www.smcoe.org

LCAP and Accountability Meeting

January 23, 2015

J Jesus ContrerasAccountability and Compliance Coordinator

Accountability – Innovation - Results

www.smcoe.org

AGENDA

1. LCAP:

> Annual Update

> Goals; Expenditures; CORE Program

2. Accountability:

> LCAP; LEAP; SPSA Alignment and Other Plans Alignment

> Goals; Expenditures; CORE Program and Federal Revenue (T1)

> State and Federal Accountability

3. Calendar Updates:

> LCAP Timeline

www.smcoe.org

Resources:

Episode 9 and 10 – SBE NEW Template

http://lcff.wested.org/lcff-channel/lcff-implementation-videos/

California Department of Education (CDE) LCFF web page at: http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/

www.smcoe.org

Resources:

Please note that the date for LCAP Webinar Part 3 has recently changed. The most up-to-date information is below.

The LCAP Webinar Part 3 – Making Data Meaningful in the LCAP will be presented from 3:30-4:30 p.m. on Monday, February 2, 2015.

You may view the latest post at

http://lcff.wested.org/registration-for-lcap-webinar-series-part-3/

www.smcoe.org

2014-15 LCFF-LCAP - Mindset

The 2014-15 revision/update of the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) will continue to be rooted in the principles for EQUITY established in the Local Control funding Formula (LCFF) statute:

Improved student outcomes & elimination of subgroup gaps

Subsidiarity – LCAP Goals, Actions and Services Results

Transparency

Stakeholder Engagement

www.smcoe.org

LCFF/LCAP State Priorities

8 State Priorities and Related Data ElementsNeeds Assessment Goals Resource Alignment Services Outcomes

Student Achievement Performance on

assessments Academic Performance

Index College and Career

Readiness English learners becoming

reclassified and proficient Advanced Placement

Exams passage Prepared through Early

Assessment Program Basic Services Rate of teacher mis-

assignments Student Access to

standards-aligned instructional resources and materials

Facilities

Course Access Student access and

enrollment in courses of study

Student Engagement School attendance rates Chronic absenteeism rates Middle School dropout

rates High School dropout rates High School graduation

rates

School Climate Student

suspension rates

Student expulsion rates

Other local measures

Implementation of CCSS CCSS implementation

results for all students, including English learners

Parental Involvement Efforts to

seek parent input

Promotion of parental participation and leadership

Other Student Outcomes Other indicators of student

performance in courses of study. May include performance and other exams.

7

2015-16 Revised LCAP

SECTION 2: GOALS, ACTIONS, EXPENDITURES, AND PROGRESS INDICATORS

SECTION 1: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

SECTION 3: USE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AND CONCENTRATION GRANT FUNDS AND PROPORTIONALITY

ANNUAL UPDATE

“New” LCAP Section 2 (2015-16)

GOAL:  

Related State and/or Local Priorities:1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__ 6__ 7__ 8__

COE only: 9__ 10__Local : Specify _____________________

Identified Need :  

Goal Applies to:

Schools:

 

Applicable Pupil Subgroups:

 

LCAP Year 1: xxxx-xxExpected Annual

Measurable Outcomes: 

Actions/ServicesScope of Service

Pupils to be served within identified scope of service BudgetedExpenditures

__ALL

OR:__Low Income pupils __English Learners__Foster Youth __Redesignated fluent English proficient __Other Subgroups:(Specify)________________________ 

Revised LCAP

SECTION 2: GOALS, ACTIONS, EXPENDITURES, AND PROGRESS INDICATORS

SECTION 1: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

SECTION 3: USE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AND CONCENTRATION GRANT FUNDS AND PROPORTIONALITY

ANNUAL UPDATE

Annual UpdateAnnual Update Instructions: For each goal in the prior LCAP year, review the progress toward the expected annual outcome(s) based on, at a minimum, the required metrics pursuant to Education Code sections 52060 and 52066. The review must include an assessment of the effectiveness of the specific actions. Describe any changes to the actions or goals the LEA will take as a result of the review and assessment. In addition, review the applicability of each goal in the LCAP.

www.smcoe.org

Annual Update-Guiding Questions

•How do we need to report to ALL stakeholders about the Goals,

Actions and Services included in the 2014-15 LCAP?

•Provide evidence to stakeholders

Complete a copy of this table for each of the LEA’s goals in the prior year LCAP. Duplicate and expand the fields as necessary.

Annual Update

Annual Update

Complete a copy of this table for each of the LEA’s goals in the prior year LCAP. Duplicate and expand the fields as necessary.

Annual Update

Important for business and program staff to work together for Estimated Actual Annual Expenditure column.

Annual Update Considerations

Update is completed in conjunction with the next year’s LCAP

Gather data on actions and services that are being provided to share with stakeholders

Review data as measured by required and locally determined by required and locally determined metrics

Be ready to communicate which quantitative and qualitative data/metrics were examined to review progress on LCAP goals

What goals, actions/services need to be calibrated?

Annual Update Considerations

Create opportunities for stakeholders to gain capacity in understanding data/metrics

Make sure to provide clear information on:

- Services and actions that have been provided

- Services and actions that are yet to be provided

- Estimated Actual Annual Expenditures

- Availability and Use of Metrics

> Use the LCAP Annual Update Appendices to communicate

Base-Program and MPP

•What Constitutes the District’s Base-Program?

•Supplement v. Supplant in the era of LCAP

•State v. Federal Resources

Minimum Proportionality Percentage

MPP is the lowest level of increased or improved services forunduplicated students A minimum, not a maximum Services funded with LCFF

Not federal or other restricted

Services are above those provided for all students (base program) Not above services in prior year Not a maintenance of effort calculation

In the LCAP year Not the current year Can calculate additional years for transition planning

Minimum Proportionality Percentage

At full LCFF implementationThe MPP calculation is:

*Less TIIG and Transportation (add-ons)

Supplemental&

Concentration

Grants

All

Othe

r

LCFFFunding*

%

MPP

LCAP 3A-Describe ExpendituresKey Changes – 5 CCR 15496 Funded – Added to 15496 the requirement to identify

those services that are being funded in addition to identifying services being provided on a districtwide and schoolwide basis

Principally – Added to section 15496 related to describing how districtwide and schoolwide services are principally directed towards meeting the district’s goals for its unduplicated pupils

And are effective in – Added to 15496 related to describing how districtwide and schoolwide services are effective in meeting the district’s goals for its unduplicated pupils

Provide basis for this determination – Added to 15496 the requirement that the description provided for districtwide and schoolwide services provide the basis for this determination, including, but not limited to, any alternatives considered and any supporting research, experience, or educational theory

LCAP 3A – Describe Expenditures

Describe how LEA is expending S&C funds in the LCAP Year

•LOW-INCOME PUPILS

• ENGLISH LEARNERS

• FOSTER YOUTH

If DISTRICTWIDE,

SCHOOLWIDE,

COUNTYWIDE, or

CHARTERWIDE

• REDESIGNATED FLUENT ENGLISH PROFICIENT•OTHER SUBGROUPS

• FOSTER YOUTH

LCAP 3A – Describe Expenditures Clearly defining base to determine services

above and beyond what is provided to all students What an LEA would provide to all students if no

S&C funds received Starting point for determining services

above and beyond what is provided to all students

Will look different for most districts

55% + Unduplicated Students*• Identify services funded and

provided• Describe how services are:

– Principally directed toward(local discretion)

– Effective in meeting goals forunduplicated students

•Less than 55%**• Identify services funded and• provided• Describe how services are:

– Principally directed toward• (local discretion)

– Effective in meeting goals for• unduplicated students

• Describe how services are most effective:– Include basis for determination– Any alternatives considered– Supporting research,

experience,• or educational theory

District-wide Use of Funds

*Note: Current or prior year **Note: Current year only

40% + Unduplicated Students*• Identify services funded and

provided• Describe how services are:

– Principally directed toward(local discretion)

– Effective in meeting goals forunduplicated students

•Less than 40%**• Identify services funded and• provided• Describe how services are:

– Principally directed toward• (local discretion)

– Effective in meeting goals for• unduplicated students

• Describe how services are most effective:– Include basis for determination– Any alternatives considered– Supporting research,

experience,• or educational theory

School-wide Use of Funds

**Note: Current year enrollment only*Note: Enrollment in current or prior year

What about Federal Revenue?

•Requires Clear Definition of the District’s Base-Program?

•Supplement v. Supplant

•FPM and Federal Resources Accountability – 2015-16 On-Site Reviews

LCAP; SPSA; and LEA Plans Relationship and Timeline

SSC Responsibilities

•Develop SPSA, monitor SPSA, and evaluate the activities and expenditures for Con App programs operated at the school to improve student achievement, and•Added legal responsibilities by state and federal legislatures.

(Education Code Section 64001)

29

Suggested Timeline for 2014-15July – December 2014

Identify and consult stakeholdersReview LCAP goals, actions and services for needed adjustmentsUpdate progressReview available data for Annual ReportDevelop timeline for data collection and reportingReport demographic information via CALPADSReview alignment of district & site plans with LCAP

January - March 2015

Consult stakeholders

Continue modification of LCAP and updating progress on Annual Report

Review proposed state budget (2015-16) and local implications

Submit 2nd Interim Budget report

April - June 2015Consult stakeholdersReview May revision of proposed State budget (2015-16) and local implications

Invite public comment on draft LCAP

Present draft LCAP to PACsRespond to comments in writingFinalize Annual ReportHold LCAP and budget public hearingReceive local board approvalSubmit to SMCOEReceive LCAPs from charter schools

Suggested Local Accountability Calendar - 1

• Goals/Metrics Refinement

• District Plan(s) Alignment• SMCOE Feedback

Integration

LCAP Refinement Nov./Dec. 2014

• Site plan-LCAP alignment• Document/report on

federal funds• Identify LCAP implications

SPSA Alignment and Revision

Dec. 2014-Feb. 2015 • LCAP refinement based on Site Plan input

• LCAP/2nd Interim submitted to local board for approval

LCAP & 2nd Interim Budget Reporting

March15, 2014

Suggested Local Accountability Calendar - 2

• SPSA data update to stakeholders @ sites

• Site-based LCAP input/feedback garnered

SPSA Monitoring & Reporting

March/April 2015

• Aggregated data report• Site input/feedback

integration• LCAP refinment (as needed) &

District-wide committee engagements

LCAP Refinment April./May 2015

• LCAP/Final Budget submitted to board for approval

LCAP/Final BudgetJune 30, 2015

33

Resources for Stakeholder Engagement

http://www.cde.ca.gov/qs/

Questions?

34