unit3(a) ob2009
-
Upload
rahul-rastogi -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of unit3(a) ob2009
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
1/68
GROUP
Two or more individuals, interacting andinterdependent, who come together to achieve
particular objectives.
A group is not a population but a set of two or
more people aware of each other
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
2/68
IMPORTANCE OF GROUPS
The study of groups is important to the manager for a number of reasons :
1. The group is a key element in the social
order of our culture. Groups serve not onlyas the focal point of social life, but theyprovide an important source of direction toindividuals for understanding social valuesand norms.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
3/68
IMPORTANCE OF GROUPS (cont..)
2.Through participation in groups, individualsmay satisfy important economic status,safety, security and friendship needs.
3. The behavior and performance of groupsprovides a major mechanism for the
achievement of organizational goals
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
4/68
WHY DO PEOPLE JOIN GROUPS?
SecurityStatusSelf-esteemAffiliationPower
Goal Achievement .
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
5/68
TYPES OF GROUPS
1. FORMAL GROUP : Is formed by theorganization to do its work, is relativelypermanent
2 INFORMAL GROUP : Is established by itsmembers and is relatively temporary.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
6/68
1. FORMAL GROUP
.Command groupTask groupAffinity group
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
7/68
COMMAND GROUP:Is relatively a permanent, formal group with
functional reporting relationships and isusually included in the organizational charts .
TASK GROUP:
Is a relatively a temporary, formal groupestablished to perform a specific task .
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
8/68
AFFINITY GROUPS:They are the collection of employees form the
same level in the organization who meet onregular basis to share information, captureemerging opportunities and solve
problems.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
9/68
2. INFORMAL GROUPS
Interest group : Bowling group, Womensnetwork.
Friendship group: Friends who do many activities together.
( attend the theater, play games, travel)
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
10/68
STAGES OF GROUPDEVELOPMENT
Groups go through five distinct stages:
1. Forming stage :
The first stage in group development
Characterized by much uncertainty about the groups purpose,structure and leadership.
Members are testing the waters to determine what types of behavior are acceptable .
This stage is complete when members have begun to think of themselves as part of a group.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
11/68
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
12/68
3. Norming stage :
This is the third stage in group development,characterized by close relationships and cohesiveness.
This stage is complete when the group structuresolidifies and the group has assimilated a common set of expectations of what defines correct member behavior.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
13/68
4. Performing stage :
This is the fourth stage in group development , when thegroup is fully accepted and functional.
Group energy has moved from getting to know andunderstand each other to performing the task at hand.
4.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
14/68
5. Adjourning stage :
The final stage in group development for temporary
group
Is characterized by concern with wrapping up activitiesrather than task performance
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
15/68
GROUP PERFORMANCE FACTORS
Group compositionGroup sizeGroup normsGroup cohesiveness
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
16/68
GROUP PERFORMANCE FACTORS(cont..)1. GROUP COMPOSITION:
Is the degree of similarity or difference among group members on factors important to thegroups work .
2. GROUP SIZE:
Is the number of members of the group; groupsize affects the number of resourcesavailable to perform the task
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
17/68
GROUP PERFORMANCE FACTORS(cont)3. GROUP NORM:
Is a standard against which theappropriateness of a behavior is judged
4. GROUP COHESIVENESS:Is the extent to which a group is committed to
staying together
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
18/68
INTERGROUP DYNAMICS
INTERACTION
GROUPCHARACTERSISTICSIndividual Personalities
and characteristics,Group action
tendencies andDispositions,Group Composition,
Cohesiveness,Size, Norms and
Roles
GROUPCHARACTERSISTICSIndividual Personalities
and characteristics,Group actiontendencies and
Dispositions,Group Composition,
Cohesiveness,Size, Norms and
Roles
ORGANISATIONAL SETTINGRules and procedures, history,Traditions and culture, Goal andReward systems, DecisionMaking process.
BASES FOR INTERACTIONS
LocationResources, time and Goal
InterdependenceTask uncertainty
Task interdependence
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
19/68
GROUP PROPERTIES
Role (role identity, role perception, role expectations, roleconflict)
Norms- tells members of group what they ought to do andought not to do under certain circumstances.
Status
Size
cohesiveness
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
20/68
GROUP DECISION MAKING
The belief characterized by juries that twoheads are better than one has long beenaccepted as a basic component of North
American and many other countries legalsystems.
This belief has expanded to the point that,today, many decisions in organizations aremade by groups, teams, or committees.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
21/68
GROUP DECISION MAKING IN ANORGANIZATION
GROUP POLARIZATION GROUP THINK PARTICIPATION
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
22/68
GROUP DECISION MAKING IN ANORGANIZATION (cont..)
Group polarization:Is the tendency for a groups average post
discussion attitudes to be more extreme than its
average pre-discussion attitudes .GROUP THINK:Is a mode of thinking that occurs when members
of a group are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, and the desire for unanimity offsets their motivation to praise alternative courses of action
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
23/68
GROUP DECISION MAKING IN ANORGANIZATION (cont..)
PARTICIPATION:
Employee participation in decision making
appropriate depends on the situation
Participation in decision making is also related toorganizational structure for eg. Decentralizationinvolves delegating some decision making authority throught the organizational hierarchy .
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
24/68
GROUP PROBLEM SOLVING
To improve the generation of alternatives,managers may employ any of the followingthree techniques to stimulate the groups
problem solving capabilities:1. BRAIN STORMING2. NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE
3. DELPHI TECHNIQUE
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
25/68
BRAIN STORMING
It is meant to overcome pressures for conformity in the interacting group that retardthe development of creative alternatives.
It does this by utilizing an idea-generationprocess that specifically encourages any and
all alternatives while with-holding anycriticism of those alternatives.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
26/68
BRAIN STORMING (cont)
In a typical brainstorming session, a half adozen to a dozen people sit around a table.
The group leader states the problem in aclear manner so that it is understood by allparticipants.
Members then free associate as manyalternatives as they can in a given length of time.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
27/68
BRAIN STORMING (cont)
No criticism is allowed, and all thealternatives are recorded for later discussionand analysis.
Brainstorming may indeed generate ideas-but not in a very efficient manner
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
28/68
BRAIN STORMING (cont)
Research consistently shows that individualsworking alone will generate more ideas thana group in brainstorming session.
In other words, when people are generating ideas in a group, many people are talking at once, which blocks the thought process and eventually impedes the sharing of the ideas.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
29/68
NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE
Nominal group technique restricts discussionor interpersonal communication during thedecision making process, hence, the term
nominal.
Group members are physically present, as in
a traditional committee meeting, butmembers operate independently.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
30/68
NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE(cont)Specifically, a problem is presented and the
following steps take place:
1.Members meet as a group , but before any discussion
takes place each member independently writes downideas about the problem.
2.After this silent period, each member presents oneidea to the group.
3.Each member takes a turn, presenting a single ideauntil all ideas have been presented and recorded.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
31/68
NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE(cont)
4.No discussion takes place until all ideas have been recorded.
5. The group then discussed the ideas for clarity and evaluatesthem .
6. Each group member silently and independently ranks theideas in order of value or quality.
7. The idea with the highest aggregate ranking determines thefinal decision.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
32/68
Advantage of the nominal grouptechnique
The chief advantage of the nominal grouptechnique is that :
it permits the group meet formally
but does not restrict independent thinking, asdoes the interacting group .
Research generally shows that nominalgroups outperform brainstorming groups.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
33/68
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
34/68
Up to 50 people sit around a horseshoe-shaped table, empty except for a series of responses into their computer terminals.
Issues are presented to participants, and theykeyboard their responses into their computers.
Individual comments as well as aggregatevotes, are displayed on a projection screen.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
35/68
Advantages of ElectronicMeeting Technique.
1.The proposed advantages of electronicmeetings are anonymity, honesty and speed.
2. Participants can anonymously type anymessage they want, and it flashes on thescreen for all to see at the push of a
participants key.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
36/68
3.It also allows people to be brutally honestwithout penalty.
4.And its supposedly fast because : chitchat is eliminated,discussions dont digress, and
many participants can talk at once without stepping on one anothers toes.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
37/68
DISADVANTAGES OF ELECTRONIC MEETING
The early evidence, however, indicates thatelectronic meetings dont achieve most of their proposed benefits.
Evaluations of numerous studies found that:
electronic meetings actually led to decreased group effectiveness,
required more time to complete tasks and resulted in reduced member satisfaction whencompared to face-to-face groups .
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
38/68
DISADVANTAGES OF ELECTRONICMEETING (cont..)
Nevertheless, current enthusiasm for computer-mediated communicationssuggests that this technology is here to stayand is only likely to increase in popularity inthe future.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
39/68
THE DELPHI TECHNIQUE
1. The Delphi Technique is a method of systematically gathering judgments of experts for use in developing forecasts
2. It is designed for groups who do not meet face-to-face.
For E.g.. The product manager of a Mahor toy manufacturer might use this technique to probethe views of industry experts to forecast thedevelopments in the dynamic toy market.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
40/68
THE DELPHI TECHNIQUE (cont..)
3. The manager who wants the inputs of a groupis the central figure in the process.
4. After recruiting the participants, the manager develops a questionnaire for them to complete
5.The questionnaire is relatively simple in that it
contains straightforward questions that dealwith the issue, trends in the area, newtechnological developments and other factorsthe manager is interested in.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
41/68
THE DELPHI TECHNIQUE (cont..)
6. The manger summarizes the responses andreports back to the experts with other questionnaire
7. This cycle may be repeated as many timesas necessary to generate the information themanger needs.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
42/68
ADVANTAGES OF THE DELPHI TECHNIQUE
It is useful technique when experts are physicallydispersedAnonymity is desired, or the participants are
known to have trouble communicating with oneanother because of extreme differences of opinion.This method also avoids the intimidation problemsthat may exists in decision-making groups.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
43/68
TEAM
Team is a small number of people withcomplementary skills who are committed to acommon purpose, common performance
goals and an approach for which they holdthemselves mutually accountable.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
44/68
WORK GROUP
A group that interacts primarily to shareinformation and to make decision to helpeach group member to perform within his or
her area.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
45/68
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A GROUPAND A TEAM
A work group is a group that interacts primarily to shareinformation and to make decisions to help each member performwithin his or her area of responsibility. Work groups have noneed or opportunity to engage in collective work that requires
joint effort. So their performance is merely the summation of
each group members individual contribution . There is nopositive synergy that would create an overall level of performance that is greater then the sum of the inputs.
In contrast, a work team generates positive synergy through
coordinated effort. Their individual efforts result in a level of performance that is greater then the sum of those individualinputs.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
46/68
TYPES OF TEAMS
The four most common types of teams are:1. Problem solving teams2. Self managed work teams
3. Cross-functional teams4. Virtual teams
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
47/68
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
48/68
PROBLEM SOLVING TEAMS(cont..)For instance, Merrill Lynch created a problem-
solving team to specifically figure out ways toreduce the number of days it took to open up
new cash management account.By suggesting in the number of steps in the process from 46 to 36, the team was able to
reduce the average number of days from 15 to 8.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
49/68
SELF MANAGED WORK TEAMS
Self managed work teams are groups of employees (typically 10 to 15 in number) whoperform highly related or interdependent jobs
and take on many of the responsibilities of their former supervisors.
.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
50/68
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
51/68
SELF MANAGED WORK TEAMS(cont)
Fully self-managed work teams even selecttheir own members and have the membersevaluate each others performance.
As a result, supervisory positions take ondecreased importance and may even be
eliminated
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
52/68
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
53/68
CROSS FUNCTIONAL TEAMS(cont..)
The Boeing example illustrates the use of cross-functional teams.
The Boeing company created a team made
up of employees from production, planning,quality, tooling, design engineering, and information systems to automate shims onthe companys C-17 program.
The teams suggestions resulted in drastically reduced cycle time, cost and improved quality on the C-17.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
54/68
CROSS FUNCTIONAL TEAMS(cont..)
Cross-functional teams are an effectivemeans for allowing people from diverse areaswithin an organization or even between the
organizations) to exchange information,develop new ideas, solve problems, and coordinate complex projects.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
55/68
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
56/68
VIRTUAL TEAMS (cont)
Virtual teams can do everything that other teams do other than face to face interaction.
Virtual teams tend to be more task orientedand exchange less social-emotionalinformation.
It allows people to work together who mightotherwise never be able to collaborate.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
57/68
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
58/68
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
59/68
Enhanced Performance(cont..)Enhanced performance can come in many
forms including:1. Improved productivity 2. Quality and 3. Customer service
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
60/68
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Teams can provide the -sense of self-control Human dignity
Identification with work,Sense of self-worth and Sense of self fulfillment for which the current workers seems to strive
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
61/68
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (cont..)
Team gives the employees The freedom to grow To gain respect and dignity by managing themselves,Making decisions about their work and
Really making a difference in the world around them
As a result, employees have a better work life, face lessstress at work and make less use of employee
assistance programs.
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
62/68
REDUCED COSTS
When the team members feel that1. they have a stake in the outcomes,2. want to make contributions because they are
valued and 3. Are committed to their team and do not want to
let it down show significant cost reduction
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
63/68
REDUCED COSTS (cont..)
Empowered teams showing significant costreductions could be by-
1. Reducing scrap,2. make fewer worker compensation claims3. Reduce absenteeism and turn over.
ORGANIZATION ENHANCEMENTS
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
64/68
ORGANIZATION ENHANCEMENTS
Improvements in organization that resultfrom other cultures to team based culturesincludes
1. Increased innovation2. Creativity and 3. flexibility
Use of teams can eliminate redundantlayers of bureaucracy and flatten thehierarchy in large organizations
T f B fi S ifi b fi O i i l l
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
65/68
Type of Benefit Specific benefit Organizational examples
Enhanced performance Increased productivity
Improved qualityImproved customer service
Ampex: on-time customer deliveryrose 98%
KShoes: Rejects per million droppedfrom 5,000 50 250Eastman : Productivity rose 70%
Employee benefits Quality of work life
Lower stress
Milwaukee Mutual : Employeeassistance program usage dropped to40% below industry average
Reduced costs Lower turnover,AbsenteeismFewer injuries
Kodak : reduced employee turnover toone-half the industry averageTexas Instruments : reduced costsmore than 50%
Organizationalenhancements
Increased innovation,flexibility
IDS Mutual fund Operations : improvedflexibility to handle fluctuations inmarket activity.Helwet-Packard : Innovative order-processing system.
CREATING EFFECTIVE TEAMS
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
66/68
CREATING EFFECTIVE TEAMS
The key components making up of effectiveteams can be subsumed into four generalcategories.
First is the resources and the other contextual influences that make teams effective.The second relates to the teams composition.The third category is work design.
Finally, process variables reflect those things that go on in the team that influences effectiveness.
PHASES OF TEAM
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
67/68
PHASES OF TEAMIMPLEMENTATION
Implementation of teams in organization is a longand arduous processAfter the decision is made to initiate teams, the
steering committed develops the plans for thedesign team, which plans the entire process.The goal is for teams to become self-managing.The time it takes for each stage varies with theorganization
PHASES OF TEAM
PHASE 5:
-
8/8/2019 unit3(a) ob2009
68/68
IMPLENTATION
Make the Decision
Plan theimplementation
PHASE 1:Start-Up
PHASE 2:Reality & Unrest
PHASE 3:Leader-Centered
Teams
PHASE 4:Tightly Formed Teams
Self-Managing teams