Wood_Applying Engineered Safety Approach in Project Planning
-
Upload
darren-wood-eit -
Category
Documents
-
view
123 -
download
1
Transcript of Wood_Applying Engineered Safety Approach in Project Planning
Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space
between photos and header
Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. SAND NO. 2014-15977PE
Applying Engineered Safety Approach in Project Planning
Proposed Project: Ground Subsidence RepairDarren Wood
2
Outline
Project Introduction and Objectives Condition Assessment
Site Survey Engineering Evaluation of Causes and Impacts
Develop Engineering Solution Risk Assessment and Mitigation
Analyze Hazards Associated With Work Identify Methods to Control Hazards to Reduce Risk
Develop Project Proposal
3
Project Introduction
Asphalt is subsiding at the south corner of the chemical storage yard located near Building C943
The area is adjacent to 3125 gallon capacity above-ground liquid nitrogen tank and along MANTL perimeter wall
Asphalt pavement has been repaired before but subsidence continues to occur
4
Project Objectives
Investigate underlying causes for the ground subsidence
Develop practical engineering solution to correct the problem
Apply engineered-safety principles
Schematic Site Plan
5
Condition Assessment
Area of approximately 11 feet by 28 feet contains a single ground squirrel tunnel entrance and six subsidence holes. Ground squirrel tunnel
entrance next to tank pad Subsidence holes 1-3 feet in
length, 6-15 inches wide, and 2-8 inches deep
Numerous ground squirrel tunnels in surrounding field
LNTank
6
Engineering Evaluation of Causes
Likely Causes of Ground Subsidence Collapsing ground squirrel
holes Rampant squirrel activities in
surrounding dirt field Decaying tree roots leaving
openings that are collapsing
Tunnels goingUnder MANTLPerimeter wall
7
Engineering Evaluation of Impacts
Potential Impacts of Further Deteriorating Condition Programmatic Impacts
Temporary loss of mission capability dependent on liquid nitrogen Safety risks due to settlement of LN tank foundation
Tripping injuries Tank or pipeline failure
Struck-by/fall-upon injuries BLEVE (boiling-liquid expanding vapor explosion). Liquid nitrogen density
0.8g/mL, nitrogen gas density 1.25g/L (that’s an expansion ratio of 694) Cryogenic exposure (liquid nitrogen boils at −196°C)
Frostbite Cryogenic burns Pulmonary edema Eye damage
8
Develop Engineering Solutions
Research bio-friendly ground squirrel control alternatives Interview subject matter experts in environmental and zoology fields
Talked to Robert Holland, SNL/CA Environmental Technical Professional Emailed Eric Krussman, San Francisco Zoo Assistant Curator
Internet research from pest control places, gardening groups, and government sites
Study engineering methods to repair subsiding area Talked to Anne Yang, SNL/CA Strategic Planner Research engineering and construction techniques for excavation and
backfill Recommended engineering solution
9
Proposed Engineering Solution
Phase 1: Set barrier fence to block migration of ground squirrels into storage yard Capture the existing ground squirrels Dig a trench around the MANTL wall and install galvanized
mesh screening to prevent ground squirrel access Ground squirrel burrows can go as deep as five feet in places, but a
four foot trench to install a four foot wide mesh should suffice as a deterrent
Entire wall not needed, only 50 foot length around problem area Galvanized mesh available at most hardware stores as a 4 foot wide
roll and is strong enough to keep squirrels out but won’t rust or otherwise degrade for several years
10
Proposed Engineering Solution
Phase 2: Repair asphalt pavement Remove asphalt pavement and excavate 4 feet down Install controlled low-strength concrete fill (flowable concrete
slurry) to fill the excavated area. Advantages of controlled low-strength concrete
Adequate strength to resist settling Self-compacting, starts as a liquid, thoroughly filling voids and cracks More efficient installation than compacted gravel fill Cost competitive with gravel fill Improves worker safety by reducing possible cave-ins
Lay down a new asphalt surface over fill Advantages of asphalt
Less expensive than concrete Matches surrounding chemical storage yard
11
Analyze Hazards Associated With Work Interview subject matter experts in safety
Mike Roth SNL/CA Industrial Hygienist John Hostak SNL/CA Safety Engineer
Hazard Analysis LN release
Construction work could damage piping or tank, causing leakage or failure Ground movement
Excavating and trenching next to LN tank and MANTL perimeter wall could cause soil to shift into excavated area
Could cause collapse or shifting of LN tank and/or MANTL perimeter wall
12
Identify Methods to Control Hazards to Reduce Risk
Risk Risk Mitigation MeasuresLiquid nitrogen release Empty LN tank during asphalt
pavement repairTank shift or fall Provide temporary brace to LN tank
and shore up excavated areaMANTL Wall shift or collapse in work area
Provide temporary support of MANTL perimeter wall during trench excavation
13
Develop Project Plan
Develop Project Charter Scope of work- proposed engineering solution Justification- engineering evaluation of impacts Risk mitigation plan- methods to control hazards Budget needs and optimal project schedule:
Estimated project cost= $100,000 Optimal schedule FY 15
Next step: Incorporate into FY 15 Funding Request
14
Questions?