Development of Congestion Management Process Using A Travel Demand Forecasting Model
Huey P. Dugas
TRB Planning Applications ConferenceReno, NevadaMay 11, 2011
Causes of Congestion
Causes of Congestion
M&O in Context of Metropolitan Transportation Planning RequirementsM&O in Context of Metropolitan Transportation Planning Requirements
Iberville
Tangipahoa
Livingston
Washington
Pointe Coupee
St. HelenaEast Feliciana
West Feliciana
East Baton Rouge
Ascension
West Baton Rouge
1 Re giona l Planning
Commission Or elans
2 Capital Region
Planning Commis sion
3 South Central
Planning and Dev C ommission
8 North De lta Regional
Planning Commisson
7The Coordinat ing and Development
Cor poration
6 Kisatchie- Delta
Regional Planning and Developme nt
5 Imper ial Calcasie u
Regional Planning and Deve lopmentCommission
4Acadiana Regional Development District
MPO Part of Capital Region Planning Commission
384Text Pages 65 Maps (Graphics)449 Total Pages
www.crpc-la.org
Model Trips by Purpose
TRIP PURPOSE 2009 2012 2022 2032 APR
HBW 433,515 449,359 471,938 510,074 0.71%HBO 1,141,594 1,182,518 1,241,813 1,342,283 0.70%NHBW 415,458 430,373 453,165 490,761 0.72%NHBO 572,839 597,062 641,252 703,935 0.90%CV 243,739 254,647 275,157 303,893 0.96%EI 216,272 234,696 282,218 331,220 1.85%HBS 165,394 171,361 179,871 194,381 0.70%EE 37,190 40,305 48,484 56,691 1.83%TOTAL 3,226,001 3,360,321 3,593,898 3,933,238 0.86%
Population 687,294 711,840 747,889 808,906 0.71%Trips/Pop 4.69377 4.72061 4.80539 4.86242 0.15%n
Model Trips by Purpose
TRIP PURPOSE 2009 2012 2022 2032 APR
HBW 433,515 449,359 471,938 510,074 0.71%HBO 1,141,594 1,182,518 1,241,813 1,342,283 0.70%NHBW 415,458 430,373 453,165 490,761 0.72%NHBO 572,839 597,062 641,252 703,935 0.90%CV 243,739 254,647 275,157 303,893 0.96%EI 216,272 234,696 282,218 331,220 1.85%HBS 165,394 171,361 179,871 194,381 0.70%EE 37,190 40,305 48,484 56,691 1.83%TOTAL 3,226,001 3,360,321 3,593,898 3,933,238 0.86%
Population 687,294 711,840 747,889 808,906 0.71%Trips/Pop 4.69377 4.72061 4.80539 4.86242 0.15%
Model Trips by Purpose
TRIP PURPOSE 2009 2012 2022 2032 APR
HBW 433,515 449,359 471,938 510,074 0.71%HBO 1,141,594 1,182,518 1,241,813 1,342,283 0.70%NHBW 415,458 430,373 453,165 490,761 0.72%NHBO 572,839 597,062 641,252 703,935 0.90%CV 243,739 254,647 275,157 303,893 0.96%EI 216,272 234,696 282,218 331,220 1.85%HBS 165,394 171,361 179,871 194,381 0.70%EE 37,190 40,305 48,484 56,691 1.83%TOTAL 3,226,001 3,360,321 3,593,898 3,933,238 0.86%
Population 687,294 711,840 747,889 808,906 0.71%Trips/Pop 4.69377 4.72061 4.80539 4.86242 0.15%
HBW + NHBW Trips in 2009 = 26.3%
Federal Regulations: Congestion Management Process (CMP)
http://crpc-la.org/crpc_new/Documents/CMP/CMP_2010.pdf
Congested Segments by Functional Class
FACILITY TYPE FUNC_CLASS Segment
Count Length (Miles)
Interstate Rural 1 - -
Urban 11 22 127.7 Principal Arterial
Rural 2 1 9
Urban 14 61 201.10 Minor
Arterial Rural 6 1 3.19
Urban 16 62 175.03
Collector Rural Major 7 5 21.85
Rural Minor 8 - -
Urban 17 16 37.72
Local Rural 9 - -
Urban 19 5 6.76
Grand Total 173 586.4
CMP Corridor Map
CMS SEG_ID Length Name From Street To Street Parish Volume V/C Rank Delay Rank FC Rank Crash Rank Total Rank
Local Priority (A, B or C) CMP Strategies Comments TIP/ LRTP
211 1.12 4-H Club Road Vincent Rd US 190 LIV 11674 70 98 63 8 239 A149 1.38 Acadian Thruway Perkins Rd Clay Cut Rd EBR 30701 57 13 63 28 161 C 5.1
35 2.85 Airline Highway Florida Blvd I-12 EBR 42753 20 2 29 47 98 A TIP(P),Stage I, Stage III(P)37 2.15 Airline Highway I-12 Siegen Ln EBR 51920 14 3 29 57 103 A Stage I(P)31 4.12 Airline Highway I-110 Greenwell Springs Rd EBR 34958 27 8 29 56 120 A Stage III33 1.89 Airline Highway Greenwell Springs Rd Florida Blvd EBR 30874 55 11 29 50 145 A TIP(P), Stage I(P), Stage III39 5.47 Airline Highway Siegen Ln ASC Parish Line EBR 41203 16 20 29 81 146 A 2.1,2.4,5.1
317 4.71 Airline Hwy ASC Parish Line Germany Rd ASC 39385 26 28 29 61 144 A319 3.86 Airline Hwy Germany Rd Church Point Rd ASC 30305 59 59 29 64 211 A 5.1235 2.73 Arnold Road Linder Rd Duff Rd LIV 11591 73 111 63 80 327 C287 1.91 Barringer-Foreman Road Highland Rd Jefferson Hwy EBR 10051 91 104 101 71 367 B 2.4
73 1.91 Bluebonnet Boulevard I-10 Airline Hwy EBR 36721 19 12 29 41 101 C 2.7141 2.76 Bluebonnet Boulevard I-10 Highland Rd EBR 33680 67 31 29 44 171 A 5.1(Perkins-MD #3)289 0.81 Brentwood Drive Jefferson Hwy Old Hammond Hwy EBR 10068 90 91 114 115 410 C 2.7163 1.27 Brightside Drive Nicholson Dr 1.27 Mi West of Nicholson Dr EBR 12391 58 83 101 30 272 C Stage II167 7.22 Burbank Drive W Parker Blvd Highland Rd EBR 30352 2 48 29 109 188 A Stage II261 2.92 Burgess Avenue US 190 LA 447 LIV 9696 99 110 102 40 351 C105 1.15 Cedarcrest Ave Coursey Blvd Old Hammond Hwy EBR 17931 41 15 63 75 194 B Stage II
97 4.05 Central Thruway Florida Blvd Sullivan Rd EBR 15242 28 116 63 116 323 A 5.2171 1.35 Clay Cut Road Acadian Thruway Jefferson Hwy EBR 11036 78 99 101 74 352 B 2.4 Turn Lanes247 0.83 Cockerham Road Hatchell Ln LA 1026 LIV 10837 81 103 63 6 253 B147 1.90 College Drive Perkins Rd Jefferson Hwy EBR 34268 10 6 29 7 52 A 2.4,2.5,5.1 Signal Upgrade137 1.33 Coursey Boulevard Airline Hwy Sherwood Forest Blvd EBR 37025 17 14 29 24 84 B 2.2 Superstreets119 2.15 Coursey Boulevard Sherwood Forest Blvd Jones Creek Rd EBR 28556 70 21 63 48 202 C 2.2 Superstreets153 1.44 Dalrymple Drive Highland Rd I-10 EBR 23048 1 1 63 12 77 A 2.1,2.4,2.7291 1.03 Drusilla Lane Jefferson Hwy Old Hammond Hwy EBR 18549 35 56 63 54 208 B Turn Lanes325 0.10 E Roosevelt St Highland Rd Thomas H Delpit Dr EBR 13826 33 36 101 4 174 C 2.4,3.3313 0.45 E Washington Street Thomas Delpit Dr Park Blvd EBR 12881 83 70 114 1 268 B 2.1,2.7,4.18 Already Widened
71 1.88 Essen Lane Perkins Rd Jefferson Hwy EBR 48865 5 4 29 33 71 C265 2.57 Florida Avenue LIV Parish Line S Range Ave LIV 28483 72 22 29 16 139 A TIP (P),Stage II(P)229 5.74 Florida Avenue S Range Ave LA 447 LIV 17970 93 74 63 10 240 B Stage I(P), Stage III
47 2.65 Florida Boulevard Airline Hwy Sherwood Forest Blvd EBR 26940 39 23 29 25 116 A Superstreets49 4.15 Florida Boulevard Sherwood Forest Blvd LIV Parish Line EBR 29023 66 33 29 69 197 C 2.2,2.4 Stage III(P)45 2.87 Florida Boulevard S Foster Dr Airline Hwy EBR 36107 81 34 29 59 203 B43 1.61 Florida Boulevard N 22nd St S Foster Dr EBR 20263 111 84 29 21 245 A 2.1,2.7,4.18
169 0.90 Gardere Lane Highland Rd G.S.R.I Rd EBR 12867 50 89 101 9 249 B 2.4,5.1 Stage I(P)117 1.89 George O'Neal Rd Jones Creek Rd Woodlake Dr EBR 18013 84 78 114 76 352 C All Signals Rebuilt 273 4.14 Goodwood Boulevard E Airport Dr S Flannery Rd EBR 17525 99 72 101 70 342 A TIP(P)
63 3.31 Government Street Saint Ferdinand Street Jefferson Hwy EBR 20233 100 80 29 18 227 B Stage II(P)99 5.76 Greenwell Springs Road Sherwood Forest Blvd Magnolia Bridge Rd EBR 28341 8 25 29 95 157 A Superstreets61 5.26 Greenwell Springs Road N Foster Rd Sherwood Forest Blvd EBR 27984 75 35 29 78 217 C 2.293 2.12 Greenwell Springs Road Hooper Rd LA 37 EBR 14777 21 76 29 108 234 B 2.4,5.1
277 2.74 Greenwell Street Airline Hwy Joor Rd EBR 13211 102 108 63 34 307 B 2.4 Superstreets267 1.49 Harding Boulevard I-110 Plank Rd EBR 13723 116 74 63 2 255 A 2.2,5.1225 1.17 Hatchell Lane US 190 LA 1030 LIV 15024 31 60 63 3 157 A Turn Lanes139 3.67 Highland Rd Stanford Ave Staring Lane EBR 14802 44 65 63 42 214 B 3.3 Stage I131 2.03 Highland Road Perkins Rd Jefferson Hwy EBR 29229 6 24 29 36 95 A157 2.61 Highland Road Terrace Ave Stanford Ave EBR 17395 31 26 63 5 125 A 3.3,5.1 Turn Lanes165 6.03 Highland Road Staring Lane Perkins Rd EBR 14618 32 68 63 66 229 B Stage II(P),Stage III(P)
89 9.94 Hooper Road Plank Rd Greenwell Springs Rd EBR 20025 52 69 63 82 266 C TIP259 14.94 I-10 ASC Parish Line LA 22 ASC 26426 93 85 7 89 274 A 5.1,4.5 LaDOTD
5 5.26 I-10 (EB) I-110 I-10/I-12 Split EBR 52189 23 7 7 65 102 A TIP(P),Stage I(P)4 1.86 I-10 (EB) EBR Parish Line I-110 EBR 32438 34 45 7 105 191 B 2.97 9.99 I-10 (EB) I-10/I-12 Split ASC Parish Line EBR 31106 53 37 7 92 189 A TIP1 3.82 I-10 (EB) Lobdell Hwy EBR Parish Line WBR 28351 29 40 7 45 121 A 5.1,2.3,4.12 TIP(P), Stage I(P)
Segment Rankings and Prioritization Process
Congestion Management Process Corridor Map – Dataview (Partial)
Geo
Crash Rate Estimation
Crash Rate (Rse) Formula
Rse = {(A)(1,000,000)} / {(365)(T)(V)(L)}
where:
Rse = Crash Rate of Section of Exposure in accidents per million vehicle miles of travel (ACC/MVM)
A = Total number of accidents on the roadway section for the analysis period
T = Time period of the study (in years or fraction of years)
V = Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) during the study period
L = Length of section in miles
Thematic Map of Volumes with 2008 Crash Data
CMP Criteria for Implementation
Criteria Selecting Prioritizing Congested Segments
– Congestion/Delay in Time (Daily Delay Vehicle – Hour per Mile of Segment)
– Transit, e.g., Does Identified segment have transit service?
– Safety (Number of Crashes in 2008 on a Segment)
– Projects Planned in TIP
– Projects in Long Range Transportation Plan
– Local Priorities
Local Input Priorities & Strategies– Ascension Parish
Example of Local Input - East Baton Rouge Parish
CMS CEG_ID Length Name From Street To Street Parish FC FC Rank Crash_08 Crash Rate Crash Rank Total Rank
Local Priority (A, B or C)
Traffic Engineering CMP Strategies Comments
147 1.90 College Drive Perkins Rd Jefferson Hwy EBR 14 16 224 9.44 9 43 A A 2.4, 2.5, 5.1, Signal Upgrade153 1.44 Dalrymple Drive Highland Rd I-10 EBR 16 62 81 6.67 15 79 A A 2.1,2.4, 2.7
53 2.52 Siegen Lane Perkins Rd Airline Hwy EBR 14 16 296 6.58 16 92 A A 2.7, 4.10. GLP281 0.26 W Parker Blvd Burbank Dr Highland Rd EBR 16 62 17 11.29 6 107 A A 2.6, 3.3157 2.61 Highland Road Terrace Ave Stanford Ave EBR 16 62 187 11.27 7 129 A A 3.3, 5.1
39 5.47 Airline Highway Siegen Ln ASC Parish Line EBR 14 16 193 2.34 81 138 A A 2.1, 2.4, 5.1141 2.76 Bluebonnet Boulevard I-10 Highland Rd EBR 14 16 135 3.98 46 167 B A 5.1 (Perkins-MD # 3)133 3.11 Perkins Road Siegen Ln Highland Rd EBR 14 16 37 1.81 94 182 B A 5.1283 0.35 W Lake Shore Drive Stanford Ave W Parker Blvd EBR 17 103 17 9.79 8 196 B A Straighten Road
43 1.61 Florida Boulevard N 22nd St S Foster Dr EBR 14 16 74 6.21 22 247 B A 2.1, 2.7, 4.1823 0.97 N 22nd Street Government St I-110 EBR 14 16 45 6.30 21 252 B A 2.1, 2.4,
127 1.25 Perkins Road Highland Rd ASC Parish Line EBR 19 113 6 0.75 113 262 B A 5.1267 1.49 Harding Boulevard I-110 Plank Rd EBR 16 62 134 17.94 3 272 B A 2.2, 5.1 Super Streets175 0.83 S Choctaw Drive Lobdell Ave Airline Hwy EBR 16 62 14 4.61 36 300 B A 2.1,, 2.7 Turn Lanes
97 4.05 Central Thruway Florida Blvd Sullivan Rd EBR 16 62 3 0.13 116 323 C A 5.2 GLP
15 3.48 I-12 (EB) I-10/I-12 Split Airline Hwy EBR 11 1 41 0.79111 240 B A
Already Widened DOTD
295 1.46 Old Hammond Highway Airline Hwy Sherwood Forest Blvd EBR 14 16 51 4.1843 242 B A
Already Widened DOTD
83 10.94 US 61 I-110 Port Hudson - Plains Rd EBR 14 16 93 0.75 112 270 B A State Widenining311 2.06 River Road South Blvd Choctaw Dr EBR 14 16 11 0.96 109 344 C A 2.7 SignalsAll Rebuilt
273 4.14 Goodwood Boulevard E Airport Dr S Flannery Rd EBR 17 103 72 2.7269 358 C A
SignalsAll Rebuilt Phase III, IV
143 0.97 Kenilworth Parkway Perkins Rd 0.97 Mi South of Perkins Rd EBR 16 62 9 1.74 99 248 C A 5.2 Extend to OLOL4 1.86 I-10 (EB) EBR Parish Line I-110 EBR 11 1 30 1.36 103 188 B B 2.9 LaDOTD
151 1.70 Stanford Avenue Highland Rd Perkins Rd EBR 16 62 40 2.38 79 194 B B 2.4 Turn Lanes25 3.30 Plank Road I-110 Airline Hwy EBR 14 16 173 6.52 18 220 B B 2.7 Phase VI
139 3.67 Highland Rd Stanford Ave Staring Lane EBR 16 62 80 4.04 45 225 B B 3.3 Turn lanes165 6.03 Highland Road Staring Lane Perkins Rd EBR 16 62 92 2.86 66 237 B B Turn Lanes
93 2.12 Greenwell Springs Road Hooper Rd LA 37 EBR 14 16 15 1.31 105 237 B B 2.4, 5.1107 0.94 Monterey Drive S Choctaw Dr Greenwell Springs Rd EBR 16 62 10 1.83 92 238 B B 4.18 Detectors125 1.84 Jefferson Highway Highland Rd ASC Parish Line EBR 16 62 32 3.62 53 259 B B 2.4, 2.7, 5.1
51 3.04 Mickens Road Joor Rd Hooper Rd EBR 16 62 52 3.46 56 260 B B 2.4169 0.90 Gardere Lane Highland Rd G.S.R.I Rd EBR 17 103 34 8.06 10 266 B B 2.4, 5.1155 0.65 Thomas H. Delpit Drive E Washington St Highland Rd EBR 16 62 10 3.85 48 277 B B 2.4313 0.45 E Washington Street Thomas Delpit Dr Park Blvd EBR 19 113 39 18.43 2 283 B B 2.1, 2.7,4.18277 2.74 Greenwell Street Airline Hwy Joor Rd EBR 16 62 62 4.69 34 309 B B 2.4
91 5.83 Joor Road Hooper Rd LA 64 EBR 16 62 47 1.77 97 328 C B ???315 0.52 Terrace Avenue Nicholson Dr I-10 EBR 17 103 12 6.40 19 332 C B 2.4171 1.35 Clay Cut Road Acadian Thruway Jefferson Hwy EBR 17 103 14 2.58 71 358 C B 2.4 Turn Lanes287 1.91 Barringer-Foreman Road Highland Rd Jefferson Hwy EBR 17 103 19 2.72 70 373 C B 2.4 Turn Lanes137 1.33 Coursey Boulevard Airline Hwy Sherwood Forest Blvd EBR 14 16 104 5.79 26 78 A B 2.2 Superstreets279 1.62 Park Boulevard I-10 Florida Blvd EBR 16 62 42 5.92 24 243 B C123 3.82 Jefferson Highway Airline Hwy Highland Rd EBR 16 62 72 2.41 77 258 B C149 1.38 Acadian Thruway Perkins Rd Clay Cut Rd EBR 16 62 80 5.16 28 165 B C 5.1 Phase IV
71 1.88 Essen Lane Perkins Rd Jefferson Hwy EBR 14 16 158 4.7233 58 A C
Already Widened by LaDOTD
73 1.91 Bluebonnet Boulevard I-10 Airline Hwy EBR 14 16 104 4.06 44 94 A C 2.7251 0.26 St Louis Street South Blvd Government St EBR 14 16 15 11.46 4 114 A C 2.5
77 2.46 Nicholson Drive South Blvd Burbank Dr EBR 14 16 70 2.07 88 126 A C 4.18 A177 4.72 Perkins Road Park Blvd Essen Ln EBR 14 16 153 3.79 49 149 A C 3.3325 0.10 E Roosevelt St Highland Rd Thomas H Delpit Dr EBR 17 103 6 11.43 5 182 B C 2.4, 3.3, Turn Lanes
49 4.15 Florida Boulevard Sherwood Forest Blvd LIV Parish Line EBR 14 16 121 2.75 68 190 B C 2.2, 2.4 SuperStreet65 2.94 Jefferson Highway Government St Essen Ln EBR 14 16 77 2.32 84 190 B C 2.1,2.7 DOA Project
Example of Local Input - East Baton Rouge Parish
Introduction to and Update on Unconventional Intersections and Interchanges
Joseph E. Hummer, Ph.D., P.E.Professor of Civil EngineeringRaleigh, NCTelephone 919-515-7733Email [email protected] LA Planning Council, March 30, 2010
Superstreet
Advantages of ‘Superstreet’ (Conceptual)
Referred to as Michigan Left, since used in Detroit for decades
Used on Arterials w/ Heavy Traffic Compared to Cross Streets
Cross Street Traffic Takes Right Turn at Intersection, Then U-Turn and Right Turn
Cross Traffic Choosing Left on Sherwood, Follows Same Path but Remains on Sherwood
Traffic Signal Phasing Reduced to 2 Phases (1 for Protected Left/Right Movements) at U-turn Crossovers and Cross Street Intersections, and 1 for Thru Movement
Advantages of ‘Superstreet’ – (Benefits)
Superstreet eliminates cross-traffic on Principal Arterial
Allows longer Green Times for Thru Traffic on Principal Arterial
So Higher Volumes Get Through During Each Cycle
Appears Counter Intuitive but Reduces Congestion
Some Commute Times have shown reductions by 50%
Increases safety by reducing the number of conflict points from 32 (conventional intersection) to 14 (super street).
http://www.texashighwayman.com/us281ss.shtml
Superstreet Advantages
Advantage Urban? Rural?
Safety Maybe √
Progression √
Capacity √
Pedestrians √
Superstreet Advantages
Perfect two-way progression at any speed with any signal spacing! Install signals anywhere You set progression speed
Pedestrians
Safe, controlled Slow, two-stage Could offset vehicles to align pedestrians Could place midblock ped signals almost
anywhere Could easily prohibit RTOR
Main street Side street
Pedestrians
Ascension East Baton Rouge
Livingston W. Baton Rouge
Vicinity Maps of Priority ‘A’ Segments
Next Steps
Priority ‘A’ Segments Eligible for Stage 0 Studies
Incorporate Priority Segments in Next Long Range Plan Update
Monitor Strategy Effectiveness
Re-evaluate CMP Process (Objectives, Network, Segments and Strategies
Process Limitations Proposed Projects
LA 1/I-10 Connector
LA 1/I-10 Connector
LA 1 Hwy 4 Lane Divided North South Direction
Connects Mississippi River Bridge on Interstate 10 to Chemical Plants South
Large Commute Pattern for Work Trips
Intracoastal Canal Bridge Near I-10 Bridge Problems of Age, Capacity, Repairs, Maintenance and Accidents (No Detour)
3 Mile New Route Designed as Toll Road
Use Private-Public Partnership as Revenue Source
Design Build Proposal
Completing Investment Grade Study
Approved Environmental Study
Modeling Shows 4 Lanes Justified
No. Year Gross Toll Cumulative ADT
0 2012 1,373,700 1,373,700 7,045
1 2013 1,646,200 3,019,900 8,442
2 2014 1,941,200 4,961,100 9,955 Need 4 Lanes before 11,000 (after 2.35 yrs)
3 2015 2,254,900 7,216,000 11,564
4 2016 2,605,300 9,821,300 13,361
5 2017 2,969,400 12,790,700 15,228
6 2018 3,169,900 15,960,600 16,256
7 2019 3,371,900 19,332,500 17,292
8 2020 3,575,400 22,907,900 18,335
9 2021 3,780,400 26,688,300 19,387
10 2022 3,987,100 30,675,400 20,447
11 2023 4,126,600 34,802,000 21,162
12 2024 4,266,000 39,068,000 21,877
13 2025 4,405,500 43,473,500 22,592
14 2026 4,545,000 48,018,500 23,308
15 2027 4,684,500 52,703,000 24,023
16 2028 4,823,900 57,526,900 24,738
17 2029 4,963,400 62,490,300 25,453
18 2030 5,102,900 67,593,200 26,169
19 2031 5,242,400 72,835,600 26,884 Need 6 Lanes before 27,000 (after 19 years)
20 2032 5,381,800 78,217,400 27,599
Total 78,217,400
LA 1 Connector Toll Facility
2001 WBR Conducted Feasibility Study to Build New Road to Connect LA 415 at I-10 and LA 1
DOTD Contracted to Conduct Alignment Analysis and Environmental Study
Environmental Study Concluded with FONSI
Immediately Contacted by Private Investors for Concession to Build as Tolled Project
Need Driven by Detour and Evacuation Route for Traffic South of I-10
Alternative Route for Local and Regional Traffic During Peak Periods
Detour Traffic for Maintenance/Repairs/Accidents Existing LA 1 Intracoastal Bridge
Serves Demand for Trucks to Intermodal Facilities at Baton Rouge Port and Operations on Northline Road
Project Description
Decision to Build Toll Facility Through Public Private Partnership
Local Toll Authority (TA) Created
Articles of Incorporation Adopted and Filed w/ Secretary of State
Bylaws Adopted at TA’s Organizational Meeting
TA Receiving $5mil from State Legislature to Prepare Prelim Design
Prelim Design Plans Used to Purchase Right-of-Way on Three Parcels
TA Advertise and Select Private Investor on Completion of Preliminary Design
Private Investors To Contract for Preparation Final Design and Construction
TA and PP to Contract for Operation and Maintenance of Road and Toll Operations
Current Status
Development of Congestion Management Process Using A Travel Demand Forecasting Model
Huey P. Dugas
TRB Planning Applications ConferenceReno, NevadaMay 11, 2011