Minimizing Peak Wait time at the Union Taco Bell
IE 475 – Simulation
Term Project
Vijayendra ViswanathanIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering
UW-Milwaukee.
Overview
• Introduction
• Detailed System Description
• Data Collection and Modeling Issues
• The Model
• Output Analysis and Conclusion
Introduction
• Aim to reduce wait time at the Union Taco bell during peak time
• Simulation used to build a replica of the real world scenario
• Results Analyzed and an alternate model was proposed
• Alternate model validated using Simulation• Resulted in an 86% reduction in wait time
without any additional investment in either personnel or other resources.
System Description
• Employs 6 people for restaurant operations
• Two parallel assembly lines
• 3 people on each line– Steamer– Stuffer– Expediter
• 2 Grills, one on each line
Schematic of Restaurant Set-up
Grill 1
Steamer 1 Stuffer 1 Expediter 1
Steamer 2 Stuffer 2 Expediter 2
Grill 2
Take Orders Deliver Orders
Some Modeling Issues
• System Boundaries– A customer enters the system, when he/she joins the queue at
the restaurant, and exits the system, when he/she leaves the delivery area with his meal.
• Scope of the Model– This model considers only peak time. i.e; between 12:00 and
1:30 everyday which is when, the restaurant is most busy. – At other times, there is virtually zero waiting time, as the
passenger arrivals are slow enough that they can all be served immediately on arrival.
– As such, it makes sense to only study and analyze this system through simulation, in peak time.
Data Collection
• Inter-arrival time: Personally recorded the arrival times of customers during peak-time on two different days, for half hour. – Then, Inter-arrival times were calculated by
subtracting each arrival time from the previous one.– raw inter-arrival times fit into a best-fit probability
distribution using the Input Analyzer Module in ARENA. [tools>fit>fit all]
– best-fit distribution :• -0.5 + 74 * BETA (0.25, 0.881) seconds.
Data Collection
Preparation time of different items – talked to the Manager of the restaurant, Ms. Lucy who
has been running the restaurant for the past 5 years as also some of the employees who have working in the restaurant for sometime now.
– Used TRIA to model ranges of values.
Data Collection
• choice of entrée during lunch-time [Spoke to Manager to obtain this data.]
– approx. 30% - “Crunchwrap-Supreme + Taco”
– 25% - “Chicken/Cheese Quesadilla + Taco”,– “Cheesy gordita crunch” - 20% of orders. – Rest 25% was other miscellaneous orders.
• Discrete distribution used to model this information, using the preparation times obtained earlier.
• Miscellaneous orders modeled as “3 soft tacos”, which represents a typical order well, in terms of preparation time
Type -1
Type -2
Type -3
Type -4
The Model• Screenshot
Output Analysis and Conclusions
• Basic Run– 100 Replications– Warm-up time of half hour– Run length = 2 hrs.
• Results:– Average VA Time: 53.58 s.– Average Wait time of a Customer: 59.95 s.– Average Total time spent by a Customer in the system: 113.54 s– Average Wait time on Line 1: 56.05 s– Average Wait time on Line 2: 56.07 s– Average Wait time on both lines: 51.93 s– Flowtime – Order type -1: 115.01s– Flowtime – Order Type-2: 110.56s– Flowtime – Order Type-3:115.11s– Flowtime – Order Type-4:113.74s
Modifications
• Assign all orders that require grilling to line-1 and all orders that don’t to line-2.
• Put both grills on line-1, since line 2 now only processes orders that don’t require grilling.
• Expected to reduce wait time and make process more efficient
Results – Modified Model
• Average VA Time: 41.75 Seconds.• Average Wait time of a Customer: 49.6 Seconds.• Average Total time spent by a Customer in the system:
113.54 Seconds• Average Wait time on Line 1: 7.65 s• Average Wait time on Line 2: 7.59 s• Average Wait time on both lines: 7.20 s• Flowtime – Order type -1: 65.86s• Flowtime – Order Type-2: 61.99s• Flowtime – Order Type-3:31.68s• Flowtime – Order Type-4:31.67s
Summary
• 86.14% reduction in average wait time• 4 more customers served in the modified model
compared to the base model.• Represents an increased profit of $1872 per
year, just for the 2 hour peak period.• This doesn't take into account the increased rate
of arrivals due to reduced wait time• No extra investment in either people or capital
The End
Questions?
Top Related