ZERO TOLERANCE Safe Schools Issues in Discipline of Special Education and All Students Prepared and...
-
Upload
virginia-osborne -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of ZERO TOLERANCE Safe Schools Issues in Discipline of Special Education and All Students Prepared and...
ZERO TOLERANCE
Safe Schools Issues in Discipline of Special Education and All Students
Prepared and Presented by Ilene Young, EsquireYoung Law OfficesDoylestown, PA
Case study: John
15 year old student in all mainstream classes Dx ADHD and PDD IEP from grade 2 History of behavioral problems Documented hatred of school Current IEP with social and behavioral goals
related to stress and conflict avoidance
Triggering Incident
April 23, 1999, three days after Columbine A student reports that John asked him to join
a club dedicated to hating another student “Columbine was cool” “Where can I get get
guns “on the black market””.
Case study: Issues
Reporting and punishment requirements under safe schools/zero tolerance laws
Discipline of special education students Subjective determinations of violations Appropriate behavioral interventions Extreme consequences if you decide
the wrong way
Case study result
John was placed on homebound instruction for the remaining 22 day balance of the school year
John’s parents were awarded compensatory education and reimbursement for counseling services they obtained for John because of his treatment by the district
Community Consolidated School District #93 v John F., No. 00 CV 1347 (7th Cir. 2000)
What is Zero Tolerance?
Originally a child of the Federal Drug Enforcement policies of the 1980s
Policies that punish all offenses, however minor
Zero tolerance in schools
Strictly enforced mandatory consequences for violations of school rules
Legally imposed obligations on school districts to adhere to a schedule of violations and consequences and report to a central information office
Mandatory involvement of law enforcement in certain school discipline matters
Three aspects of discipline addressed by courts
RULE
VIOLATION
RESPONSE
Rule
Legitimate purpose Rational relationship to the
achievement of that purpose Sufficiently narrow and clear Written and publicized to
students If infringes on a fundamental
right, compelling state interest
ZT policies have repeatedly been found to serve the legitimate interest of safety.
Violation
May be clear cut and unequivocal
May be subjective Timeframe for
determination may be relevant
Zero tolerance creates a lack of flexibility
Response
In Zero Tolerance, once the determination of violation is made, zero flexibility may exist
Trigger for most lawsuits and appeals under zero tolerance
Trigger for most perception of injustice
IDEA and Zero Tolerance
Primary goal of IDEA: to eliminate exclusion of children with disabilities from education
– “Prevention of speculative and subjective decision-making.” Mills v Board of Ed of D.C., (1972)
Iissues arise over suspensions which constitute a change of placement A district can remove a special education student from his current
placement for up to 10 days A district can remove a special education student from current
placement for up to 45 school days if it has clear and convincing evidence that the student: possessed a weapon, as defined by law, at school; possessed illegal drugs at school; or inflicted serious bodily injury at school or at a school-related function.
IDEA Discipline Provisions
Discipline rules are exceptions to the general requirement that a child remain in her current placement pending due process and subsequent proceedings.– Working with the parent to reach agreement as to
an appropriate placement is always the first option.
– IDEA requires proactive approaches to behavior management.
1997 Amendments and IDEIA
Have increased flexibility for districts to deal with discipline of children with special needs
Fundamental requirements of – proactive identification – behavior plans– appropriate staff development – safeguards to prevent exclusion based upon
disability are still in place
Goals of discipline of special education students
Preserving school safety Promoting appropriate behavioral
interventions and responding appropriately to behaviors
Increasing the likelihood of success in school
Increasing school completion for at risk students
Avoiding exclusion for manifestations of disabilities
Protecting rights of students and staff.
Goals of zero tolerance laws
Maintenance of safe schools and the perception of safety in schools.
Codification of behavioral rules and responses
Expulsion and/or exclusion of students in violation of school rules
Referral to law enforcement and data collection
Hierarchy of zero tolerance
First level: Federal Law– THE GUN FREE SCHOOLS ACT
Second level: State Law (PA)– Safe Schools Act
ACT 26 (as amended)
Third level: LEA:– School policy/student
handbook
Law Enforcement -memorandum of understanding
GFSA: Requirements for State DOE
A Law requiring one year expulsion for weapons infraction
Case by Case modification available to CAO (Chief Administrative Officer) of the LEA
Annual reporting to DOE (Department of Education) concerning compliance data and expulsion data.
GFSA: Requirements for LEA (District)
Policy requiring the referral to the criminal justice system of any student who brings a firearm to school
GFSA must be construed and administered in a manner consistent with the IDEA
Case by case exception must be written policy and specifically may include children with disabilities within case by case considerations.
NCLB and GFSA
Chief administrative officer of LEA must develop a written record of any case by case modifications of the one-year expulsion requirement
GFSA does not apply to a firearm lawfully stored in a locked vehicle on school property or for activities approved by the LEA.
Data is used for safe school status determinations
Private schools and GFSA
Private schools are not subject to the provisions of the GFSA
Private school students who participate in LEA programs are, to the extent that such students are under the supervision and control of the LEA.
Reporting Requirements: GFSA
Compliance Circumstances surrounding any expulsions
imposed Number of students Types of firearms LEA’s are required to provide descriptive
data to the SEA
Definitions under GFSA
FIREARM DEFINITION: at 18 U.S.C. 921– Specifically excludes antiques and replicas– Excludes Fireworks and knives
CAO DEFINITION: undefined. To be determined by the SEA
Expulsion Definition:– Removal from the student’s regular education program.
Placement in another regular program is not permitted. Placement in an alternative setting is permitted
SAFE SCHOOLS ACT: ACT 26
– Expulsion– Reporting– Cooperation with Law Enforcement
Provisions of the Safe Schools Act
Mandatory Expulsion Reporting
– By LEA: weapons offenses to law enforcement– weapons and acts of violence to state DOE– By parent: Sworn statement
Maintenance of Records Cooperation with Local Law Enforcement Entities
– Memorandum of Understanding
ACTS OF VIOLENCE
Violence and weapon possession incident collection form includes:– Harassment– Terroristic Threats– Recklessly endangering
DETERMINING “ACTS OF VIOLENCE” DOE Scenario 1.
During a shouting match between two 2nd grade students, Student A pushes Student B off of the top of a sliding board. Student B lands on her back and has a bruise on her hip the next morning. Is this assault?
What if they are 5th grade students? What is the anticipated result of following the
memorandum of understanding/zt policy?
Scenario 2: Harassment
Everyday, Student A shouts words to Student B referring to his disability so that everyone can hear. Student A also belittles anyone who dares to sit with Student B, so that he sits alone. Student A has been cautioned by the administration to stop this behavior but has not. Is this harassment?
Parental Registration and Rights Concerning Records
Prior to admission to school, a parent must sign a statement stating whether the student was or is suspended or expelled from any school in any state for z.t. offenses.
A certified copy of the student’s disciplinary record is transmitted to the school to which the student may transfers.
Parental permission is not required for transfer.
Cases on definitions:WEAPON :
Bodily Injury: In the Interest of M.H. M, a minor APPEAL of M.H.M., 2004 PA Super 485 (2004) Held: Despite having been designed specifically not to cause bodily injury, a paintball gun is a weapon.
Cases on Definitions: Possession
“On School Grounds”: J.M. v Webster County Board of Education, ___ S.E.2d __ (W.V. 2000)
HELD: Expulsion of student for possession of a weapon on school grounds upheld even though the court accepted as fact that the student had been transported onto school grounds forcibly by another and had neither intended to be nor taken any voluntary action toward being, on school grounds.
POSSESSION/ KNOWLEDGE
Seal v. Morgan, citation in materials. Expelled student was unaware that a weapon was in his vehicle. HELD: Student cannot be expelled for truly unknowing or unconscious possession of a forbidden object.– Followed by : Seal v Knox County Board of
Education – wrongful death..
LEA Policies and Codes of Conduct
LEA Policies must be in writing.
1. To satisfy the requirements of Due Process
2. To satisfy the statutory requirements of Act 26 and the GFSA.
Local Law Enforcement Policies:
Local law enforcement will frequently have their own codes and policies concerning actions to be taken in criminal situations. – Example, the recent public relations disaster of
the cuffing of elementary school students.– LEA’s should be aware of the repercussions of
their actions at the time the initial determination to designate an action worthy of a criminal referral is made.
Bullying
New Jersey recently passes bullying legislation Pennsylvania’s proposed bullying legislation stalled
in the House Student on student harassment is a reportable
offense under the DOE’s Acts of Violence and Weapons Possession Reporting system
Possible 1983 actions.
Responsibilities to Student Safety
The imposition of punishment under zero tolerance policies does not relieve school officials of their duty of care and supervision toward students.
Accordingly, punishment, even consistent with the policy must be imposed reasonably and in a safe manner.
– Query as to the known psychological effects of harsh punishment on an emotionally disabled student. Consider Seal v Morgan, included in the attached materials.
Transferring School Discipline:
Section 1317.2(e.1) of the Public School Code provides for alternative assignment by receiving school during continuing period of expulsion from sending school;
But see Hoke v Elizabethtown, in materials. Agreements for Withdrawal in Lieu of
Expulsion
Claims and remedies
42 Pa.CSA §§933 Appeal from Decision of Administrative Agency (State Court)
IDEA claims: Failure to implement behavioral plan, compensatory education etc.
Wrongful death: Suicide as a result of wrongful expulsion & referral to criminal justice system.
Constitutional claims
Constitutional Claims – Equal Protection: rational basis– Due process _ student has a “legitimate
entitlement to a public education as a property interest which is protected by the Due Process Clause”
PA Constitution: Specific right to “reputation” Right to bodily integrity
– First Amendment – Freedom of Speech Privacy – right to raise children as parents see fit
S.G. and Latour
S.G. – 3rd circuit, Judge Sloviter. Kindergartener playing cops and robbers says, “I’m going to shoot you.” Held: Suspension upheld against due process, first amendment, and equal protection challenges.
S.G. v Sayreville Board of Ed., 333 F.3d 417, 422 (3rd Cir. 2003)
Latour – High school rapper had violent threatening language in rap. ACLU case just filed in response to z.t. expulsion.