Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters

16
Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters Al Parrella Western Lake Superior Sanitary District Duluth, MN

description

Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters . Al Parrella Western Lake Superior Sanitary District Duluth, MN. Add bleach here. Final effluent. Problem statement:. Bacteria increases across effluent filters Seems to be a seasonal phenomenon (worse towards end of season). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters

Page 1: Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters

Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters

Al ParrellaWestern Lake Superior Sanitary District

Duluth, MN

Page 2: Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters
Page 3: Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters

Add bleach here

Final effluent

Page 4: Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters

Problem statement:

• Bacteria increases across effluent filters– Seems to be a seasonal phenomenon

(worse towards end of season)

Page 5: Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters
Page 6: Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters

Fecal coliform, before and after filtersMonthly geometric mean

April May June July August SeptemberOctober0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

BeforeAfter

Page 7: Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters

Fecal coliform, before and after filtersMonthly geometric mean

April May June July August SeptemberOctober0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

BeforeAfter

Problem Limit

Page 8: Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters

Troubleshooting

• Use of ATP pen• Test ATP at various location including the

effluent of each filter• Results reported as difference between “total”

and “free”

Page 9: Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters

Secondary

Effluen

t

Floc T

ank In

fluent

Filter

Effluen

t 1

Filter

Effluen

t 2

Filter

Effluen

t 3

Filter

Effluen

t 4

Filter

Effluen

t 5

Filter

Effluen

t 6

Filter

Effluen

t 7

Filter

Effluen

t 8

Filter

Effluen

t 9

Filter

Effluen

t 10

Filter

Effluen

t 11

Filter

Effluen

t 12

Final

Effluen

t0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

ATP Assessment October 2, 2013

Page 10: Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters

Results

• Clearly there was a problem with number 11 filter

• Found several mechanical issues related to backwash system

Page 11: Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters

Secondary

Effluen

t*

Floc T

ank In

fluent

Filter

Effluen

t 1

Filter

Effluen

t 2

Filter

Effluen

t 3

Filter

Effluen

t 4

Filter

Effluen

t 5

Filter

Effluen

t 6

Filter

Effluen

t 7

Filter

Effluen

t 8

Filter

Effluen

t 9

Filter

Effluen

t 10

Filter

Effluen

t 11

Filter

Effluen

t 12

Backwash

Wate

r

Final

Effluen

t0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

ATP AssessmentOctober 15, 2013

Page 12: Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters

Conclusion

• It’s hard to clean 100+ tons of media

Page 13: Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters
Page 14: Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters
Page 15: Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters

Steps

• Start meter• Obtain sample• Submerge pen• Break ampule• Mix• Obtain reading– Units are in “relative light units”

Page 16: Use of ATP to identify poor-performing filters

Thanks to…

• …Roger Sandstrom, Treatment Plant Operator• Kathy Hamel, PE, Operations and

Maintenance Supervisor, Clean Water Production