VPM’S TMC LAW COLLEGE, THANEVPM's TMC Law College d 65 d V idhijna 2012 - 2013 VPM’S TMC LAW...

VPM's TMC Law CollegeVPM's TMC Law CollegeVPM's TMC Law CollegeVPM's TMC Law CollegeVPM's TMC Law College65 ��d

d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

VPM’S TMC LAW COLLEGE, THANE

To facilitate professional legal education and thereby empower and sensitize citizens

MISSION

The views of the authors are theirs; the Editorial Committee & the institution

disclaim any responsibility regarding them.

Cover Page Design : Mrs. Sri Vidhya Jayakumar

Vidhijna : Object

Disclaimer

Chief Editor : Incharge Principal Mrs. Sri Vidhya Jayakumar

Staff Members : Prof. Mr. Vinod Wagh & Prof. Mr. Mithun Bansode Prof. S. M. Payak

Ms. Sheetal Authade (Librarian)

Mrs. Ranjan Karandikar

Mr. Mukesh Rane

Mr. Pannalal Tribuvan

Student Member : Ms. Krushna Kamat

Editorial Committee - 2012 - 13

To provide qualitative legal education particularly to the residents of Thane and its vicinity

To provide training in the skills essential for practitioners of law

To inculcate discipline, values and a sense of social responsibility

OUR GOALS & OBJECTIVES

To be in the class of excellent centres of legal education in the country

VISION

VPM's TMC Law CollegeVPM's TMC Law CollegeVPM's TMC Law CollegeVPM's TMC Law CollegeVPM's TMC Law College d66 ��

d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

Contents1 Enrolment of Students 1

2 Annual Report 2011-12 6

3 College Toppers & Academic Prizes 15

Pho.. to.. graphs...

4 Recent Controversy about the PoliceHandling of Cyber Law Offences Mr. Jayesh Gopal Gokhale 36

5 Electoral Reforms: Issues and Challengesin the domain of Criminalization Mr. Mithun Bansode 39

6 Bhaya, Nirbhaya and Law Mrs. Srividhya Jayakumar 44

7 Rising number of criminals in Parliamentand State Legislature is disastrous fordemocracy Ms. Ranjani Krishnan 48

8 Rising number of criminals in Parliamentand Legislative Assembly is not disastrousfor democracy Ms. Krushna Kamat 50

9 Harnessing the dragon called “Moot Court” Mr. Jayesh Gopal Gokhale 52

10 The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Should beAmended to Specifically Exclude Suppression/Misrepresentation of Caste as A Ground forNullity of Marriage Ms. Ranjani Krishnan 54

11 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Should Not beAmended to Specifically Exclude Suppression/Misrepresentation of Caste as A Ground forNullity of Marriage Ms. Krushna Kamat 56

12 Aíbrb {MÌnQ>mMr nmoñQ>g© gmd©O{ZH$ dhmZm§daVrAm{U añË`mdaVr bmdÊ`m~Ôb {ZfoY gm¡. ñdmVr ~mb Q>|~o 58

13 H${dVm {dZmoX AOw©Z hQ>H$a 60

g§Vmof {Jar 60

d¡embr nmQ>rb 60

g§Xrn Jw§Omb 61

_mohZ qZ~miH$a 61

g§Ho$V bobo 61

14 àW_ df© {dYr {dÚmÏ`mªMr "R>mUo {OëhmH$mamJ¥hmg e¡j{UH$ oQ>' - Ahdmb lr. A{Zb gy ©d§er 62


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

Enrolment of StudentsStudents Strength 2012 - 2013

Class Strength SC ST VJNT SBC OBC OPEN

M F M F M F M F M F M F M F

I LL.B. 167 132 45 32 6 3 14 4 3 4 22 15 77 74

II LL.B. 142 143 29 18 3 3 6 7 1 - 33 15 70 100

III LL.B. 115 131 13 11 3 2 10 8 2 2 21 23 66 85

Student Intake

I YEAR II YEAR III YEAR

299 / 300 285 / 300 246 / 300

ñd. _m. Zm. nmQ>rbOÝ_ … 19 Owb¡ 1926 {ZYZ … 26 _mM© 2013

Amåhr `m§À`m H$m ©H$V¥©Ëdmg AmXam§Obr dmhVmo.EH$ àoaUmXm`r ì`pŠV_Ëd åhUyZ Amåhmg Vw_Mr

gX¡d AmR>dU amhrb.Amnbo H$m ©H$V¥©Ëd Am{U ì`ŠVr_Ëd Amåhmbm àoaUmXm`r d ñ\y$VuXm`r R>amo.

{hM AmnUmbm ^mdnyU© lÕm§Obr ...àmMm`m©, {ejH$ {ejHo$Va

H$_©Mmar Am{U {dÚmWu{d. à. _. Mo {dYr _hm{dÚmb`, R>mUo

F F


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

Staff and various bodiesLocal Managing Committee

Dr. V. V. Bedekar Shri M. V. Gokhale

Shri U. B. Joshi Shri S.V. Karandikar

Mrs. A. A. Bapat Shri. Ravindra Rasal

Mrs. Srividhya Jayakumar Shri. S. G. Paranjpe

Ms. Hetal Meishri Shri. S. V. Joshi

Mr. Vinod Wagh

Teaching StaffMrs. J. Srividhya – I/c Principal

Shri. Vinod Wagh Shri. Mithun Bansode

Mr. S. M. Payak Mrs. J. A. Navare

Shri. F. N. Kazi Shri. S. G. Paranjpe

Shri. A. M. Jalisatgi Mrs. A. A. Datar

Ms. Hetal Meishri Shri. Manoj Bhatt

Shri. Ganesh Badri Ms. Manisha M. Wagh

Mrs. Preeti Kurup Mrs. Rashmi Acharya

Mr. Amber Joshi Mrs. Sangita Mehta

Ms. Vidya Gaikwad Mrs. Ranjan Joshi

Mrs. Dikshita Gupte Dr. Mrs. Swati Gadgil

Mrs. Swati Sinha Mrs. Sunitha K. K.

Ms. Khushboo Bhatt Mrs. Dhanashree Kelkar

Mr. Lata Sakpal Mr. Sanjay Shinde

Mr. Sanjay Vaidya Mrs. Supriya Yadav

Dr. Barve Mahesh

Guest Faculty

Shri Ram Apte Sr. Counsel, Mumbai High Court

Mrs. Josthna Navre Advocate, Thane

Mr. Vijay Agashe Advocate, Thane

Mr. Arun Navre Advocate, Thane

Mr. Sanjay Borkar Advocate, Thane

Mrs. Madhavi Naik Advocate, Thane


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

Mr. Ganesh Sovani Advocate, Thane

Mrs. Sunitha Kaprekar Advocate, Thane

Mr. Gajanan Chavan Advocate, Thane

Mrs. Glady Pereira-Mahimkar Advocate, Thane

Mr. Bharat Khanna Advocate, Thane

Mr. V. P. Patil Advocate, Mumbai High Court

Mr. Ashutosh Gole Advocate, Mumbai High Court

Mr. Sandesh Patil Advocate, Mumbai

Administrative staff

Shri. S. V. Joshi OS

Mrs. M. S. Ghatnekar Head Clerk

Mrs. R. A. Karandikar Sr. Clerk

Shri. Mukesh R. Rane Jr. Clerk

Mrs. V. B. Shinde Clerk

Mr. P. S. Jadhav Clerk

Shri. P. S. Tribhuvan Peon

Shri. W. D. Karande Peon

Shri. R. R. Pathare Peon

Shri. Raju Rathod House Keeping Staff

Mrs. Asha Pathare House Keeping Staff

Students' Council

Mrs. Srividhya Jayakumar Chairperson / I/C Principal

Mr. Vinod H. Wagh Lecturer Nominee

Mr. Prathamesh S. Mhatre General Secretary

Mr. Sumit M. Kelkar Cultural Representative

Mr. Sagar S. Patil Sports Representative

Ms. Alka G. Mane Lady Representative III LL.B.

Ms. Sonal Kapre Lady Representative I LL.B.

Mr. Swapnil P. Bhosale Class Representative III year

Mr. Ranade Hinanshu Class Representative II year

Mr. Kadam Kumar Venkatesh Class Representative I year

Mr. Hitesh Y. Sawant Class Representative I year


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

Library Staff

Ms. Sheetal Authade Librarian

Shri. A. D. Dandane (Retired) Library Attendant

Ms. Sampada Ramesh Sathe Library Attendant

Shri. M. D. Mande (Retired) Library Attendant

Shri. Harshal Koli (Left) Library Attendant

Mr. Waman Karande Joined in April 2013

Mr. Santosh Zugare Joined in April 2013

Retired in the year 2012-13

Our Best Wishes for Happy & Healthy Retired Life!Our Best Wishes for Happy & Healthy Retired Life!Our Best Wishes for Happy & Healthy Retired Life!Our Best Wishes for Happy & Healthy Retired Life!Our Best Wishes for Happy & Healthy Retired Life!

New AppointmentFrom April 2013

Mr. M.D. MandeLib. Attendant

Mr. A. D. DandaneLib. Attendant

Mr. Santosh ZugareLib. Attendant

Mr. Waman KarandeLib. Attendant

Congratulations & Best Wishes!Congratulations & Best Wishes!Congratulations & Best Wishes!Congratulations & Best Wishes!Congratulations & Best Wishes!


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

Women Development Cell

(Under VC’s Directions under Section 14(8) of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994)

Mrs. Srividhya Jayakumar In-charge Principal – (Ex-officio) President

Mrs. Janhavi Navare Nominee from teaching staff

Ms. Hetal Meisheri Nominee from teaching staff

Mrs. Ranjan Karandikar Nominee from non-teaching staff

Adv. Mrs. Madhavi Naik Woman Representative from NGO(NGO: Arth Foundation)

Mr. Vinod Wagh Member from Reserved Category

Ms. Alka Mane (III LL.B. ) – Women’s Representative fromStudents’ Council

Marathi Mandal

I/C Principal Mrs. Srividhya Jayakumar Chairperson (Ex-officio)

Prof. Mr. Ambar Joshi Member

Prof. Mr. Mithun Bansode Member

Prof. Mrs. Navre Member

Mr. Sanket Lele (II LL.B.) Member

Backward Classes Committee

(Constituted in April 2012)

I/C Principal Mrs. Srividhya Jayakumar Chairperson

Prof. Mr. Vinod Wagh Member

Prof. Mr. Mithun Bansode Member

Mr. Mukesh Rane Secretary

Mr. Pannalal Tribuvan Secretarial assistant

Practical Training Committee

I/C Principal Mrs. Srividhya Jayakumar (Chairperson)

Prof. Mr. Vinod Wagh (Member) Prof. Mr. Mithun Bansode (Member)

Prof. Mr. S. M. Payak (Member) Mrs. Ranjan Karandikar (Secretary)


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

Annual Report (2012-13)Arrangement of Terms

First Term 2nd July 2012 to 15th Dec. 2012

Second Term 2rd Jan. 2013 to 18th May 2013

Commencement of Classes

I LLB A & B - 9th July 2012

I LLB C, D, EII & III LLB

1st August 2012

Academic Performance

Result Analysis of April 2012 University Exam

Class Uni. Result % College Result % No. of 1st Classes

I LL.B. 34.1 % 29.47 % 2

II LL. B. 41.30 % 41.25 % 1

III LL.B. 63.18 % 75.86 % 2

November 2012

Class Uni. Result % College Result %

I LL.B. I Sem. Not Received 31.59 %

II LL. B. III Sem. 45.24 % 56.03 %

III LL.B. V Sem. 52.33 % 60.71 %

}

Am°JñQ> 2012_yQ> H$moQ© gmXarH$aU

_hm{dÚmb`m_Ü o {X. 29 Am°JñQ> amoOr {dÚmÏ`m©gmR>r _wQ> H$moQ>© hm°b _Ü o _wQ> H$moQ>© Mo gmXarH$aU H$aÊ`mV Ambo.V¥Vr` {dYr dfm©À`m {dÚmÏ`m©Zr gXa gmXarH$aU Ho$bo. gXa H$m ©H«$_mgmR>r àmo. namO§no d A°S> {dÚm Jm`H$dmS> `m§ZrÝ`m`mYre åhUyZ H$m_ nm{hbo. Imbrb {dÚmÏ`mªZr `mV gh^mJ Zm|Xdbm.

1) Hw$. ê$nmbr AH$mobH$a 2) O oe JmoIbo3) âV nmadmZr 4) Hw$. hf©Xm H$migH$a

Ho$g Z§. 1. - J«mhH$ ga§jU H$m`Xm 1986 AV§J©V gXa Ho$g {X„r amÁ` J«mhH$ _§S>i `m§À`mH$S>o gmXa H$amd`mMrhmoVr. gXa Ho$g _Ü o Airport A{YH$mè`mÀ`m Xwb©jVo_wio Pmboë`m _wË yMr ZwH$gmZ ânmB© _mJUr hr homVr.

Ho$g Z§. 2 - EH$ 3 dfm©Mr _wbJr {Q>. ìhr _m{bHo$À`m eyqQ>J Xaå`mZ OI_r Pmë`m_wio _w§~B© Cƒ Ý`m`mb` (OS)

`mÀ`m H$ama H$m`Xm d ZwH$gmZrMm H$m`Xm Imbr ânmB© _mJUo Agm hmoVm.


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

gXa gmXarH$aU ~KÊ`mgmR>r nyU© g^mJ¥h {dÚmÏ`m©Zr ^abo hmoVo. `mdoir à^mar àmMm`m© lr_Vr lr{dÚm O`Hw$_ma`m§Zr Am^ma _mZbo.

àJVr _hm{dÚmb` S>m|{~dbr `m§Zr {XZm§H$ 22 Am°JñQ> 2012, ~wYdma amoOr API JaO à{H«$`m Am{U A_§b~OmdUr `m{df`mda EH$m H$m ©emioMo Am`moOZ Ho$bo hmoVo. gXa H$m ©emio_Ü o 6 ì`m doVZ Am`moJmZwgma nXmoÞVr Mo {ZH$f `mda MMm©H$aÊ`mV Ambr. à^mar àmMm`m© lr_Vr lr{dÚm O`Hw$_ma Am{U àm. {_WwZ ~ZgmoS>o `mZr gXa H$m ©emio_Ü o ^mJ KoVbm.

àW_df© {dYr - dmX{ddmX ñnYm©

àW_ df© {dYr Aä`mgH«$_mgmR>r àdoe KoVboë`m {dÚmÏ`m©gmR>r Xadfuà_mUo `mhr dfu dmX{ddmX ñnY}Mo Am`moOZ {XZm§H$16 Am°JñQ> amoOr H$aÊ`mV Ambo. gXa ñnY}_Ü o EHy$U 17 {dÚmÏ`mªZr gh^mJ KoVbm. `m ñnY}Mo {df` nwT>rbà_mUoR>odÊ`mV Ambo hmoVo.

1) bmoH$nmb {~bmÀ`m àñVm{dV H$m`ÚmgmR>r Am_aU CnmofU `mo½` H$s A`mo½`?2) _ÚnmZ H$aÊ`mgmR>r d`mMr _`m©Xm H$m`ÚmZo {ZpíMV H$aUo ho _yb yV A{YH$mamÀ`m {déÕ Amho H$s Zmhr?3) {MÌnQ>m§Mo nmoñQ>a añË`mdaVr Am{U gmd©O{ZH$ dhmZm§daVr bmdÊ`mÀ`m {damoYmVrb VH«$mar _hmZJanm{bHo$Zo ¿`mì`mV

H$s Zmhr?4) _hmamîQ´>m_Ü o JwQ>Im~§Xr `mo½` {H$ A`mo½`?

`m ñnY}_Ü o gh^mJr Pmboë`m ñnY©H$m§n¡H$s -

1) àW_ nm[aVmo{fH$ … 1) a§OZr H¥$îUZ² 2) ñdmVr ~mi Q>|~o

2) {ÛVr` nm[aVmo{fH$ … {dH$me Hw$_ma

3) V¥Vr` nm[aVmo{fH$ … 1) XodH$s Z§XZ qgJ 2) _mo{hZr gmdbm

VgoM CÎmoOZmW© ~{jgo … 1) hf©dY©Z Im§~oQ>o 2) CÁÁdbm AmamoQ>o 3) {dH$mg Am§~oQ>H$a

`m {dÚmÏ`mªZm XoÊ`mV Ambr. gXa ñnY}gmR>r narjH$ åhUyZ gm¡. lr{dÚm O`mHw$_ma Am{U gm¡. a§OZ Omoer `m§Zr H$m_nm{hbo. Ë`mM~amo~a gm¡. {X{jVm Jwáo `m§Zr gyÌg§MmbZ Ho$bo. {dÚmÏ`mªÀ`m CËñ\y$V© à{VgmXm_Ü o hr ñnYm© nma nS>br.

gßQ>|~a 2012

"{d{Yk'' Mo àH$meZ

_hm{dÚmb`mMm dm{f ©H$ A§H$ (2011-2012)""{d{Yk'' Mo àH$meZ ì oÌo gm§½ o mo {dÚmnrR>, OnmZ MoS>m°. {_{e`mo moZmo d _§S>imMo H$m`m©Ü`j S>m°. {dO` ~oS>oH$a`m§À`m hñVo {X. 5 gßQ>|~a 2012 {ejH$ {XZr H$aÊ`mVAmbo. gXa H$m ©H«$_ hm Wmoabo ~mOramd noedo g^mJ¥h oWoAm`mo{OV H$aÊ`mV Ambm hmoVm. mdoir AZoH$ _mÝ`dam§MrCnpñWVr hmoVr.

{ejH$ {XZ gmOam

_hm{dÚmb`m_Ü o {X. 5 gßQ>|~a 2012 amoOr {dÚmWu _§S>imÀ`m _mÜ`_mVyZ {ejH$ {XZ gmOam H$aÊ`mV Ambm.`mdoir àmÜ`mnH$m§Zr d {dÚmÏ`mªZr Ë`m§Mo {dMma ì`º$ Ho$bo.

5 gßQ>|~a 2012 - {dYr _hm{dÚmb`"{d{Yk' àH$meZ


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

Visit of Japanese DelegationWelcome of Prof. Dr. Michio Yano of Kyoto Sangyo University

Japanese Students with our Students! Japanese Students in our Library

OnmZr à{V{ZYtMr oQ> …

13 OnmZr {dÚmÏ`mªZr Ë`m§À`m àm. S>m°. {_M© mZmo Kyoto Sangyo University, Japan m§À`mgh {dYr _hm{dÚmb`mg{XZm§H$ 6 gßQ>|~a 2012 amoOr oQ> {Xbr. àmÜ`mnH$ {dZmoX dmK d XmoZ {dÚmWuZrZr gXa à{V{ZYr§Zm _§S>imÀ`m DR VN

BRIM'S _YyZ gÝ_mZnyd©H$ _hm{dÚmb`m§V AmUbo. nwînJwÀN>mZo gdmªMo ñdmJV Ho$ë`mZ§Va MhmnmZmMm H$m ©H«$_ Pmbm.à^mar àmMm`m© lr_Vr lr{dÚm O`mHw$_ma `m§Zr nm°da nm°BªQ> À`m _mÜ`_mVyZ ^maVr` Ý`m` ì`dñWm Am{U {ejU `m {df`mdaWmoS>Š`mV {ddoMZ Ho$bo. {dÚmÏ`mªZr ^OZ d emñÌr` Jm`Z JmD$Z _§S>irMo _Zmoa§OZ Ho$bo. {dÚmÏ`m©Zr H$mT>boë`m am§JmoirMo{deof H$m¡VwH$ H$aÊ`mV Ambo. àm. `mZmo d gd© {dÚmÏ`mªZm _hm{dÚmb`mH$Sy>Z oQ> XoÊ`mV Ambr. hm ZdrZ AZw d gdmªZm\$ma AmdS>bm.


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

1) {d. à. _§. Mo R>m. Z. nm. {dYr _hm{dÚmb`mMr {dÚm{W©Zr lr_Vr lrXodr Aæ`a {hZo _w§~B© {dÚmnrR>mÀ`m E{àb 2012À`m V¥Vr` df© {dYr n[ajo_Ü o {dÚmnrR>mV àW_ H«$_m§H$ {_i{dbm. {VZo 800 n¡H$s 540 JwU {_i{dbo.

2) {dYr _hm{dÚmb`mMo {dÚmWu A) {dßbdr gmoZmbH$a, ~) A_¥Vm ~wéS>o `m§Zr Zmar JwéghmZr {dYr _hm{dÚmb`CëhmgZJa `m§Zr Am`mo{OV Ho$boë`m {dYr _§WZ ñnY}_Ü o ^mJ KoD$Z {XZm§H$ 01.09.2012 amoOr {ÛVr` nm[aVmo{fH${_i{dbo.

3) Or. Oo. AS>dmUr {dYr _hm{dÚmb`mZo Am`mo{OV Ho$bobm {XZm§H$ 15.9.2012 À`m h[ae _oamoar`Z dŠV¥©d ñnY}_Ü o{dYr _hm{dÚmb`mMo Hw$. a§OZr H¥$îUZ Am{U {dH$mf Hw$_ma `m§Zr ^mJ KoVbm.

4) {S>dmBZ B§{S> m wW Agmo{gEeZ m§Zr {XZm§H$ 8.9.2012 amoOr Am`mo{OV Ho$boë`m ""{ejm Bd_ {dÚm'' m MMm©gÌm_Ü o{dYr _hm{dÚmb`mÀ`m à^mar àmMm`m© lr_Vr lr{dÚm O`mHw$_ma m§Zr gh^mJ Zm|X{dbm, "Current & future prospects

of value based reformation of education system" hm MMm©gÌmMm {df` hmoVm. gXa MMm©gÌmMo CX²KmQ>Z _w§~B©{dÚmnrR>mMo Hw$bJwé S>m°. doiwH$a `m§À`m hñVo Pmbo.

5) {dYr {d^mJ _w§~B© {dÚmnrR> d \$moa_ \$m°a \o$Aa OpñQ>g `m§Mm gm¡OÝ`mZo {XZm§H$ 13.9.2012 amoOr Am`mo{OV H$aÊ`mVAmboë`m Ý`m`rH$ gwYmaUm `m MMm©gÌmV {d{Y _hm{dÚmb`mÀ`m à^mar àmMm`m© lr_Vr lr{dÚm O`mHw$_ma `m§Zr ^mJKoVbm.

6) {dYr _hm{dÚmb`m_Ü o {XZm§H$ 14.9.2012 amoOr qhXr {Xdg gmOam H$aÊ`mV Ambm. gXa {Xder dŠV¥©Ëd ñnY}MoAm`moOZ H$aÊ`mV Ambo hmoVo. narjH$ åhUyZ A°S>. ñdmVr {gÝhm d A°S>. A§~a Omoer `m§Zr H$m_ nmhrbo. "X`m _aU',_w§~B© bmoH$b Q´>oZ, Am` bìh B§S>r`m, `m gma»`m {df`m§da {dÚmÏ`mªZr CËñ\y$V© ^mfU Ho$bo. Imbrb {dÚmWu ho ñnY}Mo{dOoVo R>abo. 1. {dH$mf Hw$_ma (àW_ {dYr) 2. Hw$. {àVr (àW_ {dYr) 3. amohrV e_m© (àW_ {dYr)

7) {dYr _hm{dÚmb`m_Ü o {XZm§H$ 14.9.2012 amoOr B§J«Or {Z~§Y ñnY}Mo Am`moOZ àW_ {dYrÀ`m {dÚmÏ`m©gmR>r H$aÊ`mVAmbo hmoVo. gXa ñnY}gmR>r "\$merMr {ejm' "BÀN>m VoWo _mJ©' ^maVmVrb Jar~r B. {df` R>odÊ`mV Ambo hmoVo. gXañnY}_Ü o Imbrb {dÚmWu {dOoVo R>abo. 1. a§OZ H¥$îUZ (àW_) 2. lwVr Eg. ({ÛVr`) 3. Hw$_a d|H$Q>oe (V¥Vr`)

8) {dYr _hm{dÚmb`m_Ü o All India Report À`m _mH}$Q>tJ {Q>_ Zo {XZm§H$ 21.9.2012 amoOr Ë`m§Mm Report Am{U ZdrZ`moOZm `m{df`r {dÚmWuZm _mJ©Xe©Z Ho$bo.

9) S>m°. S>r. dm`. nmQ>rb {dYr _hm{dÚmb`, Zdr _w§~B© `m§Zr Am`mo{OV Ho$boë`m ghmì`m Am§Va _hm{dÚmb`rZ _wQ> H$moQ>©ñnY}_Yo Amnë`m H$m°boO_YyZ gh^mJr Pmboë`m amo{hV e_m©, àW_ df© {dYr, `m {dÚmÏ`m©Zo ""CËH¥$îQ> g§emoYH$'' honm[aVmo{fH$ {_i{dbo. (06.7.12)

Am°ŠQ>mo~a 2012

1) w. Or. gr. À`m _mÜ`_mVyZ {XZm§H$ 30.9.2012 d 1.10.2012 amoOr AH$mobm oWo XmoZ {XdgmMo {e~ramMo Am`moOZH$aÊ`mV Ambo hmoVo. "Consumer Protection & Welfare in Global Economy sector - 2012 hm {e~ramMm {df`hmoVm. gXa {e~ramV VPM'S TMC {dYr _hm{dÚmb`mÀ`m à^mar àmMm`m© lr_Vr lr{dÚm O`mHw$_ma m§Zr "Consumer

Protection Models & Consumer Protection Act, 1986 " `m {df`m§da Ë`m§Mm à~§Y gmXa Ho$bm. gm¡. lr{dÚmO`mHw$_ma m§Zr Adjudicatory Bodies and Redressal Authorities m gÌmMo AÜ`j åhUyZ H$m_ nm{hbo. {e~ramMoCX²KmQ>Z _mZZr` Ý`m`mYre lr. AemoH$ ~m°Z, AÜ`j amîQ´>r` Cn^moŠVm H${_eZ `m§À`m hñVo Pmbo.

3) {dÚmÏ mªgmR>r gamd narjoMo Am moOZ gÌ- I, III Am{U V À m {dÚmÏ mªgmR>r H$aÊ mV Ambo. Ë mMo doimnÌH$ nwT>rbà_mUo hmoVo-doi - 6 Vo 9 g§Ü`mH$mir


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

{XZm§H$ àW_ df© {ÛVr` df© V¥Vr` df©

15.10.12 H$m_Jma H$m`Xm àemgH$s` H$m`Xm {XdmUr à{H«$`m H$m`Xm

16.10.12 H$ama H$m`Xm H$m¡Qw>§~rH$ \$m¡OXmar à{H«$`m

17.10.12 H$m`ÚmÀ`m ^mfm H§$nZr Am§VaamîQ´>r` H$m`Xm

Am{U B§J«Or Am{U _mZd A{YH$ma

18.10.12 ZwH$gmZ ^anmB© H$m`Xm _mb_Îmm hñVm§Va H$m`Xm H$m`ÚmMm-AÝ``mW©

B§J«Or Am{U _amR>r àíZn{ÌH$m àmÜ`mnH$m§Zr V`ma Ho$ë`m. àíZn{ÌHo$ g§X^m©V MMm© Am{U _mJ©Xe©Z àmÜ`mnH$m§Zr Ho$bo.Ë`m_Yo CÎman{ÌH$m boIZ d Ë`mVrb Amdí`H$ JmoîQ>r `mda ^a XoÊ`mV Ambm.

Zmoìh|~a 2012

{dÚmnrR> n[ajm (27 Zmoìh|~a - 13 {S>g|~a)

A) e - _mJ© (E - way)

hçm dfu {dÚmnrR>mV\}$ àíZn{ÌH$m g§JUH$s` _mÜ`_m_m\©$V nmR>{dÊ`mV Amë`m. _hm{dÚmb`mV\}$ àíZn{ÌH$m nmhUo,_w{ÐV H$aUo d Amdí`Š`VoZwgma àVr H$mT>Êmo hçmgmR>r Amdí`H$ AgUmè`m gmYZm§Mr CnbãYVm H$aÊ`mV Ambr. hçmH$m`m©V {dÚm àgmaH$ _§S>imV\}$ {_imboë`m ghH$m`m©~Ôb Amåhr Ë`m§Mo G$Ur AmhmoV.

{dÚmnrR>mV\}$ àíZn{ÌH$m§À`m g§JUH$s` _mJm©_m\©$V CnbãYVoMm A{^ê$n gamd {X. 22 d 23 Zmoìh|~a amoOr gH$mir11.30 dmOVm KoÊ`mV Ambm. {dÚmnrR>mV\}$ àmo. àH$me _moH$b (JìhZ©_|Q> {dYr _hm{dÚmb`, MM©JoQ>) hçm§Mr Om°BÝQ> Mr\$H§$S>ŠQ>a Ë`mM~amo~a à^mar àmMm`m© `m§Mr Mr\$ H§$S>ŠQ>a åhUyZ narjoda {Z wŠVr H$aÊ`mV Ambr.

~) àdoenÌ XwéñVr (Hall Ticket correction)

{dÚmnrR>mV\}$ _hm{dÚmb`mVrb àmMm`mªZm àdoen{ÌHo$V Agboë`m MwH$m XwéñV H$aUo d Ë`m g§X^m©V {dÚmnrR>mbmH$i{dUo hr O~m~Xmar gmon{dÊ`mV Ambr hmoVr.

{S>g|~a 2012

1) Amnë`m H$m°boOMo àm. {_WwZ ~ZgmoS>o `m§Zr nwUo {dÚmnrR>m_Ü o {dYr {d^mJmZo Am`mo{OV Ho$boë`m gmV {Xdgr` {dYrg§emoYZ H$m ©emio_Yo gh^mJ Zm|X{dbm.

2) Adv. Prabhakar Hegde Lecture Series was organized in Patanjali Hall, VPM Campusby Vidhi Foundation in cooperation into the VPM’S TMC Law College, Thane. Theprogramme was from 10am to 2pm. It was attended by advocates & students ofthe college.

The following lectures were held -

1. "Rights of Women” by Honourable Addl. District Judge, Shri Deshpande

2. IT & Legal Profession” by Advocate Shri Patil, Member of Bar Council of Mah.& Goa.

3. “Human Rights” by Former President, Thane Bar Association,,Adv. Shri Prakash Bhosle

4. “Appellate Advocacy in Civil Matters” by Adv. Shri Sandesh Patil


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

Best Young Student “ Law Practice Aspirant Award”

Ms. Namratha Bobade (LLB pass out from 2011-12 batch) was selected for theaward based on the criteria - high scores in III LLB practical training, regularity in college& library and enthusiasm in participating in all activities of the college apart from beingof age less than 30 years.

The award consisting of a trophy & certificate was sponsored by Vidhi Foundation.

3) {XZm§H$ 15-12-2012 amoOr Omoer ~oS>oH$a _hm{dÚmb` Am`mo{OV "Oå_y H$mpí_a EH$ g_ñ`m' `m {df`mdarbamîQ´>r` MMm© gÌmg {dYr _hm{dÚmb`mÀ`m à^mar àmMm`m© gm¡. lr{dÚm O`mHw$_ma d àmÜ`mnH$ lr. {_WwZ ~ZgmoS>oCnpñWV am{hbo.

4) {dYr _hm{dÚmb`mV {XZm§H$ 17 Vo 21 {S>g|~a 2012 Xaå`mZ {Vgè`m dfm©À`m {dÚmÏ`mªgmR>r àmË`{jH$ à{ejUAm`mo{OV Ho$bo hmoVo. `mdoiog Ë`m§Zm {d{dY _wÚm§{df`r _mJ©Xe©Z H$aÊ`mV Ambo.

5) {XZm§H$ 27 Zmoìh|~a Vo 13 {S>g|~a m H$mbmdYrV {dYr _hm{dÚmb`mV {dÚmnrR>mV\}$ KoÊ`mV Amboë`m narjm ì`dpñWVnma nS>ë`m.

6) _o 2012 amoOr _w§~B© {dÚmnrR>mV\}$ KoÊ`mV Amboë`m V¥Vr` df© {dYr n[ajoV {dYr _hm{dÚmb`mMr {dÚm{W©Zr lr_VrlrXodr Aæ`a hçm _w§~B© {dÚmnrR>mVyZ àW_ H«$_m§H$mZo CÎmrU© Pmë`m.

7) ghg§MmbH$ nZdob m§MoH$Sy>Z {ejHo$Va nXo aÊ`mgmR>r Zm haH$V à_mUnÌ àmá Pmbo. H$m`m©b` A{YjH$-AZwgw{MVO_mVr, _w»`{b{nH$-AZwgw{MV O_mVr VgoM XmoZ J«§Wmb` n[aMa EH$ AZwgw{MV OmVr d EH$ AZwgw{MV O_mVr.

OmZodmar 2013

1) 2 OmZodmar Vo 5 OmZodmar Xaå`mZ V¥Vr` dfm©À`m {dÚmÏ`m©gmR>r S´>m[âQ>§J `m {df`mdarb {deof ì`m»`mZm§Mo Am`moOZH$aÊ`mV Ambo hmoVo. 7 OmZodmar amoOr n{hbr A{^én Ý`m`mb` narjm KoÊ`mV Ambr.

2) _w§~B© {dÚmnrR>mÀ`m {dYr narjm Zmoìh|~a 2012 À`m narjoMo nona VnmgUr H|$ÐmMo H$m_ {dYr _hm{dÚmb`mV {XZm§H$ 3.12.2012Vo 19.1.2013 Xaå`mZ g§nÞ Pmbo. gw_mao 4110 CÎman{ÌH$m§Mr VnmgUr `m H$mbmdYrV H$aÊ`mV Ambr.

3) 11 OmZodmar 2013 amoOr ñnrH$. An. b¢{JH$ AË`mMmam{déÕ dH¥$Ëd ñnYm© d nmoñQ>a _oqH$J ñnYmªMo Am`moOZH$aÊ`mV Ambo hmoVo. nmoñQ>a _oqH$J ñnY}bm à{VgmX {_imbm Zmhr Va dH¥$Ëd ñnY}V 11 {dÚmÏ`mªZr ^mJ KoVbm.

ñnY}Mm {ZH$mb - 1) a§OZr H¥$îUZ² (àW_ H«$_m§H$) 2) H¥$îUm H$m_W ({ÛVr` H«$_m§H$) 3) {àVr _hmOZ (V¥Vr` H«$_m§H$)

dH¥$Ëd ñnYm© _amR>r Am{U B§J«Or ^mfo_YyZ KoÊ`mV Ambr.4) ~m°å~o H$mCpÝgb Am°\$ A°Ho$S>o{_{e`Z A°ÝS> àmo\o$eZëg `m§Zr 'Prevention of Rising Crime in Indian Society and

Preventive Detention Laws' `m {df`mdaVr {dÚmnrR>mÀ`m H$m°ÝhdoHo$eZ hm°b_Ü o n[ag§dmXmMo Am`moOZ Ho$bo hmoVo.Am_Mo H$mhr {dÚmWu CnpñWV hmoVo.

5) 26 OmZodmar 2013 amoOr amÁ`ñVar` ZmZr nmbIrdmbm dH¥$Ëd ñnY}V {dYr _hm{dÚmb`mMo {dÚmWu lr. O oeJmoIbo-V¥Vr` df© {dYr m§Zr {ÛVr` nm[aVmo{fH$ {_i{dbo. "The Recent Handling of the Facebook cases by

the Police & the Need for Reforms."

`m {df`mda ^mfU Ho$bo. amoI aŠH$_, àepñVnÌH$ Am{U nwñVHo$ Ë`m§Zm ~{jg åhUyZ {_imbo.6) ggoŠg {dÚmnrR>m_Ü o Eb. Eb. E_². Aä`mgH«$_- 30 OmZodmar 2013 amoOr amoeZr ehm m§Zr ggoŠg {dÚmnrR>m_Ü o

Eb.Eb.E_². Aä`mgH«$_m_Ü o àdoe KoÊ`mg§X^m©V {dÚmÏ`mªZm _mJ©Xe©Z Ho$bo.

7) Amnë`m _hm{dÚmb`mVrb {H«$Ho$Q>Mr Q>r_ _w§~B© {dÚmnrR>mZo Am`mo{OV Ho$boë`m H«$sS>m ñnY}_Ü o 4 OmZodmar 2013`m VmaIog gh^mJr Pmbr.


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

8) St. Wilfred Law College, Panvel oWo {X. 9 OmZo. 2013 Am`mo{OV A{^ê$n Ý`m`mb` ñnY}_Ü o Amnë`m_hm{dÚmb`mVrb Hw$. {dßbdr gmoZmbH$a (II-L.L.B.) Am{U Hw$. A{bem ~wS>©o (II-L.L.B.) `m§Zr gh^mJ KoVbm.

9) {X. 31 OmZo. 2013 amoOr Ho$. gr. bm° H$m°boO Zo Am`mo{OV Ho$boë`m Client Counselling ñnY}_Ü o Amnë`m_hm{dÚmb`mVrb lr. gm¡JV hOam (III L.L.B.) d Hw$. A{bem ~wS>} (II L.L.B.) `m§Zr ^mJ KoVbm.

\o$~«wdmar 2013

1) {X. 27 \o$~«w. 2013 amoOr {dYr _hm{dÚmb`mV "_amR>r {Xdg' gmOam H$aÊ`mV Ambm. Ë`m {Z{_ÎmmZo "_amR>r Z¡nwÊ`MmMUr ñnYm© Am{U dŠV¥Ëd ñnYm©' Am`mo{OV H$aÊ`mV Ambr. _amR>r Z¡nwÊ` MmMUr ñnY}_Yrb {dOoVo.

1. _mohZ qZ~mbH$a (II L.L.B.) - àW_ H«$_m§H$ 2. g§Vmof {Jar (II L.L.B.) - {ÛVr` H«$_m§H$3. d¡embr nmQ>rb (I L.L.B.)- V¥Vr` H«$_m§H$

dŠV¥Ëd ñnYm© {dOoVo

1. d¡embr nmQ>rb (I L.L.B.) - àW_ H«$_m§H$ 2. _mohZ gy ©d§er (I L.L.B.) - {ÛVr` H«$_m§H$3. JUoe AmMm © (I L.L.B.) - V¥Vr` H«$_m§H$

2) {X. 17 d 18 \o$~w«. 2013 amoOr bmoH$ZoVo ì §H$Q>amd {hao _hm{dÚmb` Zm{eH$ m§À`m dVrZo amîQ>r` Am§Va _hm{dÚmb`rZdmX{ddmX ñnYm© "Rising Numbers of Criminals in Parliament & legislative Assemblies is disastrous for

democracy" `m {df`mda hmoVr. `m ñnY}_Ü o Amnë`m _hm{dÚmb`mVrb Hw$. H¥$îUm H$m_W Am{U Hw$. a§OZr H¥$îUZàW_ df© Eb. Eb.~r. `m {dÚmÏ`mªZr gh^mJ KoVbm.

3) Amnë`m _hm{dÚmb`mVrb àm. {_WyZ ~ZgmoS>o m§Zr Ý y bm° H$m°boO nwUo oWo Am`mo{OV Ho$boë`m UGC nwañH¥$V go{_Zma_Ü oElectrol Reforms : Issues & challenges `m {df`mda {X. 23 \o$~w«. 2013 amoOr nona gmXa Ho$bm.

4) Ý y bm° H$m°boO _w§~B© m§Zr {X. 25 \o$~«w.2013 amoOr Am`mo{OV Hoo$boë`m AZwamJ Jm`Z ñnYm© m_Ü o Amnë`m _hm{dÚmb`mVrbHw$. _Ywam Xoenm§S>o `m§Zr gh^mJ Zm|X{dbm.

_mM© 20131. àmË`m{jH$ narjm

{X. 1 _mM© Am{U {X. 4 Vo 6 _mM© 2013 Xaå`mZ {dYr _hm{dÚmb`mVrb àW_, {ÛVr` Am{U V¥Vr` dfm©Vrb{dÚmÏ`mªÀ`m àmË`{jH$ narjm KoÊ`mV Amë`m. `m narjoMo {ZH$mb {X. 20 _mM© 2013 amoOr Omhra H$aÊ`mV Ambo. gXanarjoV Zmnmg Am{U J¡ahOa {dÚmÏ`mªgmR>r {X. 23, 25 Am{U 26 _mM© amoOr nwÝhm àmË`{jH$ narjm KoÊ`mV Amë`m. nwÝhmKoÊ`mV Amboë`m narjoMm {ZH$mb {X. 28 _mM© 2013 amoOr Omhra H$aÊ`mV Ambm.

2 .2 .2 .2 .2 . {X. 2 _mM© amoOr _w§~B© {dÚmnrR>mZo Am{U _hmamîQ> AÝS>a {à{dboÁS> {Q>Mg© Agmo{gEeZ m§Zr emhra A_aeoI g^mJ¥hm_Ü o"Guidelines for Implementation of Roster" `m {df`mdaVr H$m ©emioMo Am`moOZ Ho$bo hmoVo. S>m°. nr. Eg². _rZmAm. E. Eg.ES>r. Mr\$ goH«o$Q>ar GAD, _hmamîQ´> gaH$ma `m§Zr _mJ©Xe©Z Ho$bo. à^mar àmMm`m© lr{dÚm O`Hw$_ma Am{UH${ZîR> {b{nH$ gm¡. a§OZ H$a§XrH$a `m§Zr `m H$m ©emioV gh^mJ Zm|X{dbm.

3 .3 .3 .3 .3 . {X. 8 _mM© 2013 amoOr Consultation on Anti-Rape Laws & Policy `m {df`mda n[ag§dmXmMo Am`moOZ _w§~B©{dÚmnrR>mVrb H$m°ZìhmoHo$eZ hm°b_Ü o H$aÊ`mV Ambo hmoVo. {dYr {d^mJ Am{U ½bmo~b ìhrOZ B§{S>`m \$mD§$S>oeZ `m§Mog§ wŠV {dÚ_mZo `m H$m ©H«$_mMo Am`moOZ H$aÊ`mV Ambo hmoVo. gXa H$m ©H«$_mg gm¡. lr{dÚm O`Hw$_ma CnpñWV hmoË`m.`m H$m ©H«$_mMo CX²KmQ>Z _w»` Ý`m`mYre _w§~B© Cƒ Ý`m`mb` `m§Zr Ho$bo.


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

4. S>m°. ìhr. EZ. ~oS>oH$a dmX{ddmX ñnYm©

{X. 9 _mM© 2013 amoOr Xadfuà_mZo S>m°. ìhr.EZ. ~oS>oH$a dmX{ddmX ñnY}Mo Am`moOZ H$aÊ`mV Ambo hmoVo. `m ñnY}MoCX²KmQ>Z _mOr Ý`m`mYre Eg². Eg. Xoe_wI m§Zr Ho$bo. VgoM narjH$ åhUyZ {Zd¥Îm Ý`m`mYre lr. {eH}$ Am{U lr. amUo m§ZrñnY©H$m§Mo _yë`_mnZ Ho$bo.

Topics -

1) Hindu Marriage Act 1955 should be amended to specifically exclude suppression\misrepresentationof caste as a ground for nullity of marriage.

2) Public Inquiry Commissions are just waste of public money.

3) Criminal law amendment ordinance 2013 can achieve its avowed object.

Prize Winners -

àW_ nm[aVmo{fH$ CËH¥$ï> g§K - R>mUo {dYr _hm{dÚmb`1) H¥$îUm H$m_W 2) a§OZr H¥$îUZ

{ÛVr` nm[aVmo{fH$ - Ho$. gr. bm°. H$mboO1) ha|Ðnmb amUmdV 2) XodoÐ Xdo

V¥Vr` nm[aVmo{fH$ - àdrU Jm§Yr bm° H$m°boO1) ~oZOX BamUr 2) lÕm _§YmZm

CËH¥$ï> dºo$ - àW_ - H¥$îUm H$m_W - R>mUo {dYr _hm{dÚmb`{ÛVr` - a§OZr H¥$îUZ² - R>mUo {dYr _hm{dÚmb`V¥Vr` - ha|Ðnmb amUmdV - Ho$. gr. bm°. H$m°boO

5. gm§ñH¥${VH$ _hmoËgd : CÎmJ§

{X. 15, 16 _mM© 2013 amoOr {dYr _hm{dÚmb`mMm gm§ñH¥${VH$ _hmoËgd "CVw§J' Am`mo{OV H$aÊ`mV Ambm hmoVm.`m_Ü o H«$sS>m d H$bm {df`H$ {d{dY ñnYmªMo Am`moOZ H$aÊ`mV Ambo.

6. dm{f©H$ nm[aVmo{fH$ {dVaU g_ma§

{X. 17 _mM© 2013 amoOr dm{f©H$ nm[aVmo{fH$ {dVaU g_ma§ nma nS>bm. `m H$m ©H«$_mgmR>r à_wI nmhþUo gÝ_mZZr`lr. A{Zb Omoer Ý`m`mYre _w§~B© Cƒ Ý`m`mb` ho CnpñWV hmoVo. JwUd§V {dÚmÏ`mªMm gËH$ma lr. Omoer ga `m§Mo hñVoH$aÊ`mV Ambm.

lr. Eg. ìhr. H$a§XrH$a, Á oð> gXñ` ìhr. nr. E_. ho H$m ©H«$_mMo AÜ`j hmoVo. Ë`m§À`m ^mfUm_Ü o Ë`m§Zr {dÚmÏ`mªZmJm§ r`m©Zo Aä`mg H$aÊ`mMm Am{U J«§Wmb` d dJm©Vrb {ejUmMm Cn`moJ H$aÊ`mMm gëëmm {Xbm. à^mar àmMm`m© gm¡.lr{dÚm O`Hw$_ma `m§Zr CnpñWVm§Mo ñdmJV Ho$bo. àm. {dZmoX dmK `m§Zr Am^ma àXe©Z Ho$bo. gd© H$m ©H«$_mMo g§MmbZ g§Ho$Vbobo Am{U H¥$îUm H$m_W `m XmoZ {dÚmÏ`mªZr Ho$bo.

Address of Honourable Justice Shri A.R. Joshi

Honourable Justice Shri. A. R. Joshi was impressed with the infrastructure of the college & theperformance of the students. He specially appreciated Mrs. Sridevi Iyer who secured 67.5% and topped theUniversity in merit in the final year LL.B. exams.

Honourable Justice Shri. A. R. Joshi in his address to the students recalled his days in college in thevery same Thane Law College as student of Law. He vividly recounted how a Perry Mason novel by ErleStanley Gardner transformed him from a lab analyst to a lawyer & then a judge. He affectionately advisedthe students to know their goal and realize that everything is within them. He emphasised on being goodhuman beings in the first place. Justice A. R. Joshi showed anguish over increase in crimes by young


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

offenders. He felt the need of parents spending quality time with their children. He reminded the studentsof the mantra to success: “Determination, Dedication & Discipline”. His simplicity, brilliance and affectiongreatly inspired all in the hall.

7 .7 .7 .7 .7 . {X. 24 _mM© 2013 amoOr lr. {Za§OZ S>mdIao E_.Eb.gr. Am{U g_Ýd` à{VîR>mZ `m§Zr Youth and Competitive

Examinations for Public Servies `m {df`mdaVr MMm©gÌmMo Am`moOZ EZ. Ho$. Q>r. H$m°boO, R>mUo oWo Ho$bo hmoVo.à^mar àmMm`m© lr{dÚm O`Hw$_ma `m§Zm ^maVr` g§{dYmZmdaVr ^mfU XoÊ`mgmR>r ~mob{dÊ`mV Ambo hmoVo.

8 .8 .8 .8 .8 . {X. 30 _mM© 2013 amoOr {dYr _hm{dÚmb`mV {ejHo$Va H$_©Mmè`m§À`m aVrgmR>r _wbmIVr KoÊ`mV Amë`m. Ë`m_YyZJ«§Wmb` n[aMa nXmgmR>r 1 Eg.gr d 1 Eg.Q>r. Aem XmoZ C_oXdmam§Mr Zo_UyH$ H$aÊ`mV Ambr.

9 .9 .9 .9 .9 . {X. 30 _mM© 2013 amoOr _w§~B© {dÚmnrR>mVrb {dYr {d^mJmZo Am`mo{OV Ho$boë`m E_.gr. N>mJbm boŠMa {garO_Yogdm}ƒ Ý`m`mb`mMo _mOr Ý`m`mYre lr. H$mQ>Oy m§Zr Ancient India Jurisprudence & Modern Jurisprudence m{df`mda ì`m»`mZ {Xbo. {ÛVr` df© {dYrÀ`m {dÚmÏ`mª~amo~a àm. {_WwZ ~ZgmoS>o `m§Zr `m H$m ©H«$_mV gh^mJ Zm|X{dbm.

E{àb 2013

J«§Wmb`mV Z{dZ ^aVr

AZwgw{MV OmVrgmR>r Agboë`m J«§Wmb` n[aMa nXmda lr. dm_Z XmXm H$ma§S>o m§Mr nXmoÝVr H$aÊ`mV Ambr. Vo H$m_mda{X. 1 E{àb 2013 amoOr éOy Pmbo. VgoM lr. g§Vmof Pw§Jao `m§Mr AZwgw{MV O_mVr dJm©_YyZ J«§Wmb` n[aMa `m nXmgmR>r{ZdS> H$aÊ`mV Ambr. Vo H$m_mda {X. 15 E{àb 2013 amoOr éOy Pmbo.

gamd n[ajm

Semester II, IV, VI À`m {dÚmÏ`mªgmR>r {X. 1,2,3,4 E{àb 2013 amoOr gamd n[ajm KoÊ`mV Ambr. {dÚmÏ`mªZm`mMm Cn`moJ {dÚmnrR>mMr n[ajm XoVmZm ìhmdm hm `m _mJMm CX²Xoe hmoVm. àË oH$ nona Z§Va {dÚmÏ`mª~amo~a CÎmamg Amdí`H$AgUmè`m ~m~r{df`r MMm© H$aÊ`mV Ambr. VgoM CÎma H$go {bhmdo, Ë`mV Amdí`H$ AgUmao _wX²Xo `m ~m~V _mJ©Xe©ZH$aÊ`mV Ambo.

àmË`{jH$ gamd n[ajm

àmË`{jH$ n[ajoV Zmnmg Pmboë`m n{hë`m, Xwgè`m Am{U {Vgè`m dfm©À`m {dÚmÏ`mªgmR>r naV n[ajm KoÊ`mV Ambr. hrn[ajm 5 E{àb Am{U 6 E{àb 2013 amoOr KoÊ`mV Ambr Am{U `mMm {ZH$mb hm 8 E{àb 2013 amoOr bmdÊ`mV Ambm.

à^mar àmMm`m© lr_Vr lr{dÚm O`Hw$_ma hçm§Zr Amnë`m Ph.D g§X^m©Vrb Course Work nyU© Ho$bm. gÌ Course

Work _Ü o gmXarH$aU `mMm g_mdoe hmoVm. 100 JwU Agboë`m emoY {Z~§YmMo erf©H$

"A Study of the Effectiveness of the Remedies under Consumer Protection Act, 1986-A ConsumerRights Perspectives."

""J«mhH$ g§ajU H$m`Xm 1986 A§VJ©V Cnm` `moObm§À`m à^mdr H$m ©j_VoMm Aä`mg-J«mhH$mÀ`m A{YH$mam§À`mÑîQ>rH$moZmVyZ''

{dÚmnrR> n[ajm - Xya{ejU {d^mJ Am{U {d{Y À`m n[ajm

Am_Mo _hm{dÚmb` {ÛVr` df© dm{UÁ` `m n[ajogmR>r {X. 1 Vo 9 E{àb 2013 `m H$mbmdYrgmR>r n[ajm H|$Ð hmoVo.{dYr (LLB) À`m n[ajm 10 E{àb nmgyZ 8 _o n ªV hmoË`m.

{dÚmnrR>mMm H|$Ðr` VnmgUr H$m ©H«$_

{dYr n[ajoÀ`m H|$Ðr` VnmgUr H$m ©H«$_ hm {X. 15.4.2013 amoOr nmgyZ Mmby Pmbm. VgoM hm H$m ©H«$_ _o 2013n ªV Mmby amhÊ`mMr eŠ`Vm Amho.


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

University Exams Nov. 2012

Top Ten

First LL.B. (Ist Sem)

1 Ramchandrani Reshma G. 257

2 Dighe Poorva Sanjeev 255

3 Dongre Prashant Baban 253

4 Saraf Swati Girish 244

5 Bal Tembe Swati B. 243

6 Haria Priyanka N. 231

7 Kakade Reshma S. 230

8 Borlikar Kaveri Sanjay 229

8 Lohia Priyanka Gajanan 229

9 Ganatra Jayesh Kiritkumar 228

10 Sharma Tripti Mahesh 227

Second LL.B. (IIIrd Sem)

1 Kharkar Pauravi Umakant 250

2 Marchant Nitin Sultanali 241

3 Almedia Avilene Sinclair 238

4 Dineshkumar Xavier Dhas 233

4 Doifode Rupesh Ramesh 233

4 Kandarkar Kshitija Abhijeet 233

4 Ninawe Atul Gangadhar 233

5 Baval Rupa Arvind 232

6 Naik Sheetal Ganesh 231

6 Sawant Shaila Abaji 231

7 Gureshi Nazmeen Mohd. Ekram230

8 Khanolkar Akshata Anand 229

8 Khosla Rashmi Rajesh 229

9 Lonkar Sampada C. 228

10 Doshi Pooja Prafulchandra 227

1 Gokhale Jayesh Gopal 245

2 Mishra Aditya Ramesh 238

3 Shah Manali N. 232

3 Tupe Priya Mahesh 232

4 Parwani Bharat H. 230

5 Ghosh Kalpita K. 229

6 Jajvalya Raghavan 227

7 Mirashi Priya Tanaji 226

7 Mohite Sanjay R. 226 Congratulations!

Third LL.B. (Vth Sem)

8 Akolkar Rupali S. 224

8 Kulkarni Narayan M. 224

9 Kand Sayalee P. 223

10 Patwardhan Pallavi B. 222


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

First LL.B. – April 2012

1 Dubey Trishala S. 491

2 Baval Rupa A. 480

3 Kharkar Pauravi U. 463

3 Salunke Prakash S. 463

4 Doifode Rupesh R. 458

5 Sawant Shaila A. 456

6 Durando Kathryn A. 454

7 Naik Sheetal G. 453

8 Merchant Nitin S. 449

8 Panjwani Nisha D. 449

9 Doshi Pooja P. 446

10 Kandarkar Kshitija A. 445

College Toppers!

Second LL.B. – April 2012

1 Gokhale Jayesh G. 496

2 Ghosh Kaplita K. 471

3 Joglekar Prathamesh S. 466

4 Jaivalya Raghavan 463

5 Vishwakarma Dipti S. 459

6 Sorte Trunal P. 450

7 Hanchate Deepali C. 441

8 Asinkar Dipali D. 439

8 Senghani Miral M. 439

9 Kand Sayalee P. 437

10 Bhinde Sanket T. 436

Third LL.B. – April 2012

1 Iyer Sridevi K. 540

2 Koli Archana K. 488

3 Hajirnis Pranjali M. 465

4 Gargatge Gouri A. 461

5 Iyer Priya P. 457

5 Bhagchandani Girish R. 457

6 Pakkath Sreena S. 455

7 Gangawane Nilesh S. 453

8 Vyas Karishma J. 450

9 Shendye Nikita P. 449

10 Shah Manish G. 443

10 Bhagwat Shilpa V. 443

10 Joshi Rohit D. 443

Congr

atul

atio

ns!


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

Academic Prizes 2011 – 2012List Of Students Securing Top Positions

At Law Exams Held In April 2012

1. Following Endowment Prizes are awarded to Mrs. Iyer Sridevi for having stood FIRSTat THIRD LL.B Exam. Held in April, 2012. (540/800)i) Late Shri Gunakar Joshi cash prize of Rs. 150/-ii) Late Shri Viju Natekar cash prize of Rs. 45/-Also awarded Medal with Merit Certificate

Mrs. Sridevi Iyer was awarded four Gold Medals & the following prizes for being topper inLL.B by merit:1. The Late Advocate S. A. Keluskar Prize2. The Sir Lawrence Jenkins Scholarship3. The Late Shri. Noshirwan H. Jhabvala memorial Cash Prize4. The J. I. Mehta Endowment Prize

In the convocation ceremony of University held on 30th December 2012 she receivedmedals & prizes at the hands of Honorable Chief Minister of Maharashtra Shri PrithivirajChavan in the ceremony presided over by his Excellency, The president of India, ShriPranab Mukherji.

2. Ms. Koli Archana Kalpak Stood Second at Third LL.B. Exam. held in April 2012(488/800) Medal with Merit Certificate

3. Ms. Hajirnis Pranali Milind Stood Third at Third LL.B. Exam held in April 2012(459/800) Medal with Merit Certificate

4. Late Shri Viju Natekar endowment prize of Rs. 45/- to Ms. Jagdhane Kanchan GajananHaving stood First at Third LL.B. Exam. held in April 2012 from amongst the backwardclass students (444/800).

5. Miss Gargate Gauri Ashok has been awarded a late Shri B. S. Bagade Cash prize ofRs. 200/- for having secured highest marks in 'Law of Evidence' (65/100) at ThirdYear LL.B exam. April 2012.

6. Mr. Gokhale Jayesh Gopal Stood First at Second LL.B. Exam. held in April, 2012(496/800) Medal with Merit Certificate

7. Miss Ghosh Kalpita K. Stood First at Second LL.B. Exam. held in April 2012(471/800) Medal with Merit Certificate

8. Mr. Joglekar Prathamesh S. Stood Second at Second LL.B. Exam. held in April 2012(466/800) Medal with Merit Certificate

9. Ms. Dubey Trishala S. Stood First at First LL.B. Exam. held in April 2012(491/800) Medal with Merit Certificate

10. Ms. Baval Rupa Arvind Stood Second at First LL.B. Exam. held in April, 2012(480/800) Medal with Merit Certificate

11. Ms. Lonkar Sampada C. Stood Third at First LL.B. Exam. held in April 2012(466/800) Medal with Merit Certificate

12. Ms. Kandarkar Kshitija Abhijeet & Ms. Sawant Shaila Abaji has been awarded a lateShri B.S. Bagade Cash Prize of Rs. 200/- for having secured highest marks in'Constitutional Law' (62/100) at First year LL.B. exam, April 2012.

13. " Shri. Damodar Vinayak Pendse" Prize for Best Disciplined student during the Academicyear 2011-2012 has been awarded to -

1. Mr. Anand Mahabal Shetty & Ms. Pooja Prafulchandra Doshi I.LL.B.2. Ms. Kalpita Ghosh & Mr. Saugat Hazjra II - LL.B3. Mr. Shah Manish Gunsen & Mr. Bhushan Dnyandev Mhatre III - LL.B.


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

Best Disciplined Student Award"Shri. Damodar Vinayak Pendse" Prize for Best Disciplined student during the Academicyear 2011-2012 has been awarded to -

1. Mr. Anand Shetty & Ms. Pooja Doshi I.LL.B.

2. Ms. Kalpita Ghosh & Mr. Saugat Hazjra II - LL.B

3. Mr. Manish Shah & Mr. Bhushan Mhatre III - LL.B.

Legal Aid CellA legal Aid clinic has been established in our college on 11th March 2008. Under

this clinic we have organised different programmes at various places in Thane. Ourstudents have also participated in number of events & camps.

On 6th January 2012, as per the provision of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 &legal services rules 2010, we started providing free legal services to the poor & needyperson. On every Friday & Saturday between 4 to 6 pm. Prof. Vinod H. Wagh isappointed as incharge of the clinic.

In the year 2012-13 we received less response as we had not reached to the needypeople. In order to get good response, in the month of September 2012 we publishednews about the legal aid cell in different news papers. Then after we started receivinggood response from the poor & needy people. To maintain their records & to verifywhether they really need legal aid because of their poverty, we have started taking theirundertaking.

In 2012 & 2013 different people have approached us for seeking advice on differentissues. 70% of these cases were concerned with domestic matters.

Some students & their parents have also approached us. Some students showedtheir interest in working with cell. Our teaching staff have also helped the legal aid cell.

Cultural Programme ReportThe Cultural Event held on 15th and 16th March 2013, named 'Uttung 2013', had

following events.

15th March 2013

1. Treasure Hunt 2. Citation Hunt3. Spell Check 4. Antakshari for staff

16th March 2013

1. Rangoli 2. Mahendi3. Singing 4. Talent Hunt5. Antakshari


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

Volunteers

1. Jayesh Tikhe IIIrd Year LLB

2. Sayali Apte IIIrd Year LLB

3. Anita Marathe IIIrd Year LLB

4. Madhura Sathe IIIrd Year LLB

5. Pranalee Pawar IIIrd Year LLB

6. Chetan Patil IInd Year LLB

7. Pooja Doshi IInd Year LLB

8. Priyanka Lahane IInd Year LLB

9. Sanket Lele IInd Year LLB

10. Mandar Bamble IInd Year LLB

11. Suchitra Sabale IInd Year LLB

12. Sushant Panchal IIIrd Year LLB

13. Jagruti Nigut IIIrd Year LLB

14. Kranti Abhange IIrd Year LLB

Special Thanks

1. Mayank Akole 2. Amol Pansare

Winners of Events

1. Treasure Hunt :

Winner :

1. Madhura Sathe IIIrd Year LLB 2. Pranalee Pawar IIIrd Year LLB3. Chetan Patil IInd Year LLB

2. Citation Hunt

1st Place

1. Rohit Sharma 1st Year LLB 2. Devakinandan Singh 1st Year LLB2nd Place

1. Rupesh Shinde IIIrd Year LLB 2. Suman Trivedi3. Spell Check

Winner

1. Sayyad Nusrat Jahan 2. Snehalata Kolte

4. Rangoli

1st Place Saroj Patil IInd Year LLB2nd Place Manasi Vichare IInd Year LLB3rd Place Ganesh Acharya

5. Singing

1st Place Madhura Deshpande2nd Place Sonam Tiwari IIIrd Year LLB3rd Place Anand Shetty IInd Year LLBConsoliation Prize Krishna Kamath Ist Year LLBConsoliation Prize Sanket Lele IInd Year LLB


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

6. Talent Hunt

1st Prize Ameya Kane IIIrd Year LLB

2nd Prize Snehalkumar Gaikwad IInd Year LLB

3rd Prize Vinod Hatkar IInd Year LLB

Anand Shetty IInd Year LLB

7. Mehendi

1st Prize Sayyad Nusrat Jahan

2nd Prize Ansari Nagma IIIrd Year LLB

8. Antakshari

Winner

1. Vinod Hadkar IInd Year LLB

2. Suchitra Sabale IInd Year LLB

3. Shreekant Harale IInd Year LLB

Gymkhana Report (Annual Sports)Winners in the sports events “Uttung 2013”

Carrom Singles (Boys)

First : Chetan Patil Second : Anand Shetty

Carrom Singles (Girls)

First : Shweta Vaity Second : Nagma Ansari

Mixed Doubles Carrom

First : Swapnil Bhosale & Madhura SatheSecond : Nitin Mhatre & Priya Beldar

Badminton Singles (Boys)

First : Chetan Patil Second : Avinash ovhal

Badminton Singles (Girls)

First : Shweta Jakotia Second : Priyanka

Badminton Mixed Doubles

First : Sumit Kelkar & Madhura SatheSecond : Chetan Patil & Mansi Vichare

Table Tennins

First : Swapnil Bhosale Second : Rushit Thakkar


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

Shoot put (Girls)

First : Amruta Sarovkar Second : Saroj Patil

Shot put (Boys)

First : Omkar Thakur Second : Ajit Zankar

Discus throw (Boys)

First : Samadhan Kashid Second : Prathamesh Mhatre

Discus throw (Girls)

First : Saroj Patil Second : Kranti Abhange

Long Jump (Boys)

First : Omkar Thakur Second : Ajit ZankarSecond : Samadhan Kashid

Long Jump (Girls)

First : Shweta Vaity Second : Mansi Vichare

Running (Boys)

First : Ajit Zankar Second : Omkar Thakur

Running (Girls)

First : Kranti Abhange Second : Mansi Vichare

Chess (Boys)

First : Sulesh Karnik Second : Christen GeorgeSecond : Nitin Mhatre

Chess (Girls)

First : Sayli Apte Second : Alka Mane

Full Cricket

First : 3rd year Boys

1. captain : Prathmesh Mhatre 2. Sopan Shingole

3. Sagar Patil 4. Mahesh Tembe

5. Hemant Hadawale 6. Yogesh Bhoir

7. Omkar Thakur 8. Rushit Thakur

9. Sumit Kelkar 10. Pramod Doke

Second : 2nd year boys


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

Kabbadi (Boys)

First : 3rd year Boys

1. Captain: Sagar Patil 2. Prathamesh Mhatre

3. Sopan Shingole 4. Prakash Bangode

5. Hemant Hadawale 6. Yogesh Bhoir

7. Srikrishna Chaudari

Second : 2nd year boys

Intra College CompetitionsFreshers’ Debate

1st Prize- Ranjani Krishnan & Mrs. Swati Baltembe2nd Prize- Vikash Kumar3rd Prize- Devki Nandhan Singh & Mohini SawlaConsolation Prize - Harshwardhan KhambeteUjwala AroteVikas Ambetkar

Freshers’ Moot Court

1st Prize - Devki Nandhan Singh2nd Prize - Reshma Kakade 3rd Prize - Vaishali Patil

Constitution Day Competitions - Elocution

1st Prize - Ranjani Krishnan 2nd Prize - Krishna Kamath 3rd Prize - Preeti Mahajan

‘My Constitution - My Knowledge’ Written Exam

Topper - Santosh Giri, II LLB

Marathi Divas - Elocution

1st Prize - Vaishali Patil 2nd Prize - Anil Suryavanshi 3rd Prize - Ganesh Acharya

Marathi Naipunya Chachani Spardha (Written)

1st Prize - Mohan Nimbalkar 2nd Prize - Santosh Giri 3rd Prize - Vaishali Patil

Hindi Divas - "Extempore Speaking"

1st Prize - Vikash Kumar 2nd Prize - Preeti Mahajan 3rd Prize - Rohit Sharma

English Essay Writing

1st Prize - Ranjani Krishnan 2nd Prize - Shruti S. 3rd Prize - Venkatesh Kadam

Speak-up: Youth Against Sexual Harrasment

1st Prize-Ranjani Krishnan 2nd Prize-Krishna Kamath


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

Sr. N

o.

Nam

e o

f C

om

pet

itio

n

Dat

e

Org

anis

ed b

y

P

lace

P

arti

cip

atio

n

P

rize

1.V

ivek

anan

d E

locu

tion

30th O

ct. 2

012

Viv

ekan

and

Vic

har

Pun

e

N

il

-

Com

petit

ion

- 201

2K

endr

a P

une

2.A

dv. D

. T. J

aibh

ave

Mem

oria

l22

nd &

23rd

N.B

.T. L

aw C

olle

geN

ashi

k

-

-

Sta

te le

vel M

oot-

Tria

l &S

ept.

2012

Nas

hik

Judg

emen

t writ

ting

3.D

. M. H

aris

h - M

emor

ial

15th

Sep

. 201

2G

. J. A

dvan

i Law

Mum

bai

-

-In

ter-

Col

legi

ate

Elo

cutio

nC

olle

ge B

andr

a,co

mpe

titio

n - 2

012

Mum

bai

4.V

ITH S

tate

Lev

el M

oot C

ourt

28th &

30th

Dr.

Am

bedk

ar C

olle

geN

agpu

r

-

-

com

petit

ion

(201

2-13

)S

ep. 2

012

of L

aw N

agpu

r

5.3rd

Dad

a N

ari G

ursa

hani

Law

1st S

ep. 2

012

N. G

. Law

Col

lege

Ulh

asna

gar

Ms.

Vip

lavi

Son

alka

r1s

t Priz

eC

olle

ge, U

lhas

naga

rU

lhas

naga

rM

s. A

mru

ta B

urde

(II L

LB)

(Law

qui

z)

6.1s

t RLC

Ess

ay w

rittin

g &

SM

S31

st A

ug. 2

012

Riz

vi L

aw C

olle

ge,

Mum

bai

Ms.

Ran

jani

Kris

hnan

-w

rittin

g co

mpe

titio

nB

andr

a,M

umba

i

7.C

lient

Cou

nsel

ing

com

petit

ion

6th O

ct. 2

012

K. C

. Law

Col

lege

,M

umba

i

-

-M

umba

i

8.V

IIIT

H D

. M. H

aris

h N

atio

nal

30th N

ov. 2

012

K. C

. Law

Col

lege

,M

umba

i

-

-

Ess

ay w

rittin

g co

mpe

titio

nM

umba

i

9.K

ai. M

runa

l Heg

shet

e M

emor

ial

18th

Aug

. 201

2N

avni

rman

col

lege

Rat

nagi

ri

-

-S

tate

leve

l int

er c

olle

giat

eof

Art

s, C

omm

erce

Elo

utio

n co

mpe

titio

n&

Sci

ence

,Rat

nagi

ri

10.

VI-

Inte

r Col

lege

Moo

t Cou

rt6th

Oct

. 201

2D

r. D

y. P

atil

Col

lege

Nav

i Mum

bai

1.D

evki

nand

an S

ingh

-I LL

B B

est R

esea

rche

rC

ompe

titio

n o

f Law

2.S

neha

l Kum

ar G

aikw

ad-I

I LLB

Roh

it S

harm

a3.

Roh

it S

harm

a-I L

LB

11.

AN

UR

AA

G -

2013

15th F

eb 2

013

New

Law

Col

lege

Mum

bai

Ms.

Mad

hura

Des

hpan

de-I

LLB

-S

ingi

ng C

ompe

titio

n

Inte

r Co

llegi

ate

Com

pet

itio

ns

20

12

-13


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

12.

Law

Try

st -

2013

23rd, 2

4thJ.

C. C

olle

ge o

f Law

Mum

bai

-

-

Feb

201

3

13.

^maV

r` _

amR>r A

ä`mg

18,

19H$m

. g. d

mUr _

amR>r à

JVYwi

o

-

-

n[af

XoMo 2

4 do

A{Y

doeZ

OmZo.

201

3A

Ü``Z

g§ñW

m Ywi

o

14.

Jt. P

. B. G

ajen

dra

Gad

kar

23rd F

eb 2

013

Ism

ails

aheb

Mul

laS

atar

a

-

-

Mem

oria

l Sta

te le

vel

Law

Col

lege

, Sat

ara

Moo

t Cou

rt C

ompe

titio

n

15.

XIII

Nat

iona

l Moo

t Cou

rt23

rd, 2

4thM

. P. L

aw C

olle

geA

uran

gaba

d

-

-

Com

petit

ion

- 201

3F

eb 2

013

Aur

anga

bad

16.

III N

atio

nal P

ower

Poi

nt22

nd F

eb 2

013

M. P

. Law

Col

lege

Aur

anga

bad

-

-

Pre

sent

atio

n C

onte

st-2

013

17.

Lokm

anya

Tila

k N

atio

nal

1st, 2

nd F

eb 2

013

D.E

.S. L

awP

une

-

-

App

ella

te M

oot c

ourt

Col

lege

, Pun

eC

ompe

titio

n

18.

Mus

haira

Com

petit

ion-

2013

30th, 3

1st J

an &

GA

AZ

Inst

iture

Than

e

-

-1st

Feb

201

3M

umbr

a, T

hane

19.

Judg

emen

t writ

ting

31st J

an 2

012

Dr.

Pad

msi

ngh

Pat

ilP

une

-

-

Com

petit

ion

Pra

tisht

han

20.

7th N

atio

nal A

nnua

l IIP

S23

rd, 2

4thS

VK

M'S

NM

IMS

Mum

bai

-

-

IP M

oot C

ourt

Com

petit

ion

Feb

201

3M

umba

i

21.

H$moH$U

{d^m

Jr`

Am§V

a-16

OmZ

o 201

3gm

d©. J

UoemoËg

d Q´>ñ

Q>,amoh

m

-

-

_hm{d

Úmb`

rZ d

ŠV¥Ëd

ñnYm

©amoh

m

22.

5th S

tate

leve

l Elo

cutio

n19

th J

an 2

013

MM

M'S

Sha

nkar

rao

Pun

e

-

-

Com

petit

ion

- 201

3C

hava

n La

w C

olle

geP

une


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

23.

Iuve

num

Fes

t19

th J

an 2

013

PE

S L

aw C

olle

geD

adar

-

-

Dad

arM

umba

i

24.

Pre

lude

-Inte

r Col

legi

ate

24th J

an 2

013

SV

KM

'S P

ravi

nV

ile P

arle

-

-

Com

petit

ion

Gan

dhi L

awM

umba

iC

olle

ge, M

umba

i

25.

Inte

r-C

olle

giat

e C

lient

31st J

an 2

013

K. C

. Law

Col

lege

Mum

bai

Mr.

Sau

gat H

azar

a - I

II LL

B

-

Cou

nsel

ling

Com

petit

ion

Mum

bai

Ms.

Alis

ha B

urde

- II

LLB

26.

The

Inte

r Col

lege

Moo

t9th

Feb

201

3S

t. W

ilfre

d's

Pan

vel

Ms.

Vip

lavi

Son

alka

r - II

LLB

-C

ourt

Com

petit

ion

Col

lege

of L

awM

s. A

lisha

Bur

de -

II LL

B

27.

Res

earc

h O

dyss

ey o

n9th

Feb

201

3N

. G. L

aw C

olle

geU

lhas

naga

r

-

-Li

ve in

Rel

atio

nsU

lhas

naga

r

28.

Dr.

Ann

asah

eb B

enda

le9th

, 10

thK

CE

SS

S.S

.Man

ivar

Jalg

aon

-

-

Mem

oria

l 8 N

atio

nal M

oot

Feb

201

3La

w C

olle

ge, J

alga

onC

ourt

Com

petit

ion

2013

29.

Inte

r Col

legi

ate

Sta

te L

evel

4th , 5th

New

Law

Col

lege

Ahm

edna

gar

-

-

Elo

cutio

n C

ompe

titio

n 20

13F

eb 2

013

Ahm

edna

gar

30.

Vid

hi K

iran

2013

8th , 10

thG

. J. A

dvan

i Law

Mum

bai

-

-

(Par

liam

enta

ry d

ebat

eF

eb 2

013

Col

lege

Moo

t Cou

rt, E

locu

tion)

31.

S>m°. ~

m~mg

mho~

Am§~

oS>H$a

Am§V

a10

OmZ

o 201

3S>m

°. ~m~

mgmh

o~ A

m§~oS>H

$aam`

JS>

-

-

_hm{d

Úmb`

rZ am

Á`ñV

ar`H$b

m, {d

kmZ,

dm{U

Á`dŠ

V¥Ëd

ñnYm

© - 2

013

_hm{d

Úmb`

, am`

JS>

32.

Abh

ay- 2

013

Inte

r9th

Mar

ch 2

013

A.S

.K's

Raj

arsh

iM

umba

i

-

-C

olle

giat

e C

ompe

titio

nS

hahu

Col

lege

of

Law

, Vik

hrol

i

33.

NLS

IU-H

.M.S

eerv

ai G

old

Nat

iona

l Law

Sch

ool

Ban

galo

re

-

-M

edal

Ess

ay C

ompe

titio

nof

Indi

a U

nive

rsity

in C

onst

itutio

nal L

aw 2

013

Ban

galo

re.


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

Seminars & Conferences (2012-13)

Date Seminar Organiser Paper Presentation Participation

13th Sept.2012 &1st Oct.2012

National Seminar onConsumerProctevtion & welfarein Global Economysevtor - 2012

Akola Law College,Akola

ConsumerProtection Models& ConsumerProtection Act, 1986

Mrs. Srividhya Jayakumar

Dec - Jan2013

7 Days Workshopon ResearchMethodology

Dept. of LawUniversity of Pune

- Mr. Mithun Bansode

4th May2013

Justice P. B.GajendragadkarEndowment lectureby Justice AltamasKabir (CTI) on Roleof Directive Principlesin Social Transformation

Dept. of LawUniversity ofMumbai

- Mr. Mithun BansodeMrs. Ranjan JoshiMrs. Sunitha K. K.and Students

30th

MarchJustice M. C. Chaglalecture by JusticeMarkandeya Katju(SCI) on Ancient& ModermJurisprudence


- Mr. Mithun Bansode &Students

8th

MarchSeminar Consultationon Anti-rape Laws


- Mrs. Srividhya Jayakumar

23rd Feb.2013

National Seminar onElectoral Reforms:Issues & Challenges

New Law CollegePune

Electoral Reforms inthe Domain ofCriminalisation

Mr. Mithun Bansode

5th Jan.2013

Seminar onPrevention of risingcrime in Indiansociety & PreventiveDetention Laws

Bombay CouncilofAcademicians &Professionals.

- Four Students

15th Dec.2012

Problem of Jammu& Kashmir

VPM's JoshiBedekar College,Thane

- Mrs. Srividhya JayakumarMr. Mithun Bansode

13th Sept.2012

Seminar on JudicialReforms

Law Dept. Universityof Mumbai.

- Mrs. Srividhya Jayakumar

"Shiksha Evam Vidya(Education andKnowledge)

8th Sept.2012

Divine India YouthAssociation -

Mrs. Srividhya Jayakumar


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

Preparatory ExamsTime Table, I Term : November 2012 (Timing - 6.00 pm to 9.00 pm)

DATE FIRST LL.B. SECOND LL.B. THIRD LL.B.

05.11.2012 Labour Law Ad. Law C.P.C.

06.11.2012 Contract – I Family II Cr. P.C.

07.11.2012 Law of Torts Property Law IOS

08.11.2012 LL.& LW Co. Law PIL & HR

Time Table, II Term : April 2013 (Timing - 6.00 pm to 9.00 pm)

DATE FIRST LL.B. SECOND LL.B THIRD LL.B.

01-04-2013 Crimes Contract II ACADR

02-04-2013 Constitution Land Laws Evidence

03-04-2013 Environment Jurisprudence Banking / Law &Medicine

04-04-2013 Family - I Criminology IPR / Insurance

Practical Training – 2012-2013I LL.B. (Paper I)

Students were given the programme sheet for the year at the time of Admission.The following Spcial Lectures were arranged :-

Date Teacher Incharge Topic Details(Division wise)

1. 18th Jan, Ms. Manisha Wagh - A Bar Council of India / 21st Jan, Ms. Hetal Meisheri - B,E State Bar Council - 22nd Jan 2013 Mr. Mithun Bansode - 'C' Powers Functions, Duties

Mrs. Dikshita Gupte - D

2. 22nd Jan, Ms. Manisha Wagh - A Contempt of Court 23rd Jan, Ms. Hetal Meisheri - B 29th Jan 2013 Mr. Mithun Bansode - C

Mrs. Dikshita Gupte - DMs. Hetal Meisheri - E

Panel Discussion

As part of Practical Training Programme for students a "Panel Discussion" wasorganised as follows :


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

Date Panel Members

6th Feb 2013 Prof. Paranjape - Duty towards courtProf. Payak - Duty towards clientProf. Jalisatgi - Right to Practice.

Time - 5.45 to 8.30 p.m.

These special programmes were in addition to regular classes on Mondays &Tuesdays during 4.3o to 5.30 p.m.

Project :- The students were required to

1. Prepare a report on their visit to Court.

2. Draft - a) Consumer Complaint. b) Notice to tenant by owner.

3. Prepare Notes on following :- a) Right to information Act, 2005 b) Right to Education Act, 2010 C) Original Judgement of Mumbai High court or Supreme Court of India.

Assignment of Marks & Examination

Project : 30 Marks, Written Exam. - 70 Marks

Date of Exam - 1st March 2013 - 11 am to 1.30 pm.

Viva During - 1st Feb to 28th Feb 2013 Time: 4.30 to 5.30 pm.

Re examination was also held for failing students on 23 rd March and 5th April2013.

Students were supplied with study material & list of references. A small booklet onAdvocates Act. was prepared in Marathi by teachers & they were also distributed to thestudents.

- Report by Professor Incharge Mr. Mithun Bansode

II LL.B. (Paper II)

As a part of syllabus, practical taining is a compulsory subject for II LLB. In the begginingof the year Students were given programme & project of the practical training.

Lectures on various topics were conducted in both III & IV semester on everyWednesday & Thrusday during 4.30 To 5.30.

All the topics, such as Lok adalat, para-legal training, Legal and Client interview-ing and counselling, negotiation, use of computer, PIL research & case comment werelectured by the practical in-charge Prof. Vinod H. Wagh.

Students were asked to draft are PIL on any issue. They were also asked to bring acase of High Court or supreme court & comment on it. Twice the students have pub-lished their articles & verious updates, news of law in wallpaper & made it open for allstudents in liberary.


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

The Students, as a pool of practical training project exercise visited Lok Adalat atThane & different court such as High court Thane District court and other courts.

The viva or the students were taken during 1st January to 31st January 2013 writtenexam was held on 1st March 2013.

Project : The students were required to draft

1. Application for seeking parote

2. Application for conversion or Agricultural land into NA.

3. Agreement or sale

4. Adoption deed.

5. Report on Lok Adalat visit.

6. Report on police station visit.

Assessment :

Project : 30 MarksWritten Exam : 70 MarksStudents were supplied with study material (English/Marathi) complied by our teachers.

Examinations

The writen examination was conducted on 1st March'13 - 2.30 - 5 pm and results weredeclared on 20th March 2013. Re-examinations for failing students were conducted on23rd and 5th April 2013.

- Report by Professor Incharge Mr. Vinod Wagh

III LL.B.

There are two papers of practical training for the III year LLB (Final year) student aspresribed by the Bar Council of India.

Paper III Drafting of Conveyances & Pleadings (100 marks)

Paper IV Moot Court, Court visits etc. (100 marks)

Total No. M F Total Ex-Studentsof students 115 131 246 07

Batches Notification

At the time of admission into III year, the students were given notice in writing aboutthe practical training requirements in the various components. The students were pro-vided with file & papers for submission of their reports. The students were put intobatches with a teacher incharge. They were to report to the same tacher for every com-ponent. Close monitoring & guidance was thus facilitated. The following were thebatches :


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

Division Roll Teacher Division Roll Teacher No. No.

A 1-40 Mrs. Srividhya Jayakumar A 40-60 Mr. Vinod WaghB 1-20

B 21-40 Mr. Payak B 41-60 Mr. Paranjape& ex-students

C 1-20 Ms. Hetal Meisheri C 21-40 Ms. Manisha M. Wagh

C 41-60 Mr. Ambar Joshi D 1-20 Mr. Manoj Bhatt

D 21-40 Mr. Badri Ganesh D 41-66 Ms. Vidya Gaikwad

Regular and Special lectures

For practical training there were regular lectures from August during the first period4.30 - 5.30 p.m. on Mondays and Tuesdays Guidance in the drafting assignments,court visits, advocates office visit and moot courts were given during these periods.Special emphasis on daily cause lists of courts,hirearchy of courts, trial proceedingincluding examination of witnesses was given. Drafting of not only pleadings &conveyances but also drafting of affidavits in lieu of examination in chief, submissionof statement of list of witnesses etc., was done. Students were shown, FIR, notices,affidavits and complaints so that they familiarise with the basic knowledge.

These regular lecture periods were utilized to also teach about arguments in courtsthrough moot court exercises. Students were trained to appreciate the factual matrix ofcase, framing issues and research for the moot courts.

Special Lectures - The following special lectures were organized invitingexperienced members of the bar in addition to the regular faculty members -

Date Timing Topic Resource Persons

17 Dec 6-9 Conveyances Mr. Payak S. M.

Mr. Paranjpe S. G.

Mr. Amber Joshi

Mr. Ganesh Badri

18, 19 Dec. 6-9 Criminal Pleading Mr. Amber Joshi

Mr. Manoj Bhatt

Mr. Bharat Khanna

Mrs. Glady Pereing

20, 21 Dec. 6-9 Writs Mr. Amber Joshi

Mr. Ganesh Sovani

Mr. Manoj Bhatt

Mr. Bharat Khanna


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

2 Jan. 6-9 Criminal Pleadings Mr. Payak S. M.

Mr. Paranjpe S. G.

Mr. Amber Joshi

Mr. Bharat Khanna

3 Jan. 6-9 Matrimonial Pleadings Mr. Amber Joshi

Mrs. Sumitha Kaprekar

Mr. Bharat Khanna

5 Jan 6-9 Appeal, Review, Mr. F. N. Kazi

Revision Mr. Manoj Bhatt

Exams and Re-exams

01.03.13 6-9 pm Written examination (45 marks) also.File submission of drafting exercises (45 marks)

07.01.13 5.30-9 pm Moot Court Exam I (10 marks)

04.03.13 “ “ II (10 marks)

05.03.13 “ “ III (10 marks)

06.03.13 5.30-9 pm Viva ( 20 marks : 10+10) and

Report on Court Visit ( 30 marks) and

Report on Advocates Office Visit ( 30 marks)

Students had been advised to visit courts & observe trial proceedings - both civil &criminal. Throughout the year visits were going on in batches in various courts in Thane,Mumbai, Kalyan, Bhiwandi & Nashik. Students were advised to visit Advocates Officesand also to do internship with advocates.

Black & white formal dressing was made compulsory for moot court exams and courtvisits. A model moot court presentation was arranged. The following students argued -

Mr. Jayesh Gokhaleand

Ms. Rupali AkolkarMr. Bharat Parwani Ms. Harshala

Results were declared on 20th March 2013. Re-exams were conducted for the failingstudents on 23rd, 25th and 26th March 2013 and results were declared on 28th March2013. On 25th, special coaching in moot courts was given to students who failed in mootcourts. A second re-exam was conducted on 5th and 6th April 2013 & results declared on8th April 2013.

- Report by Professor Incharge Mrs. Srividhya Jayakumar

} }


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

Library Report 2012-2013“A capacity and taste for reading gives access to whatever has already been

discovered by others.”

- Abraham Lincoln A library is a treasure-house of knowledge. A well-stocked library is an asset to the

college. Keeping this in a mind we keep adding books to our Library collection. Detailsof Library collection as follows:

COLLECTION:

Prior Books Journals Bound Volumes CD

22766 24 2816 39

Additions 198 2 113 02

Total 22964 26 2929 41

This year we have started subscribing two new journals ‘Law Profile and IndianBar Review. Indian Bar Review (back Volumes) since 1983 is now made available inthe Library.

BOOK BANK SERVICE:

No. of Sets available No. of students used the facility

F.Y.LLB 30 18

S.Y.LLB 30 07

T.Y.LLB 30 08

USERS:

All the students and staff of the college are entitled to be a member of the Libraryapart from that we also offer membership to outsiders. Till date we have total 97 outsidersas our members.

ADDITIONAL LIBRARY CARD:

The top ten students of our college in University Exams are provided with additionalLibrary card.

BOOKS DONATION:

Mrs. Sanjeevani Jadhav, wife of late Honourable Judge Shri.S.K.Jadhav, donatedhis collection of 93 Reference books with some bare acts and Journal issues to ourLibrary. Our thankful acknowledgement to Mrs.Sanjeevani Jadhav.

- Ms. Sheetal Autade Librarian


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

Dat

eM

OR

NIN

G S

ES

SIO

NE

VE

NIN

G S

ES

SIO

NM

OR

NIN

G S

ES

SIO

ND

ate

10.3

0 TO

1.3

02.

30 T

O 5

.30

10.3

0 TO

1.3

0

SE

M –

IS

EM

– I

IS

EM

–II

IS

EM

– I

VS

EM

– V

SE

M-

VI

27/1

1/20

12-

Crim

es-

Juris

prud

ence

-AC

ADR

27/1

1/20

12

29/1

1/20

12La

bour

Law

--

--

-29

/11/

2012

30/1

1/20

12-

-Ad

min

istra

tive

Law

-C

.P.C

.-

30/1

1/20

12

1/12

/201

2-

Cons

titut

iona

l Law

-C

ontra

ct –

II-

Evid

ence

1/12

/201

2

3/12

/201

2C

ontra

ct -

I-

Fam

ily -

II-

Cr.P

.C.

-3/

12/2

012

4/12

/201

2-

Fam

ily-I

-La

nd L

aw-

Bank

ing &

Neg

o. In

st. A

ct4/

12/2

012

5/12

/201

2To

rts-

Prop

erty

Law

-In

terp

reta

tion

of S

tatu

tes

-5/

12/2

012

7/12

/201

2-

Envi

ronm

enta

l Law

-Cr

imin

olog

y/Ta

xatio

n/Ba

nkru

ptcy

-In

sura

nce

7/12

/201

2

8/12

/201

2Le

gal L

angu

age

-C

ompa

ny L

aw-

Publ

ic In

t. La

w &

H. R

.8/

12/2

012

10/1

2/20

12-

--

--

Inte

llect

ual P

rope

rty L

aw10

/12/

2012

11/1

2/20

12-

--

--

Wom

en C

hild

ren

& La

w11

/12/

2012

12/1

2/20

12-

--

--

Law

and

Med

icin

e12

/12/

2012

13/1

2/20

12-

--

--

Con

flict o

f Law

13/1

2/20

12

Un

iver

sity

Exa

min

atio

n a

t Ou

r Ce

ntr

eT

ime

Tab

le o

f Nov

. / D

ec.

20

12

Law

Exa

min

atio

n


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

Dat

eM

OR

NIN

G S

ES

SIO

NE

VE

NIN

G S

ES

SIO

NM

OR

NIN

G S

ES

SIO

N

11.0

0 TO

2.0

03.

00 T

O 6

.00

11.0

0 TO

2.0

0

SE

M –

IS

EM

– I

IS

EM

–II

IS

EM

– I

VS

EM

– V

SE

M-

VI

10/4

/201

3La

bour

Law

-Ad

min

istra

tive

Law

-C

.P.C

.-

10/4

/201

3

12/4

/201

3C

ontra

ct -

I-

Fam

ily L

aw II

-C

r.P.C

.-

12/4

/201

3

15/4

/201

3To

rts-

Tran

sfer

of P

rope

rty-

Inte

rpre

tatio

n of

Sta

tute

s-

15/4

/201

3

17/4

/201

3Le

gal L

angu

age

-C

ompa

ny L

aw-

Publ

ic In

t. La

w &

H. R

.-

17/4

/201

3

22/4

/201

3-

Crim

es-

Juris

prud

ence

-AC

ADR

22/4

/201

3

26/4

/201

3-

Fam

ily-I

-La

nd L

aw-

Bank

ing &

Neg

o. In

st. A

ct26

/4/2

013

29/4

/201

3-

Envi

ronm

enta

l Law

-Cr

imin

olog

y/Ta

xatio

n/Ba

nkru

ptcy

-In

sura

nce

29/4

/201

3

2/5/

2013

-C

onst

itutio

nal

--

-In

telle

ctua

l Pro

perty

Law

2/5/

2013

3/5/

2013

--

--

-W

omen

Chi

ldre

n &

Law

3/5/

2013

4/5/

2013

--

--

-La

w a

nd M

edic

ine

4/5/

2013

6/5/

2013

--

--

-C

onflic

t of L

aw6/

5/20

13

7/5/

2013

--

-C

ontra

t - II

--

7/5/

2013

8/5/

2013

--

--

-Ev

iden

ce8/

5/20

13

Tim

e T

able

of A

pri

l / M

ay, 2

01

3 L

aw E

xam

inat

ion

DAT

E


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

In Communist Party of India v BharathKumar, the Supreme Court had held wayback in 1997 that there cannot be any rightto call or enforce a “Bandh” whichinterferes with the fundamental freedomsof other citizens apart from causingnational loss. Thus a “Bandh” whethercalled expressly or impliedly is illegal !That is the law of the land. Surprisingly,two girls recently discovered thatprotesting a bandh is also “illegal”.

The police officers under politicalpressure were clueless and probablyturned to God for assistance and Eureka!The girl’s name happened to beShaheen Dhadha – so section 295A wasapplied as “religious feelings” may havebeen hurt. And yes the comments wereposted on Internet, so naturally the IT Actwas applied as well.

If Shaheen Dhadha can be arrestedfor hurting “religious feelings”, then bythis bizarre and irrational logic, I JayeshGokhale cannot even have an argumentwith my good friends Zafeer Alam andJoe D’Souza.

S.295-A. read as follows : Deliberateand malicious acts intended to outragereligious feelings of any class by insultingits religion or religious beliefs. – Whoever,with deliberate and malicious intentionof outraging the religious feelings of ayclass of [citizens of India], [by words,either spoken or written, or by signs orby visible representations or otherwise],insults or attempts to insult the religionor the religious beliefs of that class, shallbe punished with imprisonment of eitherdescription for a term which may extendto [three years], or with fine, or with both.

Recent Controversy about the Police Handling ofCyber Law Offences

Mr. Jayesh Gopal Gokhale III LLB Student

Later 295A was replaced with 505(2)for creating or promoting hatred, ill-willor enmity between classes.

S.505. reads : Statementsconducing to public mischief [(1)Whoever makes, publishes or circulatesany statement, rumour or report, -

(a) with intent to cause, or which is likelyto cause, any officer, soldier, [sailoror airman] in the Army, [Navy or AirForce] [of India] to mutiny orotherwise disregard or fail in his dutyas such]; or

(b) with intent to cause, or which is likelyto cause, fear or alarm to the public, orto any section or the public wherebyany person may b induced to commitan offence against the State or againstthe public tranquility; or

(c) with intent to incite, or which is likelyto incite, any class or community ofpersons to commit any offenceagainst any other class or community,shall be punished with imprisonmentwhich may extend to [three years], orwith fine, or with both.

(2) Statements creating or promotingenmity, hatred or ill-will between classes.– Whoever makes, publishes or circulatesany statement or report containing rumouror alarming news with intent to create orpromote, or which is likely to create orpromote, on grounds of religion, race,place of birth, residence, language, casteor community or any other groundwhatsoever, feelings of enmity, hatred orill-will between different religious, racial,language or regional groups or castes orcommunities, shall be punished with


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

imprisonment which may extend to threeyears, or with fine, or with both.

(3) Offence under sub-section(2)committed in place of worship, etc. –Whoever commits an offence specifiedin sub-section (2) in any place of worshipor in any assembly engaged in theperformance of religious worship orreligious ceremonies, shall be punishedwith imprisonment which may extend tofive years and shall also be liable to fine.]

Exception. – It does not amount toan offence, within the meaning of thissection, when the person making,publishing or circulating any suchstatement, rumour or report, hasreasonable grounds for believing thatsuch statement, rumour or report is trueand makes, publishes or circulates it [ingood faith and] without any such intentas aforeside.]

This section is equally irrelevant asnobody has been able to point out thetwo classes involved.

Applying the IT Act every now andthen seems to have become anobsession with our police. As perstatistics of National Crime RecordsBureau, in 2011 alone 1,791 cases havebeen registered under the IT Act. But, ifwe look at convictions, the number is ashocking 7! Need I say more?

Let us also analyze Section 66A ofthe IT Act which has been applied.S.66A. Punishment for sending offensivemessages through communicationservice, etc..- Any person who sends, bymeans of a computer resource or acommunication device, -

(a) Any information that is grosslyoffensive or has menacingcharacter; or

(b) any information which he knows tobe false, but for the purpose of

causing annoyance, inconvenience,danger, obstruction, insult, injury,criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred,or ill will, persistently makes bymaking use of such computerresource or a communication device.

(c) any electronic mail or electronic mailmessage for the purpose of causingannoyance or inconvenience or todeceive or to mislead the addresseeor recipient about the origin of suchmessages.

shall be punishable withimprisonment for a term which mayextend to three years and with fine.

Explanation: For the purposes of thissection, terms “Electronic mail” and“Electronic Mail Message” means amessage or information created ortransmitted or received on a computer,computer system, computer resource orcommunication device includingattachments in text, image, audio, videoand any other electronic record, whichmay be transmitted with the message.

Sub Clause (a) concerns anyinformation that is grossly offensive orhas menacing character. Protesting ashutdown should ideally neither offendnor threaten anyone. So to a mindpossessing common sense, sub clausea should not apply. Sub clause (b) doesnot apply since information is true. SubClause (c) applies in case of annoyance,inconvenience, deception or in case it ismisleading. Now as far as deception andmisleading are concerned they do notapply in the present case and as far asannoyance and inconvenience isconcerned it is in fact the girls and publicat large who were annoyed andinconvenienced by the overall shutdownin the city.

The actions of the police authoritiesare also a blatant violation of section 46(4)


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

of Criminal Procedure Code whichprovides that no woman shall be arrestedafter sunset and before sunrise.

Section 46(4). CrPC reads as under –

46. Arrest how made. –

(1) In making an arrest the police officeror other person making the sameshall actually touch or confine thebody of the person to be arrested,unless there be a submission to thecustody by word or action.

(2) If such person forcibly resists theendeavour to arrest him, or attemptsto evade the arrest, such policeofficer or other person may use allmeans necessary to effect the arrest.

(3) Nothing in this section gives a rightto cause the death of a person whois not accused of an offencepunishable with death or withimprisonment for life.

(4) Save in exceptional circumstances,no woman shall be arrested aftersunset and before sunrise, andwhere such exceptionalcircumstances exist, the womanpolice officer shall, be making awritten report, obtain the priorpermission of the Judicial Magistrateof the first class within whose localjurisdiction the offence is committedor the arrest is to be made.

The arrest of the friend ReenuSrinivasan is amusing to say the leastand irritating and frustrating to say it more.There can be a thousand interpretationsthat can be applied to the act of liking afacebook post. It may range very widelyfrom – “Hey it’s a nice joke” to “I agreewith your opinion” to “I completelyendorse your point of view and amwilling to die for your cause”. How canthe police decide the degree ofsynchronization of the minds of the two

girls on the issue by just a single click onthe like button?

The Government has to realize thateveryone cannot be Mahatma Gandhi orAnna Hazare and protest in their fashion.The Internet is the only medium availableto the common man to vent his angeragainst the establishment as other mediaare out of his reach. Naturally when hegets the medium he may tend to gooverboard. Hence as such the lawsshould be more lenient when it comes tofreedom of speech and expression whichhas been guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a)of Constitution of India, even if the casemay fall outside the sphere of those rights.Article 19(2) enables the state to imposereasonable restrictions on the grounds of

a) Sovereignty and integrity of Indiab) Security of the Statec) “Friendly relations with foreign statesd) Public Ordere) Decency or moralityf) Contempt of courtg) Defamation andh) Incitement to an offence

Having said that, the youth of todayalso needs to realize that the Internet isnot a microphone attached with immunityto say absolutely anything. All rules ofsocial behavior apply to comments on theInternet as well and one must use a certaindegree of common sense before postingany material. One thumb rule that may befollowed is that only such comments maybe posted which the person has courageto say it in front of 10 people. And henceeven the laws must distinguish betweenidentified comments and anonymouscomments.

Democracy implies ideologicaltolerance – While you may not agree toeverything what I might have to say, butplease respect my right to say it.


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

Free and Fair Election is a mandategiven by our Constitution for aParliamentary Democracy. The word‘Democracy’ coined in the preamble canbe realized if we have the conduct offree, fair and effective election processin our system. Only free and fair electionsto the various legislative bodies in thecountry can guarantee the growth of ademocratic polity1

In India, election is always a giganticexercise because the country is thebiggest democracy in the world; millionsof electorates go to polls to electmembers for House of People, StateLegislative bodies and Legislatures ofthe Union Territories. In Kihoto Hollohan2

Court emphasized that, democracy is abasic feature of the Constitution andelection conducted at regular prescribedintervals is essential to the democraticsystem envisaged in the Constitution. Soit is current requirement and need toprotect and sustain the purity of electoralprocess. For that it would be better toassess the electoral process itslegislation and issues and challenges forits reforms. Several Committees likeGoswami committee, GuptaCommittee, Vohra Committee, Lawcommission of India- 1999, ElectionCommission of India-2004 verified theissue of electoral reform. They suggestedthe solution for the same, but still somevacuum has been left under the gamutof Constitutional mandate of election and

Electoral Reforms:Issues and Challenges in the domain of Criminalization

By Asst. Prof. Mr. Mithun Bansode

under the other statutes likeRepresentation of Peoples Act.

Electoral Reforms and Criminalization :

This becomes dire need to analyzethe process of election to protect thedemocracy. This paper tries to reveal theissues and challenges in election reformsin India in relation with Criminalization ofpolitics. This issue is very basic it needsto be corrected at the earliest so that tosome extent we can save not only systemof election but also the democracy frombeing criminalized.

During the period of election it hasbecome very often to read the news that,’Particular candidate contesting electionhas 200 criminal cases against him. AnMLA is now contesting as anindependent while he is still serving a lifeterm in jail. He was convicted in akidnapping case but an appeal has beenentered in the High Court this kind of storyhas now become very familiar to citizens.’It is shameful for the world’s biggestdemocracy that these criminals who havemany cases of Murder, rape and decoitythey are sitting in a forum of law makingi.e. parliament and state legislatures.According to CBI report to the VohraCommittee, “all over India crimesyndicates have become a law untothemselves, even in the smaller townsand ruler areas muscle man becomes theorder of the day.” And the reflection of thiscan be found not only in election to House

1M.P.Jain, Indian Constitutional Law, Butterworths and Wadhawa, Reprint 2012, p.8722AIR 1993 SC 1535


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

of people or State Legislature but evenin at the ground level of corporationelections.3 The nexus between thecriminal gangs, police, bureaucracy andpoliticians has come out clearly in variousparts of the country4. To curb this elementof criminalization law proves to be veryshort.

Legal Mandate for De-CriminalizationUnder Section 8 of RPA,1951:

Existing Legal provision provided inSection -8 of the Representation of thePeoples Act, 19515, which providesdisqualification on conviction for certainoffences.

1. Sub-section (1) of section 8 providesdisqualification for a person who hadcommitted and convicted for the

offences mentioned in this section forsix years from the date ofconviction.

2. Sub-section (2) offences mentionedin this subsection if attracted thesentence of imprisonment for notless than six months, then personshall be disqualified from the dateof such conviction and shallcontinue to be disqualified for afurther period of six years since hisrelease.

3. Sub-section (3) provides offencesother than specified in subsection (1)and (2), for which sentence is morethan two years, person convicted forsuch offence shall be disqualifiedfrom the date of conviction and shall

3Sakal Times – Tuesday , Feb.21,2012 After Pune Municipal Corporation election in sutatwadi, Supporter ofindependent Candidate attacked on the supporter of NCP candidate who wins the seat from pashan.4National Commission To Review The Working of the Constitution, Review of Election Law, Processes and ReformOptions, 20015Disqualification on conviction for certain offences – (1) A person convicted of an offence punishable under – (a)Section 153_A ( offence of promoting enmity between different groups on ground of religion, race, place of birth,residence, language etc; and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony) or section 171-E (offence ofbribery) or Section 171-F (Offence of Undue influence or personation at the election) or sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of Section 376 or Section 376-A or Section 376-B or Section 376-C or Section 376-D(offences relatingto rape) or section 198-A (offence of cruelty towards a woman by husband or relative of a husband) or Sub-section(2) or Sub-section (3) of section 505 ( offence of making statement creating or promoting enmity, hatred or ill -willbetween classes or offence relating to such statement in any place of worship or in any assembly engaged in theperformance of religious worship or religious ceremonies) of the Indian Penal Code or(b) the protection of civil rights Act, 1955 which provides punishment for the preaching and practice of untouchabilityand for the enforcement of any disability arising there from or(c) Section 11 (offences of importing or exporting prohibited goods) of the Customs Act,1962 or,(d) Sections 10 to 12 (offence of being a member of an association declared unlawful, offence relating to dealingwith funds of an unlawful association or offence relating to contravention of an order made in respect of a notifiedplace) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967(e) the Foreign Exchange (Regulation) Act, 1973 or(f) the Narcotic Drugs and psychotropic Substances Act,1985 or(g) Section 3 and section 4 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (prevention) Act, 1987or(h) Section 7 of the Religious Institutions (Prevention of Misuse )Act ,1988 or(i) Section 25(offence of promoting enmity between classes in connection with the election) or Section 135 (offenceof removal of ballot -papers from polling stations) or section 135-A(offence of booth capturing) or clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 136 (offence of fraudulently defacing or fraudulently destroying any nomination paper) of thisAct, or(j) Section 6 (offence of conversion of a place of worship) of the places of worship (special provisions) Act,1991 or(k) Section 2 (offence of insulting the Indian National Flag or the Constitution of India or section 3 ( offence ofpreventing singing of national anthem) of the prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 or(l) the Commission of Sati (prevention) Act,1987,or(m) the prevention of corruption Act, 1988 or(n) the prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002Section 8 (2) – A person convicted for the contravention of – (a) prevention of hoarding or profiteering or (b) any lawrelating to the adulteration of food or drugs, or (c) any provisions of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

be continue to be disqualified forfurther period of six years since hisrelease.

4. Sub-section 4 provides thatdisqualification take into effect incase of member of parliament orstate legislature until 3 monthselapsed from date of conviction or ifwithin that period an appeal orapplication for revision is brought inrespect of the conviction or thesentence, until that appeal orapplication is disposed of by thecourt.

Issues and Suggested Reform UnderSection 8:

This provision needs to be amendedat the earliest. Offences mentionedin Sub-section (1) of Section 8 exceptthe offence of rape, providespunishment of less than three yearsin Indian Penal Code. And proposedcandidates they are directlycommitting offences like extortion,kidnapping, murder whether theyentitled to hold position ingovernment? In 1950 politicianswere considered as pioneers ofgood governance. That was themoral content of that society. So thelegislature of that time not even thinkthat in future politics will becriminalized with this motion, thiscould be the reason of insertion ofspecific offences in Section 8(1).

Disqualification of candidate should beattracted for every offence committedby the candidate, or otherwise to fulfillthe objectives of the section 8 of theRPA, 1951 the punishment provided inrelated statues (e.g. Indian Penal Code)mentioned in section 8 should beenhanced.

In this section there is need to includeother grave offences of person,property and election etc withenhanced punishment. For that inthis Representation of Peoples Actone Schedule should be providedfor enhanced punishment for theoffences referred in section 8 of RPAon the ground of public interest todisqualify the proposed candidatefor election or member of statelegislature or parliament.

The Election Commission of 20046

proposed on this issue that,disqualification for criminal offencesis provided for in section 8 of theRPA,1951 a person is disqualifiedfrom contesting election only on theconviction by the court of law. Itmeans this provision sets in motionafter the decision of court. There havebeen several instances of personscharged with serious and heinouscrimes like murder, rape, dacoity etc.As a result in mean time during evenpending trial person contested andelected with majority. But this leadsto undesirable and unethicalsituation. That a person who is lawbreaker becomes the law maker.

For that the commission proposedthat the law should be amended toprovide that any person who isaccused of an offence punishable byimprisonment for five years or moreshould be disqualified fromcontesting election even when thetrial is pending in which chargeshave been framed against him by acompetent court. But this bar on acandidate might be used against theinnocent persons for that there isneed of establishment of specialcourt of election commission to

6Report of Election commission of India,2004


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

determine the qualification ofcandidate who have criminalantecedents and these courts willdetermine the cases summarilywhich will not affect the actual casesof court. There may be possibility thatcases of false charges would beraised. Such situations can be dealtby imposing time frame on the casesfiled prior to six months of electionalone would lead to disqualificationand not otherwise.

Sub-section (4) of Section 8 saysthat disqualification take into effect incase of member of parliament orstate legislature until 3 monthselapsed from date of conviction or ifwithin that period an appeal orapplication for revision is brought inrespect of the conviction or thesentence, until that appeal orapplication is disposed of by thecourt.

This privilege of 3 months forattraction of disqualification for memberof parliament is nothing but an instanceof destruction of basic tenets of equality.It is arbitrariness Once the lower courtconvicted the person who is member ofparliament or member of state legislaturethat order should be final one to attractthe disqualification. Law should beeffected from the date of decision ofconviction of member of parliament. If lawto enjoy all the privileges to member ofparliament during pendency of appeal inhigher court then it would be likeissuance of license for them to commitcrime and be there in the power andexploits the democratic principles of thesystem. This convicted clause should beamended to the effect that,“Disqualification take into effect in caseof member of parliament or state

legislature from the date of decisionof the court decided the conviction,though the appeal or application forrevision is brought in respect of theconviction or the sentence in HigherCourt, the conviction order should betreated as final for disqualification andsuch person shall cease to bemember of parliament or statelegislature.”

From the side of legislature there hasbeen half-hearted attempt madebecause ultimately legislative or lawmaking power in relation withelection recognized from parliamentor legislature of states. Politicalparties they use these dada’s andgoondas in elections so that they willsecure some seats in the parliamentor in state legislature. This shouldmandated to each political party that,if any political party gives ticket forelection to the person charged withcriminal case such person willdisqualify from contesting electionand further such party should bederecognized by the electioncommission. Such power shouldgiven to the election commission.But time and again it was realizedthat the intention of this legislatureis to protect their interests and notthe democracy.

Criminal Antecedent in Section 33-Aand 33-B of RPA,1951

In relation with the criminalantecedents of the candidates Supremecourt in Union of India v. Associationfor Democratic Rights7 observed thatit is right of voters to access theinformation guaranteed in Article 19 (1)(a) is equally vital as like right of citizensfor the same. This was considered asdynamic judgment delivered by

7AIR 2003 SC 2363


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

Supreme Court which is having theauthority of law under Article 141 of theconstitution. But The ordinance issued bythe President which is known as TheRepresentation of the People(Amendment) Ordinance ,2000 madeamendment in RPA,1951 which can beseen in the form of Section 33-A and 33-B

In this ordinance the Section 33-Aprovides Right to Information which isrecognized as a fundamental right ofevery citizen to know the pastantecedents their proposed candidate.This section obligates to furnish theinformation as to whether – (1) he isaccused of any offence punishable withimprisonment for two years or more in apending case in which a charge hasbeen framed by the court of competentjurisdiction, (2) he has been convicted ofan offence and sentenced toimprisonment for one year or more.

The Ordinance then adds thefollowing section as Section 33B :“Notwithstanding anything contained inany judgment, decree or order of anycourt or any direction, order or any otherinstruction issued by the ElectionCommission, no candidate shall beliable to disclose or furnish any suchinformation, in respect of his election,which is not required to be disclosedor furnished under this Act or the rulesmade there under.” This provision is anillustration of fraud committed by thelegislature itself, under the umbrella ofthe right to privacy. It nullifies the effectof Section 33-A which is unconstitutional

and out of legislative competence. Aperson who is going to hold public officecan not be allowed to undisclosed theinformation required for public purpose.This ordinance or Amendment wasbeyond the legislative competence.Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v.Union of India8 emphasized that todisclose the antecedents is the necessityof the day because of statutory provisionsof controlling wide spread corruptpractices as repeatedly pointed out byall concerned including various reportsof law commission and othercommittees. The Supreme Court had notmade any radical suggestion but eventhese suggestion are not acceptable tothe politicians. So this section 33B whichwhich takes away the judicialcompetence . This shows that thereexists a wide gulf between preachingand practice in today’s political arena.This section directly nullifies Article 191(a) of the constitution. It is undemocraticand directly strikes at the peoples rightto know – a democratic right.9 Thisdecision will be known as the milestonefor the process of reforms in election. Thisjudicial order nullifies the legislativeorder of Section 33-B of theRepresentation of Peoples Act.

(This Paper was presented inNational Seminar on Electrol Reforms :Issues and Challenges Organised byNew Law College, Pune. On 23rd Feb2013)

8AIR 2003 SC 24089M.P. Jain, Indian Constitutional Law, Butterworths and Wadhawa, Nagpur, Reprint 2012, p.896


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

Fear grips us in many situations. It isbelieved that many deaths due to snakebites are because of fear than poison.Fear breeds fear; for a person who istrembling with fear anything black is aghost! Catholic Encyclopedia says thatfear is a mental disturbance caused bythe perception of instant or future danger.1

The danger may be real ormisconceived. But the fear is real. Terror,dread, horror, fright, panic, alarm,trepidation, apprehension, awe,nightmare, phobia, scare etc are wordsused everyday all around by almost allpeople in some situation or other tospeak about fear.

Gandhiji, in his autobiography, haswritten that he was afraid of darknesswhen he was a child. Also, as anadolescent when he stealthily ate non-vegetarian food, fright did not let himsleep. He feared that a goat was bleatingin his stomach. Gandhiji in his debutcase before the small causes court gaveup due to lack of courage. He wrote ‘…had thus to cross examine the witnesses.I stood up, but my heart sank into myboots. My head was reeling… could thinkof no question to ask …I told the agentthat I could not conduct the case, … Ihastened from the court..’2 SwamiVivekanandha even as a child refused tobe afraid. In order to prevent childrenfrom gathering around a tree, they were

Bhaya, Nirbhaya and Law- Mrs Srividhya Jayakumar,

Incharge Principal

Bhiyu nakoos mi thuja paatishi aahe! – Shri Swami Samartha

scared away by telling that there was aghost on the tree. While all children fledfrom the place, child Vivekanandhaclimbed the tree and looked for theghost. This reflected his thirst for truth.This is a well known incident from his life.

Bhaya is bad. In clinical psychology,phobias of different kinds are consideredto be anxiety disorders requiringassistance to overcome. Phobia is anirresistible, irrational and excessive fearof an object or situation which is enduredwith distress. Dravidian belief decribesfear as foolishness. A freedom fighter andtamil poet Subramanya Bharathi by wayof commandments for good living said-“ avoid fear; don’t you lose courage”.Rabintranath Tagore’s awesome poem“ where the mind is without fear…” is oneof world’s greatest thoughts.Fearlessness is considered a virtue.

‘Bhaya’ is one of the nine rasaas innatyasasthra. Religions expect people tobe god fearing. ‘Bhaya-bhakthi’ isconsidered a foundational requirementfor spirituality. Is fear good? The geniusThiruvalluvar3 who forewarns: “Nothingto lose is no excuse to evil deeds; theywill cause you to lose yourself4” hasdevoted one chapter to ‘fear of evildeeds’ in his Thirukkural.5 Fear of doingwrongs is seen as a virtue and is verycrucial for a society. ‘Law fearing’ peopleenjoy peace and development for sure??

1www.newadvent.org2M K Gandhi, An Autobiography, Navajivan Publishing House, 2005, p 883A world renowned tamil poet who lived and wrote 2000 years before.4Verse 205, Thirukkural (of 1330 couplets). English version by J Narayanasamy, Sura Books pvt ltd.5The tamil work has been translated into many Indian and foreign languages.


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

If any law is an utter failure or is grosslyineffective, it is described as a paper tigeror a snake without fag! Is it because it hasdubious power to instill fear? It is believedthat when there is no ‘fear of law’ crimesescalate unabated and lawlessnessbecomes the creed! After the ‘Nirbhayaincident’6 even judges have asked, “Isthere no fear of law in this country?!7

Why is law obeyed? Where does theauthority of law spring from? How canlaw’s binding force be explained? Thisgreat question of jurisprudence has beenanswered differently by different jurists.Is it the fear of punishment which makespeople obey law? John Austin’simperative theory of law makingpunishment a vital component of thedefinition of law has invited severalcriticisms. His theory defining law as thecommand of the sovereign has beendescribed as the gunman’s theory!8

Realists perception of law as ‘what thejudges do’, is intellectually stimulating.Oliver Wendell Holmes said: theprophecies of what the courts will do, infact, and nothing more pretentious arewhat I mean by law. For so defining, hedid not consider the lawyer nor the judgeand not even the law abiding citizen butthe “bad man”. He said what a bad man-a man who is anxious to secure his ownselfish interests – would want to know isnot what the statute book or textbooks saybut what courts are likely to do in fact.9

True, a law not enforced is as good as‘non ens’. Why fear? Why obey?

What is the object and purpose oflaw? What is law set to achieve? Law isan institution of society and has definitesocial purposes. For Salmond, justice,stability and peaceful change are theends of law. For Roscoe Pound, law asan instrument of social engineering shallerect and maintain a social structurewhich satisfies maximum of wants withminimum of friction and waste. Does notthe Law seem to assure against fear ofinjury? The law seems to say: Fear not ofinjuries; am near and even if you go far Ishall reach you with my long arms. Lawinstills and boosts the feeling of securitywhich is the foundation of civilization. Thefunction of law is to eliminate fear of injury!Law in… Fear out!!

The basis of contract law is consent.Consent given due to fear is no consent.A contract vitiated by fear can beavoided.10 Right to marry and found afamily is a human right11. Marriageshould be founded upon love and notfear. A marriage so vitiated can beannulled12. Law of tort recognizes volentinon fit injuria as a general defence inactions for torts. Volens given under fearis no defence. Also law rejects thedefence of volenti non fit injuria againstheroes who fear not for their lives andlimbs but rush to rescue on cries for help.Recognition of private (self) defenceseems to protect the fearless who standup and fight against attack. Self defenceis an acclaimed defence under civil andcriminal law. Interestingly killing a wildanimal in self defence is not hunting

6 The gang rape of a medical student in a bus in Delhi in December 2013.7 See, No one has fear of law, says SC judge- The Hindu, www.thehindu.com (26.04.13)8See Goodhart, Law and the Moral Law, p 209See, P J Fitzerald, Salmond on Jurisprudence, Universal Law Publishing. 12th edition, p 37; Lloyd, Introductionto Jurisprudence, 2nd edition,p 27210 S. Indian Contract Act,187211Article 23 (2), ICCPR12 See, S. 12 (1) ©, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; S. 19, Divorce Act, 1869; S.25 (iii), Special Marriage Act, 1954


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

which is punishable under Wild LifeProtection Act, 1972.13

The object of penal law is to protectand preserve the sense of security in thepeople. The deterrent theory ofpunishment believes that the purpose ofpunishment is to instill a fear in the mindof criminals and prospective criminals tokeep them away from voluntaryperversity and criminality. Whoeverthreatens another with any injury to hisperson, reputation or property, or to theperson or reputation of any one in whomthat person is interested, with intent tocause alarm to that person, or to causethat person to do any act which he is notlegally bound to do, or to omit to do anyact which that person is legally entitledto do, as the means of avoiding theexecution of such threat, commitscriminal intimidation.14 The offences ofextortion15, known in English law asblackmail, are acts putting people in fearof injury to life, body, property, reputationor mind in order to dishonestly deprivepersons of property or valuablesecurity16.

The special statutes to deter terroristshave been frightened away by thehuman rights activists! TADA & POTAwere feared because they could notcombat terrorism but could terrorizeinnocents!! Anti terror laws have invitedcriticisms in America also. There hasbeen an appeal to the people not to

allow the President to use war onterrorism to rule by fear instead of bylaw.17Intimidation to deter a person fromvoting or to vote in a particular manner isan offence in the interest of ‘free and fair’elections18. Democracy is too great to leta people’s representative to resignwithout the presiding officer’s findingwhether the resignation is voluntary andgenuine.19 Secrecy in voting20 is alsopreserved so that the voter need not fearthe consequences of his voting for aparticular party or person.

A person apprehending arrest canseek bail21. A person who fears invasionof his/her rights can approach the courtsfor injunction.22 A writ prohibito canforestall jurisdiction excesses byauthorities23. Legal protection ofminorities is to allay their fears24. Fear ofharassment at the hands of the creditors,may drive a debtor to file an insolvencypetition. Creditors fearing fraud of debtorscan also invoke the insolvencyproceedings against them. Today,women need not fear of sexualharassment at work, thanks to theSupreme Court guidelines.25

Independence of judiciary is thesecurity that the courts decide without‘fear’ or favour. Constitutional law andadministrative law ‘embolden’ the ‘littleman’ to fight against the mightygovernment. Seeking to protect andconserve the environment, environmental

13 S.11 (2)14 S. 503, IPC,1860 (criminal intimidation)15 Ss. 383-389, IPC16 S. 30, IPC defines valuable security.17 Lewis Seiler and Dan Hamburg, Rule by fear or rule by law, www.sfgate.com (29.04.13)18 S. 171 C, IPC, 1860, S. 3 (1) (vii), SCs & STs (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 198919 See, Articles 101 (2) (b) & 190 (3) (b)20 Representation of People Act, 195121 S.438, Cr P C22 S. 38(3), Specific Relief Act, 196323 Articles 32, 136, 226, 227, COI24 Articles 29, 30, COI25 Vishaka v State of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC 3011


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

law relieves us from the fear ofdeterioration and destruction of theenvironment and the fear of handing overa barren earth to our future generations.Consumer law deters traders and serviceproviders from exploitative practices.Competition law protects the smallbusinesses from the fear of beingcrushed by the anti competitiveagreements.

Insurance law impresses upon us totranslate our fear into action to secure andinsure against loss. Putting in place aregime for the protection of the intellectualproperties, IP law drives away our fearsof infringement of our rights. InformationTechnology law deters people fromabusing the information technology.Endlessly the discourse can be furthercarried on to constrain one to accept thatlaw atleast minimizes ‘fear’ even if it doesnot totally eliminates.

The law is instilling fear to protectpeople against fears of injury!! Thequestion is: Is the fear instilled adequateand effective? How to tackle the devilishdaring? Man claims giant strides of

achievement but none of these stridesseek to ensure against lawlessness!Then, now and perhaps tomorrow also,we may have to look upon law as a‘gunman’ whether it deters thewrongdoers effectively or not. What isemboldening the criminals who violatelaw with impunity? Is it that the gun is notreal, but toy? Laws by themselves areinadequate without strong institutions forimplementation. Flaws inimplementation and corruption can befought only by vigil. 'The price of libertyis eternal vigilance'.

FEAR OF LAW is certainly vital.What is “FEAR OF LAWYERS”?.....??heard about a phobia of lawyers? Thereis a phobia ‘fearing lawyers’ identifiedand named DIKIGOROSOPHOBIA26.Unbelievable??? May be some peoplefear lawyers: but do lawyers fear?Shakespeare tried in vain to frighten: Thefirst thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.27

Lawyers fear nothing but their ownconscience!! Their conscience is LAW!

_Z§ gwXY Vw§O JmoñQ> h o n¥Ïdr _mobmMrVw Mmb nwTo> Vwbm ao JS>çm ^rVr Hw$UmMr !! **

26 www.google.co.in27 Shakespeare : King Henry VI, Part 2, Act 1 V, Scene 2.**Thankful acknowledgement to Prof Mrs Janavi Navre for identifying these beautiful lines.


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

It is only in India that you can find Thetelecom minister himself involved ina scam amounting to a loss of nearly200 Crores, the president of IndianOlympics getting involved incommon wealth games scams,people contesting and even winningelections while undergoingsentences in prison.

‘Democracy’ is not entirely unknownto us. Infact , that was the driving forcewhich prompted our freedomstruggle. To be understood in thewords of sir Winston churchill , It issomething like “little man walkinginto the little booth with a littlepencil, making a little cross on alittle bit of paper. No amount ofrhetoric or voluminous discussioncan possibly diminish theoverwhelming importance of thatpoint.” In short, people are governedby their own elected representatives.

India adopted democracy as its formof Government with the intention ofplacing the welfare and wellbeing ofits citizens in the highest position bygoverning them by the laws andregulation framed by their electedrepresentatives.

The crux in the successful functioningof democracy thus lies in the handsof such elected representatives. i.ein the ‘Political System’ of thecountry, which is rightly known as thenervous system of the country

The Indian political scenario whichwas earlier glorified by great heroeslike Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru, Motilal

‘’Rising number of criminals in Parliament andState Legislature is disastrous for democracy’’

Ms. Ranjani Krishnan, I LLB

Nehru, Rajagopalachari, whoworked in the interest of the society,purely motivated by the passion toserve people, is now characterizedby corrupt people, whose main aimis to churn out as much wealth aspossible from the public, enjoy thepower of their seats, loot the country& ultimately accomplish theirpersonal self centric goals, withoutbothering about the purpose forwhich they were elected.

We say India was finally freed fromthe clutches of British rule after 150years of tremendous struggle &bloodshed…but only to give thereins back in the hands of such bloodsuckers. So isn’t it right to say thatIndia is still struggling for itsfreedom?

Why do we find mind bogglingincome & assest values of many MPs& MLAs? whose money do you thnkit is?..friends it s our very own hardearned money. Just a few days ago,a petition was filed in the high court-when TDS can be deducted from acommon man’s salary, then why notfrom that of an MP or MLA,? Why thisspecial allowance four them.

One of the main reasons for thispathetic condition is somethingcalled as ‘criminalisation of politics’which has increased by leaps andbounds in the recent years.

Politics has now become the mostcherished profession for people withcriminal records. Over 100 membersof our house of parliament & even the


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

state legislatures have wellestablished criminal antecedents.Many of our elected leaders, withlong-pending corruption cases incourts, also become members of theUnion or State cabinets withenormous powers to allocate publicresources and run publicenterprises.

The parliament has many major andkey functions to perform like controlof public finance, control of theexecutive impeachement of highconstitutional officials. How can wegive this important. Duty in the handsof criminals? Isn’t this disastrous fordemocracy? Ñï> XwO©Zm§{M H$er KS>o bmoH$ godm?

The scene inside a parliament houseor even a legislative assembly isworth watching. That pious placewhere in the future of a country isdetermined, is worst than a streetfight, with people hurling chappalsand abuses at one another. Are thesepeople who don’t even respect thesanctity of their seats going to protectour democracy?

It is a well known fact that politiciansuse criminals to dominate theelection scene in India. Whathappens over the time is that theseelements slowly start gaining powerunder the umbrella of such corruptpoliticians and that is how we havepeople charged with serious &heinous crimes like kidnapping,,,rape..rioting, framing policies for us.What would be the future of India inthe hands of such People?

One of things to be blamed is theweak judicial system of the country.The Indian judicial system is wellknown for the pace with which itdelivers judgement. The person getsjustice usually in his deathbed. Till

he is alive all he does is take roundsto the court. & the advantage of thisdelay, is utilized to the fullest extentby our respected MPs & MLAs. Tillthe trial is going on, they take theadvantage of presumption ofinnocence, and once convicted, goon appeal.

In 13th parliamentary polls of 1999,119 were charged with heinouscrimes like rape, kidnapping andrioting.

Corruption is in the core of politics.Many politicians engage incorruption by using ‘ Babus’. Thesebabus are not willing to changebecause of the fear of losing power,lack of sense of duty, insensitivity tothe common man’s problems and soon.

There is corruption involved in everysmall scheme of the government.Right from providing rations to thepoor, employment facilities in therural areas ( MGREGS ), infact evenin employing teachers. What is leftof democracy if corruption enterseven the field of education? It willmerely be “ Democracy of the sheep,for the sheep & by the sheep”

The politicians do not wantcorruption to be checked for their ownselfish needs. All they do is give falsepromises; The delay in Lokpal billvery well fortifies our suspicion.. Butone thing is for sure that the failureof this lokpal bill is definitely adisaster for the democracy.

The 1993 serial blasts which rockedthe financial capital of India from itsfoundation, revealed a piece ofstartling information. The VohraCommittee which was appointed tolook into the blasts, came out with


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

deep connections of politicians withorganized crime all over India, that itwas barred from publication. In facteven the supreme court in itsjudgement ‘’ Dinesh Trivedi v/sUnion of India favoured the govt. inbarring its publication.

It will not be right to say that reformshave not been undertaken forimproving the situation. The supremecourt judgment on 13.3.2003“Peoples Union for Civil Libertiesv/s Union of India & others whichgave rise to amending the ECInorms, mandates that all thosecandidates with cases pendingagainst them or convicted shoulddisclose their convictions. As a resultof this,, 93 MPs and 10 ministers inManmohan Singh’s ministry cameunder the scanner on variouscriminal charges. But again the loop

hole in this norm is that, it merelymandates the disclosures, but doesnot stop them from contesting theelections.

After all said and done, the blameultimately rests on we commonpeople as we are the onesnominating such criminals. But hereagain, the entire blame cannot reston us due to the prevalence ofmalpractices’ during voting likepurchasing votes, booth capturing& inducing voters. Is thisdemocracy? Where is our right tovote?.

India at present is known as aDEVELOPING country among theother countries of the world. But if thenervous system of the country itselfis at fault, wont the countryparalyse?

Is it really true to say that risingnumber of criminals in parliament andlegislative assembly is disastrous fordemocracy? Absolutely not....whenasked to define democracy MackIverobserves “democracy is not the way ofgoverning by majority or otherwise, butprimarily a way of determining who shallgovern. Some democracies which wereknown as direct democracies existed inthe ancient Greek cities where publicdirectly participated in the working of thegovernment. But most of thedemocracies today including India, arerepresentative democracies where rulersare elected by the people and the

Rising number of criminals in Parliament andLegislative Assembly is not disastrous for democracy

- Krushna Kamat

legislature is constituted by electedrepresentatives. According to ‘ECI”norms the candidate contesting electionhas to inform about his criminalantecedents but still if the people electthem, it is simply because they think andtrust that the representative they haveelected understands their wish andneeds in a better way. Democracy doesnot say anything good or bad it is just akey to safeguard our fundamental rightsguaranteed under the constitution.According to me it is not rising numberof criminals but rising number of peoplewith criminal charges. Now let us try tounderstand who is a criminal? Criminal


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

is one who is convicted of a crime. So isit correct to call an accused a criminal?No not at all. It will be wrong to call anaccused a criminal until he is convictedby the highest court. In spite of criminalcharges on MLAs and MPs there are somany of them who are working for thebetterment of our country.

India is one of the largestdemocracies and is bound to have a cutthroat competition. Rising number ofpeople with criminal charges is anobvious result of political competitionand power play. So what are we shoutingabout? How many of us know that it is soeasy to file a criminal allegation againstanybody, under CrPC? Under S.154it is mandatory for a police officer to filean FIR if the offence is cognizable and ifit is not done so this will amount tocontempt of court and the police officerwho rejects to file such FIR will be pulledup.

Just as the relevant qualification forselection in Indian cricket team is not theattainment of any educational degreesbut the ability to play cricket well, therelevant qualification for being an MLA orMP is to understand the people, theirproblems and to represent their interest.Now coming to “Law”, a law is a billbefore it is passed. It is to be noted thatthe MCOCA was passed by theVidhansabha assembly in 1999 with aheavy majority and without much protest.This shows how stead fast our MLAS areagainst crimes.

An elected representative is actuallya part of our society which is havingcriminal elements in every sector.Criminal elements exist in various sectorslike education, medical, sports etc.People with criminal charges may affectthe working of the government in someway but in no way it will make ourdemocracy disastrous. Representing the

will of the people in the law corridors willnot be affected. If MPs & MLAs fail torespect will of the people, the weapon of“vote” is in our hands. We determinewhether we return them to office or wesend them home!

Now there is this question that we allneed to ask ourselves, Are we reallyhappy with the progress of our countryin this 66years of independence? If theanswer is no...what is the reason behindit? Is the reason lying only in theparliament and legislative assembly?Are we as people of this country notresponsible?

It is the attitude of people towardsgovernment which has to change. Wetake pride in bunking the poling daysand going out for a picnic. Are we ascitizens honest too? Are we not causingany harm to our democracy? Accordingto me we are the real criminals. You andme are a greater threat to our democracy.How many of us know why our right tovote is so important? How many of us doregularly pay income tax, sale tax,municipal tax? How many of us do reallyfear law? Its high time by now that weneed to understand our duty towards ourcountry. So let us stop playing this blamegame. As rightly said by MahatmaGandhi, “Man and his deeds are twodistinct things the doer and the deeds,good or bad, always deserves respector pity as the case may be. So lets hatethe sin and not the sinner.” It is very easyto understand but rarely practiced andthat is why the poison of hate is spreadthrough the world.....

In a healthy democracy where rightto get elected is cherished, unhealthycompetition results in false criminalcharges. Let us be wiser to remove thechaff from the grain! Let us not hate allpoliticians’! Let us love & honour our rightto vote!


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

LL. B. is a professional course andhence practical training is an integral partof it. Yes – exams are important – after allyou have to pass 24 exams to get thecoveted degree, but mere academicswithout debates and moot courts is likea Mango Mastani without ice cream(those who travel to Pune would know)!

Debates are like a learner’s licenseto moot courts. From personalexperience the author can say that whileacademics is the foundation, the level ofthinking required for a debate is 10 timesthat of exams and that required for amoot court is 100 times that of a debate!

So the next question would be - Howto handle these moot courts? Well, let usfirst get the basics right – Unless youspeak well, the judge is not going to listento you. If a moot court judge won’t listento you, best of luck with the real judge (ifyou happen to go into practice). So firstthings first – develop your oratory. If youare not good at that art, then pick up somebook on developing oratory and get thatthing sorted out.

Now that the oratory part is taken careof, we start the game. You would begiven a fact sheet which wouldelaborately contain all the facts of thecase. Usually in competitions, such factsheets are meticulously drafted. Howeverin internal moot courts, it may be givenin brief. In competitions, this is your“Bhagwad Gita” – there is no worldbeyond the fact sheet. However ininternal moot courts, sometimes factsmay be very brief in which case you mayhave to assume some facts. But keep inmind that your assumptions cannot be

Harnessing the dragon called “Moot Court”Jayesh Gopal Gokhale

III LL.B. Student

ultra vires to the given facts.

Once you have the fact sheet, youwould be allocated your side – petitioneror respondent. In competitions you haveto prepare for both. Once you take aposition, you have to put yourselves inthe shoes of your client and redraft thefacts from his point of view. So the firsttask that needs to be done in a moot courtis drafting the facts from the vantage pointof your client. However, these redraftedfacts cannot be ultra vires to the fact sheetprovided. In fact, a considerable amountof skill may be required to redraft suchfacts by which the redrafted facts wouldimply that your client has a strong case.

After the facts have been drafted, thenext job is framing of the issues. Issuemeans any point of fact which needs tobe decided either way to give the case alogical conclusion. Examples of issuesmay be - “Is the contract enforceable inlaw?” or “Is the act of the accused withinparameters of culpable homicide?”. Youwould hope that all issues are decidedto your advantage.

Once issues have been finalized,then you have to justify as to how everyissue should be decided in your favor.For this, you have to take recourse of lawwhich would be found in statutes andcase laws. Remember – case laws areinterpretation of statutes, so unless yourcase is not based on any statute (e.g. –torts), first take bare acts and text booksof the relevant statutes and search for thecorresponding section of the statutewhich applies to your case. Try tologically fit in the sections to your factsand most importantly to your advantage.


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

When statute will not completely satisfyyour facts, open the books and look forrelevant case laws.

It is at this point of time where thereal fun begins. If you are really seriousto enter a competition, also think as tohow the opponent will counter your legalpropositions and find answers to hiscounter strategy and so on. It is a gameof chess and you have to think manymoves in advance and hope to outsmartyour opponent.

After your arguments are done,summarize them for you will not be ableto speak out the entire thing in the allottedtime. Then prepare a compilation calledas “memorial”. The memorial primarilyconsists of Cover Page, Table ofContents, Index of Authorities, Statementof Jurisdiction, Statement of Facts,Statement of Issues, Body of Arguments,Summary of Arguments and your Prayer.Statement of Jurisdiction is importantfrom the point of view of the petitioner asyou have to justify to the court that why ithas jurisdiction in the matter. Read thegiven fact sheet carefully and seewhether it is a petition, appeal or revisionand accordingly draft your statement asper relevant provisions of law. Finallycomes the prayer in which you have topray to the court to grant reliefs. Theprayer should be exhaustive of all reliefssought and the court will not grant youany relief not prayed for.

Now is the time for learning somecourtroom manners. Firstly you have todress in courtroom formals; incompetitions that is mandatory. Find outwhich court you are approaching fromyour problem statement and accordinglyapproach the court as “Your Honour” forcourts lower to High Courts and “YourLordship/Ladyship” for High Courts andSupreme Court. Before you enter the

court room, keep your one hand on yourchest and bow before the court. The seatof justice is the seat of God and thissanctity has to be maintained. When yourname is called, begin preferably with thefollowing line – “May it please yourhonour/lordship/ladyship! In the matterof XXX v/s YYY, I am the counsel for thep l a i n t i f f / p e t i t i o n e r / a p p e l l a n t /respondent/defendant”. Thereafter askfor permission to proceed and firsthighlight the facts which you haveredrafted. Thereafter continue withissues, arguments and finally the prayer.

It is possible and probable that thecourt may interrupt you while you arespeaking which is likely to break yourrhythm. However you have no choice asyou are bound to go as per the directionsof the court. If a question is asked andyou are unaware of the answer, maintainyour composure and try to find a solutionfor a minute. If you still cannot find asolution, pray for time. It is imperative thatunder all circumstances you shallapproach the court with utmost respect.You may be assertive but shall be polite.In real courts, the conduct of theadvocate counts a lot especially in caseswhere there is a question of discretionaryremedy.

Before the moot court begins, youshall be given the memorial of youropponent. Attack the memorial as a trueopponent and find out allinconsistencies in the same. Politelypoint out those inconsistencies when itis your turn to speak. Explain to the courtlogically how the legal propositionasserted by the opponent does not fit tothe facts of the case.

Finally, after a judgment ispronounced (if it is pronounced) and itis in your favor, don’t react as if you havewon the world cup. Regardless of


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

whether you lose or win, calmly say“Obliged” and after bowing before thecourt take your seat. Remember – youare a professional and this is not apersonal battle, so you shall also treatyour opponent with utmost respect andrefer to him as “learned friend”whenever the occasion arises.

This article will only give you a basicidea as to how to approach the mootcourt, but like life, moot court cannot betaught with books – you have to live ityourselves. So just go out there andenjoy your performance!

In the Bhagwad Gita, Lord Krishnasays ‘’The fourfold caste system(Brahmins, Kshatriyas, vaishyas &sudras) is NOT based on birth, but basedon three attributes of people (Aura,Energy and Matter) and the professioncarried on by them.

Hence we have,

Brahmins (Aura dominant) :engaged in writing, teaching,consulting etc.

Kshatriyas ( Energy dominant) :Engaged in managing, leading,controlling & organizing.

Vaishyas ( Matter dominant,supported by energy) : Doingbusiness, trading, banking, etc

Sudras (matter dominant ) :construction, agriculture, etc.

In the absence of properunderstanding of the scriptures, theIndian society has inherited a castesystem, which has moved away from thelogic of these recommendations, whichin turn is causing more harm than goodto the society.

The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Should be Amended toSpecifically Exclude Suppression / Misrepresentation of

Caste as A Ground for Nullity of Marriage

Ms. Ranjani Krishnan, I LL.B. student

( source : ‘ Gita for joyful living’).

It is said that ‘Marriages’ are madein heaven,and celebrated on earth. It isa special bond shared between twosouls. According to Hinduism, Marriagebetween two souls stretches beyond onelifetime, and may continue upto atleastseven lifetimes. When a male andfemale accept each other, the mutuallove, desire, respect for each other, theinbuilt bond existing between them, thefaith that they would strive to make theirmarital life a success, is what matters.‘Caste’ is the last consideration.Because, by that time you have alreadyappreciated the qualities of each other.

When the fundamental law does notaccept discrimination on caste and thepreamble also enshrines the same, arewe still going to speak on thiscaste...caste...caste...Under Art.51A wehave a fundamental duty to uphold &abide by the Constitution of India.Several personal laws, such as hindulaw, muslim law, parsi law and so onexist. These are by and large nonstatutory traditional systems of law,having some affinity with the concerned


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

religion. Being the ancient systems oflaw, there are several aspects of thissystem, which are out of time with themodern time & may even beincompatible with some fundamentalrights. In Madhu Kishwar v/s State ofBihar (AIR 1996 SC 1864) JusticeRamaswami observed that ‘It is essentialthat the customs repugnant to aconstitutional scheme, must always yieldplace to fundamental rights. (minorityview)

When we are speaking that ‘caste’itself is of the least consideration in amarriage, then how does the suppressionor non suppression of it matter in anyway? & merely because the person hassuppressed his/her caste, should thatamount to nullity? Wont this be a greatinjustice to the institution of marriage?And even worse, to the individuals?.Infact , no such ground is actually speltin law. The Hindu Marriage Act onlystates that suppression of a material fact,is a valid ground for nullity of marriage.

My question is, Is caste a materialfact? What is a material fact? It is a factthat would be to a reasonable person,germane to a decision to be made, asdistinguished from any trivial detail. Afteryou have mutually accepted each other,respected one anothers qualities, formeda bond with each other, would you stillconsider caste to be a material fact?Even in this 21st century, when we haveadvanced so much in all walks of life, whyare we still holding on to something astrivial as caste?

The Khap panchayats also in thename of Honour killing, kill the girl whohas had an intercaste marriage. It is likeHonour for the family, and death for thegirl firstly where is ‘honour’ in killing.Secondly has she committed such aheinous crime by marrying the person ofher choice, that she has to pay for it withher life? The couple is discarded by thesociety, the girl is asked to return to herown family, and if she refuses, both areburnt alive so as to eliminate any policerecord. If these are the things happening& the law is considering caste as amaterial fact, aren’t we ourselvesperpetuating castesim ?

Another aspect is that today’s youthdon’t find caste as something soimportant, so as to disclose it.I have notlied, nor have i mentioned. Is your lovefor me going to change with my caste?After having understood so much as towhy caste is not a material fact, let usrevisit our very old question as to whyshould the parliamentary intervention asin an amendment be required? Theanswer to that question is- At present theterm material fact is left to judicialinterpretation. But judicial precedents donot represent the will of the people, norsocial or public interest, & also takes alot of time. On the other hand, urgentactions to satisfy human needs andwants can be given exactly & peacefullyonly by legislation. & hence, theamendment.

‘We are not myths of the past, orruins in the jungle. We are peopleand we want to be respected, not tobe victims of intolerance and racism’


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 cameinto force on 18/5/1955. This Act isapplicable not only to the hindus in Indiabut also to the hindus who are domiciledin India and living abroad. Before we getinto the core of the topic, let us have abrief understanding about the concept ofmarriage according to the ancient vedicperiod.

Even in the patriarchal society of rig-vedic hindus, marriage was consideredas a sacramental union and it continuesto be so even today. According to theshastra, wife is said to be the ‘ardhangini’of the husband; a man is said to beincomplete without a woman. A wife isnot only a ‘ghrihapatni’ but also a‘dharmapatni’so it is rightly said insanskrit that she is karye shu mantri,karune shu dasi, bhoje shu mata,shayane shu rambha.manana kulkshama daya stree sada gun yuktapriya dharma-patni.

Marriage in ancient times was aunion which could not be dissolved, itwas only in the following five cases wherethe sages allowed the dissolution ofmarriage,

Husband was missing

Husband was dead

Husband had become a ascetic

Husband is impotent

Husband is outcaste (Paras Diwan,Hindu Law)

Now according to the modern hindulaw or the Hindu Marriage Act, the nullity

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Should Not be Amended toSpecifically Exclude Suppression/Misrepresentation of

Caste as A Ground for Nullity of MarriageMs. Krushna Kamat, I LL.B. Student

of marriage relates to the pre-marriageimpediments to marriage. This gives riseto classification of marriage into twotypes, void marriage and voidablemarriage. Void marriage is no marriage;it is void-ab-initio. Where as voidablemarriage is perfectly valid and bindinguntil a decree annulling it is passed. Thegrounds of voidable marriage are thefollowing,

1. Respondents inablity to consumatethe marriage on account of his/herimpotency

2. Respondent’s inability to consent oris suffering from mental disorder

3. Concealment of pre marriagepregnancy by the respondent

4. Consent of the petitioner obtained byforce or fraud.

‘Force’ under matrimonial law doesnot have the same meaning as underIndian S.17 of Contract Act, mostimportant aspect of fraud undermatrimonial law i s that, it is not everymisrepresentation that amounts to fraudfor example, the matrimonial columns ofour newspapers are full withadvertisements that a suitable match isneeded for a good looking, submissivegirl and in the same way the bridegroomis advertised saying that the boy is wellsettled ,well educated etc.now if each ofthis statement turns to be false, can amarriage be avoided? and the answeris no!

In, Purbi v. Basudev the wife allegedthat her husband’s premarriage boasting


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

about his high lifestyle induced her tomarry him; it was held that this does notamount to fraud. So now a question arisesin our mind that which kind of fraud canrender the marriage ‘voidable’?According to the Marriage Law Act, 1976the fraud must relate to the ceremony ofmarriage or to any ‘material fact’concerning the respondent. ‘Materialfact’ is the fact that has direct effect onthe decision or the legal relationship ofthe parties. So is suppression of castenot a material fact? Will this fact not affectthe marriage fundamentally?

Under public law ‘caste’ is evil. Inpersonal life, state shall not interfere inthe beliefs of people. In case of BimlaDevi v.Shankarlal it was held thatsuppression of caste is a sufficientground for nullity of marriage. In spite ofwe promoting inter-caste marriagesunder hindu law, inter-religious marriageunder special marriage act, why peoplehave to lie about their caste that to in sucha holy institution like marriage? Does thisnot show that people lack respect in ourlegislature? Inspite of all this, if stillsomebody commits a fraud with aintention to deceive, fair justice has to bemade towards the person so deceivedby giving him a right to annul or avoidsuch marriage.

Many of us might think that it is aconstitutional guarantee that no personshall be discriminated on the basis ofcaste/religion but we have to learn thatpersonal laws are excluded from theambit of fundamental rights. In, State ofBombay v. Narasu, AIR 1952 Bom 84Justice.Gajendragadkar observed thatthe framers of the constitution wanted toleave the personal law out side the ambitof fundamental rights so they did noteven include the personal laws within thedefinition of expression “law in force”because they were aware that thepersonal laws need to be reformed inmany material particulars. See alsoKrishna Singh v. Mathura Ahir, AIR 1980SC 707; Sarla Mudgal v UOI , (1995) 3SCC 635, Ahmedabad Women ActionGroup v UOI, AIR 1997 SC 3614.

Suppression of caste is a fair enoughground of nullity of marriage and there isno need of any amendment for excludingit. Parties to A marriage mustremember that trust in marriage islike a glue, which if not present, theparties to the marriage cannot sticktogether…


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

Aíbrb {MÌnQ>mMr nmoñQ>g© gmd©O{ZH$ dhmZm§daVr Am{UañË`mdaVr bmdÊ`m~Ôb {ZfoY

gm¡. ñdmVr ~mb Q>|~oàW_ df©, {d{Y {dÚm{W©Zr

A{bH$S>o H$mhr {Xdgm§nydu _w§~B© _hmZJanm{bHo$À`màemgZmZo Aíbrb {MÌnQ>mMr nmoñQ>g© ~oñQ (BEST) ~gogAm{U S>onmo `m {R>H$mUr bmdÊ`mnmgyZ _ÁOmd H$aUmarà^mdr _mohr_ am~{dbr.

""{Oñ_-2'' `m {MÌnQ>mÀ`m nmoñQ>g©Zr `m dmXmbmgwédmV Pmbr. H$maU ""H|$Ðr` {MÌnQ> à_mU ~moS>©'' `m§Zr`m {MÌnQ>mbm "A' à_mUnÌ {Xbo. hm {MÌnQ> g_mOmVrbgd© ñVam_Yrb ì`ŠVtZr ~KÊ`mgmR>r nmÌ ZgyZ \$ŠV "àm¡T>'ì`ŠVrM ~Ky eH$VmV Ago ho à_mUnÌ hmoVo.

Ë`m nmoñQ>adaVr EH$m, AY©Z½Z ñÌrZo nm§T>ao {ÔboboA§JdñÌ Aem nÕVrZo A§JmdaVr AmoT>bobo OoUo H$éZ~KUmè`m§À`m _Zm_Ü o Aíbrb md {Z_m©U hmoVrb. AernmoñQ>g© gmd©O{ZH$ {R>H$mUr gd© bmoH$, _wbo, _wbr `m§À`mÑîQ>rg nS>Vrb Aem nÕVrZo bmdÊ`mV Ambr hmoVr. ~gogAgVrb, drOoMo Im§~ AgVrb qH$dm bhmZ PmonS>çmAgVrb g_mOmVrb Z¡{VH$Voda AmKmV H$aUmar nmoñQ>g©gJirH$S>o {XgV hmoVr.

_hmamîQ´> {d[Y_§S>imVrb EH$m gXñ`mZo `m JmoîQ>rbm{damoY Ho$bm Am{U hr JmoîQ> _w§~B© _hmZJanm{bHo$À`màemgZmÀ`m bjmV AmUyZ {Xbr. hr gd© nmoñQ>g© A{Ve`~r^Ëg AgyZ H$moUË`mhr gwk ZmJ[aH$m§À`m ^mdZm§daVrXwîn[aUm_ H$aUmar AmhoV Ago nm{bH$m àemgZmÀ`m{ZXe©Zmg Ambo.

_w§~B© _hmZJanm{bHo$À`m A{YH$mè`m§Zr Ëd[aV 75~gog 25 ~g S>onmo VgoM {dOoMo Im§~, ~gIm§~o `mdarbgd© Aíbrb nmoñQ>g© H$mTy>Z Q>mH$bo. _w§~B© _hmZJanm{bH$mH$m`Xm, 1988 _Yrb H$b_-63(K) , 64(3)(C) Am{U328 VgoM pñÌ`m§Mo Aíbrb dU©Z (à{V~§YH$) H$m`Xm1986 H$b_-3 Zwgma _w§~B© _hmnm{bHo$Zo darb H¥$Vrà^mdrnUo Am{U VËnaVoZo Ho$br.

pñÌ`m§Mo AíbrbnUo dU©Z åhUOo ZH$mo Ë`m nÕVrZoË`m§Mr eara`îQ>r (Figure) XmIdUo qH$dm earamMm {d{eîQ>

^mJ XmIdUo Á`m_YyZ ~r^ËgnUm qH$dm Am|JidmUm md{Z_m©U hmoB©b. pñÌ`m§Mm XOm©, ñWmZ H$_r {H§$dm ImbÀ`mñVam§daVr XmIdyZ gmd©O{ZH$ ZrVr_yë o qH$dm ZrVr_Îmm`mda AmKmV hmoB©b `m nÕVrZo ñÌr`m§Mo dU©Z H$aUo hmo .

Aem àH$maÀ`m Aíbrb nmoñQ>g©_wio ñÌrMo Mm[aÍ`hZZ Va hmoVoM nU Ë`mM~amo~a g_mOm_Ü o JwÝhoJmar àd¥ÎmrdmT>Ê`mgmR>r Am{U EHy$UM pñÌ`m§Mo OrdZ Am{U Ë`m§Mrà{VîR>m YmoŠ`mV oÊ`mgmR>r m JmoîQ>r ~è`mMdoim H$maUr yVR>aVmV. H$maU Hw$Um ì`ŠVrÀ`m _Zm_Üò Aíbrb ^md{Z_m©U H$aÊ`mgmR>r hr Aer nmoñQ>g© nwaoer R>aVmV. gmd©O{ZH${R>H$mUr Aem nmoñQ>g©_wio [ajmMmbH$, Q>°ŠgrMmbH$ `m§Mobj doYyZ KoVë`m_wio ~è`mMdoim AnKmVhr hmoVmV.

nmoñQ>g© àX{e©V H$aUmao Agohr åhUy eH$VmV H$s^maVr` amÁ`KQ>ZoV AZwÀN> oX 19 (1)(A) _ÜòA{^ì`ŠVr ñdmV§Í` àË oH$ ZmJ[aH$mg {Xbo Amho Am{UË`mZwgma nmoñQ>g© àX{e©V H$aUo ho _yb yV A{YH$mam_Ü oòVo. nU Ë`mM g§{dYmZmZo AZwÀN>oX 19 (2) _ÜòA{^ì`ŠVr ñdmV§Í`mda KmVboë`m `mo½` {Z~ªYmZwgma hoñdmV§Í` gmd©O{ZH$ {hV, Z¡{VH$Vm Am{U gä`Vm `m§À`mAmYrZ amhÿZ Cn^moJm`Mo Amho. Ë`m_wio `m JmoîQ>r nmoñQ>g©V`ma H$aUmè`m§Zr bjmV KoÊ`mMr JaO AmO {Z_m©U PmbrAmho.

H$Xm{MV Ago g_Obo OmD$ eH$Vo H$s, {MÌnQ>m§À`mOmhramVr {Z`§{ÌV H$aÊ`mMo H$m_ ""{MÌnQ> n[a{ZarjU(Censor) ~moS>m©Mo AgVo. nU Iar n[apñWVr IynM doJirAmho.

{gZo_°Q>moJ«m\$ H$m`Xm 1952 `m_Yrb {Z`_ AWdm_mJ©Xe©H$ VÎdo `m_Ü o AíbrbVo g§~§Yr JmoîQ>rMm g_mdoeqH$dm {Z §ÌU m§Mm g_mdoe à^mdrnUo m H$m`Úm_Ü o {XgyZoV Zmhr. `m JmoîQ>r AíbrbVog§~§Yr Xoem_Ü o AgUmè`m

gd© g_mdoer H$m`Úm_Ü o Am{U àm_w»`mZo ^maVr` X§S>g§{hVoÀ`m H$b_-292 Am{U 293 `m_Ü o {XgyZ oVmV.


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

^m.X.{d. 292-298 _Ü o Aem àH$maMo H¥$Ë` åhUOoMgmd©O{ZH$ Amamo½`mg d Z¡VH$Vog YmoH$m nmohmoM{dUmao JwÝhoAmhoV d Vo {ejog nmÌ AmhoV. VgoM ^maVr` JwÝho à{H«$`mg§{hVmÝd o Aem àH$maMo {dVaV Ho$bobo gm{hË` d gmYZX§Sm>{YH$mè`mZo AmoXe XodyZ VmËH$mi Oá Ho$bo OmdyeH$VmV. Ë`mM~amo~a H|$ÐmZo {H$d§m amÁ`mZo ~Z{dboë`m AÝ`H$m`Úm_Ü o Ë`mMm g_mdoe {XgyZ oVmo. _{hbm§Mo AíbrbdU©Z (à{V~§YH$) H$m`Xm 1986 hm H$m`Xm qH$dm `mH$m`ÚmMr A§_b~OmdUr {dH$mg {d^mJ m§À`mH$S>o Amho.na§Vw `m g§X^m©V H$m ©dmhr H$aÊ`mMr O~m~Xmar ñWm{ZH$A{YH$mar qH$dm ñWm{ZH$ àemgZ `m§Mr Amho.

_J ho àemgZ Amnë`m A{YH$mamMm {H$VnV dmnaH$ê$Z mdaVr {Z §ÌU Kmby eH$Vo mg§X^m©V {H$Vr amÁ`m§ZrqH$dm _hmZJanm{bH$m {H$§dm ZJa àemgZ `m§Zr {Z`_~Z{dbo Am{U nwT>o {Z`_ ~ZdyZ Ë`mMr A§_b~OmdUr {H$Vr`mo½` nÕVrZo Ho$br Jobr. H$maU Aer nmoñQ>g© àËòH$amÁ`m_Yrb eha, Jmd m {R>H$mUr bmdbobr {XgVmV nUË`mdaVr {Z §ÌU, {Z~ªY {XgyZ oV Zmhr.

Aer Aíbrb nmoñQ>g© gmd©O{ZH$[aË`m àX{e©VH$aÊ`mda {ZfoY Am{U {Z~ªY KmbÊ`mMr JaO Amho. H|$Ðr`{MÌnQ> à_mU _§S>i (Censor Board) {MÌnQ>mbm à_m{UVH$aVmZm ImÌr XoVo {H$ npãb{gQ>r ñH«$sqZJ H${_Q>rZo{MÌnQ>mVrb gd© mJ VnmgyZ nm{hbm AgyZ Vmo gmd©O{ZH$ñdmñWmgmR>r hm{ZH$maH$ Zmhr. `mMm CÔoe AíbrbVonmgyZnamd¥Îm hm oD$Z _{hbm§Mr à{VîR>m OmonmgUo Am{U{MÌnQ>mVrb ^S>H$ Ñî o (JwÝhoJmar) Q>miUo hm AgVmo.

~oñQ> (BEST) hr emgZmMr n[adhZ godm Amnë`m~gog qH$dm ~g Wm§~o mdaVr CËnÞ {_i{dÊ`mÀ`m CÔoemZoOm{hamVr bmdVo. nU `m_Üò ~oñQ Agob qH$dm AÝ`H$moUVohr _§S>i g§ñWm Agob Ë`m§Zr nmoñQ>g© bmdy XoÊ`mAJmoXa ZJa àemgZ qH$dm npãbH$ ñH«$sqZJ H${_Q>r `m§ZrnmoñQ>g©gmR>r nadmZJr {Xbobr Amho H$s Zmhr qH$dm nmoñQ>abmdÊ`mgmR>r à_m{UV Ho$bo Amho H$m? `mMr ImÌr H$éZMKoVbr nm{hOo VaM Ago Am|JidmUo, bÁOmñnX àH$maWm§~Vrb.

^maVr` amÁ`KQ>ZoZo gd© ZmJ[aH$m§gmR>r AZwÀN>oX 51(A) (C) > _Üò _{hbm§àVr qH$dm Ë`m§Mr à{VîRm> H$_rH$aUmè`m gd© Mm{b[aVr àWm gmoSy>Z XoÊ`mMo Xm{`Ëd {XboAmho.

AíbrbVoMr ì`m»`m hr H$mbnaËdo ñWbnaËdo~XbUmar Amho. \$ŠV pñÌ`m§Zm Aíbrb XmIdUo Am{Unwéfm§Zm Z XmI{dUo m_YyZhr qH$dm _J nwéfm§ZmM AíbrbXmI{dUo m_Ü o _mZdr à{VîR>oMr hmZr hmoVoM Am{U åhUyZAZwÀN>oX 21 Zwgma H$moUË`mhr n[añWVrV _mZdr à{VîR>oMr(Human dignity) hmZr hmoVm H$m_m Z o.

^maVr` X§S> g§{hVoZwgma ""AíbrbVm'' hr qbJ oX-ahrV Agbr nm{hOo. nU H$Xm{MV ^maVr`g_mOì`dñWo_Üò pñÌ`m `m ôX^mdm_Üò nydunmgyZgmnS>ë`m_wio Aem JmoîQ>tZm AmO hr ^maVr` g_mOì`dñWobm gm_moa§ Omd bmJV Amho.

A{YH$ _m{hVr - gm¡. lr{dÚm O`Hw$_ma^mfm§Va - lr. {_WwZ ~§gmoS>o


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

_amR>r_amR>r_amR>r_amR>r_amR>r

_amR>r hm ~mUm Am_Mm_amR>r Amho VmH$X Am_Mr_amR>r _YyZ OrdZ OJÊ`mgAmZ§X dmQ>Vmo H$moQ>çmZ§ H$moQ>r ...

d¡embr nmQ>rb àW_ {dYr

S>m oioS>m oioS>m oioS>m oioS>m oio

{VÀ`m _wŠ`m S>moiçm§_Ü o_r hadbmo Amho,{VMo S>moio _bm Pmony XoV Zmhr,Aä`mghr H$é XoV Zmhr,H$m` Pmbo Amho _bm,_mPoM _bm H$iV Zmhr

nmhÿZ {VÀ`m S>moiçm§V _r ñdV…bm{dgéZr`m Jobmo m OJmbm,AMmZH$!Vr _bm nmhÿZ IQ>çmi hgbrAm{U {VÀ`m gw§Xa S>moiçm§Zm nmhÿZ_bm hr H${dVm gwMbr

{dZmoX AOw©Z hQ>H$a {ÛVr` df© {dYr


Ag§»` àíZ àíZm§Mm CÐoH$ !nU àíZm§Zm g_OyZ KoVmV Vo "S>moio'Ÿ&&

ào_mMr ^mfm Á`m§Zm gd©àW_ C_OVoŸ&Vo S>moio, {dah Á`m§Zm H$iVmo Vo S>moio Ÿ&&

gmam Amg_§V Á`mV gm_mdbm AmhoŸ&Vo EH$m _y{V©_§V gw§XarMo S>moioŸ&&

Á`mbm G$Vw H$iVmo, AmO©d H$iVmoVo S>moio, Á`m§Zm gmam AmH$me emoYVmo Vo S>moio!

"`mMr Xohr mMr S>moim' Oo AZw dVmoVmo Amnë`m H$m|XUmV gmR>dyZ R>odVmo S>moimŸ&&

ào_mMr MmH$moar _moSy>Z AmH$membm JdgUrKmbVmo Vmo S>moimŸ&&

åhUyZM "ZoÌXmZ _hm XmZ' Ago åhUVmVVoM Iao! {_ÌmZm| Vwåhr OJ nm{hbV AmVmÁ`m§Zr Zmhr nm{hb Ë`m§Zm Va g§Yr Úm !!

g§Vmof {Jar {ÛVr` df© {dYr

H${dVm


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13


Amog§S>Vo S>moiçm_YyZ ào_ OoìhmAmog§S>VmV S>moiçm_YyZ Aly Ooìhm

XmoÝhrMm AW© EH$ AgVmoCamdaM AmoP AmnU WmoS>§ hbH$ H$aVmo !

S>moiçm§Mr mfm S>moiçm§Zm H$iVoAly§Mr mfm _Zmbm H$iVo

XmoKm§M _rbZ Ooìhm KS>VoOrdZmbm Zdr H$mV VoìhmM {_iVo.

_mohZ qZ~miH$a àW_ df© {dYr


gd© àW_ hiydma C_bVmV

Ago Vo ZmOyH$ S>moio Ÿ&&

g§nyU© {díd nmhVmV ho

gw§Xa S>moioŸ&&

Xw…ImV Aly JmiVmV

AmZ§Xm àg§Jr AmZ§Xmly

T>miVmV, hoM S>moioŸ&&

Z ~mobVm XoIrb Iyn H$mhr

gm§JwZ OmVmV H$Yrhr em§V

AgUmao ho S>moioŸ&&

g§Xrn Jw§Omb {ÛVr` df© {dYr


_ñVH$mÀ`m MaUr brZ XmoZ VmaoAmZ§X qH$dm Xw…ImV {^OyZ OmUmao OUy Pao

OJmMm Moham {XgVmo hçm§À`m ghmaonU Hw$énVm {XgVmM {_Q>VmV H$s {~Mmao

ào_, g§J, bmo {XgV§ hçm§À`m {H$Zmaohçm§À`mVyZM dmhVmV A{^_mZmMo dmao

_ZmVbr mdZm {ZgQ>Vo hçm§À`mM Ymao_J AgmoV bhmZgo qH$dm gwaHw$Vbobo Mohao

Á`m§À`mH$S>o Ago ho {Xì` Vo AmhoVZ{e~dmZnU Á`m§À`m R>mB© Zmhr ho................... ....... Ë`m§À`mgmR>r H$am ZoÌXmZ

g§Ho$V bobo{ÛVr` df© {dYr


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

àW_ df© {dYr {dÚmÏ`mªMr "R>mUo {Oëhm H$mamJ¥hmg e¡j{UH$ oQ>' - Ahdmb

- lr. A{Zb gy ©d§er, àW_ df©, {d{Y {dÚmWu

AmXaUr` àmMm`m© gm¡. lr{dÚm O`Hw$_ma Am{U àmÜ`mnH$ lr. d¡Ú ga `m§À`m _mJ©Xe©ZmZo {XZm§H$ 23/03/2013amoOr "àW_ df©' {dYr {dÚmÏ`mªZr Xwnmar 12.00 dmOVm "R>mUo _Ü`dVu H$mamJ¥hmg oQ> {Xbr. Vmo {Xdg ehrX {Xdg hmoVm.XoemH$[aVm ehrX Pmboë`m H«$m§VrH$maH$m§Zm A{^dmXZ d lÕm§Obr A{n©V H$aÊ`mMm AemM H«$m§VrH$maH$m§Zm A{^dmXZH$aÊ`mH$[aVm d e¡j{UH$ joÌ oQ> åhUyZ Amåhr gd© OU R>mUo _Ü`dVu H$mamJ¥hmg Jobmo hmoVmo. Ë`m oQ>rMm d¥Îmm§V Imbrbà_mUo

H$mamJ¥hmMm B{Vhmg :

H$mamJ¥hmMm B{Vhmg \$ma _moR>m Amho. nmoVw©JrOm§Zr gZ 1782 _Ü o hm {H$„m ~m§Ybm Ë`m doiog Ë`m§Zr R>mUo ehamg "S>r- VoZm' ho Zmd R>odbo hmoVo. B§J«Om§Zr `m {H$ëë`mda AmH«$_U Ho$bo. Ë`mZ§Va "_amR>çmZr' hm {H$„m qOHy$Z KoVbm Va nwÝhmB§J«Om§Zr `m {H$ëë`mda AmH«$_U Ho$bo. `m {H$ëë`mMo A§VJ©V ~m§YH$m_ Ho$bo `m_Ü o Ë`m§Zr S>ÝOZ (H$moR>S>r), A§S>mgobH¡$Úm§H$[aVm ~m§Ybo. `m Xoemda Ë`m§Mr hþHw$_V AgVmZm `mM H$mamJ¥hmV B.g.dr gZ 1910 _Ü o Ë`m§Zr Amnbo H«$m§VrH$maH$AZ§V H$mÝhoao, H$d}, Xoenm§S>o `m§Zm dYñV§ mda ZodyZ \$mer {Xbr hmoVr. Aem Eo{Vhm{gH$ dmñVyV Amåhr gdmªZr àdoe Ho$bmhmoVm.

Vwé§J A{YH$mar lr. E_. EM q_S>, lr. ^moH$ao, lr. JmoqdX nmQ>rb gmho~ Amåhm§ gdmªZm _m{hVr XoV hmoVo. _w»`XadmÁ`mVM EH$ H$m`m©b` d Ë`m§À`m g_moa ZdrZ oUmè`m H¡$Úm§Mr VgoM nmo{bg {enmB© `m§Mr Zm|X R>odUmao EH$ AmdH$ -OmdH$ a{OñQ>a R>odbobo hmoVo Ë`m_Ü o àË oH$ Zm|X H$arV hmoVo.

àdoeÛmam ~mhoa EH$ \$bI hmoVm Ë`mda nwT>rb à_mUo Zm|Xr hmoË`m.

H$ƒo H¡$Xr n o$ H¡$Xr ñWmZ~Õ naXoer nmoQ>m EHy$U bm. nÅ>r(ì`mYrZ) ({gÜXmof ~§Xr) H¡$Xr H¡$Xr

EHy$U EHy$U EHy$U EHy$U EHy$U

1845 185 03 309 02 2344 18

doJdoJio {d^º$ H$jm§Mr nmhUr :

Amåhr gd© OU S>mì`m ~mOyZo EH$ - EH$ "{d^º$' H$j nhmd`mg gwé Ho$bo hmoVo. Am_À`m gmo~V lr. q_S> dlr. nmQ>rb gmho~ àË oH$ H$jmMr _m{hVr XoV hmoVo.

EH$ "{d^º$ H$j' n{hbm Omo gd© ~mOyZo ~§{XñV hmoVm `m H$jm_Ü o Img H¡$Xr åhUOo XheVdmXr H¥$Ë` H$aUmao H¡$XrR>odÊ`mV oVmV. B§J«OmÀ`m H$mimV ~m§YÊ`mV Ambobm A§S>m gob hr gwa{jVoÀ`m H$maUmñVd ~mhoéZ nmhVm Ambm Ë`m eoOmar"H$mbm nmZr `mS>© XoIrb ~{KVbm `mZ§Va EH$m _moR>çm `mS>© _Yo Jobmo Ë`m `mS>m©V COì`m ~mOybm gbJ 12 H$moR>S>çm hmoË`m`mbm gob Xo{Ib åhUV. àË oH$ gob _Ü o Mma Vo nmM H¡$Xr H$m|S>bobo hmoVo. Ë`mVrb ~hþVoH$ H¡$Xr ~m§½bmXoer H¡$Xr hmoVo.

gm§ñH¥${VH$ ~§{XñV hm°b qH$dm g^mJ¥h : bmoI§S>r C§M C§M JOm§Zr ~m§Ybobm "gm§ñH¥${VH$ H$m ©H«$_mMm hm°b' nm{hbm.H¡$ÚmÀ`m _Zmoa§OZm H$[aVm Ë`mMm dmna hmoV hmoVm.

H¡$Úm§Mo ñd§ nmH$ J¥h : H¡$Úm§À`m amoOÀ`m OodUmH$arVm OodU V`ma hmoUmao ^bo _moR>o ñd§ nmH$ J¥h Amåhr nm{hbo.Ë`mV EH$mM doir 25 Vo 30 nmoù`m H$em ~Z{dë`m OmVmV VgoM H¡$ÚmMo OodU H$go ~ZVo Vo nhmd`mg {_imbo.


d

V V V V V

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13

ñd§ nmH$ KamV {eaë`mda S>mì`m ~mOybm H¡$Úm§Zm XoÊ`mV oUmam amoOMm Amhma {b{hbm hmoVm Vmo nwT>rb à_mUo

H$mamJ¥hmV {Xbm OmUmam Amhma

H$ƒo {eOdyZ gH$mi Xwnma

Ý`m`mb`rZ ~§Xr 150 J«°_ 400 J«°_ 200 J«°_ 200 J«°_

{ejm Pmbobo ~§Xr 200 J«°_ 500 J«°_ 250 J«°_ 250 J«°_

Jhÿ nrR> Amobm Jmoim gH$mi

Ý`m`mb`rZ ~§Xr 300 J«°_ 450 J«°_ 2 MnmVr 2 MnmVr 170 Vo 180 J«°_

{ejm Pmbobo ~§Xr 350 J«°_ 525 J«°_ 3 MnmVr 3 MnmVr

S>mi _gya ^mOr - XyYr, ~Q>mQ>m, H$m§Xm, Q>m°_oQ>mo

darb gd© Amhma J«°_ Zwgma Amho H$s Zmhr VnmgyZM _J Vo H¡$ÚmZm {Xbo OmVo

{Xem g§JUH$ à{ejU H|$Ð : `m H$mamJ¥hmV Amåhm§bm g§JUH$ à{ejU H|$Ð AmT>iyZ Ambo hmoVo.

pìh{S>Amo H$m°Ý\$aÝgr gw{dYm : A_o[aH$m d BVa àJa Xoem§Mr AmYw{ZH$ IQ>bm MmbdÊ`mgmMr nÕVr àW_V :R>mÊ`mVrb `m H$mamJ¥hmV gwé H$aÊ`mV Ambr hmoVr Am{U _w»` åhUOo `m gw{dYmMo CX²KmQ>Z Am_À`m gmo~V AgUmaoAmXaUr` àmÜ`mnH$ lr. d¡Ú ga `m§À`m hñVo Pmbo ho EoHy$Z Amåhm§ gdmªZm AmZ§X Pmbm.

pìh{S>Amo H$m°Ý\$aÝgr åhUOo H¡$Úmda H$mamJ¥hmVM Ë`mbm R>odyZ Ý`m`mb`mV IQ>bm Mmb{dVm oVmo.

Ý`m`m{Ye _hmamO d Ë`mMo d{H$b Ë`mÀ`mer ñH«$sZda g§dmX gmYy eH$VmV. Ë`mbmgwÕm Ý`m`mb`mVrb gd© KQ>ZmH$mamJ¥hmVM {XgVmV. `m_wio H¡$Úm§Zm ZoÊ`mMm d naV AmUUo `mVrb doi H$_r Pmbm.

H$mnS> JmoXm_ … ZdrZ H¡$Úm§H$[aVm H$nS>o d OwZo H¡$Xr Á`m§Mr {ejm nyU© Pmbr Ë`m§Mo H$nS>o O_m H$éZ KoUo, `mMo JmoXm_nm{hbo `m JmoXm_m~mhoa EH$m nmQ>rda EH$ g§Xoe hmoVm.

""H$mamJma go A~ ~mha OmZm h¡Ÿ& bm¡Q>Ho$ {\$a go dmng Zhr AmZm h¡Ÿ& ~Xbm Zm bmoŸ& ~XbH$a {XImAmoŸ&''

{d^ŠV H$j H«$. 3 … hm H$j Oo nmo{bg A{YH$mar H$_©Mmar `m§À`mda Amamon nÌ R>odyZ Á`m§Zm doJdoJiçm {ejmPmboë`m AmhoV Ë`mMm hm Amho. `m H$jmV gwà{gÕ MH$_H$ {deof nmo{bg A{YH$mar lr. àXrn e_m© `mZm R>odÊ`mV AmbohmoVo.

§dYñV§^

Amåhr gd© OUm§Zr Vmo dYñV§ nm{hbm hmoVm. Á`m ñV§ mda B§J«Om§Mm `m XoemV A_b AgVm§Zm Á`m H«$m§VrH$maH$m§Zm gZ1910 _Ü o \$mer XoÊ`mV Ambr hmoVr. Ë`m H«$m§VrH$maH$m§Mo Zmd hmoVo H«$m§VrH$maH$ AZ§V H$mÝhoao, H$d}, Xoenm§S>o. m dYñV§ mH$S>oOmÊ`mH$arVm Amåhr EH$m N>moQ>çmem XadmOmVyZ AmV {eabmo. C§M ^mJmH$S>o Amåhr gd© dYñV§^mH$S>o Jobmo. A{YjH$lr. q_S>o gmho~m§Zr dYñV§ mMr _mhrVr {Xbr.

XoemH$aVm Oo bT>bo Vo A_a hþVmË_o Pmbo


d

V V V V Vid

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

idhi

jna

2012

- 20

13id

hijn

a 20

12 -

2013

Ë`m§Mo ho ~{bXmZ, XoemH$arVm g_n©UmMr Ë`m§Mr Vr ^mdZm, Vmo B{Vhmg OUy S>moiçmg_moa C^m amhrbm. Xoem~ÔbOmÁdë` A{^_mZ AgUmè`m, XoemH$arVm hgV hgV \$mgmda OmUmè`m Ë`m VrZ H«$m§VrH$maH$m§Zm Amåhr _Zmo_Zr lÕm§ObrA{n©V H$éZ nwT>o {ZKmbmo hmoVmo. Ë`m dYñV§ mMr AmH¥$Vr nwT>rb à_mUo

H¡$Úm§Mo hm°pñnQ>b … H$mamJ¥hmVM H¡$Úm§H$[aVm hm°pñnQ>b hmoVo. Á`m {R>H$mUr AmOmar H¡$Úm§Mr "gwlwfm' Ho$br OmV hmoVr.Ë`m§À`mH$arVm "g_wnoXeZ' H|$ÐgwÕm nm{hbo.

"H$maImZm {d^mJ' H$m`m©b` … [aH$må`m hmVmZm H$m_ XoÊ`mH$[aVm "CÚmoJ d ì`dgm`mMo _mJ©Xe©Z' H$mamJ¥hmV Ho$boOmVo. Agm "H$maImZm {d^mJ' Amåhr nm{hbm. amH$Q> hmVm§Zr gw§Xa bmH$S>mÀ`m àVrH¥$Vr CXm. ~¡bJmS>r, {d_mZ, BVa AZoH$dñVy nm{hë`m.

~oH$ar d \$agmU {d^mJ … ehamVrb hm°pñnQ>b, BVa H$mamJ¥h d g§ñWmZm§H$arVm ~oH$arMo nXmW© gd© `m {R>H$mUr H¡$XrCÎm_ àH$mao ~Z{dV hmoVo.

oQ>rMr gm§JVm d Am^ma àXe©Z … gd© H$mamJ¥h nmhÿZ Amåhr _w»` XadmÁ`mOdi Ambmo d AmOÀ`m åhUOoM Ë`m{XdgmÀ`m oQ>rMr gm§JVm Pmbr hmoVr. gd© H$_©Mmar, ghmæ`H$ Vwé§J A{YjH$ d _w»` A{YjH$ lr. q_S>o gmho~ `m§Mo Am^malr. A{Zb gy ©d§er `m§Zr _mZbo. VgoM Amåhm§bm _mJ©Xe©Z H$aUmao lr. d¡Ú ga d Am_Mm {_Ì Hw$. g_mYmZ H$merX Á`mZogam§gmo~V Vwé§J oQ>rÀ`m ì`dñWoV Cñ\w$V© gh^mJ KodyZ Am`moOZ Ho$bo Ë`mMo hr _Znyd©H$ Am^ma _mZÊ`mV Ambo hmoVo.

{dYr _hm{dÚmb`mMo d àmMm © lr_Vr {dÚm O`Hw$_ma _°S>_Mo hr Am^ma _mZÊ`mV Ambo hmoVo.

_w»` Vwé§J A{YH$mar `m§Mr OmVm OmVm oQ> … _w»` Vwé§J A{YH$mar lr. w. Q>r. ndma gmho~m§Mr Ë`m§À`m H$jmVOmdyZ oQ> KoVbr hmoVr. Ë`mdoiog Ë`m§Zr Amåhm§bm nwT>rb dmQ>MmbrgmR>r ew oÀN>m {Xë`m hmoË`m d ho hr gm§{JVbo hmoVo H$s hm{dYr ì`dgm` H$arV AgVmZm gm_m{OH$ G$U, OmUrd `m§Mr OmU R>odyZ g_mO H$ë`mU d Jmoa J[a~m§Zm _mo\$V Ý`m` {_idyZXoÊ`mH$arVm PQ>mdo.

VPM’S TMC LAW COLLEGE, THANEVPM's TMC Law College d 65 d V idhijna 2012 - 2013 VPM’S TMC LAW...

Documents

Transcript of VPM’S TMC LAW COLLEGE, THANEVPM's TMC Law College d 65 d V idhijna 2012 - 2013 VPM’S TMC LAW...