VALIDATED CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS SIGNIFICANTLY UP-REGULATES ECM SECRETION BY HUMAN TENOCYTES
-
Upload
russell-tucker -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
3
Transcript of VALIDATED CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS SIGNIFICANTLY UP-REGULATES ECM SECRETION BY HUMAN TENOCYTES
VALIDATED CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS SIGNIFICANTLY UP-REGULATESN BY HUMAN TENOCYTES
Russell Tucker (1,2), Sarah Franklin (2), Duanduan Chen (1), Yiannis Ventikos (1), Per Henningsson (3), Richard Bomphrey (3), Mark Thompson (1,2)
1. Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, UK; 2. Institute of Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK; 3 Department of Zoology,
University of Oxford, UK.
Introduction
Stimulating cells is vital for understanding cell
behaviour, providing a foundation for developing
tissue engineering applications. In vitro stimulation
devices are regularly used to study the effect of
mechanical forces on cell cultures; however these
devices are inherently limited as the method and
type of stimulation can vary between research
institutions and results can’t be attributed to a
validated force. Work by Thompson et al.
highlighted the presence of fluid flow in a device
thought to be primarily concerned with the
application of a substrate strain. This work presents
a new, simple, validated stimulation device that has
a high throughput and can be accurately reproduced
across research groups for varying phenotypes.
Methods
Cyclic fluid flow in a 6-well plate, induced with a
seesaw rocker (Stuart SSL4) allowed for accuracy
and repeatability at a consistent angle of tilt of 7 °.
2 ml of 0.5 % FCS/DMEM added to each well
drove shear stresses at the well base where human
tenocytes (up to passage 3) were cultured to
confluency. Digital particle image velocimetry
(PIV) captured velocity vectors (in a 60 x 60 mm
flow field) of a thin suspension of 48 �m
fluorescent microspheres seeded within a plate well
moving along a 10 mJ laser sheet in the central
plane. PIV vectors were compared to
computational fluid dynamics (CFD, ESI-ACE)
simulations (where Volume of Fluids was
employed to track the free surface), to validate
model assumptions and verify shear stresses at the
cell layer. Interrupted (8 hours with a break of 20
hours at the half-way point) and continuous (7
days) cyclic fluid stress was applied at 5 RPM.
ECM synthesis was investigated using biochemical
assays (SircolTM and DMB) and normalised with
dsDNA content (PicoGreen) and viability checked
with live/dead stain.
Results
Stimulation under both conditions resulted in a
significant increase in collagen and GAG secretion
(Fig 1A). With an increased duration of
stimulation, protein secretion increases non-
linearly. Flow patterns were similar in PIV (Fig 1B)
and CFD and maximal velocities matched to an
order of magnitude. CFD showed maximal shear
stresses at the cell layer for 5 RPM to be 0.13 Pa.
Figure 1: A) Collagen at the cell layer is
significantly up-regulated with the application of 8
hours of cyclic fluid shear stress (P <0.001). B)
PIV velocity vector transect of a 6 well plate
chamber at an angle of tilt of 7°. Velocity peaks at
±75mms-1 (orange and dark blue).
Discussion
It is essential that in vitro stimulation devices are
validated for biological results to be comparable
and meaningful. Fluid shear stress of 0.13 Pa at 5
RPM, significantly up-regulates the secretion of
proteins that are crucial in the formation of tendon
structure. Previous authors [Archambault, 2002]
have shown tenocytes to be sensitive to similar
shear stress levels. Tenocytes are known to possess
primary cilia which may be involved in the up-
regulated ECM response to fluid flow. Future work
will consider the effect of fluid flow on alignment
of cilia, cytoskeleton and cell across the culture
well and investigate the role of shear stress
magnitude on cellular response. A deeper
understanding of mechanotransduction is essential
for engineering replacement tissue to treat
musculoskeletal disease.
References
Thompson et al, J Biomech Model Mechanobiol,
10 559-564 (2011)
Archambault et al, J Biomech 35 303-309 (2002)
A
B
ECM SECRETIO
Presentation 1494 − Topic 31. Mechanobiology and cell biomechanics S437
ESB2012: 18th Congress of the European Society of Biomechanics Journal of Biomechanics 45(S1)