WWF - Measuring and communicating high level results © PJ Stephenson.
-
Upload
cooper-laxton -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of WWF - Measuring and communicating high level results © PJ Stephenson.
Click icon to add picture
WWF - Measuring and communicating high level results
© PJ Stephenson
© PJ Stephenson
Challenges - Diverse programme portfolio
© PJ Stephenson
© PJ Stephenson
Namibian National CBNRM Programme 2002 - Benefits
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Conservancy Non-Financial Benefits
NR-based Household/Wage Income
Conservancy / Enterprise Committee Income
© Martin Harvey/WWF-Canon
© WWF-Canon/Folke WULF
Few examples of programmes monitoring impact
LIFE Project, Namibia
INSIGHT
Key elements of the improved GPF monitoring & reporting system
The system is based on whatis already good practice:• Strategic plans• Indicators for goals and objectives• Data collection and analysis• Reporting (using data)• Peer review and evaluations
© PJ Stephenson
· Initial team· Scope & vision· Targets & threats· Context & stakeholders
1. Define
· Goals & objectives· Strategic activities· Monitoring plan· Operational plan
2. Design
· Workplans & budgets· Fund raising· Capacity building· Partnerships
3. Implement
· Incoming data· Results & assumptions· Operational functions· Plans & budgets
4. Analyze/Adapt
· Lessons· Products· Feedback & evaluation· Learning culture
5. Share
WWF’s Conservation
Project/Programme Cycle
Indicator StatusS1. Habitat cover In use - data availableS2. Habitat fragmentation In use - data availableS3. Flagship species populations In use – data availableS4. Environmental flows Under development – freshwater
prog.S5. State of the ocean (to be determined) Under development – marine
prog.S6. Species diversity index To be developedP1. Habitat loss and degradation In use - data availableP2. Offtake of flagship species Under development – TRAFFICP3. Over-exploitation of footprint species Under development – TRAFFICP4. River fragmentation FINALIZEDP5. CO2 gas emissions In use - data availableP6. Energy consumption In use - data availableR1. Size of protected areas In use - data availableR2. Protected area management effectiveness
In use - data available
R3. Wildlife trade Under development – TRAFFICR4a. Sustainable production of commodities In use - data available
R4b. Sustainable production of commodities In use - data available
R5. Sustainable production of energy In use - data available
R6. Sustainable production of water To be confirmed by footprint progs.
B1. Number of beneficiaries Under development – SD4C
I1. Partnerships Under development - CSPU
WWF common programme indicators
Considerations for selecting marine indicators
Complement what we have alreadyUse what existing programmes need :- Global priority places with marine ecoregions (Arctic,
Coastal East Africa , Coral Triangle, Galapagos, Madagascar, Mediterranean , Southern Chile, Southern Ocean , Southwest Pacific, West Africa Marine
- Smart fishing- Market transformation- Global Marine ProgrammeOverarching principles for common indicators: - keep them based on what teams need anyway- keep number low- make them feasible and cost effective
© PJ Stephenson © PJ Stephenson
© PJ Stephenson © PJ Stephenson/WWF-Canon
Place-based Programme Dashboard
Species dashboard
Climate and energy programme
Global 2020 Places Goal:Are WWF priority places protected and well managed?
Share, learn, improve
Creating partnerships and policies to collect, analyze and share data
Harmonizing indicators and monitoring systems
Renewing efforts to fill data gaps
Using data to inform decision-making, policy development and adaptive
management
Developing new indicators with a bottom up
approach so data are also relevant to national
or local project monitoring
© PJ Stephenson