Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

20
Spacetime Structure of Black Hole Evaporation Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

description

≴ ≲ ≲ ≳ ∨ ≴ ∩ ≲ ≨ ∽∲ ≍ Flat space Schwarzschild We consider a shock wave (shell) of collapsing matters The locus can be approximated by null geodesic Flat space and Schwarzschild are connected at the locus Shock wave approaches to the horizon The horizon of this geometry differs from Schwarzshild

Transcript of Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Page 1: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Spacetime Structure of

Black Hole EvaporationYoshinori Matsuo (KEK)

in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Page 2: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

IntroductionBlack hole evaporation and information loss

String theory implies information never be lost

We construct a model for this processA solution including a backreaction from Hawking radiation ≇⊹⊺∽⊷∲≨≔⊹⊺≩

How about ordinary BH (i.e. Schwarzschild)?Basic idea BH evaporates in finite time Infinite time to get inside BH}Matter never get

Inside the BH

No information lost

(For observer staying outside the BH)

Page 3: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

BH formation with shock wave of matter

≲≲≳∨≴∩

≲≨∽∲≍Flat space

Schwarzschild

We consider a shock wave (shell) of collapsing matters

The locus can be approximated by null geodesic Flat space and Schwarzschild are connected at the

locus Shock wave approaches to the horizon The horizon of this geometry differs from Schwarzshild

Page 4: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Vaidya metricCorrection from Hawking radiation Schwarzschild is modified

≤≳∲∽⊡⊵∱⊡≡∨≵∩≲⊶≤≵∲⊡∲≤≵≤≲∫≲∲≤⊭∲

Vaidya metric

•One-way (incoming or outgoing)•massless and conformal•No angular momentum

satisfies the following Einstein eq.

≇⊹⊺∽∸⊼≔⊹⊺ with

Matters (Hawking rad.) are the following:

a(u) : decreasingOther : 0≔≵≵∽⊡≟≡∨≵∩∸⊼≲∲

Page 5: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Matter fields near the horizonHere we consider the scalar field for example.Evaporation is

slowWe consider Schwarzschild

∱≲∲≀≲≲∨≲⊡≲≈∩≀≲⋁∨≲∩∫≲∡∲≲⊡≲≈⋁∨≲∩⊡≌∲

≲∲⋁∨≲∩⊡≭∲⋁∨≲∩∽∰

⋁∨≲∩⊻∨≲⊡≲≈∩⊧≩∡Near the horizon, the field behaves as

Angular momentum and mass have no contribution. Near the horizon, angular momentum

and mass are effectively zero.

We assume L2 is not very large in NH: ≌∲⊿≲⊡≲≈≲≈

Page 6: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Weyl anomalyWeyl anomaly breaks conformal symmetryIncompatible to the Vaidya metric

Anomaly for the conformal mode of the metric cancels that for the matter fields. We consider the following action:

Schwinger-Dyson eq.

≨≇⊹⊺≩⊡⊷∲≨≔⊹⊺≩∽∰≓≛≧⊹⊺∻≘≝∽∱∲⊷∲

≚≤∴≸≰⊡≧≒∫≓≭≡≴≴≥≲≛≧⊹⊺∻≘≝

does not have anomaly.

Page 7: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Treating fluctuations as mattersWe separate the metric to background and fluctuation. ≧⊹⊺∽≞≧⊹⊺∫⊷≨⊹⊺

≢≇⊹⊺⊡⊷∲≨≔≴≯≴≡≬⊹⊺≩⋃∽∰

Einstein-Hilbert action of background

Matter action which contains the fluctuation.

≓≛≞≧⊹⊺∻≨⊹⊺∻⋁≝∽∱∲⊷∲≚≤∴≸≰⊡≞≧≢≒∫≓≴≯≴≡≬≭≡≴≴≥≲≛≞≧⊹⊺∻≨⊹⊺∻⋁≝

and treat the fluctuation as matter fields.

≞≧⊹⊺∡≞≧⊹⊺∫⊱≞≧⊹⊺ ≨⊹⊺∡≨⊹⊺⊡∱⊷⊱≞≧⊹⊺We consider the following variation

Then, the partition function is invariant:

∰∽⊱≚⋃≄≨⊹⊺≄⋁≥⊡≓≛≞≧∻≨∻⋁≝

Page 8: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Weyl anomaly cancelation

EM tensor depends on the state

≞≧⊹⊺≨≔≴≯≴≡≬⊹⊺≩∽≣∱≒∲∫≣∲≒⊹⊺≒⊹⊺∫≣∳≒⊹⊺⊽⊾≒⊹⊺⊽⊾

However, the trace part comes only from the anomaly. can be balanced with b.g.

and cannot be canceled with the background

Weyl anomaly must be canceled

We take the trace of the Einstein equation:

∰∽⊡∱⊷∲≢≒⊡≞≧⊹⊺⊭≔≴≯≴≡≬⊹⊺⊮⋃

≞≧⊹⊺∽≨≧⊹⊺≩⋃

Here we take the background as

does not depend on the state. No κ-dependence

Page 9: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

A model for black hole evaporation

≲≲≳∨≵∩

≲≨∨≵∩≡∨≵∩

Vaidya metric and flat space are connected.

Time(null) in flat space Time(null) in Vaidya⊡∲≤≲∽≤≾≵∽⊵∱⊡≡∨≵∩≲∨≵∩

⊶≤≵

Inside of the shock wave is replaced by the flat space. Then, the singularity and horizon no longer exist.

Junction condition Shock wave is null in both side.

Page 10: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Hawking radiationHawking radiation occurs even without the horizon. Method of Eikonal approximation

Change of the wave profile is calculated by

In the flat space side, , which is connected to Vaidya metric at the locus of the shock wave. So, we need to calculate relation r and u in Vaidya.

≾≵∽⊡∲≲In the Vaidya side, locus is given by

≲≳∨≵∩∽≲≨∨≵∩∫≃≥≸≰⊷⊡≚≵≡∨≵∰∩≲∲≨∨≵∰∩≤≵∰⊸

expで“ past horizon”に近づく Hawking radiation

≁∡∻∡∰∽≚≤≵≥⊡≩∡∰≵≥≩∡≾≵∨≵∩

Page 11: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Hawking radiation (2)

Hawking temperature is ≔∽ ∱∴⊼≡∨≵∩

Mass of BH changes very slowly. ≟≡∨≵∩⊢≵⊿≡∨≵∩

u dependence can be neglected: ≲≳∨≵∩∽≡∫≃≥⊡≵∲≡ same to ordinary BH

Energy of Hawking radiation ⊻≡∲≔∴⊻∱≡∲

u dependence can be neglected up to . ⊢≵⊻≡∳

Next order correction is ∯≟≡∨≵∩ converges.

≡∨≵∩⊻≡

≲∨∱∩≳∨≵∩∽≚≵≤≵∰≟≡∨≵∰∩≲∨∰∩≳∨≵∰∩⊣≡∨≵∰∩⊡⊡≲∨∰∩≳∨≵∰∩⊡≡∨≵∰∩⊢≬≯≧⊡≲∨∰∩≳∨≵∰∩⊡≡∨≵∰∩⊢⊤≥⊡≒≵≵∰≤≵∰∰ ≡∨≵∰∰∩

∲∨≲∨∰∩≳∨≵∰∰∩∩∲

Page 12: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Reflection by gravitational potential

≲≲≳∨≵∩≡∨≵∩

}Scattered ingoing radiation

Flat space

Potential barrier

We have assumed that there are only outgoing radiationHowever, Hawking radiation is partially

reflected by the potential barrier

We need to generalize the Vaidya metric.

Page 13: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Introducing the ingoing energy flowWe consider geometry with matters which obey ≴≲≔⊹⊺∽∰

≔⊵⊵∽≔∧∧∽∰conformalAngular momentum and mass can be neglected

Most general spherically symmetric geometry is

≤≳∲∽⊡≨∨≵∻≲∩⊡≦∨≵∻≲∩≤≵∲∫∲≤≵≤≲⊢∫≲∲≤⊭∲

∲≇≵≲⊡≦∨≵∻≲∩≇≲≲∽∰From the traceless condition for u-r surface,

≨∨≵∻≲∩∽≀≲∨≲≦∨≵∻≲∩∩

≤≳∲∽⊡≀≲≰∨≵∻≲∩⊷≰∨≵∻≲∩≲≤≵∲∫∲≤≵≤≲⊸∫≲∲≤⊭∲

Then, the metric becomes ( p(u,r) = r f (u,r) )

Page 14: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Generalized Vaidya metric

≤≳∲∽⊡≀≲≰∨≵∻≲∩⊷≰∨≵∻≲∩≲≤≵∲∫∲≤≵≤≲⊸∫≲∲≤⊭∲

p(u,r) satisfies the following EOM:

∲≲≀≵⊵≀∲≲≰∨≵∻≲∩≲≀≲≰∨≵∻≲∩⊶⊡ ∱≰∨≵∻≲∩≀≲

⊵≰∲∨≵∻≲∩≀∲≲≰∨≵∻≲∩≲≀≲≰∨≵∻≲∩⊶∽∰

The Vaidya metric is a special case of ≰∨≵∻≲∩∽≲⊡≡∨≵∩≰∨≵∻≲∩∡≦∨≵∩≰∨≵∻≲∩ ≤≵∰∽≦∨≵∩≤≵is absorbed by

The ingoing energy flow can be expressed as

≓∨≵∻≲∩∽≰∲∨≵∻≲∩≔≲≲∨≵∻≲∩∽≰∲∨≵∻≲∩≀∲≲≰∨≵∻≲∩≲≀≲≰∨≵∻≲∩

The other condition determimes p(u,r).

Page 15: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Conservation law for ingoing energy

The second equation is equivalent to EOM for p(u,r).∰∽≀≵≓∨≵∻≲∩⊡≰∨≵∻≲∩∲≲≀≲≓∨≵∻≲∩⊡∲≀≵≰∨≵∻≲∩≰∨≵∻≲∩≓∨≵∻≲∩Evaporation is very slow We neglect u

dependence.≰∲∨≵∻≲∩≀∲≲≰∨≵∻≲∩≲≀≲≰∨≵∻≲∩ ∽≃∨≵∩Where C can be estimated as

≔≲≲⊻≲∲≰∲≔≵≵ ≃∽≓∽≰∲≔≲≲⊻≟≡⊻⊵≬≰≡

⊶∲

Conservation law is given by

∰∽≀≲≔≵≵∨≵∻≲∩∫∲≲≔≵≵∨≵∻≲∩⊡ ∱≲≰∨≵∻≲∩⊵⊡≀≵≰∨≵∻≲∩≰∨≵∻≲∩≓∨≵∻≲∩∫≀≵≓∨≵∻≲∩⊶

Page 16: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Approximated solutionThe solution can be approximated as

≰∫≡≃≬≯≧⊵≰⊡≡≃≡⊶∽≲⊡≡≥⊮

Numerical solution is plotted asFor

≰⊻≲⊡≡≥⊮≲∾≡

For ≲∼≡≰⊻≃≡∽≣≯≮≳≴∮

This implies that shock wave is smeared around . ≲⊻≡

Outside is approximated by Vaidya.

Page 17: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Static GeometryWe put BH in a heat bath.

In and Out of rad. are balancedfinally goes some stationary state.

≤≳∲∽≰∰∨≲∩⊵⊡≰∨≲∩≲≤≴∲∫≲≰∨≲∩≤≲∲⊶∫≲∲≤⊭∲Stationary geometry with≇⊹⊺≧⊹⊺∽∰and≇⊵⊵∽≇∧∧∽∰

S(r) = C becomes exact.We assume that this metric can be used for r < a. ≰∨≲∩∧≃≡This geometry cannot be used around r = 0, since

≔⊵⊵⊻∱≲∲

Page 18: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Matters inside BH

⊽∽⊡≔≴≴∽∱∸⊼ ≃≲≰∨≲∩≰∰∨≲∩

∸⊼≔≴≴∽≇≴≴∽≰∲∨≲∩≰∰∰∨≲∩≲∳≰∰∨≲∩∽≃≲∲

Energy-momentum tensor inside the BH is

Then, the energy density of matter is given by

Local temperature inside the BH is

≔∽≔≈≰⊡≧≴≴∽≔≈≲ ≲≰∨≲∩≰∰∨≲∩where TH is the Hawking temperature⊻ ∱∴⊼≡

Page 19: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

Entropy

Pressure is not isotropicWe assume the following thermodynamic relation

⊽∽≔≳

Mass is reproduced by integrating the energy density ≍∽∲≚⊧

⊵≔⊹⊺⊡∱∲≔≧⊹⊺⊶≮⊹⊻⊺≰≧⊧≤∳≸∽∲≚⊧⊽≰⊡≧≤∳≸∽≡∲

Then, the total entropy inside the BH is

≓∽≚⊧≤∳≸≰≧⊧≳∽≚≡∰≤≲∲⊼≡≃≲≰∨≲∩∽⊼≡∲

which reproduces the area law:≓∽∱∴≁

Page 20: Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)

We have constructed a model of BH evaporation. Collapsing matters are described by shock wave. Geometry is obtained by connecting flat space and

Vaidya. This geometry has neither singularity nor horizon Hawking radiation occurs without horizon. No information is lost. BH is ordinary thermodynamic object. BH Entropy is reproduced from that of matters inside.

Conclusion