Corel VideoStCorel-VideoStudio-Pro-X8-Reviewers-Guideudio Pro X8 Reviewers Guide
When an article is published we post the peer reviewers ... · Complete List of Authors: Antunes,...
Transcript of When an article is published we post the peer reviewers ... · Complete List of Authors: Antunes,...
BMJ Open is committed to open peer review. As part of this commitment we make the peer review
history of every article we publish publicly available.
When an article is published we post the peer reviewers’ comments and the authors’ responses
online. We also post the versions of the paper that were used during peer review. These are the
versions that the peer review comments apply to.
The versions of the paper that follow are the versions that were submitted during the peer review
process. They are not the versions of record or the final published versions. They should not be cited
or distributed as the published version of this manuscript.
BMJ Open is an open access journal and the full, final, typeset and author-corrected version of
record of the manuscript is available on our site with no access controls, subscription charges or pay-
per-view fees (http://bmjopen.bmj.com).
If you have any questions on BMJ Open’s open peer review process please email
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
Perceived effects of the economic recession on population mental health, well-being and provision of care by primary
care users and professionals: A qualitative study protocol
Journal: BMJ Open
Manuscript ID bmjopen-2017-017032
Article Type: Protocol
Date Submitted by the Author: 02-Apr-2017
Complete List of Authors: Antunes, Ana; Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC) Frasquilho, Diana; Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC) Silva, Manuela; Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC) Pereira, Nádia; Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon Cardoso, Graça; Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC) Caldas-de-Almeida, José Miguel; Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC) Ferrão, João; Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon
<b>Primary Subject Heading</b>:
Mental health
Secondary Subject Heading: Qualitative research
Keywords: MENTAL HEALTH, QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, PRIMARY CARE
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open on S
eptember 16, 2020 by guest. P
rotected by copyright.http://bm
jopen.bmj.com
/B
MJ O
pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017032 on 3 S
eptember 2017. D
ownloaded from
For peer review only
1
TITLE
Perceived effects of the economic recession on population mental health, well-
being and provision of care by primary care users and professionals: A
qualitative study protocol
Ana Antunes*, Diana Frasquilho, Graça Cardoso, Nádia Pereira, Manuela Silva, José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida, João Ferrão Ana Antunes*, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] Diana Frasquilho, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] Manuela Silva, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] Nádia Pereira, Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] Graça Cardoso, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Portugal.
[email protected] João Ferrão, Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] * Corresponding author Ana Antunes, NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Campo Mártires da Pátria, 130, 1169-056 Lisboa, Portugal E-mail: [email protected]
Word count: 3093
Page 1 of 13
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
2
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Economic recession periods can pose accentuated risks to population’s mental
health and well-being as well as additional threats to health systems. Users of health care and
health professionals are key stakeholders in care delivery; however, little attention has been
given to their experiences of the crisis. This paper presents a qualitative study protocol to
assess users’ and health professionals’ perceptions about the effects of the post-2008
economic recession on mental health and care delivery in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area,
Portugal.
Methods and analysis: A conceptual framework and methodology to assess perceived
effects of the economic recession by primary care users and professionals on population
mental health, well-being and provision of care is presented. Focus groups with users and
semi-structured interviews with health professionals will be carried out in three primary
health care units in Lisbon areas especially affected by the crisis. Thematic analysis of full
transcribed interviews will be conducted using an iterative and reflexive approach.
Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of
NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon. The findings will be useful for other
researchers and policymakers to develop and implement the assessment of prevailing
experiences of users and health professionals on the effects of the economic recession on
mental health and quality of care in primary health context, promoting their involvement and
contribution to services responsiveness.
Strengths and limitations
• Integration of the perspectives and experiences of two key informants: primary health care users and professionals
• Selection of primary health care centers in areas particularly affected by the economic crisis, based on key geographical indicators
• Studies about the impact of the economic crisis on mental health resorting to qualitative methods are scarce
• Dissemination of findings may contribute to redefine policy measures for better coordinated provision of care and efficiency improvement
Keywords: mental health, economic recession, qualitative research, user participation
Page 2 of 13
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
3
INTRODUCTION
In a period of economic recession, several health outcomes are likely to deteriorate,
particularly among those socially more vulnerable.[1] The potential negative effects of
economic recessions on mental health are likely to be more immediate and severe than those
on physical health and may include a higher proportion of mental health problems such as
common mental disorders, substance use disorders, and ultimately, suicidal behaviour.[1–4]
The latest economic recession that started in 2008 and affected many European
countries has hit hard Portugal and produced evident signs of economic contraction.[5] From
2011 to 2013 the country lost approximately 7% of GDP and the recession period was
characterized by rising deficits, which corresponded to 11.2% of GDP in 2010 and declined
to 4.4% in 2015, still above the 3% established limit of the European Union Stability and
Growth Pact.[6] Significant levels of government debt amounted 129% of GDP in 2013, a
value maintained in 2015.[7] The annual unemployment rate rose from 8.8% in 2008 up to
16.4%, one of the highest rates in Europe in 2013, declining to 12.6% in 2015, but still higher
than before the recession period.[8]
In 2011, Portugal had to reduce public spending while undergoing the financial
assistance programme from the European Union, the European Central Bank and the
International Monetary Fund (IMF), commonly known as Troika.[9] The memorandum
included an agreement to generate substantial cuts in the health system, which were achieved
through multiple ways, such as freezing or reducing salaries of health professionals and staff,
reducing existing staff and new hiring, increasing the number of patients per general
practitioner and reducing the amount paid for overtime work, as well as measures to reduce
demand of care by increasing co-payments. Nevertheless, broad co-payment exemptions in
health care delivery, based on several criteria such as economic deprivation, unemployment
and other vulnerable groups, may have reduced the impact of this measure.[5,10]
The economic recession, through its poor macroeconomic outlook and impact on the
economic, social and health system, is likely to have led to a deterioration of the mental
health of the population. This is particularly important considering that Portugal had already
one of the highest prevalence rates of mental disorders and mental health-related problems in
Europe before the recession (23%).[11] This scenario may have been further deteriorated by
changes in health care seeking behaviour and health care delivery due to problems such as
impoverishment, increased out-of-pocket payments in public services, and fear of
unemployment as a result of sick leave or time spent in health care.[10]
Page 3 of 13
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
4
Portugal, one of the European countries most affected by the economic crisis and
subsequent implementation of austerity measures, has been receiving proportionally less
attention regarding its population mental health and well-being consequences when compared
to other European countries, and studies on these matters are scarce.[5] Research on this
subject is increasingly relevant, mostly considering that appropriate policy responses may
ameliorate the potential rise of health and social inequalities in the Portuguese population.
The spill-over effects of the economic recession on mental health are difficult to
account for by quantitative measures. Thus, giving voice to users and health professionals is
imperative to better understand the economic crisis consequences and plan initiatives to
improve responsiveness of services, quality of care, and overall systems efficiency and
effectiveness.[12] Users and health professionals are major stakeholders in care delivery;
however, so far qualitative evidence of users and professionals’ experiences as result of
economic recession are very scarce and almost non-existent focusing mental health. This is,
to our knowledge, the first qualitative study in Portugal to explore, through the perceived
experiences of users and primary health care professionals, the effects of the current
economic recession on mental health of the population and on the health system.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
Aims and objectives
The current study will be conducted under the scope of the Mental Health Crisis
Impact Study – MH Crisis Impact, which benefits from a grant from the Public Health
Initiatives Programme (PT06), financed by EEA Grants Financial Mechanism 2009-2014.
The objective of this study is twofold: 1) to follow-up participants of the World Mental
Health Survey Initiative Portugal carried out in 2008,[11,13] and compare epidemiological
data on mental health disorders, their determinants and use of services, before and after the
economic crisis; 2) to explore users’ and primary care health professionals’ perceptions on
the impact of the economic recession on mental health of the population and on mental health
care delivery.
Study design and setting
Given the exploratory nature of this research study, different qualitative methods were
considered to determine the best data collection procedure to address the study aims. The
Page 4 of 13
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
5
research team decided that the best methods were interaction with users in a group setting
(focus group interviews) and direct interaction with professionals on a one to one basis
through semi-structured interviews.
Primary health care centres were found to be the best setting for data collection. These
are proximity units, where local communities go to address their primary health care needs. A
geographical delimitation based on the socioeconomic typology of the Lisbon Metropolitan
Area – LMA was considered in order to select primary health care units that were in areas of
higher probability of economic recession impact (Table 1).[14] Three case studies were
selected: a suburban area located in an old industrial metropolitan axis (Póvoa Santa Iria
UCSP); a suburban area located in a recent metropolitan expansion axis, which is largely
occupied by semi and unskilled services and industry workers (São Marcos USF); and a
consolidated urban area where there is a mix of middle class neighbourhoods and social
housing (Olivais USCP).
Two existing types of primary health care units were considered for the purpose:
Personalized Health Care Centres (UCSPs) and Family Health Units (USFs). Some aspects of
the organization of the primary health care service are important to point out. In 2005 a
comprehensive reform was initiated to increase the accessibility, quality and efficiency of
primary care services, and to improve quality and satisfaction of both users and
professionals.[15] This reform lead to the creation of groups of health centres (ACES), to
aggregate and improve management of resources and structures, which are responsible to
ensure the provision of primary care to the population of specific geographic regions.[15]
Family Health Units (USFs) are constituted by small and interdisciplinary public primary
health care teams that provide individual and family health care with organizational,
functional and technical autonomy.[15,16] Personalized Health Care Centres (UCSPs) have a
similar size than USFs, with multiprofessional teams as well, providing personalized access
to care.[15] The two types of units differ by management model. In comparison with UCSPs,
USFs are autonomous in their action plans, make use of professionals’ participation in
management, and have a financial incentive scheme associated with the activity. Also in the
scope of access, the ratio of users to family doctor is higher in the model USF; however if all
enrolled users are considered, and not only those who have a family doctor, there are more
users enrolled per doctor in the UCSP.[17] At the moment, the study was approved in Póvoa
Santa Iria UCSP and São Marcos USF. Approval to conduct the study in Olivais USCP
awaits confirmation.
Page 5 of 13
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
6
Table 1. Primary care units considered for study
Primary health care units
Póvoa Santa Iria UCSP2 São Marcos USF3 Olivais UCSP2
Geographic Coverage
Civil Parish Póvoa de Santa Iria and Forte da Casa
Cacém and São Marcos Olivais
Municipality Vila Franca de Xira Sintra Lisbon
Region LMA LMA LMA
Primary health care centre characteristics
Typology UCSP USF (B) UCSP
ACES1 Estuário do Tejo Sintra Lisboa Central
Population (users) 26.483 13.306 17.657
Nº doctors 7 7 6
Nº nurses 11 6 10
Nº technical/operational assistants
9 5 5
1 ACES: Aggregation of Health Centres (Agrupamento de Centros de Saúde) 2 Data from 2016 3 Data from 2014 LMA - Lisbon Metropolitan Area
Participants
The study will be presented by the research team to the board of each primary health
care centre. A chosen delegate from the board of the primary care centre will be appointed as
the key contact with the research team. The semi-structured interviews with health
professionals and focus group interviews with users will be conducted together with socio-
demographic surveys. The following characteristics will be considered as inclusion criteria of
participants: being at least 18 years old, having the ability to understand and communicate in
Portuguese, and being a user or professional at that health care centre.
Health professionals
All health professionals (e.g. medical doctors, nurses, social workers, psychologists)
will be contacted by the delegate of the collaborating primary health care centre, to present
the study and invite them for the semi-structured interviews.
Page 6 of 13
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
7
Users
The delegate of the primary health care centres will present the study and request the
participation of a random and heterogeneous sample of users. In case of agreement, the users
will be contacted directly by the research team, communicating the date of the focus group
and confirming their attendance.
Data collection procedures
The interviews will cover broad themes around the perceived effects of the economic
recession on mental health and well-being of the population, and also on the healthcare
system. Interviews and focus group will take place at the health care centres.
The focus group interviews (Table 2) with users will enable researchers to collect
information about the patients’ perceptions of the impact of the current economic crisis on
their personal, occupational and family well-being, as well as information about the access
and utilization of health care services and proposed suggestions for measures to alleviate the
impact of the economic crisis in daily life, mental health and well-being at the health care
centre level and at a national level.
Table 2. Users’ focus groups topic guide
Broad topics Specific topics
Recession related risk factors for mental health problems
Employment, family, economic, social, lifestyle and health areas.
Changes in mental health and well-being
Perceived increase in psychological distress and its impacts on daily life.
Help-seeking behaviours At ease to seek for help for mental health problems; If positive, where and who.
Health provision Satisfaction with health care solutions; perceived changes in health provision during the economic crisis.
Proposed solutions Proposed measures to alleviate the impact of the economic crisis in daily life, mental health and well-being.
The health professionals’ semi-structured interviews will follow a protocol similar to
other relevant research in the area of health systems,[18,19] and will focus on professionals’
views about the potential consequences of the economic crisis on mental health and well-
being of the population, possible key determinants, their experience on its impact on the
Page 7 of 13
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
8
health care system and delivery of care, and proposed policy-measures to improve health care
delivery at local and national level during the economic crisis (Table 3).
Table 3. Semi-structured interviews topic guide with health professionals
Broad topics Specific topics
Impact of the economic crisis in population mental health and well-being
Fluctuations in number of patients resorting to primary care; changes in health complaints; mental health problems; prescription of psychotropic medication; users’ social and economic complaints from the users.
Access to and quality of care Perceived changes in access and quality of care at local and national level; introduction of co-payments; short and long term impacts of austerity measures; changes in user's satisfaction.
Proposed Solutions Proposed policy-measures to improve population mental health, well-being, and access to and quality of care during the economic crisis.
Data analysis
All semi-structured interviews and focus groups will be transcribed verbatim,
analysed and codified, resorting to content analysis through an iterative and reflexive process.
Findings will emerge directly from raw data, based on an inductive approach. A hermeneutic
analysis of the transcripts, using constant comparison and category building procedures, will
allow the researchers to identify major themes supported with QSR NVivo 10 Software.[20]
An initial coding of the segments of the transcriptions, quotation by quotation, will be
conducted by two independent researchers following the protocol of Stemler and
collaborators.[21] The segments of coded text will be synthetized into categories and further
grouped into recurrent or most important themes.[22,23] The researchers will discuss on the
interpretation of the data and disagreements with a third researcher until consensus is
reached.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
The protocol of the MH Crisis Impact Study, in which this study is integrated, was
approved by the Ethics Committee of the NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of
Lisbon. An information sheet with a description of the study design and objectives will be
presented to all participants. Each participant will be given a written informed consent for the
Page 8 of 13
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
9
interview recordings and collected materials. All data will be anonymous and confidential.
Data protection will be ensured by separating audio records, transcripts, consents, and
questionnaires. Code linking data to individuals will be safely stored and only accessible to
the research team. Furthermore, the transcription process and dissemination of the study will
anonymise the participants in order to protect their identity. All study materials will be
subject to strict protection and only available to the research team members.
This qualitative approach will contribute to the current knowledge of the effects of the
economic crisis in Portugal on mental-ill health and well-being of the population. It will also
provide a better understanding to the follow-up epidemiological data on mental health
disorders and use of services. The added value of this study lies on its concern with
underlying values, perceptions, attitudes and behaviours related to mental health and
utilization of health care delivery of users and health professionals in the specific context of
an economic recession, in (sub)urban geographical areas particularly affected by its
consequences. Rigorous standards of qualitative research, namely credibility, dependability,
confirmability and transferability, will ensure that the findings obtained are consistent with
the methods of the interpretivist paradigm and its information sources.[23]
The combined perspectives of users (subjects and objects to which care is
administered) and health professionals, ensures that all views may contribute to help
redefining policy measures for better coordinated provision of care and efficiency
improvement.[24] The results will be published in international and national peer-reviewed
journals and presented in international conferences. Furthermore, the results will be
disseminated nationally in seminars directed to the general public, students and policy makers
in the health and social sectors.
In conclusion, this qualitative study will allow us to shed light on social and economic
processes associated with perceptions of health, well-being and use of services during the
economic crisis. Thus, it will provide an innovative contribution for policy-measures, both
place-based and nationally, to properly address the consequences of the economic recession
in Portugal.
Page 9 of 13
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
10
DECLARATIONS
Conflict of interest:
None.
Funding:
The present manuscript was granted by the Public Health Initiatives Programme (PT06),
financed by EEA Grants Financial Mechanism 2009-2014. For further information, please
visit http//www.eeagrants.gov.pt/.
Author’s contributions:
AA and DF conceptualised the design and drafted the paper. JMCA is the principal
investigator in the MH Crisis Impact study and oversaw all activities. JF coordinated the
study design and implementation. GC, NP and MS collaborated in the drafting and reviewing
this manuscript. All authors revised, reviewed and approved the final paper.
Acknowledgments:
Antunes A receives a grant from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology
(FCT), reference PD/BD/105822/2014.
The authors wish to thank Dr. Luís Pisco from ARS-LVT, Dr. Carla Abril from USCP Póva
de Santa Iria, Dr. Jorge Caixinhas from USF São Marcos and Dr. Bruno Heleno from NOVA
Medical School. Thanks are extended to all members of the MH Crisis Impact Study.
Page 10 of 13
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
11
REFERENCES
1 Marmot SM, Bloomer E, Goldblatt P. The Role of Social Determinants in Tackling
Health Objectives in a Context of Economic Crisis. Public Health Rev 2013;35:1–24.
2 Frasquilho D, Matos MG, Salonna F, et al. Mental health outcomes in times of
economic recession : a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health
2016;16(1):115 doi:10.1186/s12889-016-2720-y
3 Marmot M, Allen J, Bell R, et al. WHO European review of social determinants of
health and the health divide. Lancet 2012;380:1011–29. doi:10.1016/S0140-
6736(12)61228-8.
4 World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Impact of economic crisis on
mental health. Geneva: World Health Organization 2011.
www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/134999/e94837.pdf (accessed Feb
2017).
5 Legido-Quigley H, Karanikolos M, Hernandez-Plaza S, et al. Effects of the financial
crisis and Troika austerity measures on health and health care access in Portugal.
Health Policy 2016;120:833–9. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.04.009.
6 Angerer J. Stability and Growth Pact – An Overview of the Rules. European
Parliament 2015.
www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2014/528745/IPOL-
ECON_NT(2014)528745_EN.pdf (accessed Feb 2017).
7 OECD. National Accounts at a Glance 2015. OECD Publishing 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/na_glance-2015-en
8 Eurostat. Total unemployment - LFS series. Unemployment rates by sex, age and
nationality. 2017.www.ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lfs/data/database (accessed Feb
2017).
9 European Comission. The economic adjustment programme for Portugal 2011-2014.
2014. doi:10.2765/85246
10 World Health Organization. The impact of the financial crisis on the health system and
health in Portugal.Geneva: World Health Organization 2014.
11 Caldas-de-Almeida J, Xavier M, Cardoso G, et al. Estudo Epidemiológico Nacional de
Saúde Mental - 1.o Relatório [National Mental Health Epidemiological Study - 1st
Report]. Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas 2013.
12 Thornicroft G, Tansella M. Growing recognition of the importance of service user
Page 11 of 13
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
12
involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation. . Epidemiologia e
psichiatria sociale 2005;14(01):1-3.
13 Xavier M, Baptista H, Mendes JM, et al. Implementing the World Mental Health
Survey Initiative in Portugal - rationale, design and fieldwork procedures. Int J Ment
Health Syst 2013;7(1):19. doi:10.1186/1752-4458-7-19
14 Statistics Portugal. Tipologia socioeconómica das Áreas Metropolitanas de Lisboa e
Porto – 2011 [Socioeconomic typology of the Metropolitan Areas of Lisbon and
Oporto - 2011]. 2014.
www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_publicacoes&PUBLICACOESpub_
boui=219306706&PUBLICACOESmodo=2 (accessed Feb 2017).
15 Pisco L. Reforma da Atenção Primária em Portugal em duplo movimento : unidades
assistenciais autónomas de saúde familiar e gestão em agrupamentos de Centros de
Saúde Saúde [Primary Healthcare Reform in Portugal on two fronts : autonomous
family healthcare units and management of groupings of Health Centers]. Cien Saude
Colet 2011;16:2841–52.
16 Ministry of Health of Portugal. Diário da República: Despacho Normativo n.o 9/2006.
[Regulatory Order no. 9/2006] 2006.
17 Portuguese Healthcare Regulation Authority. Estudo sobre as Unidades de Saúde
Familiar e as Unidades de Cuidados de Saúde Personalizados [Study on family care
units and personalized care units]. 2016;119.
18 Cervero-Liceras F, McKee M, Legido-Quigley H. The effects of the financial crisis
and austerity measures on the Spanish health care system: A qualitative analysis of
health professionals’ perceptions in the region of Valencia. Health Policy
2015;119:100–6. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.11.003
19 Heras-Mosteiro J, Sanz-Barbero B, Otero-Garcia L. Health Care Austerity Measures in
Times of Crisis : The Perspectives of Primary Health Care Physicians in Madrid.
Spain. Int. J. Health Serv 2016;46(2):283-99. doi:10.1177/0020731415625251
20 Castleberry A. NVivo 10 [software program]. Version 10. QSR International; 2012.
Am J Pharm Educ 2014;78(1):1–2. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2012.10.004
21 Stemler S, Colors P. An overview of content analysis - Practical Assessment, Research
& Evaluation 2001;7(17):1–6.
22 Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative
evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. Health serv res
2005;10:6–20. doi: 10.1258/1355819054308576.
Page 12 of 13
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
13
23 Ulin PR, Robinson ET, Tolley EE. Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field
Guide for Applied Research 1st ed. Jossey-Bass 2005.
24 Lawn S. Integrating service user participation in mental health care: What will it take?
Int J Integr Care 2015;15:2–6. doi: 10.5334/ijic.1992.
Page 13 of 13
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
Perceived effects of the economic recession on population mental health, well-being and provision of care by primary
care users and professionals: A qualitative study protocol in Portugal
Journal: BMJ Open
Manuscript ID bmjopen-2017-017032.R1
Article Type: Protocol
Date Submitted by the Author: 10-May-2017
Complete List of Authors: Antunes, Ana; Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC) Frasquilho, Diana; Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC) Silva, Manuela; Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC) Pereira, Nádia; Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon Cardoso, Graça; Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC) Caldas-de-Almeida, José Miguel; Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC) Ferrão, João; Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon
<b>Primary Subject Heading</b>:
Mental health
Secondary Subject Heading: Qualitative research
Keywords: MENTAL HEALTH, QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, PRIMARY CARE
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open on S
eptember 16, 2020 by guest. P
rotected by copyright.http://bm
jopen.bmj.com
/B
MJ O
pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017032 on 3 S
eptember 2017. D
ownloaded from
For peer review only
1
TITLE
Perceived effects of the economic recession on population mental health, well-
being and provision of care by primary care users and professionals: A
qualitative study protocol in Portugal
Ana Antunes*, Diana Frasquilho, Graça Cardoso, Nádia Pereira, Manuela Silva, José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida, João Ferrão Ana Antunes*, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] Diana Frasquilho, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] Manuela Silva, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] Nádia Pereira, Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] Graça Cardoso, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Portugal.
[email protected] João Ferrão, Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] * Corresponding author Ana Antunes, NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Campo Mártires da Pátria, 130, 1169-056 Lisboa, Portugal E-mail: [email protected]
Word count: 2710
Page 1 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
2
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Economic recession periods can pose accentuated risks to population’s mental
health and well-being as well as additional threats to health systems. Users and health
professionals are key stakeholders in care delivery; however, little attention has been given to
their experiences of the crisis. This paper presents a qualitative study protocol to assess users’
and health professionals’ perceptions about the effects of the post-2008 economic recession
on mental health and care delivery in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, Portugal.
Methods and analysis: A conceptual framework and methodology to assess perceived
effects of the economic recession by primary care users and professionals on population
mental health, well-being and provision of care is presented. Focus groups with users and
semi-structured interviews with health professionals will be carried out in three primary
health care units in Lisbon areas especially affected by the crisis. Thematic analysis of full
transcribed interviews will be conducted using an iterative and reflexive approach.
Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of
NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon. The findings will be useful for other
researchers and policymakers to develop and implement the assessment of prevailing
experiences of users and health professionals on the effects of the economic recession on
mental health and quality of care in primary health context, promoting their involvement and
contribution to services responsiveness.
Strengths and limitations
• Integration of the perspectives and experiences of two key informants: primary health care users and professionals
• Selection of primary health care centres from areas particularly affected by the economic crisis, based on key geographical indicators
• Studies about the impact of the economic crisis on mental health resorting to qualitative methods are scarce
• Dissemination of findings may contribute to redefine policy measures for better coordinated provision of care and efficiency improvement
Keywords: mental health, economic recession, qualitative research, user participation
Page 2 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
3
INTRODUCTION
In a period of economic recession, several health outcomes are likely to deteriorate,
particularly among those socially more vulnerable.[1] The potential negative effects of
economic recessions on mental health are likely to be more immediate and severe than those
on physical health and may include a higher proportion of mental health problems such as
common mental disorders, substance use disorders, and ultimately, suicidal behaviour.[1–4]
The latest economic recession that started in 2008 and affected many European
countries has hit hard Portugal and produced evident signs of economic contraction.[5] From
2011 to 2013 the country lost approximately 7% of GDP and the recession period was
characterized by rising deficits, which corresponded to 11.2% of GDP in 2010 and declined
to 4.4% in 2015, still above the 3% established limit of the European Union Stability and
Growth Pact.[6] Significant levels of government debt amounted 129% of GDP in 2013, a
value maintained in 2015.[7] The annual unemployment rate rose from 8.8% in 2008 up to
16.4%, one of the highest rates in Europe in 2013, declining to 12.6% in 2015, but still higher
than before the recession period.[8]
In 2011, Portugal had to reduce public spending while undergoing the financial
assistance programme from the European Union, the European Central Bank and the
International Monetary Fund (IMF), commonly known as Troika.[9] The memorandum
included an agreement to generate substantial cuts in the health system, which were achieved
through multiple ways, such as freezing or reducing salaries of health professionals and staff,
reducing existing staff and new hiring, increasing the number of patients per general
practitioner and reducing the amount paid for overtime work, as well as measures to reduce
demand of care by increasing co-payments. Nevertheless, broad co-payment exemptions in
health care delivery, based on several criteria such as economic deprivation, unemployment
and other vulnerable groups, may have reduced the impact of this measure.[5,10]
The economic recession, through its poor macroeconomic outlook and impact on the
economic, social and health system, is likely to have led to a deterioration of the mental
health of the population, through identified risk factors such as unemployment, precarious
working conditions, debt and higher levels of inequality.[11] In fact, current epidemiological
evidence indicates that, among several health outcomes, the impact of the economic recession
was more consistent regarding mental health and suicide.[12] Overall, studies in Southern
European countries, such as Greece, Spain and Italy, indicate an association between
deteriorating economic indicators and poor mental health, although the results should be
Page 3 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
4
cautiously interpreted.[12] Most studies show an increase in the prevalence of mental health
problems, for which economic hardship, employment insecurity and unemployment were
found to be important contributors.[13–17]
Portugal, one of the European countries most affected by the economic crisis and
subsequent implementation of austerity measures, has received proportionally less attention
regarding its population mental health and well-being consequences when compared to other
European countries.[5] For instance, in a recent systematic review of the evidence on the
health outcomes during the economic crisis in Europe, no studies conducted in Portugal were
included.[12] This is particularly important considering that Portugal had already one of the
highest prevalence rates of mental disorders in Europe, with a 22.9% prevalence of any 12-
month mental disorders before the recession.[18] This scenario may have been further
deteriorated by changes in health care seeking behaviour and health care delivery due to
problems such as impoverishment, increased out-of-pocket payments in public services, and
fear of unemployment as a result of sick leave or time spent in health care.[10] Research on
this subject is increasingly relevant, due to the need to evaluate the specific needs of the
Portuguese context that will support appropriate policy responses aiming at ameliorating the
potential rise of health and social inequalities in the population.
In the context of the Portuguese National Health Service, primary health care
professionals have a crucial role as gatekeepers of the health system. Therefore, it is a key
action to continually promote primary health care as the first line of the health system to
provide care for mental health problems, by ensuring access and quality of care, as well as
guaranteeing adequate cooperation between primary care and specialized mental health
services.[11] Thus, giving voice to users and health professionals is imperative to better
understand the economic crisis consequences and plan initiatives to improve responsiveness
of services, quality of care, and overall systems efficiency and effectiveness.[19] Users and
health professionals are major stakeholders in care delivery; however, so far qualitative
evidence of users and professionals’ experiences as result of economic recession are very
scarce and almost non-existent focusing mental health, with exception of two qualitative
studies conducted in Spain with health professionals.[20,21] To our knowledge, this is the
first qualitative study to explore the effects of the current economic recession on mental
health of the population and on the health system, through the perceived experiences of both
users and primary health care professionals, which may contribute to the design of innovative
policies addressing the health and social impact of the economic recession.
Page 4 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
5
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
Aims and objectives
The current study will be conducted under the scope of the Mental Health Crisis
Impact Study – MH Crisis Impact, which benefits from a grant from the Public Health
Initiatives Programme (PT06), financed by EEA Grants Financial Mechanism 2009-2014.
The objective of this study is twofold: 1) to follow-up participants of the World Mental
Health Survey Initiative Portugal carried out in 2008,[18,22] and compare epidemiological
data on mental health disorders, their determinants and use of services, before and after the
economic crisis; 2) to explore users’ and primary care health professionals’ perceptions on
the impact of the economic recession on mental health of the population and on primary care
and mental health care delivery. This study protocol presents the qualitative study designed to
fulfil the second objective, which will complement the quantitative data obtained through the
epidemiological survey, to provide a comprehensive assessment of the impact of the
economic crisis.
Study design and setting
Given the exploratory nature of this research study, different qualitative methods were
considered to determine the best data collection procedure to address the study aims. The
research team decided that the best methods were interaction with users in a group setting
(focus group interviews) and direct interaction with professionals on a one to one basis
through semi-structured interviews. Focus groups were considered the adequate data
collection methods among users due to the need to obtain a diverse array of perspectives and
given the interest in the comparisons made by the participants between their experiences. The
decision to conduct semi-structured interviews was made after consulting with health care
professionals, who referred they might not feel fully comfortable sharing their honest opinion
in the presence of other colleagues.
Primary health care centres were found to be the best setting for data collection. These
are proximity units, where local communities go to address their primary health care needs. A
geographical delimitation based on an evaluation of the municipalities more affected by the
crisis[23] and the socioeconomic typology of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area (LMA)[24] were
considered in order to select primary health care units in areas of higher probability of
Page 5 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
6
economic recession impact. Three case studies were selected: a suburban area located in an
old industrial metropolitan axis (Póvoa Santa Iria UCSP); a suburban area located in a recent
metropolitan expansion axis, which is largely occupied by semi and unskilled services and
industry workers (São Marcos USF); and a consolidated urban area where there is a mix of
middle class neighbourhoods and social housing (Olivais USCP) (Table 1).
Two existing types of primary health care units were considered for the purpose:
Personalized Health Care Centres (UCSPs) and Family Health Units (USFs). It is important
to point out some aspects of the organization of the primary health care service. In 2005 a
comprehensive reform was initiated to increase the accessibility, quality and efficiency of
primary care services, and to improve quality and satisfaction of both users and
professionals.[25] This reform led to the creation of groups of health centres (ACES), to
aggregate and improve management of resources and structures, which are responsible to
ensure the provision of primary care to the population of specific geographic regions.[24]
Family Health Units (USFs) are constituted by small and interdisciplinary public primary
health care teams that provide individual and family health care with organizational,
functional and technical autonomy.[25,26] Personalized Health Care Centres (UCSPs) have a
similar size than USFs, with multiprofessional teams as well, providing personalized access
to care.[25] The two types of units differ by management model. In comparison with UCSPs,
USFs are autonomous in their action plans, make use of professionals’ participation in
management, and have a financial incentive scheme associated with the activity. In relation to
access, the ratio of users to family doctor is higher in the model USF; however if all enrolled
users are considered, and not only those who have a family doctor, there are more users
enrolled per doctor in the UCSP.[27] At the moment, the study was approved in Póvoa Santa
Iria UCSP and São Marcos USF and conditionally approved in Olivais USCP.
Page 6 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
7
Table 1. Primary care units considered for study
Primary health care units
Póvoa Santa Iria UCSP2 São Marcos USF3 Olivais UCSP2
Geographic Coverage
Civil Parish Póvoa de Santa Iria and Forte da Casa
Cacém and São Marcos Olivais
Municipality Vila Franca de Xira Sintra Lisbon
Region LMA LMA LMA
Primary health care centre characteristics
Typology UCSP USF (B) UCSP
ACES1 Estuário do Tejo Sintra Lisboa Central
Population (users) 26.483 13.306 17.657
Nº doctors 7 7 6
Nº nurses 11 6 10
Nº technical/operational assistants
9 5 5
1 ACES: Aggregation of Health Centres (Agrupamento de Centros de Saúde) 2 Data from 2016 3 Data from 2014 LMA - Lisbon Metropolitan Area
Participants
The study will be presented by the research team to the board of each primary health
care centre. A chosen delegate from the board of the primary care centre will be appointed as
the key contact with the research team. The semi-structured interviews with health
professionals and focus group interviews with users will be conducted together with socio-
demographic surveys. The following characteristics will be considered as inclusion criteria of
participants: being at least 18 years old, having the ability to understand and communicate in
Portuguese, and being a user or professional at that health care centre.
Health professionals
All health professionals (e.g. medical doctors, nurses, social workers, psychologists)
will be contacted by the delegate of the collaborating primary health care centre, for the study
to be presented to them and, in case of agreement, to be invited for the semi-structured
interviews.
Page 7 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
8
Users
A convenience sample of users will be invited to participate in the study by the
delegate of the primary health care centre. In case of agreement, the users will be contacted
directly by the research team, communicating the date of the focus group and confirming
their attendance.
Data collection procedures
The interviews will cover broad themes around the perceived effects of the economic
recession on mental health and well-being of the population, and also on the healthcare
system.
Interviews and focus groups will take place at the health care centres. The topics covered by
the focus groups (Table 2) were based on literature regarding the main risk factors for mental
health problems during the economic crisis and barriers in services access.[2,11,12,28,29]
This approach will enable the researchers to collect information about the patients’
perceptions of the impact of the current economic crisis on their personal, occupational and
family well-being, as well as information about the access and utilization of health care
services and proposed suggestions for measures to alleviate the impact of the economic crisis
in daily life, mental health and well-being at the health care centre level and at a national
level.
Table 2. Users’ focus groups topic guide
Broad topics Specific topics
Recession related risk factors for mental health problems
Employment, family, economic, social, lifestyle and health areas.
Changes in mental health and well-being
Perceived increase in psychological distress and its impacts on daily life.
Help-seeking behaviours At ease to seek for help for mental health problems; If positive, where and who.
Health provision Satisfaction with health care solutions; perceived changes in health provision during the economic crisis.
Proposed solutions Proposed measures to alleviate the impact of the economic crisis in daily life, mental health and well-being.
Page 8 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
9
The health professionals’ semi-structured interviews will follow a protocol similar to
other relevant research in the area of health systems,[20,21] and will focus on professionals’
views about the potential consequences of the economic crisis on mental health and well-
being of the population, possible key determinants, their experience on its impact on the
health care system and delivery of care, and proposed policy-measures to improve health care
delivery at local and national level during the economic crisis (Table 3). The semi-structured
interview and the focus group questions have been already piloted on a selected group of
respondents to assess the adequacy of research questions.
Table 3. Semi-structured interviews topic guide with health professionals
Broad topics Specific topics
Impact of the economic crisis in population mental health and well-being
Fluctuations in number of patients resorting to primary care; changes in health complaints; mental health problems; prescription of psychotropic medication; users’ social and economic complaints from the users.
Access to and quality of care Perceived changes in access and quality of care at local and national level; introduction of co-payments; short and long term impacts of austerity measures; changes in user's satisfaction.
Proposed Solutions Proposed policy-measures to improve population mental health, well-being, and access to and quality of care during the economic crisis.
The study design was conceived taken into consideration the recommended principles of data
saturation, which indicate that the number of focus groups necessary to reach thematic
saturation may vary from three to five, which, however, does not constitute a standard.[30]
Concerning health professionals, given the differences in professional backgrounds among
the participants, interviews are planned to be carried out until thematic saturation is reached.
Thematic saturation is considered when new concepts and themes no longer emerge from the
data.[31]
Data analysis
All semi-structured interviews and focus groups will be transcribed verbatim,
analysed and codified, resorting to content analysis through an iterative and reflexive process.
Findings will emerge directly from raw data, based on an inductive approach. A hermeneutic
Page 9 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
10
analysis of the transcripts, using constant comparison and category building procedures, will
allow the researchers to identify major themes supported with QSR NVivo 10 Software.[32]
An initial coding of the segments of the transcriptions, quotation by quotation, will be
conducted by two independent researchers following the protocol of Stemler and
collaborators.[33] The segments of coded text will be synthetized into categories and further
grouped into recurrent or most important themes.[34,35] In a first approach, focus groups and
semi-structured interviews will be analysed separately, through a detailed description and
interpretation of the main themes. In a subsequent approach, comparative and relational
analysis from the focus groups and semi-structured interviews will be carried out, in order to
identify how the perspectives of users and health professionals may converge or diverge in
specific subjects. The researchers will discuss on the interpretation of the data and
disagreements with a third researcher until consensus is reached. Findings will be reported
following the COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research)
guidelines.[36]
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
The protocol of the MH Crisis Impact Study, in which this study is integrated, was
approved by the Ethics Committee of the NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of
Lisbon. An information sheet with a description of the study design and objectives will be
presented to all participants. Each participant will be given a written informed consent for the
interview recordings and collected materials. All data will be anonymous and confidential.
Data protection will be ensured by separating audio records, transcripts, consents, and
questionnaires. Code linking data to individuals will be safely stored and only accessible to
the research team. Furthermore, the transcription process and dissemination of the study will
anonymise the participants as a way of protecting their identity. All study materials will be
subject to strict protection and only available to the research team members.
This qualitative approach will contribute to the current knowledge of the effects of the
economic crisis in Portugal on mental-ill health and well-being of the population. It will also
provide a better understanding to the follow-up epidemiological data on mental health
disorders and use of services. The added value of this study lies on its concern with
underlying values, perceptions, attitudes and behaviours related to mental health and
Page 10 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
11
utilization of health care delivery of users and health professionals in the specific context of
an economic recession, in (sub)urban geographical areas particularly affected by its
consequences. Rigorous standards of qualitative research, namely credibility, dependability,
confirmability and transferability, will ensure that the findings obtained are consistent with
the methods of the interpretivist paradigm and its information sources.[35] The limitations of
the present study are related to the research method itself, since the findings cannot be
extrapolated to other contexts. Another potential limitation anticipated by the researchers is
the possibility of over-representation of certain groups, such as retired or unemployed people,
which are more likely to participate in the focus groups.
The combined perspectives of users (subjects and objects to which care is
administered) and health professionals, ensures that all views may contribute to help
redefining policy measures for better coordinated provision of care and efficiency
improvement.[37] The results will be published in international and national peer-reviewed
journals and presented in international conferences. Furthermore, the results will be
disseminated nationally in seminars directed to the general public, students and policy makers
in the health and social sectors and will contribute to the development of policy
recommendations, under the objectives of the MH Crisis Impact Study.
In conclusion, this qualitative study will allow us to shed light on social and economic
processes associated with perceptions of health, well-being and use of services during the
economic crisis. Thus, it will provide an innovative contribution for policy-measures, both
place-based and nationally, to properly address the consequences of the economic recession
in Portugal.
Page 11 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
12
DECLARATIONS
Conflict of interest:
None.
Funding:
The present manuscript was granted by the Public Health Initiatives Programme (PT06),
financed by EEA Grants Financial Mechanism 2009-2014. For further information, please
visit http//www.eeagrants.gov.pt/.
Author’s contributions:
AA and DF conceptualised the design and drafted the paper. JMCA is the principal
investigator in the MH Crisis Impact study and oversaw all activities. JF coordinated the
study design and implementation. GC, NP and MS collaborated in the drafting and reviewing
this manuscript. All authors revised, reviewed and approved the final paper.
Acknowledgments:
Antunes A receives a grant from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology
(FCT), reference PD/BD/105822/2014.
The authors wish to thank Dr. Luís Pisco from ARS-LVT, Dr. Carla Abril from USCP Póva
de Santa Iria, Dr. Jorge Caixinhas from USF São Marcos, Teresa Santos and Dr. Bruno
Heleno from NOVA Medical School. Thanks are extended to all members of the MH Crisis
Impact Study.
Page 12 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
13
References
1 Marmot SM, Bloomer E, Goldblatt P. The Role of Social Determinants in Tackling
Health Objectives in a Context of Economic Crisis. Public Health Rev 2013;35:1–24.
2 Frasquilho D, Matos MG, Salonna F, et al. Mental health outcomes in times of
economic recession : a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health Published
Online First: 2016. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-2720-y
3 Marmot M, Allen J, Bell R, et al. WHO European review of social determinants of
health and the health divide. Lancet 2012;380:1011–29. doi:10.1016/S0140-
6736(12)61228-8
4 World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Impact of economic crisis on
mental health. 2011.
http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/134999/e94837.pdf (accessed
Feb 2017).
5 Legido-Quigley H, Karanikolos M, Hernandez-Plaza S, et al. Effects of the financial
crisis and Troika austerity measures on health and health care access in Portugal.
Health Policy (New York) 2016;120:833–9. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.04.009
6 Angerer J. Stability and Growth Pact – An Overview of the Rules. European
Parliament 2015.
www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2014/528745/IPOL-
ECON_NT(2014)528745_EN.pdf (accessed Feb 2017).
7 OECD. National Accounts at a Glance 2015. OECD Publishing 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/na_glance-2015-en
8 Eurostat. Total unemployment - LFS series. Unemployment rates by sex, age and
nationality. 2017.http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lfs/data/database (accessed Feb
2017).
9 European Comission. The economic adjustment programme for Portugal 2011-2014.
2014. doi:10.2765/85246
10 World Health Organization. The impact of the financial crisis on the health system and
health in Portugal.Geneva: World Health Organization 2014.
11 Martin-Carrasco M, Evans-Lacko S, Dom G, et al. EPA guidance on mental health and
economic crises in Europe. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2016;266:89–124.
doi:10.1007/s00406-016-0681-x
12 Parmar D, Stavropoulou C, Ioannidis JPA. Health outcomes during the 2008 financial
Page 13 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
14
crisis in Europe: systematic literature review. BMJ 2016;354:i4588.
13 Fiori F, Rinesi F, Spizzichino D, et al. Employment insecurity and mental health
during the economic recession: An analysis of the young adult labour force in Italy.
Soc Sci Med 2016;153:90–8. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.010
14 Economou M, Angelopoulos E, Peppou LE, et al. Enduring financial crisis in Greece:
prevalence and correlates of major depression and suicidality. Soc Psychiatry
Psychiatr Epidemiol 2016;51:1015–24. doi:10.1007/s00127-016-1238-z
15 Drydakis N. The effect of unemployment on self-reported health and mental health in
Greece from 2008 to 2013: A longitudinal study before and during the financial crisis.
Soc Sci Med 2015;128:43–51. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.025
16 Gili M, Roca M, Basu S, et al. The mental health risks of economic crisis in Spain:
evidence from primary care centres, 2006 and 2010. Eur J Public Health 2013;23:103–
8. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cks035
17 Urbanos-Garrido RM, Lopez-Valcarcel BG. The influence of the economic crisis on
the association between unemployment and health: an empirical analysis for Spain.
Eur J Heal Econ 2015;16:175–84. doi:10.1007/s10198-014-0563-y
18 Caldas-de-Almeida J, Xavier M, Cardoso G, et al. Estudo Epidemiológico Nacional de
Saúde Mental - 1.o Relatório [National Mental Health Epidemiological Study - 1st
Report]. Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas 2013.
19 Thornicroft G, Tansella M. Growing recognition of the importance of service user
involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation. 2005;14(01):1-3.
20 Heras-Mosteiro J, Sanz-Barbero B, Otero-Garcia L. Health Care Austerity Measures in
Times of Crisis : The Perspectives of Primary Health Care Physicians in Madrid.
Spain. Int. J. Health Serv 2016;46(2):283-99. doi:10.1177/0020731415625251
21 Cervero-Liceras F, McKee M, Legido-Quigley H. The effects of the financial crisis
and austerity measures on the Spanish health care system: A qualitative analysis of
health professionals’ perceptions in the region of Valencia. Health Policy
2015;119:100–6. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.11.003
22 Xavier M, Baptista H, Mendes JM, et al. Implementing the World Mental Health
Survey Initiative in Portugal - rationale, design and fieldwork procedures. Int J Ment
Health Syst 2013;7:19. doi:10.1186/1752-4458-7-19
23 Ferrão J. Território [Territory]. In: Portugal Social de A a Z: Temas em aberto.
Impresa Publishing 2013. 245–60.
24 Statistics Portugal. Tipologia socioeconómica das Áreas Metropolitanas de Lisboa e
Page 14 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
15
Porto – 2011 [Socioeconomic typology of the Metropolitan Areas of Lisbon and
Oporto - 2011]. 2014.
www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_publicacoes&PUBLICACOESpub_
boui=219306706&PUBLICACOESmodo=2 (accessed Feb 2017).
25 Pisco L. Reforma da Atenção Primária em Portugal em duplo movimento : unidades
assistenciais autónomas de saúde familiar e gestão em agrupamentos de Centros de
Saúde Saúde [Primary Healthcare Reform in Portugal on two fronts : autonomous
family healthcare units and management of groupings of Health Centers]. Cien Saude
Colet 2011;16:2841–52.
26 Ministry of Health of Portugal. Diário da República: Despacho Normativo n.o 9/2006.
[Regulatory Order no. 9/2006] 2006.
27 Portuguese Healthcare Regulation Authority. Estudo sobre as Unidades de Saúde
Familiar e as Unidades de Cuidados de Saúde Personalizados [Study on family care
units and personalized care units]. 2016;119.
28 Marmot SM, Bloomer E, Goldblatt P. The Role of Social Determinants in Tackling
Health Objectives in a Context of Economic Crisis. Public Health Rev 2013;35:1–24.
29 Andrade LH, Alonso J, Mneimneh Z, et al. Barriers to Mental Health Treatment:
Results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys. Psychol Med
2014;44:1303–17. doi:10.1017/S0033291713001943.
30 Morgan DL. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Sage Research Methods 2013;32–
46. doi:10.4135/9781412984287
31 Flick U. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. Sage 2011.
doi:10.4135/9781446282243.n33
32 Castleberry A. NVivo 10 [software program]. Version 10. QSR International; 2012.
Am J Pharm Educ 2014;78:1–2. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2012.10.004
33 Stemler S, Colors P. An overview of content analysis - Practical Assessment, Research
& Evaluation. 2001;7:1–6.
34 Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative
evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. Health serv res
2005;10:6–20. doi: 10.1258/1355819054308576.
35 Ulin PR, Robinson ET, Tolley EE. Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field
Guide for Applied Research 1st ed. Jossey-Bass 2005.
36 Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criterio for reporting qualitative research
(COREQ): a 32- item checklist for interviews and focus group. Int J Qual Heal Care
Page 15 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
16
2007;19:349–57. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
37 Lawn S. Integrating service user participation in mental health care: What will it take?
Int J Integr Care 2015;15:2–6. doi: 10.5334/ijic.1992.
Page 16 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
Perceived effects of the economic recession on population mental health, well-being and provision of care by primary
care users and professionals: A qualitative study protocol in Portugal
Journal: BMJ Open
Manuscript ID bmjopen-2017-017032.R2
Article Type: Protocol
Date Submitted by the Author: 13-Jun-2017
Complete List of Authors: Antunes, Ana; Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC) Frasquilho, Diana; Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC) Silva, Manuela; Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC) Pereira, Nádia; Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon Cardoso, Graça; Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC) Caldas-de-Almeida, José Miguel; Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC) Ferrão, João; Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon
<b>Primary Subject Heading</b>:
Mental health
Secondary Subject Heading: Qualitative research
Keywords: MENTAL HEALTH, QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, PRIMARY CARE
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open on S
eptember 16, 2020 by guest. P
rotected by copyright.http://bm
jopen.bmj.com
/B
MJ O
pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017032 on 3 S
eptember 2017. D
ownloaded from
For peer review only
1
TITLE
Perceived effects of the economic recession on population mental health, well-
being and provision of care by primary care users and professionals: A
qualitative study protocol in Portugal
Ana Antunes*, Diana Frasquilho, Graça Cardoso, Nádia Pereira, Manuela Silva, José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida, João Ferrão Ana Antunes*, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] Diana Frasquilho, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] Manuela Silva, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] Nádia Pereira, Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] Graça Cardoso, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Portugal.
[email protected] João Ferrão, Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Portugal. [email protected] * Corresponding author Ana Antunes, NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Campo Mártires da Pátria, 130, 1169-056 Lisboa, Portugal E-mail: [email protected]
Word count: 2863
Page 1 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
2
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Economic recession periods can pose accentuated risks to population’s mental
health and well-being as well as additional threats to health systems. Users and health
professionals are key stakeholders in care delivery; however, little attention has been given to
their experiences of the crisis. This paper presents a qualitative study protocol to assess users’
and health professionals’ perceptions about the effects of the post-2008 economic recession
on mental health and care delivery in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, Portugal.
Methods and analysis: The methodology to assess perceived effects of the economic
recession by primary care users and professionals on population mental health, well-being
and provision of care is presented. Focus groups with users and semi-structured interviews
with health professionals will be carried out in three primary health care units in Lisbon areas
especially affected by the crisis. Thematic analysis of full transcribed interviews will be
conducted using an iterative and reflexive approach.
Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of
NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon. The findings will be useful for other
researchers and policymakers to develop and implement the assessment of prevailing
experiences of users and health professionals on the effects of the economic recession on
mental health and quality of care in primary health context, promoting their involvement and
contribution to services responsiveness.
Strengths and limitations
• Integration of the perspectives and experiences of two key informants: primary health care users and professionals
• Selection of primary health care centres from areas particularly affected by the economic crisis, based on key geographical indicators
• Studies about the impact of the economic crisis on mental health using qualitative methods are scarce
• Dissemination of findings may contribute to redefine policy measures for better coordinated provision of care and efficiency improvement
Keywords: mental health, economic recession, qualitative research, user participation
Page 2 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
3
INTRODUCTION
In a period of economic recession, several health outcomes are likely to deteriorate,
particularly among those socially more vulnerable.[1] The potential negative effects of
economic recessions on mental health are likely to be more immediate and severe than those
on physical health and may include a higher proportion of mental health problems such as
common mental disorders, substance use disorders, and ultimately, suicidal behaviour.[1–5]
The latest economic recession that started in 2008 and affected many European
countries has hit hard Portugal and produced evident signs of economic contraction.[6] From
2011 to 2013 the country lost approximately 7% of GDP and the recession period was
characterized by rising deficits, which corresponded to 11.2% of GDP in 2010 and declined
to 4.4% in 2015, still above the 3% established limit of the European Union Stability and
Growth Pact.[7] Significant levels of government debt amounted 129% of GDP in 2013, a
value maintained in 2015.[8] The annual unemployment rate rose from 8.8% in 2008 up to
16.4%, one of the highest rates in Europe in 2013, declining to 12.6% in 2015, but still higher
than before the recession period.[9]
In 2011, Portugal had to reduce public spending while undergoing the financial
assistance programme from the European Union, the European Central Bank and the
International Monetary Fund (IMF), commonly known as Troika.[10] The memorandum
included an agreement to generate substantial cuts in the health system, which were achieved
through multiple ways, such as freezing or reducing salaries of health professionals and staff,
reducing existing staff and new hiring, increasing the number of patients per general
practitioner and reducing the amount paid for overtime work, as well as measures to reduce
demand of care by increasing co-payments. Nevertheless, broad co-payment exemptions in
health care delivery, based on several criteria such as economic deprivation, unemployment
and other vulnerable groups, may have reduced the impact of this measure.[6,11]
The economic recession, through its poor macroeconomic outlook and impact on the
economic, social and health system, is likely to have led to a deterioration of the mental
health of the Portuguese population. Studies in other Southern European countries indicate
that changes in socioeconomic conditions, such as economic hardship, job insecurity and
unemployment have a detrimental effect on mental health.[5,12–16] At the health-system
level, the additional pressures due to cuts in public funding are likely to endanger the health
system performance, affecting both demand (e.g. out-of-pocket payments) and provision of
care (e.g. cuts in human resources).[11,17] Therefore,despite increasing needs, the economic
Page 3 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
4
crisis may exacerbate existing problems and add new ones to the health systems, creating
additional challenges to the provision of care.[18]
It is important to aknowledge that the consequences of the economic crisis are likely
to vary across countries, with health system responses reflecting differences in context,
economic situation, type of welfare state and policy choices. Therefore, to design appropriate
policy recommendations, the specificty of each country and of its responses to the economic
crisis must be previously assessed.[17]
Portugal, one of the European countries most affected by the economic crisis and
subsequent implementation of austerity measures, has received proportionally less attention
regarding its population mental health and well-being consequences when compared to other
European countries.[6] For instance, in a recent systematic review of the evidence on the
health outcomes during the economic crisis in Europe, no studies conducted in Portugal were
included.[5] This is particularly important considering that Portugal had already one of the
highest prevalence rates of mental disorders in Europe, with a 22.9% prevalence of any 12-
month mental disorders before the recession.[19] This scenario may have been further
deteriorated by changes in health care seeking behaviour and health care delivery due to
problems such as impoverishment, increased out-of-pocket payments in public services, and
fear of unemployment as a result of sick leave or time spent in health care.[11] Research on
this subject is increasingly relevant, due to the need to evaluate the specific needs of the
Portuguese context that will support appropriate policy responses aiming at ameliorating the
potential rise of health and social inequalities in the population.
In the context of the Portuguese National Health Service, primary health care
professionals have a crucial role as gatekeepers of the health system. Therefore, it is a key
action to continually promote primary health care as the first line of the health system to
provide care for mental health problems, by ensuring access and quality of care, as well as
guaranteeing adequate cooperation between primary care and specialized mental health
services.[20] Thus, giving voice to users and health professionals is imperative to better
understand the economic crisis consequences and plan initiatives to improve responsiveness
of services, quality of care, and overall systems efficiency and effectiveness.[21] Users and
health professionals are major stakeholders in care delivery; however, so far qualitative
evidence of users and professionals’ experiences as result of economic recession are very
scarce and almost non-existent focusing mental health, with exception of two qualitative
studies conducted in Spain with health professionals.[22,23] To our knowledge, this is the
first qualitative study to explore the effects of the current economic recession on mental
Page 4 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
5
health of the population and on the health system, through the perceived experiences of both
users and primary health care professionals, which may contribute to the design of innovative
policies addressing the health and social impact of the economic recession.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
Aims and objectives
The current study will be conducted under the scope of the Mental Health Crisis
Impact Study – MH Crisis Impact, which benefits from a grant from the Public Health
Initiatives Programme (PT06), financed by EEA Grants Financial Mechanism 2009-2014.
The objective of this study is twofold: 1) to follow-up participants of the World Mental
Health Survey Initiative Portugal carried out in 2008,[19,24] and compare epidemiological
data on mental health disorders, their determinants and use of services, before and after the
economic crisis; 2) to explore users’ and primary care health professionals’ perceptions on
the impact of the economic recession on mental health of the population and on primary care
and mental health care delivery. This study protocol presents the qualitative study designed to
fulfil the second objective, which will complement the quantitative data obtained through the
epidemiological survey, to provide a comprehensive assessment of the impact of the
economic crisis.
Study design and setting
Given the exploratory nature of this research study, different qualitative methods were
considered to determine the best data collection procedure to address the study aims. The
research team decided that the best methods were interaction with users in a group setting
(focus group interviews) and direct interaction with professionals on a one to one basis
through semi-structured interviews. Focus groups were considered the adequate data
collection methods among users due to the need to obtain a diverse array of perspectives and
given the interest in the comparisons made by the participants between their experiences. The
decision to conduct semi-structured interviews was made after consulting with health care
professionals, who referred they might not feel fully comfortable sharing their honest opinion
in the presence of other colleagues.
Page 5 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
6
Primary health care centres were found to be the best setting for data collection. These
are proximity units, where local communities go to address their primary health care needs. A
geographical delimitation based on an evaluation of the municipalities more affected by the
crisis[25] and the socioeconomic typology of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area (LMA)[26] were
considered in order to select primary health care units in areas of higher probability of
economic recession impact. Three case studies were selected: a suburban area located in an
old industrial metropolitan axis (Póvoa Santa Iria UCSP); a suburban area located in a recent
metropolitan expansion axis, which is largely occupied by semi and unskilled services and
industry workers (São Marcos USF); and a consolidated urban area where there is a mix of
middle class neighbourhoods and social housing (Olivais USCP) (Table 1).
Two existing types of primary health care units were considered for the purpose:
Personalized Health Care Centres (UCSPs) and Family Health Units (USFs). It is important
to point out some aspects of the organization of the primary health care service. In 2005 a
comprehensive reform was initiated to increase the accessibility, quality and efficiency of
primary care services, and to improve quality and satisfaction of both users and
professionals.[27] This reform led to the creation of groups of health centres (ACES), to
aggregate and improve management of resources and structures, which are responsible to
ensure the provision of primary care to the population of specific geographic regions.[24]
Family Health Units (USFs) are constituted by small and interdisciplinary public primary
health care teams that provide individual and family health care with organizational,
functional and technical autonomy.[27,28] Personalized Health Care Centres (UCSPs) have a
similar size than USFs, with multiprofessional teams as well, providing personalized access
to care.[27] The two types of units differ by management model. In comparison with UCSPs,
USFs are autonomous in their action plans, make use of professionals’ participation in
management, and have a financial incentive scheme associated with the activity. In relation to
access, the ratio of users to family doctor is higher in the model USF; however if all enrolled
users are considered, and not only those who have a family doctor, there are more users
enrolled per doctor in the UCSP.[29] At the moment, the study was approved in Póvoa Santa
Iria UCSP and São Marcos USF and conditionally approved in Olivais USCP.
Page 6 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
7
Table 1. Primary care units considered for study
Primary health care units
Póvoa Santa Iria UCSP2 São Marcos USF3 Olivais UCSP2
Geographic Coverage
Civil Parish Póvoa de Santa Iria and Forte da Casa
Cacém and São Marcos Olivais
Municipality Vila Franca de Xira Sintra Lisbon
Region LMA LMA LMA
Primary health care centre characteristics
Typology UCSP USF (B) UCSP
ACES1 Estuário do Tejo Sintra Lisboa Central
Population (users) 26.483 13.306 17.657
Nº doctors 7 7 6
Nº nurses 11 6 10
Nº technical/operational assistants
9 5 5
1 ACES: Aggregation of Health Centres (Agrupamento de Centros de Saúde) 2 Data from 2016 3 Data from 2014 LMA - Lisbon Metropolitan Area
Participants
The study will be presented by the research team to the board of each primary health
care centre. A chosen delegate from the board of the primary care centre will be appointed as
the key contact with the research team.
The semi-structured interviews with health professionals and focus group interviews
with users will be conducted together with socio-demographic surveys. The following
characteristics will be considered as inclusion criteria of participants: being at least 18 years
old, having the ability to understand and communicate in Portuguese, and being a user or
professional at that health care centre.
Page 7 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
8
Health professionals
All health professionals (e.g. medical doctors, nurses, social workers, psychologists)
will be contacted personally by the delegate of the collaborating primary health care centre,
for the study to be presented to them and, in case of agreement, to participate in the semi-
structured interviews. The delegate will also be responsible to direct the health professionals
to the research team during data collection.
Users
A convenience sample of users will be recruited by the delegate of the primary health
care centre or their GP, who will reiterate that participation is voluntary. In case of
agreement, the telephone contacts will be provided to the research team to confirm the
attendance of the participants in the day of the focus group. Participants may also be recruited
in the waiting room during the day of the focus group by the delegate or by members of the
research team.
Data collection procedures
The interviews will cover broad themes around the perceived effects of the economic
recession on mental health and well-being of the population, and also on the healthcare
system.
Interviews and focus groups will take place at the health care centres. The topics covered by
the focus groups (Table 2) were based on literature regarding the main risk factors for mental
health problems during the economic crisis and barriers in services access.[2,5,20,30] This
approach will enable the researchers to collect information about the patients’ perceptions of
the impact of the current economic crisis on their personal, occupational and family well-
being, as well as information about the access and utilization of health care services and
proposed suggestions for measures to alleviate the impact of the economic crisis in daily life,
mental health and well-being at the health care centre level and at a national level.
Table 2. Users’ focus groups topic guide
Broad topics Specific topics
Recession related risk factors for mental health problems
Employment, family, economic, social, lifestyle and health areas.
Changes in mental health and well-being
Perceived increase in psychological distress and its impacts on daily life.
Page 8 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
9
Help-seeking behaviours At ease to seek for help for mental health problems; If positive, where and who.
Health provision Satisfaction with health care solutions; perceived changes in health provision during the economic crisis.
Proposed solutions Proposed measures to alleviate the impact of the economic crisis in daily life, mental health and well-being.
The health professionals’ semi-structured interviews will follow a protocol similar to
other relevant research in the area of health systems,[22,23] and will focus on professionals’
views about the potential consequences of the economic crisis on mental health and well-
being of the population, possible key determinants, their experience on its impact on the
health care system and delivery of care, and proposed policy-measures to improve health care
delivery at local and national level during the economic crisis (Table 3). The semi-structured
interview and the focus group questions have been already piloted on a selected group of
respondents to assess the adequacy of research questions.
Table 3. Semi-structured interviews topic guide with health professionals
Broad topics Specific topics
Impact of the economic crisis in population mental health and well-being
Fluctuations in number of patients resorting to primary care; changes in health complaints; mental health problems; prescription of psychotropic medication; users’ social and economic complaints from the users.
Access to and quality of care Perceived changes in access and quality of care at local and national level; introduction of co-payments; short and long term impacts of austerity measures; changes in user's satisfaction.
Proposed Solutions Proposed policy-measures to improve population mental health, well-being, and access to and quality of care during the economic crisis.
The study design was conceived taken into consideration the recommended principles of data
saturation, which indicate that the number of focus groups necessary to reach thematic
saturation may vary from three to five, which, however, does not constitute a standard.[31]
Concerning health professionals, given the differences in professional backgrounds among
the participants, interviews are planned to be carried out until thematic saturation is reached.
Page 9 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
10
Thematic saturation is considered when new concepts and themes no longer emerge from the
data.[32]
Data analysis
All semi-structured interviews and focus groups will be transcribed verbatim,
analysed and codified. Content and thematic analysis will be conducted through an iterative
and reflexive process. Findings will emerge directly from raw data, based on an inductive
approach. A hermeneutic analysis of the transcripts, using constant comparison and category
building procedures, will allow the researchers to identify major themes supported with QSR
NVivo 10 Software.[33] An initial coding of the segments of the transcriptions, quotation by
quotation, will be conducted by two independent researchers following the protocol of
Stemler and collaborators.[34] The segments of coded text will be synthesized into categories
and further grouped into recurrent or most important themes.[35,36] In a first stage, focus
groups and semi-structured interviews will be analysed separately, through a detailed
description and interpretation of the main themes. In a subsequent stage, comparative and
relational analysis from the focus groups and semi-structured interviews will be carried out,
in order to identify how the perspectives of users and health professionals may converge or
diverge in specific subjects. The researchers will discuss on the interpretation of the data and
disagreements with a third researcher until consensus is reached. Findings will be reported
following the COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research)
guidelines.[37]
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
The protocol of the MH Crisis Impact Study, in which this study is integrated, was
approved by the Ethics Committee of the NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of
Lisbon. An information sheet with a description of the study design and objectives will be
presented to all participants. Each participant will be given a written informed consent for the
interview recordings and collected materials. All data will be anonymous and confidential.
Data protection will be ensured by separating audio records, transcripts, consents, and
questionnaires. Code linking data to individuals will be safely stored and only accessible to
Page 10 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
11
the research team. Furthermore, the transcription process and dissemination of the study will
anonymise the participants as a way of protecting their identity. All study materials will be
subject to strict protection and only available to the research team members.
This qualitative approach will contribute to the current knowledge of the effects of the
economic crisis in Portugal on mental-ill health and well-being of the population. It will also
provide a better understanding to the follow-up epidemiological data on mental health
disorders and use of services. The added value of this study lies on its concern with
underlying values, perceptions, attitudes and behaviours related to mental health and
utilization of health care delivery of users and health professionals in the specific context of
an economic recession, in (sub)urban geographical areas particularly affected by its
consequences. Rigorous standards of qualitative research, namely credibility, dependability,
confirmability and transferability, will ensure that the findings obtained are consistent with
the methods of the interpretivist paradigm and its information sources.[36] The limitations of
the present study are related to the research method itself, since the findings cannot be
extrapolated to other contexts. Another potential limitation anticipated by the researchers is
the possibility of over-representation of certain groups, such as retired or unemployed people,
which are more likely to participate in the focus groups. Furthermore, by focusing on primary
health care users and professionals, the scope of this study does not allow to fully assess the
impact of the economic crisis in the health system, in matters such as the perspectives of
mental health professionals towards the provision of specialized mental health services
during the economic crisis.
The combined perspectives of users (subjects and objects to which care is
administered) and health professionals, ensures that all views may contribute to help
redefining policy measures for better coordinated provision of care and efficiency
improvement.[38] The results will be published in international and national peer-reviewed
journals and presented in international conferences. Furthermore, the results will be
disseminated nationally in seminars directed to the general public, students and policy makers
in the health and social sectors and will contribute to the development of policy
recommendations, under the objectives of the MH Crisis Impact Study.
In conclusion, this qualitative study will allow us to shed light on social and economic
processes associated with perceptions of health, well-being and use of services during the
economic crisis. Thus, it will provide an innovative contribution for policy-measures, both
place-based and nationally, to properly address the consequences of the economic recession
in Portugal.
Page 11 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
12
DECLARATIONS
Conflict of interest:
None.
Funding:
The present manuscript was granted by the Public Health Initiatives Programme (PT06),
financed by EEA Grants Financial Mechanism 2009-2014. For further information, please
visit http//www.eeagrants.gov.pt/.
Author’s contributions:
AA and DF conceptualised the design and drafted the paper. JMCA is the principal
investigator in the MH Crisis Impact study and oversaw all activities. JF coordinated the
study design and implementation. GC, NP and MS collaborated in the drafting and reviewing
this manuscript. All authors revised, reviewed and approved the final paper.
Acknowledgments:
Antunes A receives a grant from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology
(FCT), reference PD/BD/105822/2014.
The authors wish to thank Dr. Luís Pisco from ARS-LVT, Dr. Carla Abril from USCP Póva
de Santa Iria, Dr. Jorge Caixinhas from USF São Marcos, Drª Paula Broeiro from USCP
Olivais and Dr. Bruno Heleno from NOVA Medical School. Thanks are extended to all
members of the MH Crisis Impact Study.
Page 12 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
13
References
1 Marmot SM, Bloomer E, Goldblatt P. The Role of Social Determinants in Tackling
Health Objectives in a Context of Economic Crisis. Public Health Rev 2013;35:1–24.
2 Frasquilho D, Matos MG, Salonna F, et al. Mental health outcomes in times of
economic recession : a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health Published
Online First: 2016. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-2720-y
3 Marmot M, Allen J, Bell R, et al. WHO European review of social determinants of
health and the health divide. Lancet 2012;380:1011–29. doi:10.1016/S0140-
6736(12)61228-8
4 World Health Organization. Impact of economic crisis on mental health. Copenhagen:
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe 2011.
5 Parmar D, Stavropoulou C, Ioannidis JPA. Health outcomes during the 2008 financial
crisis in Europe: systematic literature review. BMJ 2016;354:i4588.
doi:10.1136/bmj.i4588
6 Legido-Quigley H, Karanikolos M, Hernandez-Plaza S, et al. Effects of the financial
crisis and Troika austerity measures on health and health care access in Portugal.
Health Policy 2016;120:833–9. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.04.009
7 Angerer J. Stability and Growth Pact – An Overview of the Rules. European
Parliament 2015.
www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2014/528745/IPOL-
ECON_NT(2014)528745_EN.pdf (accessed Feb 2017).
8 OECD. National Accounts at a Glance 2015. OECD Publishing 2015.
9 Eurostat. Total unemployment - LFS series. Unemployment rates by sex, age and
nationality. 2017. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lfs/data/database (accessed Feb
2017).
10 European Comission. The economic adjustment programme for Portugal 2011-2014.
European Union 2014. doi:10.2765/85246
Page 13 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
14
11 World Health Organization. The impact of the financial crisis on the health system and
health in Portugal.Geneva: World Health Organization 2014.
12 Fiori F, Rinesi F, Spizzichino D, et al. Employment insecurity and mental health
during the economic recession: An analysis of the young adult labour force in Italy.
Soc Sci Med 2016;153:90–8. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.010
13 Economou M, Angelopoulos E, Peppou LE, et al. Enduring financial crisis in Greece:
prevalence and correlates of major depression and suicidality. Soc Psychiatry
Psychiatr Epidemiol 2016;51:1015–24. doi:10.1007/s00127-016-1238-z
14 Drydakis N. The effect of unemployment on self-reported health and mental health in
Greece from 2008 to 2013: A longitudinal study before and during the financial crisis.
Soc Sci Med 2015;128:43–51. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.025
15 Gili M, Roca M, Basu S, et al. The mental health risks of economic crisis in Spain:
evidence from primary care centres, 2006 and 2010. Eur J Public Health 2013;23:103–
8. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cks035
16 Urbanos-Garrido RM, Lopez-Valcarcel BG. The influence of the economic crisis on
the association between unemployment and health: an empirical analysis for Spain.
Eur J Heal Econ 2015;16:175–84. doi:10.1007/s10198-014-0563-y
17 World Health Organization. Economic crisis, health systems and health in Europe:
impact and policy implications. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional
Office for Europe 2015.
18 Christodoulou NG, Christodoulou GN. Financial crises: Impact on mental health and
suggested responses. Psychother Psychosom 2013;82:279–84. doi:10.1159/000351268
19 Caldas-de-Almeida J, Xavier M, Cardoso G, et al. Estudo Epidemiológico Nacional de
Saúde Mental - 1.o Relatório [National Mental Health Epidemiological Study - 1st
Report]. Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas 2013.
20 Martin-Carrasco M, Evans-Lacko S, Dom G, et al. EPA guidance on mental health and
economic crises in Europe. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2016;266:89–124.
doi:10.1007/s00406-016-0681-x
21 Thornicroft G, Tansella M. Growing recognition of the importance of service user
involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc
2005; 14:1–3.
22 Heras-Mosteiro J, Sanz-Barbero B, Otero-Garcia L. Health Care Austerity Measures in
Times of Crisis : The Perspectives of Primary Health Care Physicians in Madrid.
Spain. Int. J. Health Serv 2016;46(2):283-99. doi:10.1177/0020731415625251
Page 14 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
15
23 Cervero-Liceras F, McKee M, Legido-Quigley H. The effects of the financial crisis
and austerity measures on the Spanish health care system: A qualitative analysis of
health professionals’ perceptions in the region of Valencia. Health Policy
2015;119:100–6. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.11.003
24 Xavier M, Baptista H, Mendes JM, et al. Implementing the World Mental Health
Survey Initiative in Portugal - rationale, design and fieldwork procedures. Int J Ment
Health Syst 2013;7:19. doi:10.1186/1752-4458-7-19
25 Ferrão J. Território [Territory]. In: Portugal Social de A a Z: Temas em aberto.
Impresa Publishing 2013: 245–60.
26 Statistics Portugal. Tipologia socioeconómica das Áreas Metropolitanas de Lisboa e
Porto – 2011 [Socioeconomic typology of the Metropolitan Areas of Lisbon and
Oporto - 2011]. 2014.
www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_publicacoes&PUBLICACOESpub_
boui=219306706&PUBLICACOESmodo=2 (accessed Feb 2017).
27 Pisco L. Reforma da Atenção Primária em Portugal em duplo movimento : unidades
assistenciais autónomas de saúde familiar e gestão em agrupamentos de Centros de
Saúde Saúde [Primary Healthcare Reform in Portugal on two fronts : autonomous
family healthcare units and management of groupings of Health Centers]. Cien Saude
Colet 2011;16:2841–52.
28 Ministry of Health of Portugal. Diário da República: Despacho Normativo n.o 9/2006.
[Regulatory Order no. 9/2006] 2006.
29 Portuguese Healthcare Regulation Authority. Estudo sobre as Unidades de Saúde
Familiar e as Unidades de Cuidados de Saúde Personalizados [Study on family care
units and personalized care units]. 2016;119.
30 Andrade LH, Alonso J, Mneimneh Z, et al. Barriers to Mental Health Treatment:
Results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys. Psychol Med
2014;44:1303–17. doi:10.1017/S0033291713001943.
31 Morgan DL. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Sage Research Methods 2013;32–
46. doi:10.4135/9781412984287
32 Flick U. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. Sage 2011.
doi:10.4135/9781446282243.n33
33 Castleberry A. NVivo 10 [software program]. Version 10. QSR International 2012. Am
J Pharm Educ 2014;78:1–2. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2012.10.004
34 Stemler S, Colors P. An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research
Page 15 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from
For peer review only
16
& Evaluation. 2001;7:1–6.
35 Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative
evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. Health serv res
2005;10:6–20. doi: 10.1258/1355819054308576.
36 Ulin PR, Robinson ET, Tolley EE. Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field
Guide for Applied Research 1st ed. Jossey-Bass 2005.
37 Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criterio for reporting qualitative research
(COREQ): a 32- item checklist for interviews and focus group. Int J Qual Heal Care
2007;19:349–57. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
38 Lawn S. Integrating service user participation in mental health care: What will it take?
Int J Integr Care 2015;15:2–6. doi: 10.5334/ijic.1992.
Page 16 of 16
For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml
BMJ Open
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
on Septem
ber 16, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.
http://bmjopen.bm
j.com/
BM
J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm
jopen-2017-017032 on 3 Septem
ber 2017. Dow
nloaded from