Use of Debt in Projects Coal Fuel Purchases 8.2 Million/Year Coal Plant Construction 120 Million...
-
Upload
kimberly-jackson -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Use of Debt in Projects Coal Fuel Purchases 8.2 Million/Year Coal Plant Construction 120 Million...
Use of Debt in Projects
Coal Fuel Purchases 8.2 Million/Year
Coal Plant Construction120 Million Dollars
0 1 ………………………………………………………………..20
Natural Gas Fuel Purchases 34.3 Million/Year
Natural Gas Plant Construction35 Million
0 1 …………………………………………………………………20
-
Study the advantageof choosing coal overNatural Gas(oh yes subtract Preferred- the other thing)
26.1 Million/Year in Fuel Savings
85 Million inAdditional ConstructionCosts
=Cash flow for choosingcoal over natural gas
IRR of this Cash Flow is 30.56%
Change the Financial Structure
$25 Millionadditionalcapital upfront
$26.1 Million Each Year in Fuel Savings
$6.57 Million Each Year in Debt Service
The remaining $60 million dollars wefinance with bank loans over 20 yearsat 9% interest
The IRR of this Cash Flow is78.12%
What Happened???!!
• We applied a principle called leverage– analogy is to the use of a lever that magnifies
your strength
• We use someone else's money at a lower rate of interest than the rate of return in the project and pocket the difference for ourselves
Use of Leverage
• Most companies will try to sweeten investor returns by use of leverage
• Some People buy stock on “Margin”– if the stock price is growing faster than the interest rate it
increases your return
– What makes more money than 400 shares doubling their price
– 4000 shares of stock doubling their price
• May have heard of leveraged buy outs where company operators buy the company using debt
How Can You Do That?
• If the project is so good why doesn't the bank just buy it?– The expertise factor - banks know how to lend
money - not necessarily run projects– Banks are more risk adverse - they don’t take as
many chances and have a lower risk premium on investment
• It’s the same project - how can the bank have less risk?
Risk deals with Likelihood and Magnitude of Loss
An $85 Million Dollar Investment
Declines in Value to$60 Million Dollars
Our Investors Loose29.5% of theirInvestment
An $85 Million Dollar Investmentis paid for with $25 Million of InvestorMoney and $60 Million with borrowedmoney
Declines in Value to$60 Million Dollars
The Bank Looses Nothing
The Investor Looses
With Leverage - You Pocket the Earnings and the Risk
When Things Were Rotten
Life Skunk Power and Light Invested anextra $85 Million to build a coal firedpower plant instead of natural gas
Leaving $7.6 Million Per Year in Fuel Savings
The Price of Natural Gas Drops to $2.20/MBTU from $4.50/MBTUThe Gore Worms puta carbon tax on coalto save the world fromGlobal Worming
The IRR on the Project is now6.31%
But Then Larry Leverage Remembers that youcan sweeten projects by using debt financing!
Any More Bright Ideas Larry?
Leaving $7.6 Million Per Year in Fuel Savings
The Price of Natural Gas Drops to $2.20/MBTU from $4.50/MBTUThe Gore Worms puta carbon tax on coalto save the world fromGlobal Worming
Life Stuckspends anextra $25Million fora coal plant
The rest is financed at 9% for $6.57 Million per year
The IRR of this Cash Flow is -1.77%(ie - it looses money and has no pay-backperiod)
The Dark Side of Leverage
• Many people do not understand that if the return in a project drops below the interest rate that they will get levered down– They take the risk– The Bank takes the money
• Leverage magnifies often improves project rate of return
• But it can also increase down-side risk
Use Leverage with Caution
And a Generous Helping of Understanding