Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale...

19
Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants Heather Hills and Cosette Stark Deputy Executive Officers, Countywide Planning and Development Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority November 14, 2012

Transcript of Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale...

Page 1: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Vancouver Delegation Briefing

Los Angeles CountyTransportation Revenue InitiativesDavid YaleManaging Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants

Heather Hills and Cosette StarkDeputy Executive Officers, Countywide Planning and Development Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

November 14, 2012

Page 2: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Measure R (2008) Imagine Campaign

2

Page 3: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Measure R (2008) Fact Sheet

3

Page 4: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Economic Impacts

• 500,000 new jobs

• $83.9 billion in economic output (measured by business revenues)

• $30.6 billion in earnings for jobs created

• Over $9.2 billion in tax revenues, at the Federal, State, County and local levels 4

Measure R Value and Benefits

Environmental Impacts

• 191 million vehicle miles travelled reduced annually

• 522,000 pounds of emissions reduced annually

• 9.4 million gallons of gasoline saved annually

Page 5: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Measure R – Passed by 38,000 Votes in November 2008

5

Page 6: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

6

The Goal for Los Angeles County :Deliver 30 Year Measure R Program in 10 Years

• Complete 12 transit projects in 10 years• Create 160,000 jobs• Eliminate 522,000 lbs of

carbon emissions every day

• Reduce vehicle miles traveled by 191 million

• Increase transit boardings by 77 million

• Seek to accelerate 15 highway projects• Create 256,000 jobs • Relieve Congestion

Countywide

Page 7: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Measure R Extension Strategic Financial Plan Alternatives Considered

7

$4.61 $4.56 $5.48 $4.94

$3.18

$8.38

$3.49 $6.03 $1.19

$4.20 $2.19

$3.97

$2.07 $2.07 $2.12 $2.12

$-

$2

$4

$6

$8

$10

$12

$14

$16

$18

Large Grant Large Loan @ 2.17% Measure R Extension Preferred Strategy

Fallback Strategy

Alternative 30/10 Funding Strategies(Dollars in Billions)

New Starts Grants Gap TIFIA Loans Measure R Borrowing Other State, Local & Federal

Gap Assumes Measure R extension

Page 8: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

8

TIFIA Funding Increased under MAP-21

$122 $122 $750 $1,000 $1,200 $1,200

$7,500

$10,000

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13

SAFETEA-LU MAP-21

$ in

mill

ions

Credit Subsidy/Loss Reserve Loan Capacity

Page 9: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Measure R Revenues

LACMTA Senior Debt Service

LACMTA Subordinate Debt

Service

TIFIA MCA Parity with Prior TIFIA

New Projects (Crenshaw Project Corp.)

LACMTA

TIFIA Allows Full Subordination of Loan

9

• Revenues remaining after payment of debt obligations are released to LACMTA.

Springing Lien

Requirements:• 33% participation

– At Master Credit Agreement or Project level?

• “A” Rated, maximum 10% credit subsidy

• Non-project related revenue only

– No tolls

Page 10: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Measure R Highway & TransitRevenue and Interest Cost

10

Page 11: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Preferred Strategic Financial Plan by Funding Source

11

Other- State, Local & Federal- $5.5 B

Measure R Base-$5.6 B

Prior TIFIA-$1.2 B

Additional TIFIA-$3.0 B

$-

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Fiscal Year

Measure R Extension Accelerated Expenditure PlanFunding by Source - October 2012

(Dollars in Millions)

Total Transit Projects Cost-$15.3 B

Page 12: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Measure J Fact Sheet

12

Page 13: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Opposition to Measure J

13

Page 14: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Opposition to Measure J

14

Page 15: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Measure J Results as of Nov. 7, 2012

15

Page 16: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Measure R Results in 2008

16

Page 17: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Change from Measure R to Measure J

17

Page 18: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Lessons Learned

18

• Measure R’s success• Metro “brand”• Substantial support• Optimal outreach

• Measure J’s 65% “failure”– Opposed by some Board members– Lost by 2 percentage points

• Consensus is possible• Coalition is necessary• Champion is needed• Support of full Board of Directors is

needed

Page 19: Vancouver Delegation Briefing Los Angeles County Transportation Revenue Initiatives David Yale Managing Executive Officer, Planning, Programming, and Grants.

Preliminary Needs

Updated/Revised Lists

Updates to Final List

Yes No

LRTP Strategic

LRTP Funded

COG Input Ballot Development

Project Development Input Process for Long Range Plan/Ballot Initiative

Mobility MatrixNow – Feb 2015

Develop COG Ballot Priorities(Mar – Jun 2015)

Develop COG Ballot PrioritiesMar 2015 – May 2016

• Sub-Regional Needs• Sub-Regional Goals• Sub-Regional Projects* and

Priorities

• Update/Revise Projects Based on Initial Polling

• Refine Sub-Regional Projects• Assist with Development of

Financial Plan and Ordinance• Hold Metro Executive Team

Quarterly Meetings

* “Projects” refers to projects & programs

Preliminary Project List Development

Aug 2014 – Feb 2015

Initial PollingJan 2015

Update Project Costs & Schedules

Feb – Mar 2015

Project List & Financial PlanMar – Jun 2015

Update Projects if NeededJul 2015 – Feb 2016

Final PollingMar 2016

Board Action on OrdinanceMay 2016

Ballot ElectionNov 2016

Other Stakeholders

Other Stakeholders

Other Stakeholders