Working Paper VIII
-
Upload
biodistrict-new-orleans -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of Working Paper VIII
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 1/21
Working Paper 8
BioDistrict New Orleans
Preferred PlanJune 2011
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 2/21
2 June 2011Working Paper 8 Table of Contents
Acknowledgement
The AECOM team would like to acknowledge
the GNOBEDD Board and staff for their input and
engagement during this Task. This report has also been
developed in coordination with the entire AECOM
team. The team includes: EDAW / AECOM, AECOM
Economics, AECOM Transportation, Bright Moments,Cannon Design, CBRE, Chester Engineers and The
Ehrhardt Group.
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 3/21
3
01 02
Task 8 Overview
07
Overview
Refined Alternative
Plans
11
Summary
12
Preferred Plan
20
Plan Summary
Section:
Table of Contents
04
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 4/21
4 June 2011Working Paper 8 Table of Contents
This page intentionally left blank.
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 5/21
5
Section 01:
Task 8 Overview
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 6/21
6 Working Paper 8 Task 8 Overview June 2011
BioDistrict New Orleans. Bird’s-eye view of a new research and residential area.
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 7/21
7
Task 8 Overview: Preferred PlanThe purpose of Task 8, Preferred Plan, was to use
the stakeholder feedback gathered during the Task 7
alternatives workshops to create a single, refined plan
for the BioDistrict’s. The four alternatives preceding
this final plan, and the public and technical review
comments, are all contained in Working Paper 7. The
final preferred plan is not a modified version of any
single one of the preceding alternatives, but rather an
aggregated concept representing a combination of
elements from all four alternatives, deletion of other
elements based on stakeholder feedback, and newrecommendations formulated to support and enhance
the elements of the final concept.
As could be expected in any post-Katrina planning effort in
New Orleans, there was intense discussion of alternatives.
One neighborhood organization stated a position of no-
support in early April, citing potential loss of housing stock
and fears regarding loss of zoning control. In response to
local concerns, the State Legislature authorized expansion
of the BioDistrict Board to allow two residents of the
District to serve as voting members.
The next step in the strategic planning process will be to
prepare more specific recommendations related to eachof the broad concepts contained in the Preferred Plan,
including modified roadway cross-sections, cost estimates,
development yields and policy and implementation
recommendations.
.
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 8/21
8 June 2011Working Paper 8 Task 8 Overview
This page intentionally left blank.
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 9/21
9
Section 02:
Preferred Plan
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 10/21
10 June 2011Working Paper 8 Preferred Plan
This page intentionally left blank.
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 11/21
11
Preferred PlanSummary
Stakeholder feedback resulted in two significant
directives for the Preferred Plan. First, community
stakeholders felt strongly that large-scale, planned
development should be directed to non-neighborhood
areas of the District and that existing, largely residential
areas be left to redevelop organically. Secondly,
residents indicated that there is no need for or interest
in a large, regional open space or park as represented
in several of the alternatives. Concerns regarding the
lack of maintenance in existing parks, and the proximity
of the LaFitte Greenway as a significant regional
recreational resource were the driving factors behind
this sentiment.
With these two key factors in mind, the Preferred
Plan seeks to strengthen the ‘key development areas’
concept on which previous alternatives were built.
The Plan identifies five key areas largely outside of the
District’s core residential areas in Gert Town, Mid-City
and New City. The plan focuses instead on the following
five areas:
• Xavier / Gert Town
(emphasizing the interface between institution
and community, more than intervention within the
neighborhood)
• Galvez Research Neighborhood
• Tulane / Canal Street
• Allied Health Campus
• Civic Center
Enhanced bicycle facilities, pedestrian malls and public art will define the
BioDistrict as a human-scaled, people-oriented, urban environment in
which to live, study and work.
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 12/21
12 June 2011Working Paper 8 Preferred Plan
Preferred Plan
Preferred Plan: Key Development Areas
Key Elements: carried forward
A number of elements from prior alternatives have been
carried forward into the Preferred Plan. These elements,
along with the alternatives in which they were included,
are listed below:
• City Hall revitalization and associated
redevelopment of Duncan Plaza. (A, B, C, D)
• A new Allied Health Sciences campus around the
former Charity Hospital complex. (A)
• Expansion of Tulane Medical School. (A)
• Reconfiguration of I-10/Claiborne Avenue
interchange. (B, C)
• Claiborne Avenue at grade. (A, B, C, D)
Key Elements: new
Recombination of the plan ‘pieces’ found in the
alternatives highlighted new opportunities and issues to
be addressed in the Preferred Plan. New elements not
shown in prior alternatives are listed below:
• Linear park redevelopment of retired railroad ROW in
Gert Town.
• Internal BioDistrict shuttle loop.
• Bicycle connections on 1/2-mile grid.
• Long-term ‘temporary’ container nurseries to source
BioDistrict street trees and plant materials.
• Close-able, pedestrian-oriented streets.
A
B
C
D E
C a r r o
l l t o n
T u la ne
Earhar t
W a s h i n g t o n
B r o a d
J e f f D a v i s
C l a i b o r n e
G a l v e z
Canal
I-10
Banks
L o y o l a
P o y d r a
s
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 13/21
13
Key Development Area A:
Galvez Research Neighborhood
This development area represents a complete urbanneighborhood--with places to shop, live and work—and
is expected to supply the level of amenities and housing
choice demanded by the ‘Creative Class’ demographic
working in the adjacent VA and UMC complexes, as
well as in the new R&D businesses the District hopes
to attract. Located lakeside of Claiborne Avenue, this
new development node will use Tulane Avenue and
Galvez Street as its primary retail and public/private
biotech research corridor, with an interior core of low-
and medium-density residential development clustered
around a new neighborhood park. Although a smallnumber of parcels will require downzoning from light
industrial to residential, the real challenge for this
development node is anticipated to be parcel assembly
due to the neighborhood’s large number of small, narrow
lots.
Key Development Area A: Galvez Research Neighborhood
Container nursery
G a
l v e z
S t
B r o
a d S t
Perdido St
Poydras St
Gravier St
Tulane Ave
res
res pkg
res res
R&D
RET
R&D
PKG
R&D
R&D
R&D
R&D
R&D
R&D
R&D
R & DPKG
PKG
PKG
RET RES
RES
RES
RES
RES
RES
RES RES
supportive housing
RES RES
RES
RES RES
RES
RES
RES
RES
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 14/21
14 June 2011Working Paper 8 Preferred Plan
Key Development Area B:
Xavier /Gert TownThe southwestern portion of the BioDistrict, occupied
by Xavier University and the historic Gert Town
neighborhood, suffers from a series of physical and
psychological disconnects. This focus area seeks to
promote a mutually beneficial relationship between
the community and the institution, and to mitigate the
isolating effects of the area’s roadway infrastructure.
The Action Plan underlines the need for a constructive
dialogue between the area’s two main interests, in order
to accommodate Xavier’s physical expansion needs
while also working toward revitalization of this historicneighborhood, including rebuilding and reopening the
community pool and elementary school.
In order to reconnect Xavier and Gert Town with the rest
of the District, the Plan recommends the creation of a
linear green space along the alignment of the old Illinois
Central Railroad; this park will serve as both amenity and
non-vehicular connection. For vehicular connection, the
Action Plan recommends both an internal District circulatorand a new streetcar line on Washington Avenue.
Key Development Area B: Xavier/Gert Town
Linear park.
C a r r
o l l t o n A v e
Edinburgh St
PKGacad
ACAD
ACAD ACAD
A CA DA CA D
A CA D
A CA DA CA D
PKG PKG
PKG
NURS
UNIV
A CA D
UNIV
UNIV
UNIVUNIVUNIV
REC
RET
RET
SCH
Ea r ha r t B l v d
W ashington Ave
Ho ward A ve
P i n e S t
INDIND
IND
IND
IND
INDIND
IND
IND
RET
RETRET
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 15/21
15
Key Development Area C:
Tulane/Canal Street
This development area, like the Xavier/Gert TownArea, focuses on accommodating and integrating
academic growth into the existing urban fabric. Key
recommendations in this area include the transformation
of three blocks of Gravier Street into a pedestrian-
oriented spine (but still carrying vehicular traffic) with
adjacent public open space, and the renovation of two
existing buildings into a math and science magnet
school offering intern and enrichment opportunities with
the adjacent university. The Action Plan also strengthens
the area’s retail base and increases local access to
fresh food through the introduction of a City Market in arenovated car dealership building on the corner of Tulane
and Claiborne. This enterprise would offer farmers’
market type kiosks as well as ready-to-eat foodstuffs in
an indoor-outdoor format.
Zoning for the Tulane/Canal Street area is not anticipated
to pose a problem, although the large number of smaller
parcels may pose a complicated or extended landassembly process. Development should be coordinate
with plans for the renovation of the adjacent Iberville
public housing complex.
Key Development Area C: Tulane/Canal Street
T u l a n e A v e
Canal St
C l a i b o r n e A v e
E
l k P l a c e ( L o y o l a A v e )
Cleveland Ave
RES
RET
M.U.
M.U.
MATH/SCI
HS
M.U.
PKG
RES RES
RES
RES
RESRESRES
ACAD
ACAD
RES
A C A D
A C A D
hospital pkg
acad pkg hotel/conf
acad
pkg
historic res
historic ret / res
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 16/21
16 June 2011Working Paper 8 Preferred Plan
Key Development Area D:
Allied Health Campus
The Allied Health Campus will bring together theresources and opportunities of the City’s premier
educational institutions onto a shared, urban campus in
the heart of the BioDistrict. This clustered academic and
training campus is envisioned as an important workface
development resource, and will serve a critical role
in addressing the pressing need for a pool of skilled,
medically-oriented technicians and professionals to
support the BioDistrict’s expanding research and patient
care activities.
The Allied Health Campus will include a pool of shared
student and faculty resources such as dining, library,
meeting and classroom spaces, as well as daycare,recreation and a campus bookstore. The campus can
offer flexible satellite facilities or act as primary campus
expansion, based on the evolving needs of each
institution. The campus will be created through a mix
of new construction and renovation/reuse of existing
structures, most notably the now-vacant Charity Hospital
building.
The Action Plan expects near-term activity in this
development area through the construction of a new
Delgado Community College academic building, withfurther academic and support buildings coming on line
through a masterplanning and institutional-demand
process. The most challenging portion of the Allied Health
Campus is likely to be identifying an appropriate and
economically viable plan to renovate and reuse the Charity
Hospital building.
Key Development Area D: Allied Health Campus
C l a i b
o r n
e A
v e
Perdido St
Gravier St
Charity Hospital
Tulane Ave
Pkg
Pkg
Pkg
acad a c a d
acad
ACAD ACAD
ACAD
LIB / REC
PKG
L a S a l l e
S t
F r e r e t
acad
acad
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 17/21
17
Key Development Area E: Civic Centert
Key Development Area C:
Civic Center This development area focuses on increasing the
capacity and efficiency of the City’s governmental
functions, in tandem with creating a civic ‘front door’
and ‘living room’ for public gatherings. In order to
provide expansion room for itself and for City Hall,
the Civil Courts will move to a new, larger building
immediately adjacent to Duncan Plaza. City Hall will be
expanded in the direction of the plaza, with space for
new cultural or commercial buildings on either side of
it. The public library is also renovated to include a new,
formal entrance facing the plaza. At the heart of thenew civic district, Duncan Plaza is renovated to provide a
more flexible, special-event and public gathering space;
streets on either side of the plaza are also redesigned
to function as overflow space that can be closed to
vehicular traffic during special events.
Old-meets-new City Hall expansion, Denver. i m a g e : w i k i m e d i a . c o m
G r a v
i e r
S t
P e r d
i d o
S t
P o y
d r a
s S t
T u
l a n e
A v e
Loyola Ave
LaSalle St
Pkg
Ofc
acad
acad
CIVIC
ACAD
OFC
PKG
CIVIC CIVIC
OFC
Ofc
Ofc
Ofc
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 18/21
18 June 2011Working Paper 8 Preferred Plan
Roadways & Non-Vehicular Circulation
The Preferred Plan focuses on creating a ‘complete’
circulation network that more equitably balancesthe needs of pedestrians, cyclists, transit riders and
motorists. Roadways receiving the most visible
enhancements are Tulane Avenue, Claiborne Avenue
and the Broad Street bridge. The plan recommends
eliminations of gaps within the existing sidewalk
network, and that all sidewalks be brought to a
minimum width of four feet, with ADA-compliant ramps.
The plan also enhances bicycle connectivity, with a
goal of creating a gridded bicycle network spaced at a
maximum of ½ mile between on- or off-street paths.
Aligning with Regional Planning Commission goals,
Tulane Avenue will be upgraded as a ‘Smart Street’,
with below-grade utilities and above-grade traffic control
enabled for remote monitoring and adjustment. Above-
grade, improvements will feature wider sidewalks,
on-street bike lanes, street tree plantings and planted
medians. These softening streetscape features,
in particular, will contribute to social sustainability
through an enhanced pedestrian scale and environmental
sustainability through their air quality and ambient
temperature benefits.
Claiborne Avenue will be reconstructed to more closely
resemble the cross-section used south of the BioDistrict,
with a center median and enhanced back-of-curb
pedestrian zone. I-10 will be eliminated through this
section, with local and regional traffic using four travel
lanes in each direction. Without elevated superstructure,
the I-10 on- and off-ramps at Tulane and Cleveland Avenues
can also be removed, making additional land available
for redevelopment. On-street bike lanes and a potential
median-running streetcar will enhance transit options.
The Broad Street bridge, with a narrow sidewalk on only
one side, will be made more pedestrian- and bike-friendly
by reallocation of travel space within its current horizontal
footprint. The center median will be eliminated and the
travel lanes narrowed in order to provide ‘extra’ space to
construct a raised, multi-use pathway on both sides of the
bridge.
Vehicular Circulation
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 19/21
19
Transit Network
Bicycle & Pedestrian Circulation
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 20/21
Galvez Xavier/Gert Tulane/Canal AlliedHealth CivicCenter
Hospital 323,000 323000
Academic 2,001,500 477,000 641000 60,000 3179500
Residential 1057 115 550 1721
Retail 174,600 164,500 175,400 15,000 529,500RDOfficeLab 893,500 893,500
Office 688,500 464,000 1,152,500
RDSport 127,500 127,500
Civic 392500 392,500
SFnewdevelopment 1,195,600 2,854,500 1,439,400 641,000 467,500 6,598,000
dwellingunits 1057 115 550 0 0 1721
DevelopmentAreasUse Totals
BioDistrictDevelopment
20 June 2011Working Paper 8 Preferred Plan
Summary:
The table below aggregated 5-, 10- and 20-year numbers for each key development area, and for the BioDistrict as a
whole, represented as square feet.
Plan Summary
8/4/2019 Working Paper VIII
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/working-paper-viii 21/21
21