+ ‘reinvent raleigh’
edevelopment of the downtown warehouse district in raleigh, nc included conceptulatization and ideation of possible solutions for new construction on previously developed, infill sites. Design began with the idea of an urban canal running through the city, buliding upon existing flowlines determined through use of Arc Hydro and various other ArcGIS extensions/applications.
R
3-weeks_team of 2
edevelopment of the downtown warehouse district in raleigh, nc included conceptulatization and ideation of possible solutions for new construction on previously developed, infill sites. Design began with the idea of an urban canal running through the city, buliding upon existing flowlines determined through use of Arc Hydro and various other ArcGIS extensions/applications.
+ ideation/analysis/model building
ATLANTA BELTLINE MASTER PLAN • SEPTEMBER 27, 2010 • DRAFT SUBAREA 4
23Figure 16 - Greenspace & Public Art Plan
Mem Dr
Pmont Ave
De
Ed ood Ave SE
BillK
dyWay
Joon A
ve NE
SRou
te
Stone Mountain Fwy
Memorial Dr
BERNE ST
TYEST
GLENWOOD AV
SANDERS AV
KILLIAN ST
CAMERONST
PORTLAND AV
WALDOST
GASKILL ST
LYTLEAV
ROSALIA ST
FIELD ST
ESTORIAST
HEMLOCK CR
GIFTAV
FAITH AV
FLORIDAAV
HOLTZCLAWST
MANIGAULT ST
HARDEE ST
LOGAN ST
CHESTERAV
GLENWOODPL
MARCUS ST
PEARLST
WALTHALLST
BEREANAV
SELMANST
HANSELL ST
KENYONST
NARROW ST
FAITH AV
BRYAN ST
WILBURAV
SEABOARDAV
STOVALLST
WEATHERBYST
MARIONPL
LOOMISAV
MORTIMERST
OAKLANDAV
FULTON TE
CLEVELANDST
CUMMINGS ST
KELLYST
POWELLST
WARWICKST
MORELAND PL
TERRYST
LORING ST
WOODWARD AV
ESTENST
CARROLLST
MUSESTSE
HAMILTONST
GRANTST
GEORGEST
BARTRAMST
WRENWOOD DR
HOWELL DR
MARIONST
MARTINST
VERNONAV
GIBSONST
BOULEVARD
SE
ARKWRIGHT PL
KIRKWOOD AV
MC DONALD ST
COLMER AV
GARRETT STELOISEST
KALBSTSE
HAWTHORNE ST
OAKLANDPARK
FORTST
MOLLIE ST
TENELLE
ST
WADE ST
PICKETT ST
MILLTOWN LN
CHASTAINST
SHELTON ST
SANDERSONST
HARDENST
KIRKWOOD AV
CHESTERAV
CAMERONST
KIRKWOOD AV
WOODWARD AV
FAITH AV
B
SEABOARDAV
WOODWARD AV
POWELLST
BOULEVARDSE
I-20 WB
BEREANAV
BEREANAV
WARWICKST
PEARLST
WYLIE ST
CHEROKEEAV
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR DR
GIBSONST
SHORTST
CARROLLST
WYLIE ST
STOVALLST
WALDOST
HILLST
CHESTERAV
NORTHERN AV
FLAT SHOALS AV
SHERWOOD ST
§̈¦20
§̈¦75§̈¦85
Drawing Title
Legend
1
23
4
5
6
7
89
10
BeltLine Subarea 4:Memorial Dr/ Glenwood
800
SCALE IN FEET
Final Draft PlanExisting and ProposedGreenspace & Public ArtOpportunities
October 2010
Legend
Historic Structures
0 400
Existing Public Art
Existing Streets
Proposed Streets
Future Public Art Opportunities:
Greenspace:
Gateways and Entrances
Interpretive Installation
Streetscape Installation
Facade Installation
Environmental Installation
Landscape Installation
Infrastructure Installation
Existing Park Space
Proposed Park Space
BeltLine Corridor
WW
WEWOH
Rawson-Washington
Park
Oakland Cemetery
Hulsey Yard
Esther-PeachyLefevre Park
Lang-CarsonPark
CabbagetownPark
Tech High School
Maynard H. Jackson High School
A D
C
C
E
EA
A
A
F
A
A
A
B
C
D
E
F
Gateways and Entrances
Interpretive Installations(Examples: Historical Reclamation with cultural programming, Memorials and Monuments)
Streetscape Installation(Examples: Sidewalk Pattern and Patina Designs, Site Furnishings, Sewer- Manhole Cover Designs)
Façade installation(Examples: Murals, Retaining Walls, tunnels)
Environmental Installation(Examples: Environmental Arts, Natural Amphitheater, Water Works)
Landscape Installation(Examples: Community Gardens, arboretums)
Infrastructure Installation(Examples: Transit Stations, Pedestrian Bridges)
F
C
C
C
A
A. INTERPRETIVE
A. IN
TERP
RETI
VE
B. STREETSCAPE
B. ST
REET
SCAP
E
E. LA
NDSC
APE
A. IN
TERP
RETI
VE
E. LA
NDSC
APE
B. STREETSCAPE
ABCDEF
B. ST
REET
SCAP
E
A. INTERPRETIVE
C. FACADE
E
+ atlanta beltline subarea 4
SUBAREA 4MEMORIAL DRIVE/ GLENWOOD AVE
Atlanta BeltLine Master Plan
Plan Recommendations ReportPrepared for
Atlanta BeltLine, Inc.By Ecos Environmental Design
AECOMSmith Dalia Architects
Dovetail Consulting
Adopted by the Atlanta City Council on December XX, 2010
10.25.2010DRAFT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYSUBAREA 4
10
b. Subarea ContextSubarea 4 is located in the southeastern portion of Atlanta BeltLine, east of I-75/I-85 and bisected by I-20. It is bounded by DeKalb Avenue to the north, Moreland Avenue to the east, and Berne Street to the south (see Figures 1 and 2). The study area is centered on the Atlanta BeltLine corridor and generally includes the land within one-half mile of either side. The study area encompasses over 1,200 acres and includes 415 acres of the BeltLine Tax Allocation District.
Subarea 4 incorporates several Neighborhood Planning Units (NPUs), City Council Districts, and neighborhoods, including portions of:
• Southeast Study Group.• NPUs N, O, and W.• City Council Districts 1 and 5.• Neighborhoods of Cabbagetown,
Capital Gateway, Edgewood, Grant Park, Ormewood Park, and Reynoldstown.
The study area includes four signifi cant redevelopment focus areas containing numerous abandoned or underutilized properties, along with properties that may transition away from industrial over the next 20 years. Each of the focus areas presents opportunities for transit-oriented redevelopment at the appropriate scale and with appropriate transitions to the existing single-family neighborhoods. A synopsis of the recommendations for each focus area begins on page 32.
Subarea 4 includes two major physical barriers: Interstate 20 and the CSX Hulsey Yard intermodal transfer facility. Both present challenges for connectivity and require special attention around their edges from land use, mobility, air quality and noise pollution perspectives.
Figure 02 - Subarea 4 Context Map
ATLANTA BELTLINE MASTER PLAN • October 22, 2010 • DRAFT SUBAREA 4
13
• Provide a safe, effi cient and continuous network of pedestrian and bicycle facilities as part of all planned streetscape and roadway improvements for improved access to transit and better health of the community.
• Maintain and improve traffi c fl ow along the major thoroughfares of Memorial Drive, Moreland Avenue, Boulevard and DeKalb Avenue, while employing appropriate safety measures, improving accessibility to local businesses, and meeting the parking needs of the community.
Greenspace and Public and Cultural Arts Goals• Ensure the livability of the subarea by
improving the accessibility and quality of parks, open spaces and recreational opportunities, enhancing streetscapes, preserving cultural and historic assets and integrating a public arts program.
• Provide diverse, open, cultural, and civic spaces to promote social interaction, celebrate local art, improve community health, and retain distinctive neighborhood character.
e. Plan Summary: Land Use and DesignThe Subarea 4 Master Plan encourages a variety of uses that refl ect community character through quality architecture, preservation of historic resources, open spaces and cohesive streetscape design, while providing the appropriate transitions to established neighborhoods. The master plan promotes connectivity and encourages safe, walkable pedestrian and vehicular networks.
Key land use and design policies and strategies include:• Encourage repurposing of historic structures
without compromising the physical character of the resource to embrace and celebrate the subarea’s unique character and historic contributions to the City of Atlanta.
• Recommend priority storefront spaces where appropriate to create a vibrant, walkable commercial corridors that facilitate economic growth and improve the vitality of the streetscapes.
• Provide appropriate transitions to existing residential neighborhoods. Higher intensities are located around transit stations (to provide ridership and ‘eyes on the BeltLine’ for improved safety) and along major corridors, with the recommendation that these heights and intensities gradually reduce, or ‘step down’ when adjacent to or across from the existing single-family residential areas.
• Create smaller blocks within existing superblocks and reestablish former street connections, where appropriate.
The following section, which is organized into four focus areas, illustrates specifi c development opportunities within the study area.
Reynoldstown Focus AreaThe land use recommendations for the Reynoldstown Focus Area encourage a lower intensity, neighborhood character within the existing Reynoldstown neighborhood, while providing for higher intensity uses near existing and future transit. This includes the following public and private sector actions:
Figure 04 - Reynoldstown Focus Area Land Use Plan
ATLANTA BELTLINE MASTER PLAN • October 22, 2010 • DRAFT SUBAREA 4
15
Figure 06 - Memorial Drive Focus Area Land Use Plan
Figure 07 - Memorial Drive Focus Area Illustration
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYSUBAREA 4
16
Moreland/Memorial Focus AreaLocated at the intersection of Moreland Avenue and Memorial Drive, the land use recommendations focus on reconnecting the street grid and modifying the existing land uses so that the area may better function as a mixed-use node adjacent to the interstate.• Provide for mixed-use, low density commercial,
and some residential redevelopment around the intersection.
• Overhaul the intersection of Arkwright/Memorial/I-20 and Moreland Avenue.
• If the existing LaFarge operation relocates, allow residential and offi ce redevelopment and require the introduction of new streets while protecting the multi-use trail along Chester Avenue.
• Utilize the forest and school yard around the historic Atlanta Stockade as publicly accessible parkspace, leveraging its uniqueness as a cultural resource.
Glenwood Focus AreaThe land use recommendations for the Glenwood Focus Area support and enhance the existing retail uses at Glenwood Park by expanding residential, offi ce, open space and community facility opportunities in the area.• Identify priority storefront space at the
intersection of Glenwood Avenue and Bill Kennedy Way to enhance the existing retail node at Glenwood Park.
Figure 09 - Glenwood Station Area Plan
Figure 08 - Moreland/ Memorial Focus Area Land Use Plan
Existing LaFarge Property
ATLANTA BELTLINE MASTER PLAN • October 22, 2010 • DRAFT SUBAREA 4
17
Figure 10 - Glenwood Focus Area Land Use Plan
Figure 11 - Glenwood Focus Area Illustration
ATLANTA BELTLINE MASTER PLAN • SEPTEMBER 27, 2010 • DRAFT SUBAREA 4
23Figure 16 - Greenspace & Public Art Plan
Mem Dr
Pmont Ave
De
Ed ood Ave SE
BillK
dyWay
Joon A
ve NE
SRou
te
Stone Mountain Fwy
Memorial Dr
BERNE ST
TYEST
GLENWOOD AV
SANDERS AV
KILLIAN ST
CAMERONST
PORTLAND AV
WALDOST
GASKILL ST
LYTLEAV
ROSALIA ST
FIELD ST
ESTORIAST
HEMLOCK CR
GIFTAV
FAITH AV
FLORIDAAV
HOLTZCLAWST
MANIGAULT ST
HARDEE ST
LOGAN ST
CHESTERAV
GLENWOODPL
MARCUS ST
PEARLST
WALTHALLST
BEREANAV
SELMANST
HANSELL ST
KENYONST
NARROW ST
FAITH AV
BRYAN ST
WILBURAV
SEABOARDAV
STOVALLST
WEATHERBYST
MARIONPL
LOOMISAV
MORTIMERST
OAKLANDAV
FULTON TE
CLEVELANDST
CUMMINGS ST
KELLYST
POWELLST
WARWICKST
MORELAND PL
TERRYST
LORING ST
WOODWARD AV
ESTENST
CARROLLST
MUSESTSE
HAMILTONST
GRANTST
GEORGEST
BARTRAMST
WRENWOOD DR
HOWELL DR
MARIONST
MARTINST
VERNONAV
GIBSONST
BOULEVARD
SE
ARKWRIGHT PL
KIRKWOOD AV
MC DONALD ST
COLMER AV
GARRETT ST
ELOISEST
KALBSTSE
HAWTHORNE ST
OAKLANDPARK
FORTST
MOLLIE ST
TENELLE
ST
WADE ST
PICKETT ST
MILLTOWN LN
CHASTAINST
SHELTON ST
SANDERSONST
HARDENST
KIRKWOOD AV
CHESTERAV
CAMERONST
KIRKWOOD AV
WOODWARD AV
FAITH AV
B
SEABOARDAV
WOODWARD AV
POWELLST
BOULEVARDSE
I-20 WB
BEREANAV
BEREANAV
WARWICKST
PEARLST
WYLIE ST
CHEROKEEAV
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR DR
GIBSONST
SHORTST
CARROLLST
WYLIE ST
STOVALLST
WALDOST
HILLST
CHESTERAV
NORTHERN AV
FLAT SHOALS AV
SHERWOOD ST
§̈¦20
§̈¦75§̈¦85
Drawing Title
Legend
1
23
4
5
6
7
89
10
BeltLine Subarea 4:Memorial Dr/ Glenwood
800
SCALE IN FEET
Final Draft PlanExisting and ProposedGreenspace & Public ArtOpportunities
October 2010
Legend
Historic Structures
0 400
Existing Public Art
Existing Streets
Proposed Streets
Future Public Art Opportunities:
Greenspace:
Gateways and Entrances
Interpretive Installation
Streetscape Installation
Facade Installation
Environmental Installation
Landscape Installation
Infrastructure Installation
Existing Park Space
Proposed Park Space
BeltLine Corridor
WW
WEWOH
Rawson-Washington
Park
Oakland Cemetery
Hulsey Yard
Esther-PeachyLefevre Park
Lang-CarsonPark
CabbagetownPark
Tech High School
Maynard H. Jackson High School
A D
C
C
E
EA
A
A
F
A
A
A
B
C
D
E
F
Gateways and Entrances
Interpretive Installations(Examples: Historical Reclamation with cultural programming, Memorials and Monuments)
Streetscape Installation(Examples: Sidewalk Pattern and Patina Designs, Site Furnishings, Sewer- Manhole Cover Designs)
Façade installation(Examples: Murals, Retaining Walls, tunnels)
Environmental Installation(Examples: Environmental Arts, Natural Amphitheater, Water Works)
Landscape Installation(Examples: Community Gardens, arboretums)
Infrastructure Installation(Examples: Transit Stations, Pedestrian Bridges)
F
C
C
C
A
A. INTERPRETIVE
A. IN
TERP
RETI
VE
B. STREETSCAPE
B. ST
REET
SCAP
E
E. LA
NDSC
APE
A. IN
TERP
RETI
VE
E. LA
NDSC
APE
B. STREETSCAPE
ABCDEF
B. ST
REET
SCAP
E
A. INTERPRETIVE
C. FACADE
E
9-month planning process
+ fu
ture
land
use
reco
mm
enda
tions
repo
rt
City of East Point Parks and Recreation Master Plan I 66
Recommendations
Reco
mm
enda
tions
Figure 23 - Proposed Facilities Plan
City of East Point Parks and Recreation Master Plan I 116
Prioritization
Prio
ritiz
atio
n
Figure 40 - 10-Year Action Plan
City of East Point Parks and Recreation Master Plan I 49
Needs Assessment
Nee
ds A
sses
smen
t
Figure 17 - Benchmark Comparison by City and Facility Type
-16-14-14
-10-8
-10
-5-3 -3-3-3
-2
-6Swim
min
g Po
ol
Spla
sh P
ad
Wat
er P
ark
Tenn
is (b
y pa
rk o
fferi
ng)
Bask
etba
ll C
ourt
Base
ball/
Softb
all F
ield
s
Socc
er
Rec
reat
ion
Cen
ter
Volle
ybal
l
Foot
ball
Play
grou
nd
Picn
ic A
rea
Nat
ural
/ Wet
land
Are
a
Boat
ing/
Fis
hing
Gar
deni
ng
arbo
retu
m)
Skat
e Pa
rk
Gol
f Cou
rse
Com
mun
ity C
ente
r
How do our facilities compare?
This chart compares current City of East Pointp yfacilities to other cities across the country. It alsos e oshows 20202 extreme deficitse t that couldoccur over the next 10 yearso if not addressedabased on NPRA recommendations.o m*projections for this comparison based on US Census 2006 Community S urvey
-10
-15
-5
0
5
-1-2
+1 +1
-2-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1-4-5 -4
10
15
20
25
30
35
40Lombard Park, ILTemple, TXX
Benchmark Median
East Point, GA
Elmhurst, ILElmhurst, ILIIChapel Hill, NCl
Deficit
Hor
ticul
ture
(gre
enho
use,
-1
City of East Point Parks & Recreation Master Plan I 11
Executive Summary
Exec
utiv
e Su
mm
ary
Brookdale Park was recently renovated and is located within Ward B.
Executive SummaryOverview & Methodology
The city of East Point Parks and Recrea�on Master Plan Update for 2011 through 2020 is the result of a 6-month, community-based planning process. Contribu�ng factors towarddesign of the master plan include:
• an in-depth needs assessment for the city of East Point based on comparison to Na�onal Recrea�on and Park Associa�on Guidelines (NRPA) and a benchmark median established through comparison to other communi�es throughout the country;
• a community-wide survey;
• evalua�on of connec�vity and exis�ng level of service (LOS) within the city; and
• assessment of exis�ng natural features, facili�es and ameni�es throughout the community
The purpose of this plan is to measure the adequacy of recrea�onal ameni�es, facili�es and services currently provided within the city of East Point, while providing recommenda�ons for future planning and capital improvements through a 10-Year Ac�on Plan, aligning with the community’s mission and vision for the future.
Context
The city of East Point can be categorized as a “small, urban city” located in the southwest por�on of Fulton County, Georgia. It is comprised of approximately 13.8 square miles of land, including 163.9 acres of city-owned parks and greenspace (1.9% of total land area). With a current popula�on of approximately 44,704, the city of East Point is projected to consist of over 50,000 residents by 2020.
The city of East Point is divided into four different Wards: A, B, C, & D. Based on popula�on and household distribu�on by census tract, most people live in Ward C, while the economic center and Main Street of the city straddles Wards A and B. Ward D is more dense in the northeastern por�on, but consists predominately of office and distribu�on centers in the south, with residents distributed along the edges.
26 I City of East Point Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
Figure 11 - City of East Point N
atural Features
City of East Point Parks and Recreation Master Plan I 116
Prioritization
Prio
ritiz
atio
n
Figure 40 - 10-Year Action Plan
§̈ ¦285
HIGHW
AY 29
HIG
HW
AY 29
City
of L
ilbur
n
You are
here
Norc
ross
ROCK
BRID
GE
RD
INDI
A
N TRAIL ROAD
BEAVER RUIN ROAD
PLEASANT HILL ROAD
KILLIAN HILL ROAD
RON
ALD
REA
GAN
PARK
WAY
LAW
RENCEVILLE
LESTER
DICKENS
HARBINS
ARCADO
OAK
MAIN
LAKE
VALLEY
KILLIAN HILL
HILLCREST
HO
OD
CHU
RCH
JOH
NS
JAY
LUXOMNI
LISA
VELV
A
CART
ER
JOD
Y
SHADY
LULA
POPL
AR
CREE
KVIE
W
TERRY
SHEL
LEY
LAN
DR
ESS
INLAND
IND
IAN
TRA
ILLI
LBU
RN
HOLLY RIDGE
WYN
NERUSS
ELL
DOGWOOD
JON JEFF
LILB
URN
IND
UST
RIA
L
SUNFIELD
TAM
BEC
FIRST
ROCKBRIDGE
WIND
SAFE
HAV
EN
SWEE
TWAT
ER
YOU
NG
HARVARD
SANDRA
SHEI
LA
PINE
RONALD REAGAN
RAJE
AN
LILBURN SCHOOL
GREENWOOD
ROSEST
ONE
TIM
OTH
Y
BERKMAN
PLEASANT HILL
NO
RMAN
CANDLEWICK
MANCHEST
ER
CAN
DA
JAN
ET
MAU
RICE
HA
LBER
T
MO
SSY
OLD MANOR
CATHEY
NAT
HA
N
RRPE EX RP-LH
ARROWIND
JOHN CARROLL
REM
ING
TON
CED
AR
POP
JOH
NSO
N
CHANEY
BEAVER RUIN
EDITH
WHITE OAK
RAILROAD
SARANN
BASKETTE
RRPW ON RP-LH
WAY
SID
E
SPRINGWOOD
JACKSONSHOALS
LAKE
RID
GE
STONEV
IEW
INDIA
NLA
KE
BERK
MA
R
RESTHAVEN
HAV
ERFO
RDM
ILL
HARBINS COVE
BIRDLAKE
CARD
INA
L
RRPE
ON
RP-L
H
RIVE
RPO
INTE
PICKWICK
BUSINESS
KEN
ERLY
GASTON
BRANDLWOOD
ARC
AD
IAIN
DU
STR
IAL
SUMMERRIDGE
LUCILE
COBB
LEST
ON
E
FOREST
GLEN
DICKS
JOHNSTON OAK
PARKCROSSING
POSTAL
JACK
SON
LOLA
MISTY MEADOW
OLI
VER
FALL
ING
LEAF
HALFMOON
MAEBELLE
ASHFORD COVE
LEST
ERW
OO
DS
GIN
A
SCARSBOROUGH
JACKSONPOINT
DURHAMRID
GE
BRADLEY WOODS
SUG
ARB
ROO
K
PEN
ROD
RRPW
EXRP-
LH
STER
LIN
GTR
ACE
REEDER
WINDEMERE OAK
HAV
ERFO
RDRU
N
LAN
DR
ESS
PARK
EXCHANGE
ENG
LISH
OA
KS
DURHAM VIEW
BOW
ERS
POIN
TE
HARBINSPOIN
T
GARNER
FATH
ERCHA
RCO
AL
MEA
DO
WLA
RK
MO
DEE
N
SCHAPPETT
PEBB
LEPO
INTE
WOODCLIFF
JENNIFER
MARBLE SPRINGS
COU
RTLI
N
CLOVERWOOD
GRE
ENLE
AF
BUSI
NES
SPA
RK
BEAVERWOOD
JACK
SON
BLUFF
KELL
YSM
ILL
PIN
ESH
AD
OW
JACK
SONS M
ILL
CORA
OA
KLE
AF
CHIN
ABE
RRY
VAN
KIRK
SUN
NYD
ALE
KYLMAN
WEST JOHNS
BARN
ABY
BERK
MA
RSC
HO
OL
CLIFFGLEN
LEEA
MBUR
STAFF
ORD
STERLINGOAKS
JACK
SON
BRO
OK
HOUNDSTOOTH
WINDFIELDGLEN
WAL
NUT
CREE
K
COPP
ERFI
ELD
HO
LLY
VIL
LAG
E
DILLARD
COU
RTI
NG
JIMNASH
HAVEN
CRES
TW
ALK
CHU
ZZLE
WIT
SAFE
HAV
EN
NATHAN
SWEETWATER
STER
LIN
GTR
ACE
LAW
REN
CEVI
LLE
NATHAN
CREE
KVIE
W
JOHNS
POPLAR
RONAL
DRE
AGAN
HARBINS
JODY
BEAV
ERW
OO
D
¯0
200
400
600
800
100
Feet
This project centered on a 4.5 mile highway corriodor located in Lilburn, Georgia. While it was not awarded Livable Community Initiative funding, the community wanted the ability to have it adopted as an LCI. As a result, planning and design for the project followed an LCI-type process centered on community development and placemaking concepts throughout the corridor.
HIGHWAY 29CORRIDOR STUDY
_corridor aerial_context map_meeting/vision tour photos
on this page:
§̈ ¦285
HIGHW
AY 29
HIG
HW
AY 29
City
of L
ilbur
n
You are
here
Norc
ross
ROCK
BRID
GE
RD
INDI
A
N TRAIL ROAD
BEAVER RUIN ROAD
PLEASANT HILL ROAD
KILLIAN HILL ROAD
RON
ALD
REA
GAN
PARK
WAY
vision tour
community meeting
existing conditions mapping
_community facilities + cultural resources
_environmental conditions
_ex
isti
ng
lan
d u
se
_natural resources
_ex
isti
ng
zon
ing
+ 2009 ULI Competition_denver, colorado
ALAMEDA ALAMEDA
BAYAUDBAYAUD
1ST1ST
BRO
ADW
AYBR
OAD
WAY
BRO
ADW
AY
BYERS
CEDAR
MAPLE
ELLSWORTH
BAN
NO
CK
LIN
CO
LN
LOG
AN
CH
ERO
KEE
VIRGINIA
CUSTER
CENTER
GILL
MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI
LIPA
N
JASO
N
OHIO
ALYS
ADA
ERB
ALASKA
NEVADA
DAKOTA
VIRGINIA
LIN
CO
LN
SHER
MAN
GR
ANT
LOG
ANLO
GAN
PEN
NSY
LVAN
IAPE
NN
SYLV
ANIA
PEN
NSY
LVAN
IA
PEAR
LPE
ARL
PEAR
L
WAS
HIN
GTO
NW
ASH
ING
TON
WAS
HIN
GTO
N
CLA
RKS
ON
CLA
RKS
ON
CLA
RKS
ON
EMER
SON
EMER
SON
EMER
SON
OG
DEN
OG
DEN
CO
RO
NA
CO
RO
NA
DO
WN
ING
CENTER
EXPOSITION
OHIO
KENTUCKY KENTUCKY
OHIO
ALAMEDA
DAKOTA
CENTER
EXPOSITION
NewPark
BroadwayPark
HabitatPark
Pedestrian Bridge
ValverdePark
DaileyPark
Platte River
Platte River
VanderbiltPark
BroadwayPark
WashingtonPark
+ part two_small area plan + urban design
urba
n ag
ricul
ture
brid
ge
open
law
n
urba
n st
ream
urban street redesign
wat
ersh
ed c
omm
uniti
es a
s pa
rt o
f urb
an c
onex
t
+ brownfield remediation studio
3brownfield studio l wye station
technology
Arsenic Hyper-Accumulators Lead Hyper-Accumulators Petroleum Hyper-AccumulatorsAgrostis castellana :Bent GrassAmbrosia artemisiifolia :RagweedArmeria maritima : Seapink ThriftAthyrium yokoscense : Japanese false spleenwortAzolla filiculoides : Pacific mosquitofern Bacopa monnieri : Smooth Water HyssopBrassica napus : Rapeseed plantBrassica oleracea : Ornemental KaleBrassica juncea : Indian MustardCallisneria Americana : Tape GrassEichhornia crassipes : Water HyacinthFestuca ovina : Blue Sheep FescueHelianthus annuus : SunflowerThlaspi rotundifolium : PennycressTriticum aestivum : Wheat (scout)Poplar
Pteris vittata L.: Ladder brake fernHelianthus annuus : SunflowerAgrostis capillaris L. : Bent GrassAgrostis castellana : Bent GrassAgrostis tenerrima Trin. : Colonial bentgrassSarcosphaera coronariaPoplar : Tulip
Cynodon dactylon : Bermuda grassFestuca arundinacea : Tall fescuePinus ponderosa : Ponderosa PineSalix : Weeping Willow, Black WillowPoplar : Tulip,
Spray Application
LeachateCollection
Low Permeability Zone
Contaminated Area GroundwaterExtraction
Well
Water Table
FlushingAdditives
GroundwaterTreatment
Pump Pump
Air Compressor
SVEAir Sparging Well
vapors
Contamination Plume
Air Channel
Vapor
Treatment
Nutrients
Static Water Table
InjectionWell
GroundwaterFlow
MonitoringWell
ExtractionWell
GroundwaterTreatmentOxygen Enhancement
System
5 Years2 Years
Process where soil is saturated through irrigation in order to carry contaminants to extraction points where it is treated above ground.
Process where contaminated soil is removed and dumped o� site, and then replaced with clean �ll and topsoil.
Process where air is injected into the contaminated zone. Bubbles collect pollutants and carry them into a vapor extraction system to be cleaned.
Process in which degradation of toxic compounds using microorganisms results in their conversion into non-toxic substances such as Carbon Dioxide and Water.
The engineered use of plants to remove or control contaminants, or to foster contaminant breakdown by microorganisms within the plant.
Air Sparging :
Phytoremediation :
Bioremediation :
Land Filling :
Soil Flushing :
$50-100
$100-$500
$75-$90
$100-$500
$25-$100
10 Years Cost per ton of soil
Impacted Soil
ImpactedGroundwater
Remediated Soil
Transpired Water
RemediatedGroundwater
3brownfield studio l wye station
technology
Arsenic Hyper-Accumulators Lead Hyper-Accumulators Petroleum Hyper-AccumulatorsAgrostis castellana :Bent GrassAmbrosia artemisiifolia :RagweedArmeria maritima : Seapink ThriftAthyrium yokoscense : Japanese false spleenwortAzolla filiculoides : Pacific mosquitofern Bacopa monnieri : Smooth Water HyssopBrassica napus : Rapeseed plantBrassica oleracea : Ornemental KaleBrassica juncea : Indian MustardCallisneria Americana : Tape GrassEichhornia crassipes : Water HyacinthFestuca ovina : Blue Sheep FescueHelianthus annuus : SunflowerThlaspi rotundifolium : PennycressTriticum aestivum : Wheat (scout)Poplar
Pteris vittata L.: Ladder brake fernHelianthus annuus : SunflowerAgrostis capillaris L. : Bent GrassAgrostis castellana : Bent GrassAgrostis tenerrima Trin. : Colonial bentgrassSarcosphaera coronariaPoplar : Tulip
Cynodon dactylon : Bermuda grassFestuca arundinacea : Tall fescuePinus ponderosa : Ponderosa PineSalix : Weeping Willow, Black WillowPoplar : Tulip,
Spray Application
LeachateCollection
Low Permeability Zone
Contaminated Area GroundwaterExtraction
Well
Water Table
FlushingAdditives
GroundwaterTreatment
Pump Pump
Air Compressor
SVEAir Sparging Well
vapors
Contamination Plume
Air Channel
Vapor
Treatment
Nutrients
Static Water Table
InjectionWell
GroundwaterFlow
MonitoringWell
ExtractionWell
GroundwaterTreatmentOxygen Enhancement
System
5 Years2 Years
Process where soil is saturated through irrigation in order to carry contaminants to extraction points where it is treated above ground.
Process where contaminated soil is removed and dumped o� site, and then replaced with clean �ll and topsoil.
Process where air is injected into the contaminated zone. Bubbles collect pollutants and carry them into a vapor extraction system to be cleaned.
Process in which degradation of toxic compounds using microorganisms results in their conversion into non-toxic substances such as Carbon Dioxide and Water.
The engineered use of plants to remove or control contaminants, or to foster contaminant breakdown by microorganisms within the plant.
Air Sparging :
Phytoremediation :
Bioremediation :
Land Filling :
Soil Flushing :
$50-100
$100-$500
$75-$90
$100-$500
$25-$100
10 Years Cost per ton of soil
Impacted Soil
ImpactedGroundwater
Remediated Soil
Transpired Water
RemediatedGroundwater
phasing and process
+ nc
sta
te, c
olle
ge o
f nat
ural
reso
urce
s
+ my sketchbook
+ id
eatin
g an
d co
ncep
tual
izin
g
+ interior designPrior to pursuing a career in landscape architeture and urban planning/GIS, I worked as an interior designer. As a result, I am better able to understand scale and space, and strive to envision myself in the environments I create.
_sports medicine clinic
+ ha
nd re
nder
ing
stud
ies
_before
_before
_before
_after
_after
_after
Top Related