Post on 02-Dec-2018
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: _______ SDG:._ _________
VOA/SY/Pest/PCB
COMPLETE SDG FILE (CSF) AUDIT
Organic Fractions: - - -------- -----
Missing Jnformation Date Lab Contacted Date Received
Validator: ________ Date: _ ____
1/13
EPA-NE - Data Validation VOA/SV /Pest/PCB-I
Case: _ ________ _ SDG: _ _ _ ___ _ _
Company: _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ Contacted: Yes No Date:-- --- ----Sampler:-------
I. PRES ER VATION AND HOLDING TIMES - Circle sample numbers with exceeded technical holding times or omitted preservation. List all required preservation codes and circle omitted preservation codes. Circle all exceeded technical holding times. Identify extraction technique after"# ofDays"/(*Extraction Code).
VOA BNA PEST/PCB
Sample No. (TR No.)
Matrix Pres. Code
Date Sampled
Date Analyzed
# of Days from
Sampling to
Analysis
Action Date
Extracted
# of Days from
Sampling to Extr./(•)
Date Analyzed
# of Days from
Sampling to Anal.
Action Date
Extracted
fl ofDays from
Sampling to
Extri.(• )
Date Analyzed
# of Days from
Sampling to Anal.
Action
Preservation Code: (*Extraction Code:) Action Code: LIL - Liquid/Liquid J - Estimate (J) Detected Values I. Cool @ 4°C (± 2°)
2. Preserve with HCI to at least pH 2 SON - Sonication UJ - Estimate (UJ) Non-Detected Values SEP - Separatory Funnel R - Reject (R) Non-Detected Values 3. Protect from light
4. Freeze SOX - Soxhlet 5. Room Temperature (Avoid excessive heat) SPE • Solid Phase Extraction
Date: Validator: - - - - - - -------
1/13
--- - - --- - --- - -- --- - ---
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:________ _ _
VOA/SV-II-A II A. GC/MS INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK - (TUNING) Note: NOT for Selected Ion Monitoring (SIM) Analysis
formance Checks that are outside method QC · · ·-· - --- ---,
VOA Instrument Performance Check (Compound Name)
Analysis Date and
T ime
Instrument Ions Affected
Percent Relative
Abundance
QC Limits Samples Affected Action
Comments:
SV Instrument Performance Check (Compound Name)
Analysis Date and
Time
Instrument Ions Affected
Percent Relative
Abundance
QC Limits Samples Affected Action
Comments:
If tuning compounds and criteria are different from those specified in CLP SOW SOMO 1.2, the validator should include a copy of the method-specific tuning criteria with this worksheet.
Validator: Date:
1/13
- -----
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:_ _ ________ VOA/SV-11-B II B. GC/MS INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK - 12-hour clock
.b .List all I Perf< Ch di d h db d the 12-h..., ....... .-1,..1 ...... . - .......... -.
Fraction Tune Standard Injection Time
(VOA orSV) or CCV ID Date and Time Elapsed Samples Affected Action (hours)
Validator:_ _ _____ _ _____ _ Date:1/13
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG: _ _ ___ ___ _
Pest/PCB-II-A I .'dII A. GC/ECD INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK List all h -- ----- -- - -- -- -
RCM (Section II) Dateffime Instr. Column Compound % Resolution Samples Affected Action
I PEM (Section II and IV) I I I I I I I I
I1NDA & B (Section Ill) I . I I I I I I I
I INDA & B (Section IV) I I I I I I I I
Date: _______Validator: _ ___ _ ___ ___ ___
1/13
--- ---------- -- ------ -
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:_____ ___ _ _
Pest/PCB-11-B II B. GC/ECD INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK - Retention Times - List all analvtes that exceed retention time criteria
PEM (Section II and IV) Dateffime Instr. Column Compound RT Window RT Samples Affected Action
I INDA & B (Section IV) I I I I I I I I I
Validator: Date:
1/13
- ----- -------- ---- ---
EPA NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:_ _ ___ ______
Pest/PCB-11-C II C. GC/ECD INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE CHECK - Accuracy Check of Initial Calibration
List all analytes that are outside the %0 criteria ·
PEM Sample ID Date/Time Instr. Column Comoound %0 Samples Affected Action
Date:Validator:~
1/13
- --
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case:______ _ _ SDG:______ ___ Pest/PCB-11-D
d ,• -II D. GC/ECD 0 -- ---- -- - ----- -- - _.'"" -- --- --- ... --- - - ------. _
PEM (Section lI) Date/Time Instr. Column DDT, % DOD, DOE, Endrin Samples Affected Action Endrin, or Breakdown ketone, Endrin Combined a ldehvde Present
IPEM (Section IV) I I I I I I I I I
Validator: _ _ _____ ________ Date:---
1/13
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case:________ SDG:_ ________ Pest/PCB-III
INDA/INDB, RecalculatedINDC, Date Instrument Column Analytes
or Multicomponent RT Window
IA. % RSD Linearit~
IB. Retention T ime Windows
·%RS0 Samples Affected Action
I
I
Did the laboratory follow the correct analytical sequence? y N
Did the laboratory analyze the initial calibration at the appropriate concentration levels? y N
Validator:_ _ _ ____ _ _ Date: ---- -
1/13
- - ----- - - - - - ----
Date of ICAL Instrument Fraction Matrix Compound %RSD RRF* Samples Affected Action (Detect/ND)
Comments:
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:___ _ ______
VOA/SV-III III. INITIAL CALIBRATION - List all analytes that are outside calibration criteria.
. RRF and average RRF
Did the laboratory follow the correct 12-hour clock analytical sequence? Ifno, fill out Worksheet VOA/SY-II B. YN
Did the laboratory analyze the initial calibration at the appropriate levels? YN
Validator: Date:
1/13
---- ---
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case:________ _ SDG: _ _ _ _ _____
Pest/PCB-IV-A IV A. CALIBRATION VERIFICATION - Accuracy Check (%D) - List all analytes that are outside calibration criteria
Standard ID Date Time Instrument Column Analyte %0 Samples Affected Action
<Detect/ND)
'
Validator: _ _ _ _____ _____ _ Date:
1/13
- - --- -
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___
Pest/PCB-IV-B IV B. CALIBRATION VERIFICATION -Time Elapsed - List all non-compliant standards.
Fraction Instrument Instrument Injection Time Action
(PEST or and Column Blank or Date and Time Elapsed Samples Affected (Detect/ND)
PCB) ID Sample ID (hours)
Validator: _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ ____ _ Date:
1/13
IV
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case:____ ___ _ SDG:___ _____ _
VOA/SV-IV ~~£...JA.oJ .. _ ...... - ... ...- ...J ..._...., ........._ .. _ .... _. .._.._,....,...,__ ------ ---- - - - -· '-"'-' 1. "1.&.&.J. "IVA l "l'-,.S '-'L&&.J.L...... ..&.'-4•0 & A '-' .I. '
Fraction (VOA/SV) Instrument
Date of
ICAL
Date &
Time of
CCAL
Matrix Compound %0 RRF Samples Affected Action
(Detect/ND)
Comments:
Did the laboratory follow the co1Tect 12-hour clock analytical sequence? Ifno, fill out Worksheet VOA/SY-II B. YN
Validator: _ _ _____ _ _ Date:
1/13
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case:____ ____
VOA/SV /Pest/PCB-V-A V. A. BLANK ANALYSIS
SDG:___ ___ ___
List the blank contamination below. Concentration Level: __
Sampler: _______ Company: Contacted: Yes No Date:____
1. Laboratory: Method, Storage and Instrument Blanks
Fraction/ Same'e ID Date Date lnstru ment/ Matrix (Blan Type) Extracted Analvzed Column Compound Cone. (units)
2. Field: Equipment (Rinsate), Trip and Bottle Blanks
Fraction/ Same'e ID Date Date Instrument/ Compound Cone. (units) Matrix (Blan Type) Extracted Analvzed Column
Date:Validator: ~-~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~-
1/13
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
SDG:________ _Case:~--------~ VOA/SV /Pest/PCB-V-B V. B. BLANK ACTIONS - List the maximum concentrations of blank compounds.
Compound TJpe of lank
Date Blank Sampled,
Originated, or Analvzed
Max. Cone. (unit)
Blank CRQL (unit)
Blank 2xCRQL1
(unit)
Blank 5xCRQL2
(unit)
Samples Affected
Action
For methylene chloride, 2-butanone, an :l acetone only. 2 For bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate only.
Comments: --------------------------------------------~
Date: ______Validator:------------
1/13
EPA-NE- Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:________
SV-Vl-A VI A. DEUTERA TED MONITORING COMPOUNDs (DMCs) - List all DMC recoveries that are outside the control limits. Page l of2
Method
SOMOl.2
Other:
Sample ID Matrix
Phenol-d5 BCE Water Soil Water Soil
39-106 17-103 40-1 05 12-98
% Recovery % Recovery
2CP Water Soil
41-106 13-101
% Recovery
Semi-Volatile Method QC Acceptance Criteria
4MP NBZ Water Soil Water SQ!! 25-111 8-100 43-108 16-103
% Recovery % Recovery
2NP DCP Water Soil Water Soil 40-108 16-1 04 37-105 23-104
% Recovery % Recovery
4CA Water Soil 1-145 1-145
% Recovery
Validator:
BCE= Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether-d8
NBZ= Nitroben zene-d5
4CA= 4-Chloroaniline-d~
2CP= 2-Chlorophenol-dJ 2NP= 2-Nitrophenol-dJ
4MP= 4-Methyhlphcnol-d8
DCP= 2A-Dichlorophenol-d3
Date:
1/13
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:_________
SV-Vl-A (Cont'd) VI A. DEUTERATED MONITORL~G COMPOUNDs (DMCs)- List all DMC recoveries that are outside the control limits. Page 2 of2
Method Semi-Volatile Method QC Acceotance Criteria
DMP ACY 4NP FLR NMP
SOMOl.2 Water Soil Water Soil Water Soil Water Soil Water Soil 43 40
47-114 111 41-107 20-97 33-116 16-166 42-111 108 22-104 1-121
Other:
Sample ID Matrix % Recovery % Recovery %Reco\'ery % Recovery % Recovery
ANC PYR
Water Soil Water Soil
44- 11 0 22-98 52-119 51-120
% Recovery % Recovery
BAP Water Soil
4332-121 111
% Recovery
DMP=Dimethylphthalate-d6 ACY=Acenaphthylene-d8
FLR=Fluorene-d10 NMP=4.6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol-d: PYR=Pyrene-d 10 BAP=Benzo(a)pyene-d 12
Note: Refer to NFG for guidance on actions· required for failures in DMC recoveries.
Validator: - - - --- - - ----- - - --- -
4NP=4-Nitrophenol-d4 ANC=Anthracene-d 10
Date:---------
1/13
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG: ~~~~~~~~-
S V -VJ-B VJ B. DEUTERATED MONITORING COMPOUNDs (DMCs) for SIM - List all DMC recoveries that are outside the control limits.
Semi-Volatile Organics b,· Selected Ion Monitorinl? Analvsis Acceptable QC Criteria
Method: Fluoranthene-d 10 2-Methylnaphthalene-d10
SOMOl .2 Water ~ Affected Analytes Action Water Soil Affected Analytes Action
50-1 50 50-150 (Detection/ND) 50-150 50-150 (Detection/ND)
Sample ID Matrix % Recovery % Recovery
Fluoranthenc Naphthalene
Pyrenc 2-Methylnaphthalene Be1120(a)anthracene Acenaphthylene Chrysene Acenaphthene
Benzo(b )fluoranthcne Fluorene Benzo(k)lluoranthcne Pentachlorophenol Benzo(a)pyrene Phenanthrenc Indeno( I .2.2-cd)pyrene Anthracene Dibenzo(a.h)anthracene Benzo(g.h.i)perylene
Note: Refer to NFG for guidance on actions required for failures in OMC recoveries.
Validator: --- ----------- - - - - - - Date:---------
1/13
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG: ~~~~~~~~
VOA-VI VI. DEUTERATED MONITORING COMPOUNDs (DMCs) - List all DMC recoveries that are outside the control limits. Page l of2
NOTE: The same control limits are applied to the selected ion monitoring (SIM) analysis.
Method Volatile Method QC Acceptance Criteria
SOMOl .2
Other:
Vinyl chloride-d3
Water Soil 65-131 68-122
Chloroethane-d~ \Vater .s_QjJ
71-131 61-130
DCE Water Soil 55-1 04 45-132
2-Butanone-d~ Water Soil 49-155 20-182
Chloroform-d \\later Soil 78-121 72-123
DCA Water .s_QjJ
78-129 79-122
Benzene-d6
Water Soil 77-124 80-121
Samole ID Matrix % Recoverv % Recovery % Recovery % Recoverv % Recoverv % Recovery % Recoverv
DCE= 1.1 -Dichloroethene - d2 DCA= I .2-Dichloroethane-d4
Validator: ------ ----------- Date: ---- - -
1/13
EPA-NE- Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG: ~~~~~~~~-
VOA -VI (Cont'd) VI. DEUTERATED MONITORING COMPOUNDs (DMCs)- List all DMC recoveries that are outside the control limits. Page 2 of2 NOTE: T he same control limits are applied to the selected ion monitoring (SIM) analysis .
.\ilethod Volatile Method QC Acccptance Criteria
SOMOl.2 DPA
Water Soil
79-124 74-124
Tolucne-d8
Water Soil 77-1 21 78-121
TOP Water Soil 73-1 21 72-130
2-Hexanone-d~ Water Soil
28-135 17-18•1
I .4-Dioxanc-d8
Water SQil 50-150 50-150
TCA Water ~ 73-125 56-161
DCZ \.Vater Soil 80-131 70-13 1
Other:
Sample ID Matrix % Recoverv % Recover.1 % Recoverv %Recovery % Recoverv % Recovery %Recoverv
DPA= 1.2-Dichloropropane -d6
TCA= 1.1.2.2-Tetracholoroethane-d: Note: Refer to '.'IFG for guidance on actions required for failures in DMC recoveries.
Validator: - ---------------
TOP= trans-1.3-0ichloropropene-d, DCZ= 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Date:----- --
1/13
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:._ _ ________
Pest/PCB-VI VI. SURROGATE COMPOUNDS: Spike Recoveries and Retention Time Shift
i.J l !Sl <111 :SUI IU}!,'1lC cllldIYl.C:> lll(ll, Q,l ~ V\.11...,lU\,, lll\o,; l-'"'' '"'"'"" I "VV,.. "'· V u.u- • ,.., .......... u.,V'H ........ _ _. .. ·~-- ·-·
I % Recovery QC Limits II Retention Time Windows I Method Column I Column 2 Column I Column 2
TCX DCB TCX DCB TCX DCB TCX DCB
SOMOl.2 30-150 30-150 30-150 30-150
Other:
Sample ;<; umber/Matri x Date/Time % Recovery Retention Time Shift Action
Note: Refer to NFG for guidance on actions required for failures in surrogate recoveries.
Date:Validator:--- ------- --- - - --- - ~ 1/13
--- ---- --- ----- --- - -----
EPA-NE- Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG: _ _ _ _ ____ ___
Pest/PCB-VII-C VII C. PESTICIDE/PCB CLEANUP - Sulfur Cleanup
Sample chromatograms were reviewed and found to be free from interfering sulfur peaks. y N
Ifno, list the compounds and samples affected by the unacceptable sulfur cleanup.
Sulfur Interference ActionSamples Affected (Major/Minor/Limited)
Were all target compounds less than QL for the Sulfur blank? y N
Action: Refer to EPA New England Data Review Program Supplement guidance (Section 2.11) for actions to be taken for deficient sulfur cleanup. Comment on any action taken below.
Validator: Date:
1/13
-------
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:__________
Pest/PCB-VII-A VII A. PESTICIDE/PCB CLEANUP - GPC Calibration and Verification
The GPC Calibration data and GPC Calibration Verification Solution recovery data were reviewed and found to meet criteria. Y N NA
If no, list the compounds and samples affected by the unacceptable GPC performance.
GPC% Date/Time of GPC GC Resolution Action Samples Affected % Rec QC LimitsAnalysis Analyte Calibrat ion or or RT
Date Calib. Verification Shift
y NWere all target compounds less than QL for the GPC blank9
Were acceptable GPC Calibration Verifications performed at the correct frequency? y N
Were Aroclor patterns similar to those corresponding Aroclor standards of the Initial Calibration sequence? y N
Action: Refer to National Functional Guidelines for the appropriate action to be taken. Comment on any action taken below:
Validator: _ _ _ ___ ___ ___ ___ _ _ Date:
1/13
--- - ---
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:____ _ _ _ ____
VOA/SV-VII VII. SEMIVOLATILE CLEANUP - GPC Calibration and Verification-List all analytes that are outside method cleanup QC criteria.
Date/Time GPC
Type of Cleanup Instrument# Calibrated or
or Lot# C heck Solution Analyzed
Compound % Rec QC Limits Samples Affected Action
y NDid the GPC column meet: resolution requirements? y NPeak shape requirements? y NRetention time shift requirements? y NWas the GPC calibration, Silica Gel cleanup checked at the method required frequency with correct compounds and concentrations? y NWere all compounds less than QL for the GPC/Si lica Gel/Acid-Pa11ition blank?
y NDid the blank surrogate recoveries and IS area counts and RTs (if added) meet method QC acceptance criteria? Comments:
Validator:_ _ _ ______ ___ ___ _ Date:
1/13
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:~ ~~------~ Pest/PCB-VII-B VII B. PESTICIDE/PCB CLEANUP - Florisil Cartridge Performance Check
The Florisil Cartridge Performance Check recovery data were reviewed and found to meet criteria. y N
Ifno, list the analytes and samples affected by the unacceptable Florisil Cartridge Check.
Florisil Car tridge
Lot#
Date of Florisil Cartridge
C heck
GC Analysis
Date Analyte
% Rec.
QC Lim its Samples Affected Action
Were acceptable Florisil Cartridge Performance Checks performed at the coJTect frequency" y N
Action: Refer to Functional Guidelines for the appropriate action to be taken. Comment on any action taken below:
Validator: Date: -~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~ --~ -
1/13
-- ----
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SOG:__________
VOA/SV /Pest/PCB-VIII VIII. MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE - List all MS/MSD analytes that are outside method QC acceptance
criteria. Use a separate worksheet for each MS/MSD pair.
Sample# _ _ ___ _ _ Matrix ________ Concentration Level -------
Fraction Compound
Column 1 Column z* Method QC Limits
ActionMS O/o
Rec.
MSD O/o RPO
Rec.
MS MSD O/o % RPD
Rec. Rec.
O/o
Recovery RPO
For Pest/PCB only.
Date: ---Validator:----- -----
1/13
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:_ ___ _____ _
VOA/SV /Pest/PCB-IX IX. FIELD DUPLICATE PRECISION - List all field duplicate analytes that are outside criteria.
Use a separate worksheet for each field duplicate pair.
Sample Number ______ Duplicate Sample Number ______ Matrix ----
Sample Sample QL
Duplicate . Duplicate QL
Fraction Compound RPO Cone. SQL 2xSQL
Cone. SQL 2xSQL
QC Acceptance Criteria RPO or Action
NA•
·For instances where one duplicate result is ND (or reported less than the sample QL).
Does the MS/MSD data indicate acceptable laboratory precision? Y N
Refer to EPA New England Data Review Program Supplemental guidance for field duplicate actions (Section 2.8). Comments:
Sampler Name: ______ Contractor Name: ------ Date Contacted: _________
Reason for Contact and resolution obtained: ----------~-------------- Validator:------------ Date:-------------
1/13
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:._ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _
VOA/SV/Pest/PCB-X-A X A. ACCURACY CHECK (Performance Evaluation Results) - List all analytes that are outside criteria.
y NAre more than one-half of the PES analytes within criteria for each parameter?
Non-EPARegion I Type ofAmpulePE Sample ActionSamples Affected PESEPA PESCone.AnalyteMatrix Fraction PESNumberNumber Scores""Scores*
* For Region I PESs indicate the Region I PES Score Report Result: Action High; Action Low; TCL MISS; TCL CONT AMIN ANT; TIC HIT; TIC MISS; TIC CONTAMINANT
** For Non-EPA PESs indicate the non-EPA PES Score: PES COMPOUND MISS; PES COMPOlJND CONTAMINANT; PES COMPOl.JND HIT (% Recovery Limits)
Refer to EPA New England Data Review Program Supplemental guidance for EPA PES and actions (Section 2.7).
Date: ----Validator:-------------- ---~
1/13
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
VOA/SV /Pest/PCB-X-B X B. ACCURACY CHECK (Laboratory Control Sample [LCS] Results) - List all analytes that are outside criteria.
Column 2Acceptable Column 1 ActionSamples Affected CompoundFractionMatrix MethodLCS ID LCS%R%R Rani'e LCS%R
Date:Validator:--------------- --- - - ---
1/13
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:_________ _ VOA/SV-XI XI. INTERNAL STANDARD PERFORMANCE List the internal standards that are outside the area count and retention time method QC acceptance criteria. IS Area Count Method QC acceptance criteria: - --- ---- --- - - --IS Retention Time Method QC acceptance criteria: - - ----- --- --- -
Sample Date and Non-Compliant Acceptable Range (ISRTInternal Action FractionInstrumentNumber Time Internal area or RT shift)ShiftStandard AreaAnalyzed(TRs) Standard
Date:Validator:----- - - - ---- --- - - --------
1/13
------ --
EPA NE - Data Validation Worksheet
SDG:_ _ _ _ _____Case:_____ ___ _
Pest/PCB-XII XII. ANALYTE IDENTIFICATION List samples below that contained false positive and/or negative reported results, and samples that contained detected compounds which have a percent difference greater than ±25% between the two columns.
Column I ID: Column 2 ID: Sample ID Analyte
RT RT Window Cone. RT RT Window Cone. %0 Action
y NWas OC/MS Confirmation performed for the appropriate samples?
y NWere corresponding Aroclor standards analyzed within 72 hours of the sample(s) with Aroclors detected?
Validator: _ ___ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ Date:
1/13
---- --
EPA-NE- Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:__________ VOA/SV-XII XII. TARGET COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION - List the analytes that are outside the acceptance criteria.
Sample Number Compound MS Ions RRT Action
Validator:______________ Date:
1/3
--------- --- - - - --
EPA-NE - Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG:________ _
VOA/SV-XIII XIII. SAMPLE QUANTITATION AND% SOLIDS
Recalculate, from the raw data, the concentrations for one positive detect and one reported sample quantitation limit for a non-detect in a diluted sample or soil sample per fraction. (Note: Although NFG requires that one calculation for each fraction in each sample be performed, the validator is only required to reproduce an example, for each fraction, of one positive detect and one sample quantitation limit calculation on this worksheet.)
Do all soil/sediment samples have% solids greater than 30%? y N lfno, list sample numbers,____________ _ _____________ _ ______ Refer to EPA New England Data Review Supplemental Program guidance for actions related to %solids (Section 2, 10).
Fraction Calculation
VOA
Sample No.:
Reported Compound:
Reported Value:
Not Detected Compound:
Reported Quantitation Limit:
BNA
Sample No.:
Reported Compound:
Reported Value:
Not Detected Compound:
Reported Quantitation Limit:
Validator: Date:
1/13
EPA-NE- Data Validation Worksheet
Case: SDG: _ _ _ _ ___ _ _
Pest/PCB-XIII XIll. SAMPLE QUANTITATION AND %SOLIDS
Recalculate, from the raw data, the concentrations for one positive detect and one reported sample quantitation limit for a non-detect in a diluted sample or soil sample per fraction. (Note: Although NFG requires that one calculation for each fraction in each sample be performed, the validator is only required to reproduce an example, for each fraction. of one positive detect and one sample quantitation limit calculation on this worksheet.)
Y N Do all soil/sediment samples have % solids greater than 30%? If no, list sample numbers....,....=---- ---- - - ------,-,-- --c,---.,--- -,--.,---,-,- :-,-:---,-,,---,--,,.--:-":'." Refer to EPA New England Data Review Supplemental Program guidance for actions related to %solids (Section 2.10).
Fraction Calculation
Pesticides
Sample No.:
Repo11ed Compound:
Reported Value:
Not Detected Compound:
Reported Quantitation Limit:
PCB
Sample J\io.:
Repotted Compound:
Reported Value:
Not Detected Compound:
Reported Quantitation Limit:
Date: ~~~~~~~~-Validator:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
1/13