8/19/2019 9 PDF Warehouse
1/8
Sr*ourili
Jan
15, 2016
Between:
And:
83
THE LAW SOCIETY
OF
BRITISH
COLUMBIA
Marc Pierre
Boyer
RESPONSE
TO PETITION
Petitioner
Respondent
Filed by :
Marc Pierre
Boyer
acting under
our disiricts'fiduciary
trust
as
CFA
for
several Marijuana Party Elecioral
Disirict
Associaiions
[EDA]
4-858 East
6rh Ave. Vancouver
BC,
VST
1M1
[EDA
headquarters]
THIS lS
A
RESPONSE TO
the
petition
filed
BY
The Law
Society of
British
Columbia
845 Cambie
Street,
Vancouver,
BC,
V6B 4Zg
Petitioner'sLawyer
MichealKleisinger
The Law
Society of
British
Columbia
845 Cambie Street,
Vancouver
BC, V6B
429
Part
1: ORDERS CONSENTED
TO:
As expressed
in
the attached
PROTEST
Synopsis
of Part 1: Marc
Boyer asked for and would
like to consent
to
proceed
with
responding to
points
1 thru
4
of
this Petition
/case.
But,
Iwon't
consent
to
be mistaken
by
this
pedantic trap to consent to being an all capitals
ENTITY.
A basic understanding
can
be
established
at
this
First
Appearance,
in
order
to
proceed
properly,
by
this
court
addressing the following
courses, NAMELY:
1)
Declared
that all assumptions
of holding
special recognition are dismissed,
or
(2)
Rule that my
bond has
a
face value
that
needs
to be
established
[for
example] under
the
PPSA;
[8y
pro
ceeding
under
another Act?j
Part 2: ORDERS
OPPOSED:
We
oppose the
granting
of any order that
the BAR desires
to
implement in
points
1 thru 4
of this
Petition.
As we see
it,
we have been
extended 21 days
[as
you
call
it]
from the date served
to submit a challenge
to
points
1
thru 4,
and we will be
flling
a
detailed response Petition,
in order to
proceed
with
addressing our
general
position
of:
there
is
no authority
in
any otherAct to
subvert the Supremacy
of the
Canada
Elections Act.
Part 3: ORDERS
ON
WHICH
NO POSITION
lS
TAKEN:
The
facts contained
in the
Affidavits
are
good
enough
to file
a
factual
basis, a legal basis, and materials
to
be relied
on to contest
our claim
that
no
Act
can subvert
the
Act.
As we see
it,
no
paper
queen
can commit
sedition
by
assuming that the BAR must
defend this trust
violation,
because there's
this omission
of
an
allegiance to
preclude
you
from obeying
orders that destroy
Canada and the
Commonwealth,
in
order to conform to this
paper
queen's
desire to ignore
an oath taken on a
plastic
Stone.
1.
AS
we see
if.'
we are
not contesting the estimated
2-hour timeline to
settle
this
132-
page
Petition. BECAUSE
we agree that our PROTEST
can be ruled
on,
in
this time-
frame;
in
this
way,
proceed
to
a
date set io appear on this
protest,
contained
in Part
1.
THE
LAW
SOCIETY
OF
B.C,
8/19/2019 9 PDF Warehouse
2/8
Jan
15,2016
Between:
And:
RE:
File l{o:
S-
15107
Vancouver
Registry
ln the Supreme
Court
of
British Columbia
THE
LAW
SOCIETY OF BRITISH
GOLUMBIA
Petitionen
Marc Pierre
Boyer Respondent
RESPONSE TO PETITIOIS
83
Part
1:
DENIAL
OF CONSENT
TO
grant
orders set out in this
following
PROTEST
in order
to revolve
an
Essential Element of
Law at
this
first Appearance
UNDER
PROTEST
This application
was
initiated
with
a letter
from
Mr Kleisinger addressing
a
common
law complaint
against
Marc Boyer dated July 30,
2015,lp-3
-Ms
Souvage Affidavitl
AND this
PETITION
-
S-15197
83
is
filing an action
against MARC
PIERRE BOYER, when
the BAR
is barred
from
giving
me this
straw man,
because
this lnstitution
knows that creating
this legal
entity
is
directly forbidden
in
Law, because it's
a
violation of
Sec 336
CC
-
FRAUD
Appendix
A offers
a
detailed
account of these abnormalities of
my abnormal birth
1.
By definition: the main reason
Marc
Boyer holds a criminal
record is due
to
this original
violation
of creating
this
all
capitals entity.
Frankly,
the
primary
function
for Sec 336
CC
and Sec
337 CC existing
is
because
your
Sumerian lore warns
of dire consequences,
for violating this trust that will
lead
to
answering
the
question
contained in
lCor
4:20
NAMELY:
Does
Authority again
desire
on engaging
the merciless
end of this civilization
/age
flike
Nineveh
did],
when challenged by
the
one
with the abnormal
birth
[of
1Cor15]
2.
With this
Petition, we come full circle
as
to
why
this
[attached]
gag
order was created
in
the
first
place
NAMELY: This
trust was
violated
by
Attorney General
Wally Oppal,
in
2004 12005,
who under
Sec 8
CC
Territories Act terminology:
raped me
a of
my
private
individual landed
rights. Due
to
my
abnormal birth right,
authority
is
directly forbidden
to create
flet
alone imprisonl
this all capitals
entity.
THEREFORE,
since the BAR
initiated this action means
i
can
now civilly
protest
this act
in
this
proceeding,
in order
to recognize my
claim
to the face value of my bond, so
that
good
first-fruit can occur.
3.
This decade
old
gag
order barred me from
pressing
the inevitability
of
having
to
settle
this case civilly,
which
resulted
in
your
criminal Code acting like
i
must be assimilated
or destroyed,
on
a
pedantic
assumption that without a lawyer
i
did
not know any
better.
This Civil
proceeding
must
address
this systemic abuse of my common
law
guarantees
4. As
we see
If, that's why
this Petition implies
a
few times that
just
because
being
found
guilty
under
the
criminal
Court
jurisdiction,
does not
necessarily
mean
that i can
be
assumed
to be found
guilty
in
this Civil
proceeding
where ijust
might
get'a
yes'.
ON
TFIIS: I'm
certain that
i
have friends in High
places
of
authority
that actually act
as
if on my
side;
otherurise
appearances
like this
civil solution would
never have
been
pressed.
Therefore,
ithank
all
those who
are making
this civil court daie
possibi:.
8/19/2019 9 PDF Warehouse
3/8
|
.:-..1,
Novdinb'er.27.
20f5
I1._,,
r
')
1
:',,-
MoTIoN
oN REPEALING
MARC
BoYER.S
GAG
oRDEi]J-:.-.:.--
,..
r
rl
.,
.
- -
^1-;
-
Ba-ck
in
?SQt;^tYt.arc
Boyer
was
served
a
gag
order
by
the
head
registrar
of
the
Civil
Registry
-.
.
.
called
l\r-4r.
Messenger
This
gag
order
came from filing
one
dccu 'nent that he
called
',,exat ous,
-
-"
dnd'oiigihirlly
his
gag
order
only
applied
to the civil
registry
and it now
applies
to
the criminal
registry
as
well,
because
i
keep
bringing
up
the
thorny issue
that
this court now faces again.
Except now it's
far
worse than
when
i started, and
it
can never
get
better without
someone
like
me
going
the distance
in
spiie
of
the huge
obstacles,
because if
i
don't, then who
will?
2.
ln this new case, the BAR
now
wants to
stop
me
frcm
acting like a lawyer
in a
criminal
matter,
when I'm acting
like a barrister,
who
is
defending
the
issue of
no
jurisdiction
at
the
arraignment.
[ON
THISI: Criminal
charges
are not
a
criminal matter until after the arraignment.
'1.
At
face
value:
With
this common law
motion
filed
by
the BAR,
we
have
done a
full circle;
by
this
i mean, we're
back to the original reason for this
decade old
gag
order,
except
worse;
where the
BAR
wants exclusivity
to
represent
anyone
in
any
phase
of
a
court
proceeding,
in order
to
bar
anyone like
me
from making a common
law defence because
i
know
and act on benefiting
from
the
Achilles heal that the
minutes of this vote exposed.
3.
The
larger issue
at
stake
in
this
case
is
that
after
22
years of every one associated
with
the
BAR
[ike]
law enforcement
officers are
prohibited
from
being
a common
law Peace Officer and
every lawyer has been
prohibited
from defending any
common law application in
a
criminal
matter, which
has resulted where
all Canadian
common
law rights and
Freedoms have been
systematically
gutted
by
lawyers
[in
1993] and enforced under
under Civilian Oversight
[1998]
4.
[at
face
value]
lN
THIS GASE,
of relying on
the mountain
of statutory
limitation
placed
on our
Free
and Democratic society
lunder
R
v Oakes] means the fact
remains that when no one can
defend
common
law,
results
where the BAR
is
entrenched on destroying
democratic freedom
by insisting that
theiiAct
supersedes
the Act,
which
plays
hand in hand with
NATO
passing
/
implementing
this
sedition
Aci called S-55 of the CDSA, which
[by
virtue
of
the
fact that it came
from
Royal ascentl,
results
where all BAR member can
actually engage
in
vanquishing
all its
disadvantaged
Canadians
by
causing the total decimalion
of all human rights
known to man,
because
a
faceless paper queen
called
governor
in
council
said
so.
But then
Pierre
Trudeau
called
our
present
culmination
of this
grand
plan:
'14
shorf te
rm
pain
for
a
long
term
gain"
5.
lf anyone
cares
to
take
note:
Unders-2of
S55of
theCDSAall
Public Safety will be handed
over
to NATO under anotherAct
tabled this time
by
Justin
Trudeau, with his
majority
will
pass
the full
implementation of
this seditious act of
omission
in
the next Throne Speach,
[note:
s-2,1]
"withoui
restricting
the
generality
of
the
foregaing"
After
this, NATO Federal Courts can
now
tell
Parliament
that
it
holds sole 'across
the
board'
jurisdiction
over Public Safety
in
Canada.
1.
So
the
cast
is
set,
so
this new
Zionist loving
Prime
Minister
[at
face value]
can
take that
giant
step
of
totally abandoning
our Sovereignty over
to
NATO
is almost
a
fait accomplie;
2.
EXCEPT FOR THE
FACT THAT Constitutional law
under the SCC
is
still
Supreme
in
Canada, and
a
bencher
flike
i'm facing
in
this BAR
chargel is
ciught
in a
trap
of
serving
two
masters, and must make a
choice.
NAMELY:
Will this
judge rebel
by
submitting
to
this
sedition
[OR]
will
the BCSC benchers rebel and
side
with the SCC as being Supreme?
6.
Frankly,
all
we cai do is
place
our
faith
in God, because
the fate of men
in
Canada becoming
a
banana
republic
in
their demonic
New World Order is held
by
two
or
three witnesses, in
an
insignificant
side
ruling in
a
case where
the
messenger will either be denied
the
right
to uphold
the
law as
Supreme
in
order to
protect
the flduciary trust
to Canadian Sovereignty
as
Supreme.
'1
.
SO MAKE
A
CHOICE: As we
understand
it,
this bencher will either obey
a
Sec 126(2) CC
interference
by
the
new
Attorney
General
or
the conscience
of
the Minister
of Justice, and
this choice is held
by
this new
player
on the
scene,
NAMELY:
Jody Wilson
Rayborn
8/19/2019 9 PDF Warehouse
4/8
7. In
1996, she
divorced me
shortly
and
after being
diagnosed
with
lymphoma,
i
returned
to
Canada
This
angel
told
me
to
go
to
BC,
where
iwould
be
needed
later
on
Nov
13,
1999,
icrossed
the
border,
and i
then
got
my
flrst
and
only flu-shot,
which
kicked
my
lymphoma
into
full
gear.
On
the evening
of 9/11,
i had
a very
lucid
dream,
where
i
was
told
the
recipe
to
make
my
remarcable
Soma cookies,
in order
to
cure my
ever
increasing
cancer
pains,
and
to
run with
it.
8.
At that
time,
i made myself
a royal
pain
at City
Hall, in order
to
have
my
landed
on
land
in
Canada
status
be
established, and
to
pursue
a
common law
defence,
under
the Marijuana
party.
I
was
eventually charged
for
protesting
too
aggressively
at
city
Hall
in
Jan
Sih,2oo4,
and
then
in
sept
28th,2004,
for
operating a
commercial
premise
known as
the Vancouver
East Marijuana
Party
Headquarters,
where
at
the
Arraignment
in
November 1Oth
2004,
i
got
the
charges
dropped,
and
i
was
to
appear in
a
week
to file for
damages, because
i
filed
this
17-page
article entitled
NOTICE
OF
DENIAL
OF
CONSENTTO
BE GOVERNED,
and
that
evening
my
chest
ptate
was
snapped
in
2,
by two VPD
duty
Sargents,
and
that
morning idied,
and
had
a
face to
face
contact
with
this
angel
[as
if in
a
white
cloud]
that i met
when
iwas
13
[on
this]
my
father was
54, and
i was
now
54,
and
this
angel looked.just
like
me;
At
the
end of
this
meeting,
i
was swallowed
by
the
heart of
the
earth,
[for
lack of any other
term
to
explain it]
and returned
with
this
partial
mended
broken
chest
plate.
A
few
days later,
I
went to VGH,
where
i
got
X-rays
that
showed
the
fracture
was
real.
SIDE BAR
[in hindsight] this event signalled Daniel 8:14, because
2300 mornings
later, the
tidal
wave
that struck Fukushima
hit,
where
[for
at
least
a week
before]
i clearly
warned
authority
with a
Get
Well
Soon card that
something
big
was
aboui
to
happen
on
that day.
1.
I
reported
this
broken chest
incident
at my next
court
appearance,
and
as
to
instructions
given
at
this
1st
arraignment,
i boldly filed
this
priceless
gift
from
God
/damage
award
that
is
actually
still a default
judgment,
yet
swept away and
destroyed
by
Wally
Oppal.
[Sec
340
FRAUD].
9.
I ihen filed
a
legal
paper
trap
with
Revenue
Canadd,
which
gave
me
a
great
civil
defence
that
took
..
4
months
to
set-up. i
flled
a Petition
to
have
this
criminal
case
file
dealt
with
civilly.
.Eollowing
this
1"r appearance
[where
i
got
what i catl
my court
victory]
i was
slapped
with
this
gag
order.
10.
At this criminal
trial
[on
this Party
Headquarters
charges]
a
miraculous
twist
in
fate
happened,
where
my
senlence was
read
the
day
after
the
Election
Writ dropped,
and
point
7 now
made
an
erroneous claim
that
i
was
mis'taken'
to
believe that
the
Elections
Act
offered
me
any immunity.
1.
ON
THIS:
Without
this
quirk,
i could
never have
a chance
to
add
a
trust challenge
[by
means
of a
caveat
to
my candidacyl
that
caused JP Kingsley,
his
clerk,
and
the
chief
Justice
to
resign
in
laie
December
2005,
over a fiduciary
trust
violation
that
i set up
in this
trap
/caveat.
11 . I
rekindled
the issue
of
getting
the
$1000.
deposit returned
this
spring, for
the 2004/05
election.
and
in order
to
comply
with
their
prescribed
paperwork,
i
filed
all
the
proper
articles
to
get
this
deposit
back.
The
flle was
cleared
for
payment
after
being scrutinized,
and
filed
on
time
by our
Party's
auditor.
As
to
Elections Canada's original estimate, we
should have
received
this
iheck,
before
the
new
election
campaign
started. They
knew
that
iwas
going
to
court
with
or
without
this
check,
and
since
Mr Buhler
has added
this case
that involves
lves
Coie,
actually
means,
i can
have
this court rule
on
ihis
check,
because
we
see
it
as
an
essential
element
inihis
Civil
Claim.
''I
i
,r'ri
ll
,
i)
,
,r
ir:.ii),r,r'li)r'i.tir,lli,irJrr:,
'|
l
"
,
I l| ili[ l],,|{r:ri,i
Marc
Pierre
Boyer
i'
i\.)a.r:itrtilrl..
ll{'flit
lrliil:li
laa':iifl,'.
i
j'.
r-:
ill
lirJlrri''
8/19/2019 9 PDF Warehouse
5/8
APPENDIX
A:
On
outiining
the irnportar:ce
of this
Birti'r Statenrent
/bond issue
Oi{
OUTLIS{iNG
SPECIFIC
ABhIORMALITIES
IN MY
ABhIORMAL
BIRTH
STATEMENT.
FREF,ACE:
in
the attached copy,
i
printed
a
back
to
back
copy,
just
like my
original etched
short form,
which is
part
of a long form regisky that is actualiy
like how i iaid-up
the
2"d
way.
This
original
document
is on
acetate film,
the
hand
writing
is
my
mother's,
done
with
a speciai
pen,
where
after this document is registered,
is
then
dipped in
acid,
and
the
writing
is actually
transparent,
in order
that
no
one can alter or forge
this
document.
ln
99.999% of
the
time,
the
whole
document
is dipped
at
the
same
time,
and
a
Red
Seal
is/was added, and in
this
way
this baby
became this bond issue
[a
Warehouse
Receipt],
which
gave
the
government
[at
that
time] a million
dollars,
in return
for
the
bondholder
[UCC
/the
Pope] to be entitled to
the
entire
earnings /output
created
by
this
indentured slave status, for
the
rest
of their
life.
IN
MY
CASE,
because my father
signed
this
commission
resulted
where
[in
Jan 1952]
only the right
side was dipped
in
acid.
Then,
the King
died
a
few
weeks later. AND
this
document
was
in
estopple
for
38
years.
The
left side
was cast
in
Jan 1
sth,
'1989.
This dipping
was
done
so
that
it's impossible to
forge
or alter this title
document
later.
1.
On the filigree
of this Statement
/bond:
This
is a very ancient
way to
designate
[in
this casel
the
bounty /wealth
of
the
Commonwealth that
was
in trust
with
King
George
Vl
[for
his loyal
subjects]
that were symbolically
upheld
by the Stone of Destiny,
which
is heavily
attached
to
Sumerian, Christian, Jewish
and
Celtic
lore.
This
Sumerian
twisted
logic
is the foundation
for
Rom
3:
'what
if
we
do evil,
so
that
good
can result?'
2.
This
filigree
was
replaced
with
boxes
in
Queen
Elizabeth's
reign, because
the
King's
coffers
were
robbed by
this
war debt,
by
being responsible
for
the
damages incurred
by the
winning and losing sides
of the
war. Upon his
death,
resulted
where
the
Pope
/UCC thru at-large bankers robbed
the
Commonwealth's
trust,
by
fully
implementing
this truly
evil ancient Sumerian
slavery
racket called:
WAREHOUSE
RECEIPTS.
3.
Because of
my father's commission, my Statement has all kinds
of odd markings
to it.
LIKE :
The
solid line that
was
drawn-in
[at
the
top
of
the
right
side,
on the
front
face].
When
it
was
cast,
it
designated that this statement or bond is on solid
ground.
The
line under
BOYER is
also underlined,
meaning my
father's
trust
is on
solid
ground.
4. On this title
document,
my
UCC
file
# is:
113270, and
[on
the
backside]
this
Ontario
Registry
#
88-361731
was
added
in
1
988,
and
it's
purposely placed
above
the
Crest.
ION
THIS]
Had
i
said
'yes'to
this
question
of: 'do
you
want a Birth
Certificate', this
#
would've
been
directly
under Despina
Georgas'thumb,
just
like my Birth #
000665
is
directly under the registrais signature. Had
i
fallen for this same trap of
saying
'yes',
[in
Dec.
1988] my
bonci
would
have been seized to
pay
the war debi,
because my
#
88-36'1731
would
have
been
directly
under
this
registrar's
signature.
But,
it's not.
5.
Now,
because my
father
had this
trust, is
why this # is above
the
Queen,
and
this
automatically
created
2
quirks:
(1)
i did
not
get
any Seal,
(2)
this Special
Notice
saying
that this
statement
is not a registration,
[therefore]
it is a hereditary entitlement.
1.
Now,
when
you
look
atthe
BOND lay-up,
This
# 88-361731
is above
this
UCC
#,
where the ancient
term of:
being
:r ihe r-rlre,'
:-.
cle;-i.r
h=
.9
=x:ress:i
;.:._
8/19/2019 9 PDF Warehouse
6/8
2.
Had i been under Despina's
thumb, this #
would
have
been
taken
as a death
certificate being issued,
by this
# being in the
medical
practices
box. But,
it's
not.
1. This
is why
it's a crime
of FRAUD
to
press
on
me, an all capitals
legal entity.
3. What cannot be mis'taken'
[here]
is
that this
#
000665 is now
in
the
Seal section,
which clearly entitles me
to
1-share
of the
value
of my King's
Commonwealth bond.
4.
NOW COMES THE BIG
QUIRK:
[because
i
said 'no', resulted with] The
#
37300
being added twice
[in
1989],
and
this
is
a California
Law
called:
Title to
property
while on
water.
I
did
not land
in
Ontario,
i'm somehow
now landed in
California,
and
my
[inheritance]
is now
this title bond to 1-share
of
the
Commonwealth's
wealth.
5.
The adding
of
this
#
37300 marking, means everyone
who trampled
on me for
the
last
decade
is
guilty
of
breaking
this
really
ancient
trust.
AND,
1O-years
later,
i
get
invited to Civilly open
this file, where
the
charge
of FRAUD must
be dealt with.
1. Today,
it's called
FRAUD, for depriving me
of this title
to
be fairly
treated
under
common
law
-
Sec
340 CC
FRAUD.
Destroying
documents of
title. Every one
who,
for a
fraudulent
purpose,
destroys,
cancels,
conceals
or obliterates
(a)
a
document
of
title
to
goods or lands, (b)
a
valuable security
or
testamentary instrument,
or
(c)
a
judicial
or official document, is
guilty
of an indictable
offence
and liable to
imprisonment for
a
term not exceeding
ten
years.
[under
absotute
trust
liability
=
guilty]
6. ON
THIS:
When the
Queen's
registry, defaced my Statement
with
this
#37300, in
1989
is
not
fraud;
these abnormalities
are actually
prescribed
by UCC law, and
exceptionally
rare.
1. lN HINDSIGHT:
This FRAUD
originally
occuned,
when
Wally Oppal
committed the
crime of
the
millennium,
by authorizing
the
BAR
to
commit FRAUD,
in order
to
entrap
me to
get
a PERSON,
and that way
this
now 83 file thick
dossier that
was created, in
2OO4 12005
could
just
be closed, because somehow
my bond
had been
cashed
in.
2. ln
twisted
UCC logic,
it's as if i did this ten
year
sentence.
Frankly,
most of
the
abuse
that
occurred
in
the
last
decade, had
to
occur,
BUT under respondeat
Superior
some
one must be made
accountable
forthis
abuse.
AND
this
can
be
done,
by
recognizing
that
their
is
a real value
to
this
BOND, at this
first
appearance,
and
proceed
accordingly.
7. AS WE SEE lt This
fiduciary trust violation
falls
on who
ever
holds
the Office
of
this
paper
Queen of
Canada;
[since
the
Charter]
the
trust
is now on Marc
Mayrand,
and he
is also holding
the
Canadian BAR's trust
account.
AND
if
i'm wrong
then,
the
Crown is duty bound
to
press
[who
ever holds
this trust]
to appear at the
first
appearance,
or at least make
themselves
be known who
they are
[for
the
record]
lN
CONCLUSION:
What
should be noted
is THAT:
the abnormalities
on my
statement
are
[by intent]
exiremely
rare, because there's
this
big red seal
that
hides
this
UCC
bond
number.
AND,
because She violated this
ancient
trust
means: We
are entitled to
seize
Her certificates.
1. Frankly,
there
were
so few
such bonds issued
in
the
first
place,
and there
were
so
many traps to
get
thru
-
THIS
MEANS THAT: 64
years
after
this
bond
issue
was
closed
that
we
can claim
to
hold
the
only
real bearer
share
left, and
this means
that:
the
UCC,
or
the
Crown, or
the
BAR are
now
placed
with
the
onus
to
prove
otherwise.
AND
1. Frankly,
the one
responsible
for
holding
this
information is
Marc Mayrand,
and his
clerk lves
Cote,
who
happen to be attached to this
Petition from
the
BAR.
2. Mr. Buhler is representing
their
interests
in this
court,
and
under
Sec 337 CC, they
must deliver
this
information
/statistic, at this 1"r appearance.
Act accordingly.
8/19/2019 9 PDF Warehouse
7/8
8/19/2019 9 PDF Warehouse
8/8
.'=J'- 3b/71/
-/
i
1...
*r--'
0{}08f;5
Top Related