7/27/2019 Sensor for pH DeGrandpre.pdf
1/11
A sensor for in situ indicator-based measurements of seawater pH
Matthew P. Seidel a,1, Michael D. DeGrandpre a,, Andrew G. Dickson b
aDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, United Statesb Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, United States
Received 12 June 2007; received in revised form 6 November 2007; accepted 28 November 2007
Available online 15 December 2007
Abstract
Indicator-based spectrophotometric pH methods are now proven and commonly used for analysis of ocean samples; however,
no autonomous system for long-term in situ applications has been developed based on this method. We describe herein an
autonomous indicator-based pH sensor for seawater applications adapted from a design originally developed for freshwater pH
measurements (SAMI-pH). The new SAMI-pH uses a different pH indicator, flow cell design, detection system, and mixing
configuration to improve upon the freshwater performance. A new method was also tested that utilizes an indicator concentration
gradient in the sample to correct for the pH perturbation caused by the indicator. With these design changes, laboratory tests found
the precision improved from 0.004 to 0.0007 and the accuracy improved from 0.0030 to +0.0017 based on comparisons with
benchtop UV/Vis measurements. In situ testing of two SAMI-pH instruments was completed off the pier at Scripps Institution of
Oceanography. The average pH offset between the two instruments over the 22 d deployment period was 0.00420.0126 ( n =883),
with the precision primarily regulated by large spatial and temporal variability at the site. The results demonstrate that the SAMI-
pH can provide drift-free and precise pH measurements in adverse measurement conditions (extensive fouling and large tidal
variability). With the current battery power (18 alkaline D-cells), the system can be deployed for periods up to 2 months with a
0.5 h measurement frequency.
2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: pH sensor; in situ; autonomous; spectrophotometry; inorganic carbon; marine chemistry
1. Introduction
Quantifying and understanding the impacts of oceanic
uptake of anthropogenic CO2 is an important contempor-
ary problem that has brought intense focus on the ocean
inorganic carbon system. The rapid rise in atmospheric
CO2 has increased the concentration of CO2 in the oceans
(Peng et al., 2003). Surface water pH has already
decreased by
0.1 units and the continued uptake ofCO2 is expected to decrease surface ocean pH by 0.20.3
units over the next century (Orr et al., 2005). A decrease in
pH of this magnitude could have large-scale impacts on
marine ecosystems (Orr et al., 2005), will result in
decreased uptake of CO2 by the ocean (Sabine et al.,
2004), and will affect burial rates of organic and inorganic
carbon (Feely et al., 2004). Understanding the inorganic
carbon cycle is also key to understanding and predicting
net community metabolism, airsea gas exchange, and
export of carbon from the surface to depth. New and
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Marine Chemistry 109 (2008) 1828www.elsevier.com/locate/marchem
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 406 243 4118; fax: +1 406 243 4227.
E-mail address: [email protected]
(M.D. DeGrandpre).1 Tel.: +1 406 243 4118; fax: +1 406 243 4227.
0304-4203/$ - see front matter 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.marchem.2007.11.013
mailto:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.11.013http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.11.013mailto:[email protected]7/27/2019 Sensor for pH DeGrandpre.pdf
2/11
improved autonomous techniques are needed that can
collect high quality, high temporal resolution CO2 data for
characterizing both long and short term changes in the
marine inorganic carbon system.
Seawater pH has become a more appealing inorganic
carbon parameter because improvements in the spectro-photometric method have made it consistent with the
other CO2 system parameters (e.g., Byrne and Breland,
1989) and it is readily measurable on ships with commer-
cially available instrumentation. From our standpoint,
another advantage is that spectrophotometric pH methods
are, ostensibly, more easily adapted for in situ measure-
ments. If pH is used in inorganic carbon calculations, it is
highly desirable that the calculated dissolved inorganic
carbon (DIC), total alkalinity (AT) orpCO2be comparable
in precision and accuracy to measured values, i.e.,
1.5 mol kg
1
(Byrne et al., 1999), 2.0 mol kg
1
(Dickson et al., 2003),and1atm (Murphy et al., 1998),
respectively. To illustrate the sensitivity of calculated DIC
andpCO2 to pH uncertainty, we used the CO2 equilibrium
model CO2SYS (Lewis and Wallace, 1998). The carbonic
acid constants in Mehrbach et al. (1973) refit by Dickson
and Millero (1987) were used because these constants
give the most accurate calculations of inorganic carbon
parameters from spectrophotometric pH measurements
(Clayton et al., 1995; Byrne et al., 1999). Calculations
were made using a constant alkalinity of 2250 mol kg1
over the pH range 7.78.3. For a pH uncertainty of
0.005, the error in DIC ranges from 2.03.5 molkg1, lowest at the lower pHs typical of deep water. If the
AT precision stated above is included in the calculation,
the pH accuracy needs to be 0.002 to estimate DIC
within 1.5 mol kg1. This level of uncertainty is
adequate for most applications. Similar calculations for
pCO2 reveal that the pH error is more critical at lower pH
values wherepCO2 is higher. A pH uncertainty of 0.002
gives a pCO2 error of 5.0 atm at pH 7.7 (pCO2=980
atm) and an error of 1.1 atm at pH 8.3 (pCO2=182-
atm). Previous shipboard studies have obtained pH
accuracy (which typically limits the pH uncertainty) from0.0010.005 and precision from 0.0010.0004 (Byrne
and Breland, 1989; Clayton et al., 1995; Tapp et al., 2000;
Bellerby et al., 2002).
Some work on in situ spectrophotometric pH sensors
has been undertaken. An instrument for obtaining vertical
depth profiles of pH and pCO2 from a ship has been
developed (Nakano et al., 2006). The instrument collected
data to 1000 m with accuracy of 0.0020.005 pH units
when compared to discrete samples. The SEAS pH
instrument, designed for in situ spectrophotometric pH
and other inorganic carbon measurements, was tested in
seawater and freshwater (Liu et al., 2006). Shipboard
depth profiles in the Equatorial Pacific and Gulf of
Mexico were collected. The in situ precision was 0.0014
while accuracy was not reported. Both the Nakano et al.
(2006) and Liu et al. (2006) designs require high power
(67 W) light sources, which limit the duration they can
be deployed in the field.We have also previously presented the design and
performance of an in situ spectrophotometric pH system,
optimized for freshwater measurements (Martz et al.,
2003). The Submersible Autonomous Moored Instrument
for pH, or SAMI-pH, accuracy and precision was 0.003
and 0.004 pH units (n = 16), respectively, when deployed
in a river over an 8 d period. No in situ indicator-based pH
sensors, however, have been deployed for extended
periods (weeks to months) in a marine environment. In
this paper, we describe the optimization of the Martz et al.
(2003) design for seawater applications. The new SAMI-pH uses a different pH indicator, flow cell design,
detection system, and mixing configuration to improve
upon the freshwater performance. A 22 d in situ seawater
pH time-series is presented and demonstrates that the
SAMI-pH sensor is capable of collecting accurate and
precise long-term in situ data on ocean moorings and other
unmanned platforms.
2. Principle of operation
A theoretical basis for the spectrophotometric deter-
mination of pH is given in Clayton and Byrne (1993)and readers should refer to that article and other articles
by Byrne et al. for a more in depth discussion. The
method is based upon the equilibrium reaction of a pH
indicator, usually a diprotic sulfonephthalein indicator,
HLpKa
H L2 1
where HL and L2 are the protonated and deprotonated
forms of the indicator and pKa is the second apparent
dissociation constant. The acidic H2L form is not present
at seawater pHs. The sulfonephthalein indicator m-cresolpurple (mCP) was selected because it has been exten-
sively used in past studies (Clayton and Byrne, 1993;
Clayton et al., 1995; Byrne et al., 1999; DOE, 1994).
Combining the log form of the indicator equilibrium
expression and Beer's Law yields:
pH pKa logR e1
e2 Re3
2
whereR is the absorbance ratioA2/A1 corresponding to the
peak absorbance wavelengths 2
and 1
of the L2 and
HL forms, respectively, and the eis are the temperature-
19M.P. Seidel et al. / Marine Chemistry 109 (2008) 1828
7/27/2019 Sensor for pH DeGrandpre.pdf
3/11
dependent ratios of the molar absorptivities () of the two
species at both 1 and 2,
e1 HLe578
HLe434
e2 Le578
HLe434
e3 Le434
HLe434
: 3
For mCP, the s are measured at the peak absorbance
wavelengths for L2 (578 nm) and HL (434 nm).
The adaptation of this methodology for autonomous in
situ applications requires special considerations to retain
the accuracy and precision of the benchtop method. Most
lab measurements are performed at a fixed temperature,
typically 25 C (DOE, 1994). For in situ applications,
temperature is not controlled and the temperature de-
pendence of pKa and eis must be accurately known. The
eis also depend upon the detection system optical band-
pass and must be determined for that bandpass andliterature values cannot be used. In situ instruments, in
particular, may use a larger bandpass to increase light
throughput to reduce the light source power requirements.
Moreover, when using a short pathlength optical cell
(for reasons described below), the pH indicator solution
can significantly alter the sample pH thus requiring some
method to correct for the pH perturbation. Most benchtop
methods use 10 cm pathlength cuvets with5106 mol
kg1 indicator (e.g., Clayton and Byrne, 1993). At this
concentration, the magnitude of the perturbation is
typically b0.001 pH units (Chierici et al., 1999). Even
so, various methods have been used to account for the pHperturbation (Zhang and Byrne, 1996; Bellerby et al.,
2002). In the design presented here, we use a custom-
made 1.1 cm pathlength flow cell to maximize light
throughput and minimize the light source power require-
ments and flush volume. Light throughput with a 0.5 W
tungsten lamp gives sufficient signal-to-noise to achieve
the desired level of absorbance precision. From our ob-
servations, throughput drops off roughly proportionally topathlength, so a 1 W lamp is required to achieve the
same signal-to-noise for a 2 cm pathlength cell. The short
pathlength also reduces the pumping required to flush the
system completely for blank measurements. These power
savings allow for longer deployments, critical for an au-
tonomous system. However, because the 1.1 cm cell
requires indicator concentrations 10 times greater than
10 cm cells, the pH perturbation becomes significant. To
address this problem, a perturbationcorrection metho-
dology suggested by Martz et al. (2003) has been
thoroughly evaluated here, as described below.
3. Methods
3.1. Instrument modifications
Two instruments, SAMI-47 and SAMI-51, with 47 and 51
corresponding to their serial numbers, were manufactured by
Sunburst Sensors, LLC with modifications to the Martz et al.
(2003) design. The new design uses mCP instead of cresol red
indicator because the mCP response better matches the full pH
range of seawater. A commercially available static mixer (de-
scribed below) replaced a coiled tube mixer to more effectively
mix the indicator and sample. A custom made z-configuration
flow cell (Fig. 1) replaced the 90o flow path optical cell used in
the original SAMI design (DeGrandpre et al., 1995; Martz et al.,
Fig. 1. Instrument design for the seawater SAMI-pH modified from the SAMI-pH for freshwater ( Martz et al., 2003). NO and NC refer to thenormally open and closed valve settings. Dotted lines represent fiber optics.
20 M.P. Seidel et al. / Marine Chemistry 109 (2008) 1828
7/27/2019 Sensor for pH DeGrandpre.pdf
4/11
2003) to reduce bubble trapping that occasionally occurred in the
90 flow cell.Because of the orientation of the inlet relative to the
optical channel, bubbles are more easily swept through the z-
configuration. To improve light throughput, the spectrograph
detection system was replaced with a fiber optic splitter con-
nected to three silicon photodiode detectors with discrete inter-ference filters (Yuan and DeGrandpre, 2006).
3.2. Flow design
The sample and indicator solutions are connected to the
normally open and normally closed ports, respectively, of a
three-way solenoid valve (161K031, Neptune Research Inc.)
(Fig. 1). A low power 50 l per pulse solenoid pump
(LPLA1210050L, The Lee Co.) draws sample or indicator
through the valve and dispenses it into the downstream
plumbing. The pump and valve are enclosed in a silicone oil-
filled housing with a diaphragm for pressure equilibration. The
indicator solution, described below, is contained in a 150 ml gas-impermeable bag (Pollution Measurement Corp.). The static
mixer, developed for HPLC, is a 350 l internal volume
convoluted flow path encased in a stainless steel housing (421-
0350B, Analytical Scientific Instruments). The connecting and
exit tubing consists of 1.6 mm o.d., 0.76 mm i.d. PEEK.
3.3. Optical design
Light from a 2.3 mm diameter 0.5 W tungsten lamp (4115-B,
Gilway Technical Lamp) is collected by butt coupling to a 0.37
numerical aperture 1000 m fused silica fiber (ThorLabs Inc.).
The fiber is fitted into the custom made PEEK z-cell (Fig. 1)using a nut (P-331, Upchurch Scientific Inc.) andferrules (P-359,
Upchurch Scientific Inc.). The cell pathlength is 1.1 cm with a
17.7 l internal volume. The fiber input and output ferrule ends
create a watertightseal by compressing Teflon gaskets onto fused
silica windows. The transmitted light is collected by another
1000 m fiber optic coupled to a 1 3 fiber optic bundle splitter
(FiberTech Optica Inc.) (Yuan and DeGrandpre, 2006). The light
from each bundle channel passes through a series of optical
filters, which isolate the three wavelengths of interest (434, 578,
and 780 nm). Measurements at 780 nm, where mCP has no
absorbance, serve as a correction for light throughput changes
between blank measurements. Additional filters are used tominimize out of band (stray) light. For detection at the 780 nm
referencechannel, two 780 nm bandpass filters (780-10-50; Intor,
Inc.) are used. At the two analytical wavelengths, optical
interference filters (435.8-10-45 and 577.7-10-50; Intor, Inc.) are
combined with heat absorbing filter glass (040FG11 at 434 nm
and 005FG13 at 578 nm, Andover Corp.). The combined filters
reduced stray light to b0.15% (Yuan and DeGrandpre, 2006)
which is critical for good absorbance and pH accuracy. All
interference filters have a 10 nm bandpass at full width half
maximum; however, the center wavelength can vary slightly
between filters with the same part number, requiring thateis (Eq.
(3)) be measured for each SAMI. The filtered light is detected bysilicon photodiodes (S2386-45K, Hamamatsu Corp). The
detector photocurrent is converted to voltage in an amplifying
circuit, digitized into 12 bits and stored using a data logger (TFX-
11, Onset Computer Corp.).
3.4. Indicator solution
The SAMI-pH and benchtop UV/Vis indicator solutions
are comprised of1.0103 mol kg-soln1 mCP (211761-
10G, 90% dye content, Aldrich) and 0.70 mol kg-soln1 NaCl
(S671-3, Fisher Chemicals) adjusted to a pH of 7.5 with
1.0 M HCl. The indicator concentration was tested over the
range 0.020.0005 mol kg-soln1 and it was found that
1.0103 mol kg-soln1 mCP gave the best balance between
pH precision and flush times (results not shown). The
influence of indicator pH is discussed below.
3.5. Measurement sequence
Each measurement begins by flushing 3.75 ml of sample(75 pump pulses) through the normally open (NO) port on the
valve (Fig. 1). This flushing is done to completely clear the
system of indicator from the previous measurement so a blank
measurement can be taken. Next, a 50 l pulse of indicator is
injected into the seawater sample through the normally closed
(NC) port on the valve (Fig. 1) followed by an additional 25
pump pulses (1.25 ml). Light intensity is recorded for each of the
25 sample pump pulses as the indicator peak flushes through the
optical cell. The first four of these measurements are prior to
arrival of the indicator and are averaged to obtain a blank value,
i.e., 100% transmittance. Optical blanks are therefore recorded
for every pH analysis rather than every 12 h as done in Martzet al. (2003). The standard deviation of the four blank mea-
surements is typically b0.0005 absorbance units. The full
measurement sequence requires four min to complete. The
SAMI 18 D-cell battery pack provides sufficient power for 2448
measurements or50 d for a 0.5 h measurement frequency, 100
d for a 1 h measurement frequency, etc.
3.6. Molar absorptivity ratios (eis)
To calculate the eis (Eq. (3)), molar absorptivities for the
acidic and basic forms of mCP were determined at both
434 nm and 578 nm for the SAMI-pHs and the reference
spectrophotometer (Varian Cary 300 Bio UV/Vis). A 0.68 molkg1 NaCl solution with 0.02 mol kg1 NaOH was used for
the determination of the basic L2 form of mCP. In this
solution, greater than 99.995% is in the L2 form. A solution
with pH of 5.5 was prepared for the HL form consisting of
0.018 mol kg1 sodium acetate, 1.0 mol kg1 HCl, and
sufficient NaCl to set the ionic strength at 0.70 mol kg1
(Clayton and Byrne, 1993). At pH 5.5, the presence of H2L,
which has a poorly documented pKa and cannot be accurately
quantified, is minimized. L2, which is present at pH 5.5, was
accounted for by calculating its concentration and correcting
for its molar absorptivity contribution to the final absorbance
value (Martz, 2005). The correction was approximately 53%for HL578 due to the much larger L578. However, because
21M.P. Seidel et al. / Marine Chemistry 109 (2008) 1828
7/27/2019 Sensor for pH DeGrandpre.pdf
5/11
HL578 is small, pH is relatively insensitive to errors in this
parameter (Table 1). Corrections for the other three molar
absorptivities were all less than 0.3% of the measured value.
It is critical to account for the ei temperature dependence
(Zhang and Byrne, 1996; Gabriel et al., 2005). For example,
using constanteis for a 10 C temperature change creates a pH
error of0.006 pH units. The molar absorptivity temperature
dependence from 525 C was determined for each SAMI and
the Cary UV/Vis. Replicate measurements were used to
determine the precision and resulting uncertainty in
calculated pH (Table 1). As can be seen in Table 1, uncertainty
of the limits the pH accuracy to 0.0010.002 pH units. The
measurement uncertainty is primarily controlled by indicator
solution preparation.
3.7. Indicator pKa
The pKa for mCP, determined on the total hydrogen ion
concentration scale (Clayton and Byrne 1993; DOE, 1994) is:
pKa 1245:69
T 3:8275 0:00211 35 S ; 4
where Tis temperature in Kelvin and S is salinity. The pKa in
Eq. (4) was determined for temperatures ranging from
293 KT303 K and salinities from 30S37. It should
be noted that in situ deployments may have temperatures
outside of this range. We used the van't Hoff equation to
extrapolate the pKa temperature dependence. The change in
entropy and enthalpy were calculated using the constants A, B,
and C reported by Millero (1995).
3.8. pH perturbation correction
A gradient of indicator passing through the flow cell is used
to correct for the indicator pH perturbation. The indicator and
sample mix as they move toward the flow cell, generating a
dilution curve (Fig. 2). The gradient of indicator absorbances is
recorded and the pH is calculated at each point in the dilution
curve using Eq. (2). The total indicator concentration [HL]T,
which is the sum of the two indicator species (Eq. (5)), is
calculated from absorbances and molar absorptivities using
Eqs. (6) and (7),
HL T HL L2
5
HL A434 Le578b A578 Le434b
HLe434 Le578b2 HLe578 Le434b
26
L2
A578 HLe434b A434 HLe578b
HLe434 Le578b2 HLe578 Le434b2:
7
Table 1
The temperature dependence of the mCP molar absorptivities
Species SAMI-47 SAMI-51 UV/Vis SAMI
precision
SAMI-pH
error
HL434 17104
26(t25)
16911
26(t25)
17340
26(t25)
52 0.0012
HL578 85 +
(t25)
110+
(t25)
79 +
(t25)
11 0.0010
L434 2301+
12(t25)
2238+
11.7(t25)
2151+
12(t25)
27 0.0009
L578 38040
71(t25)
37480
71(t25)
37973
71(t25)
170 0.0020
Molar absorptivity values are given in kg mol1 cm1 and temperature (t)
is in C. These values are only applicable to mCP dye lot 11517KC from
Sigma Aldrich. The average SAMI precision is calculated as the standard
deviation of replicate measurements (n =9) from both instruments. The
SAMI-pH error is estimated by adding or subtracting the SAMI precisionfrom the molar absorptivity value and recalculating the pH value.
Fig. 2. (Top) Absorbances calculated from intensity measurements taken
for 25 pump pulses as the indicator slug passes through the flow cell
(1 absorbance measurement obtained per pump pulse). Absorbances
between 1.5 and 0.2 absorbance units are used to calculate the pH
(symbols). Filled circles are A434 and open circles are A578. (Bottom) pH
versus total indicator concentration [mCP]T for the SAMI data from the
top figure (filled circles) and theoretical equilibrium model calculations
(open circles). A linear extrapolation through each data set gives an R2
value of 0.9998 for the SAMI data and N0.9999 for the pH perturbation
model. The y-intercept (7.9169) represents the perturbation-free pH.
22 M.P. Seidel et al. / Marine Chemistry 109 (2008) 1828
7/27/2019 Sensor for pH DeGrandpre.pdf
6/11
The are in kg-soln mol1 cm1 and pathlength (b) in cm. A
plot of pH versus [HL]T is extrapolated to zero indicator
concentration to determine the perturbation-free pH (Fig. 2).
Mixing occurs at both the leading edge and tail end of the
indicator slug as shown in Fig. 2. The leading edge of the
indicator pulse has only 23 absorbance values in the optimal
absorbance range (0.21.5 a.u.) (Ingle and Crouch, 1988);
however, the tail end of the dilution curve is more dispersed.
Approximately 9 points in this portion of the dilution curve are
used to create the perturbation correction plot (Fig. 2). Because
in this case the indicator pH is 7.5, the pH decreases with
increasing indicator concentration.
It was proposed in Martz et al. (2003) that a linear ex-
trapolation could be used to determine the pH with no indicator
present. We examined the linearity of the pH perturbation using
an equilibrium model. The model includes the CO2 and indicator
equilibrium expressions, equilibrium constants, the original DIC
andATof the sample and indicator, and dilution factors (calculated
from the total indicator concentration). The program calculates apH value for a range of points with varying indicator con-
centration and dilution factors. An example of a theoretical pH
perturbation curve is shown in Fig. 2. TheR2 value for a linear fit
to the theoretical data is N0.9999 over the [HL]T range used.
Linear relationships are also found over the entire pH range tested
(7.58.5) (not shown). Therefore, a linear fit is used with the
dilution curve data from each sample measurement (Fig. 2) to
determine the pH perturbation.
3.9. Laboratory tests
Laboratory pH measurements were made on certifiedreference materials (CRMs) (Dickson, 2001) or seawater
collected in Hood Canal, Washington (USA). To prevent CO2exchange during replicate analyses, samples were stored in
gas-impermeable bags (Pollution Measurement Corp.) and the
bags were connected directly to the input line of the sensor
(Fig. 1). All laboratory measurements were made at20 C.
Temperature was controlled to 0.05 C using a circulating
water bath (Thermo Neslab RTE 7) and a water chamber
placed over the top of the SAMI-pH. The sample bags were
also placed inside the chamber so that the sample and optical
cell of the SAMI-pH were at the same temperature. All tem-
perature probes and water baths were calibrated to a certifieddigital thermometer (4400, Eutechnics).
Comparison measurements were obtained using the Cary
double beam UV/Vis spectrophotometer. Dual 10-cm jacketed
cell holders were used for temperature control. The 10 cm
sample cuvet was mixed using a magnetic stirrer (Spectrocell,
Inc.). Each pH measurement took sample directly from the same
bag used for the SAMI-pH measurements. The outlet tube from
the bag was placed inside the cuvet and sample was allowed to
overflow the cuvet 10 volumes to insure the cuvet was
thoroughly rinsed. The cuvet was then placed inside the UV/Vis
and allowed to reach the desired temperature (5 min). Each
measurement used three 40 l additions of 1103 mol kg1
indicator with absorbance measurements taken for each addition.
As in the SAMI-pH, the resulting plot of pH versus total
indicator concentration was used to linearly extrapolate to a zero
indicator concentration.
3.10. Field tests
In situ testing of SAMI-47 andSAMI-51 wasperformed in a
seawater tank and off the SIO pier. Comparison measurements
were made on a Cary 1E UV/Vis spectrophotometer. Samples
were taken from the tank or pier in glass bottles with minimal
head space. Samples were first placed in a water bath for 20 min
set to the in situ water temperature and then a 10 cm cuvet at the
same temperature was filled with sample, minimizing the head
space. The cuvet was inserted into the Cary 1E for a blank
measurement and indicator was added as described above but
the cell containing sample and indicator was shaken by hand.
All discrete pH samples were measured immediately after
collection using the procedure described above.
Preliminary tests were made in a 100-gallon tank filled withseawater collected from a pipeline that extends 400 m into the
Pacific Ocean. A re-circulating pump was used to keep the water
uniformly mixed. The SAMI-pH instruments were programmed
to take measurements every 15 min. Discrete samples were
collected at 1 h intervals.
Immediately after these tests, the SAMI-pH instruments
were deployed from the SIO pier for a three week period.
Salinity, temperature, and depth were measured using a CTD
(Microcat, Seabird, Inc.). Discrete samples were collected for
DIC, AT, pH, and salinity. The SAMI-pHs were programmed
to measure pH every 30 min.
The SAMI-pH instruments went through a number ofpreparation steps in order to safely package them for deployment
off the pier. A copper cage was placed around the exposed SAMI
flow cell, fiber optics, temperature probe, and pump-valve
housing in order to protect the SAMI and provide fouling
resistance. The reagent bag was placed in a PVC box clamped to
the SAMI housing. The SAMI was thenplacedin a stainless steel
cage for protection and to provide solid anchor points. A 100-
foot serial communication cable was attached to the SAMI to
monitor the instrument performance. The deployment took place
from April 27, 2006 through May 25, 2006. Water depth at the
end of the pier is 8 m and the instruments were placed at 4 m
depth on opposite sides of the same piling (2 m apart), with anorth and south orientation to obtain the same exposure to east
west tidal and wave motion.
4. Results and discussion
4.1. Indicator pH
The pH perturbation is strongly dependent upon the
difference between the sample and indicator pH. To determine
the performance sensitivity to indicator pH, a 5.0103 mol
kg1 indicator solution was adjusted to pHs of 8.2, 8.0, 7.8, and
7.5 (0.1) using 1 M HCl or NaOH. Over this range, indicatorpH did not significantly influence accuracy and precision using
23M.P. Seidel et al. / Marine Chemistry 109 (2008) 1828
7/27/2019 Sensor for pH DeGrandpre.pdf
7/11
the linear extrapolation method; however, the best fits (highest
R2) were found with the lowest pH solution (Table 2). Based on
these results, we continued to use an indicator solution pH of
7.5, the pH chosen during the early stages of testing. Although
it makes intuitive sense to use a pH close to the sample pH to
minimize the perturbation, the results here suggest relative
insensitivity to this parameter.
4.2. Flow cell gradient
Initially, we were concerned that the gradient of indicator
concentration in the SAMI-pH optical flow cell could lead to
systematic errors because Beer's Law assumes a homogeneous
concentration. The validity of this assumption with the 17 l
optical cell was examined. The absorbance gradient between two
consecutive 50 l pump pulses is estimated from data in Fig. 2.
We split thisabsorbance gradient into30 separate slices along the
flow cell and converted the absorbances to transmittance. A
corrected absorbance and pH were then calculated from theaverage of these thirty transmittance values. This procedure
estimates a +0.0004 pH unit error in the actual pH of the sample.
Therefore, the absorbance gradient is nota significant problemin
the SAMI-pH; however, it could be more important for systems
that use long (10 cm) pathlength cells such as liquid core
waveguides (Liu et al., 2006) if the sample and indicator are not
well mixed.
4.3. Laboratory precision and accuracy
In the Martz et al. (2003) design, precision was found to
be 0.004 pH units and was controlled by blank drift, lampstability, and microscopic bubbles. The new design precision
was quantified over a wide range of sample pH (Table 3). The
average precision is 0.0007 pH units (n =165). We attribute
the improved precision to reduced bubble trapping in the z-
cell, a broader mixing curve due to the static mixer, and
implementation of frequent blank measurements.
The accuracy for the two SAMI-pH instruments was
determined by analyzing Hood Canal seawater (S=31, t=25 C)
every 20 min for an 8-hour period followed by analysis of the
remaining sample on the Cary UV/Vis (n=7). The average pH
measured by SAMI-47 and SAMI-51 were 7.91930.0005 and
7.91590.0006, respectively. The average pH measured on the
Cary spectrophotometer was 7.9180 0.0008 resulting in an
accuracy, relative to the Cary, for SAMI-47 and SAMI-51 of
+0.0013 and 0.0021, respectively (n=7).
4.4. SAMI-pH in situ testing
During the initial in situ tests in the laboratory seawater tank,
the average offset between SAMI-47 and SAMI-51 for 45tankmeasurements was 0.0017 units over a pH range of 8.19
8.21 and temperature from 22.1 to 22.2 C (data not shown).
Benchtop spectrophotometric pH measurements agreed to within
+0.0005 for SAMI-47 and 0.0015 for SAMI-51 (n =12).
The data collected during the 22 d deployment off Scripps
pier are shown in Fig. 3. A total of 1005pH measurements were
made by each SAMI. The pH was calculated using the linear
extrapolation method described above and shown in Fig. 2.
Sample regression plots for SAMI-47 and SAMI-51 at two
different pH values are shown in Fig. 4. All in situ and sample
data were corrected to the same in situ temperature using a
temperature coefficient of 0.0015 pH units per 0.1 C
calculated using the salinity and DIC/AT found at the site. The
resulting pH ranged from 8.42 to 7.74 with changes as large as
0.6 pH units over diurnal and tidal cycles (Fig. 3).
The time-series show large tidal swings and associated
temperature and salinity changes (Fig. 3). The depth ranged from
3.5 to 5.5 m and temperature changes N6 C were observed
during the tidal oscillations. The temperature alsoincreased from
a daily high of 1516 C at the start of the deployment to 18
19 C at the end of the deployment. The presence of large lateral
and vertical temperature gradients was confirmed using the
temperature records from SAMI-47 and SAMI-51. The two
SAMI-pH temperatures differed by up to 2 C during periods of
rapid temperature fluctuations. These times correspond to
Table 2
Evaluation of different indicator pHs
[mCP]
(mol
kg1)
Indicator
pH
Average
pH
pH
precision
Slope
(pH kg
mol1)
R2 pH
perturbation
0.005 8.2 7.8890 0.0004 222 0.98 0.011
0.005 8.0 7.8884 0.0004 40 0.79 0.0020.005 7.8 7.8886 0.0004 166 0.97 0.008
0.005 7.5 7.8886 0.0007 366 1.00 0.018
The average seawater sample pH was determined using the pH
perturbation method described in the text (n =5). Slope is the average
of the five slopes generated from the pH versus total indicator plot. The
R2 value is the average for the five measurements. As expected, the pH
perturbation is larger (larger positive or negative slope) when the pH of
the indicator is further away from the sample pH (to within the
tolerance of the uncertainty in the indicator pH). The perturbation is the
change in pH of the sample due to 5105 mol kg1 total indicator
concentration (the indicator concentration in the indicator reservoir
was 5 103 mol kg1). The indicator pH was determined using a pH
electrode and is only accurate to within 0.1 pH units. Measurementtemperature was 25 C.
Table 3
The pH precision for measurements made over the typical seawater
range
pH Precision 95% confidence Measurements
7.6862 0.0005 0.0002 23
7.7833 0.0009 0.0003 507.9159 0.0005 0.0002 25
7.9193 0.0006 0.0002 25
8.0260 0.0007 0.0003 17
8.2029 0.0009 0.0004 25
Samples are CRMs and Hood Canal seawater adjusted to varying pH
values using concentrated HCl or NaOH. Measurement temperature
was 25 C.
24 M.P. Seidel et al. / Marine Chemistry 109 (2008) 1828
7/27/2019 Sensor for pH DeGrandpre.pdf
8/11
significant pH differences between the SAMIs, presumably due
to large pH gradients associated with the temperature (water
mass) differences. Therefore, any time the measured temperature
difference between SAMI-51 and SAMI-47 wasN0.2 C, the pH
measurements were removed from the intercomparison between
the two instruments (122 measurements were removed). Using
the remainingdata, the agreementbetween SAMI-47 andSAMI-
51 was 0.00420.0126 (n =883) for the 22 d period (Fig. 5).
Tightening the temperature difference criteria to 0.1C improved
the comparison to 0.00400.011 and removed another 116
measurements. Filtering both time-series using a 2 h average
further reduces the scatter between the two SAMIs to 0.0084.
The lab measurements were more precise than this (Table 3) and
it is likely that the large spatial gradients, particles in the flow cell
(see below), and small response time differences, e.g., due to
different flushing times, degraded the precision between the two
instruments. The between-instrument precision is notably larger
during periods when pH was rapidly changing, i.e., at the
beginning and end of the deployment (compare Figs. 3 and 5).
Early on, the pH rate of change was as large as 0.016 min1 and
often largerthan 0.005 min
1
. Looking at the pH dilution curves,SAMI-51 flushed indicator1530 s more slowly than SAMI-
47 due to flow rate differences (pump efficiency), which, based
on the pH rates of change, could account for a significant portion
of the pH differences.
Importantly, the offset is small and there is no apparent drift
between the instruments during the deployment (Fig. 5). There
was also no systematic trend in the SAMI difference over the
pH and temperature range during the deployment (Fig. 6).
These results were further verified by comparison with
Fig. 3. In situ SAMI-pHs, salinity, temperature and depth during the 22
d deployment off SIO pier.
Fig. 4. pH versus total indicator concentration [mCP]T for two measurements from SAMI-47 and SAMI-51 during deployment off SIO pier. Theresulting pH (y-intercept) and R2 values are given in each plot.
Fig. 5. Comparison between SAMI-47 and SAMI-51 during the 22
d deployment calculated from Fig. 3 data. The average offset is
0.0042 0.0126 (n =883). See text for more discussion.
25M.P. Seidel et al. / Marine Chemistry 109 (2008) 1828
7/27/2019 Sensor for pH DeGrandpre.pdf
9/11
measurements of pH on discrete samples collected off the pier
on April 30 and May 3. SAMI-47 was deployed for both of
these days while SAMI-51 was deployed on May 2 and was
only compared to the pH values on May 3. Good agreement
was achieved between the SAMI-pH instruments and bench-
top spectrophotometric pH measurements with an average pH
offset of +0.0013 (n =8) for SAMI-47 and 0.0043 (n =3) for
SAMI-51.
After May 3, pH values were calculated from DIC and ATfrom discrete samples using CO2SYS (Lewis and Wallace,
1998) and the dissociation constants of Mehrbach et al. (1973)
refit by Dickson and Millero (1987). Using these pH values, the
average offset for both SAMI-47 and SAMI-51 are nearly
identical at 0.0348 and 0.0330 pH units (n =14). Use of other
CO2 equilibrium constants in CO2SYS (Lewis and Wallace,1998) did not improve the offset. Examination of the discrete
sample data pointed to a possible error in the AT values. In
surface waters, AT often follows a conservative relationship with
salinity (Millero et al., 1998); however, AT of the discrete
samples varied by 40 mol kg1 while the sample salinities
were very similar (33.54 0.05). Using an approximate relation-
ship between salinity and AT for California coastal waters
(AT=2150+44 [S31.25]) (G. Friederich, pers. comm., 2006),
the expected AT for the salinity range observed is 2249
2252 mol kg1 compared to the measured range of 22162254
(14) mol kg1. Using the salinity-predicted AT and the
measured DIC, the pH errors reduce to 0.014 and 0.012 pH unitsfor SAMI-47 and SAMI-51, respectively. Uncertainty in the pKa
(Eq. (4)), due to extrapolation to the in situ temperatures, may
also contribute to the pH uncertainty.
Although the instruments were only in the water for a short
time, barnacle and algal growth completely covered the
instruments. One concern in such an intense fouling environ-
ment is that, in drawing in a sample for analysis, particles can
occlude the optical path or clog the plumbing. The 780 nm
reference channel light throughput for the two instruments
during the 22 d deployment suggest that particles may have been
drawn in at times (Fig. 7). The fluctuating intensity for SAMI-51
from May 8
9 may be due to small particles entering the tubingand optical cell. The return to the original intensity value shows
that the particles eventually flushed out. SAMI-47 shows a
different trend with the intensity slowly drifting downward with
only 40% of the original intensity at the end of the deployment.
The resulting behavior was most likely due to lamp drift or
particulate matter entering the flow cell and slowly reducing the
light throughput. No particles were evident upon inspection of
the inside of the flow cell, however. The change in light
throughput shown in Fig. 7 was accounted for by obtaining blank
measurements for each pH analysis, i.e., for one set of data as
shown in Fig. 2. To verify the need for frequent blanks, pH
values for both instruments were calculated using individual
blank values and an initial blank value over a 32-hour section of
the field deployment data (May 2022). Using individual blank
values over this time-period, the average difference between
SAMI-47 and SAMI-51 pH valueswas 0.0017 0.0149pH units(n =64), while using a single initial blank value gave an average
offset of 0.0070 0.0246 pH units. No drift was observed
between the two instruments (Fig. 5), even with the large
changes in light throughput (Fig. 7), demonstrating the
robustness of the technique.
Fig. 6. pH difference between SAMI-47 and SAMI-51 versus temperature (A) and pH (B). The plot shows that the SAMIs respond very similarly over
the range of temperature and pH found during the deployment.
Fig. 7. % transmittance (relative light throughput) at 780 nm. This
wavelength is used for the correction of lamp drift, bubbles, particles,
and any other factors that affect light throughput between blank
measurements. The % transmittance is calculated relative to the initialthroughput at the start of the deployment.
26 M.P. Seidel et al. / Marine Chemistry 109 (2008) 1828
7/27/2019 Sensor for pH DeGrandpre.pdf
10/11
5. Conclusions
Multiple steps were undertaken to improve the SAMI-
pH performance. The filter-based detection system im-
proved the signal-to-noise and consequently, the absor-
bance precision. Molar absorptivities were corrected forthe presence of other indicator forms by using the pH,
concentration, and absorbance values of the acidic and
basic solutions. With these changes, the agreement be-
tween the Cary UV/Vis and SAMI-pH instruments in a
laboratory setting was improved from 0.003 to +0.0017.
Optimization of various procedures, including the pH
perturbation correction and mixing of the indicator and
sample, improved the precision to 0.0007 compared to
the previous precision of 0.004 of the Martz et al. (2003)
design.
The 22 d deployment off Scripps pier collected fromSAMI-47 and SAMI-51 collected the longest known in
situ spectrophotometric seawater pH time-series to date.
The excellent agreement between the two SAMI-pH
instruments and the Cary UV/Vis is very promising;
however, further tests are needed to determine internal
consistency with other inorganic carbon parameters.
The SAMI-pH can be used for studies related to
pressing contemporary carbon cycle questions such as
the oceanic uptake of atmospheric CO2 and the impacts
of ocean acidification. The instrument can be deployed
on many different platforms including Volunteer Obser-
ving Ships, permanent moorings, drifters, autonomousprofilers, and AUVs. Development of sensors for DIC
and AT is needed to make possible fully autonomous
characterization of the inorganic carbon system, i.e.,
through combined measurements of pH or pCO2 with
DIC orAT.
Acknowledgments
We thank Cory Beatty (University of Montana) for lab
and field assistance, Todd Martz (formerly UM, now at
MBARI) for discussions and Charles Coughran (SIO) fordeployment of instruments. Financial support was pro-
vided by NSF grant OCE-0327763 and a NSF-EPSCoR
fellowship to M. Seidel.
References
Bellerby, R.G.J., Olsen, A., Johannessen, T., Croot, P., 2002. A high
precision spectrophotometric method for on-line shipboard sea-
water pH measurements: the automated marine pH sensor (AmpS).
Talanta 56, 6169.
Byrne, R.H., Breland, J.A., 1989. High precision multiwavelength pH
determinations in seawater using cresol red. Deep-Sea Res. 36,
803810.
Byrne, R.H., McElligott, S., Feely, R.A., Millero, F.J., 1999. The role
of pHT measurements in marine CO2-system characterization.
Deep-Sea Res. 46, 19851997.
Chierici, M., Fransson, A., Anderson, L.G., 1999. Influence of m-cresol
purple indicator additions on the pH of seawater samples: correction
factors evaluated from a chemical speciation model. Mar. Chem. 65,
281290.Clayton, T.D., Byrne, R.H., 1993. Spectrophotometric seawater
pH measurements: total hydrogen ion concentration scale calibra-
tion of m-cresol purple and at sea results. Deep-Sea Res. 40,
21152129.
Clayton, T.D., Byrne, R.H., Breland, J.A., Feely, R.A., Millero, F.J.,
Campbell, D.M., Murphy, P.P., Lamb, M.F., 1995. The role of pH
measurements in modern oceanic CO2-system characterizations:
precision and thermodynamic consistency. Deep-Sea Res. II 42,
411429.
DeGrandpre, M.D., Hammar, T.R., Smith, S.P., 1995. In situ
measurements of seawaterpCO2. Limnol. Oceanogr. 40, 969975.
Dickson, A.G., Millero, F.J., 1987. A comparison of the equilibrium
constants for the dissociation of carbonic acid in seawater media.
Deep-Sea Res. 34, 17331743.Dickson, A.G., 2001. Reference materials for oceanic CO2 measure-
ments. Oceanog. 14, 2122.
Dickson, A.G., Afghan, J.D., Anderson, G.C., 2003. Reference
materials for oceanic CO2 analysis: a method for the certification
of total alkalinity. Mar. Chem. 80, 185197.
DOE, 1994. In: Dickson, A., Goyet, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Methods
for the Analysis of the Various Parameters of the Carbon Dioxide
System in Seawater. version 2.0.
Feely, R.A., Sabine, C.L., Lee, K., Berelson, W., Kleypas, J., Fabry, V.J.,
Millero, F.J., 2004. Impact of anthropogenic CO2 on the CaCO3system in the oceans. Science 305, 362366.
Gabriel, M.D., Forja, J.M., Rubio, J.A., Gomez-Parra, A., 2005.
Temperature and salinity dependence of molar absorptivities of
thymol blue: application to the spectrophotometric determination
of pH in estuarine waters. Cienc. Mar. 31(B), 309318.
Ingle, J.D., Crouch, S.R., 1988. Spectrochemical Analysis. Prentice
Hall, New Jersey.
Lewis, E., Wallace, D.W.R., 1998. Program developed for CO2 system
calculations. ORNL/CDIAC-105, Carbon Dioxide Information
Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department
of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN.
Liu, X., Want, Z.A., Byrne,R.H., Kaltenbackher,E.A., Bernstein, R.E.,
2006. Spectrophotometric measurements of pH in-situ: laboratory
and field evaluations of instrumental performance. Environ. Sci.
Technol. 40, 50365044.
Martz, T.R., Carr, J.J., French, C.R., DeGrandpre, M.D., 2003. A
submersible autonomous sensor for spectrophotometric pHmeasurements of natural waters. Anal. Chem. 75, 18441850.
Martz, T.R., 2005. A tracer monitored titration for seawater total
alkalinity. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Montana.
Mehrbach, C., Culberson, C.H., Hawley, J.E., Pytkowicz, R.M., 1973.
Measurements of the apparent dissociation constants of carbonic
acid in seawater at atmospheric pressure. Limnol. Oceanogr. 18,
897907.
Millero, F.J., 1995. Thermodynamics of the carbon dioxide system in
the oceans. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 59, 661677.
Millero, F.J., Lee, K., Roche, M., 1998. Distribution of alkalinity in the
surface waters of the major oceans. Mar. Chem. 60, 111130.
Murphy, P.P., Feely, R.A., Wanninkhof, R., 1998. On obtaining high-
precision measurements of oceanic pCO2 using infrared analyzers.
Mar. Chem. 62, 103115.
27M.P. Seidel et al. / Marine Chemistry 109 (2008) 1828
7/27/2019 Sensor for pH DeGrandpre.pdf
11/11
Nakano, Y., Kimoto, H., Watanabe, S., Harada, K., Watanabe, Y.W.,
2006. Simultaneous vertical measurementsof in situ pH and CO2 in
the sea using spectrophotometric profilers. J. Oceanogr. 62, 7181.
Orr, J.C., et al., 2005. Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the
twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature
437, 681686.
Peng, T., Wanninkhof, R., Feely, R.A., 2003. Increase of anthropo-genic CO2 in the Pacific Ocean over the last two decades. Deep-
Sea Res. II 50, 30653082.
Sabine, C.L., Feely, A.F., Gruber, N., Key, R.M., Lee, K., Bullister, J.L.,
Wanninkhof, R., Wong, C.S.,Wallace,W.R., Tilbrook, B., Millero, F.J.,
Peng, T.H., Kozyr, T.O., Rios, A.F., 2004. The oceanic sink for
anthropogenic CO2. Science 305, 367371.
Tapp, M., Hunter, K., Currie, K., Mackaskill, B., 2000. Apparatus for
continuous-flow underway spectrophotometric measurement of
surface pH. Mar. Chem. 72, 193202.
Yuan, S., DeGrandpre, M., 2006. Comparison between two detection
systems for fiber-optic chemical sensor applications. Appl.Spectrosc. 60, 465470.
Zhang, H., Byrne, R.H., 1996. Spectrophotometric pH measurements
of surface seawater at in-situ conditions: absorbance and
protonation behavior of thymol blue. Mar. Chem. 52, 1725.
28 M.P. Seidel et al. / Marine Chemistry 109 (2008) 1828
Top Related