STRATEGIC PLAN
Division of Apayao
• Social Factors• Political Factors• Economic Factors• Environment Factors• Technological Factors
EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT
• Land Area 5,113.11 Sq. Km.3 Ancestral Domain with Certificates of
Ancestral Domain Title (CADT) • Mineral Resources
Richly endowed with mineral resources (gold, copper, zinc, manganese and limestone)
• Forest Resources356,440 hectares of various forest types
• Crop ProductionRice – 104,701 MT harvested from 28,944
hectaresVegetables and Fruits – 48,070 MT harvested
from 25,000 hectares• Road Networks
Road networks connecting the different municipalities are under construction: (lower Apayao-Upper Apayao-Ilocos Norte)
Population: 112,636 (2012)70 % belongs to the indigenous communities (NEDA-
CAR)population density= 22.03 person per square kilometer63% (69,907) belong to the poor and marginalized
sectorAnnual per capita poverty threshold is Php 17,837.00 12,516 (11.12%) of the total population are under 5
years old25,874 (23%) of the total population are within 5-14
years old bracket
Population Population Growth Rate – 2.07% (1990-2010)Birth Rate - 19.48 per 1000 populationCrude Death Rate - 2.99%Maternal Mortality -1.60%Infant Mortality – 10.27%
Literacy RateBasic Literacy – 91%Functional Literacy – 76%
INTERNAL ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF SCHOOLS
Elementary • 165 schools 164 Public
-105 complete elementary -58 incomplete elementary
1 Private (with Permit to Operate)
Secondary • 37 schools 32 Public (10 annexes) 5 Private (with Recognition)
Segmentation of Elementary Schools
PRIMARY ELEMENTARY Incomplete Complete Incomplete Complete
45 11 3 105
Number of Multi- grade Classes
School Year Number 2008-2009 1532009-2010 1632010-2011 1622011-2012 1632012-2013 186
Public Schools Enrolment for SY 2009-2010 to SY 2012-2013
Level SY 2009-2010
SY 2010-2011 SY 2011-2012 SY 2012-2013
Kindergarten 1,876 1,456 2,359 2,785Elementary 18,632 19,036 18,749 18,300Secondary 6,241 6,712 6,947 7,154
Total 26,749 27,204 28,055 28,239
Teacher-Learner Ratio
Level Age Population Enrolment Variance Teacher/Student :
Ratio
Kinder 5 2,360 2,247 113 1:16.89Elementary 6-11 14,987 15,155 -168 1:29.61Secondary 12-15 9,959 4,799 5160 1:31.57
Alternative Learning System (ALS)No. of
Mobile Teachers
No. of ALS Coordinators
No. of potential Learners
Full Time Part Time A&E Elem A&E Sec Basic Literacy
8 2 5 426 174 125
Enrolment, Completers, Registrants and Test takers2012
Enrolment Completers Registrants Test Takers 1379 1114 612 398
Year Takers Passers Percentage
2009 273 12 4.402010 214 33 15.422011 493 79 16.02
ALS A&E Passers for SY 2009-2011
Learning Facilities (SY 2012-2013)
Classroom-Pupil/Student Ratio
Elementary Secondary1:30.69 1:30.20
Number of Classrooms for RepairMajor Minor
Elementary Secondary Elementary Secondary265 46 163 16
School Leadership
Elem. Schools Headed by: No. of SchoolTeacher In-Charge (TICs) 92
Head Teachers 36
Principals 36
Total 164
Secondary Schools Headed by: No. of SchoolTeacher In-Charge (TICs) 17
Head Teachers 2
Principals 13
Total 32
NO. OF PLANTILLA POSITIONS AT THE DIVISION OFFICE
Position No. of ItemsSDS 1 (vacant)ASDS 1 Education Program Supervisor 9Public Schools District Supervisor 3Administrative Staff 3
Total 17
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Elementary SecondarySY 2009-2010 89.33 43.57SY 2010-2011 98.33 47.35SY 2011-2012 101.12 48.18
Perc
enta
ge
Net Enrolment Rate
Elementary Secondary0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Cohort Survival Rate
Perc
enta
ge
SY 2009-2010 SY 2010-2011 SY 2011-20120
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Failure RatePe
rcen
tage
TRANSITION RATE (SY 2011-2012)
• Primary to Intermediate94.69
• Intermediate to Secondary 87.06
SIMPLE DROPOUT RATE SY 2011-2012
Elementary
Grade Level % of DropoutGrade I 0.39
Grade II 0.18
Grade III 0.30
Grade IV 0.35
Grade V 0.36
Grade VI 0.43
Total 0.33
Secondary
Year Level % of DropoutYear I 7.16
Year II 5.01
Year III 3.84
Year IV 3.93
Total 5.21
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
Elementary SecondarySY 2009-2010 66.52 45.53SY 2010-2011 67.23 48.22SY 2011-2012 69.89 50.81
Perc
enta
geNational Achievement Rate
NUTRITIONAL STATUS (SY 2012-2013)
Level ClassificationSeverely Wasted Wasted
Kinder 2.88 11.46Elementary 2.14 7.53Secondary .71 4.89
SWOT
STRENGTHS 1. Increasing Participation Rate (Elem. & Sec) 2. Improving Achievement Rate (Elem & Sec.) 3. There is 1 school head ( Principal, Head Teacher) for every 8
teachers in the elementary 4. Teacher- Pupil /student Ratio is 1:29 (Elem.) and 1:28.8
(Sec) 5. Regular MOOE, SBM Grant and SBRMS are downloaded to
schools6. ADSUC is conducted on a quarterly basis and as the need
arises7. Division and School Plans were crafted8. School Annexes in the Secondary have separate financial
accounts9. Some schools are recipients of Adopt a Child Trust Fund
WEAKNESSES1. Low completion and cohort-survival rate (elem & sec) 2. Low transition rate ( primary to intermediate and elementary
to high school) 3. High failure rate ( elem & sec) 4. High school leaver rate (elem & sec) 5. Prevalence of malnutrition 6. 58 out of 164 schools are incomplete elementary schools 7. 17 out of 32 secondary schools are headed by a Teacher In-
Charge 8. Low passing rate in the ALS- A&E9. Inadequate Monitoring and Evaluation to schools Low
percentage of liquidation
OPPORTUNITIES 1. Provincial, Local Officials and the Congresswoman strongly
support programs and projects of schools 2. PTAs are active partners of schools 3. Improving learning outcomes is included in the Physical
Development and Framework Plan of the Provincial Government
4. Provincial SEF is increasing 5. 100,407 hectares is devoted to agriculture 6. Forest land cover is 277,142 hectares 7. Population Growth Rate is at 2.07 % which is close to National
Average. 8. 34% of the total population belong to 0-14 years old bracket. 9. Richly endowed with mineral resources (gold, copper, zinc,
manganese and limestone)
THREATS 1. Difficult access to schools in remote barangays 2. Inadequacy of transport system in remote barangays 3. Inadequacy of communication system in remote barangays 4. Vanishing indigenous culture and practices 5. Annual per capita poverty threshold is PhP 17,837.6. Low functional Literacy Rate (76%)7. High Infant Mortality Rate 10.27%
STRATEGIC OPTIONS
(Strengths/ Weaknesses)
1. Improve accountability system of school heads on improving learning outcomes (SBM)
• Set school targets and forge performance contracts
• Revision/ refinement of the SIP based on school targets
• Conduct of Monitoring Evaluation and Plan Adjustment (financial & physical targets)
• Intensify supervision and provision of technical assistance (more focus on the remote schools, MG classes, TIC manned schools)
• Conduct capability building
STRATEGIC OPTIONS
(Strengths/ Weaknesses)
2. Improve delivery systems
• Provide technical assistance to schools to increase percentage of liquidation of cash advances
• Increase number of schools implementing SSES, ESEP
• Implement culture-responsive curriculum for IP learners
• Increase number of schools implementing STVEP
• Install LRMDS
• Develop school database for IP learners and recipients of 4Ps
STRATEGIC OPTIONS (Strengths/Opportunities)
1. Engage LGU and stakeholders to improve access to schools• Include DEDP and SIPs in the Physical Framework Plan of the
province and municipality • Increase pledges for Public-Private Partnerships • Generate community counterparts for SBM Grants, SBRMS and
other school-initiated projects• Expand Adopt A School Program through “School Mo Taranan Ko”
STRATEGIC OPTIONS
( Weaknesses and Threats)
1. Increase enrolment and percentage of passing in the ALS A&E (Elementary and Secondary)
2. Increase number of schools implementing alternative delivery mode
3. Increase number of complete elementary schools
4. Reconfigure clustering of schools for better supervision of TIC manned schools
5. Intensify M&E and Supervision to school annexes, multi-grade classes and remote schools
6. Expand Vita Meal Feeding Program and Gulayan sa Paaralan to improve nutritional status
VISION
DepEd-Division of Apayao is an educational institution
that produces learners who reach their full potentials in a
secure and happy learning environment.
MISSION
DepEd-Division of Apayao, in collaboration with stakeholders, is committed to provide quality basic education services to learners for them to become high performing, self-reliant and morally upright.
We realize this by continuously developing our key competencies on instruction, assessment, instructional leadership, human resource development, research and development and monitoring and evaluation.
OBJECTIVES
KEY RESULT AREAS AND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
REACH Objective Key Result Area
(ELEMENTARY) Performance indicator
TARGET2014 2015 2016
To provide access to all Iyapayao learners through both formal, informal and alternative delivery mode
a. Gross Enrolment Rate2012-2013-
124.01 123.47 122.93
b. Net enrolment rate 100 100 100
2012-2013-
c. Cohort Survival rate 74.66 80.72 86.76
2012-2013-
d. Completion rate 73.40 78.97 82.52
2010-2011-
e. Drop-out rate 0 0 0
2012-2013
f. School Leaver Rate 4.86 2.42 0
g. Transition Rate 97.35 98.68 100
f. Failure Rate 4.82 2.40 0
REACH Objective Key Result Area
(SECONDARY) Performance Indicator
TARGET2014 2015 2016
To provide access to all Iyapayao learners through both formal, informal and alternative delivery mode
a. Gross Enrolment Rate2012-2013
92.77 104.28 115.79
b. Net enrolment rate 70.76 82.05 93.34
2012-2013
c. Cohort Survival rate 79.08 81.49 83.91
2012-2013
d. Completion rate 71.75 73.64 75.53
2010-2011
e. Drop-out rate 2.61 1.31 0
2012-2013
f. School Leaver Rate 4.98 2.49 0
g. Transition Rate 93.54 96.78 100
f. Failure Rate 7.55 3.77 0
REACH Objective Key Result Area
(ALTERNATIVE LEARNING SYSTEM)
Performance indicatorTARGET
2014 2015 2016
To provide access to all Iyapayao learners through both formal, informal and alternative delivery mode
A. Accreditation and Equivalency (Elementary and Secondary)
1. Increased no. of enrolment 1650 2150 2725
B. Increased no. of passers who are mainstreamed in secondary schools
25 45 80
REACH Objective Key Result Area
(ALTERNATIVE DELIVERY MODE) Performance indicator
TARGET2014 2015 2016
To provide access to all Iyapayao learners through both formal, informal and alternative delivery mode
A. No. of schools implementing 1. E-Impact 3 5 8
2. Open High School Program 2 2 2
RESPONSIVENESS
Objective Key Result Area Performance Indicators2014 2015 2016
2. To provide opportunity to all kinds of learners to develop their full potentials
a. Increased number of Schools implementing inclusive education
8
16 32
b. Increased number of schools implementing SSES
8
0 0
c. Increased number of schools implementing ESEP
5
0 0
d. Increased number of schools implementing STVEP
3 1 1
RATINGS Objective Key Result Areas
(Elementary) Performance Indicator
3. To attain mastery of competencies
Increased Mean Percentage Score (MPS)
71.93 72.95 75
Increased percentage of Kindergarten pupils who achieve at 75% proficiency in the ECCD Checklist;
85 90 100
Decreased number of learners whose reading level is under frustration
2,424 1,939 1,551
Increased percentage of schools who attain positive satisfaction in surveys
75 82 95
RATINGS Objective Key Result Areas
(Secondary) Performance Indicator
3. To attain mastery of competencies
Increased Mean Percentage Score (MPS)
62.32 68.66 75
Increased percentage of passing in the A & E (Elem & Sec)
25 38 50
Increased percentage of schools who attain positive satisfaction in surveys
75 85 95
Top Related