Van der Waals equation on a nuclear scale · 2021. 2. 5. · Van der Waals equation...
Transcript of Van der Waals equation on a nuclear scale · 2021. 2. 5. · Van der Waals equation...
Van der Waals equation on a nuclear scale
Volodymyr Vovchenko
Acknowledgements toD. Anchishkin, M. Gorenstein, R. Poberezhnyuk, and H. Stoecker
FIGSS Seminar
FIAS, Frankfurt25 April 2016
HGS-HIReHelmholtz Graduate School for Hadron and Ion Research
1 / 25
Outline
1 Introduction
2 Generalizations of Van der Waals equationGrand Canonical EnsembleQuantum statistics
3 ApplicationsCritical fluctuationsNuclear matter as VDW gas of nucleonsInteracting pion gas with van der Waals equationVan der Waals interactions in Hadron Resonance Gas
4 Summary
2 / 25
Strongly interacting matter
Protons and neutrons interact via strong forceNot elementary, composed of quarks, interaction mediated by gluonsTheory: Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
Tempe
rature
net-baryon density0
Tc
nuclei
hadron gas
Quark Gluon Plasma
Big bang
neutron stars
nucleon gas
Heavy Ion Collisions
ScalesLength: 1 fm = 10−15 m = 10−5 AEnergy: 100 MeV = 1010 times room T
Where is it relevant?Early universeNeutron starsHeavy-ion collisions (laboratory!)
First principles of QCD are rather established,but direct calculations are problematic
Phenomenological tools are very useful3 / 25
Thermodynamics
Put a lot of particles in a box and wait...
System will reach state of thermodynamic equilibrium,characterized by few macroscopic state variables
Equation of State – relation between different state variables
Ideal gas law
P(T ,V ,N) =N TV
= n T
Good starting point for applying thermodynamic approachSimple mathematical propertiesWith proper input (atoms, molecules, hadrons, ...) can describe wellcertain regions of corresponding phase diagramCannot be used to describe phase transitions (no liquid-vapor)
4 / 25
Van der Waals equationVan der Waals equation
P(T ,V ,N) =NT
V − bN− a
N2
V 2
Formulated in 1873.Nobel Prize in 1910.
Two ingredients:1) Short-range repulsion: particles are hard spheres,
V → V − bN, b = 44πr3
32) Attractive interactions in mean-field approximation,P → P − a n2
Later derived from statistical physics5 / 25
Van der Waals equation
VDW isotherms show irregular behavior below certain temperature TC
Interpreted as the appearance of phase transitionBelow TC isotherms are corrected by Maxwell’s rule of equal areas
1 2 3 4-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
T=0.8
T=0.9
T=1
P
v
T=1.1
mixed phase
liquid
Tn
gas
Critical point∂p∂v = 0, ∂2p
∂v2 = 0, v = V/N
pC = a27b2 , nC = 1
3b , TC = 8a27b
Reduced variables
p =p
pC, n =
nnC, T =
TTC
6 / 25
Van der Waals equation
VDW equation is quite successful in describing qualitative features ofliquid-vapour phase transition in classical substances
But can it provide insight on phase transitions in QCD?
7 / 25
Van der Waals equation
VDW equation is quite successful in describing qualitative features ofliquid-vapour phase transition in classical substances
Tempe
rature
net-baryon density0
Tc
nuclei
hadron gas
Quark Gluon Plasma
Big bang
neutron stars
nucleon gas
Heavy Ion Collisions
But can it provide insight on phase transitions in QCD?
7 / 25
Statistical ensembles
VDW equation originally formulated in canonical ensemble
Canonical ensembleSystem of N particles in fixed volume V exchanges energy with largereservoir (heat bath)State variables: T , V , NThermodynamic potential – free energy F (T ,V ,N)
All other quantities determined from F (T ,V ,N)
Grand canonical ensembleSystem of particles in fixed volume V exchanges both energy andparticles with large reservoir (heat bath)State variables: T , V , µN no longer conserved. Chemical potential µ regulates 〈N〉Pressure P(T , µ) as function of T and µ contains complete information
GCE is more natural for systems with variable number of particlesGCE formulation opens possibilities for new applications in nuclear physics
8 / 25
How to transform CE pressure P(T ,n) into GCE pressure P(T , µ)?Calculate µ(T ,V ,N) from standard TD relationsInvert the relation to get N(T ,V , µ) and put it back into P(T ,V ,N)
Consistency due to thermodynamic equivalence of ensembles
Result: transcendental equation for n(T , µ)
NV≡ n(T , µ) =
nid(T , µ∗)
1 + b nid(T , µ∗), µ∗ = µ − b
n T1− b n
+ 2a n
Implicit equation in GCE, in CE it as explicitMay have multiple solutions below TC
Choose one with largest pressure – equivalent to Maxwell rule in CE
Advantages of the GCE formulation1) Hadronic physics applications: number of hadrons usually not conserved.2) CE cannot describe particle number fluctuations. N-fluctuations in asmall (V � V0) subsystem follow GCE results.3) Good starting point to include effects of quantum statistics.
9 / 25
Scaled variance in VDW equation
New application from GCE formualtion: particle number fluctuations
Scaled variance is an intensive measure of N-fluctuations
σ2
N= ω[N] ≡ 〈N
2〉 − 〈N〉2
〈N〉=
Tn
(∂n∂µ
)T
=Tn
(∂2P∂µ2
)T
In ideal Boltzmann gas fluctuations are Poissonian and ωid [N] = 1.
ω[N] in VDW gas (pure phases)
ω[N] =
[1
(1− bn)2 −2anT
]−1
Repulsive interactions suppress N-fluctuationsAttractive interactions enhance N-fluctuations
N-fluctuations are useful because theyCarry information about finer details of EoS, e.g. phase transitionsMeasurable experimentally
10 / 25
Phase transition signatures
Imagine we are measuring distribution of particle number
Ideal gas
0 1 2 30
1
2
3
T/Tc
n / n c
n / n C
0 . 0 0
1 . 0 0
2 . 0 0
3 . 0 0
VDW gas
0 1 2 30
1
2
3
m i x e d p h a s e
l i q u i d
T/Tc
n / n c
g a s
n / n C
0 . 0 0
1 . 0 0
2 . 0 0
3 . 0 0
Measuring average 〈N〉 (or average energy) gives no information aboutphase transitions
11 / 25
Phase transition signatures
What about fluctuations?
Ideal gas
0 1 2 30
1
2
3
T/Tc
n / n c
ω[ N ]
0 . 0 10 . 1 0
1 . 0 0
1 0 . 0 0
VDW gas
0 1 2 30
1
2
3
1 02
1 0 . 5
m i x e d p h a s e
l i q u i d
T/Tc
n / n c
g a s
0 . 1 ω[ N ]
0 . 0 10 . 1 0
1 . 0 0
1 0 . 0 0
Deviations from unity signal interaction effectsFluctuations grow rapidly near critical point
V. Vovchenko et al., J. Phys. A 305001, 48 (2015)
12 / 25
Skewness
Higher-order (non-gaussian) fluctuations are even more sensitive
Skewness: Sσ =〈(∆N)3〉σ2 = ω[N] +
Tω[N]
(∂ω[N]
∂µ
)T
asymmetry
0 1 2 30
1
2
3
metastablemetas
table
10
1
0
-1
unstable
liquid
T
n
gas-10
S
-40.00
-10.00
-1.000.001.00
10.00
40.00
Skewness isPositive (right-tailed) in gaseous phaseNegative (left-tailed) in liquid phase
13 / 25
Kurtosis
Kurtosis: κσ2 =〈(∆N)4〉 − 3 〈(∆N)2〉2
σ2 peakedness
0 1 2 30
1
2
3
100100-100 10
1
0-1
metastablemetas
table
10
10 -1
unstable
liquid
T
n
gas
-10
-40.00
-10.00
-1.000.001.00
10.00
40.00
Kurtosis is negative (flat) above critical point (crossover), positive (peaked)elsewhere and very sensitive to the proximity of the critical point
14 / 25
VDW equation with quantum statistics
Nucleon-nucleon potential:Repulsive core at small distancesAttraction at intermediate distancesSuggestive similarity to VDWinteractionsCould nuclear matter described by VDWequation?
Original VDW equation is for Boltzmann statisticsNucleons are fermions, obey Pauli exclusion principleUnlike for classical fluids, uncertainty principle is important
Requirements for VDW equation with quantum statistics
1) Reduce to ideal quantum gas at a = 0 and b = 02) Reduce to classical VDW when quantum statistics are negligible3) s ≥ 0 and s → 0 as T → 0
15 / 25
VDW equation with quantum statistics in GCE
Ansatz: Take pressure in the following form
p(T , µ) = pid(T , µ∗)− an2, µ∗ = µ− b p − a b n2 + 2an
where pid(T , µ∗) is pressure of ideal quantum gas.
n(T , µ) =
(∂p∂µ
)T
=nid(T , µ∗)
1 + b nid(T , µ∗)
s(T , µ) =
(∂p∂T
)µ
=sid(T , µ∗)
1 + b nid(T , µ∗)
ε(T , µ) = Ts + µn − p = [εid(T , µ∗)− an] n
This formulation explicitly satisfies requirements 1-3
Algorithm for GCE
1) Solve system of eqs. for p and n at given (T , µ) (there may be multiplesolutions)2) Choose the solution with largest pressure
16 / 25
Nuclear matter as a VDW gas of nucleons
Nuclear matter is known to have a liquid-gas phase transition atT ≤ 20 MeV and exhibit VDW-like behaviorUsually studied analyzing nuclear fragment distributionHas long history...
Theory:Csernai, Kapusta, Phys. Rept. (1986)Stoecker, Greiner, Phys. Rept. (1986)Serot, Walecka, Adv. Nucl. Phys. (1986)Bondorf, Botvina, Ilinov, Mishustin, Sneppen, Phys. Rept. (1995)
Experiment:Pochodzalla et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (1995)Natowitz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (2002)Karnaukhov et al., Phys. Rev. C (2003)
Our description: Nuclear matter as a system of nucleons (d = 4,m = 938 MeV) described by VDW equation with Fermi statistics. Pions,resonances and nuclear fragments are neglected
17 / 25
VDW gas of nucleons: zero temperature
How to fix a and b? For classical fluid usually tied to CP location.Different approach: Reproduce saturation density and binding energy
From EB ∼= −16 MeV and n = n0 ∼= 0.16 fm−3 at T = p = 0 we obtain:
a ∼= 329 MeV fm3 and b ∼= 3.42 fm3 (r ∼= 0.59 fm)
0.00 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40(b)
E B (M
eV)
n (fm-3)
Mixed phase at T = 0 is special:A mix of vacuum (n = 0) and liquidat n = n0
1 0 - 2 1 0 - 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 3 1 0 4 1 0 5 1 0 6 1 0 7 1 0 8 1 0 91 0 - 1 71 0 - 1 61 0 - 1 51 0 - 1 41 0 - 1 31 0 - 1 21 0 - 1 11 0 - 1 01 0 - 91 0 - 8
A r g o nC O 2
r (fm)
a / b ( e V )
N u c l e a r m a t t e r
W a t e r
VDW eq. now at very different scale!
18 / 25
VDW gas of nucleons: pressure isotherms
CE pressure
p = pid[T , µid
( n1− bn
,T)]− a n2
0.00 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.280.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
(b)
T=15 MeV
T=18 MeV
T=19.7 MeV
P (M
eV/fm
3 )
n (fm-3)
T=21 MeV
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
(a)
T=15 MeV
T=18 MeV
T=19.7 MeV
P (M
eV/fm
3 )v (fm3)
T=21 MeV
Behavior qualitatively same as for Boltzmann caseMixed phase results from Maxwell construction
Critical point at Tc ∼= 19.7 MeV and nc ∼= 0.07 fm−3
Experimental estimate1: Tc = 17.9± 0.4 MeV, nc = 0.06± 0.01 fm−3
1J.B. Elliot, P.T. Lake, L.G. Moretto, L. Phair, Phys. Rev. C 87, 054622 (2013)19 / 25
VDW gas of nucleons: (T , µ) plane
Density in (T , µ) plane2
880 890 900 910 920 9300
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
liquid
T (M
eV)
(MeV)
gas
n (fm-3)
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.07
0.09
0.11
0.13
0.16
0.18
Crossover region at µ < µC∼= 908 MeV is clearly seen
1V. Vovchenko et al., Phys. Rev. C 91, 064314 (2015) 20 / 25
VDW gas of nucleons: (T , µ) plane
Density in (T , µ) plane2
880 890 900 910 920 9300
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
liquid
T (M
eV)
(MeV)
gas
n (fm-3)
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.07
0.09
0.11
0.13
0.16
0.18
Boltzmann CP
Boltzmann: TC = 28.5 MeV. Fermi statistics important at CP1V. Vovchenko et al., Phys. Rev. C 91, 064314 (2015) 20 / 25
VDW gas of nucleons: scaled variance
Scaled variance in quantum VDW:
ω[N] = ωid(T , µ∗)
[1
(1− bn)2 −2anT
ωid(T , µ∗)
]−1
880 890 900 910 920 9300
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
10
2
1 0.5
liquid
T (M
eV)
(MeV)
gas
0.1
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
21 / 25
VDW gas of nucleons: skewness and kurtosis
Skewness
Sσ = ω[N] +Tω[N]
(∂ω[N]
∂µ
)T
880 890 900 910 920 9300
5
10
15
20
25
30
35-1
10
1
0 -1
liquid
T (M
eV)
(MeV)
gas
-10
S
-40.00
-10.00
-1.000.001.00
10.00
40.00
Kurtosis
κσ2 = (Sσ)2 + T(∂[Sσ]
∂µ
)T
880 890 900 910 920 9300
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
-100100
10010
1
10
10-1
liquid
T (M
eV)
(MeV)
gas
-10
-40.00
-10.00
-1.000.001.00
10.00
40.00
V. Vovchenko et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 054901 (2015)
22 / 25
Pion gas with van der Waals equationInteracting pion gas as a VDW gas with Bose statistics
VDW parameters: r = 0.3 fm and a/b = 500 MeV
No conserved charges (µ = 0), only temperature dependence
1 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 3 0 1 4 0 1 5 0 1 6 00
2
4
6
8
1 0 V a n d e r W a a l s g a s o f p i o n s P i o n s + H a g e d o r n s p e c t r u m i d e a l g a s
C [fm
-3 ]
T [ M e V ]
x
0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 6 00 . 0
0 . 1
0 . 2
0 . 3
0 . 4 V a n d e r W a a l s g a s o f p i o n s P i o n s + H a g e d o r n s p e c t r u m i d e a l g a s
xc2 s
T [ M e V ]
At some T > T0 there are no solutions!Van der Waals attraction leads to emergence of limiting temperatureConsequence of GCE and Bose statisticsSuggestive similarity to Hagedorn mass spectrumHint of phase transition to new state of matter?
R. Poberezhnyuk et al., arXiv:1508.0458523 / 25
VDW interactions in hadron resonance gas
Hadron resonance gas – successful model for low density part of QCD
Usually modeled as non-interacting gas of hadrons and resonances
Add repulsive VDW interactions
Better agreement with lattice
0 200 400 600 800 1000 12000
100
200
300
400
500
200
GeV
Lines: S/B const.
17.3 GeV12.3 GeV
8.8 GeV
7.6 GeV
Circles: rp = 0.5 fm
"Crossterms" EV, rp = 0.5 fm
T (M
eV)
B (MeV)
Contours show valleys of 2 minima
Diamonds: rp = 0.0 fm
6.3 GeV
Big change in fits to exp. data
Eigenvolume interactions had largely been overlooked in past!
V. Vovchenko, H. Stoecker, arXiv:1512.08046
24 / 25
Summary
1 Classical VDW equation is transformed to GCE and generalized toinclude effects of quantum statistics.
2 Scaled variance, skewness, and kurtosis of particle number fluctuationsare calculated for VDW equation. Role of repulsive ans attractiveinteractions is clarified.
3 VDW equation with Fermi statistics for nucleons is able to describeproperties of symmetric nuclear matter. VDW equation with Bosestatistics for pions shows limiting temperature. Strong effect of VDWinteractions in HRG
4 Fluctuations are very sensitive to the proximity of the critical point.Gaseous phase is characterized by positive skewness while liquid phasecorresponds to negative skewness. The crossover region is clearlycharacterized by negative kurtosis in VDW model.
Thanks for your attention!
25 / 25
Summary
1 Classical VDW equation is transformed to GCE and generalized toinclude effects of quantum statistics.
2 Scaled variance, skewness, and kurtosis of particle number fluctuationsare calculated for VDW equation. Role of repulsive ans attractiveinteractions is clarified.
3 VDW equation with Fermi statistics for nucleons is able to describeproperties of symmetric nuclear matter. VDW equation with Bosestatistics for pions shows limiting temperature. Strong effect of VDWinteractions in HRG
4 Fluctuations are very sensitive to the proximity of the critical point.Gaseous phase is characterized by positive skewness while liquid phasecorresponds to negative skewness. The crossover region is clearlycharacterized by negative kurtosis in VDW model.
Thanks for your attention!
25 / 25