

Sector Performance Monitoring

Sector Performance

Evaluation

MANAGEMENT

4APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR Pilots

Topics

5APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Making PSM Results-Based

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

PLAN FOR RESULTS• Results /activities

defined• Indicators, targets

BUDGET FOR RESULTS• Budget aligned with

plan

IMPLEMENT FOR RESULTS• People• Policies• Processes

MONITOR RESULTS• Linked to planning• How & who• Data, reporting

EVALUATE RESULTS• How & who• Dissemination,

feedbackResultsResults

6APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

6

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Core Results Attributes

7APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Horizontal and Vertical Integration

Focus on Common Results

Inter-dependent PSM components

Informed Decisions Continuous Learning

Core Results Attributes

Key FeaturesPlan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

ResultsResults

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

8APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR Pilots

Topics

9APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

9

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Core Results Attributes

10APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Capacity Development

GoalsGoals

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

1. Assess gaps

2. Identify constraints

3. Develop actions

Country Planning System

11APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Senior Government Officials as change agents

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

1. Assess gaps

2. Identify constraints

3. Develop plans

Country system

Drive Process

Drive Process

12APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR Pilots

Topics

13APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Asia-Pacific CoP on MfDR

ADB(Secretariat)

Onlookers

Active Members

CoordinatingCommittee

DevelopmentPartners

14APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Modes of Activities

• Virtual Learning

• Face to Face

15APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

Define core attributes

Share good practices

South –South dialogueDialogue with Donors

Regional Level- APCoP members;

16APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Country Level:APCoP members as change agents

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

1. Assess gaps

2. Identify constraints

3. Develop plans

Country system

Drive Process

Drive Process

17APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR Pilots

Topics

18APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Horizontal and Vertical Integration

Focus on Common Results

Inter-dependent PSM components

Core Results Attributes

IndonesiaPlan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

ResultsResults

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

StrongStrong

ModerateModerate

19APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Horizontal and Vertical Integration

Focus on Common Results

Inter-dependent PSM components

Core Results Attributes

PhilippinesPlan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

ResultsResults

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

StrongStrong

ModerateModerate

20APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Horizontal and Vertical Integration

Focus on Common Results

Inter-dependent PSM components

Core Results Attributes

KoreaPlan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

ResultsResults

PlanningDirectionsMTEF

StrongStrong

ModerateModerate

21APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

21

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Pilot Study – Philippines

22APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

22

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Pilot Study – Bangladesh

23APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

23

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Pilot Study : Cambodia Rural Development Sector

24APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

24

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Pilot Study : Bhutan – Transport Sector

25APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Thank You!