Two Accountability Systems This Year NCLB AZ Learns Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Yes / No...
-
Upload
corey-mason -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
3
Transcript of Two Accountability Systems This Year NCLB AZ Learns Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Yes / No...
Two Accountability Systems This Year
NCLB AZ Learns
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Yes / No
Excelling, Highly-Performing, Performing,
Underperforming
Student Inclusion Criteria
Inclusion
Criteria
AYP AZ LEARNS
30 Student Minimum
Yes* Yes
Include Exempt** ELL Students
Yes No
Include Out of Level Students
Yes No
Include Mobile Students
No No
* AYP aggregates these students into larger totals** Students in an ELL program for less than 4 years starting in 1st grade
3 S/G = 0-276 S/G = 0-529 S/G = 0-77
3 S/G = 0-276 S/G = 0-529 S/G = 0-77
Total School Points
+ =0 or 1 Points
Up to 40% of Max Points
+
Total Baseline /Growth Points
0 - 2 PointsOR
Adequate Yearly
Progress
MAP/Ext Writing
Elem/Middle
Dropout/ Grad Rates
H. S.
1 to 6 Points for Each Subject/ Grade Level
AZ LEARNS Revised Model
Changes to AZ LEARNS from 2002Positive Changes
Two-year baseline: will help school with a very high or low initial year
70/30 weighting: the higher of your baseline or growth is weighted 70%
Mobile students excluded Added evidence (MAP/Ext. Writ) theoretically given
more weight for elementary / middle schools Statutory language rewritten to allow for more
excelling schools
Changes to AZ LEARNS from 2002Negative Changes
70/30 weighting tends to flatten school differences, resulting in narrow cut score ranges
“Added” evidence is in fact an integral part of cuts AYP—only 1 point regardless of # of Subject/Grades Exceeding threshold criteria needed to keep a “Highly
Performing” or “Excelling” label are perhaps too rigorous
Interpreting Your Schools AZ-Learns Reports
AIMS Baseline /Growth Points for
Each Subject/GradeSchool Designation
Total Points
Total Points Needed for Each Designation
Exceeds Average Needed to Keep Highly Performing or Excelling Designations
Added Evidence
Over All School Designation
2 yr Baseline Mastery Rate
2yr Baseline FFB Rate
Last 3yr FFB Rate
Last 3yr Mastery Rate
Total Growth Points
Baseline Grouping Cuts
Growth Grouping Cuts
70% / 30% Weighting
3rd Grade Reading
Total Points
3rd Grade Math
Total Points
3rd Grade Writing
3-yrs of OYG (Stanford 9) for Reading and Math
3-yrs of AIMS Extended Writing Scores 24 or Greater
Total Added Evidence Points = 75% OYG + 25% Extended Writing
Weighted Percentage
Added Evidence Point Table
Added Evidence
AIMS Baseline /Growth Points for
Each Subject/GradeSchool Designation
Total Points
Total Points Needed for Each Designation
Exceeds Average Needed to Keep Highly Performing or Excelling Designations
Added Evidence
Over All School Designation
Tucson Unified School District--Overall
•Excelling 10•Highly Performing 11
•Performing61
•Underperforming12
AZ LEARNS—2 Year Comparison
Designation 2002 2003
Excelling 1 10
Highly Performing / (Improving)
34 11
Performing / (Maintaining) 45 61
Underperforming 21 12
Total 101 94*
*Due to changes in the model, several smaller TUSD elementary schools did not receive ratings in 2003
AZ LEARNS—TUSD Talking Points
• 2/3 (14/21) of Underperforming schools in 2002 Performing in 2003
• 43% decrease in Underperforming Schools
• 900% increase in Excelling Schools
• Only 2 schools which did not make AYP are Underperforming
• 7 Schools have two straight years of Underperforming
AZ-LEARNSLeading Education through Accountability and Results Notification System