Vehicle Technologies Program - UMTRI - University of Michigan

13
Vehicle Technologies Program Focus on the Future Transportation Research Conference Patrick B. Davis Vehicle Technologies Program Manager

Transcript of Vehicle Technologies Program - UMTRI - University of Michigan

Page 1: Vehicle Technologies Program - UMTRI - University of Michigan

Program Name or Ancillary Text eere.energy.gov

Vehicle Technologies Program

Focus on the FutureTransportation Research Conference

Patrick B. DavisVehicle Technologies Program Manager

Page 2: Vehicle Technologies Program - UMTRI - University of Michigan

Vehicle Technologies Program eere.energy.gov

The Changing DOE / Auto Industry Relationship

Pre - 2008• Largely an R&D role focused on spurring innovation. Also supported regulatory actions

– Activity predates formation of DOE in 1977– Partnerships: PNGV, FreedomCAR and Fuel Partnership– R&D that helps identify regulatory limits

2008 and Beyond• Key Responsibilities added

– R&D Budget increased 75%– $25B Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) Loan Program– Recovery Act: $2.8B in grants supporting manufacturing and vehicle/infrastructure demonstration– ARPA-e– Loan Guarantee Program

Page 3: Vehicle Technologies Program - UMTRI - University of Michigan

Vehicle Technologies Program eere.energy.gov

U.S. Petroleum Production and Consumption, 1970-2035

U.S. Vehicle Market• 240 million vehicles on the road• Approximately 9M new cars & light trucks for 2009. Average is 15.7 M/yr 2002-2007• Hybrid vehicles now ~3% of sales• 13 Million cars and light trucks taken out of use per year• 11.5 Million barrels of oil per day consumed by on-road vehicles

Page 4: Vehicle Technologies Program - UMTRI - University of Michigan

Vehicle Technologies Program eere.energy.gov

0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

0.040

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Ref SI

Adv

 SI

Adv

 CI

SI HEV

SI PHEV10

SI PHEV40

CI HEV

CI PHEV10

CI PHEV40

FC HEV EV

E85 HEV

E85 

PHEV10

E85 

PHEV40

Petroleu

m Con

sumption (gal gasoline‐eq

 / mi)

Lifecycle GHG emission

s (g CO2 eq

 / m

i)

GHG Emissions and Petroleum Consumption by Vehicle Technology

GHG Emissions  (g CO2‐eq / mi) Petroleum Consumption (gal  gas‐eq / mi)

50% reductionfromreferencevehicle GHG emissions:

215 g CO2eq /mi

Referencevehicle GHG emissions:

430 g CO2eq /mi

Analysis Informs Strategy

Vehicle GHG emissions fall into 3 major groups:• Conventional

• Electric‐drive

• Combination electric‐drive + biofuel

Petroleum consumption loosely mirrors GHG emissions

Vehicle GHG emissions fall into 3 major groups:• Conventional

• Electric‐drive

• Combination electric‐drive + biofuel

Petroleum consumption loosely mirrors GHG emissions

Page 5: Vehicle Technologies Program - UMTRI - University of Michigan

Vehicle Technologies Program eere.energy.gov

Mission, Goals, Targets & Budget

Distribution of Funding

Efficiency reduces oil use and CO2 emissions

Federal 2%

Industry 34%

OEMs 2%

National Labs 49%

University 3%

Consortia 10%

Mission: Develop clean highway transportation technologies to enable America to use less petroleum and lower greenhouse gas emissions

-1-

Vehicle Technologies Budget Trend

311267

208184

0

100

200

300

FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10

Mill

ion

Dol

lars

325

FY11 Request

Page 6: Vehicle Technologies Program - UMTRI - University of Michigan

Vehicle Technologies Program eere.energy.gov

Hybrid-Electric Systems

Petroleum Displacement through Fuel Substitution and Improved EfficiencyGoal: 1 Million PHEVs by 2015

Status and Targets2009 Status Targets

2014 PHEV: $300 / kWhr2015 PEEM: Cost for elec. traction system no greater than $12/kW peak by 2015

Status: $800-$1000 / kWhrStatus: Current cost of the electric traction system is $40/kW

Types of Vehicles and Benefits

EV

PHEV

HEV

Nissan Leaf

Toyota Prius

Chevy Volt

All Electric

50 MPG

~100 MPGe

• Cell materials & fabrication represents about 3/4 the cost for PHEV batteries

• For significant cost reduction, new materials with increased energy density are needed to reduce: - material needs- cell count, and- cell/pack hardware

Battery Cost Reduction

-4-

$ / k

Whr

Page 7: Vehicle Technologies Program - UMTRI - University of Michigan

Vehicle Technologies Program eere.energy.gov

Increasing engine efficiency is one of the most cost-effective approaches to increasing fuel economy

Benefits All Vehicle Classes

Advanced Combustion Engine R&D

Heavy-Duty

Light-Duty

Class 2b-8

Cars

Trucks

Targets2015 Passenger Vehicle: Improve gasoline vehicle fuel economy by 25% and diesel vehicle fuel economy by 40%; compared to 2009 baseline2015 Commercial Engine: Improve commercial engine efficiency by more than 20%; compared to 2009 baseline

“Support improved mileage performance of internal combustion engines…” – Secretary of Energy Steven Chu

25-40% Improvement

Up to 50%Improvement

2015 HEV & PHEV Improvements:Could provide >70 MPG HEV

Advanced Combustion Regimes (HCCI / low temp combustion)

R&D Focus

Emissions Control Technologies

Waste Heat Recovery – Mechanical and Thermoelectric Devices

• Diesel-like efficiency• Complex combustion modeling• Computational fluid dynamics engine models

• Improve NOx catalyst conversion efficiency• Develop on-board diagnostics and sensors

• Increase practical conversion efficiency

• Increase durability

-5-

Page 8: Vehicle Technologies Program - UMTRI - University of Michigan

Vehicle Technologies Program eere.energy.gov

Advanced & Alternative Fuels

Direct Displacement of Petroleum and Enabling Advanced Engine TechnologyEthanol “Blend Wall” is approximately 11-15 billion gallons per year with E10

2009 Status Targets2011 Target: Have answer on viability of E15 and B20 2022 Target:Attainment of RFS II mandate – 36 B gallons/year

2009: Intermediate blends testing on-track to finish 2010.2009: Approximately 10.5 billion gallons of renewables used

R&D Focus

E85 Optimized FFV Engines – Increase use of E85 by decreasing the fuel economy penalty of ethanol

•Durability, driveability, and materials compatibility for vehicles, small engines, and infrastructure

•Eliminate half of energy content penalty by taking advantage of higher octane

•Utilizing turbo-charging, variable valve timing, direct injection, and compression ratio increase to achieve 15% increase in fuel efficiency with E85

-6-

Performance of legacy vehicles on intermediate ethanol blends

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

850

900

950

E0 E10 E15 E20

Exha

ust P

ort T

empe

ratu

re (C

)

HondaGenerator

HondaGenerator(used)Briggs andStrattonGeneratorKohlerGenerator

Stihl LineTrimmer

PoulanBlower

New EngineTrendline

No

E15

data

for u

sed

Hon

da

Page 9: Vehicle Technologies Program - UMTRI - University of Michigan

Vehicle Technologies Program eere.energy.gov

22.5 17 10.5

22.517

10.5

38.544

50.5

16.5 22 28.5

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Baseline 75% 50%

Materials DevelopmentVehicle lightweighting is one of the most cost effective ways of reducing fuel consumption resulting in a

6-8% improvement in fuel economy with every 10% reduction in vehicle weightTypes of Materials and Benefits

Magnesium

Carbon Fiber

25-35% Lighter than a Aluminum Engine Block

50-60% Lighter than a Standard Steel Body in White

Targets and Status2009 Status:Modeling demonstrated that body and chassis weight reduction goal of 40% could be achieved, but not at cost parity.

2010 Target:Cost-effectivelyreduce the weight of passenger vehicle body and chassis by 50% in high volume applications compared to 2002 vehicles.

Other

Powertrain

Chassis

Body

Body/Chassis Weight Reduction of 50% Possible

Weight Reduction

• Through weight decompounding only 20-25% of primary weight reduction required

• Key Materials: Carbon fiber, Mg alloys, high strength steel

** Hypothetical Distribution

Weight Decompounding is an iterative solution: Lower overall weight reduces the engine size required, which in turn reduces weight, which in turn allows the vehicle structure to be reduced, etc.

-7-

Page 10: Vehicle Technologies Program - UMTRI - University of Michigan

Vehicle Technologies Program eere.energy.gov

Outreach and Deployment

Since 1987, DOE has sponsored more than two dozen university-level competitions, providing engineering students an opportunity to conduct

Graduate Automotive Training EducationEight Centers of Excellence

University of California-Davis, Virginia Tech, Pennsylvania State University, The Ohio State University, University of Michigan-Dearborn, University of Tennessee, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana, University of Alabama-Birmingham

Improving the speed and scale of market penetration for alternative fuel vehicles and infrastructure

Focus• Petroleum & Emissions Reduction• Vehicles and Infrastructure• Education and Outreach• Economic Opportunities

Unique Assets• Local Strategy Advances Nat. Goal• Coordinators• Coalitions• Technical Information/Resources

www.fueleconomy.govhttp://www.afdc.energy.gov/afdc/

Providing a new generation of engineers with knowledge/skills in

advanced vehicle technologiesAdvanced Vehicle Competitions

hands-on research and development. EcoCAR has 17 teams pursuing a variety of advanced vehicle technologies

-9-

Page 11: Vehicle Technologies Program - UMTRI - University of Michigan

Vehicle Technologies Program eere.energy.gov

Recovery Act : $2.8 Billionwww.recovery.gov

$1.5 Billion in funding to accelerate the manufacturing and deployment of the next generation of U.S. batteries

$500 Million in funding for electric-drive components manufacturing

$400 Million in funding for transportation electrificationRecovery Act will fund 48 new projects in advanced battery and electric drive components manufacturing and electric drive vehicle deployment in over 20 states

SuperTruck and Advanced Combustion R&D $104.4 Million Solicitation

- Demonstrate a 50% improvement in freight efficiency by 2015 in Class 8, long haul trucks

Facilities and Equipment Upgrade up to $105 Million: User Centers, offer expert staff and unique equipment capabilities that no one industrial entity can afford to maintain.

Clean Cities: Petroleum Displacement through Alt Fuel Vehicles and Expanded Alternative Fuel Infrastructure

Page 12: Vehicle Technologies Program - UMTRI - University of Michigan

Vehicle Technologies Program eere.energy.gov

Summary: $25B in direct loans available to auto and components manufacturers for the cost of re-equipping, expanding, or establishing manufacturing facilities in the US to produce qualified advanced technology vehicles (ATVs) or components. Still accepting applications.

Gen 2

12

Eligibility Requirements

General Eligibility

• Must locate manufacturing facilities (and eligible engineering integration) in the U.S. • Must relate costs to reequipping, expanding, or establishing a manufacturing facility

Vehicles • Must meet 125% of mpg in 2005 for “substantially similar vehicles”• Must meet Bin 5 Tier II emissions standards and any new particulate standard

Components• Must be specifically designed for installation in qualifying ATVs• Must contribute to the qualifying ATV’s performance requirements

Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing Loan Program

Timeline Highlights$25B appropriated for EISA 2007§136 9/30/08Interim Final Rule published in Federal Register 11/05/08$8B awarded in first 3 loans (Ford, Nissan, Tesla) 6/23/09$500M awarded in 4th loan (Fisker) 9/22/09$24M awarded for components in 5th loan (Tenneco) 10/27/09

Page 13: Vehicle Technologies Program - UMTRI - University of Michigan

Vehicle Technologies Program eere.energy.gov

For More Information

www.vehicles.energy.gov

Patrick Davis, Program ManagerVehicle Technologies