9 PDF Warehouse

8/19/2019 9 PDF Warehouse

1/8

Sr*ourili

Jan

15, 2016

Between:

And:

83

THE LAW SOCIETY

OF

BRITISH

COLUMBIA

Marc Pierre

Boyer

RESPONSE

TO PETITION

Petitioner

Respondent

Filed by :

Marc Pierre

Boyer

acting under

our disiricts'fiduciary

trust

as

CFA

for

several Marijuana Party Elecioral

Disirict

Associaiions

[EDA]

4-858 East

6rh Ave. Vancouver

BC,

VST

1M1

[EDA

headquarters]

THIS lS

A

RESPONSE TO

the

petition

filed

BY

The Law

Society of

British

Columbia

845 Cambie

Street,

Vancouver,

BC,

V6B 4Zg

Petitioner'sLawyer

MichealKleisinger

The Law

Society of

British

Columbia

845 Cambie Street,

Vancouver

BC, V6B

429

Part

1: ORDERS CONSENTED

TO:

As expressed

in

the attached

PROTEST

Synopsis

of Part 1: Marc

Boyer asked for and would

like to consent

to

proceed

with

responding to

points

1 thru

4

of

this Petition

/case.

But,

Iwon't

consent

to

be mistaken

by

this

pedantic trap to consent to being an all capitals

ENTITY.

A basic understanding

can

be

established

at

this

First

Appearance,

in

order

to

proceed

properly,

by

this

court

addressing the following

courses, NAMELY:

1)

Declared

that all assumptions

of holding

special recognition are dismissed,

or

(2)

Rule that my

bond has

a

face value

that

needs

to be

established

[for

example] under

the

PPSA;

[8y

pro

ceeding

under

another Act?j

Part 2: ORDERS

OPPOSED:

We

oppose the

granting

of any order that

the BAR desires

to

implement in

points

1 thru 4

of this

Petition.

As we see

it,

we have been

extended 21 days

[as

you

call

it]

from the date served

to submit a challenge

to

points

1

thru 4,

and we will be

flling

a

detailed response Petition,

in order to

proceed

with

addressing our

general

position

of:

there

is

no authority

in

any otherAct to

subvert the Supremacy

of the

Canada

Elections Act.

Part 3: ORDERS

ON

WHICH

NO POSITION

lS

TAKEN:

The

facts contained

in the

Affidavits

are

good

enough

to file

a

factual

basis, a legal basis, and materials

to

be relied

on to contest

our claim

that

no

Act

can subvert

the

Act.

As we see

it,

no

paper

queen

can commit

sedition

by

assuming that the BAR must

defend this trust

violation,

because there's

this omission

of

an

allegiance to

preclude

you

from obeying

orders that destroy

Canada and the

Commonwealth,

in

order to conform to this

paper

queen's

desire to ignore

an oath taken on a

plastic

Stone.

1.

AS

we see

if.'

we are

not contesting the estimated

2-hour timeline to

settle

this

132-

page

Petition. BECAUSE

we agree that our PROTEST

can be ruled

on,

in

this time-

frame;

in

this

way,

proceed

to

a

date set io appear on this

protest,

contained

in Part

1.

THE

LAW

SOCIETY

OF

B.C,


2/8

Jan

15,2016

Between:

And:

RE:

File l{o:

S-

15107

Vancouver

Registry

ln the Supreme

Court

of

British Columbia

THE

LAW

SOCIETY OF BRITISH

GOLUMBIA

Petitionen

Marc Pierre

Boyer Respondent

RESPONSE TO PETITIOIS

83

Part

1:

DENIAL

OF CONSENT

TO

grant

orders set out in this

following

PROTEST

in order

to revolve

an

Essential Element of

Law at

this

first Appearance

UNDER

PROTEST

This application

was

initiated

with

a letter

from

Mr Kleisinger addressing

a

common

law complaint

against

Marc Boyer dated July 30,

2015,lp-3

-Ms

Souvage Affidavitl

AND this

PETITION

-

S-15197

83

is

filing an action

against MARC

PIERRE BOYER, when

the BAR

is barred

from

giving

me this

straw man,

because

this lnstitution

knows that creating

this legal

entity

is

directly forbidden

in

Law, because it's

a

violation of

Sec 336

CC

-

FRAUD

Appendix

A offers

a

detailed

account of these abnormalities of

my abnormal birth

1.

By definition: the main reason

Marc

Boyer holds a criminal

record is due

to

this original

violation

of creating

this

all

capitals entity.

Frankly,

the

primary

function

for Sec 336

CC

and Sec

337 CC existing

is

because

your

Sumerian lore warns

of dire consequences,

for violating this trust that will

lead

to

answering

the

question

contained in

lCor

4:20

NAMELY:

Does

Authority again

desire

on engaging

the merciless

end of this civilization

/age

flike

Nineveh

did],

when challenged by

the

one

with the abnormal

birth

[of

1Cor15]

2.

With this

Petition, we come full circle

as

to

why

this

[attached]

gag

order was created

in

the

first

place

NAMELY: This

trust was

violated

by

Attorney General

Wally Oppal,

in

2004 12005,

who under

Sec 8

CC

Territories Act terminology:

raped me

a of

my

private

individual landed

rights. Due

to

my

abnormal birth right,

authority

is

directly forbidden

to create

flet

alone imprisonl

this all capitals

entity.

THEREFORE,

since the BAR

initiated this action means

i

can

now civilly

protest

this act

in

this

proceeding,

in order

to recognize my

claim

to the face value of my bond, so

that

good

first-fruit can occur.

3.

This decade

old

gag

order barred me from

pressing

the inevitability

of

having

to

settle

this case civilly,

which

resulted

in

your

criminal Code acting like

i

must be assimilated

or destroyed,

on

a

pedantic

assumption that without a lawyer

i

did

not know any

better.

This Civil

proceeding

must

address

this systemic abuse of my common

law

guarantees

4. As

we see

If, that's why

this Petition implies

a

few times that

just

because

being

found

guilty

under

the

criminal

Court

jurisdiction,

does not

necessarily

mean

that i can

be

assumed

to be found

guilty

in

this Civil

proceeding

where ijust

might

get'a

yes'.

ON

TFIIS: I'm

certain that

i

have friends in High

places

of

authority

that actually act

as

if on my

side;

otherurise

appearances

like this

civil solution would

never have

been

pressed.

Therefore,

ithank

all

those who

are making

this civil court daie

possibi:.


3/8

|

.:-..1,

Novdinb'er.27.

20f5

I1._,,

r

')

1

:',,-

MoTIoN

oN REPEALING

MARC

BoYER.S

GAG

oRDEi]J-:.-.:.--

,..

r

rl

.,

.

- -

^1-;

-

Ba-ck

in

?SQt;^tYt.arc

Boyer

was

served

a

gag

order

by

the

head

registrar

of

the

Civil

Registry

-.

.

.

called

l\r-4r.

Messenger

This

gag

order

came from filing

one

dccu 'nent that he

called

',,exat ous,

-

-"

dnd'oiigihirlly

his

gag

order

only

applied

to the civil

registry

and it now

applies

to

the criminal

registry

as

well,

because

i

keep

bringing

up

the

thorny issue

that

this court now faces again.

Except now it's

far

worse than

when

i started, and

it

can never

get

better without

someone

like

me

going

the distance

in

spiie

of

the huge

obstacles,

because if

i

don't, then who

will?

2.

ln this new case, the BAR

now

wants to

stop

me

frcm

acting like a lawyer

in a

criminal

matter,

when I'm acting

like a barrister,

who

is

defending

the

issue of

no

jurisdiction

at

the

arraignment.

[ON

THISI: Criminal

charges

are not

a

criminal matter until after the arraignment.

'1.

At

face

value:

With

this common law

motion

filed

by

the BAR,

we

have

done a

full circle;

by

this

i mean, we're

back to the original reason for this

decade old

gag

order,

except

worse;

where the

BAR

wants exclusivity

to

represent

anyone

in

any

phase

of

a

court

proceeding,

in order

to

bar

anyone like

me

from making a common

law defence because

i

know

and act on benefiting

from

the

Achilles heal that the

minutes of this vote exposed.

3.

The

larger issue

at

stake

in

this

case

is

that

after

22

years of every one associated

with

the

BAR

[ike]

law enforcement

officers are

prohibited

from

being

a common

law Peace Officer and

every lawyer has been

prohibited

from defending any

common law application in

a

criminal

matter, which

has resulted where

all Canadian

common

law rights and

Freedoms have been

systematically

gutted

by

lawyers

[in

1993] and enforced under

under Civilian Oversight

[1998]

4.

[at

face

value]

lN

THIS GASE,

of relying on

the mountain

of statutory

limitation

placed

on our

Free

and Democratic society

lunder

R

v Oakes] means the fact

remains that when no one can

defend

common

law,

results

where the BAR

is

entrenched on destroying

democratic freedom

by insisting that

theiiAct

supersedes

the Act,

which

plays

hand in hand with

NATO

passing

/

implementing

this

sedition

Aci called S-55 of the CDSA, which

[by

virtue

of

the

fact that it came

from

Royal ascentl,

results

where all BAR member can

actually engage

in

vanquishing

all its

disadvantaged

Canadians

by

causing the total decimalion

of all human rights

known to man,

because

a

faceless paper queen

called

governor

in

council

said

so.

But then

Pierre

Trudeau

called

our

present

culmination

of this

grand

plan:

'14

shorf te

rm

pain

for

a

long

term

gain"

5.

lf anyone

cares

to

take

note:

Unders-2of

S55of

theCDSAall

Public Safety will be handed

over

to NATO under anotherAct

tabled this time

by

Justin

Trudeau, with his

majority

will

pass

the full

implementation of

this seditious act of

omission

in

the next Throne Speach,

[note:

s-2,1]

"withoui

restricting

the

generality

of

the

foregaing"

After

this, NATO Federal Courts can

now

tell

Parliament

that

it

holds sole 'across

the

board'

jurisdiction

over Public Safety

in

Canada.

1.

So

the

cast

is

set,

so

this new

Zionist loving

Prime

Minister

[at

face value]

can

take that

giant

step

of

totally abandoning

our Sovereignty over

to

NATO

is almost

a

fait accomplie;

2.

EXCEPT FOR THE

FACT THAT Constitutional law

under the SCC

is

still

Supreme

in

Canada, and

a

bencher

flike

i'm facing

in

this BAR

chargel is

ciught

in a

trap

of

serving

two

masters, and must make a

choice.

NAMELY:

Will this

judge rebel

by

submitting

to

this

sedition

[OR]

will

the BCSC benchers rebel and

side

with the SCC as being Supreme?

6.

Frankly,

all

we cai do is

place

our

faith

in God, because

the fate of men

in

Canada becoming

a

banana

republic

in

their demonic

New World Order is held

by

two

or

three witnesses, in

an

insignificant

side

ruling in

a

case where

the

messenger will either be denied

the

right

to uphold

the

law as

Supreme

in

order to

protect

the flduciary trust

to Canadian Sovereignty

as

Supreme.

'1

.

SO MAKE

A

CHOICE: As we

understand

it,

this bencher will either obey

a

Sec 126(2) CC

interference

by

the

new

Attorney

General

or

the conscience

of

the Minister

of Justice, and

this choice is held

by

this new

player

on the

scene,

NAMELY:

Jody Wilson

Rayborn


4/8

7. In

1996, she

divorced me

shortly

and

after being

diagnosed

with

lymphoma,

i

returned

to

Canada

This

angel

told

me

to

go

to

BC,

where

iwould

be

needed

later

on

Nov

13,

1999,

icrossed

the

border,

and i

then

got

my

flrst

and

only flu-shot,

which

kicked

my

lymphoma

into

full

gear.

On

the evening

of 9/11,

i had

a very

lucid

dream,

where

i

was

told

the

recipe

to

make

my

remarcable

Soma cookies,

in order

to

cure my

ever

increasing

cancer

pains,

and

to

run with

it.

8.

At that

time,

i made myself

a royal

pain

at City

Hall, in order

to

have

my

landed

on

land

in

Canada

status

be

established, and

to

pursue

a

common law

defence,

under

the Marijuana

party.

I

was

eventually charged

for

protesting

too

aggressively

at

city

Hall

in

Jan

Sih,2oo4,

and

then

in

sept

28th,2004,

for

operating a

commercial

premise

known as

the Vancouver

East Marijuana

Party

Headquarters,

where

at

the

Arraignment

in

November 1Oth

2004,

i

got

the

charges

dropped,

and

i

was

to

appear in

a

week

to file for

damages, because

i

filed

this

17-page

article entitled

NOTICE

OF

DENIAL

OF

CONSENTTO

BE GOVERNED,

and

that

evening

my

chest

ptate

was

snapped

in

2,

by two VPD

duty

Sargents,

and

that

morning idied,

and

had

a

face to

face

contact

with

this

angel

[as

if in

a

white

cloud]

that i met

when

iwas

13

[on

this]

my

father was

54, and

i was

now

54,

and

this

angel looked.just

like

me;

At

the

end of

this

meeting,

i

was swallowed

by

the

heart of

the

earth,

[for

lack of any other

term

to

explain it]

and returned

with

this

partial

mended

broken

chest

plate.

A

few

days later,

I

went to VGH,

where

i

got

X-rays

that

showed

the

fracture

was

real.

SIDE BAR

[in hindsight] this event signalled Daniel 8:14, because

2300 mornings

later, the

tidal

wave

that struck Fukushima

hit,

where

[for

at

least

a week

before]

i clearly

warned

authority

with a

Get

Well

Soon card that

something

big

was

aboui

to

happen

on

that day.

1.

I

reported

this

broken chest

incident

at my next

court

appearance,

and

as

to

instructions

given

at

this

1st

arraignment,

i boldly filed

this

priceless

gift

from

God

/damage

award

that

is

actually

still a default

judgment,

yet

swept away and

destroyed

by

Wally

Oppal.

[Sec

340

FRAUD].

9.

I ihen filed

a

legal

paper

trap

with

Revenue

Canadd,

which

gave

me

a

great

civil

defence

that

took

..

4

months

to

set-up. i

flled

a Petition

to

have

this

criminal

case

file

dealt

with

civilly.

.Eollowing

this

1"r appearance

[where

i

got

what i catl

my court

victory]

i was

slapped

with

this

gag

order.

10.

At this criminal

trial

[on

this Party

Headquarters

charges]

a

miraculous

twist

in

fate

happened,

where

my

senlence was

read

the

day

after

the

Election

Writ dropped,

and

point

7 now

made

an

erroneous claim

that

i

was

mis'taken'

to

believe that

the

Elections

Act

offered

me

any immunity.

1.

ON

THIS:

Without

this

quirk,

i could

never have

a chance

to

add

a

trust challenge

[by

means

of a

caveat

to

my candidacyl

that

caused JP Kingsley,

his

clerk,

and

the

chief

Justice

to

resign

in

laie

December

2005,

over a fiduciary

trust

violation

that

i set up

in this

trap

/caveat.

11 . I

rekindled

the issue

of

getting

the

$1000.

deposit returned

this

spring, for

the 2004/05

election.

and

in order

to

comply

with

their

prescribed

paperwork,

i

filed

all

the

proper

articles

to

get

this

deposit

back.

The

flle was

cleared

for

payment

after

being scrutinized,

and

filed

on

time

by our

Party's

auditor.

As

to

Elections Canada's original estimate, we

should have

received

this

iheck,

before

the

new

election

campaign

started. They

knew

that

iwas

going

to

court

with

or

without

this

check,

and

since

Mr Buhler

has added

this case

that involves

lves

Coie,

actually

means,

i can

have

this court rule

on

ihis

check,

because

we

see

it

as

an

essential

element

inihis

Civil

Claim.

''I

i

,r'ri

ll

,

i)

,

,r

ir:.ii),r,r'li)r'i.tir,lli,irJrr:,

'|

l

"

,

I l| ili[ l],,|{r:ri,i

Marc

Pierre

Boyer

i'

i\.)a.r:itrtilrl..

ll{'flit

lrliil:li

laa':iifl,'.

i

j'.

r-:

ill

lirJlrri''


5/8

APPENDIX

A:

On

outiining

the irnportar:ce

of this

Birti'r Statenrent

/bond issue

Oi{

OUTLIS{iNG

SPECIFIC

ABhIORMALITIES

IN MY

ABhIORMAL

BIRTH

STATEMENT.

FREF,ACE:

in

the attached copy,

i

printed

a

back

to

back

copy,

just

like my

original etched

short form,

which is

part

of a long form regisky that is actualiy

like how i iaid-up

the

2"d

way.

This

original

document

is on

acetate film,

the

hand

writing

is

my

mother's,

done

with

a speciai

pen,

where

after this document is registered,

is

then

dipped in

acid,

and

the

writing

is actually

transparent,

in order

that

no

one can alter or forge

this

document.

ln

99.999% of

the

time,

the

whole

document

is dipped

at

the

same

time,

and

a

Red

Seal

is/was added, and in

this

way

this baby

became this bond issue

[a

Warehouse

Receipt],

which

gave

the

government

[at

that

time] a million

dollars,

in return

for

the

bondholder

[UCC

/the

Pope] to be entitled to

the

entire

earnings /output

created

by

this

indentured slave status, for

the

rest

of their

life.

IN

MY

CASE,

because my father

signed

this

commission

resulted

where

[in

Jan 1952]

only the right

side was dipped

in

acid.

Then,

the King

died

a

few

weeks later. AND

this

document

was

in

estopple

for

38

years.

The

left side

was cast

in

Jan 1

sth,

'1989.

This dipping

was

done

so

that

it's impossible to

forge

or alter this title

document

later.

1.

On the filigree

of this Statement

/bond:

This

is a very ancient

way to

designate

[in

this casel

the

bounty /wealth

of

the

Commonwealth that

was

in trust

with

King

George

Vl

[for

his loyal

subjects]

that were symbolically

upheld

by the Stone of Destiny,

which

is heavily

attached

to

Sumerian, Christian, Jewish

and

Celtic

lore.

This

Sumerian

twisted

logic

is the foundation

for

Rom

3:

'what

if

we

do evil,

so

that

good

can result?'

2.

This

filigree

was

replaced

with

boxes

in

Queen

Elizabeth's

reign, because

the

King's

coffers

were

robbed by

this

war debt,

by

being responsible

for

the

damages incurred

by the

winning and losing sides

of the

war. Upon his

death,

resulted

where

the

Pope

/UCC thru at-large bankers robbed

the

Commonwealth's

trust,

by

fully

implementing

this truly

evil ancient Sumerian

slavery

racket called:

WAREHOUSE

RECEIPTS.

3.

Because of

my father's commission, my Statement has all kinds

of odd markings

to it.

LIKE :

The

solid line that

was

drawn-in

[at

the

top

of

the

right

side,

on the

front

face].

When

it

was

cast,

it

designated that this statement or bond is on solid

ground.

The

line under

BOYER is

also underlined,

meaning my

father's

trust

is on

solid

ground.

4. On this title

document,

my

UCC

file

# is:

113270, and

[on

the

backside]

this

Ontario

Registry

#

88-361731

was

added

in

1

988,

and

it's

purposely placed

above

the

Crest.

ION

THIS]

Had

i

said

'yes'to

this

question

of: 'do

you

want a Birth

Certificate', this

#

would've

been

directly

under Despina

Georgas'thumb,

just

like my Birth #

000665

is

directly under the registrais signature. Had

i

fallen for this same trap of

saying

'yes',

[in

Dec.

1988] my

bonci

would

have been seized to

pay

the war debi,

because my

#

88-36'1731

would

have

been

directly

under

this

registrar's

signature.

But,

it's not.

5.

Now,

because my

father

had this

trust, is

why this # is above

the

Queen,

and

this

automatically

created

2

quirks:

(1)

i did

not

get

any Seal,

(2)

this Special

Notice

saying

that this

statement

is not a registration,

[therefore]

it is a hereditary entitlement.

1.

Now,

when

you

look

atthe

BOND lay-up,

This

# 88-361731

is above

this

UCC

#,

where the ancient

term of:

being

:r ihe r-rlre,'

:-.

cle;-i.r

h=

.9

=x:ress:i

;.:._


6/8

2.

Had i been under Despina's

thumb, this #

would

have

been

taken

as a death

certificate being issued,

by this

# being in the

medical

practices

box. But,

it's

not.

1. This

is why

it's a crime

of FRAUD

to

press

on

me, an all capitals

legal entity.

3. What cannot be mis'taken'

[here]

is

that this

#

000665 is now

in

the

Seal section,

which clearly entitles me

to

1-share

of the

value

of my King's

Commonwealth bond.

4.

NOW COMES THE BIG

QUIRK:

[because

i

said 'no', resulted with] The

#

37300

being added twice

[in

1989],

and

this

is

a California

Law

called:

Title to

property

while on

water.

I

did

not land

in

Ontario,

i'm somehow

now landed in

California,

and

my

[inheritance]

is now

this title bond to 1-share

of

the

Commonwealth's

wealth.

5.

The adding

of

this

#

37300 marking, means everyone

who trampled

on me for

the

last

decade

is

guilty

of

breaking

this

really

ancient

trust.

AND,

1O-years

later,

i

get

invited to Civilly open

this file, where

the

charge

of FRAUD must

be dealt with.

1. Today,

it's called

FRAUD, for depriving me

of this title

to

be fairly

treated

under

common

law

-

Sec

340 CC

FRAUD.

Destroying

documents of

title. Every one

who,

for a

fraudulent

purpose,

destroys,

cancels,

conceals

or obliterates

(a)

a

document

of

title

to

goods or lands, (b)

a

valuable security

or

testamentary instrument,

or

(c)

a

judicial

or official document, is

guilty

of an indictable

offence

and liable to

imprisonment for

a

term not exceeding

ten

years.

[under

absotute

trust

liability

=

guilty]

6. ON

THIS:

When the

Queen's

registry, defaced my Statement

with

this

#37300, in

1989

is

not

fraud;

these abnormalities

are actually

prescribed

by UCC law, and

exceptionally

rare.

1. lN HINDSIGHT:

This FRAUD

originally

occuned,

when

Wally Oppal

committed the

crime of

the

millennium,

by authorizing

the

BAR

to

commit FRAUD,

in order

to

entrap

me to

get

a PERSON,

and that way

this

now 83 file thick

dossier that

was created, in

2OO4 12005

could

just

be closed, because somehow

my bond

had been

cashed

in.

2. ln

twisted

UCC logic,

it's as if i did this ten

year

sentence.

Frankly,

most of

the

abuse

that

occurred

in

the

last

decade, had

to

occur,

BUT under respondeat

Superior

some

one must be made

accountable

forthis

abuse.

AND

this

can

be

done,

by

recognizing

that

their

is

a real value

to

this

BOND, at this

first

appearance,

and

proceed

accordingly.

7. AS WE SEE lt This

fiduciary trust violation

falls

on who

ever

holds

the Office

of

this

paper

Queen of

Canada;

[since

the

Charter]

the

trust

is now on Marc

Mayrand,

and he

is also holding

the

Canadian BAR's trust

account.

AND

if

i'm wrong

then,

the

Crown is duty bound

to

press

[who

ever holds

this trust]

to appear at the

first

appearance,

or at least make

themselves

be known who

they are

[for

the

record]

lN

CONCLUSION:

What

should be noted

is THAT:

the abnormalities

on my

statement

are

[by intent]

exiremely

rare, because there's

this

big red seal

that

hides

this

UCC

bond

number.

AND,

because She violated this

ancient

trust

means: We

are entitled to

seize

Her certificates.

1. Frankly,

there

were

so few

such bonds issued

in

the

first

place,

and there

were

so

many traps to

get

thru

-

THIS

MEANS THAT: 64

years

after

this

bond

issue

was

closed

that

we

can claim

to

hold

the

only

real bearer

share

left, and

this means

that:

the

UCC,

or

the

Crown, or

the

BAR are

now

placed

with

the

onus

to

prove

otherwise.

AND

1. Frankly,

the one

responsible

for

holding

this

information is

Marc Mayrand,

and his

clerk lves

Cote,

who

happen to be attached to this

Petition from

the

BAR.

2. Mr. Buhler is representing

their

interests

in this

court,

and

under

Sec 337 CC, they

must deliver

this

information

/statistic, at this 1"r appearance.

Act accordingly.


7/8


8/8

.'=J'- 3b/71/

-/

i

1...

*r--'

0{}08f;5

9 PDF Warehouse

Documents

Transcript of 9 PDF Warehouse