Vulnerability of coastal fishery communities to climate ...
Transcript of Vulnerability of coastal fishery communities to climate ...
Vulnerability of coastal fishery
communities to climate change in Kerala
state
5-11-2013, Annemarie Groot, Tanya Singh and Kirstin van Riel,
Outline
�Vulnerability to climate change
�Case study: Vulnerability of coastal fishery communities to climate change in Kerala state
�Exercise (tools)
Vulnerability to climate change?
� Vulnerability is the degree to which a system is susceptible to, or unable to cope with adverse effects of climate change (including climate variability and extremes) (IPCC, 2007)
� Primary determinants: exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity
Vulnerability to climate change: main
determinants (IPCC, 2007)
� Exposure: exposure of a system
to stimuli that act on a particular
system (temperature increases,
changes in frequency or intensity
of precipitation..)
� Sensitivity: responsiveness of a
system to climate hazards
� Adaptive capacity: refers to the
ability of a system to adjust to CC.
Ability is measured in terms of
resources availability (human,
technical, biophysical and financial
capital) and institutional capacity
Vulnerability indices and indicators (examples)
access to
technology
access to
information
demographics
diversification
in income
generation
temperature
precipitationVulnerability
sensitivityexposure
adaptive
capacityChange
intensity
of
precipitati
on
Age
early warning
system
no. of
income
generating
activities
Infrastructure
Location
of houses
Change in
onset of
the
monsoon
Awareness
raising
Contextual nature of vulnerability
and difficulties of validating
indicators provide challenges to
development of vulnerability
indicators
Approaches: top down - bottom up
� Top down
� Bottom up
(Kerala case study)
Case study: Vulnerability of fisheries and fishery
dependent communities to climate change
� Start to build understanding about vulnerability
� Context: Indo Mareclim
� Research question
What determines the vulnerability of the fisheries sector, in
particular the fishing communities under consideration to
changes in the biophysical system? And how do different actors
within the fisheries sector perceive and respond to the affects
that shape their vulnerability?
Climate change is an add-on stressor
Source: CMFRIClimate Change
Impact on Fishing communities
Overexploitation
Fishery communities are affected by multiple anthropogenic factors (climate change is just one of these
Applied methodology
� Bottom up approach - participatory vulnerability assessment
� Focus on current vulnerability (future vulnerability touched upon)
� Desk study research combined with interviews with stakeholders....
� Study area ....
Stakeholders / interviewees
• Community (n=39):
• Traditional fishermen (canoes and catamarans)
• Traditional motorised
• Trawlers
• Fish vendors
• ‘Middle man’
• Fishermen wives
• State level (n=15):
• Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI)
• State Fisheries Department
• NGO’s
• Students of the Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean studies (KUFOS) university
Study area: Kerala state - Ernakulam district (Vypin
Island) and Alappey district
General information on fisheries and fishery communities
� Fisheries industry in Kerala has a dominant role in its economic
development. Share of Kerala is 8.2% in India’s total fish production
� Marine fishery sector in Kerala has increased over the years (no.
people)
� Marine fishes dominate total landing include Indian Oils sardines,
India Mackerel, threadfin breams, ribbon fishes, tuna (pelagic fishes)
and perch, sharks, prawns
� Traditional (marine and inland) and mechanized (incl. trawling
boats)(marine). Traditional fishermen mainly involved in pelagic
fisheries, trawlers involved in highly valued export fish (e.g. marine
shrimps)
� Fishermen are active in the traditional (marine and inland) or
mechanized fishery sector, fisher women are mainly involved in post
harvesting activities (processing, peeling)
General information on fisheries and fishery communities
(continuation): coastal zone management, fishery regulation
� Coastal Regulation Zone Notification (CRZ)
� Integrated coastal zone management programme still to be
developed
� Kerala fisheries development and management policy (1993)
� Trawl-ban (mechanized boats), 47 days mid June - end of July,
marine fisheries)
� Welfare and self help programmes to enhance social and
economic security
� No state level Climate Change action plan yet
Outcomes: based on interviews – literature
Exposure to climate change
� Change in monsoon pattern (SW): decrease in frequency and intensity (years before 2013). In 2013, intense rain and air currents
� Decrease in occurrence of coastal upwelling
� Increased sea surface temperature (SST) (0.2˚- 0.3˚C in past 45 years)
� Increased sea level rise
� Increased salinity
� Increase in heavy storms, coastal flooding and such coastal erosion
ST2
Slide 15
ST2 sometimes kirstin mentions droughts, but emphasis is more on floodsSingh, Tanya, 03-11-2013
Sensitivity to climate change
� High dependency on fisheries sector
� Lack of job alternatives (women are an exception)
� Housing location (very close to the water, thus prone to floods and storms)
High sensitivity
Impact of CC on fish resources and fishing
community
Exposure Impact
Decrease in frequency and intensity of monsoon rainfall1) Before 2013
2) 2013
• Fishermen/women: negative effect on spawning • Officials: change in monsoon can have positive and negative effect on spawning season - production capacity
• Less opportunities to go out fishing –decrease in catch• Decrease in income
Increase in sea surface temperature
• Increase in fast growing, smaller, short lived and low value fish
• Extended distribution of pelagic fish (India mackerel still abundant but migrating to North, oil sardine abundant)
• Sharks and catfish are declining (both fishermen/ officials)(not clearly linked to SST)
• Shift in spawning season (towards cooler periods)
Decrease in occurrence of coastal upwelling (no upwelling in 2013)
• Less pelagic fish in inshore waters
Coastal erosion Houses , roads .. destroyed
Inland fisheries • Eutrophication and mass fish kills• Emerging fish diseases
Trends in fisheries resources based on interviews and
literature findings
Marine fish species Trends based on stakeholders
perception
Source of information Literature findings
Oil Sardine –
Sardinella longiceps
Increased
Increased (since 2000)
Trawler
CMFRI, State Fisheries Department
Increased (i.e. CMFRI, 2013)
Vivekanandan, 2011; Mohamed et
al., 2013)
Indian Mackerel –
Rastrilliger kanagurta
Increased
Decreased since 2000
wives of fishermen
CMFRI, State Fisheries Department
Declining (Mohamed et al., 2013).
Silver moony –
Monodactylus Argenteus
Decreased in quantity and
quality (size)
Gill netters Abundant but showing a negative
growth (Sathianandan et al., 2011)
Tiger prawns - Penaeus monodon Decreased in quality (size) Fisherwoman Decreasing since 1997 (Nair,2011)
Marine shrimp (penaeid prawns) Decreased Mechanized/ Trawler Increase (i.e. CMFRI, 2013)
Threadfin bream (pink perch) Decreased Mechanized/ State Fisheries Dept. Decreased (Sathianandan et al.,
2011)
Tuna Decreased Mechanized X
Cat fishes - Tachysurus sp. Depleted since 1973
Declining
Mechanzed, State Fisheries Dept.
Trawler; FGD
Disappeared since 1997 (Nair,
2011)
Collapsed (Mohamed et al., 2013)
Sharks / Rays / Skates -
Elasmobranchs
‘Vanished’
Declining
No change
Trawler, traditional fishing couple;
motorised
FGD; CMFRI
Trawler / net mender
Declining (Mohamed et al., 2013)
Less abundant (Sathianandan et
al., 2011)
Inland fish species
Pearl spot - Etroplus suratensis Decreased Traditional, small scale fisherman x
Adaptive capacity
� Poor access to financial resources (high interest rates)
� Poor access to education
� Access to networks: Women seems to have better access to networks than men
� Access to information: Tsunami warning system is perceived as being effective
� Roads, bridges are constructed to facilitate evacuation
� Governance, leadership: Coastal Regulation Zone notification is perceived as being partially effective, trawl ban is considered to be effective
Vulnerability
� Traditional fishermen (highest: lack access to facilities, live close to the water, difficult to get loans, no alternative, at high risks during storms)
� Mechanized fishermen/trawlers (lower; capacity to extent fishing range towards deeper water)
� Chinese-net fishermen (lower: highly vulnerable during SW monsoon)
�Women of fishermen (lower: take on alternative employment, SHG)
� Youth (lower: might have a better future, due to education and migration)
� Fish vendors (low: more financial capital, affected by price fluctuation)
Recommendations to better dealing with CC impacts
and sustain fisheries resources (coping/adaptation)
� Trawl-ban might need to be adjusted as spawning seasons and distribution
ranges of fishes are said to be changing
� Support development of alternative income generating activities e.g. in
tourism (mal adaptation!)
� Support adaptive fishing and post-harvest practices to sustain fish production
and quality
� Increase awareness about CC among fishing communities and other
stakeholders
� Develop decision support systems for fisheries (prices, ..
� Stop overfishing and adopt Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries and
Integrated Ecosystem-based Fisheries Management
Future outlook
� Total amount of rainfall is likely to decrease
� The occurrence of upwelling is likely to become even less frequent (SW wind flow is likely to weaken)
Decrease in amount of (pelagic) fish in the inshore waters
� Traditional fisheries might become a dying tradition
� But, effects of the monsoon/CC on fish production, fishery community remain unclear. Need for research!
Exercise: introduction of tools
Climatic hazard trend analysis
Objective
� To gain insight into past climatic hazards and identify trends in their nature, intensity and impacts
� To develop insight into the impact of the climatic hazards
� To understand past and present coping strategies, incl. their effectiveness
� To identify a first set of adaptation options
Procedure
1.Start with the earliest hazard event anyone can remember, a timeline of the last 20-30 years is developed to identify and discuss large climatic hazard events.
2.Discuss the impacts of the events, community reaction and coping strategies and institutional support.
3.Assess and discuss the effectiveness of the coping/ adaptation strategies (past, present and future)
4.Identify new adaptation strategies that are more effective
Climatic hazard trend analysis (example)
Tool ‘Livelihood Resource Vulnerability Assessment’
(Regmi et al, 2010)
Objective of the tool
� To assess the intensity of impact of climatic hazards on livelihood resources
Process and procedure
� Identify a number of climate induced hazards and relevant resources. Resources can be technical capital (e.g. roads), social/human capital (e.g. networks) or financial. Write the climate induced hazards and relevant resources in a table.
� Participants rate the impact severity of the climatic hazards on the different resources.
� Scores are decided by consensus, use rating system as described in the tool description
Expected outputs
� Insight into those livelihood assets that are heavily affected by climate-induced hazards
Table: Livelihood Resource Vulnerability Assessment
Climate induced hazards
Resources
Increased uncertainty in rain fall
Increased risk of soil erosion
etc.
Fish (marine)3 (High impact on the resource)
Etc.
Fish (back waters)
Etc.
Marketing network
Roads
Etc.
Tool Vulnerability Assessment (Regmi et al, 2010)
� Use of the tool
� To differentiate vulnerability to climatic hazards across different sectors and social groups
� To identify most vulnerable social groups within a community and most vulnerable sectors
Process and procedure
� Preferably, make use of a focus group discussion.
� Climate induced hazards are listed along one side of a grid, as shown hereafter.
� Because of time constraints focus only on social groups (if you have time you could assess different sectors as well). List different social groups (age, gender, types of fishermen/women..) as shown in the table hereafter.
� Participants discuss the vulnerability of each social group to each climatic hazard and consensually agree a rating as below.
�
� Expected output:
� Insights into the most vulnerable people and groups within a community (and/or the most vulnerable sectors), including the reasons why
Table: Vulnerability Assessment
social groups within the community
climate change induced hazardsincreased uncertainty in rain fall
increasedillness inthe family
increasedrisk oferosion
etc.
age differentiation
youth
adults (2)
elderly (3)
gender differentiation
men
women
etc.
Types of fisherman/women
Traditional
Mechanized
etc.
Sectors
Fisheries
Agriculture
Etc.
End slide or
section heading
Tekst