Www.cengage.com/cj/siegel Larry J. Siegel Joe Morris Northwestern State University Cherly Gary North...
-
Upload
alex-barefield -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
2
Transcript of Www.cengage.com/cj/siegel Larry J. Siegel Joe Morris Northwestern State University Cherly Gary North...
www.cengage.com/cj/siegel
Larry J. Siegel
Joe Morris • Northwestern State UniversityCherly Gary • North Central Texas College
Lisa Ann Zilney • Montclair State
Chapter 11
Corrections: History, Institutions, and Populations
Learning Objectives
• Identify the components of the correctional institution system.• Discuss some of the most significant problems facing the
correctional system.• Articulate how the first penal institutions developed in Europe.• Explain how William Penn revolutionized corrections.• Compare the New York and Pennsylvania prison models.• Chart the development of penal reform.• List the purpose of jails and know about jail populations.• Be familiar with the term “new generation jail”• Classify the different types of federal and state penal
institutions.• Discuss prison population trends.
History of Correctional Institutions
• 1557 Bridewell workhouse built to hold those convicted of relatively minor offenses
• Incarceration did not become the norm until 19th century
• 10th century England prisons used to detain debtors, unemployed, or those awaiting trial
• First penal institutions were devoid of proper care, food, or medical treatment
The Origin of Corrections in the United States• Modern American correctional system had its origin
in Pennsylvania under leadership of William Penn• Quaker influence
The Auburn System
• Tier system• Congregate system• Three classes of prisoners were created:• Those in solitary• Those allowed labor as a form of recreation• Those who worked and ate together during the
day and separated at night
The Pennsylvania System
• Each inmate in a single cell• Classifications were abolished because isolation
would prevent inmates from contaminating each other
• Built in a circle with cells placed along its circumference
• Penance
Prison Structure Living Activity Discipline
AuburnSystem
Tiered Cells Congregate Group Work
Silence, Harsh punishment
Pennsylvania System
Single cells set in semicircle
Isolated In-cell work,Bible Study
Silence, Harsh Punishment
Auburn vs. Pennsylvania System
Corrections in the 19th Century
• Similar to today• Development of prison industry:• Contract system• Convict-lease system• Prison farms
Development of Parole
• Transportation common sentence for theft offenders• Service abandoned after revolution• Ticket of leave• Zebulon Brockway
Prisons in the 20th Century
• Time of contrast in the U.S. prison system• Advocate of reform, rehabilitation, education, religion• Development of specialized prisons• Industrial prisons for hard-core inmates• Agricultural prisons for non dangerous offenders• Institutions for criminally insane
• Opposition by organized labor restricts the use of prison labor and sale of prison made goods
Contemporary Correctional Institutions
• Prisoners’ rights movement• Violence within the corrections system a national
concern• Traditional correctional rehabilitation efforts viewed
as having failed prompted reconsideration of incapacitating criminals
Jails
• Detain accused offenders who cannot make bail• Hold convicted offenders awaiting sentence• Confinement for those convicted of misdemeanors• Hold probationers and parolees arrested for
violations and waiting for a hearing• House felons when state prisons are overcrowded
Black
Hispanic
White
Jail Populations by Race and Ethnicity, 1990-2008
1990 1994 1998 2002 20060
Year
1,000
750
500
250
Nu
mb
er o
f ja
il i
nm
ates
p
er 1
00,0
00 U
.S.
resi
den
ts
Adult males
Adult females
Juveniles
Jail Population by Gender, 1990-2008
1990 1994 1998 2002 20060
Year
600,000
400,000
200,000
Nu
mb
er o
f ja
il i
nm
ates
(o
ne-
day
co
un
t)
Jail Conditions
• Services not sufficiently regulated• No unified national policy on what constitutes
adequate conditions• Among the most dilapidated and under funded
confinement facilities in the U.S.
New Generation Jails
• Use of pods or living areas rather than linear/intermittent surveillance model
• Allows for continuous observation• Safer environment
Types of Prison
Alternative Correctional Institutions
• Prison farms and camps• Shock incarceration in boot camps• Community correctional facilities• Private prisons
Prison Farms and Camps
• Primarily in the South and the West• Some famous for abuse and mistreatment of
prisoners
Shock Incarceration in Boot Camps
• For youthful, first-time offenders• Military discipline and physical training• Scared straight• Some have educational and training elements• Cost is no lower than traditional incarceration• High failure rates• Reduce prison overcrowding
Community Correctional Facilities
• Bridge gap between institutional living and community
• Offer specialized treatment• Used as intermediate sanction
Private Prisons
• Operated by private firms as business enterprises for profit
• Expectations specified in contract with government• Some research shows recidivism rates lower• Tend to take the best prisoners• Private and public prisons cost about the same to
operate, but privates are cheaper to build• Unresolved legal issues: mistreatment of
prisoners, use of deadly force, immunity from lawsuits
• Effects on inmates: sent far from home, isolation, difficulty of reintegration
Inmate Populations
• Reflects common traits of arrestees held in local jails• Young, single, poorly educated, male, and minority
group members.• Number of women incarcerated is increasing at a
faster rate than males• Many inmates suffer from multiple social,
psychological, emotional, and health problems• Prison populations continue to increase despite a
decade long drop in the crime rate
Growth Trends
• New admissions for drug offenses• Mandatory sentences• Truth in sentencing laws• Policy decisions driven by political concerns
Incarceration Rates
1980 1989 1998 20070
Year
600
500
300
100
Nu
mb
er o
f o
ffen
der
sp
er 1
00,0
00 p
op
ula
tio
n
400
200
Future Trends
• Population may be maxing out• Budget cutbacks may halt expansion• Public may question strict incarceration