Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

25
1 APCOP- APCOP- MfDR MfDR Managing for Development Results (MfDR) Farzana Ahmed Farzana Ahmed Principal Results Management Specialist Principal Results Management Specialist Asian Development Bank Asian Development Bank Singapore Singapore May 2011 May 2011

description

Managing for Development Results (MfDR). Farzana Ahmed Principal Results Management Specialist Asian Development Bank Singapore May 2011. Presentation Topics. Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

Page 1: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

1APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Managing for Development Results

(MfDR) Farzana AhmedFarzana Ahmed

Principal Results Management SpecialistPrincipal Results Management SpecialistAsian Development BankAsian Development Bank

SingaporeSingaporeMay 2011May 2011

Page 2: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

2APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR Pilots

Presentation Topics

Page 3: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

3APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Plan

Public Sector Management Cycle

Allocate ResourcesImplementMonitorEvaluate

National Development

Plan

National Budget

ImplementationNational

Monitoring

National Evaluation

Sector Development

Plan

Sector Budget

Sector Program Implementation

Sector Performance Monitoring

Sector Performance

Evaluation

MANAGEMENT

Page 4: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

4APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR Pilots

Topics

Page 5: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

5APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Making PSM Results-Based

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

PLAN FOR RESULTS• Results /activities

defined• Indicators, targets

BUDGET FOR RESULTS• Budget aligned with

plan

IMPLEMENT FOR RESULTS• People• Policies• Processes

MONITOR RESULTS• Linked to planning• How & who• Data, reporting

EVALUATE RESULTS• How & who• Dissemination,

feedbackResultsResults

Page 6: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

6APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

6

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Core Results Attributes

Page 7: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

7APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Horizontal and Vertical Integration

Focus on Common Results

Inter-dependent PSM components

Informed Decisions Continuous Learning

Core Results Attributes

Key FeaturesPlan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

ResultsResults

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

Page 8: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

8APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR Pilots

Topics

Page 9: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

9APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

9

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Core Results Attributes

Page 10: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

10APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Capacity Development

GoalsGoals

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

1. Assess gaps

2. Identify constraints

3. Develop actions

Country Planning System

Page 11: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

11APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Senior Government Officials as change agents

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

1. Assess gaps

2. Identify constraints

3. Develop plans

Country system

Drive Process

Drive Process

Page 12: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

12APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR Pilots

Topics

Page 13: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

13APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Asia-Pacific CoP on MfDR

ADB(Secretariat)

Onlookers

Active Members

CoordinatingCommittee

DevelopmentPartners

Page 14: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

14APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Modes of Activities

• Virtual Learning

• Face to Face

Page 15: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

15APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

Define core attributes

Share good practices

South –South dialogueDialogue with Donors

Regional Level- APCoP members;

Page 16: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

16APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Country Level:APCoP members as change agents

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

1. Assess gaps

2. Identify constraints

3. Develop plans

Country system

Drive Process

Drive Process

Page 17: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

17APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR Pilots

Topics

Page 18: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

18APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Horizontal and Vertical Integration

Focus on Common Results

Inter-dependent PSM components

Core Results Attributes

IndonesiaPlan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

ResultsResults

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

StrongStrong

ModerateModerate

Page 19: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

19APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Horizontal and Vertical Integration

Focus on Common Results

Inter-dependent PSM components

Core Results Attributes

PhilippinesPlan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

ResultsResults

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

StrongStrong

ModerateModerate

Page 20: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

20APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Horizontal and Vertical Integration

Focus on Common Results

Inter-dependent PSM components

Core Results Attributes

KoreaPlan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

ResultsResults

PlanningDirectionsMTEF

StrongStrong

ModerateModerate

Page 21: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

21APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

21

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Pilot Study – Philippines

Page 22: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

22APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

22

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Pilot Study – Bangladesh

Page 23: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

23APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

23

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Pilot Study : Cambodia Rural Development Sector

Page 24: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

24APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

24

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Pilot Study : Bhutan – Transport Sector

Page 25: Managing for Development Results (MfDR)

25APCOP-APCOP-MfDRMfDR

Thank You!