Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

34
VANITY METRICS Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Transcript of Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Page 1: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

VANITY METRICS

Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and

what to do about it

Page 2: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

What you will learn in the next 15 min

Vanity metrics

How we got into this mess

What do to about it:

Low Carb &

Blood Lipid Panels

Page 3: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Vanity Metrics “They might make you feel good, but they don’t offer clear guidance for what to do”

Eric Ries

Page 4: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Lean Startup –

Eric Ries Startup Bible of silicon

valley

Page 5: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Example

vanity metric actionable metric

website “Hits”

How many people have

visited my website?

What do I learn?

A/B split test

group A

group B: 20% more

revenue

Go with design B =>

more revenue

Page 6: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

What has this got to

do with Doctors?

Page 7: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Surrogate Markers

In clinical trials, a surrogate endpoint (or

marker) is a measure of effect of a specific

treatment that may correlate with a real

clinical endpoint but does not necessarily

have a guaranteed relationship

Page 8: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Instead of monitoring heart disease risk, studies monitor

„surrogate markers‟

Startups/Business Medicine

vanity metric

actionable metric

surrogate marker

cholesterol

clinical endpoint

heart disease

all-cause mortality

Page 10: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Example

Although observational studies might suggest a simplistic hypothesis for [HDL] […] cholesterol, that increasing the levels pharmacologically would […] reduce cardiovascular events […] substantial trials of these three agents do not support this concept.

We cannot judge health effects of pharmaceutical agents on their effect on so-called surrogate markers [e.g. HDL] such a cholesterol levels. The only important thing is their effect on overall health [e.g. mortality]

July 2014

http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g4379

Page 11: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

How did we get in this cholesterol

mess?

Page 12: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Nikolai Nikolajewitsch Anitschkow

Page 13: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Test subjects

St Petersburg, 1913

On experimental cholesterol steatosis and

its significance in the origin of some

pathological processes by N. Anitschkow

and S. Chalatow photo: Tomi Tapio K

Page 14: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Cholesterol + Fat = Heart disease

Ancel Keys

1953 – “Six Country Study”

1961 – Time Magazine Cover

“Eat a low saturated fat diet”

Page 15: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

September 24, 1955

President Dwight D.

Eisenhower

Heart attack with the low Total

Cholesterol of 165 ml/dL

Page 16: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Dwight D. Eisenhower

Eisenhower was ordered to eat dry toast [..] for breakfast and eat only 1 egg per week. His cholesterol continued to climb on a low fat, low cholesterol diet until it reached 259 the day he left office. Eisenhower had several more heart attacks and eventually died of heart disease.

Page 17: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Linking it together

A nation in shock

7 countries study

Eating cholesterol => high cholesterol

1984: The Lipid Research Clinics

Coronary Primary Prevention Trial

Results

Page 18: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

The risk of death

from all causes

was only slightly

and not

significantly

reduced

Page 19: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Cholesterol

Essential structural

component of cell

membranes

Precursor for

biosynthesis of

Steroid hormones

Bile acid

Vitamin D

Page 20: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Cholesterol

Typical body production (Male, 68kg) =

1000mg

Typical dietary intake = 300mg (23%)

Page 21: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Cholesterol

Changing your diet (23% of cholesterol)

will not have a huge influence on your

Cholesterol

Eating Eggs is healthy

Rong Y, et al. Egg consumption and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: dose-response meta-analysis of

prospective cohort studies. British Medical Journal, 2013.

Fernandez ML. Dietary cholesterol provided by eggs and plasma lipoproteins in healthy populations. Current

Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care, 2006.

Blesso CN, et al. Whole egg consumption improves lipoprotein profiles and insulin sensitivity to a greater extent

than yolk-free egg substitute in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Metabolism, 2013.

Page 22: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

LCHF Diet

More usage of fat as energy source

(ketones)

Body prefers saturated fats => uses them

as preferred fuel

LDL (“bad cholesterol”) is mostly „large

fluffy“ (good)

Page 24: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

My Values

TC 273 | HDL 69 | LDL 192 | TG 62

Page 25: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

This is what my doctor sees

Total cholesterol 273

(goal < 200)

LDL cholesterol (calculated) 192

(goal < 160)

Page 26: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

This is what my doctor sees

Total cholesterol 273

(goal < 200)

LDL cholesterol (calculated) 192

(goal < 160)

Page 27: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

LDL calculated Friedewald (1972)

LDL = TC – HDL – (TG / 5)

Formula to calculate LDL

Cut-off for people with triglycerides > 400 mg/dl

SVA Vienna cut-off > 300 mg/dl

New Formulas (if your TG < 100 mg/dl)

Ahmadi (2008) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18426324

LDL (mg/dl) = TC/1.19 + TG/1.9 – HDL/1.1 – 38

de Cordova (2013) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23108766

LDL = 3/4 (TC - HDL)

Page 28: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Friedewald Formula

From 1972: Triglycerides (TG) must be <400

SVA (my insurance): TG <250

Low Carb (TG < ~100): Dr. William Davies “Friedewald equation relied on […] the assumption that the amount of triglycerides and cholesterol in ALL LDL particles was the same. In those of us following a wheat-free diet with limited exposure to junk carbohydrates, the triglyceride content of LDL particles is much lower, making the Friedewald equation invalid.”

http://www.wheatbellyblog.com/2012/12/cholesterol-belly/

Page 29: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

My LDL Math (<160) TC 273 | HDL 69 | LDL 192 | TG 62

Friedewald

192 mg/dl

Ahmadi

161 mg/dl

Cordova

153 mg/dl

Page 30: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

My LDL Math (<160) TC 273 | HDL 69 | LDL 157 | TG 62

Friedewald

192 mg/dl

Ahmadi

161 mg/dl

Cordova

153 mg/dl

Page 31: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Do I have other risk factors

European Cardiology Society Guidelines

SCORE Value => http://www.heartscore.org/

Newer Risk Assessment

TG/HDL ratio (<2,5 men, <3,5 women) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24402298

Page 32: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Heartscore.org

Page 33: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Low Risk: TG / HDL < 2.5

TC 273 | HDL 69 | LDL 157 | TG 62

62 / 69 = 0,89

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24402298

Page 34: Vanity Metrics - Why your doctor learned to read your blood panel wrong and what to do about it

Conclusion (*IANAD + I do not play one on TV *)

If you are Low Carb (i.e. have low TG):

Calculate your own LDL with de Cordova

LDL = TC/1.19 + TG/1.9 – HDL/1.1 – 38

Check your heartscore.org

TG / HDL

< 2,5 for men

< 3,5 for women

Questions: @khbites [email protected]