Writing concrete in abstract
-
Upload
saldy-yusuf -
Category
Education
-
view
717 -
download
2
Transcript of Writing concrete in abstract
WRITING CONCRETE IN ABSTRACT
Saldy Yusuf, MHS.,ETN
Editor Jurnal Luka IndonesiaAdvanced Wound Care Department, ETN Centre Indonesia
Griya Afiat Wound Care-home Care Clinic, Makassar-Indonesia
2ND WOC-SM SCIENTIFIC MEETING, GRAND CLARION HOTEL MAKASSAR, 27-28 NOVEMBER 2015
2ND WOC SM 2015 SCIENTIFIC WRITING
Menulis konkrit dalam abstrak
Status Quo publikasi Indonesia
http://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php?area=0&category=0®ion=all&year=all&order=it&min=0&min_type=it
Diakses tanggal: 17 November 2015
Where is Indonesia?
ABSTRACT, WHAT IS?
‘forming a general concept from consideration of particular instances’ and ‘theoretical summary’
the Oxford English Dictionary (2004)
“…overview of the paper…” Sheldon and Jackson (1999)
Coad, J., & Devitt, P. (2006). Research dissemination: The art of writing an abstract for conferences. Nurse Education in Practice, 6(2), 112–6. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2005.08.003
An abstract is miniature of a paper
TYPE OF ABSTRACT: NON STRUCTURALTITTLE
AUTHORS
AFFILIATIONS
CITING
ABSTRAK
Yusuf, S., Okuwa, M., Shigeta, Y., Dai, M., Iuchi, T., Sulaiman, R., … Sanada, H. (2013). Microclimate and development of pressure ulcers and superficial skin changes. International Wound Journal.
Shigeta, Y. I., Sanada, H., Konya, C., Yusuf, S., Supriadi, & Sugama, J. (2014). Risk assessment tool for incontinence-associated dermatitis in elderly patients combining tissue tolerance and perineal environment predictors : a prospective clinical study. Chronic Wound Care Management and Research, 1, 41–47.
BACKGROUNDOBJECTIVE
METHODS
RESULTS
CONCLUSIONSKEYWORDS
TYPE OF ABSTRACT: STRUCTURAL
1. BACKGROUNDAt least provide 3 sentences
1. What is already known.2. What is unknown.3. Indicate an issue/problems.
Indonesia is one of the biggest archipelago country. The population of diabetes mellitus (DM) reported increase year by year, including high prevalence of diabetic foot ulcer. One of complications DM is development of diabetic foot ulcers. Even tough diabetic foot assessment essential to prevent development diabetic foot ulcers, the effectiveness of diabetic foot assessment to prevent development diabetic foot ulcers has not been evaluated.
Ineffective background
The prevalence diabetic foot ulcer in Indonesia is high. One of essential preventive strategies is diabetic foot assessment. However, the importance of diabetic foot assessment has not been evaluated.
Make it simple
2. OBJECTIVE/AIMS
Clearly define • Objective of your study.• Not objective of your variables.
• The aim of monofilament test to evaluate presence of neuropathy among diabetic foot.
• The aim of ankle brachial index to evaluate presence peripheral ischemic.
Objective of Study
Misperception on objective
• The objective of this study to evaluate predictors of diabetic foot ulcers
3. METHODS
Explain in detail• Research design (setting, time)• Sample and sampling technique• Tools, scoring, devices, • Statistical analysis.
This was a prospective cohort study, conducted in ETN Centre Indonesia from March to December 2014. Inclusion criteria were DM type II, age > 18 years. Demography data interviewed using minimum data sheet (MDS), neuropathy status evaluated with monofilament test (5.07/10 g SWM). While presence angiopathy evaluated by ankle brachial index (ABI) (8 MHz hand held Doppler (Bidop ES-100V3, Hadeco-Kawasaki, Japan). The main outcome analyzed using binary logistic regression with SPSS 16 (Chicago Inc, USA).
Write method systematicallydesign
sample
Tools and devices
analysis
4. RESULTSanswer of method
• Your finding not your opinion.• Objective not subjective• Systematically.
• In this study we used Barbara Bates Jensen (BBJ) score to evaluate healing progress this is method.
• Increase quality of life tool not described in method.• This technique is safety how do you evaluate?• Patient feel comfortable percentage?
Some mistaken sentences
4. RESULTS
EfficientThere were 145 participants in analysis. Female (95, 65.5%), neuropathy (74, 51.0%) and angiopathy (30, 20.6%). Based on logistic regression, predictors for DFU were age (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.005-1.074) and foot inspection (OR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.186-0.703).
This study conducted in ETN Centre Indonesia, a wound care clinic in Makassar eastern Indonesia, 149 participants enrolled in this study remain 145 in analysis (2 of them discontinued the assessment, one participant reject to complete the study). There were 95 female and 50 male. Of them mainly graduated from university with duration DM less than 10 years. Monofilament test confirmed presence neuropathy 74 (51.0%) with OR (95% CI: 53.7-57.0%), p < 0.05 and ankle brachial index test confirmed presence angiopathy 30 (20.6%) with (95% CI: 10.3-13.6%) p< 0.05 significant statistically.
38 words
Inefficient
91 words
CONCLUSION
• Never write opinion.• Write based on evidence.
Answer of objective
• “Health service institution needs to develop this system” this is recommendation.• “Oxygen therapy increase cellular migration” indirect conclusion• “XXX devices promote wound healing”
conclusion without evidence
Some mistaken
KEYWORDS
• A good keywords reflects your abstract.
• Easily to index in portal (PubMED, Scopus, CINAHL, etc)
Reflect your abstract
• Monofilament test, Ipswich test, diabetic foot.• Better to use MESH (Medical Subject Heading)
Keywords, example:
PATHOLOGICAL ABSTRACT
• Title Doesn’t reflect the abstract.• Objective Doesn’t written clearly.• Method Difficult to duplicate.• Results Suddenly.• Conclusion Nbased on data.
www.phdcomics.com
DIAGNOSE YOUR ABSTRACT
Objective
Methods
Title
Conclusion
Results
Keywords
Objective Discussion
TERIMA KASIH
Spesialis Perawatan LukaJl. Syekh Yusuf V/3 Makssar, IndonesiaHp: 0812 418 418 00
GRIYA AFIAT MAKASSAR
www.saldyusuf.blogspot.com
saldy yusuf