Welcome back again!

19
Welcome back again! Sept 29, 2014

description

Welcome back again!. Sept 29, 2014. Today’s Plan. Class summaries Homework (achievement chart) Go over your feed back My notions of teaching and learning ( enactivism ) Interpretation of last class from my perspective of learning and teaching Teaching strategies/lesson planning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Welcome back again!

Page 1: Welcome back again!

Welcome back again!Sept 29, 2014

Page 2: Welcome back again!

Today’s Plan

Class summaries Homework (achievement chart) Go over your feed back My notions of teaching and learning

(enactivism) Interpretation of last class from my

perspective of learning and teaching Teaching strategies/lesson planning Division of fractions

Page 3: Welcome back again!

Feed back (what you want)

Lesson planning More structure-uncomfortable (lecturing?/sit-tell-do?)

› Less discussion-more opportunities to learn More videos (especially of model teaching) More range of grade topics (9-12) Teaching strategies for struggling students More teaching strategies Resources of activities for the the I/S level New techniques: smart board, applets, etc. Student choice (students ask questions about things that relate

to their practicum experiences)-Let’s plan for teaching together? Course summary (video online) My quietness (please let me know when you can’t hear) Moderated marking (7/8 want it, mandatory?)

Page 4: Welcome back again!

Notions of teaching and learning (enactivism)

Enactivism is a theory of cognition› Flavor of constructivism but has different focuses› What is constructivism?

Teaching and student learning co-emerge/couple› Build on students prior knowledge and experiences

(NCTM principle) My students play an important role in the direction

of each class › I’ve taught the same class several times but it’s never

the same because of the responses/interests/backgrounds of students Basically, I never know exactly how students will respond

or react. I need to listen and react.

Page 5: Welcome back again!

Framed by Enactivism

a theory of cognition or philosophy that has become popular amongst Canadian mathematics education researchers (Ernest 2007).

Enactivism finds it roots/origins in biology and has co-emergence as a central idea (Li, Clark & Winchester, 2010).

A living system (learner/class of students, etc.) and its environment co-emerge and couple as they interact. › “[A]ll of our understandings are situated in and co-emerge with

complex webs of experience, and so we can never discern the direct causes of any particular action” (Sumara and Davis p 412).

Teaching, in this framework, can not be predetermined as it emerges through the interactions of the teacher and learners. A teacher cannot predetermine how a lesson will run as one cannot completely predict how a learner/(or learners) will react to their environment/a piece of mathematics. Cognition occurs in the possibility of shared actions.

Page 7: Welcome back again!

What does lesson planning look like from an enactivists perspective?

The big question is: › What is the difference between lesson

planning and planning for teaching?

Page 8: Welcome back again!

Let’s look at a document from the Ontario Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat (pg. 7 http://www.curriculum.org/secretariat/coplanning/files/CoPlanningGuide.pdf )

Page 9: Welcome back again!

Where do we select problems from?

NCTM, nrich, edugains, talk to each other, go to conferences, talk to me, talk with other teachers of mathematics.

Let’s look at NCTM

Page 10: Welcome back again!

During the lesson

Ask in the moment questions that promote student’s understanding. (including asking students to compare their thinking).› Examples from this class

Observe very tentatively to decide what to draw students attention to during whole group discussion.› Examples from this class

Select students work to sequence, highlight and summarize

Page 11: Welcome back again!

The big thing…During the lesson

You need to take up students thinking to build on their prior knowledge!› What does this mean?Taking up student thinking involves an ongoing, cyclical, continuous process where students share what they think, teachers listen to student thinking, teachers make in the moment decisions about how to support and direct students’ attention

Page 12: Welcome back again!

What does enactivism mean for my math classes? (teaching on the fly)

I don’t go to class with nothing! I have a list of possible problems based

on the curriculum and my interests. I’ve done the math and anticipated student responses.› Rarely do we cover all of them or in the order

you find them in my notes› I often do make up questions to assist in

understanding (we’ll talk about this throughout the course with specific instances from my classroom)

Page 13: Welcome back again!

What does this mean for your lesson plans?

How many practicing teachers have lesson plans?

You will be expected to use one…Here’s a bunch of different templates that you can use:

http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/supo/Forms_Resources/Lesson_Plan_Templates/index.html

Page 14: Welcome back again!

Complex instruction

http://nrich.maths.org/7013

Page 15: Welcome back again!

My adaptation of complex instruction

Students are given specific roles based on the strengths› Facilitator, Recorder/Reporter, Resource Manager,

Understanding coordinator Assessment (Daily assignments to be handed in at

the end of class many questions come from the list I come to class with)› Careful be conscious of time etc.

Group Assessment (actually individual assessment) Students are taking a crucial role in each lesson

and each assessment task

Page 16: Welcome back again!

Division of fractions

Craft a word problem that involves the division of fractions (the denominator of the divisor fraction can not equal 1)

Page 17: Welcome back again!

Ribbon question

You have six meters of ribbon. Each bow requires 5/6 of a meter. How many bows can you make? How much is left over?

Anticipate student responses

Page 18: Welcome back again!

Thanks for engaging!

Page 19: Welcome back again!

References

Li, Q., Clark, B., & Winchester, I. (2010). Instructional design and technology grounded in enactivism: A paradigm shift? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, (3): 403–19.

Sumara, D & DAVIS, B. (1997). Enactivist Theory and Community Learning: toward a complexified understanding of action research, Educational Action Research, Volume 5, No. 3, 403-427.