Download - Lf Master Plan

Transcript
Page 1: Lf Master Plan

2006-2011

Lahore FortMaster Plan

United NationsEducational, Scientific and

Cultural Organization

A project of Norway funds-in-trust

Page 2: Lf Master Plan
Page 3: Lf Master Plan

Produced and published byUNESCO Islamabad

2006

Prepared and written byDr. Pamela Rogers and Yasmeen Lari

Lahore Fort Master Plan2006-2011

Page 4: Lf Master Plan

Copyright © 2006 UNESCO, Islamabad

Materials in this report may be reproduced for

non-profit purposes, provided acknowledgment

of the source is made.

This publication is available at:

UNESCO Office

1 Floor, Saudi Pak Tower

Blue Area, P.O. Box: 2034

Islamabad Pakistan

Tel: (92-51) 2800080-83-84

Fax: (92-51) 2800056

e-mail:[email protected]

Website: www.un.org.pk/unesco

Printed at:

Format Designers & Printers

Lahore - Pakistan

st

Page 5: Lf Master Plan

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The Lahore Fort Master plan was prepared as part of the UNESCO NORADby a team comprising:

International Consultant

National ConsultantUNESCO National Advisor, Lahore Fort Project

Specialist ContributorsMember, UNESCO Technical Committee,Lahore Fort Project

Member, UNESCO Technical Committee,Lahore Fort Project

Member, UNESCO Technical Committee,Lahore Fort Project

Former UNESCO Regional Advisor for Culturein Asia & the Pacific and Former Director Generalof Archaeology & Museums, Government of Pakistan

Heritage Foundation Pakistan

UNESCO Project Documentation Centre,Federal Department of Archaeology and Museums

Valuable input was provided at the commencement of the project by those attending the 1stand 2nd Experts Meeting at Lahore Fort, August 2003. In depth discussions and valuable inputduring the course of preparing the Master Plan were provided by:

National Project Coordinator, Lahore Fort ProjectDirector, Northern Circle, Federal Department of Archaeology and Museums

Deputy National Project Coordinator, Lahore Fort ProjectSenior Architect, Federal Department of Archaeology and Museums

Senior Advisor International AffairsDirectorate for Cultural Heritage, Rikstanikvaren, Norway

Officers and Staff of the Federal Department of Archaeology and Museums, Northern Circle,Lahore Fort and the UNESCO NORAD Project Documentation Centre, Lahore Fort.

Project for theConservation and Preservation of Lahore Fort

Dr. Pamela Rogers

Yasmeen Lari

Dr. Mahmood Hussain

Fauzia Qureshi

Sajida Haider Vandal

Dr. M. Ishtiaq Khan,

Mr. Saleemul Haq

Mr. Maqsood Ahmad Malik

Mr. Lyder Marstrander

Page 6: Lf Master Plan
Page 7: Lf Master Plan

FOREWORD

The Shalamar Gardens and Lahore Fort are masterpieces of art and architecture dating

back to the Mughal period, which was at its height during the reign of Emperor Shah

Jahan (1628-1658). The structures within the Lahore Fort include marble palaces and

mosques decorated with mosaics and gilt. The elegance of the Shalamar Gardens, built

near the city of Lahore on three terraces with lodges, waterfalls and ornamental ponds,

is unequalled.

Unfortunately, the hydraulic system of the Gardens built around 375 years ago was

destroyed in June 1999 to widen the road which borders the gardens on their South

side. Around the same time, there was a real risk that Shish Mahal ceiling might

collapse. In view of the damage observed and the threat facing the two sites, the World

Heritage Committee decided to inscribe the Lahore World Heritage site in the List of

World Heritage Sites in Danger.

UNESCO obtained funds from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) Norway, the

World Heritage Centre (UNESCO Headquarters) and the Getty Foundation (USA) for

emergency work to be carried out in both sites. Funds from the Norway Government

were used for the stabilization of Shish Mahal ceiling, the Akbari Gateway, Imperial

Kitchens and the Pictured Wall. A Master Plan for the conservation and preservation of

the Lahore Fort was also developed.

The Getty Foundation support was utilized for baseline surveys at the Shalamar

Gardens with a view to facilitating the conservation process. The findings of the studies

laid down the basis for the development of a Master Plan for the Shalamar Gardens.

They also served as a source of information for the Punjab Government to undertake

conservation work at the Gardens.

UNESCO wishes to thank the Federal Ministry of Culture and the Provincial Ministry

of Culture, Punjab, for their continuous support and cooperation. The dynamic

leadership of the respective Secretaries, Mr. Jalil Abbas and Mr. Taimur Azmat Osman,

has been instrumental in successfully achieving the project objectives.

I hope very sincerely that these efforts will be instrumental in getting the Lahore World

Heritage sites removed from the list of World Heritage Sites in Danger.

Jorge SequeiraDirector/Representative

Page 8: Lf Master Plan
Page 9: Lf Master Plan

PREFACE

Culture in Pakistan is enriched with influences and resources of ancient civilizations

that flourished in the region over centuries. The historical and archaeological treasures

inherited by Pakistan are now being increasingly recognized and appreciated outside

the country.

The Lahore Fort and Shalamar Gardens are examples of Mughal architecture,

landscaping and craftsmanship at its pools. The two sites were inscribed together in

UNESCO's World Heritage List as one site, in 1981, for their outstanding universal

value. Due to a general lack of awareness, a lot of encroachments appeared and other

environmental factors resulted in damage to these sites. Critical condition of the Shish

Mahal ceiling in the Lahore Fort, also contributed to placing of Lahore Fort and

Shalamar Gardens on the list of World Heritage in Danger in the year 2000. Since then

both the sites attracted attention of international community, which appreciably

volunteered to safeguard these Monumental Treasure.

With funding from Norway, UNESCO is executing a project, “Conservation and

Preservation of Lahore Fort”, which will conclude in October, 2006. Preparation of a

Master Plan for Lahore Fort was an important component of the project, besides

rehabilitating the Shish Mahal ceiling. Both objectives were successfully achieved

during the first phase of the project.

Parallel to the Lahore Fort Project, UNESCO sought funds from Getty Foundation;

USA and baseline studies were undertaken. The findings were compiled and used as

the basis for development of a Maser Plan for Shalamar Gardens. The two Master

documents, prepared by a team of highly competent national and international

experts, will serve as reference documents and as a 'ready to implement' plan of action

up to 2011 and beyond.

After transfer of these two monuments to the Government of the Punjab (Pakistan) on

18th August, 2004 we are dedicatedly pursuing to improve the condition of both the

monuments to make them alluring for the visitors and beautiful in its appearance. This

is an admitted fact that more damage was done to the monuments by environmental

factors. Government of the Punjab on the basis of recommendations of experts who

have worked for this Master Plan, have developed two different implementation

documents worth Rs. 300 Million each for Shalamar Gardens and Lahore Fort. Work on

Page 10: Lf Master Plan

improvement of lawns at both the places/sites is already in progress. The environment

of Lahore Fort from two sides is being cleared from a number of encroachments, traffic,

electric pools etc. bringing this back to its original outlook. Same efforts are underway

in Shalamar Gardens and the most neglected area of “Naqar Khana” is being restored

back to its old glory.

We are grateful to UNESCO for its interest and support, which facilitated the Punjab

Government to pursue its goals. The projects enabled training and capacity building of

the relevant staff of Punjab Archaeology Department in documentation, conservation,

project management, monitoring and evaluation. Consequently, the two sites are being

looked after and maintained by trained and knowledgeable personnel of the Punjab

Government.

The Master Plan is a comprehensive document, the implementation of which will

ensure preservation of the World Heritage site and educate the public at large

regarding the significance and value of the country's cultural heritage. Above all, we

hope that by following the direction provided by this user-friendly document, we

would be able to get the two sites off the list of World Heritage in Danger.

Taimur Azmat OsmanSecretaryInformation, Culture & Youth Affairs

Department Government of the Punjab

Page 11: Lf Master Plan

LAHORE FORT MASTER PLAN

Executive Summary

The Lahore Fort Master Plan provides a detailed and complete framework for determining and

implementing a coherent set of appropriate actions to preserve and manage this World

Heritage site. It aims to ensure that the cultural heritage significance of Lahore Fort is not

compromised, and that the values for which the monument was listed are not lost. It is intended

to serve primarily as a working document for the custodians of the site. However, it also

informs all levels of government and concerned departments of their roles and responsibilities,

as well as providing a format for increased community and voluntary involvement in caring

for the site.

Part 2 presents a brief background to the history of the citadel, and its inscription as a UNESCO

World Heritage site. It discusses the site's significance, emphasizing the responsibility of site

managers to preserve this within the existing legal and regulatory framework.

Part 3 describes the theoretical approach taken by the study team that designed the Master

Plan, clarifying the framework within which work was carried out. This includes the approach

towards intervention and the setting of conservation priorities.

Part 4 presents important core data regarding the significance, condition and conservation

needs of the site's structures. It explains the system for detailed documentation of the site's built

elements. Developed by the Heritage Foundation Pakistan (HFP), this comprehensive

recording system comprises: baseline survey folios; history of intervention dossiers for each

structure; catalogues containing information on the condition of all structures; documentation

catalogues, containing concise and comprehensive forms on each building. This data provides

the baseline information for all conservation and maintenance decisions at the site.

Part 5 describes the current context of Lahore Fort, highlighting the many issues it faces in

terms of site management, conservation, monitoring and maintenance, research, visitation and

the environment in and around the site. The purpose of this section is to clearly identify the

range of critical issues the Master Plan needs to address.

Part 6 of the Plan presents a series of integrated Action Plans, based on expert input. These

address the many issues raised in Part 3, in the context of the information presented in Part 5.

This programme for action aims to achieve the vision set out for the World Heritage site's

future, in both the short and longer term. It defines the overall approach taken, reformulates

issues into objectives and proposes actions for meeting these.

Following the presentation of recommended actions, a detailed Lahore Fort Objectives 2005-11

presents objectives with their level of priority, target date, key implementation agents and an

Page 12: Lf Master Plan

assessment of the types of resources needed for their implementation.

The subsequent Conservation Priority List sets out Priority 1 (emergency), Priority 2

(stabilization), Priority 3 (preventive conservation) and Priority 4 (conservation) needs for each

building and structure at the site, with indicative costs. The list will guide the allocation of any

funding, ensuring that endangered structures receive the emergency attention and

stabilization necessary to extend their life span.

Part 6 ends with recommendations for further specialist studies and projects to support the

Master Plan's effective implementation. The management and staff of Lahore Fort can

undertake some of these, as part of the on-going preservation programme; others will need to

be carried out by external government agencies.

Finally, Part 7 presents the mechanisms for implementing the Master Plan, including the term

over which the Plan will extend, the various agents responsible for its implementation and a

format for its systematic review at set intervals. Part 7 also includes a set of performance

indicators for reviewing implementation, and planning any corrections required.

Page 13: Lf Master Plan

CONTENTS

Part 1: Introduction to the Master Plan 1-8

Part 2: Introduction to the Lahore Fort 9-16

Part 3: Theoretical Framework 19-26

Part 4: Inventory of Heritage Resources 27-38

1.1 Need for and role of the Master Plan 3

1.2 Master Plan goal 3

1.3 Specific objectives of the Master Plan 3

1.4 Vision statement for Lahore Fort 4

1.5 Key stakeholders 4

1.6 Master Plan input and structure 5

2.1 Brief historical background 11

2.2 World Heritage Inscription 14

2.2.1 Background to Inscription 14

2.2.2 Statement of cultural significance 14

2.2.3 Implications for the Master Plan 15

2.3 Legal and regulatory framework 15

References 16

3.1 Guiding principles to achieve a long-term vision 19

3.1.1 Maintenance of the authenticity and values of the site 19

3.1.2 Safeguarding all original remnants is a conservation priority 20

3.1.3 Decision-making must be based on full documentation and research 20

3.1.4 Conservation and management programming must be sustainable 20

3.1.5 Tourism should support conservation needs -

not conservation to meet the needs of tourism 20

3.2 Standards for intervention 22

3.2.1 Levels of intervention 22

3.2.2 Selection of intervention level 24

3.3 Prioritization of conservation interventions 25

3.3.1 Conservation situations 25

3.3.2 The aim of prioritisation 26

References 26

4.1 Background to the methodology 29

4.2 Baseline survey folios 32

4.3 History of intervention dossiers 34

4.4 Condition survey catalogues 35

4.5 Documentation catalogues 36

Page 14: Lf Master Plan

4.6 Recording activity before, during, after 36

References 37

5.1 Site management issues 41

5.1.1 Custodianship and oversight 41

5.1.2 Enforcement of legal protection 42

5.1.3 Staffing 43

5.1.4 Training 44

5.1.5 Past Master Plans 44

5.1.6 Funding procedures 46

5.2 Conservation issues 48

5.2.1 Overall conservation approach 48

5.2.2 Prioritizing critical conservation issues 48

5.2.3 Procedures for implementing conservation work 51

5.2.4 Documentation 51

5.2.5 Conservation laboratory 53

5.2.6 Archaeological repository 53

5.2.7 Skilled artisans in traditional building crafts 54

5.3 Monitoring and maintenance issues 55

5.3.1 Routine monitoring and maintenance 55

5.3.2 Monitoring of conservation works 55

5.3.3 Maintenance of ruins and archaeological remains 56

5.3.4 Cleaning of monuments 56

5.3.5 Damage from watering of plants 56

5.4 Research and publication 57

5.4.1 Overall situation 57

5.4.2 Publication 58

5.4.3 Archaeological research 58

5.4.4 Library 58

5.4.5 Archival material 59

5.5 Site visitation 59

5.5.1 Threats from uncontrolled visitation 59

5.5.2 Emergency protection of fragile elements 60

5.5.3 Estimating visitor capacity 61

5.5.4 Interpretation and education 61

5.5.5 Museum displays 62

5.5.6 Young visitors 62

5.5.7 Community outreach 63

5.5.8 Restoration of historical access and links 64

Part 5: Current Context and Issues 39-74

Page 15: Lf Master Plan

5.5.9 Tourist facilities 64

5.5.10 Community craft production 64

5.5.11 Use of historical buildings and areas for events 65

5.6 Environmental and physical infrastructure issues 66

5.6.1 Overall situation 66

5.6.2 Environment in the areas surrounding the site 66

a.

b.

c.

5.6.3 Physical infrastructure of the site 68

5.7 Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT)

situational analysis of the Lahore Fort World Heritage site 72

References 72

6.1 Introduction 77

6.1.1 Short-term vision 77

6.1.2 Longer-term vision 78

6.2 Site management strategy 79

6.2.1 Overall strategy 83

6.2.2 Site Management Strategy (SMS) objectives 83

SMS Objective 1. Structures for custodianship and oversight 83

SMS Objective 2. Adequate financial resources augmented

by a diversified funding base 89

SMS Objective 3. A mechanism to take advantage of contributions in kind 91

SMS Objective 4. Mechanisms for acknowledgment of contributions 92

SMS Objective 5. An informed management team who understand

overall conservation objectives and priorities/ managing change 94

SMS Objective 6. Development of a Pakistan Conservation Institute

(PCI) as a viable training facility 94

SMS Objective 7. Core competency training for all levels of staff to

upgrade skills and build capacity within the department 96

SMS Objective 8. Implementation of standard operating procedures

(SOP) for frequently performed tasks to ensure consistency and

maintenance of standards 97

Vehicle movement and resulting pollution 66

Encroachment in the environs of the Lahore Fort 67

Integrated urban context 68

a. Sewerage and storm drainage systems 68

b. Water supply and distribution 69

c. Solid waste 70

d. Electrical systems and lighting 70

e. Security 71

Part 6: Programme for Action 75-168

Page 16: Lf Master Plan

SMS Objective 9. The systematic integration of analytical management

tools into the short and long-term planning by site custodians 98

SMS Objective 10. UNESCO assistance in creating a support network

of international collaboration and interaction 101

6.3 Conservation strategy 102

6.3.1 Overall Strategy 102

6.3.2 Conservation (COS) Objectives 104

COS Objective 1. All work is done in line with the Conservation

Action Priority List 104

COS Objective 2. Procedure for undertaking conservation work 106

COS Objective 3. Full and accessible documentation of the entire site 107

COS Objective 4. A well-equipped and committed conservation

laboratory facility 108

COS Objective 5. Centralized and systematic storage and inventory of

all artefacts and building elements retrieved or excavated from the site 108

COS Objective 6. Reinstallation of original historical building elements 109

COS Objective 7. Development of a conservation resource library 109

COS Objective 8. Training of qualified craftspeople and artisans to

C out conservation and maintenance work in traditional

materials and methods 109

COS Objective 9. A resource collection of building crafts 110

COS Objective 10. Support of in-house conservation 111

6.4 Monitoring and maintenance systems 111

6.4.1 Overall Strategy 111

6.4.2 Monitoring and maintenance (MM) objectives 112

MM Objective 1. Systematic monitoring of the historical fabric and

building condition at the Lahore Fort 112

MM Objective 2. A programme of regular site maintenance 114

MM Objective 3. A system of monitoring conservation work carried

out by the department or under their supervision 116

MM Objective 4. Protection of archaeological resources 116

MM Objective 5. Initiation of an expanded cleaning maintenance

programme for the site 118

MM Objective 6. Review of the planting programme 119

6.5 Research framework 119

6.5.1 Overall Strategy 119

6.5.2 Research Framework (REF) Objectives 120

REF Objective 1. Mechanisms to support a wide ranging research

programme at Lahore Fort 120

REF Objective 2. A Lahore Fort publication programme 121

arry

Page 17: Lf Master Plan

REF Objective 3. Programme of archaeological research & investigations 122

REF Objective 4. Upgrading of the library 123

REF Objective 5. Programme for collection, storage and inventory of

archival material 124

6.6 Visitation Policy 124

6.6.1 Overall Strategy 125

6.6.2 Visitation Policy (VIP) Objectives 126

VIP Objective 1. An Emergency Protection Plan to control visitor access

and close fragile areas 126

VIP Objective 2. An integrated interpretive policy based on sound

research 129

VIP Objective 3. Upgrading the Museum 130

VIP Objective 4. Drawing the Lahore community into all aspects of the

site's present and future safeguarding 131

VIP Objective 5. Restoring the historical relationship between Lahore Fort

and the walled city 132

VIP Objective 6. Relocating visitor services and amenities 134

VIP Objective 7. Events management 134

VIP Objective 8. Adaptive re-use of historical buildings for visitor use 135

6.7 Environmental and physical infrastructure plan 136

6.7.1 Overall strategy 136

6.7.2 Environmental Plan (EPI) Objectives: the site's environment 136

EPI Objective 1. Revitalizing the site's environs and reinstating a viable

buffer zone 136

EPI Objective 2. Entrance location and corresponding parking areas 138

EPI Objective 3. A phased approach to traffic issues and

pedestrianization in the site's environ 138

EPI Objective 4. Implementing Cultural Heritage Impact

Assessments (CHIA) 140

EPI Objective 5. Partnerships with the Lahore City Government and the

tourism industry to achieve preservation goals 140

6.7.3 Physical Infrastructure (EPI) Objectives 141

EPI Objective 6. Surface water drainage and damage to historic buildings 141

EPI Objective 7. Management of garbage and solid waste 142

EPI Objective 8. Improving toilet facilities 142

EPI Objective 9. Upgrading electrical provision at the site 142

EPI Objective 10. Enhancing the site for evening use 142

EPI Objective 11. Improved standards of security at the site 143

6.8 Lahore Fort Objectives - Action Plan 2004-12 143

6.8.1 Key to the Action Plan Table: 143

Page 18: Lf Master Plan

6.9 Conservation Priority List 154

6.10 Recommendations for further specialist studies 154

6.11 Sharing Progress with the Public 163

References 164

7.1 Implementing the Master Plan 167

7.1.1 Goals 167

7.1.2 Term of the Master Plan 167

7.1.3 Agents responsible for implementation 168

7.2 Reviewing the Master Plan 170

7.3 Performance indicators for reviewing implementation of the Master Plan 170

References 178

Figure 1.1 Schematic diagram of Master Plan structure and content. 7

Figure 2.1 Map showing the location of the Lahore Fort and Walled city. 12

Figure 4.1 Map of Lahore Fort with structure and building reference numbers 33

Figure 6.1 Model of cultural resource management 79

Figure 6.2 Diagram of the proposed management structure 88

Figure 6.3 Diagram of the proposed diversified funding approach 93

Figure 6.4 Diagram showing the formation process of Pakistan Conservation

Institute 95

Figure 6.5 Diagram showing the structure of the Pakistan Conservation Institute 96

Figure 6.6 Diagram illustrating proposed flow of conservation activities 103

Figure 6.7 Diagram illustrating conservation action priority 105

Figure 6.8 Diagram showing monitoring needs 113

Figure 6.9 Monitoring and maintenance teams' structure 114

Figure 6.10 Setting up and implementation of the monitoring and maintenance

programme 115

Figure 6.11 Map showing the areas of exposed archaeological remains and of

archaeological potential 117

Figure 6.12 Long term protection of below ground archaeological resources 123

Figure 6.13 Map Showing Visitors' facilities and routes 128

Figure 6.14 Map showing the Shahi Guzargah (royal route) to link the site with the

walled city 133

Figure 6.15 Map of Lahore Fort and its immediate environs, and existing traffic

management 137

Figure 6.16 Traffic rerouting and designated pedestrian areas 139

Figure 7.1 Partners responsible for implementing Action Plan components

Figure 7.2 Diagram illustrating the review process (MG = Management Group,

TC = Technical Committee, SC = Site Commission) 172

Part 7: Implementing the Master Plan 165-178

List of Figures

Page 19: Lf Master Plan

List of Tables

Table 3.1 Statement of the site's cultural values. 21

Table 3.2 Statement of the site's contemporary socio-economic values. 22

Table 4.1 Unique numbering system for Lahore Fort structures, showing their

original period and any subsequent interventions. 32

Table 4.2 Summary of documentation and recording system. 37

Table 5.1 Site management issues. 48

Table 5.2 List of conservation issues. 55

Table 5.3 Monitoring and maintenance issues. 57

Table 5.4 Research issues. 59

Table 5.5 Visitor numbers from November 1999 to October 2000. 61

Table 5.6 Site visitation issues. 65

Table 5.7 Environmental and physical infrastructure issues. 71

Table 5.8 SWOT situational analysis at Lahore Fort World Heritage site. 73

Table 6.1 Correlation between the issues raised in Part 3 of this report and the

Action Plan objectives. 82

Table 6.2 Format of Risk Assessment Model 100

Table 6.3. Research Framework: types of studies that would contribute to the

research base 121

Table 6.4 Issues related to the buffer zone and responsible agents 137

Table 6.5 Management Strategy Action Plan 144

Table 6.6 Conservation Strategy Action Plan 146

Table 6.7 Monitoring and maintenance systems Action Plan 148

Table 6.8 Research Framework Action Plan 149

Table 6.9 Visitation Policy Action Plan 150

Table 6.10 Environmental and Infrastructure Plan Action Plan 152

Table 6.11 Building Conservation Action Priority List & Related Costs 156

Table 6.12 Year-wise targets for conservation actions at Lahore Fort 158

Table 7.1 Proposed performance indicators 178

Page 20: Lf Master Plan

ACRONYMS

NAMES AND TERMS

CYOC C Y O C

HFP H F P

LFA L f a

PDC P D C

PIATR P I A T

R

PTDC P T D C

PCI P C I

ICOMOS I Co M S

ICCROM

ISESCO Is E S C

O

SOP S O P

SWOT S W O T

UNESCO U N E S C

O

Akbar, Jalal-ud-din Mohammad

(1542-1605)

Architrave/s

Auqaf Department

Aurangzeb Alamgir (1618-1707)

ommunity and outh utreach ell

eritage oundation akistan

ogical ramework nalysis

roject ocumentation entre

akistan nstitute for rchaeological raining and

esearch

akistan ourism evelopment orporation

akistan onservation nstitute

nternational uncil on onuments and ites

International Centre for the Study of the Preservation

of Cultural Property

lamic ducational, cientific and ultural

rganisation

tandard perating rocedures

trengths, eaknesses, pportunities and hreats

nited ations ducational, cientific and ultural

rganization

1605.

Moulded surround/s to an opening or recess.

Federal Government of Pakistan Department,

responsible for the upkeep and management of religious

buildings.

Last of the great Mughal emperors of India (1658-1707),

during whose reign the empire reached its widest extent.

Third Mughal emperor of India, who ruled from 1556-

Page 21: Lf Master Plan

Backet/s

Burra Charter

Capital/s

Chajjas

Dado

Darbar

Eave/s

Fresco

Fretwork

Haveli

Jehangir (1569-1627)

KaravanPakistan

Lahore Fort

Lintel/s

Projections from a wall for support.

Alternative title for the

. See References for full

bibliographic details.

Top part of a column, often decorated with carvings.

See Eave/s.

A strip of wood, metal or stone fixed to a lower part of a

wall.

An official reception held by a local prince, ruler or

British governor in colonial India.

The lower, projecting edges of a roof.

Picture painted on to a plastered wall when the plaster is

still wet.

Word, metal or stone decorated by carving to create a

pattern.

House, often a larger premises built around a central

courtyard.

Fourth Mughal emperor of India (1605-27), the eldest son

of Emperor Akbar.

A community and youth outreach programme,

promoting heritage for a culture of peace, national

integration and development. From 2001, it has

organised heritage 'street fests' and other culture and

heritage-related events - initially in Karachi, and, from

2004, throughout Pakistan.

The appellation dates from the British period. Its Urdu

appellation is Lahore Fort, which translates as royal fort,

or more appropriately, royal citadel.

A piece of stone, concrete or wood over a door or

window supporting the masonry above.

Charter for the Conservation of

Places of Cultural Significance

Page 22: Lf Master Plan

Mahmood of Ghazni (1170-1206)

Mughal

Pietra dura

Ranjit Singh (1780-1839)

Screen/s

Sepiolite

Shah Burj

Shah Jahan (1592-1666)

Shish Mahal

Spalling

Stratigraphy

Shahab-ul-Din, King of Gazni.

The Mughal Empire ruled the Indian subcontinent for

more than 300 years from 1526 to 1858, except for a brief

period under the Sur Sultans (1540-1555). The British

abolished it in 1858.

Technique of engraving designs in marble and then

inlaying these with thin sections of precisely cut semi-

precious stone in a variety of colours to create pictures or

patterns.

Indian warrior and founder of the Sikh Kingdom of the

Punjab.A partition that partially divides a space.

Hydrated magnesium silicate.

A portion of the Lahore Fort commissioned by Shah

Jehan, it contains the Shish Mahal and number of other

important buildings.

Fifth Mughal emperor of India (1628-1658), the third son

of Emperor Jahangir.

A palace building, forming part of the Shah Burj. It

contains a famous mirrored ceiling.

The splintering or breaking down of stone or concrete.

The study of strata, or layers specifically, the

superposition of soil and geological strata containing

archaeological materials in order to determine the

relative ages of layers.

Page 23: Lf Master Plan

PART 1

Introduction to the Master Plan

1

Page 24: Lf Master Plan

2

Page 25: Lf Master Plan

PART 1

INTRODUCTION TO THE MASTER PLAN

1.1 NEED FOR AND ROLE OF THE MASTER PLAN

1.2 MASTER PLAN GOAL

1.3 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES OF THE MASTER PLAN

Lahore Fort is the foremost Mughal monument in Pakistan. It reflects the full span of the

Mughal period, comprising architectural and garden elements representing the pinnacle

of Mughal aesthetics, design and artistry. The importance and significance of the

monument have been acknowledged by its inclusion, in 1981, on the UNESCO list of

World Heritage sites. However, it was inscribed without a master plan forming part of

the nomination. Today, negative impacts from environmental degradation, visitor usage

and ill-advised interventions are increasing. Without an appropriate response, they will

continue to increase. A comprehensive master plan is urgently required urgently to

ensure that the cultural heritage significance of Lahore Fort is not compromised, and that

the values for which the monument was listed are not lost.

The overall goal of the Lahore Fort Master Plan is to provide a detailed and holistic

framework for determining and implementing a coherent set of appropriate actions to

preserve and manage this World Heritage site. All efforts must focus on preserving and

enhancing the many values that contribute to the site's universal cultural significance.

The Master Plan meets the following specific objectives:

a. to assess the effectiveness of existing management systems, and propose changes or

new methods which would build on these;

b. to look at ways of generating funds for conserving and developing the site;

c. to achieve baseline documentation and condition assessment of the built and

landscape elements of the entire site;

d. to develop a strategic approach to conservation to ensure that the appropriate level

and type of intervention is applied to specific conservation issues faced at the site;

e. to prioritize all conservation actions, set standards for determining future priorities

and ensure that conservation actions are carried out on the basis of need and urgency;

f. to design a system of regular monitoring to ensure that baseline conditions are

retained, if not improved;

g. to design a practicable system of continuing maintenance for the grounds and all

buildings;

3

Page 26: Lf Master Plan

h. to set focused, multi-disciplinary research goals involving staff, national and

international scholars and teams;

i. to present a plan that finds the optimal level for visitation, ensuring that the site

benefits rather than suffers and that the visitor experience is enhanced;

j. to recommend ways to improve community out-reach and involvement in the site;

k. to upgrade the physical environment and infrastructure of the site and its environs;

l. to assist site managers in implementing proposals that are not be hindered by changes

in staff or circumstances.

Although it consists of many structures, it is important to treat the site as a single entity

comprising historic structures interlinked by quadrangles and open spaces. Conserving

and safeguarding this entity must be central to all discussion relating to it. Methodologies

adopted need to aim at presenting layers of history and infusing a new dynamismin

developing a sense of historical continuity from the past to the present.

The second Experts Meeting on the Preservation and Conservation of Lahore Fort

organized by UNESCO in August 2003, agreed on the following vision statement.

To transmit to the coming generations an experience of a traditional culture in

all its multiple dimensions, because it is these traditions that encapsulate a

world view and wisdom which has sustained our humanity and our planet for

millennia past.

The following key stakeholders were involved in the design, delivery and receipt of the

Lahore Fort Master Plan.

The Norwegian Government has generously funded the project through the

Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD).

The Government of the Punjab.

The Master Plan addresses the following target audiences.

1.4 VISION STATEMENT FOR LAHORE FORT

Statement of Vision

1.5 KEY STAKEHOLDERS

a. Funders

b. Delivery Partners

c. Target Audience

,

4

Page 27: Lf Master Plan

i. Custodians of Lahore Fort

The Plan is specifically designed and formatted as a working document that can

be updated as required. For this purpose, there is a range of supplementary

information in Annexures at the end of the main plan.

ii. Concerned provincial and local government departments specifically those

involved with strategic and physical planning within the site and its environs.

The Lahore Fort is an integral part of urban Lahore. Many of the issues concerning

its preservation and presentation need addressing at a city and provincial level.

The Master Plan attempts to identify the roles and responsibilities of all

stakeholders, and proposes systems for liaison and cooperation.

iii. The community and voluntary organizations, especially schools, youth and

women.

As a World Heritage site, the citadel is part of the shared heritage of Lahoris,

Pakistanis and the world as a whole. The Master Plan views access by the

community as an essential component of successful preservation and

management. It aims to involve people in as many ways as possible. It also

provides a format for involving voluntary organizations, in collaboration with

the site's custodians, to ensure greater outreach to the community and young

people.

A diverse range of stakeholders contributed to the Plan's preparation, through a

series of meetings, on-site interviews, discussions and continuing

communication. This ensured that all parties were able to adequately present

their needs and interests as the study evolved. Further input from all parties was

also sought on the Draft Report, in order to finalise the Plan.

The Master Plan is based on relevant documentation and international best practice,

supported by detailed studies carried out by national experts on:

environmental and physical planning;

management and monitoring systems;

visitor management;

building condition assessment;

conservation interventions.

The studies produced were based on extensive research, fieldwork, interviews and

professional experience. Each expert was commissioned to:

1.6 MASTER PLAN INPUT AND STRUCTURE

5

Page 28: Lf Master Plan

make an assessment of existing conditions and a situation analysis;

make recommendations for prioritised action to address identified issues;

develop integrated plans for implementing recommendations;

identify any additional specialist studies needed to enable implementation of the

Master Plan.

The Master Plan study began in August 2003, at the second Experts Meeting on the

Preservation and Conservation of Lahore Fort held at the site. A draft scope for the Master

Plan was presented to the assembled experts for discussion, comment and initial

approval. After ongoing consultation with the Lahore Fort Technical Committee and

integration of expert input, a Draft Master Plan report was submitted in late March 2004.

After modification, the final Master Plan Report was submitted in June 2004.

The Master Plan comprises seven parts:

Part 1 is an introduction to the Master Plan, including the need for the plan, its objective

and aims, vision statement, stakeholder discussions and Plan inputs and structure;

Part 2 introduces the Lahore Fort comprising a brief historical background, an outline of

its World Heritage Inscription and the legal framework in which the site is embedded;

Part 3 summarizes the current situation at Lahore Fort in terms of management,

conservation, monitoring and maintenance, research, visitation, environment and

physical infrastructure, followed by a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats

(SWOT) situational analysis;

Part 4 gives a brief statement concerning the theoretical framework in which the Master

Plan has been prepared, the overall approach to conservation interventions and the need

for the setting of priorities;

Part 5 provides essential baseline documentation, in the form of detailed catalogues of all

buildings, structures and other heritage resources comprising the Lahore Fort

Part 6 presents a multi-disciplinary programme of integrated action designed to address

the conservation and management issues facing the Lahore Fort ;

Part 7 proposes ways in which the action programme can be implemented and scheduled.

,

;

6

Page 29: Lf Master Plan

Figure 1.1 Schematic diagram of Master Plan structure and content

-

Goal and Objectives Theoretical FrameworkWorldHeritagesignificance

Legal &regulatoryframework

Assessment ofexisting conditionsat the site:

Objectives - ActionPlan

2006 2012

ImplementationMechanisms

ReviewMechanisms

SiteManagement

Conservation

Monitoring &Maintenance

Research Visitation

Environment &Infrastructure

Inventory ofHeritageResources

7

Page 30: Lf Master Plan

8

Page 31: Lf Master Plan

PART 2

Introduction to Lahore Fort

9

Page 32: Lf Master Plan

10

Page 33: Lf Master Plan

PART 2

INTRODUCTION TO LAHORE FORT

2.1 BRIEF HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

The Lahore Fort World Heritage site is located near the River Ravi, in the northwestern

corner of Lahore's walled city (see Fig. 2.1). Archaeological evidence from the site of the

citadel goes back to pre-Muslim times, although the configuration and layout of the

present citadel is generally agreed to have been initiated by Akbar. After having built

Agra and Fatehpur Sikri as impressive capitals, Lahore became an Akbari showcase for

the best architectural ensembles of the period.

From its planning and its extensive use as a royal residence, it is clear that the site was

envisaged as a fortified palace rather than a defensive fort. Three Mughal emperors,

Akbar, Jahangir and Shah Jahan, concentrated on building exquisite palace structures

after the first fortification walls had been constructed to secure the perimeter of the

citadel. In truth, after the threat posed by Mirza Hakim (Akbar's step-brother), when the

mud brick wall was replaced with stronger brick fortifications, there was no occasion for

the citadel to defend itself from invading armies and it continued to flourish as a palace

when the emperor was in residence at Lahore.

The value of the site as a showcase of Mughal architecture stems from the fact it served as

the garden palace for all the great Mughal emperors and contains exemplary architecture

from each reign. The present configuration of the Lahore Fort can justifiably be attributed

to the master of fortification planning, Jalal-ud-Din Mohammad Akbar. Although built

on the remains of citadels of earlier dynasties, Akbar planned and fortified the present

site when he established his capital in Lahore for the 14 years between 1584-98. Akbar

used the earlier mound, which archaeological evidence dates to pre-Muslim occupations,

as the central core for semi-public and service areas. The earlier perimeter wall of sun-

dried brick was replaced with burnt brick fortification walls, turrets and towers to secure

the citadel's western, southern and eastern periphery. The River Ravi, which then flowed

along the northern periphery, provided a secure and scenic front for the imperial section

of the intensely private palace frontage, raised on subterranean chambers.

It is not certain that Akbar intended the citadel to be a garden palace. However, he did

initiate the process by planning his (female quarters) palace in the form of a

paradise garden. His successors continued to use the (garden quadrangle)

concept, as they developed the citadel palaces along the northern periphery. Thus, the

citadel can be best understood as a conglomerate of linked Each of these is

endowed with its own special introverted spatial characteristics, bordered by

(suites), (towers) or (cells). The linked imperial courts are defined as Ahata-e-

1

harem sera

chahar-bagh

chahar-baghs.

iwans

burj dalans

11

Page 34: Lf Master Plan

Fig. 2.1: Map showing the location of Lahore Fort, Lahore

12

SHAHDARA

G.T

.R

OA

DR

IVER

RAVI

BAN

DR

OAD

BAND ROAD

RAV

I BRID

GE

SABZI MAN

DI R

OAD

ROAD

ROAD

SABZI MANDI ROAD

IQBAL PARKG.T. ROAD

BADAMI BAGH

BUS TANND

RAILWAY

STATION

DATA

DARBAR

CENTRALMODALSCHOOL

LO

WE

R

MA

LL

CHOBURJI

Page 35: Lf Master Plan

Jahangir, Ahata-e-Shah Jahan, Ahata-e-Moti Masjid, Ahata-e-Khilwat Khana and Shah

Burj, complete with quadrangle. The highly public Maidan-e-Diwan-e-Aam, although

not a planned , was nevertheless created as an introverted space bordered on

three sides by a large number of , of which the Jahangir period Makatib Khana

formed the northwestern edge.

Akbari period sculptured structural elements found in Jahangir's quadrangle are unique

to the Lahore citadel, the work of the most experienced artisans brought in after the

completion of Fatehpur Sikri. Similarly, the spectacular frescos of the Kala Burj (imperial

residential tower) ceiling demonstrate the skill of Jahangir's court painters in

incorporating influences of European artistic imagery. The pristine classical Shah Jahani

order, with its refined pietra dura in marble seen in the Shah Burj, reflects the aesthetic

preference of the early Shah Jahan period. The picture wall, which extends for three

quarters of a mile along the western and northern fortification walls, is one of the longest

(tile mosaic) murals in the world. Portraying the pursuits and courts of the

Mughals, it represents the high point of both Jahangir's and Shah Jahan's reigns.

After the construction of the Badshahi Mosque by Aurangzeb Alamgir, the later Mughals

did not often frequent Lahore. With the rise of the Sikhs, Ranjit Singh, the one-eyed Sikh

ruler, made extensive use of the citadel. Although he never sat on the throne of the

Mughals, he set up his darbar in the Shah Burj and made the Shish Mahal his favourite

abode. Several rooms were constructed on the roof of the Shish Mahal, as well as the

famed Athdara in the Shah Burj forecourt. Structures were also constructed on other

Mughal buildings - examples include the Mai Jindan Haveli and the palace of Kharak

Singh. During the Sikh Period, Ranjit Singh dismantled and re-used Mughal elements in

buildings constructed by him. The fort suffered enormously during the inter-Sikh wars,

when cannons directed at the walls of the fort irretrievably damaged Shah Jahan's Diwan-

e-Aam.

The British period was also destructive, due to the establishment of a British cantonment

and inappropriate use of elegant palace buildings. In 1905, after the visit of Viceroy

Curzon, action was taken to dismantle cantonment structures after British army units

began to vacate them. A concerted effort to restore Mughal imperial structures dates from

that period.

Although several makeshift British structures were removed, some survived until after

1947. More recently, controversial new constructions have been added to Jahangir's

quadrangle in an attempt to recreate the original quadrangle configuration.

From its configuration, it is evident that the citadel, whilst it helped in the defence of the

city and its residents, was itself dependent on the city for supplies and protection. This

particular relationship was severed during the British period by the opening of a postern

chahar-bagh

dalans

kashi-kari2

13

Page 36: Lf Master Plan

gate, closing up of the historical Akbari gateway and later construction of the ceremonial

steps on the southern periphery. There is an obvious need to re-establish the link between

the Mughal citadel and Lahore's walled city, as is suggested in the UNESCO report on

.

Lahore Fort was jointly inscribed on the World Heritage List with the Shalamar

Gardens, in 1981. Both sites were inscribed on the basis of Criteria (i), (ii) and (iii),

specifically because 'They represent a masterpiece of human creative genius,

exhibit an important interchange of human values over a span of time or within a

cultural area of the world, or developments in architecture or technology

monumental arts, town planning or landscape design, and because they bear a

unique or at least exceptional testimony to a cultural tradition or to a civilization

which is living or has disappeared.'

The 23rd Session of the World Heritage Committee, meeting in December 1999,

noted that there had been serious damage to the mirrored ceiling of the Shish

Mahal, aggravated by water seepage during the 1999 monsoon season. The

ICCROM recommended the installation of temporary roofing.

As a result, the 23rd session of the World Heritage Committee placed Lahore Fort

on the list of World Heritage sites in danger. No specific reference was made to the

conservation crises at the Lahore Fort. The site was still on the list when this

document was prepared.

The term 'cultural significance' means the 'Aesthetic, historic, scientific, social or

spiritual value for past, present or future generations embodied in the place itself,

its setting, use, associations, meanings, records, related places and related

objects.'

The following statement defines the cultural significance of the Lahore Fort.

Cultural Tourism in Lahore and Peshawar 3

4

5

2.2 WORLD HERITAGE INSCRIPTION

2.2.1 Background to Inscription

2.2.2 Statement of cultural significance

Lahore Fort is the foremost Mughal monument of Pakistan, imbued with layers

of historical and spiritual meaning for locals and visitors alike. Inside its walls

are preserved numerous examples of the apogee of Mughal arts, building crafts

and architectural skills in a single complex, enriched by temporal depth and

continuity from prehistory to the present. The changing and evolving styles

throughout the period and into the Sikh and British eras are richly preserved.

14

Page 37: Lf Master Plan

Individual elements are spatially arranged according to a set of archetypal

Mughal design principles: a series of chahar-bagh quadrangles presenting a

balanced formal composition of space, water, vegetation and architecture,

texture and colour, light and shade, designed to divide space into public and

private and to provide physical and symbolic transitions between them. In

addition to providing an oasis of green and calm in the crush of urban Lahore, the

site has great didactic potential to teach all ages about the wealth of the past and

its relevance and value to the present and future.

2.2.3 Implications for the Master Plan

6

World Heritage inscription does not provide specific statutory protection or

financial aid from UNESCO. It is an internationally recognized designation,

which encourages national governments and site managers to ensure long-term

protection for sites of global significance. The states that the aim of

conservation is to retain the cultural significance of a place (Article 2.1) and that

places of cultural significance should be safeguarded and not put at risk or left in a

vulnerable state (Article 2.3). It is this cultural significance which is the basis for

World Heritage inscription, and it is the responsibility of states parties to

'Maintain the authenticity and, in the case of World Heritage sites, the cultural

values for which the site was inscribed.'

Master Plan design and implementation has to clearly focus on maintaining and

protecting individual physical elements and the place itself its setting, use,

associations and meanings in order to meet this obligation. Specifically, this

means safeguarding the period fabric of buildings and structures, the details of

style and decorative schemes, the balance of periods represented by new

structures and alterations to existing ones, spatial relationships between

architectural elements and open spaces and the symbolic meaning of spaces and

movement through them. All conservation treatments should guarantee

protection of the site's authenticity, prolong the duration of its integrity and

prepare it for interpretation. A balanced judgment, based on a hierarchy of

resource values and a systematic process of evaluation, is therefore essential for

establishing an appropriate conservation methodology and treatment strategy.

Stipulations contained in the Government of Pakistan's Federal Antiquities Act 1975

(Act-VII of 1976) govern the Lahore Fort and Shalimar Gardens World Heritage sites. The

following stipulations are relevant to these sites.

Burra Charter

7

8

2.3 LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

15

Page 38: Lf Master Plan

Clause 3, stating that the Federal Government will constitute an Advisory

Committee.

In accordance with the Act, the Federal Government, by notification in the Official

Gazette, may declare any antiquity to be a protected antiquity for the purposes of the

Act (Clause 10 [1]). There is also a requirement to fix a notification in a 'Conspicuous

place of or near the antiquity.'

The Act is clear, regarding the uses of a protected monument or site. Clause 18 states:

'A protected immovable antiquity shall not be used for any purpose inconsistent with

its character or for a purpose other than that directly related to its administration and

preservation.'

Clause 19 clearly stipulates the fine and punishment in cases where the 'antiquity' is

damaged or destroyed: 'No person shall, except for carrying out the purposes of this

Act, destroy, break, damage, alter, injure, deface or mutilate or scribble, write or

engage in any inscription or sign on, any antiquity or take manure from any protected

antiquity.' Infringement is punishable 'With rigorous imprisonment for a term which

may extend to three years, or with fine or with both.' (Clause19 [2])

Clause 22 requires that 'No development plan or scheme or new construction on, or

within a distance of two hundred feet of a protected immovable antiquity shall be

undertaken or executed except with the approval of the Director General.'

Clause 23 (i) prohibits the placing of 'Any neon signs or other kinds of advertisement,

including bill posting, commercial signs, poles or pylons, electricity or telephone

cables and television aerials, on or near any protected immovable antiquity.'

References:

1. Lari, Yasmeen, Heritage Foundation Pakistan, 2003, p. 1.12-1.21

2. ibid., p. 1.12-1.21

3. UNESCO, , Islamabad, 2003, p. 86

4. , UNESCO World

Heritage Centre, 2005, paragraph 77, p. 19-20.

ICOMOS Australia, The Burra Charter),

1999, Article 1.2, p.1.

Fielden, Bernard and Jukka, Jokilehto,

ICCROM, Rome, 1993, p. 59

, op cit., Article 2, p. 1.

8. Federal Antiquities Act 1975 (Act-VII of 1976), paragraph 1.

Lahore Heritage Guide,

Cultural Tourism in Lahore and Peshawar

Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention

Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Significance (

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites,

Burra Charter

5.

6.

7.

16

Page 39: Lf Master Plan

PART 3

Theoretical Framework

17

Page 40: Lf Master Plan

18

Page 41: Lf Master Plan

PART 3

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

3.1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES TO ACHIEVE A LONG-TERM VISION

The following principles below reflect the theoretical approach taken by the study team

when designing the Master Plan. These clarify the framework within which work has

been carried out.

The study team adopted the principle, stated in Article 2.2 of the ,

that the single most important aim of conservation is to retain the cultural

significance or authenticity of a place; the 'Aesthetic, historic, scientific, social or

spiritual value for past, present or future generations.' The study team also

acknowledges the

regarding prerequisites for conservation and maintenance of authenticity. They

state that:

'The authenticity of monuments, buildings and structures is integrally linked to

the temporal narrative embedded in their fabric. Understanding the

chronological development of a monument and the multiple and complex

structural, spatial and decorative layers which result is essential to the

conservation of authenticity.'

It is essential that the values that give the Lahore Fort meaning and significance

are clearly stated, and that all preservation efforts focus on retaining these. Tables

3.1 and 3.2 present a preliminary statement of those values that make the site

significant, and, as such, are elements that must be safeguarded.

Given that values can change in nature and perception, they need to be reviewed

periodically; listing further values and broadening the focus to protection of all

significant values by complementary management.

The study has taken the position that 'The aim of safeguarding of World Heritage

sites is to maintain their authenticity and the values for which they have been

listed. Therefore, any treatment should be based on the strategy for minimum

intervention.' All interventions should be reversible and should maintain the

authenticity of the resource.

3.1.1 Maintenance of the authenticity and values of the site

3.1.2 Safeguarding all original remnants is a conservation priority

Burra Charter

Draft Hoi An Protocols for Best Conservation Practice in Asia,

1

2

The original elements to needing to be safeguarded include those that have

become valuable with the passage of time and changes in historical

circumstances. These accumulated changes have themselves become part of the

19

Page 42: Lf Master Plan

historical character and material substance of the site: 'This material substance

represents the intrinsic values of the cultural resource; it is the bearer of historical

testimonies and of associated cultural values, both past and present '

John Marshall recognised the importance of retaining original fabric and its

inherent values. His , written in 1923, has served as the main

reference for generations of custodians of the Shalimar Bagh:

'Although there are many ancient buildings whose state of repair suggests at first

sight a renewal, it should never be forgotten that their

and that our first duty is not to renew them but to

preserve them. Broken or half decayed original work is of infinitely more value

than the smartest and most perfect new work.'

The Master Plan has taken the following statements from the

to reflect the pivotal importance of research and detailed documentation

to the conservation process:

'Decisions regarding the type and extent of intervention carried out as part of a

conservation plan should only be taken after extensive research, expert

discussion and weighing of conservation options. Intervention should be the

minimum required to ensure the preservation of the heritage values and

authenticity of a monument or building.'

All programmes and action plans addressing the protection and maintenance of

Lahore Fort must be sustainable. This means that decisions are made on the basis

of up-to-date, reliable and usable information and that all actions are at best

reversible and the minimum required: 'Changing as much as necessary but as

little as possible.' Actions must also be fully documented. Programming should

be designed in such a way that it can continue along clearly defined paths,

following well designed and focused methodologies regardless of administrative

or staff changes at the site.

The consensus of the Master Plan project team is that preserving cultural heritage

and supporting creativity and living culture has to be given precedence. All

efforts to promote cultural tourism need to include adequate controls to prevent

the intrusive and destructive impact of tourism found at many historic sites.

Proposals and recommendations need to ensure that tourist activities do not

.

Conservation Manual

historical value is gone when

their authenticity is destroyed,

Draft Hoi An

Protocols

3

4

5

6

3.1.3 Decision-making must be based on full documentation and research

3.1.4 Conservation and management programming must be sustainable

3.1.5 Tourism should support conservation needs - not conservation to meet the needs

of tourism

20

Page 43: Lf Master Plan

undermine the authenticity and integrity of the historic structures. Intensification

of tourism can only be justified if the major portion of all earnings is directed

towards the maintenance of cultural assets and the communities on which

tourism is based. Within these provisos, there is ample scope for cultural tourism

to develop and benefit local communities.

CULTURAL VALUES

Table 3.1: Statement of the Cultural Values of the World Heritage Site

Identity value

Relative artistic or technical value

Rarity value

Physical and Visual value

— The emotional ties of

society to the site (aesthetic and spiritual

value, continuity, memorial, legendary,

political, patriotic and nationalistic). It is

based on recognition and the selection of

influences of a resource.

— The

importance of the design and the

significance of its technical, structural and

functional concept and workmanship. It is

based on research and influences the

strategy for treatment of a resource.

— Defines the resource's

rarity, representativeness or uniqueness in

relation to other examples of the type. It is

based on statistics and influences the level

of protection accorded to a resource.

— The value

inherent in the scale, location, physical

form and its impact on the viewer. It is

based on recognition and influences overall

treatment, particularly of site setting.

Lahore Fort is an icon for national identity,

acknowledged as such by all levels of society

even if not fully understood. It is symbolic of

both historical and legendary versions of the

past which are shared by all Pakistanis; a

tangible representation of Muslim rule in the

subcontinent. It provides a link with the pre-

colonial past reviving memories and sentiments

related to a free subcontinent.

Lahore Fort preserves examples of all

architectural styles of the Mughal empire at

their best. It constitutes a standing reference

collection of architectural planning, materials,

methods and decorative traditions. The site

retains the essential plan and design of the

Mughal palace with assemblages representing

all spheres of court life.

Lahore Fort is one of two Mughal citadels which

can exhibit the work of all the great Mughals

Akbar, Jahangir, Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb, in

the nearby Badshahi Mosque. It represents a

unique ensemble of Akbar's stone structural

struts, Jahangir's frescoes with European

imagery, the purity of Shah Jahan's classical

order and the superb JahangirShah Jahan tile

mosic mural depicting the grandeur of the

Mughal Darbar.

Lahore Fort presents an image of grace and

grandeur above the Lahore skyline; a physical

form widely recognized. Physically and

historically linked to the Walled City it forms a

significant historical assemblage.

21

Page 44: Lf Master Plan

CONTEMPORARY SOCIO-ECONOMIC VALUES

3.2 STANDARDS FOR INTERVENTION

Table 3.2

3.2.1 Levels of intervention

Statement of the site's contemporary socio-economic values

The reason for selecting one level of intervention over others depends upon a

number of factors, including the nature and heritage value of the building or site,

the goals of the conservation project, the scale of the artefact being conserved and

the financial and human resources available.

Most heritage conservation projects necessarily involve a combination of

approaches, rather than isolated interventions. Thus, in a project seeking to return

a building to an earlier appearance (restoration), it may be necessary to reinforce

Economic value

Educational value

Recreational and Social value

— The value generated by

the heritage resource or by its conservation

in terms of potential revenue from tourism,

commerce, use and amenities. It is based

on inherent qualities and their marketing

and influences community priorities and

future conservation funding.

— The extent to which a

resource can inform the present about its

past in the context of cultural tourism. It is

based on assessment of physical integrity

and historical research and influences re-

use and interpretative decisions.

— The

potential for social interaction and

establishing community identity. It is

based on assessment and influences

interpretation and presentation of the site

and visitor interaction.

Lahore Fort is a potentially rich economic

resource with potential revenue generated

through visitation and an appropriate

hospitality infrastructure in the vicinity;

economic benefits could be felt in the Walled

City community resulting from integrated

development. It has the potential for income

generation for the community through craft-

sales based on designs of the Lahore Fort.

Lahore Fort provides a highly visible and

dramatic tool for informing the present about

the many historical and cultural themes of

Pakistan's past; it contains a wide array of

didactic forms, both built and intangible, to

enrich the visitor experience.

Lahore Fort stands at the physical centre of

Lahore and the symbolic centre of the nation; as

such, it is the metaphorical property of a wide

community. Involvement of the community in

safeguarding and caring for the site creates a

sense of pride and commitment in all elements of

society and strengthens social cohesion

22

Page 45: Lf Master Plan

historic structural elements (consolidation) upgrade entrances, exits, and services

(rehabilitation), and, perhaps, dismantle a section in order to replace intrusive

elements and support historic portions (reassembly).

To discuss various levels of architectural conservation intervention at the site,

standardized terminology and definitions relevant to Pakistan have been adapted

from the and other

international guidelines. Interventions are divided into those showing full,

moderate and limited respect for the historic fabric of a building. A discussion of

these various levels, their conservation implications and the circumstances under

which they might be used, is presented in Annexure 5. They need to be fully

understood by all those involved in conservation planning and regularly referred

to during the decision-making process.

is an act that provides protection by controlling the environment,

including internal and external causes of deterioration. Timely preventive

measures can prolong the life of a historic asset at an economical cost.

is the act or process of applying measures necessary to sustain the

existing form, integrity and materials of a historic property. Work, including

preliminary measures to protect and stabilize the property, generally focuses

upon the ongoing maintenance and repair of historic materials and features,

rather than extensive replacement and new construction. The aim of preservation

is to keep the historic property in its existing state and take measures to prevent

further decay.

is the act of physical addition or application of supportive material

into the fabric of historic property, to ensure its continued durability or structural

integrity.

is the act or process of reviving the concept of an object; to either an

original state, or an appearance it had at a particular period or time. It requires

returning it to a known earlier state by removing features from other periods in its

history or re-assembling existing components without the introduction of new

material. Restoration can also involve replacing missing or decayed parts,

ensuring that this integrates harmoniously with the whole whilst also remaining

distinguishable from the original on close inspection. Missing decorative

elements in restoration work may be justified, but not by falsifying the evidence.

is the act or process of providing for compatible use of a property

through repair, alterations and additions, whilst preserving those portions or

features that convey its historical or cultural values. Any changes made should be

of a substantially reversible nature and cause minimal impact.

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites7

Prevention

Preservation

Consolidation

Restoration

Rehabilitation

23

Page 46: Lf Master Plan

Reproduction

Reconstruction

is the act or process of copying an existing artefact, often to replace

some missing or decayed parts. Generally used for decorative elements, it is not

recommended for architectural elements.

is the act or process of using new materials on historical fabric. A

necessity in the event of a disaster caused by fire, earthquake or war, it must be

based on accurate documentation and evidence, not conjectures. It is not a

recommended option in the context of Pakistan's heritage.

The critical stage in the conservation process is deciding on which approach or

approaches to take. This decision determines the extent to which the integrity of

the historic fabric is retained. The preferred level of intervention is always that

which shows full respect for historical fabric, maintaining and supporting

existing fabric with a minimum of modern addition. Actions within the second

level of intervention those which exhibit only moderate respect for original

material should only be employed in exceptional situations and with detailed

justification. Actions showing little respect for historical fabric should be avoided

whatever the circumstances.

The reason for selecting one level of intervention over others depends upon a

number of factors, including the nature and heritage value of the building or site,

the goals of the conservation project, the scale of the resource being conserved and

the financial and human resources available.

By necessity, most heritage conservation projects involve a combination of

approaches rather than isolated interventions. In a project that seeks to return a

building to an earlier appearance, it may be necessary to reinforce structural

elements (consolidation), upgrade entrances, exits, and services (rehabilitation)

and possibly dismantle a section in order to replace intrusive elements and

support historic portions (restoration).

Efforts must be made to ensure:

that an appropriate assessment of conservation level(s) is carried out in

advance of any conservation decision-making;

the assessment is based on authentic information and full documentation;

the assessment can be supported by following international standards and

guidelines for conservation, listed in Annexure 8, and that all subsequent

decisions include references to these standards;

that decisions are only made after full discussion between the custodians of

the site, the project management team and the technical committee;

all decisions are publicized for public comment.

3.2.2 Selection of intervention level

24

Page 47: Lf Master Plan

3.3 Prioritization of conservation interventions

3.3.1 Conservation situations

Critical and in need of emergency and/or stabilizing action

Serious and in need of Preventive Conservation

Ongoing and in need of Conservation Action

Conservation actions need to be prioritized at a complex site like Lahore Fort, to ensure

efficient and effective investment of time and money. Work needs to be carried out based

on a needs assessment of the severity of the conservation situation. As stated in the

The inevitable contradictions of

the planning process should be resolved first by examining the implications of all viable

alternatives, and then by deciding which is least harmful to the significance of the

heritage site.'

Severity is the relative relationship between inherent significance of the site in relation to

its current physical condition and the nature and extent of threats. The data needed to

carry out this measurement includes statements of significance for individual built

elements, regular monitoring reports and expert assessment.

Conservation situations are categorized as follows.

Element(s) of high cultural significance are in poor condition. This is

progressively worsening and there is imminent danger that qualities and

features forming the basis of significance will be lost. Immediate action is

required to substantially improve the situation, in both environmental and

conservation terms.

Elements of high or medium cultural significance are in poor condition. This

is progressively worsening and there is growing danger of damage to or loss

of those qualities and features that form the basis of significance. The problem

is serious and may have existed for a long time; however, short-term action

begun within the next six to 12 months and completed promptly will

significantly improve the situation.

Elements of high or medium cultural significance are in poor condition.

Although of a long-term nature, with elements remaining relatively stable,

there is a danger that this may eventually result in damage to or loss of those

qualities/features that form the basis of significance. Longer-term action, in

the form of studies, need to be started as soon as possible. Overall, the whole

process will take a long time before any improvement can be seen.

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites, '

8

a.

b.

c.

25

Page 48: Lf Master Plan

3.3.2 The aim of prioritisation

References

The aim of prioritization is three-fold:

a. to identify significant elements in each structure and in buildings as a whole,

which are in critical condition and require emergency action;

b. to identify serious situations, where progressive deterioration requires

preventive conservation action to be taken in the short-term;

c. to identify ongoing situations in need of study and longer-term

conservation planning.

Initial steps have been undertaken as part of the catalogues presented in Part 5 of

the Master Plan; individual elements and parts of buildings and buildings having

been identified as being in critical condition and requiring immediate action.

These sources will serve as the basis for planning and conservation at the site.

The Conservation Action Priority List in Part 6, section 6.9, lists those built

elements at the site that require priority conservation action. However, the

condition of historical resources does not remain static and it will be necessary to

update and amend this documentation at regular intervals through regular

monitoring.

Decisions as to what conservation action is required will need to be based on the

condition surveys included in the catalogue, along with research into past

interventions, maintenance (if any), and assessments generated through ongoing

monitoring of the resource. All decisions should be made in the context of

international best practice, set out in relevant charters and guidelines presented

in Annexure 10. They will also need to take into consideration the relative

significance of the resource and the nature and extent of the threats it faces.

1. UNESCO, Bangkok, 2004, Section 5.2

2. Fielden, Bernard and Jukka, Jokilehto,

ICCROM, Rome, 1993, p. 75

3. ibid., p. 14

4. Marshall, John,

1923, 1990 Edition, New Delhi: Asian Educational

Services, p. 9-10.

5. , op cit., Section 4.1.6.

6. , op cit., Article 3.1, p. 1.

7. See Master Plan References.

8. , op cit., p. 23

Draft Hoi An Protocols for Best Conservation Practice in Asia,

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites,

Conservation Manual: A Handbook for the Use of Archaeological Officers and Others

Entrusted with the Care of Ancient Monuments,

Draft Hoi An Protocols for Best Conservation Practice in Asia

The Burra Charter

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites

26

Page 49: Lf Master Plan

PART 4

Inventory of Heritage Resources

27

Page 50: Lf Master Plan

28

Page 51: Lf Master Plan

PART 4

INVENTORY OF HERITAGE RESOURCES

4.1 BACKGROUND TO THE METHODOLOGY

Comprehensive recording and documentation are fundamental to any programme

aiming to preserve the universal value and authenticity of a site like the Lahore Fort. The

Government of Punjab Lahore Fort Project entrusted the Heritage Foundation Pakistan

(HFP) with organizing, devising and directing a comprehensive heritage recording

system for the site. The HPF is also responsible for training associated personnel from the

Federal Department of Archaeology and Museums.

The recording methodology has been tailored to the requirements of the historic citadel.

As a critical activity within the conservation process, this needs to be comprehensive and

provide the necessary information for site's effective management.

Although records have been created over many years, they were not maintained in a

systematic or comprehensive way. As this is a project objective, it was essential to develop

a comprehensive recording system to provide a full record of the historic structures along

with baseline information. This led to the development of formats for preparing a

comprehensive conditions survey catalogue, as well as documentation catalogues for

gathering detailed information to assist in conservation, maintenance, management and

monitoring activities.

The recording systems developed by HFP comprises:

baseline survey folios (Annexure 6);

dossiers of histories of intervention (Annexure 7);

a condition survey catalogue (Annexure 8);

documentation catalogues (Annexure 9).

Graphic and photographic records provide the information necessary for planning

conservation and maintenance programmes. They are important for designing

interventions, and provide a basis for further studies. For this reason, establishing a

Project Documentation Centre (PDC) with properly trained personnel received the

highest priority. Set up in May 2003, the PDC is equipped with computers, photocopying

and printing machines and digital cameras. Extra computers, acquired in early 2004,

further improved the Centre's performance. Meanwhile, personnel originating from the

Survey Office of the Federal Department of Archaeology and Museums have been

trained to perform their roles effectively and efficiently.

29

Page 52: Lf Master Plan

30

For ease of reference to historic assets, each structure is numbered according to a spatial

configuration that acknowledges the monument is a garden palace comprising linked

(or introverted quadrangle spaces). Figure 4.1 contains a site plan, showing

various structures and their numbering systems. The numbering system presented in

Table 4.1 is included as a reference in all documents, annexes and reports. For ease of

reference, Table 4.1 shows the numbering system for standing structures only.

The comprehensive system incorporates the following elements:

quadrangles and maidan;

buildings;

structures in ruins;

foundations;

basements.

1.1 Maidan-e-Diwan-e-Aam Mughal British

1.2 Diwan-e-Aam Mughal British

1.3 Daulay Khana-e-Khass-o-Aam Mughal Sikh / British

1.4 Kharrak Singh Haveli Mughal Sikh / British

1.5 Makatib Khana Mughal

2.1 Moti Masjid Quad Mugal British

2.2 Moti Masjid Mughal

2.3 Mai Jindan Haveli Mughal Sikh

2.4 Western Dalans Mughal Reconstruction

3.1 Jahangir's Quad Mughal Sikh / British

3.2 Janoobi Iwans Mughal

3.3 Mashriqui Iwans Mughal

3.4 Mashriqui Suite Mughal

3.5 Mashriqui Butj Mughal

3.6 Bangla Pavillion East Mughal

3.7 Jahangir's Khwabgah Mughal British

3.8 Maghribi West Burj Mughal

3.9 Maghribi West Suite Mughal British

3.10 Maghribi West Iwans Mughal Reconstruction

chahar- baghs

No. Name of Structure Original Period Interventions

1. Diwan-e-Aam Quadrangle

2. Moti Masjid Quadrangle

3. Jahangir's Quadrangle

Page 53: Lf Master Plan

31

3.11 Zenana Hammam Mughal

4.1 Shah Jahan's Quad Mughal Sikh / British

4.2 Diwan-e-Khass Mughal

4.3 Kwabgah-e-ShahJahani Mughal Sikh / British

4.4 Hammam-e-Badhshahi Mughal

4.5 Arx Gah Mughal

5.1 Paien Bagh Quad Mughal Sikh / British

5.2 Imperial Zenana Mosque Mughal

5.3 Kala Burj Mughal

5.4 Khilwat Khana Mughal

5.5 Lal Burj Mughal

6.1 Hathi Reception Court Mughal

6.2 Sikh Temple Sikh

6.3 South Dalans Mughal

6.4 North Dalans Mughal

6.5 Gor Darwaza Mughal

7.1 Shah Burj Forecourt Mughal Sikh

7.2 Athdara Sikh

7.3 Shah Burj Quadrangle Mughal Sikh

7.4 Shsh Lahal North Face Mughal Sikh

7.5 East Sehdara Mughal Sikh Sikh

7.6 South Dalans Mughal Sikh

7.7 West Sehdara Pavillion South Mughal Sikh

7.8 Naulaka Pavillion Mughal Sikh

7.9 West Sehdara Pavillion North Mughal Sikh

8.1 Shah Burj Darwaza Mughal

8.2 Hathi Paon / Ghulam Gardish Mughal

9.1 West Pictured Wall Mughal

9.2 North Pictured Wall Mughal

4. Shah Jahan's Quadrangle

5. Paien Bagh Quadrangle

6. Hathi Reception Court

7. Shah Burj

8. Shah Burj Darwaza

9. Pictured Wall

Page 54: Lf Master Plan

32

10. Miscellaneous

11. Fortification Wall

4.2 BASELINE SURVEY FOLIOS

10.1 British Garages British —

10.2 British Bridge British

10.3 Barood Khana British

10.4 Imperial Kitchens Mughal

10.5 British Shed British

10.6 Akbari Darwaza Mughal

10.7 British Steps British

10.8 Alamgiri Darwaza Mughal

10.9 Postern Gate British

10.10 Curator Residencs British

11.1 East Fortification Wall Mughal

11.2 South Fortification Wall Mughal / British

11.3 West Fortification Wall Mughal /Sikh

11.4 North fortification Wall Sikh

Records developed through this process are designed to assist conservation professionals

and specialists carrying out research, and in management, analysis and maintenance

activities. Using accurate graphic, photographic and written data, they present the

configuration and condition of various historic assets.

Information about standing structures has been developed to varying levels of detail,

with records accordingly classified as detailed, medium and preliminary. For example,

the intricacy of decorative features at the Shah Burj, and the need for its immediate

conservation, meant recording it in detail. Shortages of time and personnel prevented

other standing structures being documented to the same extent. However, many are

documented to a medium level for example, Jahangir's quadrangle, for which plans,

elevations, section and preliminary schedules have been prepared. Other structures are

recorded at a preliminary level only, using plan footprints, as is the case with the Alamgiri

gateway. Recording work is, however, ongoing and those structures presently recorded

to medium or preliminary level will eventually be the subject of a detailed examination.

In phase two, the team will record the picture wall and basements to a detailed level. .

Table 4.1: Unique numbering system for Lahore Fort structures, showing their original period and any

subsequent interventions

Page 55: Lf Master Plan

Fig. 4.1 Map of Lahore Fort with building and structure reference numbers

33

Page 56: Lf Master Plan

The HFP format requires each primary, secondary and decorative element to have a

dedicated number, marked on the relevant measured drawing. Schedules, which are

prepared for each structure, provide information regarding every element: its number,

location, description, dimensions and condition, along with numbered photographs and

period of intervention details, if known.

Thousands of pages of schedules have been supplemented with detailed measured

drawings (plans, sections and elevations), along with numbers for each element.

Documentation folios have also been compiled; for each room, in the case of the Shah

Burj, or each structure, subject to the complexity and extent of the decorative features. As

a first step, documentation folios are being finalized for standing monuments.

The detailed and comprehensive framework developed for the Lahore Fort meets the

following objectives.

a. A regimen of accurate and precise documentation has been instilled, essential for

proper conservation work.

b. Effective recording techniques and documentation system provide a

comprehensive framework for recording a historic structure as complex and ornate

as the Lahore Fort.

c. The PDC has guidelines for forming teams to work at other heritage sites.

d. The team is able to properly share records and documentation. Through

computerization and digitalisation, they can widely disseminate soft copies of all

records.

Baseline survey folios are in Annexure. 6.

Before undertaking any conservation work, it is important to develop an understanding

of past interventions. The British Archaeological Survey began recording interventions,

after taking over from the British military authorities. Work carried out after

Independence was also recorded as it was done. Most of the intervention record reports

are in the Library of the Federal Department of Archaeology at Lahore Fort.

A research cell, created within the Project Office to collect all relevant material relating to

all structures at site, is now organising this in line with the Heritage Foundation's format.

Several volumes of

have been prepared. They carry excerpts from all reports and printed documents that

have been located. For ease of reference, each dossier contains an index for the excerpts

found in it. The front page of each report, document or publication precedes the excerpts

to allow accurate notation when documents are referenced.

4.3 HISTORY OF INTERVENTION DOSSIERS

Dossiers of Historical Accounts and Records of Interventions to Lahore Fort

34

Page 57: Lf Master Plan

Although most of the present excerpts are from pre and post-Independence

Archaeological Survey reports, in future the intention is to add excerpts from other

sources. In addition to being a source for conservation work, scholars and historians will

also be able to use these.

The dossier format ensures that all reference material relating to alterations made in each

structure is easily accessible, facilitating the planning of conservation work. It also allows

dossiers to expand to include any additional material, including future interventions.

These dossiers, along with baseline survey folios, are indispensable tools for conservation

managers.

The histories of intervention dossiers are in Annexure 7.

Preliminary information concerning the condition of each element is included in the

baseline survey folio. This is useful in assessing conservation needs of an element at a

detailed level. To develop comprehensive conservation strategies, broader information

about primary, secondary and decorative elements is required. Since the Master Plan

aims to provide sufficient information to support the work of the Government of the

Punjab Department of Archaeology, a room-by-room condition survey was developed,

along with an assessment of areas of critical concern.

The survey systematically examines each structure and its subdivisions, recording the

condition of material in each subdivision. The survey covers the following elements:

roofs, ceilings, walls, columns, flooring, decorative features and miscellaneous items.

In addition to information recorded under each heading, a condition summary based on

field notes is also attached. This information is based on visual examination, not a

detailed study. However, this will have been carefully compiled and, by assessing

condition for the first time, it will provide comparative baseline information about the

condition of standing structures. The basements and picture wall have not yet been

examined in the case of the former, because they mostly inaccessible and in the latter case

because of difficulties posed by its great length and height. In future, an expanded and

updated catalogue will cover the above structures and other areas not covered in the

present study.

Although information is based solely on visual assessments, it is a valuable source; it will

assist conservation managers in developing proposals for preventative maintenance, or

commissioning in-depth studies for conservation work.

The Condition Survey Catalogues are in Annexure 8.

4.4 CONDITION SURVEY CATALOGUES

35

Page 58: Lf Master Plan

4.5 DOCUMENTATION CATALOGUES

4.6 RECORDING ACTIVITY BEFORE, DURING, AFTER

The documentation catalogues have been specifically developed to help identify

priorities for conservation work, and in maintenance and monitoring. The HFP format

consists of a comprehensive two-page form for each structure. They provide easily

accessible summary information, comprising:

a. graphic and photographic information, consisting of location on the site plan, plan

footprint and a general view;

b. written information consisting of name, location, classification of category, status,

accessibility and present use, ownership, representation in existing surveys,

description of condition, its period and a statement of significance;

c. bibliographical references, dossier references, condition survey and baseline

survey folio references, descriptions, brief histories and dates of known

interventions;

d. checkpoints for monitoring and maintenance schedules, remedial measures

required and approximate costs.

These comprehensive catalogues will be useful tools when developing strategies or

undertaking conservation work. Information about remedial measures emergency,

stabilization, preventative maintenance and conservation requirements has been

developed through visual examination and is of a preliminary nature. However, they do

not provide information about the condition of various structures on a comparative scale,

as every structure will have been visually evaluated in the condition survey catalogues.

The documentation catalogues will also assist the Department to prioritize work when

funding is available. Other work for example, stabilization, preventative maintenance

and conservation can be scheduled according to the severity of the problem.

The documentation catalogues are in Annexure 9.

By developing an inventory of historic sources, the Department is now well equipped to

undertake all conservation work in a systematic and logical fashion. For the first time a

holistic picture of existing conditions exists, providing conservation managers with the

information to ensure that funding is used in the most effective manner to preserve this

World Heritage site. Table 4.2 summarizes the recording system and shows ways in

which each part can be used in planning conservation work at the Lahore Fort.

The Master Plan envisages that all future interventions will be carried out in accordance

with agreed and defined principles and guidelines. The re-hanging of the Shish Mahal

ceiling is an example of how best-practice conservation work should be done, with

36

Page 59: Lf Master Plan

37

excellent and systematic workmanship following procedures which were properly

recorded.

It is important that Article 16 of the Venice Charter is followed in letter and spirit, in

requiring that there should be 'Precise documentation in the form of analytical and

critical reports, illustrated with drawings and photographs.'

With the baseline graphic and photographic information now available, it is critical that,

as conservation work proceeds, it is not just interventions that are recorded but the

discussion and planning process too. Reports need to be prepared for all works and made

part of the history of intervention dossiers. This will ensure that future custodians fully

understand work currently being done as part of this Master Plan.

Baseline Survey To assist conservation managersFolios in planning maintenance and of

conservation and preparingdetailed works proposals

schedules

Dossiers of

conservation structure

Condition Survey To assist conservation managers

Documentation To provide detailed 2-page

structure at a glance; to be usedin particular for settingconservation and maintenancepriorities and maintenance and recommen-

dation for remedial action neededwith indicative costs.

1

Document Aim of the Document Summary of Contents

Detailed recording of each elementevery building/structure; graphic

records including plans, elevations,sections, photos and preliminary

To serve as a reference for Copies of all reports, publicationsHistories of conservation managers in and documents describing pastInterventions planning maintenance and interventions to each building/

Details of materials and conditionCatalogue in developing proposals for of all primary, secondary and

preventive maintenance or decorative elements of each part ofconservation work every building/structure

Plan and photo; name, location,Catalogue summaries of each building/ classification, status, use, condition

and significance; cross references toother documents; history and date ifknown; checkpoints for monitoring

Table 4.2 Summary of documentation and recording system

References

1. (The 'Venice Charter'),

adopted at the Second International Congress of Restoration, Venice 25-31 May 1964. Padova, Italy,

ICOMOS.

International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites,

Page 60: Lf Master Plan

38

Page 61: Lf Master Plan

PART 5

Current Context and Issues

39

Page 62: Lf Master Plan

40

Page 63: Lf Master Plan

PART 5

CURRENT CONTEXT AND ISSUES

5.1 SITE MANAGEMENT ISSUES

5.1.1 Custodianship and oversight

In mid-2004, the Government of the Punjab Department of Archaeology took over

site management and administration; ownership, however, remains with the

Federal Ministry of Culture.

The Provincial and Lahore City Governments were not previously involved in the

administration of heritage sites, as this was a Federal Government responsibility.

The resulting lack of coordination meant that Provincial and City Governments

did not feel compelled to provide any assistance in protecting the monument.

This was an unsatisfactory situation; not least, because the City is responsible for

the site's immediate environment, including traffic movement, rubbish removal

and preventing illegal building encroachments.

The official tourist authorities, the Pakistan Tourism Development Corporation

(PTDC) and Tourism Development Corporation of Punjab, play no role in

managing or directly promoting tourism at the site. They provide no input on

display and use of the site for visitor enjoyment and education. Although the site

forms part of the tour itineraries promoted by both organizations, they do not

conduct special tours or provide special promotional material. Local tour

operators are also not involved in any campaigns to promote the site, nor do they

provide guides or arrange any special activities or events.

The lack of a coordinated strategic approach to cultural heritage management has

encouraged ad hoc decision-making, resource allocation and conservation

practice. Managers of Lahore Fort often have to make decisions with few

guidelines, procedures and systems. The competence of cultural heritage

managers is part of the problem, as their qualifications and practical experience

may not properly equip them for their roles. In addition, they do not have the

resources or support to implement standard conservation methodologies and

link these to a strategic plan.

There is no regular inspection of the systems and work of the site management by

any external agency. What needs to be done, how it is to be done and whether it is

of an acceptable international standard, are decisions taken entirely by the

41

Page 64: Lf Master Plan

Department itself. Although the World Heritage Committee provides clear

guidelines for maintaining and managing World Heritage sites, they have done

little to ensure that they followed.

In December 2002, Pakistan submitted its six-year to the World

Heritage Committee on legislative and administrative provisions and other

actions taken for the application of the World Heritage Convention. This

included the state of conservation of its World Heritage properties. In addition,

there have been several visits by international consultants to the heritage site.

However, these visits have been short and their mandate did not include

checking conservation procedures. They were also conducted in the company of

department officials, who are unlikely to point out actions that might not conform

to World Heritage guidelines. By not looking closely into procedures,

international consultants' visits provide reassurance and tacit confirmation of the

status quo. Unfortunately, these visits may also have been used to justify and

sanctify unacceptable work.

As discussed in section 2.3, the 1975 Federal Antiquities Act provides various

forms of legal protection to support the preservation and best-practice

management of the fort. However, in almost every case there has been a failure to

take advantage of this and the site suffers as a result.

Although the Act stipulates that the Federal Government will constitute an

Advisory Committee (Clause 3), this committee does not appear to exist.

Clause 18 of the Act is clear about the use that the protected monument or site

may be put to. However, the spirit and letter of this clause are not enforced

when permission is given for events to be held at the site.

In spite of the stringent fines and punishments laid out in Clause 19 for wilful

damage to a monument, the Department has not been able to use these to

protect structures from graffiti and other forms of vandalism. There are

insufficient guards patrolling the site and the Department does not have the

magistrate's powers necessary for their enforcement.

Clause 22 requires that 'no development plan or scheme or new construction

on, or within a distance of two hundred feet of a protected immovable

antiquity shall be undertaken or executed except with the approval of the

Director General.'

However, since such a clause is not incorporated in Building Bye-laws or

Urban Planning Bye-laws of the Acts governing city development, Clause 22

Periodic Report1

2

5.1.2 Enforcement of legal protection

42

Page 65: Lf Master Plan

has been contravened in almost all cases, unless the department had the

foresight to acquire the land in the buffer zone. There is no local and provincial

government legislation related to development that protects the 200-foot

buffer zone around the site from encroachment, garbage, road works and the

resulting damage to the site's integrity.

Clause 23 (i) prohibiting direct attachment of any item on or near a protected

monument is regularly and systematically contravened. Unless this clause

also becomes part of local government legislation, the citadel will continue to

suffer from electricity poles and cables, handbills posting and other intrusions

on the fortification walls. Despite the threat of imprisonment and fines, the

Department's inability to act is obvious from a tour of the citadel's walls.

One hundred and ten personnel are employed at Lahore Fort, comprising:

two junior archaeologists (Curator and Assistant Curator);

Analysis of existing staff composition shows that watch and ward staff are the

highest priority, with garden staff being the second priority and conservation

staff the last priority. As a result, there is a serious shortage of specialist expertise

in the wide range of skills needed to carry out the conservation and maintenance

of a World Heritage site.

5.1.3 Staffing

a junior engineer (Conservation Assistant);

a junior gardener (Garden Assistant);

two supervisors and two foremen;

a clerk;

a khalasi;

an electrician;

a sikligar;

an engraver;

a kashigar (tile worker) and a mistry (bricklayer);

six tube well drivers and helpers;

four museum attendants;

30 watch and ward staff;

35 gardeners and bhishtis;

13 labourers and seven sweepers.

43

Page 66: Lf Master Plan

Because the Federal Department of Archaeology has not engaged experts for

specialist advice, staff have to rely on sources within the Department.

Consequently, they are unable to get timely advice necessary for proper

execution of works. Those managing the site often find themselves in the difficult

position of having to choose between what they know to be the correct

conservation decision and what is demanded of them politically.

The conservation and maintenance teams are visibly under-equipped and have

work with outdated and inefficient tools. This includes equipment needed for

maintenance, conservation, laboratory facilities and documentation. The existing

PIATR materials laboratory lacks equipment, and much of what it does have is

unused because team members do not know how to operate it.

5.1.4 Training

5.1.5 Past Master Plans

The Pakistan Institute for Archaeological Training and Research was established

to train professional conservation staff, to serve as a materials laboratory and to

teach specific building crafts needed for conservation of Pakistan's World

Heritage monuments. It has facilities at Lahore Fort and some equipment.

However, it has become inactive and urgently needs revamping and

strengthening with more staff, improved buildings, equipment, research

facilities and a curriculum focus.

The UNESCO report on recommended

that the institute be reorganised as the Pakistan Conservation Institute. Although

various institutions in Lahore teach architecture, including the National College

of Arts and University of Engineering and Technology, none offers a degree

course in conservation theory and principles or traditional building methods and

building crafts. The only conservation course available in Pakistan is run by the

NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi.

Since much protected heritage consists of standing monuments, it is essential to

provide conservation training to architects and engineers. The lack of sufficient

technical expertise within the Department is one of the key causes of

inappropriate conservation work. By working with architectural and engineering

schools to institute conservation courses, the Department will become stronger

by being able to induct technical personnel familiar with conservation issues and

able to oversee the work needed to safeguard heritage assets.

The first Lahore Fort Master Plan was prepared in 1973 and included

conservation and restoration of all the site's important areas. Work continued

Cultural Tourism in Lahore and Peshawar3

4

44

Page 67: Lf Master Plan

until 1985, exceeding original cost estimates but completing only 25 per cent of

the proposed work. No detailed report is available. A Technical Committee was

convened to assess the situation in 1985; it proposed concentrating restoration

efforts on several individual buildings. Development schemes were

subsequently prepared for work in specific areas of the site. These are listed

below, with comments on their status in parenthesis.

a. (Revised in 1991,

planned completion date 1997; report missing. Extent of works carried out

uncertain; work suspended.).

b. (Began in 1981-82,

most work appears to have been completed; report missing.)

c. (Approved in 1992,

work begun before revision in 1994 rescheduled completion for 1997. Revised

again in 2002, with a completion date of 2006. No report; not clear what work

has been carried out; work continuing.)

d.

(Approved in 1992-93, revised 1997. Work scheduled for completion in 2005-

6. No report available.)

e.

(Prepared 1997-98; to be finished 1999-2000. No report. Technical Committee

review and censure in 1997. Work scheduled for completion in 2004-5 is

suspended.)

f.

(Part of a bigger programme under control of a special committee. No

record.)

A specialist report, the

, highlights a number of fundamental problems, characteristic of these

past conservation plans (the full report is in Annex 1). Its findings are

summarized here.

The conservation of monuments or archaeological sites requires special expertise

to cope with unexpected findings, their interpretation and treatment. Too often, a

contractor appointed through the government tender system does not have these

skills and uses inappropriate tools and methods on historic fabric. The existing

contract system has resulted in a great deal of sub-standard conservation work,

and irreversible loss of integrity to historic monuments.

Scheme for the Preservation and Restoration of Shish Mahal.

Scheme for Restoration and Preservation of Eastern Dalans.

Scheme for the Preservation and Restoration of Western Dalans.

Scheme for the Preservation and Restoration of Basement Chambers of Shish Mahal.

Scheme for Preservation and Restoration of Diwan-e-Aam and Diwan-e-Khass.

Scheme for Preservation and restoration and Face Lifting of Southern Fortification

Wall.

History of Conservation Approaches and Interventions at

Lahore Fort

45

Page 68: Lf Master Plan

Previous schemes have taken the form of PC-1 documents. These are designed to

serve as applications for government funds for specific works, giving a brief

background of proposed works and quotations for workforce and materials. The

PC-1 normally provides only general information on civil works items. Schemes

prepared on a PC-1 pro forma do not require detailed justification for proposed

works; consequently, the information given on the pro forma fails to provide

details about location and measurements of an item of work and is no substitute

for a full and detailed report.

The lack of detailed work specifications in the PC-1 pro forma leaves the use of

funds and decisions about treatment of historic fabric mostly to the discretion of

the site supervisor. Much of the unfortunate and unnecessary intervention in

evidence is probably due to these discretionary powers allowed under the

present system.

Almost all of the schemes were revised, sometimes repeatedly; in most cases,

because funds were not provided in accordance with the phasing envisaged in the

scheme. Consequently, none have been completed on time. The planning of new

schemes whilst previous ones are still in progress has also created problems for

the department's staff, as the increased workload is not matched with additional

staff. The result is that normal maintenance and repairs are abandoned, with

buildings not included the new scheme suffering further neglect.

In the past, the Federal Ministry of Culture annually allocated funding for Lahore

Fort. However, the sum allocated was always grossly inadequate. The

preservation budget, in addition to staff salaries, falls into two categories: funds

for 'Annual Repairs and Maintenance' and funds for 'Special Repairs'. Recently,

the Government of Pakistan has also provided funds from its development

budget; funding also augmented by the international community in a few

instances. The site generates around 3.8 million Pakistani Rupees from ticket sales

each year, in addition to an unspecified though substantial amount generated

from fees charged for special events and commercial use by film-makers. Yet, it

has received an annual average of less than 650,000 Pakistani Rupees for regular

repairs, maintenance and development. Even after including the money received

for 'special repairs' over the last ten years, the site has given more to the

government than it has received.

A number of bureaucratic obstacles had to be overcome before Federal Ministry

funds could be spent on the site. Information about the National Budget,

5.1.6 Funding procedures

46

Page 69: Lf Master Plan

announced in June, takes several months to reach the Department and its regional

offices. Amounts are then allocated to various monuments. Gaining access to this

money is also a lengthy and bureaucratic process. The Director has the power to

spend up to only 25,000 Pakistani Rupees. For sums beyond this, detailed

conservation plans and budget estimates in the form of 'Conservation Notes' are

prepared for the approval of the Director General/Ministry a process that can

only be completed by the end of November or early December, when half the

fiscal year has already passed. A budget estimate then passes between offices

until all objections and queries are settled, a process that can take several more

months. Consequently, the earliest that approval can be received is often the

middle or end of April. This leaves only two months before the end of the

financial year, during which the Department has to implement of all the work.

Inevitably, there is pressure to finish work quickly. Hasty execution and

dependence on 'replacement and reconstruction' for quick results rather than

painstaking preventive conservation, can be directly attributed to this system for

the release of funding.

Additional funding comes from charges for events held at the citadel and from

rent paid by the canteen and other concessions. Government of Norway funding

of the Project for the Conservation and Preservation of Lahore Fort has made a

substantial contribution towards conservation, documentation and future

management of the site. In future, the Government of the Punjab will need to

provide further funding.

There is no mechanism presently in place to attract contributions in kind, in the

form of materials or expertise. This is a large, untapped resource base. There is

also no formal procedure for acknowledging contributions made by public,

corporate or individual sponsors. High profile recognition of contributions

would help encourage more donors to give towards the maintenance and

management of the site.

Issue 1: The need for a structured, multi stakeholder management system to guide

conservation and management

Issue 2: The need for a broader based and more efficient funding approach

Issue 3: The unexploited potential for contributions in kind

Issue 4: The lack of an acknowledgment mechanism to encourage donors

Issue 5: The need for an informed management team to implement the Master Plan

Issue 6: The lack of focused training in conservation and management

47

Page 70: Lf Master Plan

Issue 7: The need to identify basic job skills for all levels of staff

Issue 8: The need for a clear definition of job scope for all levels of staff

Issue 9: The need to integrate a variety of management tools into the system

Issue 10: Isolation of the site custodians and lack of international and regional support

Conservation efforts at Lahore Fort have been characterized by lack of

comprehensive planning based on accurate needs assessments and international

standards. The custodians of the monuments have followed an outdated

conservation manual, written in 1923 by Sir John Marshall. Decisions to conserve

have often been made arbitrarily, without reference to need or assessment of

priorities.

As a result, the recent approach to 'conservation' has tended towards:

reactive conservation without assessment of need and a clear statement of

priorities;

partial or full reconstruction of structures on the basis of insufficient research

and without clear identification of 'new' versus 'original'.

Archaeological excavations at Lahore Fort show that it is the last of thirteen

cultural layers, with the earliest dating from 2,200 years ago . This sequence of

occupations has created a mound of soil and mud brick that has not fully settled

and does not drain properly. Consequently, there are continuous problems at the

site with settlement of the structure's foundations and underground chambers.

There is no proper dispersal of water; dampness therefore rises through the brick

Table 5.1 Site management issues

5.2 CONSERVATION ISSUES

5.2.1 Overall conservation approach

5.2.2 Prioritizing critical conservation issues

refurbishment without adequate historical research, done by unskilled

workers;

dealing with surface appearances, without addressing serious structural

issues;

carrying out interventions without proper study or preparation beforehand;

replacing faded or slightly damaged original elements with new copies in

similar materials;

5

48

Page 71: Lf Master Plan

walls, causing fracturing and disintegration. Leakage from old terracotta water

pipe systems throughout the Fort further aggravates this problem.

The Twenty-third Session of the World Heritage Committee, meeting in 1999,

acknowledged that the Shish Mahal, a decorated palace built in 163132 by

Emperor Shah Jahan, was of critical concern. Water leakage during the 1999

monsoon season had exacerbated the damage to the exquisite mirrored ceiling.

At the recommendation of Sir Bernard Fielden, the ICCROM consultant,

temporary roofing was installed. Investigation of the roof also revealed that

termite damage to the beams, although arrested by previous treatments, had left

them weakened. The wooden strip and gutch framework, to which the ceiling

mirror work is attached, was also sagging dangerously due to vibration and

deterioration. Subsequent major works consolidated and strengthened the

roofing system, conserving the decorative features of the ceiling.

Other critical conservation issues at Lahore Fort are as follows.

i.

Rising damp in walls in underground chambers due to lack of damp

proofing and lack of surface water drainage from adjacent areas.

ii.

Seepage of water due to insufficient storm water drainage and

defective waterproofing.

Termite attacks on wooden members.

iii

Lack of protection from excessive traffic and inadequate storm water

drainage.

iv.

Spalling, structural cracks, deterioration of stone surface, marble

'cancer' in the Moti Masjid and Diwan-e-Khass, due to excessive

pollution.

i.

Cracks, predominantly in top and bottom architraves and spalling of

edges.

ii.

Structural cracks, damaged portions due to displacement and

disintegration due to exposed condition.

a.

b.

Primary elements

Secondary elements

Walls

Roofs

Floors

Columns, bases, capitals, brackets, lintels fabricated from stone

Stone and marble architraves

Stone and marble fretwork screens

49

Page 72: Lf Master Plan

iii.

Displacement, damage and opening of joints.

iv.

Disintegration of bricks and loss of mortar.

i.

In fragile condition, due to inadequate protection from natural

elements and visitors' graffiti - examples include the fresco in the

lower part of the picture wall and the upper portions of the

(triple doorway) in Jahangir's quadrangle.

ii.

Spalling of corners, discolouration and staining from inserted metal

bolts.

iii.

In fragile condition, due to inadequate protection from natural

elements and, particularly on the northern side, excessive pollution.

iv.

Disintegration due to marble 'cancer', loss of top veneer, spalling and

discolouration due to excessive pollution.

v.

Loss due to dampness, which destroys the bond between the base and

mirror; disintegration of the in lower parts, due to wilful

damage by visitors.

vi.

Loss caused by wilful damage - examples include the Shish Mahal

Aiwan column bases during Sikh and British periods and damage in

Naulakha Pavilion caused by visitors.

Another important issue is the treatment of open areas within quadrangles and

other open spaces. The present pattern of grass lawns and trees, most of which are

not original, date from the British period. Detailed historical analysis into the past

treatment of these areas is required, to determine whether they conform to the

Mughal pattern of quads and open spaces. In the interim, it is important to

reassess their viability as water seepage from lawns and shrub and tree roots are

visibly damaging adjacent structures, foundations and archaeological remains.

It is important to address all of these conservation issues in order of priority, not in

a random fashion and that priorities are determined through complete and

thorough review of the conservation status of all of the site's built elements.

Stone or marble overhanging eaves (or chajjas)

Brick overhanging eaves ( chajjas)

Frescos

seh dara

Marble or stone dado (izara)

Kashi kari (tile mosaic)

Marble facing

Mirrorwork and manabbat kari

manabbat kari

Pietra dura

c. Decorative features

50

Page 73: Lf Master Plan

5.2.3 Procedures for implementing conservation work

5.2.4 Documentation

The Department is undertaking conservation work at the site without sufficiently

standardized procedures. There is a need to clearly identify the steps required, in

order to ensure that subsequent work is justifiable, carefully planned and

implemented.

At present, there is little reference to the many international guidelines, manuals

and case studies available. Work in other parts of the sub-continent, Southeast

Asia and elsewhere would provide useful models and new ideas and approaches.

The PDC needs to have a well-stocked library of texts, articles, reports and access

to on-line references.

Full documentation of a World heritage site is a fundamental requirement. This

includes maps, plans, architectural details, photographs, film and text.

Custodians also record, in detail, every intervention into the site's fabric and

form, documenting it a series of 'before and after' presentations.

A UNESCO report on highlighted the

need for such baseline documentation at Lahore Fort - a need addressed, in part,

by the ongoing project by creating a Project Documentation Centre at the site in

May 2003, under the guidance of the HFP. Although the site had a drawing office

producing surveys and drawings for work done at the site, there was no system

for systematically documenting these. This resulted in haphazard and unrelated

activity, driven by immediate needs or requirements determined by officials. The

old drawing office had only manual equipment; a few sets of plan presses for

storing drawings, basic survey equipment and some rudimentary furniture.

To assess the importance of existing documentation for future conservation work,

a small Project Documentation Centre was established. It is equipped with three

computers, including a laptop, a photocopying machine and a flatbed scanner

with related hardware and software. It also has printing equipment for drawings

and documents, along with a digital camera. The PIATR have provided a

dedicated room for the PDC. Systematic work began, using drawings and

schedules specially developed for the Lahore Fort by the HFP and their unique

numbering system for each element, ranging from primary and secondary, to

decorative features. Given the complexity of the site structures, particularly of the

Shish Mahal, the HFP documentation procedure ensures that the specially

devised schedules cover all aspects of each item. This includes preliminary

condition and dates of intervention, along with photographic recording.

Cultural Tourism in Lahore and Peshawar6

51

Page 74: Lf Master Plan

Before it could begin operating, the PDC team required training; only two of the

team, for example, knew how to use a computer (a requirement for all team

members). From May 2003, the team started carrying out important work that has

formed the basis of subsequent conservation activity. In 2004, additional

computers and photographic equipment further boosted PDC facilities.

The record consists of the following items.

i. A British period map dating from the 1880s, based on an earlier Sikh

period map. It does not appear to be based on a physical survey of the site

and carries no levels.

ii. A Department of Archaeology map prepared during 1970s, which took

into consideration the site conditions. However, it is not based on a

physical survey of the whole site and carries no levels.

There are several basic plans, sections and elevations of various structures,

prepared during the British period and dating from the early twentieth

century. The drawings also show additions to Mughal structures, built to

serve the British cantonment.

i. Archival photographs dating to late nineteenth and early twentieth

centuries; the photographs, however, are not dated.

ii. Post-1947 photographs of restoration/conservation works.

i. Archaeological Survey and Department of Archaeology reports, showing

interventions made over time.

To carry out systematic documentation that is easily retrievable, the HFP devised

an inter-related numbering system. This provides a number for each structure as

well as its primary, secondary and decorative elements.

The following work comprised phase one of the PDC programme (2003-04).

a. A topographical survey plan of the Lahore Fort, providing the traverse,

location and footprints of all buildings, structures and spaces, along with

gradients and spot levels.

b. Detailed graphic and photographic documentation of the Shah Burj,

including the Shish Mahal - essential, given the ongoing conservation work in

a. Site Plan

b. Basic Drawings

c. Photographs

d. Reports

52

Page 75: Lf Master Plan

this and related structures.

c. Preliminary graphic and photographic documentation of all other structures

in the Lahore Fort, comprising floor plans of structures bordering the various

quadrangles. These will be incorporated into the topographical survey map.

d. Preparation of dossiers for each identified quadrangle/ building/ structure,

based on information extracted from various Federal Department of

Archaeology reports.

The existing laboratory facilities comprise a tile workshop and a lime laboratory,

both directly associated with Lahore Fort, as well as the Central Archaeological

Laboratory, which is a national facility of the Federal Department of

Archaeology. The tile workshop and lime laboratory produce materials for use in

restoration projects within the site. The Central Archaeological Laboratory deals

with conservation of artefacts, including ceramics, coins, paper and tile.

Several of the 10 members of staff have relevant qualifications and some specific

skills. However, there have been no opportunities for further training or

upgrading of skills.

Set up in the 1960s and 1970s, the laboratories have received little or no upgrading

since in terms of equipment and materials. All of the equipment and machinery is

outdated and most no longer works - or if it does, no one knows how to use it.

An adequately equipped laboratory is therefore essential - one capable of

handling the monitoring, maintenance and conservation requirements of a

World Heritage site. In addition to up-to-date equipment and materials,

upgrading the facility also means properly staffing it with appropriately trained

personnel. The scope of its work also needs to be clearly defined and prioritized.

A large volume of architectural material has accumulated in various parts of the

site. This is neither in inventoried storage nor on display. This valuable material is

therefore unavailable for study or use in conservation, and is at risk because it is

not under curatorial care. Most of it is material removed from various elements

during restoration and reconstruction projects. There is a need to determine the

original locations of these elements and if possible replace the facsimile with the

original. All other material should be curated.

5.2.5 Conservation laboratory

5.2.6 Archaeological repository

53

Page 76: Lf Master Plan

5.2.7 Skilled artisans in traditional building crafts

Conservation work at Lahore Fort requires a skilled workforce of artisans trained

in traditional building crafts. Previously, a large number were trained whilst they

carried out restoration and spent a lifetime working on the monuments under the

Department's control. There were many opportunities to learn, since replacement

and replication were then acceptable 'conservation' practices. As funding became

scarce, artisans' posts were abolished and those formerly employed by the

Department's took up other kinds of work. The long-standing tradition of master

- apprentice training broke down. As a result, there is a serious shortage of young

people training in and entering these trades.

In the limited cases where replacement and reconstruction occurs, work is let out

to contractors who may or may not be able to employ the best artisans available.

Whilst there may be a case for occasionally using contractors for specialized or

specific tasks, the practice should be strictly discouraged for conservation work.

There is ample evidence of unsatisfactory work by contractors that has been

detrimental to the historic structures. This practice of awarding work to

contractors, while trained artisans decrease in number, is the main cause of

unsatisfactory work. Without adequate supervision, sympathetic conservation

and restoration work is impossible.

Building a resource collection of building crafts, comprising examples of all

materials, art forms and styles, would greatly assist in the conservation of Mughal

architecture. This would serve as a design reference for staff training and to

produce items for sale, based on historic motifs and materials in the collection.

Issue 11: The many critical conservation situations which need to be addressed and the

lack of set priorities for addressing them

Issue 12: The need for an updated, professional overall approach to planning and

implementing conservation in keeping with international standards and

guidelines

Issue 13: The importance of a detailed and standardized documentation system

Issue 14: The urgent need for a reorganized, focused and upgraded conservation

laboratory

Issue 15: The need for a centralized system for storage of architectural fragments,

material samples, artifacts etc. with computerized inventory

Issue 16: The need for re-installation of original building elements

Issue 17: The lack of publications and other resources on conservation issues

54

Page 77: Lf Master Plan

Issue 18: The shortage of trained skilled artisans in traditional building crafts to carry out

conservation work

Issue 19: The need for a resource collection of building crafts for conservation work and

for product design

Issue 20: The importance of in-house execution of conservation works rather than

reliance on outside contractors

There is no comprehensive and systematic monitoring of building condition or

maintenance of structures at Lahore Fort. The current situation is described in

Annexure 2,

. This is largely due to staffing limitations. There is, for example, only

one Assistant Archaeological Engineer to maintain and monitor all the

monuments in the care of the Northern Circle. At the site, one Archaeological

Conservator and three members of staff are responsible for all specialist

maintenance. The wide range of professional expertise needed to safeguard such

a large and complex monument is lacking, with inevitable results.

Routine maintenance is based on verbal instruction; systematic records are kept

only in exceptional circumstances. Separate systems do not exist to monitor the

condition of the monuments and implement required maintenance. There is only

one team doing this, with no system of cross-checking and certification. In

addition, no specific research or site investigations are carried out in advance of

conservation and maintenance interventions.

In the past, the Federal Ministry of Culture, Sports, Youth Affairs and Tourism

monitored conservation work done by the Federal Department of Archaeology

on approved master plan or development schemes using PC-IV and PM-I pro

formas. Designed for use on new work, these pro formas, which are still used, are

unsuitable for monitoring conservation work because they do not provide

adequate baseline information about the buildings and interventions.

This is highly unsatisfactory because the lack of baseline information and absence

of an efficient reporting and monitoring system creates a situation where the

decision to follow accepted conservation principles is left to the discretion of

Table 5.2 List of conservation issues

Management and Monitoring Systems for Conservation and Preservation

of Lahore Fort

5.3 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE ISSUES

5.3.1 Routine monitoring and maintenance

5.3.2 Monitoring of conservation works

55

Page 78: Lf Master Plan

those actually executing the work. Given that the quality and expertise of those

executing work varies enormously, careful and systematic monitoring is

critically important.

There are a number of areas with ruins and structural remains at or just above

ground level at the site. At present, there is no specific protection or maintenance

of these remains and they are subject to damage by the elements and people

walking and climbing on them. Fabric and built elements are being dislodged and

eroded. Continued damage of this kind will result in the loss of important

archaeological evidence.

Over several decades, the department has concentrated on conservation and

restoration and paid insufficient attention to the basic cleaning of historic

structures. Federal Department custodians could recall only one instance, when

the Naulakha Pavilion was cleaned with Sepiolite, and that was several decades

ago.

Grime, fungi and deposits of chemicals have accumulated on all surfaces,

resulting in damage to an extent that remains undetermined. The failure to clean

these may have due to a misapprehension; that this would remove a protective

patina that had formed on these surfaces, and was therefore neither a desirable

nor an essential part of a maintenance programme. It may also have been due to

lack of staff to undertake such work. Whatever the reasons, the result is that

today, from a distance, the Lahore Fort appears a desolate, derelict and unkempt

site; the opposite of the glorious image it should present.

Cleaning is important, and not solely for appearance. It is not possible to make

informed decisions about the maintenance and conservation of monuments

when they are covered in filth. Regular cleaning is a necessary first step in the

conservation process.

Another source of damage is the dampness caused by watering plants in close

proximity to structures. In the case of the foundations of the , on the

perimeter of the Maidan-e-Diwan-Aam, shrubs planted in the area enclosed by

the foundations of cell walls are regularly watered. This damages the remains.

5.3.3 Maintenance of ruins and archaeological remains

5.3.4 Cleaning of monuments

5.3.5 Damage from watering of plants

dalans

56

Page 79: Lf Master Plan

Issue 21: The lack of regular and systematic monitoring of the site

Issue 22: The lack of regular maintenance of the site, based on need

Issue 23: The need for a system to monitor conservation works carried out by the

department and under department supervision

Issue 24: The need for an approach to the maintenance of ruins and ground level

archaeological remains

Issue 25: the general filth of the monuments and need for regular cleaning,

Issue 26: The need for a review of the planting regimen in view of damage being caused

to remains / structures / foundations

The current state of knowledge and research at the Lahore Fort is characterized by

a lack of focus and breadth. No formal research programme is presently in place

at the site, although various initiatives have begun as part of the Government of

the Punjab's Project for the Conservation and Preservation of Lahore Fort.

To develop a greater understanding of the Lahore Fort and its context, plan and

configuration, it is important to develop the means to allow scholars to continue

interpreting its historical layers. Historical data and information generated

through research will enable an authentic presentation of the site to visitors by

bringing the Mughal era to life through its association with the different quarters

and quadrangles.

Many questions remain unanswered, due to lack of systematic and sustained

research in past decades. Translations of material available in English provide

insufficient information about the citadel's buildings, incremental additions to

these and use of various quarters. Only a few contemporary historians' accounts

have been translated from Persian into English or Urdu, and there is a great need

to develop other source material in Persian located in many libraries in Lahore

and elsewhere. In the past, there was little emphasis on research within the

Department itself; in spite of housing one of the finest antiquarian libraries, there

are not even bibliographies of source material.

The present Government of the Punjab Project for the Conservation and

Preservation of Lahore Fort started to address this need in 200304, by compiling

Table 5.3 Monitoring and maintenance issues

5.4 RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION

5.4.1 Overall situation

57

Page 80: Lf Master Plan

dossiers in the HFP format to provide source material on interventions.

A proposed Pakistan Conservation Institute would also contain cells to address

these needs. Meanwhile, some of the components are already in place in a nascent

form as part of the present Government of the Punjab Project for the Conservation

and Preservation of Lahore Fort. The various components now need organizing,

and the additional funds sought to make them fully functional and able to inter-

relate with other components. These will then provide the necessary information

and background to conservators and researchers, as well as enabling those

presenting various aspects of the Fort to do this in an authentic fashion.

At present, there is no publication policy or strategy and very little material about

the site has been produced. The Archaeological Reports contain some; however,

given the importance of the site, there needs be a constant flow of information; of

not only work undertaken but also in-depth studies and research based on

historical records. Publications need to be available in both print and electronic

soft copy for the widest possible dissemination.

In 1959, a major excavation examined the stratigraphy of the mound on which the

site is located. An area, 180 feet by 60 feet in the southeast portion of the Maidan,

was excavated to a maximum depth of 50 feet. The continuous series of twenty

cultural levels recorded date from the British period, through to pre-Mughal

deposits. The Mughal levels revealed multiple layers of intensive and large-scale

building activity. Below a seven-foot layer of debris and fallen mud brick

indicating disturbance, a clearance revealed a 12 foot-high wall of mud bricks

possibly representing the non-Muslim mud brick fort recorded as having been

sacked by Mahmood of Ghazni during his sub-continental campaigns.

No other archaeological investigations have take place, with the exception of

incidental excavations associated with conservation works.

The present Library is a valuable research resource. It contains some rare

publications dating from the eighteenth century, along with various

archaeological survey reports dating from nineteenth century. In spite of being

one of the best antiquarian libraries in Pakistan, it lacks adequate resources and

equipment. There are not even funds for binding antiquarian volumes; there is

7

8

5.4.2 Publication

5.4.3 Archaeological research

5.4.4 Library

58

Page 81: Lf Master Plan

insufficient and unsatisfactory storage equipment; the furniture is old and

dilapidated; and there is no modern equipment except a single computer donated

by UNESCO in 2004. The manual index makes it difficult to locate research

material.

Lack of control over book issuing is a major problem. All Department officers are

entitled to borrow books from the library; many have not bothered to return the

rare ones issued to them and many important publications and documents are

now missing. Furthermore, the illustrations have been stolen from most of the

library's remaining antiquarian books.

A great deal of information in the form of archival maps and antiquarian

photographs is housed in the Lahore Fort. However, material is presently

scattered, un-catalogued and inadequately stored. This non-availability of

information is a great obstacle to publication or conservation research. A full

inventory of material is therefore required to improve ease of retrieval. Archival

material also needs to be stored in an acid-free environment.

Issue 27: The lack of research and a research focus to induce scholars to undertake studies

regarding various aspects of the Qila

Issue 28: The need of a publication policy or programme to generate basic, reliable data

Issue 29: The need for archaeological research.

Issue 30: The need to upgrade the library at the site; enlarging the collection, equipment,

hardware and library software

Issue 31: The need to store and catalogue archival material located at the site

Table 5.4 Research issues

Many visitors to Lahore Fort are largely unaware of the impact of their behaviour

on the site. Some have inflicted a great deal of damage to original elements

through graffiti on fresco work and other surfaces, some of which is irretrievable.

Involuntary damage also occurs through treading on original pavements,

climbing over walls and touching fragile decoration.

5.4.5 Archival material

5.5.1 Threats from uncontrolled visitation

5.5 SITE VISITATION

59

Page 82: Lf Master Plan

Details of visitation to Lahore Fort are contained in Annexure 3,

. Gate statistics reveal that in the peak month of March, up to

135,000 visitors enter the site; the lowest level is in the winter months (December

and January). The largest numbers of visitors are concentrated into 10 or 11 public

holidays, when as many as 35 to 40,000 people enter the site on a single day. It is

doubtful whether such levels are sustainable at a World Heritage site, even one

much better equipped, staffed and managed than the Lahore Fort. Most visitors

come in groups of from four to 20 or 30 people, with men far outnumbering

women. The majority of visitors belong to low and middle-income groups and

arrive by public transport. The literacy level of most visitors is low.

Visitors follow undesignated routes, with most interest shown in the Maidan-e-

Diwan-e-Aam and the interior of the Shish Mahal, as well as the Hazuri Bagh and

Badshahi Mosque outside the citadel. Large portions of the site within the citadel

are never visited. This is not surprising, as signs only exist in popular areas.

Few activities or events are organized at the site, except for the free Karavan

Pakistan events held for the first time in 2004. Other events are often for a select

few invited dignitaries and guests, rather than the public as a whole.

The visitors' main interest does not appear to be the historical aspects of the site,

but in using it for recreational purposes. There is little understanding of the

monument's history and, accordingly, a general disregard for proper behaviour

and treatment of the site as an important national monument. This is aggravated

by a lack of creative signage, tours and sources of information for the visitor.

Ensuring that visitors understand the significance of the site must be one of the

main aims of the Master Plan and the overall approach to presentation.

Some fragile areas of the site are at immediate risk from inappropriate visitor use

and numbers. Emergency measures are needed to curtail damage while an

overall policy for visitation and visitor control is put in place.

At present, there is no means to protect the monuments from visitor damage

except by cordoning off certain areas and restricting access. Additional, indirect

means education, information and persuasion - need to be developed and

combined with direct methods. Where necessary, protective measures can range

from complete closure of areas, to temporary barriers and increased numbers of

guards.

Visitor

Management Plan

5.5.2 Emergency protection of fragile elements

60

Page 83: Lf Master Plan

5.5.3 Estimating visitor capacity

5.5.4 Interpretation and education

Visitor numbers, particularly the huge surges in public holidays, are far greater

than certain areas of the site can accommodate. In addition to damaging fragile

parts of the monument, this scale and pattern of visitation also compromises the

quality of the cultural experience. Determining optimum visitor capacity is

challenging because it means identifying the exact level beyond which negative

impacts, particularly involuntary damage, becomes evident. However, tracking

these impacts through a monitoring programme will at least provide the basis for

setting approximate estimates of capacity. It will also help in designing measures

to mitigate damage, particularly to fragile areas likely to suffer from excessive

visitation.

Nov. 1999 72,977 3,785 4,500 81,262

Dec. 25,294 7,35 3,150 29,179

Jan. 2000 74,132 3,989 2,300 80,421

Feb. 77,790 2,860 3,350 84,000

Mar. 124,209 5,667 4,500 134,376

Apr. 97,263 3,820 4,360 105,443

May 78,773 3,525 4,150 86,448

June 66,873 4,179 38,000 109,052

July 95,967 5,372 36,000 137,339

Aug. 87,158 5,435 32,000 124,593

Sept. 57,406 1,849 28,000 87,225

Oct. 70,495 2,419 10,315 83,229

There is no comprehensive policy on interpreting and presenting the site, except

for a few boards erected in recent years. While an interpretative gallery would be

effective source of information, there are also low-cost solutions to educating

visitors. At present, these economical alternatives are lacking and need to be

developed. They include proper signage, leaflets, and informed guards and local

guides who can provide educational information to visitors in simple language.

Month Adults Children Students Total

TOTAL 928,337 43,625 170,625 1,142,597

1999

2000

2000

2000

2000

2000

2000

2000

2000

2000

Table 5.5: Visitor numbers from November 1999 to October 2000

61

Page 84: Lf Master Plan

There is also no educational material in local languages - Urdu, Punjabi, Pashto

and Seraiki - and few knowledgeable local guides available at a rate most visitors

can afford.

There are two museums at the site; the Fort Museum, located in Jahangir's

Khwabgah, in Jahangir's quadrangle, and the Sikh Gallery housed in the

(house) of Mai Jindan. Both display some rare items; the Sikh Gallery is a

particularly valuable but under-exploited resource for developing an

understanding of the period when the Sikhs used the citadel as their base.

Although both museums are a great source of curiosity to visitors, present

standards of presentation are unlikely to satisfy this.

The following issues need addressing:

there is no inventory of the paintings and artefacts housed in museums;

placed in front of alcoves with exhibits on their rear walls, a

considerable distance from the viewer;

exhibited without environmental controls.

There are many visits by schools, especially during the cooler weather when

constant streams of large parties visit different parts of the site. The citadel

appears to draw more school parties than any other any monument in Pakistan,

and therefore needs to offer a wide variety of activities to provide children with a

means of interaction. At present, school groups, including the teachers, tend to

5.5.5 Museum displays

5.5.6 Young visitors

haveli

there is no printed brochure or other material available for information to

visitors;

display cases, designed and installed through a Japanese initiative in the

1980s, are

the glass surfaces of display cases are dirty;

the lighting system is inadequate;

exhibit black cloths are faded, torn and dirty;

the labels at the bottom of displays provide almost no information;

the labels are on faded and discoloured paper;

all galleries are dirty and in need of redecoration;

information panels in place in the Fort Museum are not being used;

valuable paper exhibits, including manuscripts, miniatures and paintings, are

62

Page 85: Lf Master Plan

play ball games and leave mounds of fruit peel. However, such groups are

amenable to advice and with a little effort can become champions for

safeguarding heritage structures. While sensitizing the general public about the

value of the historic site may appear a daunting task, schools as organized groups

can easily be provided with information which will foster a greater

understanding of the site and the behaviour expected while visiting.

In the past, no facility has existed within the Lahore Fort for liaison between the

site administrators and the local community to involve them in its safeguarding.

Residents of Lahore, and particularly the nearby areas, have had no involvement

in caring for, interpreting or investing in the site.

Similarly, there are no programmes to engage women or other sectors of the

community in safeguarding the site and developing a 'duty of care'. Ways to

involve large numbers of people need to be put in place, so that every visitor

becomes aware of his or her responsibility in safeguarding the historic

environment.

The present outreach programme, run by Karavan Pakistan, encourages the

involvement of schools in activities related to the site, as highlighted above.

However, there is a great need to re-establish links between the Lahore Fort and

its surrounding community through the youth and women of the walled city.

This will not only recreate the lost relationship between the citadel and the

community, but also promote income-generating activity that benefits the local

community.

The Government of the Punjab Project for the Conservation and Preservation of

Lahore Fort is taking steps in this direction; employing eight women of the site's

housing colony on a half-day basis to clean site structures. The women are direct

beneficiaries of the heritage conservation project, which has greatly improved

their economic condition.

At present, the PDC is also acting as a proxy Karavan Pakistan office at the site.

Because of the success of these recent events, and a vocal and visible expression of

interest from the local community to be involved in the future of their heritage, a

dedicated officer has been assigned to run a community outreach office at the site

as part of the present project. However, to make this initiative fully effective it is

important to develop a Community and Youth Outreach Cell (CYOC) as part of

site management.

5.5.7 Community outreach

63

Page 86: Lf Master Plan

5.5.8 Restoration of historical access and links

5.5.9 Tourist facilities

5.5.10 Community craft production

At present, public access to the Lahore Fort is from the Alamgiri gateway; a ramp

entering through the British postern gate and Shahjahani Hathi Pol provides

vehicular access. The British built the ramp for easy movement of troops and

equipment while the original Akbari gateway remained closed to the public. This

controlled entry to the British cantonment, established in the Lahore Fort after the

annexation of the Punjab. When the cantonment subsequently moved out of the

site, its southern periphery was opened out; the creation of a large area of

ceremonial steps there made for ease of surveillance and control. After

Independence, this British period access route was maintained.

Studies for the UNESCO report on and

those carried out by the HFP, support the proposal that the original access from

the walled city through Akbari gateway be opened to re-establish the historic link

between the Lahore Fort and the walled city. This is important because it would

revitalize the original Shahi route, providing access directly from the walled city's

Delhi Gate to the Lahore Fort. Access to the walled city would become easier, with

the diverse activities and ambience of the historic core heightening the site

visitor's cultural experience whilst economically benefitting the community as a

whole.

At present, visitor facilities are generally either insufficient, as is the case with the

provision of toilets, or are inappropriately located - examples include car parking

in Hazuri Bagh and the canteen and shops in Dalan-e-Sang-e-Surkh. Other

facilities and services are poorly designed and intrusive in the context of the site,

including the drinking fountains, ticket booth and limited signage.

There are no centres providing information about the site and its historical

significance and no organized educational activities, particularly for the many

visiting school children. Visitors are starved for information; when a new sign is

put up, it is read by almost everyone. Activities, such as the UNESCO craft

workshops in the Shah Burj, draw in people who are eager to talk with and learn

from the participants. This is something that to be taken advantage of and

developed.

There is a need to encourage women in the community around the Lahore Fort to

make cultural products using the designs found in the monument's various

structures. Planned first steps towards this involve encouraging women of site's

Cultural Tourism in Lahore and Peshawar,

9

64

Page 87: Lf Master Plan

housing colony making handicrafts items for sale. These products will need an

outlet: one that enables the women to sell directly. In collaboration with the PDC,

the CYOC can provide facsimiles of designs and other information to help in the

production of craft products.

The Lahore Fort is used for special events, usually for fund-raising when large

numbers of elite are entertained while the site is closed to the public; sometimes

for several days at a time. These events often involve food preparation,

installation of lighting and sound systems, opening of fragile parts of the site to

visitors and, occasionally, horses and fireworks. Although staging of theatrical

events can bring vitality to the site and can be a valuable interpretive tool, there

have to be restrictions on its indiscriminate use and guidelines for staging of

events.

Similarly, plans to re-use historic buildings for tourism need to ensure that any

modifications to meet contemporary requirements are appropriate and properly

carried out. There are many instances where modern utilities and conveniences

have been installed without due care for original fabric and materials, resulting in

long-term damage to structures.

Issue 32: The need for emergency measures to protect fragile areas of the Qila which are

being damaged by uncontrolled numbers of visitors and use of direct and

indirect methods for controlling large numbers of visitors

Issue 33: The need for assessment of the carrying capacity of the site

Issue 34: Inadequate information about and interpretation of the Fort to visitors; the need

for a comprehensive interpretive policy; the need to relocate visitor services and

amenities to minimize impacts on the historic site

Issue 35: The poor condition of the Museums and the sub-standard quality of displays

and presentation

Issue 36: The need to address a lack of understanding and the feeling of ownership and

commitment within the community, particularly youth

Issue 37: The need to recreate links with the Walled City and re-open original access

routes to the site

Issue 38: The need for guidelines on the use of areas of the site for special events

Issue 39: The need for standards and methodologies to guide adaptation of historical

buildings for modern tourism use

5.5.11 Use of historical buildings and areas for events

Table 5.6 Site visitation issues

65

Page 88: Lf Master Plan

5.6 ENVIRONMENTAL AND PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES

5.6.1 Overall situation

5.6.2 Environment in the areas surrounding the site

a. Vehicle movement and resulting pollution

Environmental conditions in and around the site are a threat to its preservation

and integrity. Details about existing conditions are in the

Annexure 4. Key issues include the impact from

roads encircling the site, problems with drainage and solid waste removal,

parking, access and electricity. The overall situation is aggravated by a lack of

coordination between city authorities, responsible for infrastructure and

services, provincial authorities, responsible for strategic planning in the area, and

site management. This lack of integrated urban planning has led to the site being

isolated from planning initiatives for its immediate environs. The result is a

continual worsening of the environmental problems that adversely affect its

structural fabric and fragile decorative elements.

Lahore Fort is surrounded on all sides by roads: the Grand Trunk or Circular

Road on the north side, Fort Road on the east and south sides and minor access

roads such as Hospital Road to the west. The present approach to the site is

from the heavily congested Circular Road, via a narrow roadway opposite

Iqbal Park. Parking is available for a limited number of vehicles in Hazuri

Bagh.

Traffic on Circular Road is the greatest source of pollution. This road is also

used for parking vehicles, in the lane adjacent to the northern periphery of the

site. This contributes to the accumulation of garbage and wastewater. The

movement of heavy traffic causes excessive vibration, detrimental to the

stability of the historic structures. It is also generates high levels of noise.

Vehicle emissions from traffic and the nearby bus terminus are another source

of pollution. The most pervasive problem is the suspended particulates in

these emissions, which cause soiling of the buildings. Nitrogen dioxide

seriously affects colours and materials, as do other emission-borne pollutants

like ozone and hydrogen sulphide that bleach the colours of frescoes and alter

pigmentation. This is a particular threat to the picture wall.

The fumes and dust created by the high volume of traffic along the northern

periphery of the site have also caused encrustation and corrosion. Proposed

re-routing of most heavy vehicular traffic away from the site along the new

Ravi Link Road will help in alleviating the problem. However, the main

Environmental and

Physical Infrastructure Study,

66

Page 89: Lf Master Plan

polluters smaller vehicles and motor rickshaws need to be banned from this

road; it should be open only to vehicles running on compressed natural gas

(GNG).

The Federal Antiquities Act requires a 200-foot buffer zone to be maintained

around major cultural heritage sites. Many of the environmental problems

facing the Lahore Fort today are a direct result of the failure to enforce this. In

reality, there is no buffer zone in place; the result of a lack of coordination

between the Federal Department of Archaeology and the local

administration, and determined effort by all concerned parties.

Encroachments into this buffer zone include major roads (the Grand Trunk

and Fort Roads) light industry, a rim market, car, bus and truck parks, utilities

and a garbage collection site. Areas of potential green belt, including Ali Park

to the south of Fort Road and the area between the citadel wall and the Grand

Trunk Road on the northern side of the site, are poorly maintained and

rubbish-filled. Failure to maintain and enforce the buffer zone poses a number

of potentially serious threats to the condition of the site, some of which are

already evident. These include:

i. the impact of pollution, dust and vibration caused by heavy traffic,

mentioned above;

ii. encroachment of light industry in the buffer zones, resulting in air

pollution and the dumping of garbage and industrial waste;

iii. the use of Ali Park, in particular, as a dump for solid waste from the walled

city, with two large containers for waste collection and numerous adjacent

dumps of debris;

iv. the use of this park by drug addicts, who contribute to its untidy, garbage-

filled state;

v. the lack of visitor's toilets at the Lahore Fort and Hazuri Bagh, resulting in

open areas being used as public facilities;

vi. defacement and damage to the citadel's walls, through graffiti, the pasting

of posters, removal of building materials and direct attachment of high

voltage cables and transformers;

vii. the above factors all contribute to the general appearance of dereliction in

the areas surrounding the Lahore Fort, presenting an extremely negative

image of Pakistan's premier World Heritage site; an image that does not

inculcate pride and a sense of proprietorship within the local community.

b. Encroachment in the environs of the Lahore Fort

10

67

Page 90: Lf Master Plan

c. Integrated urban context

5.6.3 Physical infrastructure of the site

a. Sewerage and storm drainage systems

Situated in the centre of Lahore and surrounded by dense urban

development, the site is subject to the adverse consequences of encirclement

by busy roads, factories, threatening encroachments and inappropriate urban

land use. Failure to enforce the buffer zone exacerbates this; a no-man's-land

of unauthorized structures and activities, it provides no protection to the site.

Success in addressing the external environmental issues that affect the site

will determine the effectiveness of its preservation. Its future is integrally

linked to issues of population growth, housing and traffic control and routing

in adjacent city areas. The site is presently a lacuna in urban land use and

zoning plans, with no recognition of the need to use planning tools to protect

it and to maximize its potential in generating cultural tourism.

The proposed upgrading and control of the fort's environs will create a zone

with high land values and development potential. Developing this area for

cultural tourism associated with the site will inevitably lead to opportunities

for income generation within the local community, particularly in the walled

city. Clear guidelines need to specify what types of tourism and culturally

related development are acceptable in the area around the site, in order to

ensure its protection and maintain a suitable buffer zone and setting. Cultural

heritage impact assessments are useful tools for evaluating development

proposals and their potential impact on historical fabric, intangible cultural

heritage and the cultural integrity of the site and the neighbouring walled city.

The staff colony's existing sanitation system discharges wastewater into a

common open drain that ends at the site's north wall. This wastewater then

falls for 50 feet across the wall's surface. The colony's toilet facilities are

minimal; they are unlit, in extremely poor condition and without flushing

arrangements. Waste enters a septic tank and then an open drain, which

discharges it onto the brick embankment wall near the picture wall. The staff

colony's substandard drainage, sewerage and solid waste disposal systems

are a source of many problems at the site, as well as for colony residents.

There are 55 public toilet facilities at the site, of which only 21 are available for

use. Most of the site's 'functioning' facilities either leak, causing structural and

decorative damage, or do not flush.

Storm water has caused serious damage in the southwestern part of the site, in

the area of the administration offices and PIATR hostel. Saturation of infill

68

Page 91: Lf Master Plan

dating from the British period, on which these structures stand, has caused

settlement and major structural damage to buildings.

Along the citadel's north wall, near the picture wall, there are number of storm

water outlet spouts on the wall, believed to be either Sikh or British additions.

The strong winds that often accompany heavy rain blow water from these

down the wall's decorated surface. Rising damp also affects this area of the

wall.

It is difficult to determine original drainage levels, gradients and courses. This

information has not been recorded when new floors have been subsequently

laid (and re-laid) in many areas of the site. It also likely that many of the

original falls were even reversed, compounding the drainage problem.

This lack of documentation about the historical drainage system hampers

comprehensive drainage planning. Although the present Government of

Punjab Lahore Fort Project has mapped some of the internal drainage lines, a

lot more still need investigating.

The site's water supply comes from two tube wells. In addition to providing

water used to maintain the gardens and lawns, they also supply the offices,

staff colony, outside road vendors and public lavatories at the site. One is

located on the site's southwest side, across the road from Ali Park; the other is

in the northeast corner, in the nursery area. Both function adequately but

inefficiently, due to the age and condition of the pumps. Pipes, valves and

hydrants are in a state of disrepair, as are the leaking and overflowing

overhead tanks.

The site management has not maintained water pipes and those supplying the

rest house bathroom and the west suite of Jahangir's quadrangle have

continued to leak for years, with disastrous results for the original structure.

These leaks are still awaiting repair. A hydrant in the western section of

Maidan-e-Diwan-e-Aam continues to leak, creating a constant puddle of

water; it, similarly, continues to await attention.

The worst example of this kind of damage to historic structures is in the

northern chambers, caused by water leaking from ablution taps. Although

they were finally blocked, it was only after severe damage to the chambers

and a crack appearing in the Moti Masjid's northern wall. An unchecked leak

in a first floor toilet pipe was also responsible for cracks appearing in the

library building (one of the southern suites of Jahangir's quadrangle) and the

Kharrak Singh Haveli.

b. Water supply and distribution

69

Page 92: Lf Master Plan

c.

d.

Solid Waste

Electrical systems and lighting

An average 34000 visitors per day to the site, along with up to 200 employees

and the families of 40 of these, generate solid waste. Trimmings, leaves and

clippings from garden maintenance supplement this. This produces an

average of two to three tons of solid waste per week, depending on the season

and whether any demolition or construction works are in progress. Seventy to

eighty per cent of this waste is biodegradable; the rest is recyclable paper,

plastic, glass and metal or construction materials.

Organic waste is buried for later use as compost. Other waste either goes into

bins or is stored in open heaps. Sweepers empty the bins weekly, using fabric

sheets to transfer waste into a collection vehicle. Some recyclable material is

removed, but abandoned building material often remains in piles on site for

long periods. Wells are also used for dumping solid waste, contaminating

ground water.

Perhaps the biggest issue is the large amount of rubbish thrown on the lawns

and in other open spaces by visitors. This is not discouraged; though there are

rubbish bins in prominent locations, visitors rarely use them. Site custodians

appear to accept the throwing of rubbish around the site; this has to then be

picked up. This is an unsatisfactory state of affairs: if people were encouraged

to use bins, there would be less picking to do. Janitors regularly clean the

grounds, although waste is allowed to accumulate in less well-visited areas.

The current electrical distribution system comprises five transformers located

on site, of which four are active and the fifth used occasionally. All main cables

into the site terminate at distribution boxes attached to the four corners of the

monument. An additional overhead cable enters on the southeast side of

Jahangir's quadrangle, the site's old office area.

Brackets, installed by the Water and Power Development Agency (WAPDA)

to support overhead main cables, are severely damaging the citadel's walls.

These cables need re-routing to permit removal of brackets from the eastern

and northern fortification walls. The distribution network is satisfactory apart

from the distribution boxes, all of which are in poor condition and incapable

of carrying any additional load.

There is very little illumination in and around Lahore Fort, for either security

or recreational purposes. The only interior lighting comes from recently

installed floodlights, located at the Alamgiri Gate main entrance and in

Jahangir's quadrangle. Any proposed illumination must enhance the overall

70

Page 93: Lf Master Plan

cultural experience, not just the recreational activities of evening visitors. Its

installation and operation must not compromise the integrity of the historic

structures.

The existing security system relies on manual monitoring of the site by

Department of Archaeology guards, assisted by the recently installed

floodlights mentioned above. The system is inefficient because there are

insufficient guards and no system of accountability. Security in the museums

on site is also inadequate, and a number of thefts have taken place in recent

years. Although more guards are required, site staff also need greater powers

to stop any destructive activities.

Issue 40: The need to assess alternative parking locations

Issue 41: The need to reduce heavy traffic in the environs of the site, and resulting

emissions.

Issue 42: The need to remove offenders and upgrade the environment and ensure that

controls are put in place to maintain standards within the buffer zone

Issue 43: Setting up formal links at city government level to ensure that conservation and

planning for Lahore Fort is carried out within an Integrated Urban Planning

Context

Issue 44: The need to establish Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment procedures

Issue 45: The need to identify where uncontrolled water is damaging the monuments and

find ways to control and reroute, including the removal of all toilets from

historic structures

Issue 46: The provision of better toilet facilities which do not adversely impact on the site

Issue 47: Control of garbage deposition and a more efficient removal system along with

Karavan “No-Litter” motivational and educational campaigns

Issue 48: Removal of electrical facilities, cables and wiring which is directly impacting on

monuments; design of a sympathetic illumination system for night time use of

the site

Issue 49: The need for improvement in lighting for evening use

Issue 50: Upgrading security at Lahore Fort in general and specifically in the museums

e. Security

Table 5.7 Environmental and physical infrastructure issues

71

Page 94: Lf Master Plan

5.7 STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES, OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS (SWOT)

SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE Lahore Fort WORLD HERITAGE SITE

A complex array of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats influences the

future preservation and management of the Lahore Fort. The site is, without question, of

extreme cultural significance to Lahore, Pakistan and the world. There is a high level of

visitor interest in the site, even though the monuments are in poor to critical condition

and visitors are offered virtually nothing in the form of interpretation or facilities. It is

clear that the site's present vulnerability, and the accumulated dangers to it, threaten to

overwhelm and negate its strengths. This is mainly due to a consistent failure in the past

to maximize strengths, and create or take advantage of opportunities for developing the

site's potential.

This situation is now changing because of the Government of the Punjab Project for the

Conservation and Preservation of Lahore Fort. Implementation of an international

standard documentation programme, creation of specialist crafts workshops and

research cell, staging of community events at the site and formation of a community

outreach cell all mark a substantial shift in approach in the right direction. These activities

also form the initial phase in the restructuring of the hitherto dormant PIATR as a new

and expanded Pakistan Conservation Institute.

A fundamental change in the approach to conservation is also taking place because of the

involvement of national and international experts in emergency action to save the Shish

Mahal's mirrored ceiling. In conjunction with discussions regarding the contents of the

Master Plan, this programme is prompting radical rethinking on issues regarding

appropriate levels of intervention and the protection of the authenticity of heritage

resources.

References

1.

p. 94-7.

2. Federal Antiquities Act 1975 (Act VII of 1976).

3. UNESCO, , Islamabad, 2003.

4. Khan, Muhammad Ishtiaq, West Pakistan Circle,

1973 (unpublished).

5. see , No.1, 1964: p.55-6

6. , op. cit., p.

7. ibid., p.

8. , op. cit., 55-6

9. , op. cit., p.

10. Federal Antiquities Act 1975, op. cit., Clause 22.

State of Conservation of the World Heritage Properties in the Asia-Pacific Region, Pakistan: Fort and

Shalamar Gardens in Lahore,

Cultural Tourism in Lahore and Peshawar

Master Plan: Lahore Fort Preservation and Restoration,

Pakistan Archaeology

Cultural Tourism in Lahore and Peshawar

Pakistan Archaeology

Cultural Tourism in Lahore and Peshawar

72

Page 95: Lf Master Plan

73

Strengths Weaknesses

Opportunities Threats

— High cultural significance as reflected

by World Heritage status

visitors reflected in visitor numbers

Centre, workshops and other initiatives

involvement in conservation of Shish

Mahal

Dormant status of PIATR

Lack of a comprehensive vision of

conservation

associated higher profile at national level

educational and performance venue

with the Walled City & its monuments

Community

and local women for production of

women's crafts to spread tourism

benefits to local community

— Poor state of conservation and

maintenance of all parts of the site

— Popularity with local and national — Inadequate documentation

— Lack of on-going research

— Setting up of Project Documentation — Problematic management and funding

procedures

— National and international expert — Insufficient trained staff

— Failure to integrate Lahore Fort into

city planning and administrative

— Close proximity of the historic urban systems

Core and community of Lahore — Lack of community involvement in

walled City custodianship of the site

— Preparation of the Lahore Fort Master — Lack of economic benefits to the

Plan community from Qila tourism

— NORAD-UNESCO-GOP project and — Established conservation approach

— Insufficient custodial care

— Controlled use of the site as an — Environmental issues in and around

the site

— Research potential of the site — Uncontrolled and uninformed

— Creation of cultural tourism linkages visitation

— Continuing degradation of the Buffer

— Associated economic benefits for local Zone due to lack of provincial and city

level cooperation

— Revival of PIATR as PCI — Lack of trained personnel

— Availability of local youth as guides — Insufficient allocation and delayed

release of funds

Table 5.8 SWOT situational analysis at Lahore Fort World Heritage site

Page 96: Lf Master Plan

74

Page 97: Lf Master Plan

PART 6

Programme for Action

75

Page 98: Lf Master Plan

76

Page 99: Lf Master Plan

PART 6

PROGRAMME FOR ACTION

6.1 INTRODUCTION

This section of the Master Plan presents a series of integrated action plans developed

from expert input and designed to address the issues highlighted in the previous parts of

the Plan. These actions constitute the key processes of cultural resource management at

Lahore Fort, the aim of which is to achieve the vision set out for the future of the site in

both the short and longer term.

In the short-term or first three years:

identify historical buildings and features in need of emergency action and

design and implement first aid measures;

citadel's conservation and management;

making in a context of national and international standards of best

practice;

to formulate new approaches to solving problems requiring new

partnerships and initiatives;

conservation management;

displays in place and provide maps, brochures and other sources of visitor

information;

authentic information;

6.1.1 Short-term vision

take all steps necessary to arrest further degradation of the monument;

put in place standard operating procedures for basic tasks carried out as part

of the

engage a wide range of stakeholders in decision-making, framing this

decision

tackle environmental issues that can be addressed using existing means and

start

put in place monitoring and maintenance systems as the basis of sound

set a design standard for information display and signage, put basic, first-step

create a mechanism for on-going community and youth outreach;

create a framework for continuing research to form the basis of presentation of

develop the means for ensuring that the grounds are well looked after and

clean.

' - '

77

Page 100: Lf Master Plan

6.1.2 Longer-term vision

In the longer term:

the site, in order to preserve its cultural significance and

authenticity;

understand the history and significance of the site in its

contemporary context.

The following simplified model (Figure 6.1), adapted from

shows the

process of cultural resource management proposed for the site.

In this model, heritage conservation and management follow a sequence of key

processes starting with the identification and assessment of heritage resources.

This follows through into maintenance, conservation, infrastructure

development, research and public presentation of the site. There is a continuous

feedback loop between each of the key processes and the strategic management

process. Strategic management is a major process in itself that includes the

organizational planning cycle and its links with external agencies.

The Programme for Action reviews the issues presented in Part 3 of the Master

Plan. It defines the overall approach, framing issues as objectives and actions

required to meet these. Table 6.1 shows the correlation between the issues raised

in Part 3 and the action plan objectives presented below. It also recommends

specific operational tools to assist in implementing proposed actions.

Each Action Plan is summarized below and, where relevant, fully appended in

Annexes 2 to 4. Located at the end of this section, the Lahore Fort

ObjectivesAction Plan 2006 2012 (Tables 6.49) presents each of the Action Plan

objectives; its level of priority, target date for implementation, identification of

milestones and responsible agents, and resources needed.

achieve the highest standard of conservation for all remaining historical

elements of

develop a holistic, efficient and practicable management strategy for the site;

upgrade the environment in and around the site;

enhance visitor enjoyment and understanding of the citadel, with further

research to

Best Practice in Cultural

Heritage Management. Best Practice in Cultural Heritage Management,1

78

Page 101: Lf Master Plan

Figure 6.1: Model of cultural resource management

6.2 SITE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

The role of the site management is 'to conserve the heritage resource and to serve the

public interest, provided this is not detrimental to the site.' An effective management

structure, mechanisms and tools must be in place to allow the team to administer in as

informed and efficient a manner as possible. To meet this objective, a proposed site

management strategy will integrate conservation, training and sustainable management

tools into a system of consultation. The intention is to assist the site's custodians in

efficiently manage it.

2

SiteManagement

Strategy

Resource Inventoryand Assessment

Visitation Plan

Monitoringand

MaintenanceProgrammes

ResearchConservation

Strategy

Environment andPhysical Infrastructure

Plan

79

Page 102: Lf Master Plan

80

SITE MANAGEMENT

Issues Objectives

CONSERVATION ISSUES

1. Need for an integrated SMS 1 Proposed Management Structure:

management system Site Commission + Technical

Committee + Management Team

2. Need for diversified funding SMS 2 Diversified Funding Scheme

approach

3. No way to accommodate SMS 3 Proposal for Friends of Lahore Fort

contributions in kind

4. Lack of ways to acknowledge SMS 4 Recommendations to be implemented

contributions through Friends of Lahore Fort

5. Uninformed management team SMS 5 PowerPoint workshops

6. Lack of training in conservation SMS 6 Pakistan Conservation Institute

and related subjects

7. Basic job skills unidentified SMS 7 Core Competency training programme

8. Scope of jobs not well defined SMS 8 Standard Operating Procedures

9. Management tools under-utilized SMS 9 Logical Framework Analysis, UNESCO

Heritage Audits, Risk Assessment and

Management and Geographic

Information Systems (GIS)

10. International and regional SMS 10 Recommendations for linkages and

support network lacking networking

11. No set of priorities for carrying COS 1 Conservation Action Priority Table

out conservation

12. Need for set procedures for COS 2 Step by step procedures for

planning and carrying out implementation of Conservation

conservation work work

13. Standardized documentation COS 3 Continuation of the existing Project

Documentation Centre; Heritage

Foundation formats for Baseline

Survey Folios, History of Intervention

Dossiers, Condition Surveys and

Documentation Catalogues

14. Inadequate lab support for COS 4 Proposals for Conservation

conservation Laboratory

15. Scattered and un-inventoried COS 5 Proposals for a centralized Materials

architectural material Repository

Page 103: Lf Master Plan

81

16. Original elements unused COS 6 Proposals for the reinstallation of built

elements

17. Lack of conservation library COS 7 Proposals for a Conservation Resource

Library

18. Shortage of skilled crafts people/ COS 8 Architectural Crafts Training

artisans Programme

19. Need for a craft resource COS 9 Proposals for a Craft Resource

collection Collection

20. Employment of unskilled COS 10 Development of in house conservation

contractors capabilities

21. Lack of regular and systematic MM 1 Monitoring System

monitoring of the site

22. Lack of regular maintenance MM 2 Maintenance System

based on need

23. Conservation work carried out MM 3 Proposals for monitoring of

with inadequate supervision conservation work

24. Ruins and above ground MM 4 Proposals for the protection of

archaeological remains archaeological remains

degrading and at risk

25. General filth of monuments MM 5 Systematic cleaning programme

26. Damage from planting and MM 6 Review of Plantation

watering regimen

27. Lack of research and a research REF 1 Outline of a Research Framework

strategy

28. Lack of publications of data REF 2 Lahore Fort Publication Programme

and material

29. Lack of archaeological research REF 3 Programme of Archaeological

Investigations

30. Poor condition of the library REF 4 Proposals for Library Upgrading

31. Archival material at risk REF 5 Proposals for Archival Collection

32. Unprotected fragile areas VIP 1 Emergency Protection Plan

and uncontrolled crowds

33. No idea of appropriate VIP 1 Recommendations for Carrying

visitation levels Capacity study

MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE

RESEARCH

SITE VISITATION

Page 104: Lf Master Plan

82

34. Lack of interpretation for visitors VIP 2 Recommendations for an Interpretive

Policy

35. Poor state of museums VIP 3 Museum upgrade proposal

36. Need for community outreach VIP 4 Community Outreach Office

37. Severed historical links with VIP 5 Recommendations for Consultant

Walled City Study of Links with the Walled City

38. Inappropriately located visitor VIP 6 Recommendations for relocation of the

services and amenities canteen and other visitor services

39. Damage from uncontrolled VIP 7 Recommendations for Historical Site

events and uses on site and 8 Use Guidelines and Adaptive Re-use

of historical buildings

40. Uncontrolled parking in EPI 1 Proposals for the revitalization of the

environs of the site Buffer Zone

41. Parking issues and entry into EPI 2 Recommendations for parking

the site arrangements and change of site entry

42. Impacts of heavy traffic around EPI 3 Phased approach to traffic rerouting

the site and pedestrianization

43. Failure of communications EPI 4 Recommendations for an Integrated

between site & city on planning Urban Conservation Planning and

and management issues Land Use Study

44. No controls over development EPI 5 Cultural Heritage Impact Assessments

in the environs of the site

45. Damage to the site from poor EPI 6 Long & short term recommendations

drainage for drainage improvements

46. Inadequate and poor toilet EPI 7 Proposal for additional toilets in

facilities appropriate locations

47. Litter and garbage on site EPI 8 Proposals for upgraded waste removal

and community outreach initiatives

48. Electrical encroachments on EPI 9 Proposals for electrical upgrading and

to the monument removal of encroaching facilities

49. Popular evening hours wasted EPI 10 Recommendations for evening

opening of the World Heritage Site

50 Poor security arrangements EPI 11 Recommendations for improvements

to security

ENVIRONMENTAL AND PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Table 6.1: Correlation between the Issues raised in Part 3 of this report and the Action Plan Objectives

Page 105: Lf Master Plan

83

6.2.1 Overall strategy

6.2.2 Site Management Strategy (SMS) objectives

Background to the strategy

The fundamental aim of site management is retain all those elements that make

the place significant and give it meaning.

'What separates the management of heritage sites from other forms of property

management is that the fundamental purpose of cultural heritage management

should be to preserve the values ascribed to a site be they aesthetic or historical or

social. Heritage sites are not simply visitor attractions, there to provide customer

satisfaction and a reasonable profit. Such places are defined by the values we

attach to them.'

By using an approach developed by Parks Canada called 'Commemorative

Integrity’ , it is possible to evaluate the success or failure of Lahore Fort's current

management. This examines a site's health and wholeness through three basic

questions:

Are the resources that represent the site's importance impaired or under

threat?

When we ask these questions about the Lahore Fort, the answers are all

unfavourable; they tell us that the 'Commemorative Integrity' and authenticity of

the site are seriously at risk and that management style and approach needs to

change.

The following objectives aim to improve management at the site and identify the

necessary remedial action. They form the core of the Site Management Strategy;

Tables 6.4 - 6.9 present this and all other aspects of the Action Plan, giving priority,

target dates, key responsibilities and resources needed for its successful

implementation.

: Structures For Custodianship and Oversight

Safeguarding the site's universal values requires a framework to be in place - a

framework that ensures:

all stakeholders participate for the benefit of the site;

3

4

Have the reasons for the site's designation been effectively communicated?

Has the site's heritage value been taken into consideration in decision-

making?

SMS OBJECTIVE 1

a.

Page 106: Lf Master Plan

compliance with Master Plan objectives;

periodic review of implementation procedures and direction for future activity;

consultation before any conservation work starts.

It must also ensure transparency, particularly where conservation work is concerned,

making this a requirement for government agencies, non-governmental

organisations or heritage conservation organisations. A lot of damage has already

been done to the site in the name of conservation; without such a framework, more

will undoubtedly occur in future.

The recommends setting up a

Site Commission to effectively manage a World Heritage site. The

acknowledge that the professional and administrative structure of such a Site

Commission 'may vary according to the situation in each country or the character of

the site, but [that] its members should be experienced specialists from various

professions. Also, it is in the interest of the World Heritage Site that the Site

Commission's relation to the national government should be such that it has sufficient

freedom of action.'

In this respect, the Government of the Punjab's Project for the Conservation and

Preservation of Lahore Fort has demonstrated its effectiveness. It has not only helped

in changing the mindset of the Department of Archaeology, but also set the direction

of future work.

A Project Implementation Team is in place. Consisting of a National Advisor,

National Project Coordinator, Deputy and expert Technical Committee appointed by

the team, they study all issues before any work begins. They have also been successful

in continuously supervising and evaluating work in progress.

A Project Steering Committee also exists. Although its terms of reference are not as

comprehensive as an Executive Committee or Site Commission's would be, it has

been extremely useful in reviewing work done and setting directions for future work.

This Committee will remain in place until the end of the present Government of the

Punjab Project for the Conservation and Preservation of Lahore Fort in 2006

Board or Site Commission may be set up.

Given the success of the present management approach, the Master Plan proposes the

following structure for both of Lahore's World Heritage sites the Lahore Fort and

Shalimar Bagh (Gardens).

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites

Guidelines

5

.

Thereafter, an Executive

b. Proposed management structure for Lahore's World Heritage sites

84

Page 107: Lf Master Plan

i.

ii.

iii.

iv.

c.

i.

Lahore World Heritage Sites Executive Board

Site Commission

Technical Committee

Project Implementation Team

Composition and responsibilities

Lahore World Heritage Site Executive Board

A high-level board, to be chaired by the Chief Minister, Government of Punjab

and responsible for taking major decisions and ensuring cooperation between all

agencies and stakeholders.

Comprising representatives from all interested bodies, the Site Commission will

provide the forum where they will be able to actively contribute to safeguarding

the site and its environs.

Consisting of external experts in related disciplines, the Committee will provide

advice and guidance and examine the impact of proposed works at the site. They

will also check work in progress.

Comprising department officials and an external advisor, this would be modelled

on the existing project team. They will prepare proposals and be responsible for

day-to-day execution of work.

The Executive Board would comprise:

a Chairperson: Chief Minister, Government of the Punjab;

a Vice Chairperson: either the Federal Secretary, Ministry of Culture,

Government of Pakistan or the Representative, UNESCO Islamabad;

Members:

— Chief Secretary, Government of the Punjab;

Secretary, Department of Culture, Government of the Punjab;

two technical experts;

Member/Secretary: Director General, Department of Archaeology,

Government of the Punjab.

The Executive Board would be responsible for:

appointing the Technical Committee, Project Management Group and

consultants;

encouraging sponsorship of the Lahore Fort Heritage Fund;

approving ways of acknowledging contributions in money or kind;

directing ways to increase public awareness, communication and

information;

approving policy on types and locations of activities.

85

Page 108: Lf Master Plan

The Executive Board would meet twice a year, with Vice Chairperson officiating if

the Chairperson is unavailable.

The Site Commission would comprise:

— Representative, UNESCO Islamabad;

Secretary, Department of Culture, Government of the Punjab;

a representative from the Federal Department of Archaeology,

Government of Pakistan;

Chairperson, Culture Standing Committee, Government of the Punjab;

Two Members of the Punjab Provincial Assembly (MPAs), one of whom

should be a woman MPA;

Nazim, City District, Lahore;

Town Nazim, walled city;

Three technical experts.

The Site Commission would be responsible for:

and

traffic management;

information and community and youth outreach.

The Site Commission would meet twice a year, with Vice Chairperson officiating

if the Chairperson is unavailable.

This three to five-member committee needs to include experts in the fields of

architecture, archaeology and hydraulics and engineering. If required, additional

members can be co-opted from a pool of relevant experts and consultants.

Committee membership would be on a three-year rotational basis, with a new

member joining every year.

The Technical Committee would be responsible for:

ii.

iii.

Site Commission

Technical Committee

a Chairperson: Chief Secretary, Government of the Punjab;

Members:

Member/ Secretary: Director General, Department of Archaeology,

Government of the Punjab.

implementing the Master Plan 20052011;

three and six-yearly reviews of the Master Plan;

referring any deviation from the Master Plan to an Experts Committee;

coordinating reports from concerned agencies on environmental issues

reviewing priorities identified by the Project Management Group;

determining ways to improve public awareness, communication,

setting work priorities in relation to Master Plan recommendations;

86

Page 109: Lf Master Plan

providing regular advice and guidance to the Project Implementation

monitoring conservation activity;

reviewing consultants' proposals.

a conservation architect;

a conservation engineer;

an archaeologist;

site supervisors;

a procurement officer;

an accountant;

a community liaison officer;

preparing proposals for work to be carried out in relation to Master Plan

preparing detailed conservation proposals and procedures for

organizing conservation work and supervising this while it is

developing proposals for protection, recording and research;

proposing ways to attract sponsorship for the attention of the Executive

supporting community and youth outreach programmes and liaison with

evaluating and submitting reports on the impact of municipal development

Team;

assessing the impact of conservation proposals;

The team will include a Team Leader, assigned from the department to solely

work on the monument. The team would comprise:

Conservation, maintenance and monitoring teams will work under the supervision

of the Project Implementation Team. In turn, these teams will collaborate with the

Documentation Centre, Research Cell and Community Outreach Cell. The Project

Implementation Team will support the Community & Youth Outreach Cell.

The Project Implementation Team would be responsible for:

recommendations;

implementation;

progress;

Board;

voluntary heritage organizations;

and traffic projects around the site.

Community and heritage interest groups, along with other organizations, can

play an important role in supporting the work of the site's custodians. The Master

Plan recommends organizing a 'Friends of Lahore Fort' to harness the enthusiasm

of voluntary sector groups who will be valuable in awareness and fund-raising

work, and in developing site facilities like the laboratory and library. There are

many examples of active and successful groups of this type in the region.

iv

v.

Project Implementation Team

Support organizations

87

Page 110: Lf Master Plan

Technical Committee (TC)

Members:

Tasks:

3-5 Member ExpertsCommittee Drawn fromArchitecture, Archaeology,Hydraulics, Structural Engineering;Additional members from Pool ofMembers for Specific Activity.

Determine Priorities in Contextof Master PlanProvide advice, guidance toPMTEvaluate Impact of ConservationProposalsMonitor Conservation ActivitiesReview Consultants' Proposals

Site Management Group (SMG)

Members:

Tasks:

Team Leader (UNESCO/ Dept ofArchaeology), Conservation Architect;Conservation Engineer; Site Supervisor;Procurement Officer; Accountant; CommunityLiaison Officer

Proposals for Execution in context of MasterPlanDetailed Methodologies for ConservationOrganize & Supervise ConservationProposals for Protection, Recording, ResearchMethodologies for Sponsorships for SCCollaborate with NGOs for Community/YouthOutreach ProgramsSubmit Reports of Impact of MunicipalDevelopment and Traffic in Qila Environs

SITE COMMISSION (SC)

Tasks:

Chairman: Vice-Chairman:

Members:

Appoint Technical Committee, Project Management Team and ConsultantsReview Reports from Agencies re Environmental & Traffic ManagementEnsure Implementation of the Master PlanOversee Review of Master Plan after 3 years and 6 yearsReview Conservation Priorities Formulated by the Project Management TeamEncourage Sponsorships of Lahore Fort Heritage FundFinalize Mode of Acknowledgment for Contributions in Funds or KindGive Approval to Kind, Mode and Location of Activities by External Agenciesaccording to Guidelines Set in the Master PlanDetermine Modalities for Public Awareness, Communication, Information,Community and Youth Outreach

Chief Minister Punjab; Federal Secretary, CultureUNESCO/WHS Representative; Secretary Culture, Punjab; DG/Director

Federal Archaeology; District Nazim Lahore; Town Nazim Walled City; Representatives ofLahore Fort Heritage Fund, Technical Committee, Project Management Team; TourismIndustry

Refer Deviation from Master Plan to Experts Committee

Figure 6.2: Diagram of the proposed management structure

88

Page 111: Lf Master Plan

SMS OBJECTIVE 2

a. Government allocation

b. Gate money

c. Environmental fund

: Adequate financial resources augmented by a diversified

funding base

A focused approach to funding is needed; one that ensures the custodians of Lahore Fort

have a flexible and diverse funding base with which to apply management decisions and

carry out systematic conservation. Previous Federal Department of Archaeology funding

fell far short of what was actually required. With the site's handover to the Government of

the Punjab, more funding is being allocated. However, it is important to also explore other

sources.

Figure 3 details alternative sources and additional approaches for building a sustainable

funding base. The goal is to ensure that there is sufficient funding for periodic monitoring

and site maintenance, as well as for emergency and longer-term conservation projects.

The most effective way to achieve this is through the cooperation and active involvement

of the site's major stakeholders: the local community, conservation professionals, site

custodians and the tourism industry.

Funding for the preservation and management of the Lahore Fort comes from the

following sources.

The Government allocation, or grant, funds salaries, utilities and systematic

monitoring and conservation programmes at the site. The Government of the Punjab,

who now administer the site, are responsible for making this allocation.

Master Plan recommendations assume that gate money collected will go into a non-

lapsable fund for direct investment in the site - an assumption based on an

undertaking given by the Federal Ministry of Culture to this effect. As a working

guideline, the Master Plan recommends diving gate revenue in the following ways:

fifty per cent for conservation and the proposed regular preventive maintenance

programme;

fifty per cent is divided between research, outreach and visitation, to ensure

bottom line funding for all main sections of the Master Plan.

The Site Commission would establish such a fund. They would be responsible for

ensuring that this used to implement environmental and planning improvements.

This would include addressing issues in the site's environs, such as buying out the

rim market and special garbage collection. The Government of the Punjab

Government is also expected to contribute to this fund.

89

Page 112: Lf Master Plan

d. National and international special project funding

e. Lahore Fort Heritage Fund

f. Crafts Fund

Provided for specific Action Plan projects or proposals, UNESCO should, through

special project teams, manage the allocation of funding from international and

national donors and sponsors.

Funds need to be readily available to tackle emergencies. Government funding, tied

by administrative hurdles, is rarely available when emergencies occur. However, on

many occasions immediate 'first aid' emergency measures can save historic fabric

from major damage and greatly reduce subsequent costs. By establishing an

endowment fund, it is possible to build up reserves for this purpose and other specific

activities.

The Lahore Fort Heritage Fund would be an endowment fund. Anyone wanting to

support the upkeep of the site could contribute. A Board of Governors would manage

the fund, comprised of members contributing substantial sums - for example, 2

million Pakistani Rupees or more. The interest earned can provide funds for 'first aid'

measures.

Ways of accessing or allocating funds could comprise:

on the basis of a First Information Report (FIR) issued by the Site Engineer/

Architect;

approved by the Technical Committee.

Four craft workshops are currently operating, set up and supported through the

present Lahore Fort project. The project has covered material costs and artisans

salaries for two years. In future, revenue generated from the sale of craft products and

replicas could go into a special crafts fund to help ensure the project's sustainability.

However, further funding to establish more craft workshops will have to be

generated separately. The potential exists for the project to continue on a long-term

basis if there is sufficient output from the workshops and retailing is properly

organized through site outlets, exhibitions and online sales.

Craft products are also an ideal way of generating visitor interest. Effective marketing

of these would:

review and recommendation by the Project Implementation Team, confirmed by

the Technical Committee;

approval of the Fund's Board of Governors;

on the basis of a completion report by Site Engineer/Architect;

through review of a completion report by Project Implementation Team,

90

Page 113: Lf Master Plan

provide regular employment to artisans involved in their production;

provide a workforce who would also be able to carry out conservation work;

raise visitor awareness of the value of traditional craft skills;

create a range of quality mementos of the site, based on authentic replicas;

help create a worldwide awareness of the value of the fort.

Proper marketing of craft workshop products requires a strategy, based on a study of

small souvenir products that meet market needs and the standards necessary for their

design and production. Although techniques, motifs and materials should be

traditional, the products should need to be innovatively designed to appeal to the

modern market. The strategy will need to plan for wide distribution and retail

success, thereby increasing the financial returns of crafts production.

The Master Plan recommends establishing a revolving fund to attract donations in

cash or kind to finance research projects. UNESCO could also assist in finding

funding for this purpose.

A percentage of all sales made at the site should go into to the Research and

Publication Fund.

Activity organisers need to be aware of the site's historical significance, and events

need to be compatible with this. Areas designated as fragile and of high cultural value

are not for use. Wherever possible, events should be open to public. If admission is

charged, it can provide an opportunity to raise funds for preservation of the site. A

percentage of the takings should go into the Research and Publication Fund, to

finance the development and dissemination of further public information.

The provides a useful model for ways of

integrating multiple stakeholders and funding approaches into a successful

conservation effort. Based on Asian best practice in fiscal management and

sustainability of heritage resources, these models and associated documentation are

available on the world wide web.

A mechanism to take advantage of contributions in kind

Although large-scale funding is required for conservation and maintenance,

contributions in kind and services will also add to the contribution base. Actively seeking

and acknowledging these is a task for a 'Friends of Lahore Fort' group. They could also

g. Research and Publication Fund

h. Retail outlets and sales at the site

i. Special Event Charges

SMS OBJECTIVE 3:

UNESCO Lijiang Models for Co-operation6

91

Page 114: Lf Master Plan

create lists of goods and services needed at the site, actively seek donors and organise

fund raising and publicity events.

Contributions can be in the form of materials, equipment and, most importantly, time

donated by individuals with various skills wishing to participate in efforts to safeguard

the site.

It is important to pursue programmes for contributions of expertise and knowledge from

other parts of the world. Individuals with specific knowledge and experience in dealing

successfully with environmental and conservation problems in historic sites elsewhere

could, for example, be supported by their governments or other agencies to work on

specific projects. These could include the conservation of Mughal frescoes or remedying

the rising damp presently affecting buildings.

: Mechanisms for acknowledgement of contributions

All contributions of funds, materials, equipment or time need proper acknowledgment.

Ways of doing this include:

building;

The Friends of the Lahore Fort could, in conjunction with the site's Documentation

Centre, write prepare and distribute material of this kind.

SMS Objective 4

discreetly placed plaques acknowledging support in the conservation of a specific

a large board at the entrance to the site acknowledging major contributors and the

kind of assistance provided;

using the media to promote projects at the site, and their supporters;

producing flyers to update visitors on work-in-progress and planned projects, and

acknowledging the support of organizations, corporations and individuals.

92

Page 115: Lf Master Plan

Government Allocation

Gate Money

Environmental Fund

Special Fund National/

International Sponsors

Lahore Fort

Heritage Fund

Crafts Fund

Research and

Publication Fund

Retail Outlets/ Sales

Special Events Charges

Administration, Salaries, Utilities, Systematic

Monitoring, Ground Maintenance

50% for Conservation & Maintenance of Historic

Structures; 50% for Research Community Outreach

To be established by Punjab Govt; overseen by SC

For Environmental and Traffic Improvement

To be coordinated by UNESCO for conservation

by UNESCO Site Management Group

Endowment Fund with its Board of Governors;

Interest to be Utilized for Emergency Works

To be established for

Sustainability of Craft Workshops

To be Established for promotion of

Research & Publications

Major % for Conservation & Maintenance

Major % for Conservation and Maintenance

FUNDING SOURCES

Figure 6.3 Diagram of the proposed diversified funding approach

93

Page 116: Lf Master Plan

SMS OBJECTIVE 5

SMS OBJECTIVE 6:

: An informed management team who understand overall

conservation objectives and priorities / managing change

An agreed set of core plans and guidelines needs to drive all cultural resource

management work at the site. They will need to demonstrate clear links between

planning and operational activity, in the same way the Master Plan does. The aim is to

provide a concise summary of values and principles to apply as a litmus test of

departmental practices.

It is essential that all staff understand the conservation theory and guidelines that support

the administration's approaches and decisions. The

states that this must include 'ensuring that all site staff understand

the cultural values to be preserved in the site.' Ensuring they do will engender

commitment and increase motivation.

The Master Plan recommends using a number of specially designed PowerPoint

presentations to target all staff, ranging from senior management to security and grounds

staff. They need to summarize the Plan's overall intent and methodology, and integrated

action plans and priorities, tailoring this to focus on the important role a given group will

have to play in reaching Plan goals. By incorporating presentations into regular, twice-

yearly workshops, there can also be discussion of issues raised. For conservation staff this

will also provide opportunities to discuss the challenges they face and learn from each

other.

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization could provide

support for conducting these workshops, in the form of PowerPoint presentations and

coordinating overall planning with Project Implementation Team.

Development of the Pakistan Conservation Institute as a

viable training facility

The existing PIATR provides training in archaeology and related topics. Archaeological

training is also available at several universities in the country. However, the theory and

practice of conservation is not taught anywhere in Pakistan and a study on

recommended that an institute be set up at Lahore Fort

specifically for this purpose.

The PCI would offer training at all levels in a wide range of fields related to the

conservation and management of cultural heritage. This would include short term

certificate courses and longer term diploma programmes; subjects would range from

basic skills to specialist training, both theoretical and hands-on, with an emphasis on

training future trainers to extend skills through institutions and departments across the

country. Curriculum planning at the PCI will draw on a comprehensive interpretation of

what contributes to good conservation, as well as identifying those who can both provide

and benefit from new skills and upgrade existing ones.

Management Guidelines for World

Cultural Heritage Sites

Cultural

Tourism in Lahore and Peshawar

7

8

9

94

Page 117: Lf Master Plan

PAKISTAN CONSERVATION INSTITUTE

Board of Governors

Conservation Training Documentation Centre

Laboratory

Building Crafts Training

Restructuring & Upgrading of PIATR

Federal Secretary, Ministry of Culture, Representatives of Federal Department

of Archaeology, DGs of Provincial Departments of Archaeology, Culture and

Tourism, Public and Private sector Universities, Heritage NGOs, Experts

Post-graduate diploma in

Studies

Training of Trainers

Publications Related to

tion Issues, Manuals, Reports etc.

� �

� �

� �

Graphic and Photographic

Conservation Documentation, Condition Surveys,

Certificate Courses in Conservation Inventories, Recording

Related Topics and Heritage Guides

Upgrading of Existing Laboratory Upgrading of Existing Library

Provision of Suitable Equipment Acquisition of Conservation

Training of Trainers Publications, Academic Publications

Conserva-

Training under Master Artisans

Improvement of Production Techniques

Production of Cultural Replicas

Research & Publications

Figure 6.4 Diagram showing the formation process of PCI

95

Page 118: Lf Master Plan

Upgrading Venue

and Basic Technical

Resources

Formation of the Board of

Governors

Appointment of Director

and Assistant Director

Design of Programme

based on Best Practice and

identified trainee needs

Enlisting of Training

Providers

Begin Training at PCI

Funding Sponsorships

UNESCO Asian

Academy for Heritage

Management

SMS OBJECTIVE 7: Core Competency training for all levels of staff to upgrade

skills and build capacity within the department

Training in core competencies needs to comprise the first stage of a conservation training

programme. The Lahore Fort management have identified this as being essential for the

following staff at the site.

Site Cleaners.�

Site Guards.

Gardeners.

Heritage Guides.

Virsa (Heritage) Volunteers.

Skilled artisans engaged in preventive conservation.

Skilled artisans engaged in maintenance.

Supervisors.

Technicians.

Utility Inspectors.

Assistant. Curator.

Figure 6.5 Diagram showing the structure of the Pakistan Conservation Institute

96

Page 119: Lf Master Plan

Museum Curator.

Librarian.

Archivists.

Conservation Architects (post-diploma and refresher courses).

Conservation Engineers (post-diploma and refresher courses).

Conservation Manager.

Preventive Maintenance Managers.

Community/ Youth Outreach Specialists.

make people think about which tasks are essential;

clarify what these tasks should entail;

illustrate how various tasks depend on and compliment each other;

standardize the most efficient and productive ways of doing essential tasks.

perform the job;

design equipment used in an SOP;

perform maintenance on equipment involved in an SOP;

have an overall understanding of the management and conservation processes a

The Master Plan recommends a UNESCO consultancy to design training manuals for

each of these job groups. By consulting employees, it should identify ways in which they

can all best support heritage preservation efforts and advance the Master Plan's goals and

action programmes. The UNESCO-ICCROM Asian Academy can assist in identifying

core competency areas, designing training modules and providing tuition.

Implementation of standard operating procedures (SOP) for

frequently performed tasks to ensure consistency and

maintenance of standards

A SOP is a systematic set of instructions for a common task in a specialized area.

Designing and implementing a series of SOPs for essential management and

conservation work at Lahore Fort will:

Standard operating procedures clearly define everyone's responsibilities. Staff will know

what to do, how and when to do it and the role they play in the overall conservation effort.

Standard operating procedures will evolve out of the core competency training exercise.

By preparing detailed evaluations of the skills required for each job, it is then possible to

itemize each job description. This will then highlight core common tasks for which SOPs

should be prepared.

Ideally, SOPs are prepared as a group exercise by teams including people who:

given SOP fits.

SMS OBJECTIVE8:

97

Page 120: Lf Master Plan

SMS OBJECTIVE 9:

a. Logical framework analysis (LFA)

b. External UNESCO Heritage Audits

The systematic integration of analytical management tools

into the short and long term planning carried out by the

custodians of the site

Use of LFA needs to become standard practice, as an analytical, presentational and

management tool. These help planners and managers:

analyze the existing situation during project preparation;

The product of this analytical approach is the matrix, or Log frame. This summarizes

what the project intends to do and how, the key assumptions and how outputs and

outcomes will be monitored and evaluated.

Many agencies, including UNESCO, either require or endorse the use of LFA. Their

application in the planning of a programme and budget for future actions at the site

showed how useful this tool is in guiding thinking and decision-making.

Another recommended management tools for implementation is the UNESCO

Heritage Audit. This ensures that the values for which the site was inscribed on the

World Heritage List are being maintained. Section 3.1.1 of the Master Plan describes

these values.

An independent group of experts appointed by UNESCO will review the entire site,

carrying out a quadrangle-by-quadrangle and building-by-building assessment and

preparing an independent condition report. The Audit should take place every three

years, with the first one needing to take place immediately to identify baseline

conditions for future comparison.

A Heritage Audit specifically examines the following types of issues.

establish a logical hierarchy of means by to reach objectives;

identify the potential risks to achieving objectives and sustainable outcomes;

establish how to best monitor and evaluate outputs and outcomes;

present a summary of the project in a standard format;

monitor and review projects during implementation.

� Relative technical or artistic value:

Rarity value:

are characteristic crafts, motifs and materials being authentically maintained and

skills supported?

are all periods of Mughal and Sikh architecture and design being preserved with

an appreciation of their strengths and differences?

98

Page 121: Lf Master Plan

P

:

hysical and visual value:

Economic value:

Educational value

Recreational and social value:

is the view of the site unimpaired by modern development and encroachment and

does it present an image of a well cared-for monument? Are historical links with

the city around it intact?

is there income generation at the site through well-planned economic activity,

and is this being generated without negative impacts? Is the stakeholder

community feeling the benefits?

is active research taking place and being disseminated to the community so that

more is known now than before?

are events at the site appropriate and is the community drawn into its care in an

informed way?

Cultural heritage faces many kinds of risks. These range from natural hazards, such as

floods and earthquakes, to those attributable to human activities: fire and pollution;

wear and tear, and the unexpected and unintended consequences of public visitation.

The advises that 'special

precautions may be needed against vandalism, theft, fire, floods and earthquakes.'

The site needs a risk assessment and management study, as one has never been

carried out before. The International Centre for the Study of the Preservation of

Cultural Property has been active in developing and advocating the need for risk

preparedness to protect cultural heritage. Their manual is a useful guide for

defining the scope of such a study at the Lahore Fort.

Table 6.2 presents a Risk Assessment Model which can be used to monitor and

evaluate potential risks at various stages of a project. At the planning stage it can

encapsulate risk issues and help in formulating recommendations to address them.

At detailed stages of a design more specific statistical input can allow for more

focused mitigation to reduce risk to an acceptable degree. This model should be

developed for Lahore Fort as a whole and for individual heritage elements and

incorporated into the specialist study recommended above.

c. Risk assessment and management

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites10

11

99

Page 122: Lf Master Plan

Hazard Hazard Vulnera-

L,N)

Risk = Mitiga- Residual Emerg-Probabilty bility HxV tion Risk ency

(1=low- (1=low- ( H,M, (H,M,L,N) Plan5=high) 5= high)

High humidity/

salt corrosion

Fire

Storm Water

Flood

Waste Water

Discharge

Earthquake

Thermal Stress

Lightening

Structural Damage

Termites

Birds/ Bats

Bacterial infection

Air Pollution

Rubbish

Traffic vibration

Bombing

Vandalism

Theft

Inappropriate

fabric maintenance

Cleaning

Visitor accidents

Loss of key staff

Loss of funding

Table 6.2 Risk Assessment Model format

100

Page 123: Lf Master Plan

d. Geographic information systems (GIS)

SMS OBJECTIVE 10

Geographic information systems provide an invaluable tool for centralizing and

adding spatial information to textual based data. Geographic information systems

are an efficient tool for responding to queries, enabling confident and rapid analysis

of situations and visualizing of patterns, trends and relationships in data. It is

particularly relevant in situations where the needs and demands of a number of

agencies and interests need integrating to develop workable solutions.

GIS mapping of the physical planning and infrastructure of the site and its environs

will allow quick highlighting of problem areas requiring impact assessment or

immediate action. It is also an important tool for graphically conveying conservation

needs to decision-makers and planners.

The Master Plan recommends a UNESCO GIS consultancy. Its terms of reference

would need to include the following points.

i. Setting up of a purpose-designed GIS Database for the site:

developing a basic user interface to serve as a query tool;

ii. Training of management team staff:

: UNESCO assistance in creating a support network of

international collaboration and interaction

To a large degree, the site's custodians have been working in isolation with little of the

valuable support that international or regional collaborative involvement can offer. It is

only since 2003, and the start of present project, that they have started to build links with

outside institutions and organizations.

The points out that 'an important

issue in relation to the management of World Heritage Sites is to establish a process that

gives a solid basis for international collaboration between those responsible for the site

management and the various international bodies such as the World Heritage

Committee, UNESCO, ICCROM and ICOMOS.' This could also include collaborative

programmes, communication and exchange with academic institutions, research and

non-governmental organizations. In addition, the Lahore Fort project is seeking

12

13

rationalizing existing data;

standardizing existing and future data.

to ensure a sustainable programme;

based on elementary computer literacy;

designed to produce competent GIS Database administrators;

involving trainees at all stages of database development to build capacity.

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites

101

Page 124: Lf Master Plan

assistance from UNESCO Islamabad and the Office of the Regional Advisor for Culture

for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, to expand the range and scope of international

involvement with Pakistani heritage professionals.

The conservation strategy aims to achieve long-term sustainable preservation of all the

tangible and intangible aspects that give significance to the site. In the shorter term, the

focus is on emergency measures to assure that endangered heritage is not lost to future

generations. The whole approach to conservation must be embedded in an

understanding of international standards and best practice. Interventions must be

appropriate to the situation and the decision to conserve based on well-judged priorities.

The overall conservation strategy addresses the following issues of immediate

concern at Lahore Fort (Figure 6.6).

a. The urgent need to identify, document and conserve all of the site's

original/historical elements. This means all structural, decorative and design

features which pre-date Independence (1947). Mughal period elements are a

priority because the World Heritage inscription recognizes the monument's

cultural significance as a Mughal palace complex.

b. Measures to prevent further deterioration in the condition of the various

historic structures, through basic stabilization and preservation work.

c. Carrying out of all conservation work in line with Master Plan priorities, to

ensure best use of any available funding. Following this policy will streamline

preservation work. It will also simplify the application process with donors

and help safeguard the site's value and authenticity.

d. Ensuring that conservation work follows set and approved procedures; that

no work begins without full discussion and detailed planning, and that work

done is fully documented and follows international best practice.

6.3 CONSERVATION STRATEGY

6.3.1 Overall Strategy

102

Page 125: Lf Master Plan

CONSERVATION ACTION

Detailed Graphic & Photographic Documentation

Detailed Condition Survey

Establish Requirements for Action:

Prepare Drawings for Works to be Executed

Action to Ensure Reversibility and Safeguarding

of All Original Elements

Prepare Report of Work Accomplished

(Heritage Foundation Pakistan (HFP) Format,

Numbering System and Schedules)

Develop Details and Studies

on HFP Initial Survey

Emergency work, Stabilization

Preventive Conservation/ Maintenance

Stabilization, Conservation

Based on Baseline Documentation

Carry out Full Graphic & Photographic

Documentation During Progress

History of Interventions

From Dossiers developed

Based In Collaboration with HFP

Figure 6.6 Diagram Illustrating Proposed Flow of Conservation Activities

103

Page 126: Lf Master Plan

6.3.2 Conservation (COS) Objectives

COS OBJECTIVE 1: All works to be carried out according to Conservation Action

Priority List

Past work at the site did not consider structural needs. Many structures that could have

been saved with comparatively small expenditure suffered, while work was carried out

on buildings that were in a relatively good condition. For this reason, the Master Plan

includes a Conservation Action Priority List (Table 6.12) to direct funds toward the most

vulnerable structures.

Based on room-by-room condition surveys by HFP, the list in Table 6.10 includes

standing structures belonging to the Mughal, Sikh and British periods. Basements are not

included in the present study because they were either inaccessible or no drawings were

available. Standing structures receive highest priority, since many of them require

immediate attention.

The Shah Burj's structures are not included in the list, as the present Government of

Punjab Lahore Fort Project is presently doing most of the critical work - for example,

repair work on the Shish Mahal ceiling. On completion of the second phase in December

2005, the Project aims to have tackled all of the major problems. This also includes

cleaning, preventive maintenance and conservation. Because of the building's great

height, it was not possible to do preventive conservation of its northern and western faces

(comprising parts of the picture wall) in this phase. Accordingly, the Conservation

Action Priority List allocates funding for future preventive maintenance of this portion.

Conditions surveys provide information used in drawing up this list. Although based on

visual examination only, they cover all rooms and record the type and condition of

material. These are first condition reports, assessing the comparative condition of various

structures and their conservation requirements and providing the basis for targeting

future work in a systematic and prioritized way.

Figure 6.7 illustrates these priorities: level one and two priority actions are for all

structures requiring emergency work and or stabilization; level three actions are

preventive maintenance and preventive conservation; level four will be actual

conservation work.

Decisions as to what work should be carried out with available funds will be made by the

Project Implementation Team, with advice from the Technical Committee and the

approval of the Site Commission. The site conservation team will implement work, with

advice from the Technical Committee. The aim is to end the past practice of

reproductions and reconstructions. The emphasis will now be on ensuring the safety of

structures, whilst retaining their authenticity and original features.

104

Page 127: Lf Master Plan

Figure 6.7 Diagram illustrating conservation action priority

1

2

3

4

105

CONSERVATION FUNDS

PRIORITY ACTIONS

Note:

.

Emergency

Works damage to the historic property

Stabilization

Works degradation of structure

Preventive

Conservation/

Maintenance

Conservation

Works without removing original evidence.

Funding should be directed according to priority actions. Any restoration work to be

carried out should be done after extensive discussion and after all the historic

structures of the Lahore Fort have been conserved

Immediate action to stop irretrievable

To provide structural stability and further

To provide protection to vulnerable

areas of historic property

To repair and preserve the historic property

Page 128: Lf Master Plan

COS OBJECTIVE 2:

Step 1:

Step 2:

Step 3

Step 4:

Step 5:

Step 6:

Step 7:

Procedure for Undertaking Conservation Works

The Master Plan recommends the following system for conservation work at the site. The

following steps aim to ensure work is done systematically, after detailed evaluation and

discussion.

apply the documentation system developed by the HFP to other parts of the site,

as the basis for preparatory work before any conservation.

aim to ensure detailed documentation is available before any conservation

work starts. It will then be possible to do a detailed condition survey by creating

drawings of all areas of concern, along with further studies based on the original

HFP Condition Survey (a copy of which is contained in the Master Plan

annexes).

: incorporate information from the History of Intervention Dossiers; developed

by the Project Research Cell under the guidance of HFP, these are available for

most of the quads at the site.

thoroughly review scheduled conservation work, on the basis of various

studies, to see whether there needs to be any further structural evaluation. If so,

the action strategy will need amending to indicate whether this is emergency

work, stabilization, preventive conservation/preventive maintenance or

conservation.

prepare detailed drawings to show the exact nature of conservation work.

These must clearly show the present position of various elements (described in

the baseline documentation), the proposed work and the means by to retain the

original elements and ensure there is no damage to these. The site supervisor

will then use these drawings to execute the work.

ensure all work done is reversible, to safeguard all original elements. The

Technical Committee must approval the removal or changing of any elements.

All work requires full photographic documentation, both during and after its

completion. Interventions also require full graphic recording, with section

views of all areas. These 'as built' drawings will then become part of the record

in the project archives, as and when this is established.

prepare a full report on reasons for undertaking the work, the process adopted

and the work done, supported by drawings and photographs. This should be

archived.

106

Page 129: Lf Master Plan

COS OBJECTIVE 3: Full and accessible documentation of all aspects of the site

Full and systematic documentation of all aspects of a site is the basis of all conservation

planning and decision-making. The style, construction, materials and condition of all its

built elements form the baseline for assessing comparative significance, whether of

elements or buildings and historical assemblages as a whole. Understanding the status

and needs of the site, and identifying authentic elements needing to be preserved,

determines the design of the overall conservation strategy in a number of ways: in setting

priorities for conservation works, in the design of specific conservation works and in

planning future documentation and research directions.

This documentation must also meet international standards. A successful documentation

programme is already in place at the Lahore Fort, under the management of the Project

Documentation Centre (PDC). It complies with international standards, in both the work

it is doing and the way that it does this. The PDC have an on-going staff training

programme, and uses standardized recording formats to gather data entered into to a

computerized database. The HFP-designed documentation procedures used by the PDC

cover all elements of the site. This involves assigning a unique number to each recorded

element recorded and documenting this in detail. This information is available as

baseline data, in either hard-copy folios or electronically, to support conservation work.

Future custodians will therefore have access to detailed information, regardless of

whether or not the present team remains in place.

The PDC have met most second phase conservation action priorities. However, given the

scale and complexity of the picture wall, work will continue until the end of, and possibly

beyond, 2006. Works undertaken in phase two (2005-06) comprises:

remaining detailed documentation and schedules for the Shah Burj;

quadrangles;

other

miscellaneous structures;

The aim is to fully document all elements of the site. For this, the existing documentation

system will need expanding to include recording of all unexcavated, underground

archaeological elements.

detailed documentation and schedules of other structures bordering the

preliminary documentation of detached structures for example, gateways and

initiation of detailed documentation and schedules for the picture wall.

107

Page 130: Lf Master Plan

COS OBJECTIVE 4:

COS OBJECTIVE 5:

A well-equipped and committed conservation laboratory facility

One of the recommendations of the UNESCO report on

is to include a conservation laboratory as part of a proposed Pakistan Conservation

Institute. The facility would be housed within Lahore Fort and serve primarily to meet

the conservation needs of the site. This would include:

chemical treatment and analysis;

proposed new materials;

monitoring of exhibits;

To achieve these objectives, the Master Plan recommends a study to assess the present

situation, implement basic upgrading and design a phased programme of future

improvements. A chemist with experience in running an effective conservation facility

should conduct the study. It should address the issues of:

computerization;

laboratory's capacity;

laboratory

needs

Centralized and systematic storage and inventory of all artifacts

and building elements retrieved and/ or excavated from the site

Large quantities of architectural elements in various parts of the site need proper curation

and storage. These include original building elements removed in past restoration

projects, which are a valuable resource. The Master Plan proposes:

An appointed consultant, working with the PDC, should carry out this study.

Cultural Tourism in Peshawar and

Lahore14

support to the monitoring and maintenance teams, through materials analysis,

support to the conservation team, through original materials analysis and testing

support to museums in the form of artefact conservation and environmental

equipment upgrading existing equipment, prioritizing new/ additional purchases,

training in equipment use for specific conservation chemistry/ laboratory needs;

updating and expanding the library as a research resource;

designing a long-term research and expansion programme to broaden the

relocating the lab: whether the current location is satisfactory, in terms of

a systematic search of the site for material in need of curation;

a computerized inventory system to document all material for easy access;

identification of a location for a centralized storage facility.

and building preservation.

108

Page 131: Lf Master Plan

COS OBJECTIVE 6:

COS OBJECTIVE 7:

COS OBJECTIVE 8:

Reinstallation of original historical building elements

Past conservation work has focused on removing damaged portions of monuments and

completely replacing them. In the process, much authentic, original fabric ended up in

un-inventoried storage. This needs tracing, in conjunction with an initiative to create a

site repository. Where possible, elements should go back to their original position. To do

this, the Master Plan proposes that the PDC and a conservation architect do a study to

identify these elements and to assess the viability of their re-installation.

Development of a Conservation Resource Library

Establishing a first-class conservation resource library will support professional training

and the work of the PDC and conservation staff. It should contain material on

conservation theory and practice, working manuals, international guidelines and

standards, best-practice examples from around the world and relevant journals. A first

step would be to download from the web and print important documents freely issued by

the World Heritage Centre, UNESCO, ICCROM, Getty Conservation Institute, English

Heritage, US National Parks Services, Parks Canada and other organizations. UNESCO

could assist in identifying and assembling resource material needed at the site.

Training of qualified craftspeople and artisans to carry out

conservation and maintenance work in traditional materials

and methods

The master-apprentice training system in traditional building crafts and skills has broken

down in Pakistan, leading to a serious shortage of trained artisans. Traditionally,

restoration of monuments by the Department of Archaeology and the Auqaf Department

provided training for artisans. They employed many artisans, who were able to practice

their traditional skills. One of the by-products of the past policy of replacing damaged

portions of monuments with facsimiles or replicas was to provide artisans with ample

work.

Owing to a lack of money, these departments no longer employ artisans and contractors

now do work once done by them. This practice has proved detrimental to the site's

monuments because of a lack of control over the quality of work done – artisans being the

best people to check this work. Having lost the surety of sustained employment, former

artisans moved on and have not passed on their skills to the next generation. This is a lost

to both the skilled building profession and conservation at the site.

109

Page 132: Lf Master Plan

The lack of skilled, trained artisans capable of meeting the stringent requirements of

authentic conservation at the site is an obstacle. Without an adequate numbers of them, it

would not be possible to carry out the work envisaged under the project. In response,

craft workshops were set up under the Government of Punjab Project. Encouragingly, in

the short period since January 2004 they have been able to make a breakthrough in

reviving interest in historical building crafts. As the

notes:

The UNESCO Report on underscored the urgency

of reviving building crafts. The National Advisor to the Craft Workshop Project at the site

subsequently developed this idea, based on the UNESCO report's findings. Given the

importance of some of the building crafts originally used to embellish the Shah Burj

structures, training is necessary before allowing any crafts persons to work these.

The paper also highlighted the possibility of selling replica work produced by trainees.

Sale proceeds from the craft products or replicas would go into a Crafts Fund to support

the workshops after the end of the present project.

The following crafts workshops are now functioning: fresco, (stucco tracery

work) and (mirror work), pietra dura and tile mosaic. The results from the

fresco workshop, run by master artisan Ustad Saif, are most encouraging. Programmes

such as UNESCOs Seal of Excellence, which recognizes craftspeople, can support this

effort to develop workshops producing innovative design and high quality products

using traditional materials and techniques.

A resource collection of building crafts

While artisans are training, a collection of historical samples of each craft and building

technique used at the site needs to put together. Properly labelled and sourced original

samples (wherever available) and replicas of the following materials and production

techniques will serve as an important reference source. They include:

stone and marble – sculptural elements, incised carving, fretwork screens;

of

brick masonry as well as chajja formations;

Management Guidelines for World

Cultural Heritage Sites

'Guidance by trade masters is essential to ensure continuity; site workshops can promote

this. Conservation crafts persons should understand the history of technology of their craft

and be able to analyze how historic work was set out and produced.’

Cultural Tourism in Lahore and Peshawar

manabbat kari

aiyna kari

15

COS OBJECTIVE 9:

pietra dura and inlay work;

samples of fresco work;

samples of tile mosaic;

brick elements – samples from Jahangiri columns, bases and brackets composed

110

Page 133: Lf Master Plan

� samples of flooring patterns and compositions.

Gathering these items can be part of the process to collect and recording material for the

proposed repository, housing them as a sub-collection.

Support of In-house Conservation

This objective encourages the handling of conservation work by an in-house workforce,

rather than outside contractors. This is essential to meet the goal of careful conservation

to maintain the authenticity of the premises. For a long time, the Department of

Archaeology employed artisans who worked under departmental supervisors. This

allowed for working in a systematic way with required documentation, and enabled the

Department to discontinue using the Pakistan Works Department (PWD) for work at

historic sites in the 1970s. The Department of Archaeology set up its own engineering

wing, with a workforce and supervisors who trained when working on various sites

under is care. Such a system provided better supervision of work, onsite guidance and

supervision, along with a trained workforce conscious of the premises' historical value.

In the last 10 years however, the department increasingly used contractors for work it

earlier carried out itself. It is in a contractor's interest to do as much new work as possible.

Therefore, much of their work comprises producing new elements rather than

conserving the original. This has inflicted great damage on the site, with the removal of

remnants and their replacement with replicas. Even in the recent work on the basement

chambers, modern commercial paints were used in the frescos rather ones made from

original ingredients.

Unless it is work of a specialized nature, such as the new steel structure above the Shish

Mahal ceiling, it is important that the department staff carry out all conservation work.

For this purpose trained artisans and workers should be employed on a regular basis, so

that that they can develop the necessary 'duty of care' outlook when working on historic

premises. This proven method ensures that only those who are trained and skilled in

various conservation-related trades carry out work. It also allows continued evaluation

as work progresses and helps in the protection and reuse of historic remnants.

Accordingly, the department needs to strengthen its in-house capacity for conservation

work if it is to maintain the authenticity of site.

A specialist report,

, contains a detailed review of the existing monitoring

and maintenance situation at the site, and the factors contributing to its

COS OBJECTIVE 10:

6.4 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS

6.4.1 Overall Strategy

Management and Monitoring Systems for Conservation and

Preservation of Lahore Fort

111

Page 134: Lf Master Plan

deteriorating condition (Annexure 2). At present, there is no programme for

regularly and systematically monitoring and maintaining the condition of

buildings and spaces at the site; to ensure that they do not deteriorate to the point

that their integrity and significance is compromised. There is also no system to

monitor the implementation of conservation work and ensure that this complies

with specifications and set standards of intervention. Procedures exist only for

monitoring work carried out in line with approved Master Plans and

development schemes.

In response, the Master Plan proposes putting in place a monitoring and

preventive maintenance programme. By systematically reviewing building

conditions, it would identify emergency and long-term maintenance and

conservation needs. Recommendations are also made for the supervision and

monitoring of conservation works, to ensure that they are done to the highest

standards.

The Master Plan recommends that a core monitoring team, comprising a conservation

architect, conservation engineer and chemist, work under the supervision of the Project

Implementation Team.

They will carry out systematic weekly and monthly inspections, assessing all buildings

and parts of the site. In this way, all buildings receive equal attention and problems do go

unnoticed.

Routine monitoring will focus on all major elements of each building or structure,

including:

Figure 6.8 illustrates some of the general elements needing regular inspection in all

buildings.

: Systematic monitoring of the fabric of historical buildings and the

condition of Lahore Fort

6.4.2 Monitoring and maintenance (MM) objectives

MM OBJECTIVE 1

roofs;

masonry, walls and foundations;

cracks;

storm water drainage;

moisture/humidity;

floors and staircases;

internal finishes;

drainage systems;

ruins.

112

Page 135: Lf Master Plan

REGULAR MONITORING INSPECTIONS

Roofs Roof Joints: Roof Deflection Cracks Roof Finish Drains, Gutters

Foundations Settlements Moisture movement

Cracks Age of Cracks New Cracks Glass telltales Micrometer

Storm Water Revival of old Drainage Rain water Inspection during and after rains

Moisture, Humidity Height of Dampness In Winter and Summer

Floors, Staircases Fungus in Timber Stairs and Floors Excessive Wear and Tear

Internal Finishes Detached Plaster Frescoes Dust and Dirt Water Seepage Vandalism

Drain System Test with bucket of water or Emission Test or Pneumatic or Electro

Magnetic

Ruins Plant Growth Loose coat of Plaster

Masonry Walls All cracks Lateral Displacement Bulges

Figure 6.8 Diagram showing monitoring needs

113

By using monitoring checklists developed for each building and structure, it is possible to

systematically assess the condition of all these elements. The Master Plan recommends

appointing an architectural consultant as soon as possible to design these. Each one will

include building-specific critical structural and decorative elements that require special

attention in maintaining its soundness and authenticity. The checklist will provide

indicators to measure change or deterioration in an element's condition. Changes in these

will then alert the Project Implementation Team to take the necessary action.

By investing in monitoring equipment – thermographs, humidigraphs and vibration

meters – telltale symptoms will be detected. These will augment the systematic

monitoring process.

Data gathered will form a baseline against which to monitor and measure change and

deterioration in building condition, and inform decisions about maintenance work

Page 136: Lf Master Plan

SITE COMMISSION

Monitoring Team

Punjab Archaeology Department

Technical Committee Site Management Group

: *Conservation Architect,Conservation Engineer,Archaeological Chemist Archaeological Conservator

* Specialist input as required

Maintenance Team: *Conservation Architect,Conservation Engineer,

Figure 6.9 Monitoring and maintenance teams' structure

114

needed. Specific recommendations would go to the Site Management Group. If

approved, work done by the maintenance team would need certifying on completion by

the monitoring team. This establishes a system of cross-checking of work and

confirmation of standards. Figure 6.9 illustrates the relationship between the two teams

and the site's administration.

MM OBJECTIVE 2: A programme of regular site maintenance

The states that:

'The maintenance programme is aimed at keeping the cultural resources in a

manner that will prevent the loss of any part of them. It concerns all practical

and technical measures that should be taken to maintain the site in proper

order. It is a continuous process, not a product.'

The objective of a maintenance programme is to preserve inherent values of an historical

property; safeguarding the authenticity and integrity of structures and site whilst also

preventing deterioration of the historical fabric. As the

also points out:'Prevention is the highest form of conservation. If causes of decay can be

removed, or at least reduced, something worthwhile has been achieved.'

The proposed maintenance programme links in with routine monitoring of the site.

Decorative and structural problems identified on monitoring checklists go to the

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites

Management Guidelines for World

Cultural Heritage Sites

16

17

Page 137: Lf Master Plan

115

maintenance team, comprising a conservation architect, conservation engineer, an

archaeological conservator and their respective assistants. This team will work alongside

the monitoring team, under the supervision of the Site Management Group and Technical

Committee (Figure 6.9).

Both teams will discuss detailed specifications and procedures for doing the work, with

advice from the Technical Committee and site conservation architect. If specialist input is

required, the Committee can call in experts on an 'as needed' basis.

When agreed maintenance work is completed, a full report will go to the Site

Management Group. The monitoring team will review this and the work itself, certifying

it as complete and up to standard. If there are any issues or disagreements, the Technical

Committee will assist in resolving them.

Figure 6.10 shows the steps required to set up and run the system for monitoring site

condition, and planning and implementing maintenance action.

Monitoring Teamconfirms maintenancework

Maintenance Teamreports of work done

INITIAL TASKS: Initial Inspection Report

PROGRAMME:

Identification of MaintenancePriorities

Implementation of MaintenanceWork

to identifycritical monitoring issues: ConsultingConservation Architect

TechnicalCommittee

on Checklists and identify new ones;data recorded on building specificforms: Monitoring Team

: Monitoring Team +Maintenance Team + ConservationTeam + Technical Committee

: Maintenance Team

Monitoring Checklists

ONGOING Regular Monitoring

: ConsultingConservation Architect +

to assess issues

Figure 6.10. Setting up and implementation of the monitoring and maintenance programme

Page 138: Lf Master Plan

MM OBJECTIVE 3:

MM OBJECTIVE 4:

a. Preservation of exposed building remains and foundations

b. Monitoring of site work involving excavation

A system of monitoring conservation work carried out by the

department or under their supervision

Monitoring and inspecting conservation work will be a standard procedure for the site's

conservation team. Monitoring and maintenance teams will jointly supervise and

continuously check all ongoing conservation work. This includes studies of specific

conservation situations to design the best means of working, preparing surfaces and

materials before work starts and writing detailed specifications. It is also essential that

skilled conservators or contractors with sound knowledge of conservation doing the

work complete full reports on its completion.

Protection of archaeological resources

Archaeological resources at Lahore Fort consist of areas of ruins and exposed building

foundations which, 'because of their lost physical integrity, are subject to particular

problems of decay and therefore merit special treatment and care ' The site's

archaeological remains are subject to damage by pedestrian traffic and exposure to the

elements. There are also open areas, presently covered with recent soil deposits or under

hard surfaces or sealed areas adjacent to standing historical structures, which could be

exposed during conservation work. In all cases, important information lies sealed below

the surface of the site. This could be lost unless a comprehensive approach for

safeguarding remains and presenting these to the public is in place. It needs to deal

with the following issues.

All areas of archaeological remains should be superficially cleared, mapped and

their condition assessed. The maintenance team should clear these with the

supervision of an archaeologist. The PDC, with the supervision of an archaeologist,

should carry out mapping and recording. The site's conservation team and an

archaeologist will need to assess their condition and advise on any action.

istorical integrity. Any material added must be compatible and reversible, and

the work done under the supervision of the site conservation architect and an

archaeologist.

with

fragile ruins, as unrestricted walking and climbing on these causes damage.

All work involving excavation in archaeologically sensitive areas of the site must be

prohibited unless necessary. Figure 6.11 shows these areas. This includes

.

in situ

18

After mapping and recording, fragile remains should be recovered with a layer of

soil or gravel.

Exposed remains may need combining with other material to preserve its

h

Routing visitor traffic away from ground level remains and closing off areas

116

Page 139: Lf Master Plan

maintenance excavations, conservation of historical buildings, garden digging,

access to drains and cables or other work.

Any work penetrating more than 25 cm below the surface in these areas must be

subject to an archaeological monitoring programme. Archaeological monitoring,

sometimes referred to as a watching brief, will not stop work or substantially delay it;

the aim is to ensure the retrieval and recording of any archaeological finds and

information revealed.

The Master Plan recommends designing an Archaeological Monitoring Programme,

including a manual or SOP, all necessary pro formas, registers and a programme for

processing material and data recovered during monitoring.An archaeologist trained in the monitoring system must supervise the monitoring, or

watching brief. Staff training will therefore also need to be part of the Programme.

The programme to protect archaeological remains below ground should follow the

three-fold approach presented below in Figure 6.12. During emergency management

of exposed areas, research and planning should also begin on devising a long-term

archaeological research plan. At the same time, monitoring procedures need

designing and putting in place at the site.

117

Fig. 6.11 Map showing the areas of exposed archaeological remains and of archaeological potential

LEGEND.TOURIST FACILITIESINCLUDING TOILET

SOUVENIR SHOP AND

SNACKS

GA

TE

GA

TE

GA

TE

GA

TE

GATE

GATE

GATE

GATE

GATE

GATE

GA

TE

GA

TE

OP

NIN

G

226.108

CU

RB

ST

ON

E

TOILETBOUR HOLL

T.W

T.W

SUI GASMATERSUIG

ASPIPE

ROOM

T.W

MOSQUE & MAZAR

W.T

DATE TREE

DATE TREE

PIPE 3" %%CSUIGAS

E.P TOWER

SINE BOARD

BATH

T.W

FOUNDATION

TRANSFORMER

ROO

M

RO

OM

DRAIN

LA

WN

G.I PIPE

OP

EN

DR

AIN

UP

DOOR

COVEREDDRAIN

DO

OR

UP

DR

AIN

WELLSOLIN

G

POLE

FENCE

GRASSY

WELL

OLD

FOUNTAIN

FOUNTAIN

OLD WELL

G.I PIPE %%C 1 1/2"

G.I PIPE

G.I PIPE %%C 1 1/2"

S.V

OPINING

FOUNTAIN

PLANTERPLANTER

DOOR

HOLL

DOOR

DOOR

drain

DRINKINGWATERTANK

M.S PIPE %%C 3"

M.S PIPE %%C 3"

FOUNTAINDOOR

M.S PIPE %%C 3"

A/C

DOOR

OP

EN

DR

AIN

OPEN DRAIN

S.V

S.V

S.V

S.V

S.V

S.V

S.V

S.V

S.V

S.V

FOUNTAIN

FOUNTAIN

TBM#4

RA

INW

ET

ER

DR

AIN

RA

INW

ET

ER

DR

AIN

RA

INW

ET

ER

DR

AIN

RA

INW

ET

ER

DR

AIN

DOOR

S.V

S.V

S.V

S.V

S.V

S.V

THOOP

S.V

S.V

THOOP

O.H.R

S.V

DRAIN

DRAIN

DRAIN

DRAIN

G.I PIPE

G.I PIPE %%C 1 1/2"

RA

INW

ET

ER

DR

AIN

RA

INW

ET

ER

DR

AIN

STAIR

STAIR

RA

INW

ET

ER

DR

AIN

S.V

S.V

TAP

S.V

S.V

DOOR

T.W

RA

INW

ET

ER

DR

AIN

RA

INW

ET

ER

DR

AIN

RA

INW

ET

ER

DR

AIN

RA

INW

ET

ER

DR

AIN

RA

INW

ET

ER

DR

AIN

RA

INW

ET

ER

DR

AIN

T.W

RA

INW

ET

ER

DR

AIN

M.S RAINWETER PIPE

OLD WELL

RO

OM

STORE

GA

S

GAS PIPE

GAS PIPE

OLD

DN

MOSQUE

TAP

TOILET

TOILET

STORE

S.V

S.V

WELL

LAWN

DRAIN

DRAIN DR

AIN

DR

AIN

DRA

IN

MOSQUEDOOR

S.V

S.V

GATE

PIPE

PIP

E

TW

OF

FIC

E

OFFICE

LAB

HOSTEL

PL

AN

TE

R

PL

AN

TE

R

PARKING

PARK

RO

OM

DOOR

SUI GAS PIPE

BUILDING

MOSQUE

RE

MP

TAP

STAIR

PIPE

OPEN

HAMA-E-SHAHI

ROYAL KITCHENS

DOOR

TAP

TOILET

PLANTER

GR

EE

NB

EL

T

GR

EE

NB

EL

T

FO

UN

TA

IN

GREEN BELTFOUNTAIN

FO

UN

TA

IN

GREEN BELT

GREEN BELT

FOUNTAIN

GREEN BELT

GATE

DATE TREE

THE SAMADHI OF

RANJIT SINGH

DOOR

DOOR

DOOR

GATE

T.W

SOLING TRACK

BU

ILD

ING

LIN

E

STREET

STREET

ENCROACHMENT

ST

RE

ET

WAPDA GRID STATION

LAWN

LAWN

LAWN

LAWNLAWN

LAWN

LAWN

LAWN LAWN

LAWN

LAWN

LAWNLAWN

LAWN

LAWN

MAZAR SHER SHAH WALI

STREET

PL

AN

TE

R

PLANTER

BASEMENT

SLABROOF

PL

AN

TE

R

ST

RE

ET

BUILDING

A L I P A R K

PSOPETROL

PUMP

SHELL

PETROLPUM

P

ALAMGIRIGATE

HA

TH

IPA

ER

PLANTER

PLANTER

NAULKAHA

SHISH MAHAL

BURJ

KALA

BURJ

LAL ARAZGAHDIWAN-E-KHAS

KHAWABGAH-E-JAHANGIR

ARMY CAMP

KHILVATKHANA

QUADRANGLE

JAHANGIR

DALAN-E-SANGE-E-SURKH

HAMAM

DAULAT KHANA-E-

KHAS-O-AM OFAKBAR

SURVENT

MASJIDI GATE

MUSAMMANBURJ GATE MOTI MASJID

KHANA

DIWAN-E-AAM

EASTERN

SOUTH EASTBASTION

STEPS & TERRACES

PIATR

GATE

SHAH BURJ

TEMPLE

OF LAU

BAROOD

PIPE

GURUDAWARA

ATTIQUE STADIUM

HA

ZO

OR

IB

AG

H

%%C 1 1/2"

L A W N

L A W N

L A W N

L A W N

L A W NL A W N

L A W N

L A W N

L A W N

L A W N

FOUNTAIN

THOOP

ENCROACHMENT

RIM MARKET

EN

CR

OA

CH

ME

NT

TOMB

ALLAMA

LADIES MOSQUE

DN

POSTERNRESIDENCES

RESIDENCES

ROSHNAI

GATE

SOUTH WESTBASTION

WA

LK

ING

ST

RE

ET

FORT ROAD

FORT ROAD

CHILDERN PARK

RESTHOUSE

S O L I N G

FOUNDATION

WESTERN

EA

ST

ER

ND

AL

AN

PLOT

FO

RT

RO

AD

OLD

KHANA

KATCHA TRACK

WELL

OLD

S.V

DN

BUILDING FOUNDATION

MAKATIB

ASP

HA

LTR

OA

D

GATE

DOOR

SOLING LAWN LAWN

LAWN LAWN

SOLINGSOLING

SOLING

SOLING

SOLING

SOLING

SOLING

SOLING

SOLING

SOLING

SOLING

SOLING

SOLING

RCC FLOOR

SOLING

SOLING

SOLING

SOLING

SOLINGSOLING

SOLING

SOLINGL A W N

L A W N

L A W N

L A W NL A W N

RIM MARKET

SAMADH/ TEMPLE OF

BHAI VASTI RAM

CITY GOVT

MAINTAINED PARK

GRAND TRUNK ROAD

NURSERY

QUARTERS

WELL

DALAN

IQBAL

AUQAF OFFICE BUILDING

WALL

EXISTINGHOUSE

EXISTINGHOUSE

EXISTINGHOUSE

KHARAK SINGHHAVELI

ASP

HA

LTR

OA

D

S.V

BU

SH

ES

S.V

PLANTER

FOUNTAIN

FOUNTAIN

217.823

I Q B A L P A R K

S.V

CAR PARKING

FOR 200 CARS

CAR PARKINGFOR 120 CARS

ENTRY FROM

MASTI GATEEXIT FROM

BRITISH GATE

ENTRY FROM

PR

OP

OS

ED

CA

RPA

RK

ING

GATE

EXIT FROM

(LONG TERM)

SEPTIC TANK

I Q B A L P A R K

BADSHAHI

MOSQUE

LAWN

LAWN

LAWN

LAWNFOUNTAIN

SOLING

FOUNTAIN

FOUNTAIN

FO

UN

TA

ING

RE

EN

BE

LT

GR

EE

NB

EL

T

LAWN

Page 140: Lf Master Plan

ResearchIdentification of areas of exposed archaeologicalremains and of underground potential

Emergency Programme:

� Clearance of areas ofarchaeologicalremains

Add to MonitoringProgramme

Mapping of remainsAssessment ofpreservation needsImplementation ofconsolidation orprotection measures

ArchaeologicalMonitoring of Worksin areas of potential:

Consultant studyto designmonitoringproceduresImplementationof “watchingbrief” whenrequired

ArchaeologicalInvestigations:

Consultant study toplan archaeologicalinvestigationprogrammeGeophysical TestingExcavations with a“History in Action”programmePost-excavationprocessing andanalysisReport andpublication

Figure 6.12 Long term protection of below ground archaeological resources

MM OBJECTIVE 5: Initiation of an expanded cleaning maintenance programme

for the site

Cleaning of marble surfaces has begun, under the supervision of the Assistant Chemist

and his staff. This follows experiments, in 2003, to establish a correct cleaning procedure.

After looking at various ways, and because Sepiolite is not available in Pakistan, it was

decided to use mild detergent and clean water. This has proved effective – cleaning the

marble surface without making too white, and enabling it to blend in with other adjacent

material. The most difficult areas to clean have been the intricate fretwork screens,

consisting of miniscule hexagonal patterns.

Given the huge scale of the operation to clean the Shah Burj and the rest of the citadel, the

project created a cleaning brigade of low-income women from the staff colony. This has

proved extremely successful, due to the women's determined effort. Equipped with

brushes, masks and caps, they are systematically removing decades of grime from the

site's marble and brick. This initiative should cover all areas of the site, and continue on a

long-term basis to maintain standards of cleanliness.

118

Page 141: Lf Master Plan

Specialist advice is required on the best and safest methods to clean the monument's

fragile elements like frescos, delicate plaster mouldings and tile mosaic work. General

cleaning or non-specialist laboratory staff cannot do this, as it is highly skilled work.

The Master Plan requests UNESCO to assist in bringing in specialists and organizations

with experience in conserving Mughal art to work at the site.

Review of the planting programme

The conservation team needs to work closely with senior garden staff in identifying areas

where plant watering is affecting buildings. Where this is a problem, the solution is to

remove and relocate plants further away from the affected building. The Dalans (cells), on

the perimeter of the Maidan-e-Diwan-Aam are a case in point. Relocating plants caused

no loss to the integrity of the gardens, as the planting did not follow the original Mughal

layout.

Damage of this kind to historical fabric is reported to or picked up by the monitoring

team. They then consult the conservation team. The maintenance team will then do any

remedial work.

The purpose of a research framework is to promote and support wide-ranging research

and make best use of all opportunities to extend knowledge and understanding. A

research framework document will therefore need to signpost a wide range of issues and

topics for anyone interested in researching the site.

The site's research framework must:

assess the state of existing knowledge and clearly identify gaps which need

filling;

highlight those baseline research topics essential to developing further

enquiry;

disseminate the framework's principles among academic and research

institutions to

MM OBJECTIVE 6:

6.5 RESEARCH FRAMEWORK

6.5.1 Overall Strategy

stimulate scholarly and specialist research.

119

Page 142: Lf Master Plan

6.5.2 Research Framework (REF) Objectives

REF OBJECTIVE 1: Mechanisms to support a wide ranging research programme

at Lahore Fort

A research cell exists as part of the revitalized PCI. It will carry out the following work.

a) Design a research framework with the following objectives:

understanding historical processes at the site, shown in the chronological

development of the building plan, design, decoration and use;

creating

the garden landscape in the Muslim world;

evolution;

with the walled city;

and use;

authentic conservation and management.

Table 6.3 presents broad areas of research focus and examples of specific research topics.

b) The Research Cell will also:

students

doing research;

material for projects at the site;

Pakistan

understanding the use and meaning of space, water and vegetation, in

understanding the manipulation of the landscape in the site's creation and

understanding the changing physical and metaphorical relationship of the

Lahore Fort

understanding the site in the wider context of Mughal fort design, construction

providing and using information as an aid to the site's effective interpretation,

manage the acquisition of archival material;

manage any allowances paid from the Research and Publication Fund to

arrange library exchanges, internationally and nationally, for relevant research

publicize the Research Cell's agenda throughout the academic community in

and abroad to attract students, scholars and researchers.

The also recommends that a

Research Coordination Committee be set up. This would advise on and organize long-

term programmes, involving a succession of researchers, or short-term programmes for

individuals. It would also set goals, establish work plans and schedules and review

progress. At present, research at Lahore Fort is almost non-existent and without funding.

However, at this point a committee structure would not be appropriate for the Research

Cell, as it would be potentially restrictive. The firm recommendation, also given in the

that 'close liaison be maintained

with universities and other facilities interested in the cultural resources' receives full

support.

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites

19

120

Page 143: Lf Master Plan

Site Studies:

— the functions of Structures and areas;

Chronological development of the plan

and function of parts of the Qila

— Building sequences and architectural

phases

— Stylistic analysis of structural and

decorative elements

— Study of Mughal hydraulic system

through archaeological methods

— Historical studies of persons and events

— Study of miniature paintings and other

artistic sources

— Compilation of references to Lahore

Fort in Persian manuscripts and other

early works

— Compilation of Royal Asiatic Society

references and other learned journals

— The changing relationship of Lahore

Fort to the Walled City

— Study of exhibits in the site museums

— Cataloguing and study of structural

fragments in storage around the site

Landscape Studies:

Regional Studies:

Technical Studies:

— Study of Ravi River relationship to

the site over time

— Flora / botanical studies

— Stratigraphic studies of the site

modification

— Chemical soil mapping

— geophysical examination of the site

— Understanding of the site within the

context of Mughal South and central

Asia

— Compilation of a Research

Bibliography of Mughal studies

— Materials analysis

— Study of specific conservation

methods

— Scientific dating of structural and

excavated materials

— Soil, hydrology, micro-climates etc.

Table 6.3 Research Framework: types of studies that would contribute to the research base

REF OBJECTIVE 2: A Lahore Fort publication programme

Now well established, the Research Cell needs to begin publishing; initially, about work

done. This can then subsequently expand to include publication of past and on-going

research, adding to the body of knowledge about the site.

Developing a publication programme is a priority. This would need to detail the kinds of

publications the Cell aims to produce (pamphlets, books, leaflets, guides). It would also

need to include a publishing schedule and cost breakdowns, define contributor

responsibilities and serve as a plan for the short and medium-term. A properly

developed programme will be very important in attracting contributions from national

and overseas sources to the Research and Publication Fund.

121

Page 144: Lf Master Plan

REF OBJECTIVE 3: Programme of archaeological research and investigations

A much-needed programme of archaeological investigation will provide evidence

clarifying the plan and date of buildings, building phases and the relationships between

various parts of the site. Techniques used in garden archaeology can also help to trace the

changing plan of the Mughal gardens, planting schemes, built features and hydraulic

systems. This would create an integrated picture of change through the centuries.

The specific objectives of the proposed archaeological programme are:

to clarify the plan, identity and date of built remains, where knowledge is presently

only partial, fragmentary or anecdotal (i.e. known only through literary or artistic

references);

architectural phases of known structures;

and the chambers around the Maidan;

view to

restoring original schemes;

restoring original designs to working order;

increase

community interest in its conservation.

The programme will involve:

particular risk;

research;

high

potential, particularly evidence of the hydraulics system;

On-going archaeological excavation also provides an educational opportunity for

student and community involvement 'in the field'. If properly managed, it also provides

an opportunity for inspiring a public interest in 'history in action'.

Figure 6.11 shows recommended areas for archaeological investigation. A consultant

archaeologist, in conjunction with archaeologists of the department, now needs to

prepare a detailed proposal for archaeological research and investigation at the site.

Detailing aims and areas for investigation, field and post excavation methodology,

to resolve questions concerning building sequence and relationships between

to define the pattern and layout of the original gardens in the historic quadrangles

to identify the species of plants used in Mughal period garden schemes, with a

to understand define Mughal period hydraulics and water features with a view to

to develop local awareness of the historical depth and richness of site and to

initial research to identify areas of the site with high archaeological potential or at

creating a GIS database to manage information generated by archaeological

a non-intrusive geophysical survey to identify sub-surface features and areas of

soil sampling and chemical mapping;

excavating selected areas of high archaeological interest;

post-excavation processing and analysis of data and finds.

122

Page 145: Lf Master Plan

staffing, schedule and costs, this will be an important part of the overall strategy for

preserving the underground archaeological resources discussed in MM Objective 4b.

ResearchIdentification of areas of exposed archaeologicalremains and of underground potential

Emergency Programme:

� Clearance of areas ofarchaeologicalremains

Add to MonitoringProgramme

Mapping of remainsAssessment ofpreservation needsImplementation ofconsolidation orprotection measures

ArchaeologicalMonitoring of Worksin areas of potential:

Consultant studyto designmonitoringproceduresImplementationof “watchingbrief” whenrequired

ArchaeologicalInvestigations:

Consultant study toplan archaeologicalinvestigationprogrammeGeophysical TestingExcavations with a“History in Action”programmePost-excavationprocessing andanalysisReport andpublication

Figure 6.12 Long term protection of below ground archaeological resources

Upgrading of the library

There are plans to relocate the library to Hazuri Bagh. Regardless of whether this

happens, there needs to be fundamental improvements to bring it up to standard. The

library particularly needs to safeguard the collection and to make it easier for scholars to

conduct research. In the first instance, it should become a reference library with all books

remaining in the Library. All rare material needs to be under lock and key, with copies for

reference.

One of the main aims of the Research Framework is to encourage and support scholars to

do research and use the library. For this to happen, library facilities need upgrading in the

following ways.

provision of computers for use by scholars;

REF OBJECTIVE 4:

provision of Internet connectivity for scholarly web browsing and searching;�

123

Page 146: Lf Master Plan

provision of a photocopying machine and flatbed scanner;

better shelving for books;

tables and chairs for researchers and staff;

a stationery allocation;

better lighting and electrical outlets.

the Senior Librarian;

a representative of the Northern Circle, Federal Department of Archaeology;

a representative of the Research Cell;

a representative from the Friends of Lahore Fort.

appoint an archivist specializing in paper and photographic storage;

create a separate archival section in the PDC or Library;

properly catalogue all archival material;

store it in special acid-free enclosures in acid-free boxes;

create photograph prints of all glass slides and fragile or important negatives;

digitize and scan all material for ease of use.

A Library Committee would be responsible for advancing these improvements and

seeking urgently needed funding. It would comprise:

Programme for collection, storage and inventory of archival

material

Archival material at the site consists of maps, drawings and photographs. Many maps

and drawings date from late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and are the only

record of its kind in Pakistan. Consisting of both glass slides and negatives, this

photographic material provides invaluable evidence about the past condition of the site.

Given the fragility and importance of this material, it is important to fully catalogue and

then store it in an acid-free environment. Glass slides, many badly damaged, need

printing, with photographic copies arranged for easy access by researchers. Overall, the

record is an extremely important source for research.

Developing a proper environment for storing and curating archival material is a priority.

If this is to happen, there is an urgent need to:

Part of the Master Plan study involved developing a detailed, long-term proposal for

presenting and using Lahore Fort whilst maintaining, protecting and enhancing its

historical and cultural authenticity. The full report is in Annex 3. The overall aim of the

REF OBJECTIVE 5:

6.6 VISITATION POLICY

124

Page 147: Lf Master Plan

visitation plan is 'to enhance visitor understanding and appreciation of the site and its

heritage values, while at the same time safeguarding it from inappropriate exploitation.'

As is widely accepted, cultural tourism can provide benefits; to a country's economy and,

in the case of Pakistan, by helping promote a 'soft' cultural image. If properly briefed,

visitor to the Lahore Fort can act as individual 'cultural ambassadors'. However,

converting the ordinary visitor into a cultural emissary is going to require a great deal of

effortnot least, in provide them with authentic and interesting information, attractively

presented in a variety of media. A key aim of the Visitation Policy is to bring Lahore Fort

to life and by explaining its past, give it new meaning in the present.

The Policy's overall strategy includes:

making Lahore Fort accessible and enjoyable for a broad spectrum of people;

activities and events.

An Emergency Protection Plan to control visitor access and

close fragile areas

Proposals for the use of different parts of the site use the following designations.

tructures and garden areas. In these areas, there is a focus on display and

educational facilities. There are rest areas, but no provision of food or service facilities

(maximum restrictions on permitted usage).

interventions outside the HCRA, the lawns around the Akbari gate and northeastern

area of the site. Visitor facilities, offices, the proposed craft centre and picnic areas are

in this zone (defined but more relaxed restriction).

Fortification Walls and the British period steps. The Plan proposes development of

these zones for visitor facilities, recreation and performances (widest usage within

defined limits).

20

6.6.1 Overall Strategy

6.6.2 Visitation Policy (VIP) Objectives

ensuring that events and activities are of a high quality;

preventing or minimizing negative impacts on the site;

developing a public commitment to the site;

maximizing income-generation by use of the site as a venue for authorized

public

High Cultural Resource Areas (HCRA), comprising the main Mughal quadrangles,

s

Middle Cultural Resource Areas (MCRA), primarily comprising British period

Recreational Zones (RZ), consisting of the Maidan, the lawn between the Northern

VIP OBJECTIVE 1:

125

Page 148: Lf Master Plan

These designated areas contain some structures and areas strong enough to withstand

frequent visitation; others are too fragile for public access. A detailed review has been

made of fragility levels for each structure within these zones. This also factored in special

features, general conditions and potential interest for the general visitor. Based on the

review, an index of building robustness divides buildings and areas into categories and

specifies visitor levels. They are:

This index is in now in use. Recommendations for acceptable types and levels of use for

individual buildings, structures and open spaces are in Annexure 3.

The next step is to confirm which very fragile areas of the site visitor misuse and the

pressure of numbers are damaging. The PDC could do this, basing their survey on

findings in Condition Survey Catalogue and Table 9 in Annexure 3 (Fragile structures

and elements). It will then be possible to design and implement measures to immediately

prevent access to these areas, using direct and indirect methods for controlling visitor

movement.

Direct means include:

Closure of the Naulakha Pavilion and the Shish Mahal has set the precedent for this type

of restricted access.

Indirect means include:

very robust resources, which can be open to all visitors;

less robust resources that can be open, but with controlled access.

fragile resources that can tolerate only limited or restricted access.

very fragile resources, only accessible to researchers and special interest groups.

immediate closure of areas identified as being at extreme risk, ensuring that public

access is impossible;

a system of soft and hard barriers to divert visitors away from sensitive areas and off

delicate paving, making them viewable from a distance only;

redirecting visitor traffic into other areas by use of signs and paths to guide visitors to

other less-frequented areas, such as the picture wall, which can be viewed safely from

a distance.

increasing the numbers of guards and redeploying them to the areas identified as

most at risk from visitor misuse;

boosting the number of guards, by implementing a student volunteer programme as

a priority;

126

Page 149: Lf Master Plan

arranging special activities during public holidays to encourage to crowds to disperse

to other less frequented areas of the site — activities of this type could include staging

theatrical events on the British-era steps, and opening the ramparts as a viewing

platform.

The 'carrying capacity' concept addresses this question of how many people can visit a

site at any given time without the risk of degrading it and the visitors' experience of it.

Clearly, the overall numbers of visitors to Lahore Fort are often unacceptably high and

visitor numbers are causing damage to particularly vulnerable areas. However, the idea

of limiting the numbers of visitors to the site is contrary to its standing as a national

monument and a World Heritage site. The logistics of limiting access would also be

difficult.

The standard approach to these issues is to apply limits of acceptable change. This is

based on the principle that rather than trying to limit numbers of visitors, heritage

managers must decide how much impact and change is acceptable in a site's various

zones and find ways of making sure these limits are not exceeded. The process includes an

inventory of existing conditions to provide baseline data for identifying indicators to

measure the impacts of tourism and the nature and extent of changes.

The Master Plan recommends that a consultant conduct a carrying capacity study of the

site, in terms of limits of acceptable change principles. Its findings can then help

determine visitor route planning, zone use, decisions to close fragile areas and

deployment of guards.

In the long term, the main entry into the site should be from the east, through the Akbari

gate. The main exit will be through the Alamgiri gate and Postern gate, leading to the

Hazuri Bagh area and beyond. Routes defined within the citadel open up as much of the

site as possible to visitors, whilst considering overall robustness of buildings and spaces

and visitor safety issues. Fig. 6.13 presents the schematic plan for visitation to all parts of

the site and proposed route alternatives.

127

Page 150: Lf Master Plan

Fig. 6.13 Map Showing Visitors' Facilities and Routes

128

Page 151: Lf Master Plan

VIP OBJECTIVE 2: An integrated interpretative policy based on sound research

The long-term Visitation Plan proposes a system of visitor facilities housed in adapted

historical buildings. These would include a visitor centre near the eastern entrance to the

site and two small sub-centres; one in the Postern gate barracks, the other near the British-

era steps. The ground floor of Kharrak Singh Haveli would become an interpretive

gallery, the former British garages an information centre in and the to-be-conserved

imperial kitchens a craft centre (see Figure 6.13). The plan proposes creating a centre for

childrens' activities in the Barood Khana. The proposed facilities need augmenting

through a comprehensive policy for site interpretation, design of site furniture, signage,

interpretive and promotional material and a system of tour guides.

The Master Plan recommends that a Site Interpretation Study develop this policy of

integrated interpretation for presenting the site to visitors. The Project Documentation

Centre, in conjunction with the proposed Research Cell and the Site Commission, can

generate the information needed to interpret the site.

Interpretation of the Lahore Fort World Heritage Site for the public must:

a. be based on factual and reliable information;

b. generate 'themes' or stories explaining the significance of the site to the community,

particularly students and young people;

c. be transformed into a wide range of media, including: signage, web sites, booklets,

brochures, audio-visual and guide packs;

d. be consistent and follow well-thought-out themes or topics providing an interesting

and multi-faceted picture of the site;

e. be planned, designed and located in line with international standards for site

interpretation.

The Study needs to provide:

an overall, detailed policy for enabling visitors to interpret Lahore Fort, employing a

wide range of media and approaches;

and

significance and its meaning to Lahore, Pakistan and the world community;

— range and types of signage;

details of the 'themes' that will tell rich and varied stories about the site, its history

plans for implementing the policy, including:

— location of signage;

— a brief for a design competition;

— content and text for a range of printed material and CDs;

— setting up the interpretive gallery.

129

Page 152: Lf Master Plan

Developing designs for signage, printed material and other media could happen in one of

two ways: through a consultancy, or by through a competition among tertiary art colleges

and other institutions. The outcome would be designs for a basic colour scheme, motifs

and logos to apply to all forms of interpretive material generated by the Centre.

In the short term, stopgap measures can improve display at the site. These could include:

temporary general information and map boards; pamphlets explaining the historical

background and significance of the site; display boards about the crafts workshops, the

cleaning brigade and the conservation work being carried out at the Shish Mahal.

Upgrading of the Museums

The museum at Lahore Fort is a wasted resource. A minimal investment in time, effort

and money could upgrade it to a standard where it provides an informative and enjoyable

visitor experience. A museum upgrade package would comprise:

carrying out a research project on artefacts and exhibits, and the historical contexts

and periods they represent;

and

highlight exhibits;

regular cleaning programme thereafter;

conservation staff to ensure sympathetic treatment of historic interiors;

galleries to visitors and to give meaning to their visit; where there are no panels put

new ones up;

and safe display of fragile paper exhibits.

The Master Plan recommends that a consultant co-ordinate this work, overseeing its

implementation by Lahore Fort staff formed into a Museums Action Group. This would

comprise members of the Research Cell, PDC, maintenance and cleaning staff and

. They should also think about relocating the museum to another area at the

site, and identify a building that could support specialist exhibits.

VIP OBJECTIVE 3:

reviewing and updating acquisitions and inventory procedures;

preparing a basic brochure providing an introduction to the museum - its scope

looking at alternative display cases;

having the museum galleries completely and thoroughly cleaned - and instituting a

painting the display space to brighten it up; this must be done on the advice of

where display panels exist, put up text and illustrations to explain the content of the

seeking expert advice on whether special facilities are needed for the conservation

Friends

of Lahore Fort

130

Page 153: Lf Master Plan

VIP OBJECTIVE 4: To draw the community of Lahore into all aspects of Lahore

Fort's present and future safeguarding

Until recently, the local community in Lahore has had no role in caring and planning for

the site. As described in Section 3.5.7, this has changed for the better because of a number

of Karavan-style initiatives designed to actively involve youth and women. At present,

the PDC is acting as a proxy Karavan-style office. Because of the success of recent heritage

awareness events, staged in conjunction with Karavan Pakistan, and a vocal and visible

expression of interest from the local community, a dedicated officer is now running a

Community and Youth Outreach Cell at the site.

The Karavan approach, with its dedicated voluntary component, can stimulate youth and

the public to becoming involved in activities that will benefit the site. Initiatives such as

heritage cleaning, awareness raising and fostering a greater understanding of the site's

history need support on a recurring basis. Regular events held in designated areas of the

site help in bringing it to life for a large number of people. The Maidan-e-Diwan-e-Aam is

the most suitable venue for holding public functionsfor example, its highly effectively use

for large-scale public events in the Karavan 'HeritageFest' in January 2004. The Karavan

office must aim to:

ensure regular and meaningful dialogue with the local community and relevant

government departments;

The following tools and models will usefully help achieve these aims.

( ) is an initiative that helps foster local community

stewardship over the vast and varied heritage resources in the Asia and Pacific

region. The programme aims to encourage local community action for heritage

conservation, within existing legal frameworks and under the supervision of

conservation professionals. Project activities assist people living within or near

heritage sites to take a leading role in site management and preventive conservation,

and site interpretation for visitors. This provides local communities with the

opportunity to benefit both economically and socially from conservation of their

community's heritage.

to understand how the local community perceives and values the site;

respond to their willingness to contribute to the future of the site;

understand community expectations and how they can be met;

ensure the community understands the site's status and importance.

� UNESCO LEAP

Local Effort and Preservation LEAP

131

Page 154: Lf Master Plan

Student Virsa Volunteer Programme

Schools Programme

The enthusiasm of youth and students needs harnessing through the creation of a

Virsa Volunteer Programme for young volunteers. Volunteers can immediately

begin to supplement the number of guards in site areas at particular risk from visitor

misuse. They can also train as guides, once a brief training module exists to provide

the volunteers with authentic and relevant information. The Community Outreach

Unit will need to put together the module, arrange for their training and providing

overall supervision.

The Community and Youth Outreach Cell needs to develop a Schools Programme to

strengthen existing links with schools previously involved in programmes at the site

and to create new ones who have not yet participated. There are a number of ways to

do this, including:

i. designing and implementing a youth and student 'Virsa Volunteers' programme;

ii. staging an event of some kind every month, involving youth and women;

iii. extending the Karavan World Heritage Mural exercise;

iv. counting school and student attendance;

v. planning ways to spread authentic information about the Fort and other World

Heritage sites, targeted at children, young people and women;

vi. promoting the UNESCO programme.

Restoration of the historical relationship between Lahore Fort

and the Walled City

During the British period, the Fort was cut off from the walled city with the closure of

Akbari gateway. This severed a centuries old link with the local community (see Figure

6.14)a link that a proposed study needs to find ways to restore. Working within the city's

planning framework, it will need to identify ways to reopen the gateway and restore what

would be a colourful tourist trail through history to the Delhi Gate. This heritage trail

would pass through the historic centre of Lahore, past shops, bazaars and houses and

architectural gems like the Wazir Khan and Maryam Zamani Mosques. Such a project

would require an integrated programme of restoration, environmental improvement and

presentation design.

A walled city linking study would provide information about existing tourist resources,

develop strategies for revitalization the historic environment and crafts activities and

integrating nearby resources into a comprehensive visitor package. To do this the study

Heritage in Young Hands

VIP OBJECTIVE 5:

132

Page 155: Lf Master Plan

Fig. 6.14 Map showing the Shahi Guzargah (royal route) to link the site with the walled city

133

Page 156: Lf Master Plan

will need to identify all stakeholders with an interest in the planned route, including

residents, shop owners, city government departments and agencies.

Relocation of visitor services and amenities

The present canteen needs relocating from the Moti Masjid quadrangle to the former

royal kitchens, after their planned conservation. The Visitation Management Plan also

recommends relocating food stalls to the British steps, and that the consumption of all

food is restricted to the Maidan area.

The Project Implementation Team should review recommendations in the Visitor

Management Plan, and liase with the Site Commission and site custodians on identifying

appropriate locations for basic visitor facilities. In the long-term, facilities, including

those for catering, need relocating outside of or on the periphery of the site.

Events management

Monuments and sites benefit in many ways from use; they take on meaning for visitors,

providing a stimulating and historically evocative experience. This, in turn, provides a

significant justification for the expense and time involved in their conservation. The

challenge is to strike a balance between preserving site components' significance and

presenting these in meaningful, modern context. The key requirement, in every instance,

is to identify compatible uses that require minimal alteration to the site's fabric and its

setting.

In this respect, use of a site as an event venue requires very careful handling. For example,

the live theatre staged in 2004 in Jahangir's Quadrangle undoubtedly entertained many

people. However, the accompanying use of fireworks and horses, which were allowed to

gallop through the site, posed an unacceptable threat to its fabric. Alternatively, the

Karavan HeritageFest used the Maidan-e-Diwan-e-Aam to stage vignettes from Mughal

history; and did so without threatening the structures in any way, in spite of the large

numbers that attended the event. Theatrical events using animals need confining to the

Maidan area, and use of fireworks limited to hand-held and self-contained devices that

have no direct contact with historical resources and fabric.

It is extremely important to clearly spell out these and other safeguards - for example,

those clearly identifying the areas for various kinds of activities and any limitations that

apply. The Project Implementation Team and Technical Committee need to put together a

set of and issue these to prospective site users. These

guidelines will also need the endorsement of UNESCO, the Executive Board and the Site

VIP OBJECTIVE 6:

VIP OBJECTIVE 7:

Historical Site Use Guidelines

134

Page 157: Lf Master Plan

Commission. They also need to be strictly enforced.

As a policy, the site's management should not allow events that would result in its closure

to visitors. A World Heritage Site must be open to all and not restricted to private use by

any special sections of society. As a publicly owned and funded site, it is unacceptable to

spend public money on entertaining the social elite - especially when it so urgently

required for conservation work.

Adaptive re-use of historical buildings for visitor use

The objectives of re-using historical buildings for visitors should be:

to ensure the long-term care and preservation of historic places;

As a basis for decision-making about proposed reuse of site elements, the Master Plan

divides potential uses into the following categories.

1. Historical spaces and building for display only.

2. Fragile or valuable areas, with no public access and reuse allowed.

3. Historic spaces with buildings used as backdrops for events: care necessary in

relation to installation of lighting and equipment, contact with original fabric,

vibration and pedestrian impacts. Use must follow the principle of conserving

existing spaces and access patterns without modification.

4. Historic buildings with no modifications for events. Buildings considered robust

enough, and of only moderate significance, can be used as 'shells' for events and

activities that do not require any modifications or additions to the building fabric and

are in line with Historical Site Use Guidelines on lighting, equipment, contact with

original fabric, vibration and pedestrian impacts.

5. Historic buildings modified and adapted for use as visitor facilities.Identified in the for reuse as visitor facilities and display

areas, these include the royal basements, Karrakh Singh Haveli and Bharood Khana.

They will require considerable refurbishment and modification to meet user

requirements and building code standards. This approach only applies to buildings

whose cultural/historical significance is low and condition is very poor, and where

major adaptation and modification would make it a meaningful component of the

site. Again, any works will clearly specifying in a Building Modification Brief

VIP OBJECTIVE 8:

to minimize negative effects of any change of use;

to best convey a building's historical meaning.

Visitor Management Plan

135

Page 158: Lf Master Plan

prepared by the Conservation team and endorsed by the Technical Committee. If

changes in use are of a kind that could adversely affect a building, the Building

Modification Brief must fully justify these - especially if there are alternatives that

would have less impact. Above all, proposed modifications must not prevent the

possibility of interpreting a building's significance.

An existing Environmental and Physical Infrastructure Study identifies conditions

affecting the site and its immediate environs. It proposes a framework for improving and

protecting these. The full text of Study is in Annex 4; the following section presents a

summary of major recommendations.

The overall aim is for an integrated and phased approach to the site's critical

environmental and infrastructure issues. The Master Plan attempts to make

realistic proposals for change, whilst acknowledging the complexity of many of

the environmental problems, and political and administrative realities facing the

site's custodians.

The core issues, which need addressing first, are those in and around the site that

directly affect its buildings, spaces and overall integrity. These are highlighted

here. The Master Plan proposes developing a policy to guide short and longer-

term action to address these critical environmental problems.

Policy objectives are divided into those affecting the site's environs, under

heading 6.7.2 (Environmental Plan Objectives), and those affecting the site itself,

under 6.7.3 (Physical Infrastructure Objectives).

: Revitalization of the environs of Lahore Fort and

reinstatement of a viable Buffer Zone

Annexure 4 identifies and Figure 6.15 and 16 highlight many of the issues in the site's

immediate environs. Solutions to these can only exist through joint effort by the relevant

concerned agencies and local government departments. Table 6.3 itemizes the issues,

recommends action and identifies the responsible agents. All proposed efforts require the

involvement of the site's custodians. This includes the Site Commission, which is

responsible for maintaining links and coordinating action with town, city and provincial

levels of government.

6.7 ENVIRONMENTAL AND PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN

EPI OBJECTIVE 1

6.7.1 Overall strategy

6.7.2 Environmental Plan (EPI) Objectives: the site's environment

136

Page 159: Lf Master Plan

Issue: Responsible Agent:

Garbage Collection Town & City Governments

Shifting of Rim Market Punjab Government

Re-routing of Traffic City Government

Shifting of Bus Terminus Punjab Government

Pedestrianized Areas Town & City Governments

Plantation and improvement of parks in the periphery Town & City Governments

Table 6.4. Issues related to the buffer zone and responsible agents

Fig. 6.15 Map of Lahore Fort and its immediate environs, and existing traffic management

137

Page 160: Lf Master Plan

EPI OBJECTIVE 2 :

EPI OBJECTIVE 3

Phase 1:

Phase 2:

Phase 3:

Entrance location and corresponding parking areas

In the short-term, the Alamgiri gateway will continue in use as the main entrance to the

site. However, if the proposal to open up the Akbari gateway is successful this will

become the main entrance. The present parking lot, located in Hazuri Bagh, is adjacent to

the present main entrance. Entry to this is through a narrow congested lane. The

recommendation to make Hazuri Bagh a vehicle-free area would, if adopted, mean

shifting the parking somewhere else. In the longer-term, when the entrance moves to

Akbari gateway and encroachments like the rim market are removed, the space cleared

could then become a green belt and parking area on the site's eastern periphery. Related

facilities could be located here, including a visitor's reception centre and other services

such as food outletsall in a landscaped setting.

: A phased approach to the issues of traffic and pedestrianization

in the site environs

The Master Plan recommends a phased approach to the issues of traffic and

pedestrianization, beginning with remedial action designed to be easily and quickly

implemented. Recommendations involving studies and coordination between numbers

of departments are of a longer-term nature. In brief, the phases comprise:

pedestrianization of the Hazuri Bagh, and relocation of parking to the Iqbal Park lot

across the Grand Trunk (GT) Road and interim areas to the south and east shown in

Figure 6.16;

investigating the use of plants, water features and other protective elements to offset

the adverse effects of road traffic;

enforcing restrictions on stopping and parking to reduce congestion and idling

caused by heavily polluting vehicles, particularly along the northern periphery

where a large number of buses are parked and washed throughout the day.

initiating a Traffic Planning and Management Study to investigate ways of reducing

heavy traffic on the GT Road, through diversions;

diverting traffic using Fort Road along the south of the site, to the parallel road on the

other side of Ali Park as a temporary measure while the overall traffic situation is

assessed and a permanent rerouting solution is worked out.

closing the GT road to all polluting traffic and rerouting this away from the site;

opening alternative car parking areas to the east of the site to coincide with the re-

opening of the Akbari gate, in the area now occupied by the rim market (Fig. 6.16).

138

Page 161: Lf Master Plan

Fig. 6.16 Traffic rerouting and designated pedestrian areas

139

FORT ROAD

PROPOSED CAR PARKING FOR 150 CARS

PR

OP

OS

ED

PA

RK

ING

FO

RV

IST

OR

S

HO

SP

ITA

LR

OA

D

Page 162: Lf Master Plan

Implementation of Cultural Heritage Impact Assessments

Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment (CHIA) is a legally endorsed system for assessing

the direct and indirect effects of proposed development and construction on cultural

resources. It identifies these effects and, if negative, specifies enforceable measures to

mitigate them. CHIA is a very useful tool for evaluating the acceptability of various

proposed works and development, both inside and near the site.

At present, developments in the site's immediate environs occur without any

consideration of the effects that these may have its preservation and integrity. Any

proposed development within a designated distance should require a CHIA. The Site

Commission is responsible for identifying these.

All proposed actions in or uses of the site that, if taken, are likely to have a significant

impact on its outstanding universal values should be subject to the impact assessment

process. The Site Commission is responsible for identifying situations that need assessing.

The Master Plan recommends a study to define how to best implement CHIAs in both

these situations. It will need to take a different approach when assessing works outside

the site; it will involve liaison with town and city authorities, government departments

and, in some cases, private developers and property owners. Cultural Heritage Impact

Assessments need integrating into local planning processes. Cultural Heritage Impact

Assessments of proposed works within the site have a narrower scope and conducting

them will be a more straightforward process.

The study should set out the basic procedures for carrying out CHIAs, defining

qualifications for those will implement them.

Partnerships with the Lahore City Government and the tourism

industry to achieve preservation goals

Effective site safeguarding also depends on successfully tackling external environmental

issues. Its future is integrally linked to issues of population growth, housing, traffic

control and routing in adjacent city areas. Many of the problems the site faces result from a

lack of commitment and coordination between various levels of government and

different departments. Lahore Fort is presently a lacuna in urban land use and zoning

plans, with no recognition of the need to use planning tools to protect it and to maximize

its potential to generate cultural tourism related income. Making effective and

sustainable preservation and management of the site's environs a reality will require the

commitment of all levels of government, relevant agencies and the public.

EPI OBJECTIVE 4:

EPI OBJECTIVE 5:

In the environs of the World Heritage Site

Within the World Heritage Site

140

Page 163: Lf Master Plan

A Lahore Fort Site Commission is will be responsible for bringing these stakeholders

together. Its membership will need to include representatives from the city of Lahore, the

walled city and Federal and Provincial government. Together, with the site custodians

and Technical Committee, they will need to monitor plans and developments which

affect site. They also need to aggressively pursue the Master Plan's environmental goals

and respond promptly to new developments and conditions.

Proposed upgrading and controlling of the site's surroundings will create a zone with

high land values and development potential. Developing this area for cultural tourism

associated with the site will inevitably result in opportunities for income generation

within the local community, particularly in the walled city. For this to happen clear

guidelines are necessary; specifying acceptable types of tourism and culturally related

development within the area around the site, to ensure its protection and maintenance of

a suitable buffer zone and setting.

A first step in this process is an Integrated Urban Conservation Planning and Land Use

Study; a comprehensive strategic planning study of land use in the walled city and other

areas adjacent to site, to define conservation zones. The Executive Board is responsible for

instructing relevant government departments and policy-makers of these aims.

: Surface water drainage on the site and the damage to historic

buildings

Present storm water drainage is damaging historic fabric in a number of places at the site.

The main causes are the intentional channelling of water through historical buildings,

leaking pipes and drains and consequent rising damp.

A study needs to identify remedies and design a more effective system of storm water

collection and removal from the site. It needs to specify ways of protecting highly

vulnerable fabric, like the picture wall, from water seepage. It also needs to review the

provision and storage of water at the site - a challenge, given the absence of drawings

detailing the supply and distribution system and the need to have to re-create these. The

study's review needs to recommend ways to monitoring leaks, assess the efficiency of the

tube wells and overhead tank and upgrade the overall system. It will also have to consider

the future of the current staff colony, and make recommendations for its redesign or

relocation.

In the interim, stopgap measures need putting in place to prevent further deterioration

and mitigate damage to historic fabric. Annexure 4 illustrates these measures.

6.7.3 Physical Infrastructure (EPI) Objectives

EPI OBJECTIVE 6

141

Page 164: Lf Master Plan

EPI OBJECTIVE 7:

EPI OBJECTIVE 8:

EPI OBJECTIVE 9

EPI OBJECTIVE 10:

Management of garbage and solid waste

The site needs efficient systems for removing solid waste and disposing of this outside the

buffer zone. Annexure 4, proposes some

measures. The first stage target is to have upgraded bins located at the most important

and heavily used points, and ensure waste is regularly removal from the site.

A planned Karavan 'No Litter' initiative will help to control and prevent this problem at

heritage sites. It aims to instil a sense of responsibility in the public toward the site,

particularly the young. It will involve registering and motivating school groups to collect

litter, with raffle draw and recognition certificates for those involved. Community

outreach initiatives like this heighten community awareness and help reduce the burden

on site staff.

Improvement of toilet facilities

The Master Plan study found numerous defective toilets at the site. Many of these are

damaging building fabric, principally through leaking pipes. A priority recommendation

is to remove most of these, and concentrate new facilities at strategic locations in line with

. When the need arises, serviced mobile toilets can also

supplement these.

As a first step, all pipe leaks need repairing and, where necessary, replacing. In the long-

term, all toilet and water sources in historic buildings need closing off.

: Upgrading of the electrical provisions at the site

The Master Plan recommends upgrading electrical facilities and distribution in various

parts of the site. As a priority first step, the Site Commission must have all electrical

supply equipment (transformers, poles and brackets) attached to historic fabric removed.

This work will need supervising by the site conservation architect and the Technical

Committee. The site maintenance team will need to carry out any subsequent

reconstruction work on the walls.

Enhancement of the site for evening use

The Master Plan recommends extending the site's opening hours into the evening, for at

least several days a week. This will mean reviewing existing site illumination. Section 10

of Annexure 4 presents one option for lighting the site, to permit visitor circulation and for

its beautification. It incorporates decorative bollards, spotlights, lamps recessed in the

ground and fibre optic lighting systems.

The Technical Committee and conservation team will need to carefully examine all

proposals; no option is acceptable if it involves directly attaching equipment to the

Environmental and Physical Infra-structure Study,

Visitor Management Plan

142

Page 165: Lf Master Plan

historic fabric. Similarly, it is important to ensure these do not subject fragile pigments to

excessive light; that installations do not disturb un-monitored excavations or use

unsympathetic and inappropriate design elements.

: Improved standards of security at the site

To improve the overall situation, the Master Plan recommends an overhaul of the existing

security system. It would entail increasing the numbers of on-site guards, and providing

them with communication and other equipment. Preparing a core training module is a

first stage priority, so that security staff knows which areas of the site are strictly off limits

to visitors and what forms of visitor behaviour are unacceptable.

The Master Plan recommends outsourcing security for the site's museum to a specialist

provider. They will need to put forward detailed measures for upgrading this. The

system should incorporate electronic surveillance, using CCTV. It may also require

installation of mechanical or infrared alarm systems.

Virsa volunteers can also assist in safeguarding the site. After training, they can perform

the same role as regular guards. They are likely to have a greater rapport with young

visitors, allowing them share information about the site's heritage in a way that regular

guards cannot.

The following tables, 6.56.10, identify priority levels, target dates for completion and

agents responsible for each objective. They also include assessments of the types of

resources needed for implementation.

Priority Level

Key priorities that underpin the overall Plan, and need

immediate action.

Critical recommendations needing initiating or implementing to

prevent further erosion of the site's value.

Proposals which, when implemented, will substantially

reinforce safeguards.

Long-term plans for safeguarding the site.

Target Date

Started or starting, and will continue.

Work to start as soon as possible.

Within one year.

Within three years.

Within six years.

EPI OBJECTIVE 11

6.8 Lahore Fort OBJECTIVES - ACTION PLAN 2006-12

High

Medium

Lower

Desirable

Ongoing

Immediate

Short-term

Medium-term

Long-term

6.8.1 Key to the Action Plan Table:

143

Page 166: Lf Master Plan

144

Tab

le6.5

LA

HO

RE

FO

RT

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

-A

CT

ION

PL

AN

2006-2

011

SIT

EM

AN

AG

EM

EN

TS

TR

AT

EG

Y(S

MS

)

1O

bje

ctiv

eP

rio

rity

Per

iod

Res

ou

rces

Nee

ded

Key

Ag

ents

SM

S1

Sit

eM

anag

emen

t

SM

S2

Div

ersi

fied

Fu

nd

ing

Bas

e

SM

S3

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

ns

inK

ind

SM

S4

Ack

no

wle

dg

emen

tS

yste

m

SM

S5

Mas

ter

Pla

nD

isse

min

atio

n

SM

S6

Pak

ista

nC

on

serv

atio

nIn

stit

ute

Hig

hM

ed

Low

Desir

Short

Med

Long

On-

Serv

Funds

Funds

City/

Pun

Fede

UN

E

ium

able

Term

ium

Term

goin

gic

es

(US

$)

(US

$)

Tow

nja

bra

lS

CO

Year

Govt

Govt

Govt

SM

S1.1

Site

Com

mis

sio

nI/c

all

Sta

kehold

ers

10,0

00

SM

S1.2

Managem

entTeam

Form

ation

35,0

00

SM

S1.3

Technic

alC

om

mitte

eA

ppoin

tment

35,0

00

80,0

00

SM

S2.1

Environm

enta

lF

und

TS

C

SM

S2.2

ShahiQ

ilaH

erita

ge

Fund

T200,0

00

SC

SM

S2.3

Cra

fts

Fund

T40,0

00

SC

SM

S2.4

Rsearc

hand

Public

ation

Fund

T44,0

00

SC

200,0

00

84,0

00

SM

S3.1

Contr

ibutions

inK

ind

TF

OS

Q

SM

S4.1

Acknow

ledgem

entS

yste

mT

FO

SQ

SM

S5.1

Dis

trib

ution

toA

llC

oncern

ed

T

SM

S6.1

Board

ofG

overn

ors

Insta

lled

5,0

00

SM

S6.2

Settin

gup

PC

I80,0

00

C

Oth

ers

Term

��

��

��

��

��

� � � �

��

��

��

��

��

Co

stS

ite

Man

agem

ent

Co

stD

iver

sifi

edF

un

din

gB

ase

Co

ntr

ibu

tio

ns

inK

ind

Ack

no

wle

dg

emen

tS

yste

m

Mas

ter

Pla

nD

isse

min

atio

n

Page 167: Lf Master Plan

145

SM

S6.3

Desig

n&

Imple

mentT

rain

ing

Cours

es

50,0

00

BO

G,

PC

I

SM

S7.1

Consultancy

20,0

00

C

SM

S7.2

Imple

menta

tion

40,0

00

C

SM

S8.1

Desig

n20,0

00

C

SM

S8.2

Imple

menta

tion

40,0

00

C

SM

S9.1

LFA

S10,0

00

C

SM

S9.2

Herita

ge

Audit

S30,0

00

C

SM

S9.3

Ris

kM

anagem

ent

25,0

00

C

SM

S9.4

GIS

S30,0

00

C

SM

S10.1

Inte

rnationalC

olla

bora

tion

SM

S7

Co

reC

om

pet

ency

Trai

nin

g

SM

S8

SO

P

SM

S9

Man

agem

ent

Too

ls

SM

S10

Inte

rnat

ion

alC

olla

bo

rati

on

� � � � � ��

��

��

�� �

Co

stP

akis

tan

Co

nse

rvat

ion

Inst

itu

te

Co

stC

ore

Co

mp

eten

cyTr

ain

ing

Co

stS

OP

Co

stM

anag

emen

tTo

ols

Inte

rnat

ion

alC

olla

bo

rati

on

Page 168: Lf Master Plan

146

Tab

le6.6

SH

AH

IQ

ILA

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

-A

CT

ION

PL

AN

2006-2

011

CO

NS

ER

VA

TIO

NS

TR

AT

EG

Y(C

OS

)

2O

bje

ctiv

eP

rio

rity

Per

iod

Res

ou

rces

Nee

ded

Key

Ag

ents

Hig

hM

ed

Low

Desir

Short

Med

Long

On-

Serv

Funds

Funds

City/

Pun

Fede

UN

EO

thers

ium

able

Term

ium

Term

goin

gic

es

(US

$)

(US

$)

Tow

nja

bra

lS

CO

Term

Year

Govt

Govt

Govt

CO

S1

CO

S1.1

Em

erg

ency

Work

s*

*221,8

18

SC

,MT,

CT

CO

S1.2

Sta

bili

zation

Work

s*

*258,2

72

SC

,MT,

CT

CO

S1.3

Pre

ventive

Conserv

ation/M

ain

tenance

**

*1,0

31,7

32

SC

,MT,

CT

CO

S1.4

Conserv

ation

**

*1,3

50,5

98

SC

,MT,

CT

CO

S1.5

Stu

die

s60,0

03

SC

,MT

2,9

22,4

23

CO

S2.1

Pro

cedure

for

Conserv

ation

Work

sS

,T

DC

,RC

,

MT

CO

S3.1

Docum

enta

tion

S30,0

00

DC

,C

T

CO

S4.1

Consultancy

15,0

00

C

CO

S4.2

Upgra

din

gP

rogra

mm

eS

100,0

00

Co

nse

rvat

ion

Pri

ori

tyA

ctio

n

CO

S2

Pro

ced

ure

for

Co

nse

rvat

ion

Wo

rks

CO

S3

Det

aile

dD

ocu

men

tati

on

CO

S4

Up

gra

din

gC

on

serv

atio

nL

abo

rato

ry

��

��

� �

� � �

� �

Co

stC

on

serv

atio

nP

rio

rity

Act

ion

Pro

ced

ure

for

Co

nse

rvat

ion

Wo

rks

Det

aile

dD

ocu

men

tati

on

115,0

00

CO

S5.1

Repository

Imple

menta

tion

S60,0

00

MT,C

T

60,0

00

Co

nse

rvat

ion

Lab

ora

tory

Co

stR

epo

sito

ryIm

ple

men

tati

on

CO

S5

Rep

osi

tory

Imp

lem

enta

tio

n

Page 169: Lf Master Plan

147

CO

S6

Rei

nst

alla

tio

no

fO

rig

inal

Ele

men

ts

CO

S7

Co

nse

rvat

ion

Lib

rary

CO

S8

Cra

fts

Trai

nin

g

CO

S9

Cra

fts

Co

llect

ion

CO

S10

Lim

its

on

use

of

Co

ntr

acto

rs

CO

S6.1

Rein

sta

llation

ofO

rigin

alE

lem

ents

S50,0

00

MT,C

T

50,0

00

CO

S7.1

Conserv

ation

Lib

rary

S100,0

00

10,0

00

100,0

00

CO

S8.1

Cra

fts

Tra

inin

gS

40,0

00

MT

CO

S9.1

Cra

fts

Colle

ction

S10,0

00

RC

CO

S10.1

Lim

its

on

use

ofC

ontr

acto

rsS

,T

MT,C

T

Co

stR

ein

stal

lati

on

of

Ori

gin

alE

lem

.

Co

nse

rvat

ion

Lib

rary

Cra

fts

Trai

nin

g

Co

sto

fC

raft

sC

olle

ctio

n

Lim

its

on

use

of

Co

ntr

acto

rs

��

��

� �

Page 170: Lf Master Plan

148

Tab

le6.7

Lah

ore

Fo

rtO

BJE

CT

IVE

S-

AC

TIO

NP

LA

N2006-2

011

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

DM

AIN

TE

NA

NC

E(M

M)

3O

bje

ctiv

eP

rio

rity

Per

iod

Res

ou

rces

Nee

ded

Key

Ag

ents

Hig

hM

ed

Low

Desir

Short

Med

Long

On-

Serv

Funds

Funds

City/

Pun

Fede

UN

EO

thers

ium

able

Term

ium

Term

goin

gic

es

(US

$)

(US

$)

Tow

nja

bra

lS

CO

Term

Year

Govt

Govt

Govt

� � �

��

��

MM

1M

on

ito

rin

gS

yste

mIm

ple

men

tati

on

MM

I 2M

ain

ten

ance

Sys

tem

Imp

lem

enta

tio

n

MM

I 3M

on

ito

rin

gC

on

serv

atio

nW

ork

MM

I 4P

rote

ctio

no

fArc

h. R

eso

urc

es

MM

I 5C

lean

ing

Pro

gra

mm

e

MM

I 6R

evie

wo

fP

lan

tati

on

MM

I1.1

Monitoring

Syste

mIm

ple

menta

tion

SM

T,M

nT

MM

I2.1

Main

tenance

Syste

mIm

ple

menta

tion

SM

T,M

nT

MM

I3.1

Monitoring

Conserv

ation

Work

SM

T,M

nT

MM

I4.1

Consultancy

15,0

00

C

MM

I4.2

Imple

menta

tion

S30,0

00

MT,M

nT

MM

I5.1

Wom

en's

Brigade

S6,0

00

MT

MM

I5.2

Expert

sC

leanin

gS

10,0

00

MT

MM

I6.1

Revie

wofP

lanta

tion

S10,0

00

MT

Mo

nit

ori

ng

Sys

tem

Imp

lem

enta

tio

n

Mai

nte

nan

ceS

yste

mIm

ple

men

tati

on

Mo

nit

ori

ng

Co

nse

rvat

ion

Wo

rk

Pro

tect

ion

ofA

rch

. Res

ou

rces

Co

sto

fC

lean

ing

Pro

gra

mm

e

Rev

iew

of

Pla

nta

tio

n

Page 171: Lf Master Plan

149

Tab

le6.8

Lah

ore

Fo

rtO

BJE

CT

IVE

S-

AC

TIO

NP

LA

N2006-2

011

RE

SE

AR

CH

FR

AM

EW

OR

K(R

EF

)

4O

bje

ctiv

eP

rio

rity

Per

iod

Res

ou

rces

Nee

ded

Key

Ag

ents

Hig

hM

ed

Low

Desir

Short

Med

Long

On-

Serv

Funds

Funds

City/

Pun

Fede

UN

EO

thers

ium

able

Term

ium

Term

goin

gic

es

(US

$)

(US

$)

Tow

nja

bra

lS

CO

Term

Year

Govt

Govt

Govt

��

� �

� �

��

RE

F1

Res

earc

hC

ell

RE

F2

Pu

blic

atio

nP

rog

ram

me

RE

F3

Arc

hae

olo

gic

alIn

vest

igat

ion

s

RE

F4

Lib

rary

Acq

uis

itio

ns

RE

F5

Arc

hiv

alS

tora

ge

and

Inve

nto

ry

RE

F1.1

Settin

gup

S,T

10,0

00

RE

F1.2

Fra

mew

ork

Fin

aliz

ed

and

Pro

mulg

ate

dS

RC

RE

F2.1

Pro

gra

mm

eP

lan

SR

C

RE

F2.2

FirstP

ublic

ations

S25,0

00

RC

RE

F3.1

Deta

iled

Pro

posal

S20,0

00

C

RE

F3.2

Impem

enta

tion

and

Report

sS

20,0

00

RE

F4.1

Lib

rary

Acquis

itio

ns

S26,0

00

RE

F5.1

Arc

hiv

alsto

rage

and

invento

ryS

50,0

00

DC

,RC

Co

sto

fR

esea

rch

Cel

l

Co

sto

fP

ub

licat

ion

Pro

gra

mm

e

Co

sto

fP

ub

licat

ion

Pro

gra

mm

e

Co

sto

fL

ibra

ryA

cqu

isit

ion

s

Co

sto

fArc

hiv

alS

tora

ge

&In

ven

tory

Page 172: Lf Master Plan

150

Tab

le6.9

SH

AH

IQ

ILA

OB

JEC

TIV

ES

-A

CT

ION

PL

AN

2006-2

011

VIS

ITA

TIO

NP

OL

ICY

(VIP

)

5O

bje

ctiv

eP

rio

rity

Per

iod

Res

ou

rces

Nee

ded

Key

Ag

ents

Hig

hM

ed

Low

Desir

Short

Med

Long

On-

Serv

Funds

Funds

City/

Pun

Fede

UN

EO

thers

ium

able

Term

ium

Term

goin

gic

es

(US

$)

(US

$)

Tow

nja

bra

lS

CO

Term

Year

Govt

Govt

Govt

��

��

� �

� �

��

��

VIP

1E

mer

gen

cyP

rote

ctio

nP

lan

VIP

2S

ite

Inte

rpre

tati

on

VIP

3M

use

um

sU

pg

rad

ing

VIP

4C

om

mu

nit

yIn

volv

emen

t

VIP

5W

alle

dC

ity

Inte

gra

tio

n

VIP

1.1

Carr

yin

gC

apacity

Consultancy

Hig

h6,0

00

VIP

1.2

Clo

sure

offr

agile

are

as

Hig

hS

20,0

00

MT

VIP

2.1

Consultancy

Hig

h10,0

00

C

VIP

2.2

Inte

rim

Sig

nage

Hig

hS

,T

20,0

00

MT

VIP

2.3

Desig

nC

om

petition

Mediu

mT

6,0

00

VIP

2.4

Imple

menta

tion

Mediu

mS

,T

40,0

00

MT

VIP

2.5

Inte

rpre

tative

Galle

ryLow

S100,0

00

C,M

T

176,0

00

VIP

3.1

Museum

sA

ction

Gro

up

Form

ation

Mediu

mS

10,0

00

C,M

T

VIP

3.2

Imple

menta

tion

Low

S100,0

00

MT

100,0

00

VIP

4.1

Com

munity

&Y

outh

Outr

each

Hig

hS

20,0

00

CO

C,V

V

VIP

5.1

Consultancy

Mediu

m30,0

00

SC

VIP

5.2

Imple

menta

tion

Mediu

m100,0

00

Co

sto

fE

mer

gen

cyP

rote

ctio

nP

lan

Co

sto

fS

ite

Inte

rpre

tati

on

Co

sto

fM

use

um

Up

gra

din

g

Co

sto

fM

use

um

Up

gra

din

g

Co

sto

fW

alle

dC

ity

Inte

gra

tio

n

VIP

6V

isit

or

Am

enit

ies

on

Sit

e

Page 173: Lf Master Plan

151

VIP

6.1

Restr

icte

dto

Maid

an

Hig

hS

SC

,M

T

VIP

6.2

Relo

cate

dto

RoyalK

itchens

Mediu

mS

100,0

00

SC

,M

T

VIP

6.3

Consultancy

Mediu

m20,0

00

C

VIP

6.4

Cafe

teria,S

ouvenir,C

rafts

etc

.Low

75,0

00

C

VIP

6.5

Conserv

ation

Mediu

mS

150,0

00

MT,C

T

VIP

7.2

Polic

yF

orm

ula

tion

Hig

hS

10,0

00

MT,C

VIP

7.3

Polic

yIm

ple

menta

tion

Mediu

mS

,T

MT

VIP

8.1

Adaptive

Reuse

Mediu

mS

10,0

00

MT,C

T,C

Co

sto

fV

isit

or

Am

enit

ies

Eve

nts

Man

agem

ent

Ad

apti

veR

euse

Gu

idel

ines

VIP

7E

ven

tsM

anag

emen

t

VIP

8A

dap

tive

Reu

seG

uid

elin

es

� �

Page 174: Lf Master Plan

152

Tab

le6.1

0S

HA

HI

QIL

AO

BJE

CT

IVE

S-

AC

TIO

NP

LA

N2006-2

011

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AN

DIN

FR

AS

TR

UC

TU

RE

(EP

I)

6O

bje

ctiv

eP

rio

rity

Per

iod

Res

ou

rces

Nee

ded

Key

Ag

ents

Hig

hM

ed

Low

Desir

Short

Med

Long

On-

Serv

Funds

Funds

City/

Pun

Fede

UN

EO

thers

ium

able

Term

ium

Term

goin

gic

es

(US

$)

(US

$)

Tow

nja

bra

lS

CO

Term

Year

Govt

Govt

Govt

��

��

��

��

� � � � �

EP

I 1E

ntr

ance

Lo

cati

on

and

Car

Par

kin

g

EP

I 2Tr

affi

can

dP

edes

tria

niz

atio

n

EP

I 3S

ite

En

vio

rns

Up

gra

din

g

EP

I 4C

HIA

EP

I5P

artn

ersh

ipw

ith

Cit

y&

T ow

nG

ovt

.

EP

I1.1

Entr

ance

and

Car

Park

ing

S,T

SC

EP

I2.1

Phase

1S

,T

EP

I2.2

Phase

2S

,T

EP

I2.3

Phase

3S

,T

EP

I2.4

Consultancy

S,T

30,0

00

C

EP

I3.1

Pla

nta

tion

SS

C

EP

I3.2

Rem

ovalofE

ncro

achm

ents

S,T

MT

EP

I3.3

Regula

rC

leanin

gS

EP

I3.4

Rem

ovalofE

lectr

icLin

es

S

EP

I4.1

Consultancy

30,0

00

C

EP

I4.2

LegalE

nfo

rcem

entS

tructu

re

EP

I5.1

Part

ners

hip

with

City

and

Tow

nG

ovt.

TS

C

En

tran

cean

dC

arP

arki

ng

Traf

fic

and

Ped

estr

ian

izat

ion

Sit

eE

nvi

orn

sU

pg

rad

ing

Cu

ltu

ral H

erit

age

Imp

act

Ass

essm

ent

Par

tner

ship

wit

hC

ity

&T o

wn

Go

vt.

?

? ?

? ?

Page 175: Lf Master Plan

153

EP

I 6D

rain

age

EP

I 7G

arb

age

and

So

lidW

aste

EP

I 8To

ilet

Fac

iliti

es

EP

I 9E

lect

rica

l Ser

vice

s

EP

I 10

Nig

ht

Illu

min

atio

n

EP

I 11

Sec

uri

ty

EP

I6.1

Inte

rim

Pla

nD

evelo

pm

entand

Imple

menta

tion

MnT

EP

I6.2

Consultancy

20,0

00

C

EP

I6.3

Imple

menta

tion

S,T

100,0

00

MT,M

nT

EP

I7.1

Public

Education

Initia

tive

S8,0

00

CO

C,V

V

EP

I7.2

imple

menta

tion

Pro

posals

S20,0

00

EP

I8.1

Rem

ovalofoutofserv

ice

toile

tsS

1,0

00

MT

EP

I8.2

Insta

llation

ofport

able

toile

tsS

30,0

00

MT

EP

I9.1

Rem

ovalofoffendin

gin

sta

llations

S5,0

00

MT

EP

I9.2

Genera

lupgra

din

gS

100,0

00

MT

EP

I10.1

Consultancy

for

Illu

min

ation

Pla

nS

20,0

00

C

EP

I10.2

Insta

llation

ofill

um

ination

equip

ment

S100,0

00

MT,C

EP

I10.3

Open

for

evenin

gS

EP

I11.1

Tra

inin

gm

odule

sfo

rguard

sand

volu

nte

ers

SM

T

EP

I11.2

Specia

listpro

posal

*20,0

00

SC

,M

T

EP

I11.3

Imple

menta

tion

*75,0

00

SC

,M

T

S50,0

00

MT,

Co

sto

fD

rain

age

Co

sto

fG

arb

age

and

So

lidW

aste

Co

sto

fTo

ilet

Fac

iliti

es

Co

sto

fE

lect

ric

Ser

vice

s

Co

sto

fIll

um

inat

ion

Co

sto

fS

ecu

rity

� � �

��

� � ��

��

� �

� �

��

Page 176: Lf Master Plan

154

6.9 CONSERVATION PRIORITY LIST

Table 6.11 sets out priorities for implementing various types of preservation work at site.

Table 6.12 sets out Year-wise targets for conservation action over the six years of the

Master Plan. The Conservation Action Priority List was prepared after careful evaluation

of buildings and structures, including Condition Surveys. It identifies structures at risk

unless immediate action is taken, and others which are stable and requiring only long-

term conservation.

The list divides work into three levels of priority:

Priority 1 actions includes all emergency and stabilization work;

Priority 2 actions includes preventative conservation action;

Priority 3 actions includes ongoing conservation needs.

With a comprehensive list detailing the condition of various structures, it is possible to

carry out conservation in line with the priority list. This will ensure endangered

structures receive emergency attention and stabilization as soon as possible.

6.10 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER SPECIALIST STUDIES

The following list of recommended specialist studies and projects will support the Master

Plan's effective implementation. Some are studies. Site management / staff or consultants can

do these as part of an ongoing preservation programme.

to identify potential risks to the World Heritage Site and design a programme of detailed

preventative action [with consultant];

to set up a purpose-designed GIS Database for the site and train the management team in

its use and applications [with consultant];

to work with site management and staff in defining all tasks and designing basic training

needs [with consultant];

to assess the present situation, implement basic upgrading and design a phased

programme of future improvements [with consultant];

to systematically search the site for material needing curation; design a computerized

inventory system to document all material for easy access; and to identify a location for a

centralized storage facility;

Risk Assessment and Management Plan:

GIS design and implementation:

Core Competency Training Plan:

Conservation laboratory study:

Repository Plan:

Page 177: Lf Master Plan

155

Monitoring checklists:

Archaeological monitoring programme:

Proposal for archaeological research and investigations:

Design of a research framework:

to design building-specific checklists for monitoring and assessing condition,maintenance and conservation needs [with consultant];

to design a method of monitoring all excavation works on site; to ensure retrieval ofarchaeological finds and data while protecting monuments and deposits [withconsultant];

to retrieve information about Mughal use and design of open spaces and the historicalhydraulic system; to design a system for archaeological monitoring of works on site [withconsultant];

to identify gaps in knowledge and areas for priority research; to promote interest in theacademic community;

Publication programme:

Drainage study:

Site interpretation study:

Museums upgrade initiative:

Carrying capacity study:

Historic site use guidelines preparation:

Crafts design, sales and marketing study:

Walled city link study:

to set an agenda for future publication and production of all forms of printed and digitalmaterial;

detailed survey and study of the site's drainage and associated conservation issues [withconsultant];

to develop an integrated interpretation policy for presenting Lahore Fort to visitors,producing an overall policy, themes for presentation and implementation plans [withConsultant];

to research and then carry out an inventory, redesign of display presentation andimprovements to physical conditions and layout;

to assess how many people can enter areas of the site and how this affects it, in order to setmanagement guidelines for visitation [with consultant];

to create guidelines and rules for the use of all parts of site for public events, to safeguardit;

to defining a strategy for the design, quality control, sales and marketing of products fromthe Workshops [with consultant];

to design a linking route, recommend a method for implementing this and negotiate planswith all stakeholders [with consultant].

Page 178: Lf Master Plan

156

Page 179: Lf Master Plan

157

Page 180: Lf Master Plan

Lahore Fort SafeguardingYear-Wise Conservation Targets - 2005

Table 6.12(a) Year-wise Targets for 2006

No. Name Studies Emerg- Stabili-Zation Cons vation Source

TOTAL 57,737 180,919 187926.182 246,033 14,545

GRAND TOTAL 687,161

Prev. Conser- Fundingency

1.2 Diwan-e-Aam 1,818

1.3 Daulat Khana-e-Khass-o-Aan 7,273 5,818

1.5 Makatib Khana 5,455 7,273 19,055

2.2 Moti Masjid 7.273 32,727 7.273 12,727

2.3 Mai Jindan Haveli 5,455

3.2 Janoobi Iwans 18,182

3.4 Mashriqui Suite 2,364 8,182

3.5 Mashriqui Burj 10.909 8.182

3.6 Bangla Pavilion East 2,727

3.7 Jahangir's Khwabgah 6,545

3.8 Maghribi (West) Burj 10,909 8,182

3.9 Maghribi (West) Suite 909

3.11 Zenana Hammam 12,727 10,000

4.2 Diwan-e-Khass 9,091 23,636 23,636 10,000

4.4 Hammam-e-Badhshahi 5,455 36,364

5.2 Imperial Zenana Mosque 22,727 29,091 5,455

5.3 Kala Burj 5,455 29,091

5.4 Lal Burj 5,455 20,909 25,455

7.1 Shah Burj Forecourt 36,364

7.2 Athdara 7,273 2,909

7.3 Shah Burj Quadrangle 17,241

7.4 Shish Mahal 12,727 UNESCO

7.7 West Sehdara Pavilion S 1,364

7.8 Naulakha Pavilion 5,000 2,273

7.9 West Sehdara Pavilion N 1,364

9.1 West Pictured Wall 5,000

9.2 North Pictured Wall 9,091 40,919

10.4 Imperial Kitchens 18,182 27,273

10.6 Akbari Darwaza 14,545 22,727 14,545

10.8 Alamgiri Darwaza 18,182

UNESCO

UNESCO

UNESCO

UNESCO

UNESCO

UNESCO

158

Page 181: Lf Master Plan

Lahore Fort SafeguardingYear-Wise Conservation Targets - 2006

Table 6.12(b) Year-wise Targets for 2007

No. Name Studies Emerg- Stabili- Prev. Conser- Fundingency Zation Cons vation Source

1.2 Diwan-e-Aam 36,909

1.3 Daulat Khana-e-Khass-o-Aan 14,545 56,364

1.4 Karrak Singh Haveli 47,273

1.5 Makatib Khana 28,582

2.2 Moti Masjid 24,545

3.2 Janoobi Iwans 20,000 21,818

3.3 Mashriqui Iwans 16,364

3.5 Mashriqui Burj 12,727

3.6 Bangla Pavilion East 4,545

3.7 Jahangir's Khwabgah 11,818

3.8 Maghribi (West) Burj 12,727

3.9 Maghribi (West) Suite 8,182

3.10 Maqhribi (West) Iwans 13,636

3.11 Zenana Hammam 13,636

4.2 Diwan-e-Khass 38,182

4.3 Khwabgah-e-Shah Jahani 29,909

4.4 Hammam-e-Badhshahi 17,273 26,354

4.5 Arz Gah 2,364

5.2 Imperial Zenana Mosque 14,545

5.3 Kala Burj 43,636

5.4 Lal Burj 38,182

6.3 South Dalans 4,091

6.4 North Dalans 9,091

6.5 Gor Darwaza 2,273

7,1 Shah Burj Forecourt 11,818

7.2 Athdara 11,818

7.4 Shish Mahal 20,000

7.5 East Sehdara 5,000

7.6 South Dalans 7,000

7.8 Naulakha Pavilion 10,000

7.9 West Sehdara Pavilion N 5,000

8.1 Shah Burj Darwaza 5,000 9,000

8.2 Hathi Paon & Ghulam Gardish 10,909 30,909

9.1 West Pictured Wall

9.2 North Pictured Wall 40,919 54,545

10.4 Imperial Kitchens 27,273

10.6 Akbari Darwaza

10.8 Alamgiri Darwaza 36,364

11.1 East Fortififcation Wall 36,364

11.2 South Fortification Wall 9,000

TOTAL 40919 349,546 510,025

GRAND TOTAL 900,490

159

Page 182: Lf Master Plan

Lahore Fort SafeguardingYear-Wise Conservation Targets - 2007

Table 6.12(c) Year-wise Targets for 2008

No. Name Studies Emerg- Stabili- Prev. Conser- Fundingency Zation Cons vation Source

1.4 Karrak Singh Haveli 49,564

2.3 Mai Jindan Haveli 30,909

2.4 Western Dalans 14,545

3.1 Jahangir's Quadrangle 27,273

3.3 Mashriqui Iwans 33,636

3.4 Mashirqui Suite 10,909

3.7 Jahangir's Khwabgah 17,273

3.10 Maqhribi (West) Iwans 28,182

4.1 Shah Jahan Quad 29,091

4.3 Khwabgah-e-Shah Jahani 31,818

4.5 Arz Gah 9,455

5.4 Khilwat Khana 2,000 5,545

5.6 Basement Kala Burj 5,000 10,000

5.7 Basement Lal Burj 5,000

8.1 Shah Burj Darwaza 10,091

9.1 West Pictured Wall 14,091

9.2 North Pictured Wall 54,545 122,752

10.1 British Garages 9,091

10.2 British Barood Khana 4,582

11.2 South Fortification Wall 9,182

11.3 West Fortificatiaon Wall 13,000

11.4 North Fortification Wall 13,000

TOTAL 10,000 10000 230,764 309,770

GRAND TOTAL 560,534

160

Page 183: Lf Master Plan

Lahore Fort SafeguardingYear-Wise Conservation Targets - 2008

Table 6.12(d) Year-wise Targets for 2009

No. Name Studies Emerg- Stabili- Prev. Conser- Fundingency Zation Cons vation Source

1.1 Maidan-e-Diwan-e-Aam 36,364

2.3 Mai Jindan Haveli 40,000

3.1 Jahangir's Quadrangle 30,000

3.12 Basements 10,000

4.1 Shah Jahan's Quadrangle 30,000

4.5 Arz Gah 14,545

5.1 Paein Bagh Quadrangle 27,273

5.6 Basement Kala Burj 7,000

5.7 Basement Lal Burj 10,000

9.1 West Pictured Wall 14,091

9.2 North Pictured Wall 54,545 122,752

10.2 British Bridge 1,091

10.5 British Shed 16,364

10.7 British Steps 25,455

10.9 Postern Gate 1,818

Curator Residence 6,364

11.3 West Fortificatiaon Wall 14,273

11.4 North Fortification Wall 14,273

TOTAL 10,000 10,000 196,183 260,025

GRAND TOTAL 476,208

161

Page 184: Lf Master Plan

Lahore Fort SafeguardingYear-Wise Conservation Targets - 2009

Lahore Fort SafeguardingYear-Wise Conservation Targets - 2010

Table 6.12(e) Year-wise Targets for 2010

No. Name Studies Emerg- Stabili- Prev. Conser- Fundingency Zation Cons vation Source

No. Name Studies Emerg- Stabili- Prev. Conser- Fundingency Zation Cons vation Source

1.1 Maidan-e-Diwan-e-Aam 36,000

3.12 Basements 25,000

5.7 Basement Lal Burj 7,000

9.1 West Pictured Wall 41,818

9.2 North Pictured Wall 122,752

10.5 British Shed 16,364

10.7 British Steps 25,455

10.10 Curator Residence 6,364

11.3 West Fortificatiaon Wall 14,273

11.4 North Fortification Wall 14,273

3.12 Basements 20,000

9.1 West Pictured Wall 41,818

9.2 North Pictured Wall 122,752

TOTAL 25,000 54,001 187,298

GRAND TOTAL 241,299

TOTAL 20,000 164,570

GRAND TOTAL 184,570

Table 6.12(f) Year-wise Targets for 2011

162

Page 185: Lf Master Plan

163

Other studies, which need carrying out by external agencies, include:

assessment and redesign of traffic management in and around the site to lessen its effectson Lahore Fort;

a comprehensive strategic planning study of land use in the walled city and other areasadjacent to Lahore Fort, to stimulate cultural tourism and define conservation zones;

To define how CHIAs can be for work outside the site, involving liaison with cityauthorities and integrating these into local planning processes; and for proposed workswithin the site.

As a World Heritage site, the Lahore Fort is the property of the community of Lahore,Pakistan and the world and every visitor therefore has a stake in its preservation. Whencarrying out projects at the site, the public need informing about the nature of the workand the reasons for it. It is possible to achieve this by a variety of means:

producing a regular newsletter for distribution to visitors, updating them on what ishappening at the site;using site notice boards to describe what work is taking place, upcoming events andwhat is on view;using information panels wherever work is taking place, giving background to this,plans and up-to-date progress reports.conservation, craft activities or archaeology 'in action' provides the public with afascinating insight into the preservation process and enriches the visitor's experience.

Traffic planning and management study:

Integrated urban conservation planning and land use study:

Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment study:

6.11 Sharing Progress with the Public

Page 186: Lf Master Plan

164

References

1. Kelly,

2001.

2. Fielden, Bernard and Jukka, Jokilehto,

ICCROM, Rome, 1993.

3. Clark, Kate, 'Preserving What Matters: Value-led Planning for Cultural Heritage Sites.'

, Vol.16, No. 3, p. 5-12.

4. Parks Canada, , 1994.

5. , op.cit.

6. UNESCO Office of the Regional Advisor for Culture for Asia and the Pacific,

7. , op.cit., p. 30.

8. PowerPoint™: computer application software for presentations, produced by Microsoft

Corporation.

9. UNESCO, Islamabad, 2003, p. 150.

10. , op.cit., p. 30.

11. Stovel, H, , ICCROM, Rome, 1998.

12. Box, Paul, , UNESCO,

Bangkok, 2001.

13. , op.cit., p. 30.

14. op.cit., p. 82.

15. , op.cit., p 50.

16. , op.cit., p 41.

17. ibid., p. 41.

18. ibid., p. 41.

19. ibid., p. 28.

20. Pedersen, Arthur,

, ICOMOS International Specialized Committee on Cultural Tourism, UNESCO, Paris,

2002, p. 60.

Best Practice in Cultural Heritage Management. Best Practice in Cultural Heritage Management

(Historic Heritage on Parks & Protected Areas): A Report to the ANZECC Working Group on National Park

and Protected Area Management,

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites,

Conservation,

The CGI Newsletter

Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites

Cultural Heritage

Management and Tourism: Models for Cooperation Among Stakeholders,

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites

Cultural Tourism in Lahore and Peshawar,

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites

Risk Preparedness: A Management Manual for World Cultural Heritage

GIS and Cultural Resource Management: A Manual for Heritage Managers

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites

Cultural Tourism in Lahore and Peshawar,

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites

Managing Tourism at World Heritage Sites: A Practical Manual for World Heritage Site

Managers

www.pc.gc.ca/docs/pc/guide/nldclpc-sgchpc

www.unescobkk.org/culture

Page 187: Lf Master Plan

165

PART 7

Mechanisms for Implementation

Page 188: Lf Master Plan

166

Page 189: Lf Master Plan

PART 7

MECHANISMS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MASTER PLAN

7.1 IMPLEMENTING THE MASTER PLAN

7.1.1 Goals

7.1.2 Term of the Master Plan

This section of the Master Plan pulls together all recommendations for action

from the various plans and discusses ways to effectively implement these.

Carrying out a plan will often mean reallocating existing time, money and human

resources. Therefore, the first step is to develop a system for actually carrying out

intended work. Just because a plan exists and staffing is available, it does not

mean that the two are effectively aligned to do the job. Staff may need assigning

new duties, or a new committee or sub-body creating. It is very important to have

a clear understanding of how the work is going to be done, and who will do what,

before any is attempted.

The goal of implementation is to advance all long-term objectives set out for the

site. In summary, these aim to:

achieve the highest standard of conservation and presentation to preserve the

site's significance;

Given staffing and funding realities, it is clear that moving towards this goal can

best be achieved by focusing on those key strategic shorter-term objectives

highlighted in Part 6 of the Action Plan.

ICOMOS recommends that the minimum period for a World Heritage Site

management plan is five years, followed by a review. This Master Plan is

designed to achieve its basic vision over six years. The first three-year period, or

Phase I, will deal with stabilization, emergency conservation work and stopping

all forms of deterioration. Phase II focuses on implementing programmes which,

work towards inclusive and effective management;

seek adequate funding for long-term financial stability;

ensure the site is systematically and pro-actively monitored and maintained;

implement a comprehensive access policy for a wide range of people;

enhance the quality of the visitor experience through sustainable visitation;

continue to build strong relations with the local community.

167

Page 190: Lf Master Plan

168

while less urgent, are still central to the site's effective management and

conservation. Long-term action, extending beyond the six-year term, comprises

Phase III.

Schematic timetables for the Action Plan's various components are set out in the

Lahore Fort Objectives - Action Plan, Table 6.4 - 6.9.

Conservation and maintenance of the Lahore Fort will be a continuous process,

subject to funding, and cannot strictly follow an imposed schedule. The Master

Plan sets out priorities for conservation work and highlights buildings and

elements needing emergency conservation. As funding becomes available,

decisions on using it most effectively need to follow defined priorities.

Section 1.5 lists key agencies and partners involved in implementing the Master

Plan. The Lahore World Heritage Executive Board and the Site Commission will

have overall responsibility for ensuring recommended actions are implemented

in line with Plan priorities and guidelines. The Technical Committee will advise

them and work with the Project Implementation Team, who will function as the

executive arm. The World Heritage Centre will also play an important advisory

and training role, providing links with international expertise and potential

funding sources.

Given the shared responsibility for the site, it is important that all parties formally

agree to and support Master Plan requirements - particularly the Federal and

Punjab Governments, as respective owner and custodian of the site. The goal is to

make the document legally binding on the custodians, those responsible for

administration and management, the Executive Board, the Site Commission and

the Project Implementation Team.

Figure 7.1 shows the parties responsible for implementing the Action Plan.

7.1.3 Agents responsible for implementation

Page 191: Lf Master Plan

169

UNESCO World Heritage Centre

Federal Departmentof Archaeology

PCI Board of Governor

Pakistan ConservationInstitute

Research andPublication Cell

DocumentationCentre

CommunityOutreach Cell

Laboratory

Federal

Government

Departments

Punjab

Government

Departments

Lahore Town

and City

Government

Departments

Punjab Departmentof Archaeology

Site Commission

Technical Committee

Site ManagementGroup

MonitoringTeam

MaintenanceTeam

ConservationTeam

Pool of private, corporate, public and community workers toassist in all aspects of managing and preserving Lahore Fort:

Figure 7.1 Partners responsible for implementing Action Plan components

LibraryCommittee

HeritageNGOs

Friends ofLahore Fort

Museums ActionGroup

AcademicInstitutions

Community ActionGroup

TourismIndustry

VirsaVolunteers

Private/ CorporateSector

Page 192: Lf Master Plan

170

7.2 REVIEWING THE MASTER PLAN

a. Ongoing evaluation

b. An annual performance review

c. Three-year audit

d. Long-term programme evaluation

Conserving and managing a World Heritage Site is a dynamic process. It does not stop

with the production of a Master Plan document. Decisions beyond the scope or control of

the Plan programme can change the conditions it aims to influence. The action plan may

not be able to meet its goals if there are changes in the problems and issues it aims to

address. Action plan objectives will need reviewing, and decisions made about best

future strategies. In this way, it will continue to be flexible and relevant. This is in line

with the , which states that 'reviews

at regular intervals can, if the planning process is scientific and logical, correct mistakes

and refine concepts.'

Implementing a system for reviewing issues and strategies will enable revision of the

Master Plan, as and when this is necessary (Figure 7.2). This would entail updating and

reissuing the concerned section, recording any change or addition under Plan

amendments.

Reviewing the Plan will involve applying the following procedures in an integrated way.

This involves continually looking at what you are doing and how you are doing it.

The Project Implementation Team and other custodial staff perform this type of

evaluation daily, as part of their regular routine.

This is a more formal level of evaluation, to check whether Master Plan objectives are

being met and determining the most effective strategies for the following year. Using

new information collected from amendment records, an annual progress review to

measure progress against short-term Action Plan objectives. The site custodians and

Project Implementation Team will conduct these annually, with support from the

Technical Committee.Prioritizing conservation needs will be an important part of annual performance

reviews, to ensure that funds spent effectively. This will be a Technical Committee

responsibility, carried out in consultation with the Project Implementation Team.

The three-yearly Heritage Audit will evaluate the effectiveness of Master Plan

proposals in safeguarding the site's values and authenticity.

At the end of its six-year term, a review will thoroughly examine the management

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites

1

plan's strategic components including:

the vision statement;�

Page 193: Lf Master Plan

171

the statement of goals;

identification of objectives;

Action Plan elements.

This will determine whether the plan still meets site and community needs, and

whether a major programme overhaul or rethink is required. Long-term evaluation

will involve a wide range of stakeholders, including the Executive Board, Site

Commission, Technical Committee, Project Implementation Team and expert

advisors.

The World Heritage Committee requires periodic reports on the state of conservation

of the World Heritage properties in its territories. The Committee stipulate that

reporting must be carried out every six years. The site's next report is due in 2008.

The purpose of periodic reporting is to:

provide an assessment of the application of the World Heritage Convention;

provide an assessment of whether the property's World Heritage values are being

maintained;

provide up-to-date information about the property, recording any change of

circumstances and its state of conservation;

provide a means for regional cooperation and exchange of information and

experiences between States Parties.

Section II of requires a

description of the management in place at the site, an assessment of the factors

affecting the property and an analysis of the state of monitoring of the site. This

details the property's condition, using key indicators for measure the state of

conservation. If, as is the case with the Lahore Fort, no indicators were identified at the

time of inscription, they need to be developed for future reporting. However, it is not

clear whether this happened as part of the 2002 reporting exercise.

The state that:

‘Up-to-date information should be provided in respect of each of the key

indicators. Care should be taken to ensure that this information is as accurate and

reliable as possible, for example by carrying out observations in the same way,

using similar equipment and methods at the same time of the year and day.'

Based on this assessment, the guidelines require a description of proposed future

actions. The proposed review programme of on-going evaluation, annual

performance review, three year audit and long term programme evaluation will

generate this 'up-to-date- information' for integration into the periodic reporting

process.

e. Periodic Reporting

The State of Conservation of Specific World Heritage Properties

World Heritage Guidelines on Periodic Reporting

2

3

Page 194: Lf Master Plan

172

ONGOING In House Evaluation (MG)

Review of ConservationProposals (TC)

Review of Planning andInfrastructure Proposals (SC)

Review of ConservationWorks (MG + TC)

Annual PerformanceReview (MG + TC)

Review of ConservationPriorities (MG + TC)

Heritage Audit (UNESCO)

Long Term ProgrammeEvaluation (MG + TC + SC +

Expert Input) and WorldHeritage Committee Periodic

Report

ANNUALLY

EVERY 3 YEARS

EVERY 6 YEARS

Figure 7.2 Diagram illustrating the review process (MG = Management Group, TC = TechnicalCommittee, SC = Site Commission)

7.3 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR REVIEWING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE

MASTER PLAN

Performance indicators, or indicators of change, are the most effective tools for reviewing

the implementation progress. They allow management and decision-makers to monitor

progress and plan for mid-course corrections to programming. Indicators must be

reliable signals that tell, directly or indirectly, the real facts and answer the question:

'How do we know whether we are achieving/ have achieved our goal?'

There three types of indicators, described below.

Direct statistical indicators measuring quantifiable change in the short to medium

term.

Page 195: Lf Master Plan

173

Proxy indicators - normally quantitative but not directly relating to the expected

Result, they are used when getting the full data is too time-consuming. There must

also be an apparent connection between the proxy and expected result.

Narrative indicators that focus on the 'process of change' where the expected result

may be qualitative and a non-statistical approach may be the only possible way to

develop an indication of 'progress'. They focus on what happened because of the

intervention.

Table 7.1 presents a set of basic, short-term performance indicators to start the review process

and to stimulate further thought on measuring progress in the longer term.

SMS 1 Management Structure Is the management structure formed andfunctioning? How many times have all partiesmet? Has liaison with Lahore City/Towngovernments begun?

SMS 2 Diversified Funding Has an Environmental Fund been set up?Has the Lahore Fort Heritage Fund BOG beenappointed and are funds being solicited?Have the numbers of crafts trainees stayed thesame or increased? Are sales and marketingtaking place? How many publications havebeen funded?

SMS 3 Contributions in kind Has the FOSQ generated lists of activevolunteers and contributors? How manypeople have contributed their time/ skilland/or materials?

SMS 4 Acknowledgment of Is there signage on site acknowledgingcontributors?

SMS 5 Informed management How many Master Plan seminars/presentations have been arranged? Are themain points and Action Plan translated intoUrdu?

SMS 6 Conservation training Are staff appointed and is a trainingprogramme designed? How many peoplehave attended courses and receivedcertification? Is a broad range of institutionsinvolved? Is PCI a member of the AsianAcademy for Heritage Management?

No. Objective Performance Indicators

Scheme

Contributions

team

Page 196: Lf Master Plan

174

SMS 7 Identification of job skills What percentage of guards, artisans,workers and curatorial staff

have received Core Competency Training?

SMS 8 Defined job scopes What percentage of all tasks have beenrecorded as SOP?

SMS 9 Use of management tools Has LFA been employed by management?Has the first UNESCO Heritage Audit takenplace in 2007? Has a study of risk identifiedthe requirements of the site? Is there a GISmanager on site and is database designcompleted?

SMS 10 International and How many managers/ researchers haveattended regional and/or internationalprofessional meetings? Is there aninternational collaborative project at the site?

COS 1 Priorities for conservation How many Priority 1 tasks have been carriedw out? Do they account for at least 50% of works?

COS 2 Basic conservation Are full records of decision processes andimplementation available for all works? Andcomplete sets of drawings?

COS 3 Standardized and Has existing documentation been substantiallyexpanded? What percentage of all buildingsand structures has received detaileddocumentation? Has documentation ofPictured Wall begun?

COS 4 Conservation laboratory Has all old, non-functioning equipment beenreplaced? What of basic labequipment and materials has been provided?How many staff hours of training? Is the labcomputerized?

COS 5 Centralized architectural Are all architectural pieces consolidated inone place? Can individual items be retrievedby accessing a computerized register?

COS 6 Reinstallation of original What percentage of the stored elements havebeen reinstalled?

Maintenance

regional networking

orks

Procedures

ongoing documentation

upgrading percentage

storage and inventory

building elements

Page 197: Lf Master Plan

175

COS 7 Conservation resource Is there a set of designated shelves in theDocumentation Centre? What percentage ofthe basic resource list generated by UNESCOhas been acquired?

COS 8 Architectural crafts Has the range of artisan skills been expandedbeyond the original four? How many traineesin total and how many have graduated toworking on historic buildings? Whatpercentage are women?

COS 9 Crafts resource collection Is there a designated location for the collection?Are all major building crafts represented?

COS 10 Development and use of Is more than 70% of conservation work beingcarried out by in-house rather than contractedexpertise?

MM 1 Monitoring system Do records show that every building/structurehas been monitored at least once a month? Dochecklists reflect improvement in overallcondition? How many maintenance recomm-endations have been made? and certified?

MM 2 Maintenance system How many maintenance tasks have beenundertaken? Have all maintenance reportsmet the standards of the monitoring team andTechnical Committee?

MM 3 Monitoring of Has 100% of all conservation work beenmonitored?

MM 4 Protection of Are all exposed remains mapped & assessed?Are any still being damaged by visitor traffic?Is an archaeological monitoring programmein place?

MM 5 Cleaning of the Is regular cleaning implemented? By women?What percentage of the site has received initialcleaning? How many man days of specialistcleaning expertise has been spent ondecorative elements?

MM 6 Damage from watering Are all points of impact eliminated?

Library

training

in-house conservationcapabilities

conservation work

archaeological remains

monuments

of plantation

Page 198: Lf Master Plan

176

REF 1 Formulation of a Research What percentage of the items in the researchframework is being pursued by scholars?How many regional and overseas academicsare carrying out research?

REF 2 Publication programme Have basic maps and pamphlets beenproduced? How many scholarly and popularpublications are published or in progress?

REF 3 Archaeological Has geophysical survey of the site been carriedout? Have excavations been planned/implemented?

REF 4 Library upgrading Are basic technical and storage equipmentneeds met? Is the catalogue updated and beingcomputerized?

REF 5 Archival protection What percentage of glass slides has beenprinted? What percentage of material has beenscanned and catalogued? Is all materialcentrally stored?

VIP 1 Protection of fragile areas Have all identified areas been protected bydirect and/or indirect means? Is there a visitorroute plan in place? Is the study of carryingcapacity complete and have the findings beenintegrated into visitor management plans?

VIP 2 Interpreting the site for Is the Site Interpretation Study complete andplans initiated for centres and galleries? Are“themes” identified and agreed? Are theredesign standards set? Are interim display andinformation improvements all in place?

VIP 3 Museums upgrading Is a basic brochure available? Have allcloths been replaced, labels expanded andgeneral cleanliness improved? Have displaypanels been designed and/or installed? Is theinventory complete and computerized?

VIP 4 Community outreach How many heritage awareness events havebeen staged per year? How many VirsaVolunteers are assisting at the site? Havecounts of school visitation increased? Whatpercentage of school visits is involved in somesort of heritage education activity while on

Framework

investigation programme

from uncontrolled crowds

Visitors

back-

Page 199: Lf Master Plan

177

site? Are women being effectively targeted?

VIP 5 Reinstating links with Is the consultancy complete? Has astakeholders group been formed and areinitial steps underway?

VIP 6 Appropriate locations for How many amenities and services have beenrelocated to the British Steps? Is 100% of non-canteen food consumption restricted to theMaidan?

VIP 7 Need for Historical Site Are all events open to the public? Arein place and being enforced?

VIP 8 Adaptive re-use of Have Building Modification Briefs beenprepared for all planned re-uses?

EPI 1 Buffer Zone revitalization Has garbage collection improved measurably?Have landscaping initiatives begun? Arenegotiations underway to remove the rimmarket and other inappropriate land uses?

EPI 2 Inadequate and What percentage of parking is still in HazuriBagh? Are interim parking areas beingutilized?

EPI 3 Rerouting of traffic and Is Hazuri Bagh pedestrian only? Are stoppingand parking restrictions along the northernperiphery being enforced? Is the TrafficPlanning study complete? Has traffic beendiverted from Fort Road to the road south ofAli Park? Are plans for traffic diversion beingactively pursued with City government?

EPI 4 Controls over Is the CHIA study complete? and negotiationwith city and town authorities fortation? Are assessments beingfor on-site works?

EPI 5 Lines of communication Is the Integrated Urban Conservation Planningand Land Use Study underway or complete?Have lines of communication been set upbetween all levels of site administration andthe surrounding government bodies?

the Walled City

visitor services andAmenities

Use Guidelines

historical buildings

inappropriate parkingfacilities

creation of pedestrianonly areas

develop-ment in environs of the implemen-site carried out

between site and city/Town

Guidelines

Page 200: Lf Master Plan

178

EPI 6 On site improvement of Have all sources of leakage been stopped?Have stop gap measures been implemented?Is the consultancy study in progress orcompleted?

EPI 7 Improved waste removal Are upgraded bins in place and is there avisible improvement? Has a “No Litter”campaign been initiated?

EPI 8 Upgrading of toilet Are all old facilities closed and are new mobileserviced toilets in use?

EPI 9 Upgrading of electrical Have all units attached to historical fabricbeen removed?

EPI 10 Illumination for evening Has an illumination plan been agreed? Howmany evenings per week is the site open?

EPI 11 Improved security Are guard numbers increased? Has museumsecurity been out-sourced? How any VirsaVolunteers regularly patrol the site?

Drainage

facilities

Facilities

Opening

Table 7.1 Proposed performance indicators

1. Fielden, Bernard and Jukka, Jokilehto,

ICCROM, Rome, 1993.

Operational Guidelines Sections 72-79 [Format andContent of periodic reports ], UNESCO, 1999.

3. ibid., Explanatory Notes to Format for Periodic reporting on the application of the World HeritageConvention, II.6

References

Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites,

2. World Heritage Guidelines on Periodic Reporting,

Page 201: Lf Master Plan

3.7

Jahangir's

(Bari)

Khw

abgah

360,0

00

6,5

45

650,0

00

11,8

18

950,0

00

17,2

73

3.8

Maghribi(W

est)

Burj

600,0

00

10,9

09

450,0

00

8,1

82

700,0

00

12,7

27

3.9

Maghribi(W

est)

Suite

50,0

00

909

450,0

00

8,1

82

3.1

0M

aghribi(W

est)

Iwans

750,0

00

13,6

36

1,5

50,0

00

28,1

82

3.1

1Z

enana

Ham

mam

700,0

00

12,7

27

550,0

00

10,0

00

750,0

00

13,6

36

4S

hah

Jah

an's

Qu

adra

ng

le

5P

aien

Bag

hQ

uad

ran

gle

6H

ath

i Rec

epti

on

Co

urt

7S

hah

Bu

rj

4.1

Shah

Jahan

'sQ

uadra

ngle

1,6

00,0

00

29,0

91

4.2

Diw

an-e

-Khass

1,3

00,0

00

23,6

36

1,3

00,0

00

23,6

36

550,0

00

10,0

00

2,1

00,0

00

38,1

82

500,0

00

9,0

91

4.3

Khw

abgah-e

-Shah

Jahani

1,1

50,0

00

20,9

09

1,7

50,0

00

31,8

18

4.4

Ham

mam

-e-B

adhshahi

2,0

00,0

00

36,3

64

950,0

00

17,2

73

1,4

50,0

00

26,3

64

300,0

00

5,4

55

4.5

Arz

Gah

130,0

00

2,3

64

520,0

00

9,4

55

800,0

00

14,5

45

5.1

Paie

nB

agh

Quadra

ngle

1,5

00,0

00

27,2

73

5.2

ImperialZ

enana

Mosque

1,2

50,0

00

22,7

27

300,0

00

5,4

55

800,0

00

14,5

45

5.3

Kala

Burj

1,6

00,0

00

29,0

91

1,6

00,0

00

29,0

91

2,4

00,0

00

43,6

36

300,0

00

5,4

55

5.4

Khilw

atK

hana

110,0

00

2,0

00

250,0

00

4,5

45

5.5

LalB

urj

1,1

50,0

00

20,9

09

1,4

00,0

00

25,4

55

2,1

00,0

00

38,1

82

300,0

00

5,4

55

6.1

Hath

iR

eception

Court

750,0

00

13,6

36

6.2

Sik

hTem

ple

100,0

00

1,8

18

200,0

00

3,6

36

6.3

South

Dala

ns

225,0

00

4,0

91

450,0

00

8,1

82

6.4

Nort

hD

ala

ns

500,0

00

9,0

91

1,0

00,0

00

18,1

82

6.5

Gor

Darw

aza

125,0

00

2,2

73

400,0

00

7,2

73

7.1

Shah

Burj

Fore

court

2,0

00,0

00

36,3

64

7.2

Ath

dara

400,0

00

7,2

73

160,0

00

2,9

09

650,0

00

11,8

18

7.3

Shah

Burj

Quadra

ngle

7.4

Shis

hM

ahalN

ort

hfa

ce

150,0

00

2,7

27

7.5

EastS

ehdara

7.6

South

Dala

ns

7.7

WestS

ehdara

Pavili

on

S75,0

00

1,3

64

7.8

Naula

kha

Pavili

on

125,0

00

2,2

73

7.9

WestS

ehdara

Pavili

on

N75,0

00

1,3

64

8.1

Shah

Burj

Darw

aza

275,0

00

5,0

00

1,0

50,0

00

19,0

91

8.2

Hath

iP

aon

&G

hula

mG

ard

ish

600,0

00

10,9

09

1,7

00,0

00

30,9

09

8S

hah

Bu

rjD

arw

aza

155