ตอนที่ 6 - tumcivil.com · เนื่องจาก C.G. ของ pile cap และ C.G. ของเสาเข็มอยู่ใกล้กัน ดังนั้นจึง
Verification Data (Spatial and Weight) Unguided MK66 Weight = 23.4 lbs. (7.14 lbs fuel) Length = 55...
-
Upload
eleanor-shepherd -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
1
Transcript of Verification Data (Spatial and Weight) Unguided MK66 Weight = 23.4 lbs. (7.14 lbs fuel) Length = 55...
Verification Data(Spatial and Weight)
Unguided MK66
• Weight = 23.4 lbs. (7.14 lbs fuel)
• Length = 55 in.
• x (c.g.) = 30 in.
• y (c.g.) = 0.0 in.
• z (c.g.) = .002
Guided MK66
• Weight = 34.4 lbs. Max
• Length = 79.7 in. Max
• Center of Gravity
- Move Aft
- Decrease Yaw Rate on Missile
- Remain Neutral in y & z
Verification Data(Performance)
Consideration #1: Design to sustain Max g’s.
• Mechanical – stress concentrations on moving parts (i.e. canards)
• Electrical – tracking, servo response
•SL-MTI DC Servomotor
•MIL spec, designed for missile fin actuation
G Load vs. Time
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
Time (s)
G's
(g
)
Max G’s: 64.8g
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4Time, s
G-L
oad
G-LOAD TREND FOR HYDRA MISSILE SERIES WITH AND WITHOUT AVIONICS MODULE
G-Load W/ Maximum Avionics Module Weight (7.3 lbs)
G-Load for Unmodified Hydra Missile
Guided Max G’s: 80g
Consideration #2: Design to sustain max jerk.
• Jerk is the rate of change of acceleration
• Commonly called pulse, impulse, shock, bounce, or jolt
• Important when evaluating destructive force on components
Jerk vs. Time
-400000
-300000
-200000
-100000
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
Time (s)
Jerk
(m
/s^
3)
Max. Jerk: 291,786.7 m/s^3
Consideration #3: Thrust and Engine Burn-out
• Engine burns out at 1.2 seconds
• Max thrust occurs at .965 seconds
• Burn-out corresponds to approx. horizontal distance of 317m (4000m range)
Thrust vs. Time
01000200030004000
50006000700080009000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
Time (sec)
Thru
st (N
)
Max. Thrust: 8142 N
Plans for Progress1. Begin programming/simulation with Datcom
• Upsides
• Multiple Inputs
• Simple Programming (Dos-Prompted)
• Calculates Aerodynamic Forces on Missile and automatically generates plots
• Downsides
• Doesn’t model canards accurately at supersonic speeds
• 125 input lines vs. 26,000 output lines
Plans for Progress2. Solid Modeling of Missile (ProE Wildfire)
•Will depict areas of stress concentrations
•Spatial Considerations
•Material Selection
Plans for Progress3. Obtain Aerospace Blockset (Mathworks)
• Inputs:
•Aerodynamic Coefficients
•Dynamic Pressure
•Center of Gravity (CG)
•Center of Pressure
• Outputs:
•Aerodynamic Forces at CG (Drag, Lift)
•Aerodynamic Moments at CG
Aerospace Blockset Screenshot
Processor Solution - Altera
• Provides flexible I/O interfaces for purposes of acquiring GPS and IMU data
• Re-programmable if solution is not optimal according to design
• Have contact information within Altera
Why not M68K?
• No included/implicit interfacing without BIOS support
• No hardware multiplier support
• FPGA allows greater configuration flexibility than fixed-core CPU
Why not LabView?
• Proprietary FPGA solution requires PCI bus – not feasible for use inside a missile
• Possible overhead involved in using LabView as programming language instead of VHDL
• We already have Altera development software
Processor State Diagram