TRIP REPORT FOR REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY …
44
I Spl.-fe Seperhi- ^ ''•••»','«•. SITE: (^.?.t^J^..- BREAK: '}..^S^..,. OTHER: ^ikTV?-.\. . SDMS DocID 469121 Trip Report Mottolo Site, RI/FS Conpllance Overslept Raymond, New Heuif>6hlre Prepared for U.S. BIVIBGNfBnAL PROrTECTIGN AGBCY Office of Waste Prograas Enforceaent Washington, D.C. 20460 Work Assignment No. : C01030 EPA Regl(m: 5 I Site No. IP03 1 Ctmtract No. 68-W9-0002 CDK Federal Programs Corporation Doc. No. ! TES5-C01030-RT-BJGZ Prepared By ! FPC Work Assignment Project Manager ; Michael Kulbersh Telephone No. : (617) 742-2659 Primary Contact : Roger Duwart Telephone No. : (617) 573-9628 Dat-e Prepared : October 10, 1989 ( >
Transcript of TRIP REPORT FOR REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY …
I
Spl-fe
S e p e r h i - ^ bull bull bull raquo laquo bull
SITE (^t^J^shyBREAK S OTHER ikTV-
SDMS DocID 469121
Trip Report
Mottolo S i t e RIFS Conpllance Overslept
Raymond New Heuifgt6hlre
Prepared for
US BIVIBGNfBnAL PROrTECTIGN AGBCY Office of Waste Prograas Enforceaent
Washington DC 20460
Work Assignment No C01030 EPA Regl(m 5 I Site No IP03 1
Ctmtract No 68-W9-0002 CDK Federal Programs Corporation Doc No TES5-C01030-RT-BJGZ Prepared By FPC Work Assignment Project Manager Michael Kulbersh Telephone No (617) 742-2659 Primary Contact Roger Duwart Telephone No (617) 573-9628 Dat-e Prepared October 10 1989 ( gt
TABLE OF CCNTENTS
TRIP REPORT
RAYMOND NEH HAMPSHIRE
Section Page
10 Introduction 1
20 CLP Laboratories 1
21 Location of Split Samples 2 22 Preservation of Samples 6
23 Quality Assurance Samples 6
30 Methods for Collecting Sanples 7
40 Sample Paperwork and Shitting of Coolers 9
50 Craiclusions 9
Figures
1 Monitoring Wiell Sampling Locations 4
2 Surface Water Sampling and Off-Site Monitoring well Sainpling Locations 5
Tables
1 Round II Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling Information 3
2 pa Conductivity and Ten^rature Measurements for Split Samples 8
Appendix
1 Letter from Balsam to EPA September 15 1989 2 Well Construction Details 3 Data Description Forms 4 Traffic Reports amp Chain-of-Custody Forms
Hraquo||r^t tBuwiy^T - ^ ViV v-vT-
I TRIP REPORT
10
20
HOTTOIO SITE
RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
Introduction
Consnencing on September 27 and ending on Septenter 28 1989 CDM Federal Programs Corporation (FPC) ccHiducted technical oversi^t of the second round of groundwater and surface water sampling at the Mottolo Site located in Raymond New Hampshire Hike Kulbersh and Bill Holden both of FPC were present for oversi^t activities
Based on round I data a refined suite of analytes were chosen The rational for the changes made at each well and surface water location were discussed with EPA prior to sanqpling and are documented by Balsam Environmental Corporation (Balsam) in a letter to the primary contact Roger Duwart on Septentber 15 1989 (Appendix 1)
In addition to sanpling activities Balsam installed two additional monitoring well couplets The monitoring wells are located south of the cement pad in the vicinity of MW-7 and MW-8 The purpose for installing these wells was to ascertain whether or not contaminants are migrating downgradient in a direction not initially anticipated
During oversight of sampling activities FPC observed the installation of monitoring wells MW-21S and MW-21D FPC obtained constructicxi details for these wells information pertaining to constructioi details is provided in Appendix 2
Steve Mangion of EPAs Hydrogeological SiJ jport Section visited the site on September 28 1989 Mr Mangion monitored the installation of monitoring well MW-21S The monitoring wells were installed by Avalanche Soil Exploration of Gorham Maii^ At Hr Duwarts direction oversight of the well installation program was conducted by EPA
CLP Laboratories i
During the two days of saspliijg FPC shipped 13 sauries for volatile organic analyses (VOAs) five samples for pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PestPCBs) analyses one sample for baseheutralacid (BNA) extractable analyses and six sanples for metals analyses
(1)
-t H^ gtraquobull J bull rv if(iWiflaquo4_gtraquo
All split samples were shipped under Case nutober 12791 fPC shipped the samples to the following laboratories
Volatile Organics
1 Aquatech Inc 75 Green Mountain Drive S Burlington VT 05403 (M7(802) 658-107658-10744 Attn Janlne Banks
I BNAs amp PestPCBs
lEA 1901 N Harrison Avenue Cary NC 27511 (919) 467-9919 Attn Gary Gilleland
Inorganics
Chemtech Consulting Gtcnxp 360 West llth Street New York NY 10014 (212) 255-2100 i Attn Kostas Lambiris
21 Location of Split Sanples
Table 1 presented below indicates the station number location date and time of collection eunalyses conducted on the sample sanple matrix and corresponding CLP traffic number assigned to each saiqple al(xig with a ccxmtent field Figures 1 and 2 identify the locations from where split samples were obtained On September 29 1989 Michael Kulbersh received a call from Cindfy Schreyer of EPAs Saaple Management Office (SMO) Ms Schreyer informed Mr Kulbersh that since analyses for extractables and PesticidesPCBs went to a different laboratory than the VGA sangtles that two distinctly different traffic numbers must be assigned to eadi sample Therefore at SMOs request FPC Federal Expressed to lEA Labs a revised Organic Traffic Report under the section special handling the original traffic nvmibers assigned to the 6anfgtles were referenced
(2)
TABLE 1 MOTTOLO SITE RAYMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING INFORMATION SEPTE31BER 27 AND 28 1989
STATION STATION DATETIME ANALYSES SAMPLE CLP TRAFFIC NUMBER LOCATION COLLECTION CONDUCTED NATRIX NUMBER OOMNENT FIELD
1 MWmdash6S 92789 1545 VQAs Metals AQ40lMAL540 2 Mlaquo-13D 92789 e 1240 VQAS GW AQ402 3 0W-4SR 92889 1520 VQAS BNAs Metals i GW AQ403A(2421nAL541 MSMSD 4 MW-18D 92889 e 1405 VQAS GW AQ404 5 N0-3SR 92889 e 1300 VQAS Metals GW AQ405HAL542 6 MO-35D 92889 e 1302 VQAS Metals -GW - AQ406HAL543 Duplicate saafgtle of MO-3 7 Wf-llO 92789 e 1210 VQAS PestPCBs reg AQ407AQ422 8 S-3 92889 1002 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ408AQ423 9 S-13 92889 sect 1004 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ409AQ424 Duplicate sample of S-3 10 S-6 92889 sect 0840 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ410AQ425 11 S-9 92889 euro 1610 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ411AQ426 12 raquof-TBl 92789 1245 VQAS NA AQ412 Trip Blank 13 SW-TB2 92789 e 1300 VQAS NA AQ413 Trip Blank 14 HW-101 92789 1530 Metals NA MAL544 Performance Eval Saofle 15 MW-102 92789 e 1545 Metals NA MAL545 Performance Eval Sample
Legend VQAs - Volatile Organic Analyses GW^ - Groundwater AQ401 - AQ prefix is Organic Traffic Report Ntmdber MAL540 - HAL prefix is Inorganic Traffic Number BNAs - BasetleutralAcid Extractable SW^ - Surface Water NA - Not i^licable
(3)
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
AQ-Organic traffic report number
MAL-Inorganic traffic report nuinber
lpoundSQSL
^ - OVERBUROEN WELL
- ^ - SHALLOW BEDROCK W J
bull - BARCAD SAMPLER
O - DUG WfELl
e JETTED BORING AND WELL POINT
= SURFACE WATER ELEVATION LOCATION
R - REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING WEIL
~ ~ - ELEVATION IN FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL
KJ QUINN CO
^ STE AREA MONITORING WELL
ft STREAM ELEVATION LOCATIONS
bullMZcE
MOnOLO RIFS
yaiiin
KJ QUINN CO
OFF-SITE MONITORING WELL
LOCATIONS
MOTTOLO RIFS
WBms-FIG 2 18581
AQ-Organic traffic report number
22 Preservatiwi of Sanples
Sanples analyzed for volatile organics were shipped pre-preserved with 11 l ^ roch lo r i c acid (HCL) VOA sanples were collected in two 40 ml glass v ia l s
Samples analyzed for metals were shipped in a one l i t e r polyethylene bottle containing n i t r ic add (HNQ ) All metal sanples with the exception of MAL544 (M9-101) and MAL545 (MW-102) were field f i l t e r e d by Balsam with a Nalge punp equipped with a 045 micron f i l t e r Samples MAL544 and MAL545 vere performance evaltiation samples submitted to FPC by Lisa Gatton Vidulich Region 2 deputy program officer FPC does not know v ^ t h e r these samples contained n i t r i c acid as a preservative The content of these samples was unknown to FPC
Sanples analyzed for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs were shipped unpreserved in 80 oz sabet glass jugs
23 Quality Assurance Sanples
FPC submitted two t r i p blades for analyses of vo la t i l e organics These sanples were fil led vi th d i s t i l l e d water on September 26 1989 and b rou^ t to the s i te viere they were logged in an the t r a f f i c report and chain-of-custody forms as SW-TBl and SW-TB2 The t r a f f i c report numbers assigned to these sanples are AQ412 and AQ413 respectively
A duplicate groundwater saiple and a surface water sanple were collected a t M0-3SR and S-3 respectively The duplicate groundwater sample was labeled as HQ-35D and the duplicate surface water sanple was labeled as S-13 on the t r a f f i c reports and chain-of-custody forms
At 0W-4SR FPC collected additioned sanple volume for the laboratories to conduct a matrix spike and a matrix spike dupl icate (MSMSD) analysis Triple the volune was collected for v o l a t i l e organics and BNAs and twice the volume for metals as required by EPAs sanple management office (SNQ)
FPC received a ca l l from Jim Sullivan of ESAT an September 29 1989 Hr Sullivan informed Hike Kulbersh tha t lEA laboratory contacted SMO the morning of Septenber 29 1989 to inform them that there wasn t sufficient volume for lEA to perform the MSMSD on the PesticidePCBs fraction At approxinately 1100 am Mr Sullivan contacted Mike KTilbersh for a second time to inform him that the issue was being resolved and that one of tbe sanples requiring analysis for PesticidesPCBs would be used to perform the MSMSD analys is In order to do t h i s less volume would be used for the analysis of the sanple
(6)
bull gt gt bull - ^ ^ J - S - ^ bull bull bull bull bull ~ bull bull - ^ J f ^ 1 bull i
30 Bethods for Collecting Sanples
Prior to collecting groundvater sanples a two person Balsam team vent around the study area and measured the depth to water total veil depth and recorded the diameter of the monitoring wells Given this informatioi the sanpling crews were able to determine the necessary volune required to adequately purge the wells At a minimum three times the well volume was purged
Depending cn the diameter of the well Balsam used a 15 or a 30 inch diameter FVC bailer attached to a nylon cord All off-site bedrock wells were purged using a punp At monitoring well N9-18D FPC deserved that the water level in the well was pumped down nearly 50 feet prior to sanpling After the well was adequately purged two bailer volumes were wasted to the ground prior to sanpling At the locations v^re FPC collected split sanples with Balsam it was protocol that VQA bottles vere filled first followed by BNAs and PesticidePCBs and then inorganics Balsams sanpling teams collected extra volume in order to determine pH temperature and conductivity of the sanple Temperature and conductivity were determined inmediately after collecting the sanples sanples analyzed for p a were brou^ back to the staging area FPC observed that at every monitoring well location Balsams field crew ran a headspace test cm the purged water Ifcthe purged water elicited a HNu reading exceeding 10 parts per million (ppm) the water was drummed if not the water was dunped to the ground At well CW-4SR the headspace reading of the water sample was 17 ppm
Surface water sanples were obtained by submerging the bottles below the water surface All saqgtles were filled with the bottles facing upstream Care was taken in all cases that saiqples analyzed for VQAs didnt entrap any air bubbles Table 2 contains pH temperature and conductivity measurements for those sanples in which FPC collected splits
At sanple location S-6 FPC collected a sanple for analysis of VQAs and PesticidePCBs However (one of Balsams VQA vials broke after tightening the lid Balsam returned to this location and collected two additional VQA vials within ten minutes FPC didnt discard their sample and resanple
At each sanple location FPC recorded on a data description form pertinent field observations this information is provided in Apendix 3
(7)
I TABLE 2
Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire
pB Tenperature and Conductivity Measurements for Split Sanples
Round II Groundwater and Surface Water Sanpling September 27 and 28 1989
saricN NUHBER
STATION LOCATION BH
TTMP
_degc_ CONDUCT UMHOSCM
1 nw-8S 59 8 90 2 MM-13D 58 10 120 3 0W-4SR 6 1 14 360 4 n ^ l 8 D 66 12 208 56 MO-3SRMO-35D 6 3 8 5 220 7 MW-llD 58 15 45 89 S-3S-13 54 7 15
10 S-6 53 6 20 11 S-9 5 5 10 50
pH tenperature and conductivity was not recorded for trip blaiAs and performance evaluations sanples
(8)
bullm W raquo T ^rr
40 Sanple Paperwork and Shipping of Coolers
After collecting a sanple FPC logged the sample in on the diain-of-custody forms and traffic reports Information pertaining to sanpling time and date location preservative traffic number and analyte was recorded on each sample container and tag The bottles were sealed with strapping tape and custody seals Sanples were then placed in coolers and cushioned against breaking using absorbent material Sanples were kept cool using reusable ice packs
Two copies of the traffic reports and a copy of the chain-of-custody forms were sealed in t h e xpper lid of the cooler Two signed custody seals were placed an the coolers which were taped shut with strapping tape Ccpies of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms are provided in Afpendix 4
Sanples were shipped via Federal Express Ttie airbill number for each laboratory is as follows
Aquatec Inc - 4173910241 lEA - 4173910215 Chemtech Consulting Group - 4173910226
50 Ccmclusions
FPC collected all samples as anticipated FPC telefrfioned SMO on September 29 1989 to inform them that all sanples were shipped and that Case 12791 could be closed out
FPC feels that Balsam followed their sanpling and analysis plan vrtien collecting environmental sanples FPC believes that wells were adequately purged prior to sanpling and that purged water was adequately screened with an HNu prior to disposal Water levels and depth of the well were accurately measured to dthin 001 Care was taken by Balsam in not stirring up sediment prior to sanpling surface water
At 350 pm on September 29 1989 Nike Kulbersh received a call from Cindy Schreyer of SNQ Ms Schreyer informed Mr Kulbersh that the traffic n a a t e t B for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs would have to be renumbered and that a revised organic traffic report would have to be resubmitted to lEA and SMO The reason for revising the traffic report is that there nust be two distinctly different traffic report numbers for each laboratory FPC conplied with SNQ and sent a revised organic traffic report to lEA
Finally FPC was informed by Balsam that they were using Aquatech laboratories to analyze their sanples FPC requests that prior to the third round of groundwater ar^ surface water sanpling Balsam inform EPA as to gt^t laboratory (ies) they are planning to use so that FPC doesnt send their sanples to the same labs
(9)
h ^ ^ ^ I bull - - v - y y bull- bull bullbullbull-bull bull ^^^-~-V--V bullbullbullbullbull - bull bullbull^^^^^^v^^y^-^vgt shy
APPENDIX 1
Letter from Balsam to EPA September 15 1989
I bull|UillPMJLf
I rbullyyyyyli^^-ybull w^mrnr^^shy
I I I I I I t I 1
4BALSAM ErwennQ btvinrantrtti Scire amp M u i M Hygim
MfiliiaiRMtf 8laquollaquomNH8Q79
September 15 1989 Balsam Project 618G830
Mr R(tfer Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-GAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agen^ Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massadhufietts 02203
RE Recommendations for tlio Second Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)
Dear Mr Duwart
Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) has reviewed validated analytical data generated from the Hrst round of ground water surface water and sediment sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during April 1989 The purpose of this letter U to briefly discuss the analytical results the significance of the results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the second round of sampling The tables and figures referred to in this letter were provided to you during the progress meeting on September 22 1989 Sampling locations are indicated on Figures 1 2 and 3 Data reviewed included analytical results for Hazardous Substance List (HSL) volatile organic compound analyses (VOCs) HSL semivolatile organic compound analyses HSL pcstiddePCB analyses and HSL inorganic parameter analyses Summaries of the parameters detected in each sample are provided in the previously submitted drafl Tables 1 2 and 8 General diemistary parameters including chloride sulfate nitrate as N nitrite as N alkalinity biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were also analyzed at many locations Ground water from selected wells was also analyzed for total organic carbon (TOO and total and fecal coliform Tables 4 and 5 provided a summaiy of the general diemistry results
As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the second sampling round reported concentrations were compared to available federal or state standards or guidelines and trends or anomalies in data were noted Tle results of this data review and our recommendations for parameters to indude in thc second romd sampling program are sununarized below
BALSAM ENVlftONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
Balsam Prefect 6186830 Septemiber 161989 Page 2
HSL VolatUe Organic Compound Analyses
V0Clt6 were detected in twenty of the thirty-six monitoring wells sampled VOCs were confirmed present only ia on-site monitoring wells and consisted primarUy of chlorinated and aromatic compounds IndudinglTlHdichlagroethane^mdash ~ r dichloroethane 111-trichloroothane trichloroethene tolueacL xylenes and ethylbenzene Methyl-t-butyl-ether (MTBE) was not reportoa present above detection limits in any samples VOCs were reported to be detected at two of the ten surface water sampling locations (S-3 and S-9) boUi located in the lower swaleBrook A area VOCs were reported to be detected at five of the eight sediment sampling locations (S-l S-2 S-S S-9 and S-10)
HSL Semivolatile Organic Compound Analyses
HSL semivolatile organic compounds were reported to be present at low concentrations in ground water samples from four wells located at the base of the former disposal area (M0-2DR 0W-2SR 0W-2DR and CKW-4SRX Low concentrations of bb (2-e(hylhczyl) phthalate were also reported present in samplesfirom six weUs located on site and off site (MW-15S MW-15D MW-12S MW-13S MW-13D and M0-4D) Naphthalene and acenaphthene were reported present in ground water samples fi^m wells MW-15S and M0-4S respectively at low concentrations Bis (2-ethylhci^l) phthalate was the only semivolatile compound reported to be present in two of the ten surface water samples (S-2 and S-5) Three of the eight sediment samples contained semivolatile organic compounds Benzoic add and di-n-butylphuialate were reported to be present in one sediment sample (S-9) and only di-n-butylphthalate was detected In two sediment samples (S-2 and S-4)
HSL PesticidePCB Analyses
PCBs were reported to be present below contract required detection limits (CRDLs) but above instrument detection limits Ooss than 05 ppb) in ground water samples collectedfitgtm Umx wells located at the base of the former drum disposal area and in the dearing north of the swale (0W-2SR 0W-2DR 0W-8R and MW-llD) PCBt were reported to be present in six of tiie ten surface water samples collected Oess than 1 ppb) from the swale Brook A and the Exeter River (S-l S-2 S-5 8-8 S-9 and S-10) One sediment sample (S-10) collected at the base of the piggeiY waste pile was reported to conlak the pesticide 44shyDDE at a concentration less than 15 ppb
HSL Inorganic Parameter Analysoa
Results of HSL inorganic paramcta analyses were compared to state or federal maximum contaminant limits primary or secondary drinking yenrater standards and EPA Ambient Water Quality (Mtcria as appropriate Based upon these comparisons reported concentrations of arsenic iron and manganese in ground water samples exceeded guidelines for at least one parameter bi samples from
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC
r Balsam Project 6186830 September 151989 Page 8
filVeen wells located both on site and off site The only elevated arsenic concentration reported in an off-site sample was from MW-19D Results for surface water samples indicated iron manganese or silver exceeded guidelines ior_at least one parameter atfive j f the ien sampling locatJona It diould be noted that inm and manganese standardsarc aesthetic andjgtot health based ~ guidelines
Results of sediment analyses were compared to a United States Cieological Survey (USOS) reference document (USGS Professional Paper 1270) vHiidt jM^vides average element concentrations in soils for the eastem United States Results rexjorled for the sediment data Indicated above average concentrations of arsenic barium cobalt lead manganese nidcel and xinc at one sediment sampling location locatisd at Ihe tose of the piggery waste jrfle (S-10) However elevated concentrations were not present in data collected at downstream sampling locatiltms Slightly elevated concentrations of some parameters wore also observed at five other sediment sampling locations
General Chomlstiy Parameters
Total and fecal coliform results for ground water were reported below the available guidelines exduding a result f^m one off-site well (MW-16D) Results for sulfate chloride nitrate and nitrite in ground water were all reported at concenlratioas below available state or federal guidelines Aivomalies were not observed in Uie results for TOC analyses Alkalinity results in ground water were reported below state guidelines however relatively higher concentrations of this parameter wore noted in samples com wells whidi also had relatively high reported values of VOCs (0W2SR 0W2DR 0W-4SR 0W-4DR M0-2S and M0-3SR) A similar trend was observed for the results from BOD and COD analyses
PROPOSED AXALYHCAL SUITE
VOCs appear to be the primary contaminants identified in samples collected during the April samplingprogram noting that MTBE was not Identified present in any sanples iWefore VCXS should be included la the second sampling round whidi wiU indude the same monitoring well and surface water sampling loeaUons ss the first sampling round
Tlie semi-volatile organic compounds identified in thc first round were reported a t relatively low concentrations and primarily fi^m samples collected in areas where notable concentrations of V(Xs were also identified Ihe other az^as where semivolatile organic compounds were estimated to be present eudi as samples from well lfW-13 and off-site locations were generallv at concentrations below contract dctectiim limits and are common environmental eontaminants not Ukely to be related to activities at the Mottolo site Therefore BsJsam proposes to collect and analvxe a limited number of samples fitgtm wells where the presence of semivolatile organic compounds firom site activities was indicated
bull ^ - bull [J I I i raquo l I X - bull W i
bull bull t j 3- n j ^ f l bdquo i i w g u Wraquo
i
I
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
r
^
Balsam PntJect 6165830
September 15 1089 Page 4
The results of the pestiddePCB analyses Indicate that trace concentrations of Aroclor 1260 were detected In several surface water and ground water samples a t concentration below 1 ppb Therefore samples will be collected f^ PCB
-analysis fiomJocations where P(2Bs vere previously detected^-as-wdl as J ^ _ limited number of locations where PCBs were not r epor t^ present ~ - ~
l l i e inorganic parameter analytical results indicate elevated concentrations of arsenic Iron and manganese at several monitoring well locations Based upon the review of these data Balsam proposes to include arsenic in the second round analytical suite since this parameter appears to correlate best wlUi areas of on-site contamination and belaquoiuse of relatively low toxidty of iron and manganese
Analytical results for the general chemistrv parameters were generally within accepted limits for naturally occurring media and significant trends or anomalies In these data were not noted Therefore resampling and analyses fbr the general chemisliy parameters would not likely provide significant additional information to thc Mottolo data base or improve site diaracterization efforts
A summary of the proposed second round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attadied Table 1 Several locations whore contaminants were not detected in Uie f^st sampling round will also be resampled for selected parameters to confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We arc scheduled to conduct sampling activities the wedi of Septembor 26 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this woric on schedule Please do not hesitate io contact Eric Wood or either of the undersigned if you have any questions
Sincerely
1 ltcQ Timothy a Stone CPG Bl Prqjeet Manager
Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager
c c J Pdtonen (Stark ft Peltonen) M Robinette (NHDES)
lt90^415
Attachment
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
TABLE OF CCNTENTS
TRIP REPORT
RAYMOND NEH HAMPSHIRE
Section Page
10 Introduction 1
20 CLP Laboratories 1
21 Location of Split Samples 2 22 Preservation of Samples 6
23 Quality Assurance Samples 6
30 Methods for Collecting Sanples 7
40 Sample Paperwork and Shitting of Coolers 9
50 Craiclusions 9
Figures
1 Monitoring Wiell Sampling Locations 4
2 Surface Water Sampling and Off-Site Monitoring well Sainpling Locations 5
Tables
1 Round II Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling Information 3
2 pa Conductivity and Ten^rature Measurements for Split Samples 8
Appendix
1 Letter from Balsam to EPA September 15 1989 2 Well Construction Details 3 Data Description Forms 4 Traffic Reports amp Chain-of-Custody Forms
Hraquo||r^t tBuwiy^T - ^ ViV v-vT-
I TRIP REPORT
10
20
HOTTOIO SITE
RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
Introduction
Consnencing on September 27 and ending on Septenter 28 1989 CDM Federal Programs Corporation (FPC) ccHiducted technical oversi^t of the second round of groundwater and surface water sampling at the Mottolo Site located in Raymond New Hampshire Hike Kulbersh and Bill Holden both of FPC were present for oversi^t activities
Based on round I data a refined suite of analytes were chosen The rational for the changes made at each well and surface water location were discussed with EPA prior to sanqpling and are documented by Balsam Environmental Corporation (Balsam) in a letter to the primary contact Roger Duwart on Septentber 15 1989 (Appendix 1)
In addition to sanpling activities Balsam installed two additional monitoring well couplets The monitoring wells are located south of the cement pad in the vicinity of MW-7 and MW-8 The purpose for installing these wells was to ascertain whether or not contaminants are migrating downgradient in a direction not initially anticipated
During oversight of sampling activities FPC observed the installation of monitoring wells MW-21S and MW-21D FPC obtained constructicxi details for these wells information pertaining to constructioi details is provided in Appendix 2
Steve Mangion of EPAs Hydrogeological SiJ jport Section visited the site on September 28 1989 Mr Mangion monitored the installation of monitoring well MW-21S The monitoring wells were installed by Avalanche Soil Exploration of Gorham Maii^ At Hr Duwarts direction oversight of the well installation program was conducted by EPA
CLP Laboratories i
During the two days of saspliijg FPC shipped 13 sauries for volatile organic analyses (VOAs) five samples for pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PestPCBs) analyses one sample for baseheutralacid (BNA) extractable analyses and six sanples for metals analyses
(1)
-t H^ gtraquobull J bull rv if(iWiflaquo4_gtraquo
All split samples were shipped under Case nutober 12791 fPC shipped the samples to the following laboratories
Volatile Organics
1 Aquatech Inc 75 Green Mountain Drive S Burlington VT 05403 (M7(802) 658-107658-10744 Attn Janlne Banks
I BNAs amp PestPCBs
lEA 1901 N Harrison Avenue Cary NC 27511 (919) 467-9919 Attn Gary Gilleland
Inorganics
Chemtech Consulting Gtcnxp 360 West llth Street New York NY 10014 (212) 255-2100 i Attn Kostas Lambiris
21 Location of Split Sanples
Table 1 presented below indicates the station number location date and time of collection eunalyses conducted on the sample sanple matrix and corresponding CLP traffic number assigned to each saiqple al(xig with a ccxmtent field Figures 1 and 2 identify the locations from where split samples were obtained On September 29 1989 Michael Kulbersh received a call from Cindfy Schreyer of EPAs Saaple Management Office (SMO) Ms Schreyer informed Mr Kulbersh that since analyses for extractables and PesticidesPCBs went to a different laboratory than the VGA sangtles that two distinctly different traffic numbers must be assigned to eadi sample Therefore at SMOs request FPC Federal Expressed to lEA Labs a revised Organic Traffic Report under the section special handling the original traffic nvmibers assigned to the 6anfgtles were referenced
(2)
TABLE 1 MOTTOLO SITE RAYMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING INFORMATION SEPTE31BER 27 AND 28 1989
STATION STATION DATETIME ANALYSES SAMPLE CLP TRAFFIC NUMBER LOCATION COLLECTION CONDUCTED NATRIX NUMBER OOMNENT FIELD
1 MWmdash6S 92789 1545 VQAs Metals AQ40lMAL540 2 Mlaquo-13D 92789 e 1240 VQAS GW AQ402 3 0W-4SR 92889 1520 VQAS BNAs Metals i GW AQ403A(2421nAL541 MSMSD 4 MW-18D 92889 e 1405 VQAS GW AQ404 5 N0-3SR 92889 e 1300 VQAS Metals GW AQ405HAL542 6 MO-35D 92889 e 1302 VQAS Metals -GW - AQ406HAL543 Duplicate saafgtle of MO-3 7 Wf-llO 92789 e 1210 VQAS PestPCBs reg AQ407AQ422 8 S-3 92889 1002 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ408AQ423 9 S-13 92889 sect 1004 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ409AQ424 Duplicate sample of S-3 10 S-6 92889 sect 0840 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ410AQ425 11 S-9 92889 euro 1610 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ411AQ426 12 raquof-TBl 92789 1245 VQAS NA AQ412 Trip Blank 13 SW-TB2 92789 e 1300 VQAS NA AQ413 Trip Blank 14 HW-101 92789 1530 Metals NA MAL544 Performance Eval Saofle 15 MW-102 92789 e 1545 Metals NA MAL545 Performance Eval Sample
Legend VQAs - Volatile Organic Analyses GW^ - Groundwater AQ401 - AQ prefix is Organic Traffic Report Ntmdber MAL540 - HAL prefix is Inorganic Traffic Number BNAs - BasetleutralAcid Extractable SW^ - Surface Water NA - Not i^licable
(3)
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
AQ-Organic traffic report number
MAL-Inorganic traffic report nuinber
lpoundSQSL
^ - OVERBUROEN WELL
- ^ - SHALLOW BEDROCK W J
bull - BARCAD SAMPLER
O - DUG WfELl
e JETTED BORING AND WELL POINT
= SURFACE WATER ELEVATION LOCATION
R - REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING WEIL
~ ~ - ELEVATION IN FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL
KJ QUINN CO
^ STE AREA MONITORING WELL
ft STREAM ELEVATION LOCATIONS
bullMZcE
MOnOLO RIFS
yaiiin
KJ QUINN CO
OFF-SITE MONITORING WELL
LOCATIONS
MOTTOLO RIFS
WBms-FIG 2 18581
AQ-Organic traffic report number
22 Preservatiwi of Sanples
Sanples analyzed for volatile organics were shipped pre-preserved with 11 l ^ roch lo r i c acid (HCL) VOA sanples were collected in two 40 ml glass v ia l s
Samples analyzed for metals were shipped in a one l i t e r polyethylene bottle containing n i t r ic add (HNQ ) All metal sanples with the exception of MAL544 (M9-101) and MAL545 (MW-102) were field f i l t e r e d by Balsam with a Nalge punp equipped with a 045 micron f i l t e r Samples MAL544 and MAL545 vere performance evaltiation samples submitted to FPC by Lisa Gatton Vidulich Region 2 deputy program officer FPC does not know v ^ t h e r these samples contained n i t r i c acid as a preservative The content of these samples was unknown to FPC
Sanples analyzed for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs were shipped unpreserved in 80 oz sabet glass jugs
23 Quality Assurance Sanples
FPC submitted two t r i p blades for analyses of vo la t i l e organics These sanples were fil led vi th d i s t i l l e d water on September 26 1989 and b rou^ t to the s i te viere they were logged in an the t r a f f i c report and chain-of-custody forms as SW-TBl and SW-TB2 The t r a f f i c report numbers assigned to these sanples are AQ412 and AQ413 respectively
A duplicate groundwater saiple and a surface water sanple were collected a t M0-3SR and S-3 respectively The duplicate groundwater sample was labeled as HQ-35D and the duplicate surface water sanple was labeled as S-13 on the t r a f f i c reports and chain-of-custody forms
At 0W-4SR FPC collected additioned sanple volume for the laboratories to conduct a matrix spike and a matrix spike dupl icate (MSMSD) analysis Triple the volune was collected for v o l a t i l e organics and BNAs and twice the volume for metals as required by EPAs sanple management office (SNQ)
FPC received a ca l l from Jim Sullivan of ESAT an September 29 1989 Hr Sullivan informed Hike Kulbersh tha t lEA laboratory contacted SMO the morning of Septenber 29 1989 to inform them that there wasn t sufficient volume for lEA to perform the MSMSD on the PesticidePCBs fraction At approxinately 1100 am Mr Sullivan contacted Mike KTilbersh for a second time to inform him that the issue was being resolved and that one of tbe sanples requiring analysis for PesticidesPCBs would be used to perform the MSMSD analys is In order to do t h i s less volume would be used for the analysis of the sanple
(6)
bull gt gt bull - ^ ^ J - S - ^ bull bull bull bull bull ~ bull bull - ^ J f ^ 1 bull i
30 Bethods for Collecting Sanples
Prior to collecting groundvater sanples a two person Balsam team vent around the study area and measured the depth to water total veil depth and recorded the diameter of the monitoring wells Given this informatioi the sanpling crews were able to determine the necessary volune required to adequately purge the wells At a minimum three times the well volume was purged
Depending cn the diameter of the well Balsam used a 15 or a 30 inch diameter FVC bailer attached to a nylon cord All off-site bedrock wells were purged using a punp At monitoring well N9-18D FPC deserved that the water level in the well was pumped down nearly 50 feet prior to sanpling After the well was adequately purged two bailer volumes were wasted to the ground prior to sanpling At the locations v^re FPC collected split sanples with Balsam it was protocol that VQA bottles vere filled first followed by BNAs and PesticidePCBs and then inorganics Balsams sanpling teams collected extra volume in order to determine pH temperature and conductivity of the sanple Temperature and conductivity were determined inmediately after collecting the sanples sanples analyzed for p a were brou^ back to the staging area FPC observed that at every monitoring well location Balsams field crew ran a headspace test cm the purged water Ifcthe purged water elicited a HNu reading exceeding 10 parts per million (ppm) the water was drummed if not the water was dunped to the ground At well CW-4SR the headspace reading of the water sample was 17 ppm
Surface water sanples were obtained by submerging the bottles below the water surface All saqgtles were filled with the bottles facing upstream Care was taken in all cases that saiqples analyzed for VQAs didnt entrap any air bubbles Table 2 contains pH temperature and conductivity measurements for those sanples in which FPC collected splits
At sanple location S-6 FPC collected a sanple for analysis of VQAs and PesticidePCBs However (one of Balsams VQA vials broke after tightening the lid Balsam returned to this location and collected two additional VQA vials within ten minutes FPC didnt discard their sample and resanple
At each sanple location FPC recorded on a data description form pertinent field observations this information is provided in Apendix 3
(7)
I TABLE 2
Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire
pB Tenperature and Conductivity Measurements for Split Sanples
Round II Groundwater and Surface Water Sanpling September 27 and 28 1989
saricN NUHBER
STATION LOCATION BH
TTMP
_degc_ CONDUCT UMHOSCM
1 nw-8S 59 8 90 2 MM-13D 58 10 120 3 0W-4SR 6 1 14 360 4 n ^ l 8 D 66 12 208 56 MO-3SRMO-35D 6 3 8 5 220 7 MW-llD 58 15 45 89 S-3S-13 54 7 15
10 S-6 53 6 20 11 S-9 5 5 10 50
pH tenperature and conductivity was not recorded for trip blaiAs and performance evaluations sanples
(8)
bullm W raquo T ^rr
40 Sanple Paperwork and Shipping of Coolers
After collecting a sanple FPC logged the sample in on the diain-of-custody forms and traffic reports Information pertaining to sanpling time and date location preservative traffic number and analyte was recorded on each sample container and tag The bottles were sealed with strapping tape and custody seals Sanples were then placed in coolers and cushioned against breaking using absorbent material Sanples were kept cool using reusable ice packs
Two copies of the traffic reports and a copy of the chain-of-custody forms were sealed in t h e xpper lid of the cooler Two signed custody seals were placed an the coolers which were taped shut with strapping tape Ccpies of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms are provided in Afpendix 4
Sanples were shipped via Federal Express Ttie airbill number for each laboratory is as follows
Aquatec Inc - 4173910241 lEA - 4173910215 Chemtech Consulting Group - 4173910226
50 Ccmclusions
FPC collected all samples as anticipated FPC telefrfioned SMO on September 29 1989 to inform them that all sanples were shipped and that Case 12791 could be closed out
FPC feels that Balsam followed their sanpling and analysis plan vrtien collecting environmental sanples FPC believes that wells were adequately purged prior to sanpling and that purged water was adequately screened with an HNu prior to disposal Water levels and depth of the well were accurately measured to dthin 001 Care was taken by Balsam in not stirring up sediment prior to sanpling surface water
At 350 pm on September 29 1989 Nike Kulbersh received a call from Cindy Schreyer of SNQ Ms Schreyer informed Mr Kulbersh that the traffic n a a t e t B for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs would have to be renumbered and that a revised organic traffic report would have to be resubmitted to lEA and SMO The reason for revising the traffic report is that there nust be two distinctly different traffic report numbers for each laboratory FPC conplied with SNQ and sent a revised organic traffic report to lEA
Finally FPC was informed by Balsam that they were using Aquatech laboratories to analyze their sanples FPC requests that prior to the third round of groundwater ar^ surface water sanpling Balsam inform EPA as to gt^t laboratory (ies) they are planning to use so that FPC doesnt send their sanples to the same labs
(9)
h ^ ^ ^ I bull - - v - y y bull- bull bullbullbull-bull bull ^^^-~-V--V bullbullbullbullbull - bull bullbull^^^^^^v^^y^-^vgt shy
APPENDIX 1
Letter from Balsam to EPA September 15 1989
I bull|UillPMJLf
I rbullyyyyyli^^-ybull w^mrnr^^shy
I I I I I I t I 1
4BALSAM ErwennQ btvinrantrtti Scire amp M u i M Hygim
MfiliiaiRMtf 8laquollaquomNH8Q79
September 15 1989 Balsam Project 618G830
Mr R(tfer Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-GAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agen^ Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massadhufietts 02203
RE Recommendations for tlio Second Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)
Dear Mr Duwart
Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) has reviewed validated analytical data generated from the Hrst round of ground water surface water and sediment sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during April 1989 The purpose of this letter U to briefly discuss the analytical results the significance of the results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the second round of sampling The tables and figures referred to in this letter were provided to you during the progress meeting on September 22 1989 Sampling locations are indicated on Figures 1 2 and 3 Data reviewed included analytical results for Hazardous Substance List (HSL) volatile organic compound analyses (VOCs) HSL semivolatile organic compound analyses HSL pcstiddePCB analyses and HSL inorganic parameter analyses Summaries of the parameters detected in each sample are provided in the previously submitted drafl Tables 1 2 and 8 General diemistary parameters including chloride sulfate nitrate as N nitrite as N alkalinity biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were also analyzed at many locations Ground water from selected wells was also analyzed for total organic carbon (TOO and total and fecal coliform Tables 4 and 5 provided a summaiy of the general diemistry results
As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the second sampling round reported concentrations were compared to available federal or state standards or guidelines and trends or anomalies in data were noted Tle results of this data review and our recommendations for parameters to indude in thc second romd sampling program are sununarized below
BALSAM ENVlftONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
Balsam Prefect 6186830 Septemiber 161989 Page 2
HSL VolatUe Organic Compound Analyses
V0Clt6 were detected in twenty of the thirty-six monitoring wells sampled VOCs were confirmed present only ia on-site monitoring wells and consisted primarUy of chlorinated and aromatic compounds IndudinglTlHdichlagroethane^mdash ~ r dichloroethane 111-trichloroothane trichloroethene tolueacL xylenes and ethylbenzene Methyl-t-butyl-ether (MTBE) was not reportoa present above detection limits in any samples VOCs were reported to be detected at two of the ten surface water sampling locations (S-3 and S-9) boUi located in the lower swaleBrook A area VOCs were reported to be detected at five of the eight sediment sampling locations (S-l S-2 S-S S-9 and S-10)
HSL Semivolatile Organic Compound Analyses
HSL semivolatile organic compounds were reported to be present at low concentrations in ground water samples from four wells located at the base of the former disposal area (M0-2DR 0W-2SR 0W-2DR and CKW-4SRX Low concentrations of bb (2-e(hylhczyl) phthalate were also reported present in samplesfirom six weUs located on site and off site (MW-15S MW-15D MW-12S MW-13S MW-13D and M0-4D) Naphthalene and acenaphthene were reported present in ground water samples fi^m wells MW-15S and M0-4S respectively at low concentrations Bis (2-ethylhci^l) phthalate was the only semivolatile compound reported to be present in two of the ten surface water samples (S-2 and S-5) Three of the eight sediment samples contained semivolatile organic compounds Benzoic add and di-n-butylphuialate were reported to be present in one sediment sample (S-9) and only di-n-butylphthalate was detected In two sediment samples (S-2 and S-4)
HSL PesticidePCB Analyses
PCBs were reported to be present below contract required detection limits (CRDLs) but above instrument detection limits Ooss than 05 ppb) in ground water samples collectedfitgtm Umx wells located at the base of the former drum disposal area and in the dearing north of the swale (0W-2SR 0W-2DR 0W-8R and MW-llD) PCBt were reported to be present in six of tiie ten surface water samples collected Oess than 1 ppb) from the swale Brook A and the Exeter River (S-l S-2 S-5 8-8 S-9 and S-10) One sediment sample (S-10) collected at the base of the piggeiY waste pile was reported to conlak the pesticide 44shyDDE at a concentration less than 15 ppb
HSL Inorganic Parameter Analysoa
Results of HSL inorganic paramcta analyses were compared to state or federal maximum contaminant limits primary or secondary drinking yenrater standards and EPA Ambient Water Quality (Mtcria as appropriate Based upon these comparisons reported concentrations of arsenic iron and manganese in ground water samples exceeded guidelines for at least one parameter bi samples from
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC
r Balsam Project 6186830 September 151989 Page 8
filVeen wells located both on site and off site The only elevated arsenic concentration reported in an off-site sample was from MW-19D Results for surface water samples indicated iron manganese or silver exceeded guidelines ior_at least one parameter atfive j f the ien sampling locatJona It diould be noted that inm and manganese standardsarc aesthetic andjgtot health based ~ guidelines
Results of sediment analyses were compared to a United States Cieological Survey (USOS) reference document (USGS Professional Paper 1270) vHiidt jM^vides average element concentrations in soils for the eastem United States Results rexjorled for the sediment data Indicated above average concentrations of arsenic barium cobalt lead manganese nidcel and xinc at one sediment sampling location locatisd at Ihe tose of the piggery waste jrfle (S-10) However elevated concentrations were not present in data collected at downstream sampling locatiltms Slightly elevated concentrations of some parameters wore also observed at five other sediment sampling locations
General Chomlstiy Parameters
Total and fecal coliform results for ground water were reported below the available guidelines exduding a result f^m one off-site well (MW-16D) Results for sulfate chloride nitrate and nitrite in ground water were all reported at concenlratioas below available state or federal guidelines Aivomalies were not observed in Uie results for TOC analyses Alkalinity results in ground water were reported below state guidelines however relatively higher concentrations of this parameter wore noted in samples com wells whidi also had relatively high reported values of VOCs (0W2SR 0W2DR 0W-4SR 0W-4DR M0-2S and M0-3SR) A similar trend was observed for the results from BOD and COD analyses
PROPOSED AXALYHCAL SUITE
VOCs appear to be the primary contaminants identified in samples collected during the April samplingprogram noting that MTBE was not Identified present in any sanples iWefore VCXS should be included la the second sampling round whidi wiU indude the same monitoring well and surface water sampling loeaUons ss the first sampling round
Tlie semi-volatile organic compounds identified in thc first round were reported a t relatively low concentrations and primarily fi^m samples collected in areas where notable concentrations of V(Xs were also identified Ihe other az^as where semivolatile organic compounds were estimated to be present eudi as samples from well lfW-13 and off-site locations were generallv at concentrations below contract dctectiim limits and are common environmental eontaminants not Ukely to be related to activities at the Mottolo site Therefore BsJsam proposes to collect and analvxe a limited number of samples fitgtm wells where the presence of semivolatile organic compounds firom site activities was indicated
bull ^ - bull [J I I i raquo l I X - bull W i
bull bull t j 3- n j ^ f l bdquo i i w g u Wraquo
i
I
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
r
^
Balsam PntJect 6165830
September 15 1089 Page 4
The results of the pestiddePCB analyses Indicate that trace concentrations of Aroclor 1260 were detected In several surface water and ground water samples a t concentration below 1 ppb Therefore samples will be collected f^ PCB
-analysis fiomJocations where P(2Bs vere previously detected^-as-wdl as J ^ _ limited number of locations where PCBs were not r epor t^ present ~ - ~
l l i e inorganic parameter analytical results indicate elevated concentrations of arsenic Iron and manganese at several monitoring well locations Based upon the review of these data Balsam proposes to include arsenic in the second round analytical suite since this parameter appears to correlate best wlUi areas of on-site contamination and belaquoiuse of relatively low toxidty of iron and manganese
Analytical results for the general chemistrv parameters were generally within accepted limits for naturally occurring media and significant trends or anomalies In these data were not noted Therefore resampling and analyses fbr the general chemisliy parameters would not likely provide significant additional information to thc Mottolo data base or improve site diaracterization efforts
A summary of the proposed second round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attadied Table 1 Several locations whore contaminants were not detected in Uie f^st sampling round will also be resampled for selected parameters to confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We arc scheduled to conduct sampling activities the wedi of Septembor 26 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this woric on schedule Please do not hesitate io contact Eric Wood or either of the undersigned if you have any questions
Sincerely
1 ltcQ Timothy a Stone CPG Bl Prqjeet Manager
Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager
c c J Pdtonen (Stark ft Peltonen) M Robinette (NHDES)
lt90^415
Attachment
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
I TRIP REPORT
10
20
HOTTOIO SITE
RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
Introduction
Consnencing on September 27 and ending on Septenter 28 1989 CDM Federal Programs Corporation (FPC) ccHiducted technical oversi^t of the second round of groundwater and surface water sampling at the Mottolo Site located in Raymond New Hampshire Hike Kulbersh and Bill Holden both of FPC were present for oversi^t activities
Based on round I data a refined suite of analytes were chosen The rational for the changes made at each well and surface water location were discussed with EPA prior to sanqpling and are documented by Balsam Environmental Corporation (Balsam) in a letter to the primary contact Roger Duwart on Septentber 15 1989 (Appendix 1)
In addition to sanpling activities Balsam installed two additional monitoring well couplets The monitoring wells are located south of the cement pad in the vicinity of MW-7 and MW-8 The purpose for installing these wells was to ascertain whether or not contaminants are migrating downgradient in a direction not initially anticipated
During oversight of sampling activities FPC observed the installation of monitoring wells MW-21S and MW-21D FPC obtained constructicxi details for these wells information pertaining to constructioi details is provided in Appendix 2
Steve Mangion of EPAs Hydrogeological SiJ jport Section visited the site on September 28 1989 Mr Mangion monitored the installation of monitoring well MW-21S The monitoring wells were installed by Avalanche Soil Exploration of Gorham Maii^ At Hr Duwarts direction oversight of the well installation program was conducted by EPA
CLP Laboratories i
During the two days of saspliijg FPC shipped 13 sauries for volatile organic analyses (VOAs) five samples for pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PestPCBs) analyses one sample for baseheutralacid (BNA) extractable analyses and six sanples for metals analyses
(1)
-t H^ gtraquobull J bull rv if(iWiflaquo4_gtraquo
All split samples were shipped under Case nutober 12791 fPC shipped the samples to the following laboratories
Volatile Organics
1 Aquatech Inc 75 Green Mountain Drive S Burlington VT 05403 (M7(802) 658-107658-10744 Attn Janlne Banks
I BNAs amp PestPCBs
lEA 1901 N Harrison Avenue Cary NC 27511 (919) 467-9919 Attn Gary Gilleland
Inorganics
Chemtech Consulting Gtcnxp 360 West llth Street New York NY 10014 (212) 255-2100 i Attn Kostas Lambiris
21 Location of Split Sanples
Table 1 presented below indicates the station number location date and time of collection eunalyses conducted on the sample sanple matrix and corresponding CLP traffic number assigned to each saiqple al(xig with a ccxmtent field Figures 1 and 2 identify the locations from where split samples were obtained On September 29 1989 Michael Kulbersh received a call from Cindfy Schreyer of EPAs Saaple Management Office (SMO) Ms Schreyer informed Mr Kulbersh that since analyses for extractables and PesticidesPCBs went to a different laboratory than the VGA sangtles that two distinctly different traffic numbers must be assigned to eadi sample Therefore at SMOs request FPC Federal Expressed to lEA Labs a revised Organic Traffic Report under the section special handling the original traffic nvmibers assigned to the 6anfgtles were referenced
(2)
TABLE 1 MOTTOLO SITE RAYMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING INFORMATION SEPTE31BER 27 AND 28 1989
STATION STATION DATETIME ANALYSES SAMPLE CLP TRAFFIC NUMBER LOCATION COLLECTION CONDUCTED NATRIX NUMBER OOMNENT FIELD
1 MWmdash6S 92789 1545 VQAs Metals AQ40lMAL540 2 Mlaquo-13D 92789 e 1240 VQAS GW AQ402 3 0W-4SR 92889 1520 VQAS BNAs Metals i GW AQ403A(2421nAL541 MSMSD 4 MW-18D 92889 e 1405 VQAS GW AQ404 5 N0-3SR 92889 e 1300 VQAS Metals GW AQ405HAL542 6 MO-35D 92889 e 1302 VQAS Metals -GW - AQ406HAL543 Duplicate saafgtle of MO-3 7 Wf-llO 92789 e 1210 VQAS PestPCBs reg AQ407AQ422 8 S-3 92889 1002 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ408AQ423 9 S-13 92889 sect 1004 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ409AQ424 Duplicate sample of S-3 10 S-6 92889 sect 0840 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ410AQ425 11 S-9 92889 euro 1610 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ411AQ426 12 raquof-TBl 92789 1245 VQAS NA AQ412 Trip Blank 13 SW-TB2 92789 e 1300 VQAS NA AQ413 Trip Blank 14 HW-101 92789 1530 Metals NA MAL544 Performance Eval Saofle 15 MW-102 92789 e 1545 Metals NA MAL545 Performance Eval Sample
Legend VQAs - Volatile Organic Analyses GW^ - Groundwater AQ401 - AQ prefix is Organic Traffic Report Ntmdber MAL540 - HAL prefix is Inorganic Traffic Number BNAs - BasetleutralAcid Extractable SW^ - Surface Water NA - Not i^licable
(3)
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
AQ-Organic traffic report number
MAL-Inorganic traffic report nuinber
lpoundSQSL
^ - OVERBUROEN WELL
- ^ - SHALLOW BEDROCK W J
bull - BARCAD SAMPLER
O - DUG WfELl
e JETTED BORING AND WELL POINT
= SURFACE WATER ELEVATION LOCATION
R - REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING WEIL
~ ~ - ELEVATION IN FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL
KJ QUINN CO
^ STE AREA MONITORING WELL
ft STREAM ELEVATION LOCATIONS
bullMZcE
MOnOLO RIFS
yaiiin
KJ QUINN CO
OFF-SITE MONITORING WELL
LOCATIONS
MOTTOLO RIFS
WBms-FIG 2 18581
AQ-Organic traffic report number
22 Preservatiwi of Sanples
Sanples analyzed for volatile organics were shipped pre-preserved with 11 l ^ roch lo r i c acid (HCL) VOA sanples were collected in two 40 ml glass v ia l s
Samples analyzed for metals were shipped in a one l i t e r polyethylene bottle containing n i t r ic add (HNQ ) All metal sanples with the exception of MAL544 (M9-101) and MAL545 (MW-102) were field f i l t e r e d by Balsam with a Nalge punp equipped with a 045 micron f i l t e r Samples MAL544 and MAL545 vere performance evaltiation samples submitted to FPC by Lisa Gatton Vidulich Region 2 deputy program officer FPC does not know v ^ t h e r these samples contained n i t r i c acid as a preservative The content of these samples was unknown to FPC
Sanples analyzed for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs were shipped unpreserved in 80 oz sabet glass jugs
23 Quality Assurance Sanples
FPC submitted two t r i p blades for analyses of vo la t i l e organics These sanples were fil led vi th d i s t i l l e d water on September 26 1989 and b rou^ t to the s i te viere they were logged in an the t r a f f i c report and chain-of-custody forms as SW-TBl and SW-TB2 The t r a f f i c report numbers assigned to these sanples are AQ412 and AQ413 respectively
A duplicate groundwater saiple and a surface water sanple were collected a t M0-3SR and S-3 respectively The duplicate groundwater sample was labeled as HQ-35D and the duplicate surface water sanple was labeled as S-13 on the t r a f f i c reports and chain-of-custody forms
At 0W-4SR FPC collected additioned sanple volume for the laboratories to conduct a matrix spike and a matrix spike dupl icate (MSMSD) analysis Triple the volune was collected for v o l a t i l e organics and BNAs and twice the volume for metals as required by EPAs sanple management office (SNQ)
FPC received a ca l l from Jim Sullivan of ESAT an September 29 1989 Hr Sullivan informed Hike Kulbersh tha t lEA laboratory contacted SMO the morning of Septenber 29 1989 to inform them that there wasn t sufficient volume for lEA to perform the MSMSD on the PesticidePCBs fraction At approxinately 1100 am Mr Sullivan contacted Mike KTilbersh for a second time to inform him that the issue was being resolved and that one of tbe sanples requiring analysis for PesticidesPCBs would be used to perform the MSMSD analys is In order to do t h i s less volume would be used for the analysis of the sanple
(6)
bull gt gt bull - ^ ^ J - S - ^ bull bull bull bull bull ~ bull bull - ^ J f ^ 1 bull i
30 Bethods for Collecting Sanples
Prior to collecting groundvater sanples a two person Balsam team vent around the study area and measured the depth to water total veil depth and recorded the diameter of the monitoring wells Given this informatioi the sanpling crews were able to determine the necessary volune required to adequately purge the wells At a minimum three times the well volume was purged
Depending cn the diameter of the well Balsam used a 15 or a 30 inch diameter FVC bailer attached to a nylon cord All off-site bedrock wells were purged using a punp At monitoring well N9-18D FPC deserved that the water level in the well was pumped down nearly 50 feet prior to sanpling After the well was adequately purged two bailer volumes were wasted to the ground prior to sanpling At the locations v^re FPC collected split sanples with Balsam it was protocol that VQA bottles vere filled first followed by BNAs and PesticidePCBs and then inorganics Balsams sanpling teams collected extra volume in order to determine pH temperature and conductivity of the sanple Temperature and conductivity were determined inmediately after collecting the sanples sanples analyzed for p a were brou^ back to the staging area FPC observed that at every monitoring well location Balsams field crew ran a headspace test cm the purged water Ifcthe purged water elicited a HNu reading exceeding 10 parts per million (ppm) the water was drummed if not the water was dunped to the ground At well CW-4SR the headspace reading of the water sample was 17 ppm
Surface water sanples were obtained by submerging the bottles below the water surface All saqgtles were filled with the bottles facing upstream Care was taken in all cases that saiqples analyzed for VQAs didnt entrap any air bubbles Table 2 contains pH temperature and conductivity measurements for those sanples in which FPC collected splits
At sanple location S-6 FPC collected a sanple for analysis of VQAs and PesticidePCBs However (one of Balsams VQA vials broke after tightening the lid Balsam returned to this location and collected two additional VQA vials within ten minutes FPC didnt discard their sample and resanple
At each sanple location FPC recorded on a data description form pertinent field observations this information is provided in Apendix 3
(7)
I TABLE 2
Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire
pB Tenperature and Conductivity Measurements for Split Sanples
Round II Groundwater and Surface Water Sanpling September 27 and 28 1989
saricN NUHBER
STATION LOCATION BH
TTMP
_degc_ CONDUCT UMHOSCM
1 nw-8S 59 8 90 2 MM-13D 58 10 120 3 0W-4SR 6 1 14 360 4 n ^ l 8 D 66 12 208 56 MO-3SRMO-35D 6 3 8 5 220 7 MW-llD 58 15 45 89 S-3S-13 54 7 15
10 S-6 53 6 20 11 S-9 5 5 10 50
pH tenperature and conductivity was not recorded for trip blaiAs and performance evaluations sanples
(8)
bullm W raquo T ^rr
40 Sanple Paperwork and Shipping of Coolers
After collecting a sanple FPC logged the sample in on the diain-of-custody forms and traffic reports Information pertaining to sanpling time and date location preservative traffic number and analyte was recorded on each sample container and tag The bottles were sealed with strapping tape and custody seals Sanples were then placed in coolers and cushioned against breaking using absorbent material Sanples were kept cool using reusable ice packs
Two copies of the traffic reports and a copy of the chain-of-custody forms were sealed in t h e xpper lid of the cooler Two signed custody seals were placed an the coolers which were taped shut with strapping tape Ccpies of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms are provided in Afpendix 4
Sanples were shipped via Federal Express Ttie airbill number for each laboratory is as follows
Aquatec Inc - 4173910241 lEA - 4173910215 Chemtech Consulting Group - 4173910226
50 Ccmclusions
FPC collected all samples as anticipated FPC telefrfioned SMO on September 29 1989 to inform them that all sanples were shipped and that Case 12791 could be closed out
FPC feels that Balsam followed their sanpling and analysis plan vrtien collecting environmental sanples FPC believes that wells were adequately purged prior to sanpling and that purged water was adequately screened with an HNu prior to disposal Water levels and depth of the well were accurately measured to dthin 001 Care was taken by Balsam in not stirring up sediment prior to sanpling surface water
At 350 pm on September 29 1989 Nike Kulbersh received a call from Cindy Schreyer of SNQ Ms Schreyer informed Mr Kulbersh that the traffic n a a t e t B for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs would have to be renumbered and that a revised organic traffic report would have to be resubmitted to lEA and SMO The reason for revising the traffic report is that there nust be two distinctly different traffic report numbers for each laboratory FPC conplied with SNQ and sent a revised organic traffic report to lEA
Finally FPC was informed by Balsam that they were using Aquatech laboratories to analyze their sanples FPC requests that prior to the third round of groundwater ar^ surface water sanpling Balsam inform EPA as to gt^t laboratory (ies) they are planning to use so that FPC doesnt send their sanples to the same labs
(9)
h ^ ^ ^ I bull - - v - y y bull- bull bullbullbull-bull bull ^^^-~-V--V bullbullbullbullbull - bull bullbull^^^^^^v^^y^-^vgt shy
APPENDIX 1
Letter from Balsam to EPA September 15 1989
I bull|UillPMJLf
I rbullyyyyyli^^-ybull w^mrnr^^shy
I I I I I I t I 1
4BALSAM ErwennQ btvinrantrtti Scire amp M u i M Hygim
MfiliiaiRMtf 8laquollaquomNH8Q79
September 15 1989 Balsam Project 618G830
Mr R(tfer Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-GAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agen^ Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massadhufietts 02203
RE Recommendations for tlio Second Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)
Dear Mr Duwart
Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) has reviewed validated analytical data generated from the Hrst round of ground water surface water and sediment sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during April 1989 The purpose of this letter U to briefly discuss the analytical results the significance of the results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the second round of sampling The tables and figures referred to in this letter were provided to you during the progress meeting on September 22 1989 Sampling locations are indicated on Figures 1 2 and 3 Data reviewed included analytical results for Hazardous Substance List (HSL) volatile organic compound analyses (VOCs) HSL semivolatile organic compound analyses HSL pcstiddePCB analyses and HSL inorganic parameter analyses Summaries of the parameters detected in each sample are provided in the previously submitted drafl Tables 1 2 and 8 General diemistary parameters including chloride sulfate nitrate as N nitrite as N alkalinity biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were also analyzed at many locations Ground water from selected wells was also analyzed for total organic carbon (TOO and total and fecal coliform Tables 4 and 5 provided a summaiy of the general diemistry results
As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the second sampling round reported concentrations were compared to available federal or state standards or guidelines and trends or anomalies in data were noted Tle results of this data review and our recommendations for parameters to indude in thc second romd sampling program are sununarized below
BALSAM ENVlftONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
Balsam Prefect 6186830 Septemiber 161989 Page 2
HSL VolatUe Organic Compound Analyses
V0Clt6 were detected in twenty of the thirty-six monitoring wells sampled VOCs were confirmed present only ia on-site monitoring wells and consisted primarUy of chlorinated and aromatic compounds IndudinglTlHdichlagroethane^mdash ~ r dichloroethane 111-trichloroothane trichloroethene tolueacL xylenes and ethylbenzene Methyl-t-butyl-ether (MTBE) was not reportoa present above detection limits in any samples VOCs were reported to be detected at two of the ten surface water sampling locations (S-3 and S-9) boUi located in the lower swaleBrook A area VOCs were reported to be detected at five of the eight sediment sampling locations (S-l S-2 S-S S-9 and S-10)
HSL Semivolatile Organic Compound Analyses
HSL semivolatile organic compounds were reported to be present at low concentrations in ground water samples from four wells located at the base of the former disposal area (M0-2DR 0W-2SR 0W-2DR and CKW-4SRX Low concentrations of bb (2-e(hylhczyl) phthalate were also reported present in samplesfirom six weUs located on site and off site (MW-15S MW-15D MW-12S MW-13S MW-13D and M0-4D) Naphthalene and acenaphthene were reported present in ground water samples fi^m wells MW-15S and M0-4S respectively at low concentrations Bis (2-ethylhci^l) phthalate was the only semivolatile compound reported to be present in two of the ten surface water samples (S-2 and S-5) Three of the eight sediment samples contained semivolatile organic compounds Benzoic add and di-n-butylphuialate were reported to be present in one sediment sample (S-9) and only di-n-butylphthalate was detected In two sediment samples (S-2 and S-4)
HSL PesticidePCB Analyses
PCBs were reported to be present below contract required detection limits (CRDLs) but above instrument detection limits Ooss than 05 ppb) in ground water samples collectedfitgtm Umx wells located at the base of the former drum disposal area and in the dearing north of the swale (0W-2SR 0W-2DR 0W-8R and MW-llD) PCBt were reported to be present in six of tiie ten surface water samples collected Oess than 1 ppb) from the swale Brook A and the Exeter River (S-l S-2 S-5 8-8 S-9 and S-10) One sediment sample (S-10) collected at the base of the piggeiY waste pile was reported to conlak the pesticide 44shyDDE at a concentration less than 15 ppb
HSL Inorganic Parameter Analysoa
Results of HSL inorganic paramcta analyses were compared to state or federal maximum contaminant limits primary or secondary drinking yenrater standards and EPA Ambient Water Quality (Mtcria as appropriate Based upon these comparisons reported concentrations of arsenic iron and manganese in ground water samples exceeded guidelines for at least one parameter bi samples from
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC
r Balsam Project 6186830 September 151989 Page 8
filVeen wells located both on site and off site The only elevated arsenic concentration reported in an off-site sample was from MW-19D Results for surface water samples indicated iron manganese or silver exceeded guidelines ior_at least one parameter atfive j f the ien sampling locatJona It diould be noted that inm and manganese standardsarc aesthetic andjgtot health based ~ guidelines
Results of sediment analyses were compared to a United States Cieological Survey (USOS) reference document (USGS Professional Paper 1270) vHiidt jM^vides average element concentrations in soils for the eastem United States Results rexjorled for the sediment data Indicated above average concentrations of arsenic barium cobalt lead manganese nidcel and xinc at one sediment sampling location locatisd at Ihe tose of the piggery waste jrfle (S-10) However elevated concentrations were not present in data collected at downstream sampling locatiltms Slightly elevated concentrations of some parameters wore also observed at five other sediment sampling locations
General Chomlstiy Parameters
Total and fecal coliform results for ground water were reported below the available guidelines exduding a result f^m one off-site well (MW-16D) Results for sulfate chloride nitrate and nitrite in ground water were all reported at concenlratioas below available state or federal guidelines Aivomalies were not observed in Uie results for TOC analyses Alkalinity results in ground water were reported below state guidelines however relatively higher concentrations of this parameter wore noted in samples com wells whidi also had relatively high reported values of VOCs (0W2SR 0W2DR 0W-4SR 0W-4DR M0-2S and M0-3SR) A similar trend was observed for the results from BOD and COD analyses
PROPOSED AXALYHCAL SUITE
VOCs appear to be the primary contaminants identified in samples collected during the April samplingprogram noting that MTBE was not Identified present in any sanples iWefore VCXS should be included la the second sampling round whidi wiU indude the same monitoring well and surface water sampling loeaUons ss the first sampling round
Tlie semi-volatile organic compounds identified in thc first round were reported a t relatively low concentrations and primarily fi^m samples collected in areas where notable concentrations of V(Xs were also identified Ihe other az^as where semivolatile organic compounds were estimated to be present eudi as samples from well lfW-13 and off-site locations were generallv at concentrations below contract dctectiim limits and are common environmental eontaminants not Ukely to be related to activities at the Mottolo site Therefore BsJsam proposes to collect and analvxe a limited number of samples fitgtm wells where the presence of semivolatile organic compounds firom site activities was indicated
bull ^ - bull [J I I i raquo l I X - bull W i
bull bull t j 3- n j ^ f l bdquo i i w g u Wraquo
i
I
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
r
^
Balsam PntJect 6165830
September 15 1089 Page 4
The results of the pestiddePCB analyses Indicate that trace concentrations of Aroclor 1260 were detected In several surface water and ground water samples a t concentration below 1 ppb Therefore samples will be collected f^ PCB
-analysis fiomJocations where P(2Bs vere previously detected^-as-wdl as J ^ _ limited number of locations where PCBs were not r epor t^ present ~ - ~
l l i e inorganic parameter analytical results indicate elevated concentrations of arsenic Iron and manganese at several monitoring well locations Based upon the review of these data Balsam proposes to include arsenic in the second round analytical suite since this parameter appears to correlate best wlUi areas of on-site contamination and belaquoiuse of relatively low toxidty of iron and manganese
Analytical results for the general chemistrv parameters were generally within accepted limits for naturally occurring media and significant trends or anomalies In these data were not noted Therefore resampling and analyses fbr the general chemisliy parameters would not likely provide significant additional information to thc Mottolo data base or improve site diaracterization efforts
A summary of the proposed second round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attadied Table 1 Several locations whore contaminants were not detected in Uie f^st sampling round will also be resampled for selected parameters to confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We arc scheduled to conduct sampling activities the wedi of Septembor 26 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this woric on schedule Please do not hesitate io contact Eric Wood or either of the undersigned if you have any questions
Sincerely
1 ltcQ Timothy a Stone CPG Bl Prqjeet Manager
Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager
c c J Pdtonen (Stark ft Peltonen) M Robinette (NHDES)
lt90^415
Attachment
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
All split samples were shipped under Case nutober 12791 fPC shipped the samples to the following laboratories
Volatile Organics
1 Aquatech Inc 75 Green Mountain Drive S Burlington VT 05403 (M7(802) 658-107658-10744 Attn Janlne Banks
I BNAs amp PestPCBs
lEA 1901 N Harrison Avenue Cary NC 27511 (919) 467-9919 Attn Gary Gilleland
Inorganics
Chemtech Consulting Gtcnxp 360 West llth Street New York NY 10014 (212) 255-2100 i Attn Kostas Lambiris
21 Location of Split Sanples
Table 1 presented below indicates the station number location date and time of collection eunalyses conducted on the sample sanple matrix and corresponding CLP traffic number assigned to each saiqple al(xig with a ccxmtent field Figures 1 and 2 identify the locations from where split samples were obtained On September 29 1989 Michael Kulbersh received a call from Cindfy Schreyer of EPAs Saaple Management Office (SMO) Ms Schreyer informed Mr Kulbersh that since analyses for extractables and PesticidesPCBs went to a different laboratory than the VGA sangtles that two distinctly different traffic numbers must be assigned to eadi sample Therefore at SMOs request FPC Federal Expressed to lEA Labs a revised Organic Traffic Report under the section special handling the original traffic nvmibers assigned to the 6anfgtles were referenced
(2)
TABLE 1 MOTTOLO SITE RAYMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING INFORMATION SEPTE31BER 27 AND 28 1989
STATION STATION DATETIME ANALYSES SAMPLE CLP TRAFFIC NUMBER LOCATION COLLECTION CONDUCTED NATRIX NUMBER OOMNENT FIELD
1 MWmdash6S 92789 1545 VQAs Metals AQ40lMAL540 2 Mlaquo-13D 92789 e 1240 VQAS GW AQ402 3 0W-4SR 92889 1520 VQAS BNAs Metals i GW AQ403A(2421nAL541 MSMSD 4 MW-18D 92889 e 1405 VQAS GW AQ404 5 N0-3SR 92889 e 1300 VQAS Metals GW AQ405HAL542 6 MO-35D 92889 e 1302 VQAS Metals -GW - AQ406HAL543 Duplicate saafgtle of MO-3 7 Wf-llO 92789 e 1210 VQAS PestPCBs reg AQ407AQ422 8 S-3 92889 1002 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ408AQ423 9 S-13 92889 sect 1004 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ409AQ424 Duplicate sample of S-3 10 S-6 92889 sect 0840 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ410AQ425 11 S-9 92889 euro 1610 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ411AQ426 12 raquof-TBl 92789 1245 VQAS NA AQ412 Trip Blank 13 SW-TB2 92789 e 1300 VQAS NA AQ413 Trip Blank 14 HW-101 92789 1530 Metals NA MAL544 Performance Eval Saofle 15 MW-102 92789 e 1545 Metals NA MAL545 Performance Eval Sample
Legend VQAs - Volatile Organic Analyses GW^ - Groundwater AQ401 - AQ prefix is Organic Traffic Report Ntmdber MAL540 - HAL prefix is Inorganic Traffic Number BNAs - BasetleutralAcid Extractable SW^ - Surface Water NA - Not i^licable
(3)
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
AQ-Organic traffic report number
MAL-Inorganic traffic report nuinber
lpoundSQSL
^ - OVERBUROEN WELL
- ^ - SHALLOW BEDROCK W J
bull - BARCAD SAMPLER
O - DUG WfELl
e JETTED BORING AND WELL POINT
= SURFACE WATER ELEVATION LOCATION
R - REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING WEIL
~ ~ - ELEVATION IN FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL
KJ QUINN CO
^ STE AREA MONITORING WELL
ft STREAM ELEVATION LOCATIONS
bullMZcE
MOnOLO RIFS
yaiiin
KJ QUINN CO
OFF-SITE MONITORING WELL
LOCATIONS
MOTTOLO RIFS
WBms-FIG 2 18581
AQ-Organic traffic report number
22 Preservatiwi of Sanples
Sanples analyzed for volatile organics were shipped pre-preserved with 11 l ^ roch lo r i c acid (HCL) VOA sanples were collected in two 40 ml glass v ia l s
Samples analyzed for metals were shipped in a one l i t e r polyethylene bottle containing n i t r ic add (HNQ ) All metal sanples with the exception of MAL544 (M9-101) and MAL545 (MW-102) were field f i l t e r e d by Balsam with a Nalge punp equipped with a 045 micron f i l t e r Samples MAL544 and MAL545 vere performance evaltiation samples submitted to FPC by Lisa Gatton Vidulich Region 2 deputy program officer FPC does not know v ^ t h e r these samples contained n i t r i c acid as a preservative The content of these samples was unknown to FPC
Sanples analyzed for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs were shipped unpreserved in 80 oz sabet glass jugs
23 Quality Assurance Sanples
FPC submitted two t r i p blades for analyses of vo la t i l e organics These sanples were fil led vi th d i s t i l l e d water on September 26 1989 and b rou^ t to the s i te viere they were logged in an the t r a f f i c report and chain-of-custody forms as SW-TBl and SW-TB2 The t r a f f i c report numbers assigned to these sanples are AQ412 and AQ413 respectively
A duplicate groundwater saiple and a surface water sanple were collected a t M0-3SR and S-3 respectively The duplicate groundwater sample was labeled as HQ-35D and the duplicate surface water sanple was labeled as S-13 on the t r a f f i c reports and chain-of-custody forms
At 0W-4SR FPC collected additioned sanple volume for the laboratories to conduct a matrix spike and a matrix spike dupl icate (MSMSD) analysis Triple the volune was collected for v o l a t i l e organics and BNAs and twice the volume for metals as required by EPAs sanple management office (SNQ)
FPC received a ca l l from Jim Sullivan of ESAT an September 29 1989 Hr Sullivan informed Hike Kulbersh tha t lEA laboratory contacted SMO the morning of Septenber 29 1989 to inform them that there wasn t sufficient volume for lEA to perform the MSMSD on the PesticidePCBs fraction At approxinately 1100 am Mr Sullivan contacted Mike KTilbersh for a second time to inform him that the issue was being resolved and that one of tbe sanples requiring analysis for PesticidesPCBs would be used to perform the MSMSD analys is In order to do t h i s less volume would be used for the analysis of the sanple
(6)
bull gt gt bull - ^ ^ J - S - ^ bull bull bull bull bull ~ bull bull - ^ J f ^ 1 bull i
30 Bethods for Collecting Sanples
Prior to collecting groundvater sanples a two person Balsam team vent around the study area and measured the depth to water total veil depth and recorded the diameter of the monitoring wells Given this informatioi the sanpling crews were able to determine the necessary volune required to adequately purge the wells At a minimum three times the well volume was purged
Depending cn the diameter of the well Balsam used a 15 or a 30 inch diameter FVC bailer attached to a nylon cord All off-site bedrock wells were purged using a punp At monitoring well N9-18D FPC deserved that the water level in the well was pumped down nearly 50 feet prior to sanpling After the well was adequately purged two bailer volumes were wasted to the ground prior to sanpling At the locations v^re FPC collected split sanples with Balsam it was protocol that VQA bottles vere filled first followed by BNAs and PesticidePCBs and then inorganics Balsams sanpling teams collected extra volume in order to determine pH temperature and conductivity of the sanple Temperature and conductivity were determined inmediately after collecting the sanples sanples analyzed for p a were brou^ back to the staging area FPC observed that at every monitoring well location Balsams field crew ran a headspace test cm the purged water Ifcthe purged water elicited a HNu reading exceeding 10 parts per million (ppm) the water was drummed if not the water was dunped to the ground At well CW-4SR the headspace reading of the water sample was 17 ppm
Surface water sanples were obtained by submerging the bottles below the water surface All saqgtles were filled with the bottles facing upstream Care was taken in all cases that saiqples analyzed for VQAs didnt entrap any air bubbles Table 2 contains pH temperature and conductivity measurements for those sanples in which FPC collected splits
At sanple location S-6 FPC collected a sanple for analysis of VQAs and PesticidePCBs However (one of Balsams VQA vials broke after tightening the lid Balsam returned to this location and collected two additional VQA vials within ten minutes FPC didnt discard their sample and resanple
At each sanple location FPC recorded on a data description form pertinent field observations this information is provided in Apendix 3
(7)
I TABLE 2
Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire
pB Tenperature and Conductivity Measurements for Split Sanples
Round II Groundwater and Surface Water Sanpling September 27 and 28 1989
saricN NUHBER
STATION LOCATION BH
TTMP
_degc_ CONDUCT UMHOSCM
1 nw-8S 59 8 90 2 MM-13D 58 10 120 3 0W-4SR 6 1 14 360 4 n ^ l 8 D 66 12 208 56 MO-3SRMO-35D 6 3 8 5 220 7 MW-llD 58 15 45 89 S-3S-13 54 7 15
10 S-6 53 6 20 11 S-9 5 5 10 50
pH tenperature and conductivity was not recorded for trip blaiAs and performance evaluations sanples
(8)
bullm W raquo T ^rr
40 Sanple Paperwork and Shipping of Coolers
After collecting a sanple FPC logged the sample in on the diain-of-custody forms and traffic reports Information pertaining to sanpling time and date location preservative traffic number and analyte was recorded on each sample container and tag The bottles were sealed with strapping tape and custody seals Sanples were then placed in coolers and cushioned against breaking using absorbent material Sanples were kept cool using reusable ice packs
Two copies of the traffic reports and a copy of the chain-of-custody forms were sealed in t h e xpper lid of the cooler Two signed custody seals were placed an the coolers which were taped shut with strapping tape Ccpies of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms are provided in Afpendix 4
Sanples were shipped via Federal Express Ttie airbill number for each laboratory is as follows
Aquatec Inc - 4173910241 lEA - 4173910215 Chemtech Consulting Group - 4173910226
50 Ccmclusions
FPC collected all samples as anticipated FPC telefrfioned SMO on September 29 1989 to inform them that all sanples were shipped and that Case 12791 could be closed out
FPC feels that Balsam followed their sanpling and analysis plan vrtien collecting environmental sanples FPC believes that wells were adequately purged prior to sanpling and that purged water was adequately screened with an HNu prior to disposal Water levels and depth of the well were accurately measured to dthin 001 Care was taken by Balsam in not stirring up sediment prior to sanpling surface water
At 350 pm on September 29 1989 Nike Kulbersh received a call from Cindy Schreyer of SNQ Ms Schreyer informed Mr Kulbersh that the traffic n a a t e t B for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs would have to be renumbered and that a revised organic traffic report would have to be resubmitted to lEA and SMO The reason for revising the traffic report is that there nust be two distinctly different traffic report numbers for each laboratory FPC conplied with SNQ and sent a revised organic traffic report to lEA
Finally FPC was informed by Balsam that they were using Aquatech laboratories to analyze their sanples FPC requests that prior to the third round of groundwater ar^ surface water sanpling Balsam inform EPA as to gt^t laboratory (ies) they are planning to use so that FPC doesnt send their sanples to the same labs
(9)
h ^ ^ ^ I bull - - v - y y bull- bull bullbullbull-bull bull ^^^-~-V--V bullbullbullbullbull - bull bullbull^^^^^^v^^y^-^vgt shy
APPENDIX 1
Letter from Balsam to EPA September 15 1989
I bull|UillPMJLf
I rbullyyyyyli^^-ybull w^mrnr^^shy
I I I I I I t I 1
4BALSAM ErwennQ btvinrantrtti Scire amp M u i M Hygim
MfiliiaiRMtf 8laquollaquomNH8Q79
September 15 1989 Balsam Project 618G830
Mr R(tfer Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-GAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agen^ Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massadhufietts 02203
RE Recommendations for tlio Second Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)
Dear Mr Duwart
Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) has reviewed validated analytical data generated from the Hrst round of ground water surface water and sediment sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during April 1989 The purpose of this letter U to briefly discuss the analytical results the significance of the results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the second round of sampling The tables and figures referred to in this letter were provided to you during the progress meeting on September 22 1989 Sampling locations are indicated on Figures 1 2 and 3 Data reviewed included analytical results for Hazardous Substance List (HSL) volatile organic compound analyses (VOCs) HSL semivolatile organic compound analyses HSL pcstiddePCB analyses and HSL inorganic parameter analyses Summaries of the parameters detected in each sample are provided in the previously submitted drafl Tables 1 2 and 8 General diemistary parameters including chloride sulfate nitrate as N nitrite as N alkalinity biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were also analyzed at many locations Ground water from selected wells was also analyzed for total organic carbon (TOO and total and fecal coliform Tables 4 and 5 provided a summaiy of the general diemistry results
As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the second sampling round reported concentrations were compared to available federal or state standards or guidelines and trends or anomalies in data were noted Tle results of this data review and our recommendations for parameters to indude in thc second romd sampling program are sununarized below
BALSAM ENVlftONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
Balsam Prefect 6186830 Septemiber 161989 Page 2
HSL VolatUe Organic Compound Analyses
V0Clt6 were detected in twenty of the thirty-six monitoring wells sampled VOCs were confirmed present only ia on-site monitoring wells and consisted primarUy of chlorinated and aromatic compounds IndudinglTlHdichlagroethane^mdash ~ r dichloroethane 111-trichloroothane trichloroethene tolueacL xylenes and ethylbenzene Methyl-t-butyl-ether (MTBE) was not reportoa present above detection limits in any samples VOCs were reported to be detected at two of the ten surface water sampling locations (S-3 and S-9) boUi located in the lower swaleBrook A area VOCs were reported to be detected at five of the eight sediment sampling locations (S-l S-2 S-S S-9 and S-10)
HSL Semivolatile Organic Compound Analyses
HSL semivolatile organic compounds were reported to be present at low concentrations in ground water samples from four wells located at the base of the former disposal area (M0-2DR 0W-2SR 0W-2DR and CKW-4SRX Low concentrations of bb (2-e(hylhczyl) phthalate were also reported present in samplesfirom six weUs located on site and off site (MW-15S MW-15D MW-12S MW-13S MW-13D and M0-4D) Naphthalene and acenaphthene were reported present in ground water samples fi^m wells MW-15S and M0-4S respectively at low concentrations Bis (2-ethylhci^l) phthalate was the only semivolatile compound reported to be present in two of the ten surface water samples (S-2 and S-5) Three of the eight sediment samples contained semivolatile organic compounds Benzoic add and di-n-butylphuialate were reported to be present in one sediment sample (S-9) and only di-n-butylphthalate was detected In two sediment samples (S-2 and S-4)
HSL PesticidePCB Analyses
PCBs were reported to be present below contract required detection limits (CRDLs) but above instrument detection limits Ooss than 05 ppb) in ground water samples collectedfitgtm Umx wells located at the base of the former drum disposal area and in the dearing north of the swale (0W-2SR 0W-2DR 0W-8R and MW-llD) PCBt were reported to be present in six of tiie ten surface water samples collected Oess than 1 ppb) from the swale Brook A and the Exeter River (S-l S-2 S-5 8-8 S-9 and S-10) One sediment sample (S-10) collected at the base of the piggeiY waste pile was reported to conlak the pesticide 44shyDDE at a concentration less than 15 ppb
HSL Inorganic Parameter Analysoa
Results of HSL inorganic paramcta analyses were compared to state or federal maximum contaminant limits primary or secondary drinking yenrater standards and EPA Ambient Water Quality (Mtcria as appropriate Based upon these comparisons reported concentrations of arsenic iron and manganese in ground water samples exceeded guidelines for at least one parameter bi samples from
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC
r Balsam Project 6186830 September 151989 Page 8
filVeen wells located both on site and off site The only elevated arsenic concentration reported in an off-site sample was from MW-19D Results for surface water samples indicated iron manganese or silver exceeded guidelines ior_at least one parameter atfive j f the ien sampling locatJona It diould be noted that inm and manganese standardsarc aesthetic andjgtot health based ~ guidelines
Results of sediment analyses were compared to a United States Cieological Survey (USOS) reference document (USGS Professional Paper 1270) vHiidt jM^vides average element concentrations in soils for the eastem United States Results rexjorled for the sediment data Indicated above average concentrations of arsenic barium cobalt lead manganese nidcel and xinc at one sediment sampling location locatisd at Ihe tose of the piggery waste jrfle (S-10) However elevated concentrations were not present in data collected at downstream sampling locatiltms Slightly elevated concentrations of some parameters wore also observed at five other sediment sampling locations
General Chomlstiy Parameters
Total and fecal coliform results for ground water were reported below the available guidelines exduding a result f^m one off-site well (MW-16D) Results for sulfate chloride nitrate and nitrite in ground water were all reported at concenlratioas below available state or federal guidelines Aivomalies were not observed in Uie results for TOC analyses Alkalinity results in ground water were reported below state guidelines however relatively higher concentrations of this parameter wore noted in samples com wells whidi also had relatively high reported values of VOCs (0W2SR 0W2DR 0W-4SR 0W-4DR M0-2S and M0-3SR) A similar trend was observed for the results from BOD and COD analyses
PROPOSED AXALYHCAL SUITE
VOCs appear to be the primary contaminants identified in samples collected during the April samplingprogram noting that MTBE was not Identified present in any sanples iWefore VCXS should be included la the second sampling round whidi wiU indude the same monitoring well and surface water sampling loeaUons ss the first sampling round
Tlie semi-volatile organic compounds identified in thc first round were reported a t relatively low concentrations and primarily fi^m samples collected in areas where notable concentrations of V(Xs were also identified Ihe other az^as where semivolatile organic compounds were estimated to be present eudi as samples from well lfW-13 and off-site locations were generallv at concentrations below contract dctectiim limits and are common environmental eontaminants not Ukely to be related to activities at the Mottolo site Therefore BsJsam proposes to collect and analvxe a limited number of samples fitgtm wells where the presence of semivolatile organic compounds firom site activities was indicated
bull ^ - bull [J I I i raquo l I X - bull W i
bull bull t j 3- n j ^ f l bdquo i i w g u Wraquo
i
I
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
r
^
Balsam PntJect 6165830
September 15 1089 Page 4
The results of the pestiddePCB analyses Indicate that trace concentrations of Aroclor 1260 were detected In several surface water and ground water samples a t concentration below 1 ppb Therefore samples will be collected f^ PCB
-analysis fiomJocations where P(2Bs vere previously detected^-as-wdl as J ^ _ limited number of locations where PCBs were not r epor t^ present ~ - ~
l l i e inorganic parameter analytical results indicate elevated concentrations of arsenic Iron and manganese at several monitoring well locations Based upon the review of these data Balsam proposes to include arsenic in the second round analytical suite since this parameter appears to correlate best wlUi areas of on-site contamination and belaquoiuse of relatively low toxidty of iron and manganese
Analytical results for the general chemistrv parameters were generally within accepted limits for naturally occurring media and significant trends or anomalies In these data were not noted Therefore resampling and analyses fbr the general chemisliy parameters would not likely provide significant additional information to thc Mottolo data base or improve site diaracterization efforts
A summary of the proposed second round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attadied Table 1 Several locations whore contaminants were not detected in Uie f^st sampling round will also be resampled for selected parameters to confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We arc scheduled to conduct sampling activities the wedi of Septembor 26 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this woric on schedule Please do not hesitate io contact Eric Wood or either of the undersigned if you have any questions
Sincerely
1 ltcQ Timothy a Stone CPG Bl Prqjeet Manager
Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager
c c J Pdtonen (Stark ft Peltonen) M Robinette (NHDES)
lt90^415
Attachment
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
TABLE 1 MOTTOLO SITE RAYMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING INFORMATION SEPTE31BER 27 AND 28 1989
STATION STATION DATETIME ANALYSES SAMPLE CLP TRAFFIC NUMBER LOCATION COLLECTION CONDUCTED NATRIX NUMBER OOMNENT FIELD
1 MWmdash6S 92789 1545 VQAs Metals AQ40lMAL540 2 Mlaquo-13D 92789 e 1240 VQAS GW AQ402 3 0W-4SR 92889 1520 VQAS BNAs Metals i GW AQ403A(2421nAL541 MSMSD 4 MW-18D 92889 e 1405 VQAS GW AQ404 5 N0-3SR 92889 e 1300 VQAS Metals GW AQ405HAL542 6 MO-35D 92889 e 1302 VQAS Metals -GW - AQ406HAL543 Duplicate saafgtle of MO-3 7 Wf-llO 92789 e 1210 VQAS PestPCBs reg AQ407AQ422 8 S-3 92889 1002 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ408AQ423 9 S-13 92889 sect 1004 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ409AQ424 Duplicate sample of S-3 10 S-6 92889 sect 0840 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ410AQ425 11 S-9 92889 euro 1610 VQAS PestPCBs SW AQ411AQ426 12 raquof-TBl 92789 1245 VQAS NA AQ412 Trip Blank 13 SW-TB2 92789 e 1300 VQAS NA AQ413 Trip Blank 14 HW-101 92789 1530 Metals NA MAL544 Performance Eval Saofle 15 MW-102 92789 e 1545 Metals NA MAL545 Performance Eval Sample
Legend VQAs - Volatile Organic Analyses GW^ - Groundwater AQ401 - AQ prefix is Organic Traffic Report Ntmdber MAL540 - HAL prefix is Inorganic Traffic Number BNAs - BasetleutralAcid Extractable SW^ - Surface Water NA - Not i^licable
(3)
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
AQ-Organic traffic report number
MAL-Inorganic traffic report nuinber
lpoundSQSL
^ - OVERBUROEN WELL
- ^ - SHALLOW BEDROCK W J
bull - BARCAD SAMPLER
O - DUG WfELl
e JETTED BORING AND WELL POINT
= SURFACE WATER ELEVATION LOCATION
R - REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING WEIL
~ ~ - ELEVATION IN FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL
KJ QUINN CO
^ STE AREA MONITORING WELL
ft STREAM ELEVATION LOCATIONS
bullMZcE
MOnOLO RIFS
yaiiin
KJ QUINN CO
OFF-SITE MONITORING WELL
LOCATIONS
MOTTOLO RIFS
WBms-FIG 2 18581
AQ-Organic traffic report number
22 Preservatiwi of Sanples
Sanples analyzed for volatile organics were shipped pre-preserved with 11 l ^ roch lo r i c acid (HCL) VOA sanples were collected in two 40 ml glass v ia l s
Samples analyzed for metals were shipped in a one l i t e r polyethylene bottle containing n i t r ic add (HNQ ) All metal sanples with the exception of MAL544 (M9-101) and MAL545 (MW-102) were field f i l t e r e d by Balsam with a Nalge punp equipped with a 045 micron f i l t e r Samples MAL544 and MAL545 vere performance evaltiation samples submitted to FPC by Lisa Gatton Vidulich Region 2 deputy program officer FPC does not know v ^ t h e r these samples contained n i t r i c acid as a preservative The content of these samples was unknown to FPC
Sanples analyzed for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs were shipped unpreserved in 80 oz sabet glass jugs
23 Quality Assurance Sanples
FPC submitted two t r i p blades for analyses of vo la t i l e organics These sanples were fil led vi th d i s t i l l e d water on September 26 1989 and b rou^ t to the s i te viere they were logged in an the t r a f f i c report and chain-of-custody forms as SW-TBl and SW-TB2 The t r a f f i c report numbers assigned to these sanples are AQ412 and AQ413 respectively
A duplicate groundwater saiple and a surface water sanple were collected a t M0-3SR and S-3 respectively The duplicate groundwater sample was labeled as HQ-35D and the duplicate surface water sanple was labeled as S-13 on the t r a f f i c reports and chain-of-custody forms
At 0W-4SR FPC collected additioned sanple volume for the laboratories to conduct a matrix spike and a matrix spike dupl icate (MSMSD) analysis Triple the volune was collected for v o l a t i l e organics and BNAs and twice the volume for metals as required by EPAs sanple management office (SNQ)
FPC received a ca l l from Jim Sullivan of ESAT an September 29 1989 Hr Sullivan informed Hike Kulbersh tha t lEA laboratory contacted SMO the morning of Septenber 29 1989 to inform them that there wasn t sufficient volume for lEA to perform the MSMSD on the PesticidePCBs fraction At approxinately 1100 am Mr Sullivan contacted Mike KTilbersh for a second time to inform him that the issue was being resolved and that one of tbe sanples requiring analysis for PesticidesPCBs would be used to perform the MSMSD analys is In order to do t h i s less volume would be used for the analysis of the sanple
(6)
bull gt gt bull - ^ ^ J - S - ^ bull bull bull bull bull ~ bull bull - ^ J f ^ 1 bull i
30 Bethods for Collecting Sanples
Prior to collecting groundvater sanples a two person Balsam team vent around the study area and measured the depth to water total veil depth and recorded the diameter of the monitoring wells Given this informatioi the sanpling crews were able to determine the necessary volune required to adequately purge the wells At a minimum three times the well volume was purged
Depending cn the diameter of the well Balsam used a 15 or a 30 inch diameter FVC bailer attached to a nylon cord All off-site bedrock wells were purged using a punp At monitoring well N9-18D FPC deserved that the water level in the well was pumped down nearly 50 feet prior to sanpling After the well was adequately purged two bailer volumes were wasted to the ground prior to sanpling At the locations v^re FPC collected split sanples with Balsam it was protocol that VQA bottles vere filled first followed by BNAs and PesticidePCBs and then inorganics Balsams sanpling teams collected extra volume in order to determine pH temperature and conductivity of the sanple Temperature and conductivity were determined inmediately after collecting the sanples sanples analyzed for p a were brou^ back to the staging area FPC observed that at every monitoring well location Balsams field crew ran a headspace test cm the purged water Ifcthe purged water elicited a HNu reading exceeding 10 parts per million (ppm) the water was drummed if not the water was dunped to the ground At well CW-4SR the headspace reading of the water sample was 17 ppm
Surface water sanples were obtained by submerging the bottles below the water surface All saqgtles were filled with the bottles facing upstream Care was taken in all cases that saiqples analyzed for VQAs didnt entrap any air bubbles Table 2 contains pH temperature and conductivity measurements for those sanples in which FPC collected splits
At sanple location S-6 FPC collected a sanple for analysis of VQAs and PesticidePCBs However (one of Balsams VQA vials broke after tightening the lid Balsam returned to this location and collected two additional VQA vials within ten minutes FPC didnt discard their sample and resanple
At each sanple location FPC recorded on a data description form pertinent field observations this information is provided in Apendix 3
(7)
I TABLE 2
Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire
pB Tenperature and Conductivity Measurements for Split Sanples
Round II Groundwater and Surface Water Sanpling September 27 and 28 1989
saricN NUHBER
STATION LOCATION BH
TTMP
_degc_ CONDUCT UMHOSCM
1 nw-8S 59 8 90 2 MM-13D 58 10 120 3 0W-4SR 6 1 14 360 4 n ^ l 8 D 66 12 208 56 MO-3SRMO-35D 6 3 8 5 220 7 MW-llD 58 15 45 89 S-3S-13 54 7 15
10 S-6 53 6 20 11 S-9 5 5 10 50
pH tenperature and conductivity was not recorded for trip blaiAs and performance evaluations sanples
(8)
bullm W raquo T ^rr
40 Sanple Paperwork and Shipping of Coolers
After collecting a sanple FPC logged the sample in on the diain-of-custody forms and traffic reports Information pertaining to sanpling time and date location preservative traffic number and analyte was recorded on each sample container and tag The bottles were sealed with strapping tape and custody seals Sanples were then placed in coolers and cushioned against breaking using absorbent material Sanples were kept cool using reusable ice packs
Two copies of the traffic reports and a copy of the chain-of-custody forms were sealed in t h e xpper lid of the cooler Two signed custody seals were placed an the coolers which were taped shut with strapping tape Ccpies of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms are provided in Afpendix 4
Sanples were shipped via Federal Express Ttie airbill number for each laboratory is as follows
Aquatec Inc - 4173910241 lEA - 4173910215 Chemtech Consulting Group - 4173910226
50 Ccmclusions
FPC collected all samples as anticipated FPC telefrfioned SMO on September 29 1989 to inform them that all sanples were shipped and that Case 12791 could be closed out
FPC feels that Balsam followed their sanpling and analysis plan vrtien collecting environmental sanples FPC believes that wells were adequately purged prior to sanpling and that purged water was adequately screened with an HNu prior to disposal Water levels and depth of the well were accurately measured to dthin 001 Care was taken by Balsam in not stirring up sediment prior to sanpling surface water
At 350 pm on September 29 1989 Nike Kulbersh received a call from Cindy Schreyer of SNQ Ms Schreyer informed Mr Kulbersh that the traffic n a a t e t B for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs would have to be renumbered and that a revised organic traffic report would have to be resubmitted to lEA and SMO The reason for revising the traffic report is that there nust be two distinctly different traffic report numbers for each laboratory FPC conplied with SNQ and sent a revised organic traffic report to lEA
Finally FPC was informed by Balsam that they were using Aquatech laboratories to analyze their sanples FPC requests that prior to the third round of groundwater ar^ surface water sanpling Balsam inform EPA as to gt^t laboratory (ies) they are planning to use so that FPC doesnt send their sanples to the same labs
(9)
h ^ ^ ^ I bull - - v - y y bull- bull bullbullbull-bull bull ^^^-~-V--V bullbullbullbullbull - bull bullbull^^^^^^v^^y^-^vgt shy
APPENDIX 1
Letter from Balsam to EPA September 15 1989
I bull|UillPMJLf
I rbullyyyyyli^^-ybull w^mrnr^^shy
I I I I I I t I 1
4BALSAM ErwennQ btvinrantrtti Scire amp M u i M Hygim
MfiliiaiRMtf 8laquollaquomNH8Q79
September 15 1989 Balsam Project 618G830
Mr R(tfer Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-GAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agen^ Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massadhufietts 02203
RE Recommendations for tlio Second Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)
Dear Mr Duwart
Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) has reviewed validated analytical data generated from the Hrst round of ground water surface water and sediment sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during April 1989 The purpose of this letter U to briefly discuss the analytical results the significance of the results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the second round of sampling The tables and figures referred to in this letter were provided to you during the progress meeting on September 22 1989 Sampling locations are indicated on Figures 1 2 and 3 Data reviewed included analytical results for Hazardous Substance List (HSL) volatile organic compound analyses (VOCs) HSL semivolatile organic compound analyses HSL pcstiddePCB analyses and HSL inorganic parameter analyses Summaries of the parameters detected in each sample are provided in the previously submitted drafl Tables 1 2 and 8 General diemistary parameters including chloride sulfate nitrate as N nitrite as N alkalinity biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were also analyzed at many locations Ground water from selected wells was also analyzed for total organic carbon (TOO and total and fecal coliform Tables 4 and 5 provided a summaiy of the general diemistry results
As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the second sampling round reported concentrations were compared to available federal or state standards or guidelines and trends or anomalies in data were noted Tle results of this data review and our recommendations for parameters to indude in thc second romd sampling program are sununarized below
BALSAM ENVlftONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
Balsam Prefect 6186830 Septemiber 161989 Page 2
HSL VolatUe Organic Compound Analyses
V0Clt6 were detected in twenty of the thirty-six monitoring wells sampled VOCs were confirmed present only ia on-site monitoring wells and consisted primarUy of chlorinated and aromatic compounds IndudinglTlHdichlagroethane^mdash ~ r dichloroethane 111-trichloroothane trichloroethene tolueacL xylenes and ethylbenzene Methyl-t-butyl-ether (MTBE) was not reportoa present above detection limits in any samples VOCs were reported to be detected at two of the ten surface water sampling locations (S-3 and S-9) boUi located in the lower swaleBrook A area VOCs were reported to be detected at five of the eight sediment sampling locations (S-l S-2 S-S S-9 and S-10)
HSL Semivolatile Organic Compound Analyses
HSL semivolatile organic compounds were reported to be present at low concentrations in ground water samples from four wells located at the base of the former disposal area (M0-2DR 0W-2SR 0W-2DR and CKW-4SRX Low concentrations of bb (2-e(hylhczyl) phthalate were also reported present in samplesfirom six weUs located on site and off site (MW-15S MW-15D MW-12S MW-13S MW-13D and M0-4D) Naphthalene and acenaphthene were reported present in ground water samples fi^m wells MW-15S and M0-4S respectively at low concentrations Bis (2-ethylhci^l) phthalate was the only semivolatile compound reported to be present in two of the ten surface water samples (S-2 and S-5) Three of the eight sediment samples contained semivolatile organic compounds Benzoic add and di-n-butylphuialate were reported to be present in one sediment sample (S-9) and only di-n-butylphthalate was detected In two sediment samples (S-2 and S-4)
HSL PesticidePCB Analyses
PCBs were reported to be present below contract required detection limits (CRDLs) but above instrument detection limits Ooss than 05 ppb) in ground water samples collectedfitgtm Umx wells located at the base of the former drum disposal area and in the dearing north of the swale (0W-2SR 0W-2DR 0W-8R and MW-llD) PCBt were reported to be present in six of tiie ten surface water samples collected Oess than 1 ppb) from the swale Brook A and the Exeter River (S-l S-2 S-5 8-8 S-9 and S-10) One sediment sample (S-10) collected at the base of the piggeiY waste pile was reported to conlak the pesticide 44shyDDE at a concentration less than 15 ppb
HSL Inorganic Parameter Analysoa
Results of HSL inorganic paramcta analyses were compared to state or federal maximum contaminant limits primary or secondary drinking yenrater standards and EPA Ambient Water Quality (Mtcria as appropriate Based upon these comparisons reported concentrations of arsenic iron and manganese in ground water samples exceeded guidelines for at least one parameter bi samples from
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC
r Balsam Project 6186830 September 151989 Page 8
filVeen wells located both on site and off site The only elevated arsenic concentration reported in an off-site sample was from MW-19D Results for surface water samples indicated iron manganese or silver exceeded guidelines ior_at least one parameter atfive j f the ien sampling locatJona It diould be noted that inm and manganese standardsarc aesthetic andjgtot health based ~ guidelines
Results of sediment analyses were compared to a United States Cieological Survey (USOS) reference document (USGS Professional Paper 1270) vHiidt jM^vides average element concentrations in soils for the eastem United States Results rexjorled for the sediment data Indicated above average concentrations of arsenic barium cobalt lead manganese nidcel and xinc at one sediment sampling location locatisd at Ihe tose of the piggery waste jrfle (S-10) However elevated concentrations were not present in data collected at downstream sampling locatiltms Slightly elevated concentrations of some parameters wore also observed at five other sediment sampling locations
General Chomlstiy Parameters
Total and fecal coliform results for ground water were reported below the available guidelines exduding a result f^m one off-site well (MW-16D) Results for sulfate chloride nitrate and nitrite in ground water were all reported at concenlratioas below available state or federal guidelines Aivomalies were not observed in Uie results for TOC analyses Alkalinity results in ground water were reported below state guidelines however relatively higher concentrations of this parameter wore noted in samples com wells whidi also had relatively high reported values of VOCs (0W2SR 0W2DR 0W-4SR 0W-4DR M0-2S and M0-3SR) A similar trend was observed for the results from BOD and COD analyses
PROPOSED AXALYHCAL SUITE
VOCs appear to be the primary contaminants identified in samples collected during the April samplingprogram noting that MTBE was not Identified present in any sanples iWefore VCXS should be included la the second sampling round whidi wiU indude the same monitoring well and surface water sampling loeaUons ss the first sampling round
Tlie semi-volatile organic compounds identified in thc first round were reported a t relatively low concentrations and primarily fi^m samples collected in areas where notable concentrations of V(Xs were also identified Ihe other az^as where semivolatile organic compounds were estimated to be present eudi as samples from well lfW-13 and off-site locations were generallv at concentrations below contract dctectiim limits and are common environmental eontaminants not Ukely to be related to activities at the Mottolo site Therefore BsJsam proposes to collect and analvxe a limited number of samples fitgtm wells where the presence of semivolatile organic compounds firom site activities was indicated
bull ^ - bull [J I I i raquo l I X - bull W i
bull bull t j 3- n j ^ f l bdquo i i w g u Wraquo
i
I
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
r
^
Balsam PntJect 6165830
September 15 1089 Page 4
The results of the pestiddePCB analyses Indicate that trace concentrations of Aroclor 1260 were detected In several surface water and ground water samples a t concentration below 1 ppb Therefore samples will be collected f^ PCB
-analysis fiomJocations where P(2Bs vere previously detected^-as-wdl as J ^ _ limited number of locations where PCBs were not r epor t^ present ~ - ~
l l i e inorganic parameter analytical results indicate elevated concentrations of arsenic Iron and manganese at several monitoring well locations Based upon the review of these data Balsam proposes to include arsenic in the second round analytical suite since this parameter appears to correlate best wlUi areas of on-site contamination and belaquoiuse of relatively low toxidty of iron and manganese
Analytical results for the general chemistrv parameters were generally within accepted limits for naturally occurring media and significant trends or anomalies In these data were not noted Therefore resampling and analyses fbr the general chemisliy parameters would not likely provide significant additional information to thc Mottolo data base or improve site diaracterization efforts
A summary of the proposed second round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attadied Table 1 Several locations whore contaminants were not detected in Uie f^st sampling round will also be resampled for selected parameters to confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We arc scheduled to conduct sampling activities the wedi of Septembor 26 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this woric on schedule Please do not hesitate io contact Eric Wood or either of the undersigned if you have any questions
Sincerely
1 ltcQ Timothy a Stone CPG Bl Prqjeet Manager
Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager
c c J Pdtonen (Stark ft Peltonen) M Robinette (NHDES)
lt90^415
Attachment
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
AQ-Organic traffic report number
MAL-Inorganic traffic report nuinber
lpoundSQSL
^ - OVERBUROEN WELL
- ^ - SHALLOW BEDROCK W J
bull - BARCAD SAMPLER
O - DUG WfELl
e JETTED BORING AND WELL POINT
= SURFACE WATER ELEVATION LOCATION
R - REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING WEIL
~ ~ - ELEVATION IN FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL
KJ QUINN CO
^ STE AREA MONITORING WELL
ft STREAM ELEVATION LOCATIONS
bullMZcE
MOnOLO RIFS
yaiiin
KJ QUINN CO
OFF-SITE MONITORING WELL
LOCATIONS
MOTTOLO RIFS
WBms-FIG 2 18581
AQ-Organic traffic report number
22 Preservatiwi of Sanples
Sanples analyzed for volatile organics were shipped pre-preserved with 11 l ^ roch lo r i c acid (HCL) VOA sanples were collected in two 40 ml glass v ia l s
Samples analyzed for metals were shipped in a one l i t e r polyethylene bottle containing n i t r ic add (HNQ ) All metal sanples with the exception of MAL544 (M9-101) and MAL545 (MW-102) were field f i l t e r e d by Balsam with a Nalge punp equipped with a 045 micron f i l t e r Samples MAL544 and MAL545 vere performance evaltiation samples submitted to FPC by Lisa Gatton Vidulich Region 2 deputy program officer FPC does not know v ^ t h e r these samples contained n i t r i c acid as a preservative The content of these samples was unknown to FPC
Sanples analyzed for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs were shipped unpreserved in 80 oz sabet glass jugs
23 Quality Assurance Sanples
FPC submitted two t r i p blades for analyses of vo la t i l e organics These sanples were fil led vi th d i s t i l l e d water on September 26 1989 and b rou^ t to the s i te viere they were logged in an the t r a f f i c report and chain-of-custody forms as SW-TBl and SW-TB2 The t r a f f i c report numbers assigned to these sanples are AQ412 and AQ413 respectively
A duplicate groundwater saiple and a surface water sanple were collected a t M0-3SR and S-3 respectively The duplicate groundwater sample was labeled as HQ-35D and the duplicate surface water sanple was labeled as S-13 on the t r a f f i c reports and chain-of-custody forms
At 0W-4SR FPC collected additioned sanple volume for the laboratories to conduct a matrix spike and a matrix spike dupl icate (MSMSD) analysis Triple the volune was collected for v o l a t i l e organics and BNAs and twice the volume for metals as required by EPAs sanple management office (SNQ)
FPC received a ca l l from Jim Sullivan of ESAT an September 29 1989 Hr Sullivan informed Hike Kulbersh tha t lEA laboratory contacted SMO the morning of Septenber 29 1989 to inform them that there wasn t sufficient volume for lEA to perform the MSMSD on the PesticidePCBs fraction At approxinately 1100 am Mr Sullivan contacted Mike KTilbersh for a second time to inform him that the issue was being resolved and that one of tbe sanples requiring analysis for PesticidesPCBs would be used to perform the MSMSD analys is In order to do t h i s less volume would be used for the analysis of the sanple
(6)
bull gt gt bull - ^ ^ J - S - ^ bull bull bull bull bull ~ bull bull - ^ J f ^ 1 bull i
30 Bethods for Collecting Sanples
Prior to collecting groundvater sanples a two person Balsam team vent around the study area and measured the depth to water total veil depth and recorded the diameter of the monitoring wells Given this informatioi the sanpling crews were able to determine the necessary volune required to adequately purge the wells At a minimum three times the well volume was purged
Depending cn the diameter of the well Balsam used a 15 or a 30 inch diameter FVC bailer attached to a nylon cord All off-site bedrock wells were purged using a punp At monitoring well N9-18D FPC deserved that the water level in the well was pumped down nearly 50 feet prior to sanpling After the well was adequately purged two bailer volumes were wasted to the ground prior to sanpling At the locations v^re FPC collected split sanples with Balsam it was protocol that VQA bottles vere filled first followed by BNAs and PesticidePCBs and then inorganics Balsams sanpling teams collected extra volume in order to determine pH temperature and conductivity of the sanple Temperature and conductivity were determined inmediately after collecting the sanples sanples analyzed for p a were brou^ back to the staging area FPC observed that at every monitoring well location Balsams field crew ran a headspace test cm the purged water Ifcthe purged water elicited a HNu reading exceeding 10 parts per million (ppm) the water was drummed if not the water was dunped to the ground At well CW-4SR the headspace reading of the water sample was 17 ppm
Surface water sanples were obtained by submerging the bottles below the water surface All saqgtles were filled with the bottles facing upstream Care was taken in all cases that saiqples analyzed for VQAs didnt entrap any air bubbles Table 2 contains pH temperature and conductivity measurements for those sanples in which FPC collected splits
At sanple location S-6 FPC collected a sanple for analysis of VQAs and PesticidePCBs However (one of Balsams VQA vials broke after tightening the lid Balsam returned to this location and collected two additional VQA vials within ten minutes FPC didnt discard their sample and resanple
At each sanple location FPC recorded on a data description form pertinent field observations this information is provided in Apendix 3
(7)
I TABLE 2
Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire
pB Tenperature and Conductivity Measurements for Split Sanples
Round II Groundwater and Surface Water Sanpling September 27 and 28 1989
saricN NUHBER
STATION LOCATION BH
TTMP
_degc_ CONDUCT UMHOSCM
1 nw-8S 59 8 90 2 MM-13D 58 10 120 3 0W-4SR 6 1 14 360 4 n ^ l 8 D 66 12 208 56 MO-3SRMO-35D 6 3 8 5 220 7 MW-llD 58 15 45 89 S-3S-13 54 7 15
10 S-6 53 6 20 11 S-9 5 5 10 50
pH tenperature and conductivity was not recorded for trip blaiAs and performance evaluations sanples
(8)
bullm W raquo T ^rr
40 Sanple Paperwork and Shipping of Coolers
After collecting a sanple FPC logged the sample in on the diain-of-custody forms and traffic reports Information pertaining to sanpling time and date location preservative traffic number and analyte was recorded on each sample container and tag The bottles were sealed with strapping tape and custody seals Sanples were then placed in coolers and cushioned against breaking using absorbent material Sanples were kept cool using reusable ice packs
Two copies of the traffic reports and a copy of the chain-of-custody forms were sealed in t h e xpper lid of the cooler Two signed custody seals were placed an the coolers which were taped shut with strapping tape Ccpies of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms are provided in Afpendix 4
Sanples were shipped via Federal Express Ttie airbill number for each laboratory is as follows
Aquatec Inc - 4173910241 lEA - 4173910215 Chemtech Consulting Group - 4173910226
50 Ccmclusions
FPC collected all samples as anticipated FPC telefrfioned SMO on September 29 1989 to inform them that all sanples were shipped and that Case 12791 could be closed out
FPC feels that Balsam followed their sanpling and analysis plan vrtien collecting environmental sanples FPC believes that wells were adequately purged prior to sanpling and that purged water was adequately screened with an HNu prior to disposal Water levels and depth of the well were accurately measured to dthin 001 Care was taken by Balsam in not stirring up sediment prior to sanpling surface water
At 350 pm on September 29 1989 Nike Kulbersh received a call from Cindy Schreyer of SNQ Ms Schreyer informed Mr Kulbersh that the traffic n a a t e t B for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs would have to be renumbered and that a revised organic traffic report would have to be resubmitted to lEA and SMO The reason for revising the traffic report is that there nust be two distinctly different traffic report numbers for each laboratory FPC conplied with SNQ and sent a revised organic traffic report to lEA
Finally FPC was informed by Balsam that they were using Aquatech laboratories to analyze their sanples FPC requests that prior to the third round of groundwater ar^ surface water sanpling Balsam inform EPA as to gt^t laboratory (ies) they are planning to use so that FPC doesnt send their sanples to the same labs
(9)
h ^ ^ ^ I bull - - v - y y bull- bull bullbullbull-bull bull ^^^-~-V--V bullbullbullbullbull - bull bullbull^^^^^^v^^y^-^vgt shy
APPENDIX 1
Letter from Balsam to EPA September 15 1989
I bull|UillPMJLf
I rbullyyyyyli^^-ybull w^mrnr^^shy
I I I I I I t I 1
4BALSAM ErwennQ btvinrantrtti Scire amp M u i M Hygim
MfiliiaiRMtf 8laquollaquomNH8Q79
September 15 1989 Balsam Project 618G830
Mr R(tfer Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-GAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agen^ Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massadhufietts 02203
RE Recommendations for tlio Second Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)
Dear Mr Duwart
Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) has reviewed validated analytical data generated from the Hrst round of ground water surface water and sediment sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during April 1989 The purpose of this letter U to briefly discuss the analytical results the significance of the results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the second round of sampling The tables and figures referred to in this letter were provided to you during the progress meeting on September 22 1989 Sampling locations are indicated on Figures 1 2 and 3 Data reviewed included analytical results for Hazardous Substance List (HSL) volatile organic compound analyses (VOCs) HSL semivolatile organic compound analyses HSL pcstiddePCB analyses and HSL inorganic parameter analyses Summaries of the parameters detected in each sample are provided in the previously submitted drafl Tables 1 2 and 8 General diemistary parameters including chloride sulfate nitrate as N nitrite as N alkalinity biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were also analyzed at many locations Ground water from selected wells was also analyzed for total organic carbon (TOO and total and fecal coliform Tables 4 and 5 provided a summaiy of the general diemistry results
As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the second sampling round reported concentrations were compared to available federal or state standards or guidelines and trends or anomalies in data were noted Tle results of this data review and our recommendations for parameters to indude in thc second romd sampling program are sununarized below
BALSAM ENVlftONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
Balsam Prefect 6186830 Septemiber 161989 Page 2
HSL VolatUe Organic Compound Analyses
V0Clt6 were detected in twenty of the thirty-six monitoring wells sampled VOCs were confirmed present only ia on-site monitoring wells and consisted primarUy of chlorinated and aromatic compounds IndudinglTlHdichlagroethane^mdash ~ r dichloroethane 111-trichloroothane trichloroethene tolueacL xylenes and ethylbenzene Methyl-t-butyl-ether (MTBE) was not reportoa present above detection limits in any samples VOCs were reported to be detected at two of the ten surface water sampling locations (S-3 and S-9) boUi located in the lower swaleBrook A area VOCs were reported to be detected at five of the eight sediment sampling locations (S-l S-2 S-S S-9 and S-10)
HSL Semivolatile Organic Compound Analyses
HSL semivolatile organic compounds were reported to be present at low concentrations in ground water samples from four wells located at the base of the former disposal area (M0-2DR 0W-2SR 0W-2DR and CKW-4SRX Low concentrations of bb (2-e(hylhczyl) phthalate were also reported present in samplesfirom six weUs located on site and off site (MW-15S MW-15D MW-12S MW-13S MW-13D and M0-4D) Naphthalene and acenaphthene were reported present in ground water samples fi^m wells MW-15S and M0-4S respectively at low concentrations Bis (2-ethylhci^l) phthalate was the only semivolatile compound reported to be present in two of the ten surface water samples (S-2 and S-5) Three of the eight sediment samples contained semivolatile organic compounds Benzoic add and di-n-butylphuialate were reported to be present in one sediment sample (S-9) and only di-n-butylphthalate was detected In two sediment samples (S-2 and S-4)
HSL PesticidePCB Analyses
PCBs were reported to be present below contract required detection limits (CRDLs) but above instrument detection limits Ooss than 05 ppb) in ground water samples collectedfitgtm Umx wells located at the base of the former drum disposal area and in the dearing north of the swale (0W-2SR 0W-2DR 0W-8R and MW-llD) PCBt were reported to be present in six of tiie ten surface water samples collected Oess than 1 ppb) from the swale Brook A and the Exeter River (S-l S-2 S-5 8-8 S-9 and S-10) One sediment sample (S-10) collected at the base of the piggeiY waste pile was reported to conlak the pesticide 44shyDDE at a concentration less than 15 ppb
HSL Inorganic Parameter Analysoa
Results of HSL inorganic paramcta analyses were compared to state or federal maximum contaminant limits primary or secondary drinking yenrater standards and EPA Ambient Water Quality (Mtcria as appropriate Based upon these comparisons reported concentrations of arsenic iron and manganese in ground water samples exceeded guidelines for at least one parameter bi samples from
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC
r Balsam Project 6186830 September 151989 Page 8
filVeen wells located both on site and off site The only elevated arsenic concentration reported in an off-site sample was from MW-19D Results for surface water samples indicated iron manganese or silver exceeded guidelines ior_at least one parameter atfive j f the ien sampling locatJona It diould be noted that inm and manganese standardsarc aesthetic andjgtot health based ~ guidelines
Results of sediment analyses were compared to a United States Cieological Survey (USOS) reference document (USGS Professional Paper 1270) vHiidt jM^vides average element concentrations in soils for the eastem United States Results rexjorled for the sediment data Indicated above average concentrations of arsenic barium cobalt lead manganese nidcel and xinc at one sediment sampling location locatisd at Ihe tose of the piggery waste jrfle (S-10) However elevated concentrations were not present in data collected at downstream sampling locatiltms Slightly elevated concentrations of some parameters wore also observed at five other sediment sampling locations
General Chomlstiy Parameters
Total and fecal coliform results for ground water were reported below the available guidelines exduding a result f^m one off-site well (MW-16D) Results for sulfate chloride nitrate and nitrite in ground water were all reported at concenlratioas below available state or federal guidelines Aivomalies were not observed in Uie results for TOC analyses Alkalinity results in ground water were reported below state guidelines however relatively higher concentrations of this parameter wore noted in samples com wells whidi also had relatively high reported values of VOCs (0W2SR 0W2DR 0W-4SR 0W-4DR M0-2S and M0-3SR) A similar trend was observed for the results from BOD and COD analyses
PROPOSED AXALYHCAL SUITE
VOCs appear to be the primary contaminants identified in samples collected during the April samplingprogram noting that MTBE was not Identified present in any sanples iWefore VCXS should be included la the second sampling round whidi wiU indude the same monitoring well and surface water sampling loeaUons ss the first sampling round
Tlie semi-volatile organic compounds identified in thc first round were reported a t relatively low concentrations and primarily fi^m samples collected in areas where notable concentrations of V(Xs were also identified Ihe other az^as where semivolatile organic compounds were estimated to be present eudi as samples from well lfW-13 and off-site locations were generallv at concentrations below contract dctectiim limits and are common environmental eontaminants not Ukely to be related to activities at the Mottolo site Therefore BsJsam proposes to collect and analvxe a limited number of samples fitgtm wells where the presence of semivolatile organic compounds firom site activities was indicated
bull ^ - bull [J I I i raquo l I X - bull W i
bull bull t j 3- n j ^ f l bdquo i i w g u Wraquo
i
I
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
r
^
Balsam PntJect 6165830
September 15 1089 Page 4
The results of the pestiddePCB analyses Indicate that trace concentrations of Aroclor 1260 were detected In several surface water and ground water samples a t concentration below 1 ppb Therefore samples will be collected f^ PCB
-analysis fiomJocations where P(2Bs vere previously detected^-as-wdl as J ^ _ limited number of locations where PCBs were not r epor t^ present ~ - ~
l l i e inorganic parameter analytical results indicate elevated concentrations of arsenic Iron and manganese at several monitoring well locations Based upon the review of these data Balsam proposes to include arsenic in the second round analytical suite since this parameter appears to correlate best wlUi areas of on-site contamination and belaquoiuse of relatively low toxidty of iron and manganese
Analytical results for the general chemistrv parameters were generally within accepted limits for naturally occurring media and significant trends or anomalies In these data were not noted Therefore resampling and analyses fbr the general chemisliy parameters would not likely provide significant additional information to thc Mottolo data base or improve site diaracterization efforts
A summary of the proposed second round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attadied Table 1 Several locations whore contaminants were not detected in Uie f^st sampling round will also be resampled for selected parameters to confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We arc scheduled to conduct sampling activities the wedi of Septembor 26 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this woric on schedule Please do not hesitate io contact Eric Wood or either of the undersigned if you have any questions
Sincerely
1 ltcQ Timothy a Stone CPG Bl Prqjeet Manager
Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager
c c J Pdtonen (Stark ft Peltonen) M Robinette (NHDES)
lt90^415
Attachment
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
yaiiin
KJ QUINN CO
OFF-SITE MONITORING WELL
LOCATIONS
MOTTOLO RIFS
WBms-FIG 2 18581
AQ-Organic traffic report number
22 Preservatiwi of Sanples
Sanples analyzed for volatile organics were shipped pre-preserved with 11 l ^ roch lo r i c acid (HCL) VOA sanples were collected in two 40 ml glass v ia l s
Samples analyzed for metals were shipped in a one l i t e r polyethylene bottle containing n i t r ic add (HNQ ) All metal sanples with the exception of MAL544 (M9-101) and MAL545 (MW-102) were field f i l t e r e d by Balsam with a Nalge punp equipped with a 045 micron f i l t e r Samples MAL544 and MAL545 vere performance evaltiation samples submitted to FPC by Lisa Gatton Vidulich Region 2 deputy program officer FPC does not know v ^ t h e r these samples contained n i t r i c acid as a preservative The content of these samples was unknown to FPC
Sanples analyzed for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs were shipped unpreserved in 80 oz sabet glass jugs
23 Quality Assurance Sanples
FPC submitted two t r i p blades for analyses of vo la t i l e organics These sanples were fil led vi th d i s t i l l e d water on September 26 1989 and b rou^ t to the s i te viere they were logged in an the t r a f f i c report and chain-of-custody forms as SW-TBl and SW-TB2 The t r a f f i c report numbers assigned to these sanples are AQ412 and AQ413 respectively
A duplicate groundwater saiple and a surface water sanple were collected a t M0-3SR and S-3 respectively The duplicate groundwater sample was labeled as HQ-35D and the duplicate surface water sanple was labeled as S-13 on the t r a f f i c reports and chain-of-custody forms
At 0W-4SR FPC collected additioned sanple volume for the laboratories to conduct a matrix spike and a matrix spike dupl icate (MSMSD) analysis Triple the volune was collected for v o l a t i l e organics and BNAs and twice the volume for metals as required by EPAs sanple management office (SNQ)
FPC received a ca l l from Jim Sullivan of ESAT an September 29 1989 Hr Sullivan informed Hike Kulbersh tha t lEA laboratory contacted SMO the morning of Septenber 29 1989 to inform them that there wasn t sufficient volume for lEA to perform the MSMSD on the PesticidePCBs fraction At approxinately 1100 am Mr Sullivan contacted Mike KTilbersh for a second time to inform him that the issue was being resolved and that one of tbe sanples requiring analysis for PesticidesPCBs would be used to perform the MSMSD analys is In order to do t h i s less volume would be used for the analysis of the sanple
(6)
bull gt gt bull - ^ ^ J - S - ^ bull bull bull bull bull ~ bull bull - ^ J f ^ 1 bull i
30 Bethods for Collecting Sanples
Prior to collecting groundvater sanples a two person Balsam team vent around the study area and measured the depth to water total veil depth and recorded the diameter of the monitoring wells Given this informatioi the sanpling crews were able to determine the necessary volune required to adequately purge the wells At a minimum three times the well volume was purged
Depending cn the diameter of the well Balsam used a 15 or a 30 inch diameter FVC bailer attached to a nylon cord All off-site bedrock wells were purged using a punp At monitoring well N9-18D FPC deserved that the water level in the well was pumped down nearly 50 feet prior to sanpling After the well was adequately purged two bailer volumes were wasted to the ground prior to sanpling At the locations v^re FPC collected split sanples with Balsam it was protocol that VQA bottles vere filled first followed by BNAs and PesticidePCBs and then inorganics Balsams sanpling teams collected extra volume in order to determine pH temperature and conductivity of the sanple Temperature and conductivity were determined inmediately after collecting the sanples sanples analyzed for p a were brou^ back to the staging area FPC observed that at every monitoring well location Balsams field crew ran a headspace test cm the purged water Ifcthe purged water elicited a HNu reading exceeding 10 parts per million (ppm) the water was drummed if not the water was dunped to the ground At well CW-4SR the headspace reading of the water sample was 17 ppm
Surface water sanples were obtained by submerging the bottles below the water surface All saqgtles were filled with the bottles facing upstream Care was taken in all cases that saiqples analyzed for VQAs didnt entrap any air bubbles Table 2 contains pH temperature and conductivity measurements for those sanples in which FPC collected splits
At sanple location S-6 FPC collected a sanple for analysis of VQAs and PesticidePCBs However (one of Balsams VQA vials broke after tightening the lid Balsam returned to this location and collected two additional VQA vials within ten minutes FPC didnt discard their sample and resanple
At each sanple location FPC recorded on a data description form pertinent field observations this information is provided in Apendix 3
(7)
I TABLE 2
Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire
pB Tenperature and Conductivity Measurements for Split Sanples
Round II Groundwater and Surface Water Sanpling September 27 and 28 1989
saricN NUHBER
STATION LOCATION BH
TTMP
_degc_ CONDUCT UMHOSCM
1 nw-8S 59 8 90 2 MM-13D 58 10 120 3 0W-4SR 6 1 14 360 4 n ^ l 8 D 66 12 208 56 MO-3SRMO-35D 6 3 8 5 220 7 MW-llD 58 15 45 89 S-3S-13 54 7 15
10 S-6 53 6 20 11 S-9 5 5 10 50
pH tenperature and conductivity was not recorded for trip blaiAs and performance evaluations sanples
(8)
bullm W raquo T ^rr
40 Sanple Paperwork and Shipping of Coolers
After collecting a sanple FPC logged the sample in on the diain-of-custody forms and traffic reports Information pertaining to sanpling time and date location preservative traffic number and analyte was recorded on each sample container and tag The bottles were sealed with strapping tape and custody seals Sanples were then placed in coolers and cushioned against breaking using absorbent material Sanples were kept cool using reusable ice packs
Two copies of the traffic reports and a copy of the chain-of-custody forms were sealed in t h e xpper lid of the cooler Two signed custody seals were placed an the coolers which were taped shut with strapping tape Ccpies of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms are provided in Afpendix 4
Sanples were shipped via Federal Express Ttie airbill number for each laboratory is as follows
Aquatec Inc - 4173910241 lEA - 4173910215 Chemtech Consulting Group - 4173910226
50 Ccmclusions
FPC collected all samples as anticipated FPC telefrfioned SMO on September 29 1989 to inform them that all sanples were shipped and that Case 12791 could be closed out
FPC feels that Balsam followed their sanpling and analysis plan vrtien collecting environmental sanples FPC believes that wells were adequately purged prior to sanpling and that purged water was adequately screened with an HNu prior to disposal Water levels and depth of the well were accurately measured to dthin 001 Care was taken by Balsam in not stirring up sediment prior to sanpling surface water
At 350 pm on September 29 1989 Nike Kulbersh received a call from Cindy Schreyer of SNQ Ms Schreyer informed Mr Kulbersh that the traffic n a a t e t B for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs would have to be renumbered and that a revised organic traffic report would have to be resubmitted to lEA and SMO The reason for revising the traffic report is that there nust be two distinctly different traffic report numbers for each laboratory FPC conplied with SNQ and sent a revised organic traffic report to lEA
Finally FPC was informed by Balsam that they were using Aquatech laboratories to analyze their sanples FPC requests that prior to the third round of groundwater ar^ surface water sanpling Balsam inform EPA as to gt^t laboratory (ies) they are planning to use so that FPC doesnt send their sanples to the same labs
(9)
h ^ ^ ^ I bull - - v - y y bull- bull bullbullbull-bull bull ^^^-~-V--V bullbullbullbullbull - bull bullbull^^^^^^v^^y^-^vgt shy
APPENDIX 1
Letter from Balsam to EPA September 15 1989
I bull|UillPMJLf
I rbullyyyyyli^^-ybull w^mrnr^^shy
I I I I I I t I 1
4BALSAM ErwennQ btvinrantrtti Scire amp M u i M Hygim
MfiliiaiRMtf 8laquollaquomNH8Q79
September 15 1989 Balsam Project 618G830
Mr R(tfer Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-GAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agen^ Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massadhufietts 02203
RE Recommendations for tlio Second Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)
Dear Mr Duwart
Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) has reviewed validated analytical data generated from the Hrst round of ground water surface water and sediment sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during April 1989 The purpose of this letter U to briefly discuss the analytical results the significance of the results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the second round of sampling The tables and figures referred to in this letter were provided to you during the progress meeting on September 22 1989 Sampling locations are indicated on Figures 1 2 and 3 Data reviewed included analytical results for Hazardous Substance List (HSL) volatile organic compound analyses (VOCs) HSL semivolatile organic compound analyses HSL pcstiddePCB analyses and HSL inorganic parameter analyses Summaries of the parameters detected in each sample are provided in the previously submitted drafl Tables 1 2 and 8 General diemistary parameters including chloride sulfate nitrate as N nitrite as N alkalinity biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were also analyzed at many locations Ground water from selected wells was also analyzed for total organic carbon (TOO and total and fecal coliform Tables 4 and 5 provided a summaiy of the general diemistry results
As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the second sampling round reported concentrations were compared to available federal or state standards or guidelines and trends or anomalies in data were noted Tle results of this data review and our recommendations for parameters to indude in thc second romd sampling program are sununarized below
BALSAM ENVlftONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
Balsam Prefect 6186830 Septemiber 161989 Page 2
HSL VolatUe Organic Compound Analyses
V0Clt6 were detected in twenty of the thirty-six monitoring wells sampled VOCs were confirmed present only ia on-site monitoring wells and consisted primarUy of chlorinated and aromatic compounds IndudinglTlHdichlagroethane^mdash ~ r dichloroethane 111-trichloroothane trichloroethene tolueacL xylenes and ethylbenzene Methyl-t-butyl-ether (MTBE) was not reportoa present above detection limits in any samples VOCs were reported to be detected at two of the ten surface water sampling locations (S-3 and S-9) boUi located in the lower swaleBrook A area VOCs were reported to be detected at five of the eight sediment sampling locations (S-l S-2 S-S S-9 and S-10)
HSL Semivolatile Organic Compound Analyses
HSL semivolatile organic compounds were reported to be present at low concentrations in ground water samples from four wells located at the base of the former disposal area (M0-2DR 0W-2SR 0W-2DR and CKW-4SRX Low concentrations of bb (2-e(hylhczyl) phthalate were also reported present in samplesfirom six weUs located on site and off site (MW-15S MW-15D MW-12S MW-13S MW-13D and M0-4D) Naphthalene and acenaphthene were reported present in ground water samples fi^m wells MW-15S and M0-4S respectively at low concentrations Bis (2-ethylhci^l) phthalate was the only semivolatile compound reported to be present in two of the ten surface water samples (S-2 and S-5) Three of the eight sediment samples contained semivolatile organic compounds Benzoic add and di-n-butylphuialate were reported to be present in one sediment sample (S-9) and only di-n-butylphthalate was detected In two sediment samples (S-2 and S-4)
HSL PesticidePCB Analyses
PCBs were reported to be present below contract required detection limits (CRDLs) but above instrument detection limits Ooss than 05 ppb) in ground water samples collectedfitgtm Umx wells located at the base of the former drum disposal area and in the dearing north of the swale (0W-2SR 0W-2DR 0W-8R and MW-llD) PCBt were reported to be present in six of tiie ten surface water samples collected Oess than 1 ppb) from the swale Brook A and the Exeter River (S-l S-2 S-5 8-8 S-9 and S-10) One sediment sample (S-10) collected at the base of the piggeiY waste pile was reported to conlak the pesticide 44shyDDE at a concentration less than 15 ppb
HSL Inorganic Parameter Analysoa
Results of HSL inorganic paramcta analyses were compared to state or federal maximum contaminant limits primary or secondary drinking yenrater standards and EPA Ambient Water Quality (Mtcria as appropriate Based upon these comparisons reported concentrations of arsenic iron and manganese in ground water samples exceeded guidelines for at least one parameter bi samples from
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC
r Balsam Project 6186830 September 151989 Page 8
filVeen wells located both on site and off site The only elevated arsenic concentration reported in an off-site sample was from MW-19D Results for surface water samples indicated iron manganese or silver exceeded guidelines ior_at least one parameter atfive j f the ien sampling locatJona It diould be noted that inm and manganese standardsarc aesthetic andjgtot health based ~ guidelines
Results of sediment analyses were compared to a United States Cieological Survey (USOS) reference document (USGS Professional Paper 1270) vHiidt jM^vides average element concentrations in soils for the eastem United States Results rexjorled for the sediment data Indicated above average concentrations of arsenic barium cobalt lead manganese nidcel and xinc at one sediment sampling location locatisd at Ihe tose of the piggery waste jrfle (S-10) However elevated concentrations were not present in data collected at downstream sampling locatiltms Slightly elevated concentrations of some parameters wore also observed at five other sediment sampling locations
General Chomlstiy Parameters
Total and fecal coliform results for ground water were reported below the available guidelines exduding a result f^m one off-site well (MW-16D) Results for sulfate chloride nitrate and nitrite in ground water were all reported at concenlratioas below available state or federal guidelines Aivomalies were not observed in Uie results for TOC analyses Alkalinity results in ground water were reported below state guidelines however relatively higher concentrations of this parameter wore noted in samples com wells whidi also had relatively high reported values of VOCs (0W2SR 0W2DR 0W-4SR 0W-4DR M0-2S and M0-3SR) A similar trend was observed for the results from BOD and COD analyses
PROPOSED AXALYHCAL SUITE
VOCs appear to be the primary contaminants identified in samples collected during the April samplingprogram noting that MTBE was not Identified present in any sanples iWefore VCXS should be included la the second sampling round whidi wiU indude the same monitoring well and surface water sampling loeaUons ss the first sampling round
Tlie semi-volatile organic compounds identified in thc first round were reported a t relatively low concentrations and primarily fi^m samples collected in areas where notable concentrations of V(Xs were also identified Ihe other az^as where semivolatile organic compounds were estimated to be present eudi as samples from well lfW-13 and off-site locations were generallv at concentrations below contract dctectiim limits and are common environmental eontaminants not Ukely to be related to activities at the Mottolo site Therefore BsJsam proposes to collect and analvxe a limited number of samples fitgtm wells where the presence of semivolatile organic compounds firom site activities was indicated
bull ^ - bull [J I I i raquo l I X - bull W i
bull bull t j 3- n j ^ f l bdquo i i w g u Wraquo
i
I
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
r
^
Balsam PntJect 6165830
September 15 1089 Page 4
The results of the pestiddePCB analyses Indicate that trace concentrations of Aroclor 1260 were detected In several surface water and ground water samples a t concentration below 1 ppb Therefore samples will be collected f^ PCB
-analysis fiomJocations where P(2Bs vere previously detected^-as-wdl as J ^ _ limited number of locations where PCBs were not r epor t^ present ~ - ~
l l i e inorganic parameter analytical results indicate elevated concentrations of arsenic Iron and manganese at several monitoring well locations Based upon the review of these data Balsam proposes to include arsenic in the second round analytical suite since this parameter appears to correlate best wlUi areas of on-site contamination and belaquoiuse of relatively low toxidty of iron and manganese
Analytical results for the general chemistrv parameters were generally within accepted limits for naturally occurring media and significant trends or anomalies In these data were not noted Therefore resampling and analyses fbr the general chemisliy parameters would not likely provide significant additional information to thc Mottolo data base or improve site diaracterization efforts
A summary of the proposed second round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attadied Table 1 Several locations whore contaminants were not detected in Uie f^st sampling round will also be resampled for selected parameters to confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We arc scheduled to conduct sampling activities the wedi of Septembor 26 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this woric on schedule Please do not hesitate io contact Eric Wood or either of the undersigned if you have any questions
Sincerely
1 ltcQ Timothy a Stone CPG Bl Prqjeet Manager
Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager
c c J Pdtonen (Stark ft Peltonen) M Robinette (NHDES)
lt90^415
Attachment
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
22 Preservatiwi of Sanples
Sanples analyzed for volatile organics were shipped pre-preserved with 11 l ^ roch lo r i c acid (HCL) VOA sanples were collected in two 40 ml glass v ia l s
Samples analyzed for metals were shipped in a one l i t e r polyethylene bottle containing n i t r ic add (HNQ ) All metal sanples with the exception of MAL544 (M9-101) and MAL545 (MW-102) were field f i l t e r e d by Balsam with a Nalge punp equipped with a 045 micron f i l t e r Samples MAL544 and MAL545 vere performance evaltiation samples submitted to FPC by Lisa Gatton Vidulich Region 2 deputy program officer FPC does not know v ^ t h e r these samples contained n i t r i c acid as a preservative The content of these samples was unknown to FPC
Sanples analyzed for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs were shipped unpreserved in 80 oz sabet glass jugs
23 Quality Assurance Sanples
FPC submitted two t r i p blades for analyses of vo la t i l e organics These sanples were fil led vi th d i s t i l l e d water on September 26 1989 and b rou^ t to the s i te viere they were logged in an the t r a f f i c report and chain-of-custody forms as SW-TBl and SW-TB2 The t r a f f i c report numbers assigned to these sanples are AQ412 and AQ413 respectively
A duplicate groundwater saiple and a surface water sanple were collected a t M0-3SR and S-3 respectively The duplicate groundwater sample was labeled as HQ-35D and the duplicate surface water sanple was labeled as S-13 on the t r a f f i c reports and chain-of-custody forms
At 0W-4SR FPC collected additioned sanple volume for the laboratories to conduct a matrix spike and a matrix spike dupl icate (MSMSD) analysis Triple the volune was collected for v o l a t i l e organics and BNAs and twice the volume for metals as required by EPAs sanple management office (SNQ)
FPC received a ca l l from Jim Sullivan of ESAT an September 29 1989 Hr Sullivan informed Hike Kulbersh tha t lEA laboratory contacted SMO the morning of Septenber 29 1989 to inform them that there wasn t sufficient volume for lEA to perform the MSMSD on the PesticidePCBs fraction At approxinately 1100 am Mr Sullivan contacted Mike KTilbersh for a second time to inform him that the issue was being resolved and that one of tbe sanples requiring analysis for PesticidesPCBs would be used to perform the MSMSD analys is In order to do t h i s less volume would be used for the analysis of the sanple
(6)
bull gt gt bull - ^ ^ J - S - ^ bull bull bull bull bull ~ bull bull - ^ J f ^ 1 bull i
30 Bethods for Collecting Sanples
Prior to collecting groundvater sanples a two person Balsam team vent around the study area and measured the depth to water total veil depth and recorded the diameter of the monitoring wells Given this informatioi the sanpling crews were able to determine the necessary volune required to adequately purge the wells At a minimum three times the well volume was purged
Depending cn the diameter of the well Balsam used a 15 or a 30 inch diameter FVC bailer attached to a nylon cord All off-site bedrock wells were purged using a punp At monitoring well N9-18D FPC deserved that the water level in the well was pumped down nearly 50 feet prior to sanpling After the well was adequately purged two bailer volumes were wasted to the ground prior to sanpling At the locations v^re FPC collected split sanples with Balsam it was protocol that VQA bottles vere filled first followed by BNAs and PesticidePCBs and then inorganics Balsams sanpling teams collected extra volume in order to determine pH temperature and conductivity of the sanple Temperature and conductivity were determined inmediately after collecting the sanples sanples analyzed for p a were brou^ back to the staging area FPC observed that at every monitoring well location Balsams field crew ran a headspace test cm the purged water Ifcthe purged water elicited a HNu reading exceeding 10 parts per million (ppm) the water was drummed if not the water was dunped to the ground At well CW-4SR the headspace reading of the water sample was 17 ppm
Surface water sanples were obtained by submerging the bottles below the water surface All saqgtles were filled with the bottles facing upstream Care was taken in all cases that saiqples analyzed for VQAs didnt entrap any air bubbles Table 2 contains pH temperature and conductivity measurements for those sanples in which FPC collected splits
At sanple location S-6 FPC collected a sanple for analysis of VQAs and PesticidePCBs However (one of Balsams VQA vials broke after tightening the lid Balsam returned to this location and collected two additional VQA vials within ten minutes FPC didnt discard their sample and resanple
At each sanple location FPC recorded on a data description form pertinent field observations this information is provided in Apendix 3
(7)
I TABLE 2
Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire
pB Tenperature and Conductivity Measurements for Split Sanples
Round II Groundwater and Surface Water Sanpling September 27 and 28 1989
saricN NUHBER
STATION LOCATION BH
TTMP
_degc_ CONDUCT UMHOSCM
1 nw-8S 59 8 90 2 MM-13D 58 10 120 3 0W-4SR 6 1 14 360 4 n ^ l 8 D 66 12 208 56 MO-3SRMO-35D 6 3 8 5 220 7 MW-llD 58 15 45 89 S-3S-13 54 7 15
10 S-6 53 6 20 11 S-9 5 5 10 50
pH tenperature and conductivity was not recorded for trip blaiAs and performance evaluations sanples
(8)
bullm W raquo T ^rr
40 Sanple Paperwork and Shipping of Coolers
After collecting a sanple FPC logged the sample in on the diain-of-custody forms and traffic reports Information pertaining to sanpling time and date location preservative traffic number and analyte was recorded on each sample container and tag The bottles were sealed with strapping tape and custody seals Sanples were then placed in coolers and cushioned against breaking using absorbent material Sanples were kept cool using reusable ice packs
Two copies of the traffic reports and a copy of the chain-of-custody forms were sealed in t h e xpper lid of the cooler Two signed custody seals were placed an the coolers which were taped shut with strapping tape Ccpies of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms are provided in Afpendix 4
Sanples were shipped via Federal Express Ttie airbill number for each laboratory is as follows
Aquatec Inc - 4173910241 lEA - 4173910215 Chemtech Consulting Group - 4173910226
50 Ccmclusions
FPC collected all samples as anticipated FPC telefrfioned SMO on September 29 1989 to inform them that all sanples were shipped and that Case 12791 could be closed out
FPC feels that Balsam followed their sanpling and analysis plan vrtien collecting environmental sanples FPC believes that wells were adequately purged prior to sanpling and that purged water was adequately screened with an HNu prior to disposal Water levels and depth of the well were accurately measured to dthin 001 Care was taken by Balsam in not stirring up sediment prior to sanpling surface water
At 350 pm on September 29 1989 Nike Kulbersh received a call from Cindy Schreyer of SNQ Ms Schreyer informed Mr Kulbersh that the traffic n a a t e t B for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs would have to be renumbered and that a revised organic traffic report would have to be resubmitted to lEA and SMO The reason for revising the traffic report is that there nust be two distinctly different traffic report numbers for each laboratory FPC conplied with SNQ and sent a revised organic traffic report to lEA
Finally FPC was informed by Balsam that they were using Aquatech laboratories to analyze their sanples FPC requests that prior to the third round of groundwater ar^ surface water sanpling Balsam inform EPA as to gt^t laboratory (ies) they are planning to use so that FPC doesnt send their sanples to the same labs
(9)
h ^ ^ ^ I bull - - v - y y bull- bull bullbullbull-bull bull ^^^-~-V--V bullbullbullbullbull - bull bullbull^^^^^^v^^y^-^vgt shy
APPENDIX 1
Letter from Balsam to EPA September 15 1989
I bull|UillPMJLf
I rbullyyyyyli^^-ybull w^mrnr^^shy
I I I I I I t I 1
4BALSAM ErwennQ btvinrantrtti Scire amp M u i M Hygim
MfiliiaiRMtf 8laquollaquomNH8Q79
September 15 1989 Balsam Project 618G830
Mr R(tfer Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-GAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agen^ Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massadhufietts 02203
RE Recommendations for tlio Second Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)
Dear Mr Duwart
Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) has reviewed validated analytical data generated from the Hrst round of ground water surface water and sediment sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during April 1989 The purpose of this letter U to briefly discuss the analytical results the significance of the results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the second round of sampling The tables and figures referred to in this letter were provided to you during the progress meeting on September 22 1989 Sampling locations are indicated on Figures 1 2 and 3 Data reviewed included analytical results for Hazardous Substance List (HSL) volatile organic compound analyses (VOCs) HSL semivolatile organic compound analyses HSL pcstiddePCB analyses and HSL inorganic parameter analyses Summaries of the parameters detected in each sample are provided in the previously submitted drafl Tables 1 2 and 8 General diemistary parameters including chloride sulfate nitrate as N nitrite as N alkalinity biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were also analyzed at many locations Ground water from selected wells was also analyzed for total organic carbon (TOO and total and fecal coliform Tables 4 and 5 provided a summaiy of the general diemistry results
As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the second sampling round reported concentrations were compared to available federal or state standards or guidelines and trends or anomalies in data were noted Tle results of this data review and our recommendations for parameters to indude in thc second romd sampling program are sununarized below
BALSAM ENVlftONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
Balsam Prefect 6186830 Septemiber 161989 Page 2
HSL VolatUe Organic Compound Analyses
V0Clt6 were detected in twenty of the thirty-six monitoring wells sampled VOCs were confirmed present only ia on-site monitoring wells and consisted primarUy of chlorinated and aromatic compounds IndudinglTlHdichlagroethane^mdash ~ r dichloroethane 111-trichloroothane trichloroethene tolueacL xylenes and ethylbenzene Methyl-t-butyl-ether (MTBE) was not reportoa present above detection limits in any samples VOCs were reported to be detected at two of the ten surface water sampling locations (S-3 and S-9) boUi located in the lower swaleBrook A area VOCs were reported to be detected at five of the eight sediment sampling locations (S-l S-2 S-S S-9 and S-10)
HSL Semivolatile Organic Compound Analyses
HSL semivolatile organic compounds were reported to be present at low concentrations in ground water samples from four wells located at the base of the former disposal area (M0-2DR 0W-2SR 0W-2DR and CKW-4SRX Low concentrations of bb (2-e(hylhczyl) phthalate were also reported present in samplesfirom six weUs located on site and off site (MW-15S MW-15D MW-12S MW-13S MW-13D and M0-4D) Naphthalene and acenaphthene were reported present in ground water samples fi^m wells MW-15S and M0-4S respectively at low concentrations Bis (2-ethylhci^l) phthalate was the only semivolatile compound reported to be present in two of the ten surface water samples (S-2 and S-5) Three of the eight sediment samples contained semivolatile organic compounds Benzoic add and di-n-butylphuialate were reported to be present in one sediment sample (S-9) and only di-n-butylphthalate was detected In two sediment samples (S-2 and S-4)
HSL PesticidePCB Analyses
PCBs were reported to be present below contract required detection limits (CRDLs) but above instrument detection limits Ooss than 05 ppb) in ground water samples collectedfitgtm Umx wells located at the base of the former drum disposal area and in the dearing north of the swale (0W-2SR 0W-2DR 0W-8R and MW-llD) PCBt were reported to be present in six of tiie ten surface water samples collected Oess than 1 ppb) from the swale Brook A and the Exeter River (S-l S-2 S-5 8-8 S-9 and S-10) One sediment sample (S-10) collected at the base of the piggeiY waste pile was reported to conlak the pesticide 44shyDDE at a concentration less than 15 ppb
HSL Inorganic Parameter Analysoa
Results of HSL inorganic paramcta analyses were compared to state or federal maximum contaminant limits primary or secondary drinking yenrater standards and EPA Ambient Water Quality (Mtcria as appropriate Based upon these comparisons reported concentrations of arsenic iron and manganese in ground water samples exceeded guidelines for at least one parameter bi samples from
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC
r Balsam Project 6186830 September 151989 Page 8
filVeen wells located both on site and off site The only elevated arsenic concentration reported in an off-site sample was from MW-19D Results for surface water samples indicated iron manganese or silver exceeded guidelines ior_at least one parameter atfive j f the ien sampling locatJona It diould be noted that inm and manganese standardsarc aesthetic andjgtot health based ~ guidelines
Results of sediment analyses were compared to a United States Cieological Survey (USOS) reference document (USGS Professional Paper 1270) vHiidt jM^vides average element concentrations in soils for the eastem United States Results rexjorled for the sediment data Indicated above average concentrations of arsenic barium cobalt lead manganese nidcel and xinc at one sediment sampling location locatisd at Ihe tose of the piggery waste jrfle (S-10) However elevated concentrations were not present in data collected at downstream sampling locatiltms Slightly elevated concentrations of some parameters wore also observed at five other sediment sampling locations
General Chomlstiy Parameters
Total and fecal coliform results for ground water were reported below the available guidelines exduding a result f^m one off-site well (MW-16D) Results for sulfate chloride nitrate and nitrite in ground water were all reported at concenlratioas below available state or federal guidelines Aivomalies were not observed in Uie results for TOC analyses Alkalinity results in ground water were reported below state guidelines however relatively higher concentrations of this parameter wore noted in samples com wells whidi also had relatively high reported values of VOCs (0W2SR 0W2DR 0W-4SR 0W-4DR M0-2S and M0-3SR) A similar trend was observed for the results from BOD and COD analyses
PROPOSED AXALYHCAL SUITE
VOCs appear to be the primary contaminants identified in samples collected during the April samplingprogram noting that MTBE was not Identified present in any sanples iWefore VCXS should be included la the second sampling round whidi wiU indude the same monitoring well and surface water sampling loeaUons ss the first sampling round
Tlie semi-volatile organic compounds identified in thc first round were reported a t relatively low concentrations and primarily fi^m samples collected in areas where notable concentrations of V(Xs were also identified Ihe other az^as where semivolatile organic compounds were estimated to be present eudi as samples from well lfW-13 and off-site locations were generallv at concentrations below contract dctectiim limits and are common environmental eontaminants not Ukely to be related to activities at the Mottolo site Therefore BsJsam proposes to collect and analvxe a limited number of samples fitgtm wells where the presence of semivolatile organic compounds firom site activities was indicated
bull ^ - bull [J I I i raquo l I X - bull W i
bull bull t j 3- n j ^ f l bdquo i i w g u Wraquo
i
I
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
r
^
Balsam PntJect 6165830
September 15 1089 Page 4
The results of the pestiddePCB analyses Indicate that trace concentrations of Aroclor 1260 were detected In several surface water and ground water samples a t concentration below 1 ppb Therefore samples will be collected f^ PCB
-analysis fiomJocations where P(2Bs vere previously detected^-as-wdl as J ^ _ limited number of locations where PCBs were not r epor t^ present ~ - ~
l l i e inorganic parameter analytical results indicate elevated concentrations of arsenic Iron and manganese at several monitoring well locations Based upon the review of these data Balsam proposes to include arsenic in the second round analytical suite since this parameter appears to correlate best wlUi areas of on-site contamination and belaquoiuse of relatively low toxidty of iron and manganese
Analytical results for the general chemistrv parameters were generally within accepted limits for naturally occurring media and significant trends or anomalies In these data were not noted Therefore resampling and analyses fbr the general chemisliy parameters would not likely provide significant additional information to thc Mottolo data base or improve site diaracterization efforts
A summary of the proposed second round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attadied Table 1 Several locations whore contaminants were not detected in Uie f^st sampling round will also be resampled for selected parameters to confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We arc scheduled to conduct sampling activities the wedi of Septembor 26 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this woric on schedule Please do not hesitate io contact Eric Wood or either of the undersigned if you have any questions
Sincerely
1 ltcQ Timothy a Stone CPG Bl Prqjeet Manager
Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager
c c J Pdtonen (Stark ft Peltonen) M Robinette (NHDES)
lt90^415
Attachment
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
30 Bethods for Collecting Sanples
Prior to collecting groundvater sanples a two person Balsam team vent around the study area and measured the depth to water total veil depth and recorded the diameter of the monitoring wells Given this informatioi the sanpling crews were able to determine the necessary volune required to adequately purge the wells At a minimum three times the well volume was purged
Depending cn the diameter of the well Balsam used a 15 or a 30 inch diameter FVC bailer attached to a nylon cord All off-site bedrock wells were purged using a punp At monitoring well N9-18D FPC deserved that the water level in the well was pumped down nearly 50 feet prior to sanpling After the well was adequately purged two bailer volumes were wasted to the ground prior to sanpling At the locations v^re FPC collected split sanples with Balsam it was protocol that VQA bottles vere filled first followed by BNAs and PesticidePCBs and then inorganics Balsams sanpling teams collected extra volume in order to determine pH temperature and conductivity of the sanple Temperature and conductivity were determined inmediately after collecting the sanples sanples analyzed for p a were brou^ back to the staging area FPC observed that at every monitoring well location Balsams field crew ran a headspace test cm the purged water Ifcthe purged water elicited a HNu reading exceeding 10 parts per million (ppm) the water was drummed if not the water was dunped to the ground At well CW-4SR the headspace reading of the water sample was 17 ppm
Surface water sanples were obtained by submerging the bottles below the water surface All saqgtles were filled with the bottles facing upstream Care was taken in all cases that saiqples analyzed for VQAs didnt entrap any air bubbles Table 2 contains pH temperature and conductivity measurements for those sanples in which FPC collected splits
At sanple location S-6 FPC collected a sanple for analysis of VQAs and PesticidePCBs However (one of Balsams VQA vials broke after tightening the lid Balsam returned to this location and collected two additional VQA vials within ten minutes FPC didnt discard their sample and resanple
At each sanple location FPC recorded on a data description form pertinent field observations this information is provided in Apendix 3
(7)
I TABLE 2
Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire
pB Tenperature and Conductivity Measurements for Split Sanples
Round II Groundwater and Surface Water Sanpling September 27 and 28 1989
saricN NUHBER
STATION LOCATION BH
TTMP
_degc_ CONDUCT UMHOSCM
1 nw-8S 59 8 90 2 MM-13D 58 10 120 3 0W-4SR 6 1 14 360 4 n ^ l 8 D 66 12 208 56 MO-3SRMO-35D 6 3 8 5 220 7 MW-llD 58 15 45 89 S-3S-13 54 7 15
10 S-6 53 6 20 11 S-9 5 5 10 50
pH tenperature and conductivity was not recorded for trip blaiAs and performance evaluations sanples
(8)
bullm W raquo T ^rr
40 Sanple Paperwork and Shipping of Coolers
After collecting a sanple FPC logged the sample in on the diain-of-custody forms and traffic reports Information pertaining to sanpling time and date location preservative traffic number and analyte was recorded on each sample container and tag The bottles were sealed with strapping tape and custody seals Sanples were then placed in coolers and cushioned against breaking using absorbent material Sanples were kept cool using reusable ice packs
Two copies of the traffic reports and a copy of the chain-of-custody forms were sealed in t h e xpper lid of the cooler Two signed custody seals were placed an the coolers which were taped shut with strapping tape Ccpies of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms are provided in Afpendix 4
Sanples were shipped via Federal Express Ttie airbill number for each laboratory is as follows
Aquatec Inc - 4173910241 lEA - 4173910215 Chemtech Consulting Group - 4173910226
50 Ccmclusions
FPC collected all samples as anticipated FPC telefrfioned SMO on September 29 1989 to inform them that all sanples were shipped and that Case 12791 could be closed out
FPC feels that Balsam followed their sanpling and analysis plan vrtien collecting environmental sanples FPC believes that wells were adequately purged prior to sanpling and that purged water was adequately screened with an HNu prior to disposal Water levels and depth of the well were accurately measured to dthin 001 Care was taken by Balsam in not stirring up sediment prior to sanpling surface water
At 350 pm on September 29 1989 Nike Kulbersh received a call from Cindy Schreyer of SNQ Ms Schreyer informed Mr Kulbersh that the traffic n a a t e t B for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs would have to be renumbered and that a revised organic traffic report would have to be resubmitted to lEA and SMO The reason for revising the traffic report is that there nust be two distinctly different traffic report numbers for each laboratory FPC conplied with SNQ and sent a revised organic traffic report to lEA
Finally FPC was informed by Balsam that they were using Aquatech laboratories to analyze their sanples FPC requests that prior to the third round of groundwater ar^ surface water sanpling Balsam inform EPA as to gt^t laboratory (ies) they are planning to use so that FPC doesnt send their sanples to the same labs
(9)
h ^ ^ ^ I bull - - v - y y bull- bull bullbullbull-bull bull ^^^-~-V--V bullbullbullbullbull - bull bullbull^^^^^^v^^y^-^vgt shy
APPENDIX 1
Letter from Balsam to EPA September 15 1989
I bull|UillPMJLf
I rbullyyyyyli^^-ybull w^mrnr^^shy
I I I I I I t I 1
4BALSAM ErwennQ btvinrantrtti Scire amp M u i M Hygim
MfiliiaiRMtf 8laquollaquomNH8Q79
September 15 1989 Balsam Project 618G830
Mr R(tfer Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-GAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agen^ Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massadhufietts 02203
RE Recommendations for tlio Second Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)
Dear Mr Duwart
Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) has reviewed validated analytical data generated from the Hrst round of ground water surface water and sediment sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during April 1989 The purpose of this letter U to briefly discuss the analytical results the significance of the results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the second round of sampling The tables and figures referred to in this letter were provided to you during the progress meeting on September 22 1989 Sampling locations are indicated on Figures 1 2 and 3 Data reviewed included analytical results for Hazardous Substance List (HSL) volatile organic compound analyses (VOCs) HSL semivolatile organic compound analyses HSL pcstiddePCB analyses and HSL inorganic parameter analyses Summaries of the parameters detected in each sample are provided in the previously submitted drafl Tables 1 2 and 8 General diemistary parameters including chloride sulfate nitrate as N nitrite as N alkalinity biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were also analyzed at many locations Ground water from selected wells was also analyzed for total organic carbon (TOO and total and fecal coliform Tables 4 and 5 provided a summaiy of the general diemistry results
As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the second sampling round reported concentrations were compared to available federal or state standards or guidelines and trends or anomalies in data were noted Tle results of this data review and our recommendations for parameters to indude in thc second romd sampling program are sununarized below
BALSAM ENVlftONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
Balsam Prefect 6186830 Septemiber 161989 Page 2
HSL VolatUe Organic Compound Analyses
V0Clt6 were detected in twenty of the thirty-six monitoring wells sampled VOCs were confirmed present only ia on-site monitoring wells and consisted primarUy of chlorinated and aromatic compounds IndudinglTlHdichlagroethane^mdash ~ r dichloroethane 111-trichloroothane trichloroethene tolueacL xylenes and ethylbenzene Methyl-t-butyl-ether (MTBE) was not reportoa present above detection limits in any samples VOCs were reported to be detected at two of the ten surface water sampling locations (S-3 and S-9) boUi located in the lower swaleBrook A area VOCs were reported to be detected at five of the eight sediment sampling locations (S-l S-2 S-S S-9 and S-10)
HSL Semivolatile Organic Compound Analyses
HSL semivolatile organic compounds were reported to be present at low concentrations in ground water samples from four wells located at the base of the former disposal area (M0-2DR 0W-2SR 0W-2DR and CKW-4SRX Low concentrations of bb (2-e(hylhczyl) phthalate were also reported present in samplesfirom six weUs located on site and off site (MW-15S MW-15D MW-12S MW-13S MW-13D and M0-4D) Naphthalene and acenaphthene were reported present in ground water samples fi^m wells MW-15S and M0-4S respectively at low concentrations Bis (2-ethylhci^l) phthalate was the only semivolatile compound reported to be present in two of the ten surface water samples (S-2 and S-5) Three of the eight sediment samples contained semivolatile organic compounds Benzoic add and di-n-butylphuialate were reported to be present in one sediment sample (S-9) and only di-n-butylphthalate was detected In two sediment samples (S-2 and S-4)
HSL PesticidePCB Analyses
PCBs were reported to be present below contract required detection limits (CRDLs) but above instrument detection limits Ooss than 05 ppb) in ground water samples collectedfitgtm Umx wells located at the base of the former drum disposal area and in the dearing north of the swale (0W-2SR 0W-2DR 0W-8R and MW-llD) PCBt were reported to be present in six of tiie ten surface water samples collected Oess than 1 ppb) from the swale Brook A and the Exeter River (S-l S-2 S-5 8-8 S-9 and S-10) One sediment sample (S-10) collected at the base of the piggeiY waste pile was reported to conlak the pesticide 44shyDDE at a concentration less than 15 ppb
HSL Inorganic Parameter Analysoa
Results of HSL inorganic paramcta analyses were compared to state or federal maximum contaminant limits primary or secondary drinking yenrater standards and EPA Ambient Water Quality (Mtcria as appropriate Based upon these comparisons reported concentrations of arsenic iron and manganese in ground water samples exceeded guidelines for at least one parameter bi samples from
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC
r Balsam Project 6186830 September 151989 Page 8
filVeen wells located both on site and off site The only elevated arsenic concentration reported in an off-site sample was from MW-19D Results for surface water samples indicated iron manganese or silver exceeded guidelines ior_at least one parameter atfive j f the ien sampling locatJona It diould be noted that inm and manganese standardsarc aesthetic andjgtot health based ~ guidelines
Results of sediment analyses were compared to a United States Cieological Survey (USOS) reference document (USGS Professional Paper 1270) vHiidt jM^vides average element concentrations in soils for the eastem United States Results rexjorled for the sediment data Indicated above average concentrations of arsenic barium cobalt lead manganese nidcel and xinc at one sediment sampling location locatisd at Ihe tose of the piggery waste jrfle (S-10) However elevated concentrations were not present in data collected at downstream sampling locatiltms Slightly elevated concentrations of some parameters wore also observed at five other sediment sampling locations
General Chomlstiy Parameters
Total and fecal coliform results for ground water were reported below the available guidelines exduding a result f^m one off-site well (MW-16D) Results for sulfate chloride nitrate and nitrite in ground water were all reported at concenlratioas below available state or federal guidelines Aivomalies were not observed in Uie results for TOC analyses Alkalinity results in ground water were reported below state guidelines however relatively higher concentrations of this parameter wore noted in samples com wells whidi also had relatively high reported values of VOCs (0W2SR 0W2DR 0W-4SR 0W-4DR M0-2S and M0-3SR) A similar trend was observed for the results from BOD and COD analyses
PROPOSED AXALYHCAL SUITE
VOCs appear to be the primary contaminants identified in samples collected during the April samplingprogram noting that MTBE was not Identified present in any sanples iWefore VCXS should be included la the second sampling round whidi wiU indude the same monitoring well and surface water sampling loeaUons ss the first sampling round
Tlie semi-volatile organic compounds identified in thc first round were reported a t relatively low concentrations and primarily fi^m samples collected in areas where notable concentrations of V(Xs were also identified Ihe other az^as where semivolatile organic compounds were estimated to be present eudi as samples from well lfW-13 and off-site locations were generallv at concentrations below contract dctectiim limits and are common environmental eontaminants not Ukely to be related to activities at the Mottolo site Therefore BsJsam proposes to collect and analvxe a limited number of samples fitgtm wells where the presence of semivolatile organic compounds firom site activities was indicated
bull ^ - bull [J I I i raquo l I X - bull W i
bull bull t j 3- n j ^ f l bdquo i i w g u Wraquo
i
I
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
r
^
Balsam PntJect 6165830
September 15 1089 Page 4
The results of the pestiddePCB analyses Indicate that trace concentrations of Aroclor 1260 were detected In several surface water and ground water samples a t concentration below 1 ppb Therefore samples will be collected f^ PCB
-analysis fiomJocations where P(2Bs vere previously detected^-as-wdl as J ^ _ limited number of locations where PCBs were not r epor t^ present ~ - ~
l l i e inorganic parameter analytical results indicate elevated concentrations of arsenic Iron and manganese at several monitoring well locations Based upon the review of these data Balsam proposes to include arsenic in the second round analytical suite since this parameter appears to correlate best wlUi areas of on-site contamination and belaquoiuse of relatively low toxidty of iron and manganese
Analytical results for the general chemistrv parameters were generally within accepted limits for naturally occurring media and significant trends or anomalies In these data were not noted Therefore resampling and analyses fbr the general chemisliy parameters would not likely provide significant additional information to thc Mottolo data base or improve site diaracterization efforts
A summary of the proposed second round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attadied Table 1 Several locations whore contaminants were not detected in Uie f^st sampling round will also be resampled for selected parameters to confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We arc scheduled to conduct sampling activities the wedi of Septembor 26 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this woric on schedule Please do not hesitate io contact Eric Wood or either of the undersigned if you have any questions
Sincerely
1 ltcQ Timothy a Stone CPG Bl Prqjeet Manager
Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager
c c J Pdtonen (Stark ft Peltonen) M Robinette (NHDES)
lt90^415
Attachment
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
I TABLE 2
Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire
pB Tenperature and Conductivity Measurements for Split Sanples
Round II Groundwater and Surface Water Sanpling September 27 and 28 1989
saricN NUHBER
STATION LOCATION BH
TTMP
_degc_ CONDUCT UMHOSCM
1 nw-8S 59 8 90 2 MM-13D 58 10 120 3 0W-4SR 6 1 14 360 4 n ^ l 8 D 66 12 208 56 MO-3SRMO-35D 6 3 8 5 220 7 MW-llD 58 15 45 89 S-3S-13 54 7 15
10 S-6 53 6 20 11 S-9 5 5 10 50
pH tenperature and conductivity was not recorded for trip blaiAs and performance evaluations sanples
(8)
bullm W raquo T ^rr
40 Sanple Paperwork and Shipping of Coolers
After collecting a sanple FPC logged the sample in on the diain-of-custody forms and traffic reports Information pertaining to sanpling time and date location preservative traffic number and analyte was recorded on each sample container and tag The bottles were sealed with strapping tape and custody seals Sanples were then placed in coolers and cushioned against breaking using absorbent material Sanples were kept cool using reusable ice packs
Two copies of the traffic reports and a copy of the chain-of-custody forms were sealed in t h e xpper lid of the cooler Two signed custody seals were placed an the coolers which were taped shut with strapping tape Ccpies of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms are provided in Afpendix 4
Sanples were shipped via Federal Express Ttie airbill number for each laboratory is as follows
Aquatec Inc - 4173910241 lEA - 4173910215 Chemtech Consulting Group - 4173910226
50 Ccmclusions
FPC collected all samples as anticipated FPC telefrfioned SMO on September 29 1989 to inform them that all sanples were shipped and that Case 12791 could be closed out
FPC feels that Balsam followed their sanpling and analysis plan vrtien collecting environmental sanples FPC believes that wells were adequately purged prior to sanpling and that purged water was adequately screened with an HNu prior to disposal Water levels and depth of the well were accurately measured to dthin 001 Care was taken by Balsam in not stirring up sediment prior to sanpling surface water
At 350 pm on September 29 1989 Nike Kulbersh received a call from Cindy Schreyer of SNQ Ms Schreyer informed Mr Kulbersh that the traffic n a a t e t B for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs would have to be renumbered and that a revised organic traffic report would have to be resubmitted to lEA and SMO The reason for revising the traffic report is that there nust be two distinctly different traffic report numbers for each laboratory FPC conplied with SNQ and sent a revised organic traffic report to lEA
Finally FPC was informed by Balsam that they were using Aquatech laboratories to analyze their sanples FPC requests that prior to the third round of groundwater ar^ surface water sanpling Balsam inform EPA as to gt^t laboratory (ies) they are planning to use so that FPC doesnt send their sanples to the same labs
(9)
h ^ ^ ^ I bull - - v - y y bull- bull bullbullbull-bull bull ^^^-~-V--V bullbullbullbullbull - bull bullbull^^^^^^v^^y^-^vgt shy
APPENDIX 1
Letter from Balsam to EPA September 15 1989
I bull|UillPMJLf
I rbullyyyyyli^^-ybull w^mrnr^^shy
I I I I I I t I 1
4BALSAM ErwennQ btvinrantrtti Scire amp M u i M Hygim
MfiliiaiRMtf 8laquollaquomNH8Q79
September 15 1989 Balsam Project 618G830
Mr R(tfer Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-GAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agen^ Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massadhufietts 02203
RE Recommendations for tlio Second Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)
Dear Mr Duwart
Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) has reviewed validated analytical data generated from the Hrst round of ground water surface water and sediment sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during April 1989 The purpose of this letter U to briefly discuss the analytical results the significance of the results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the second round of sampling The tables and figures referred to in this letter were provided to you during the progress meeting on September 22 1989 Sampling locations are indicated on Figures 1 2 and 3 Data reviewed included analytical results for Hazardous Substance List (HSL) volatile organic compound analyses (VOCs) HSL semivolatile organic compound analyses HSL pcstiddePCB analyses and HSL inorganic parameter analyses Summaries of the parameters detected in each sample are provided in the previously submitted drafl Tables 1 2 and 8 General diemistary parameters including chloride sulfate nitrate as N nitrite as N alkalinity biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were also analyzed at many locations Ground water from selected wells was also analyzed for total organic carbon (TOO and total and fecal coliform Tables 4 and 5 provided a summaiy of the general diemistry results
As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the second sampling round reported concentrations were compared to available federal or state standards or guidelines and trends or anomalies in data were noted Tle results of this data review and our recommendations for parameters to indude in thc second romd sampling program are sununarized below
BALSAM ENVlftONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
Balsam Prefect 6186830 Septemiber 161989 Page 2
HSL VolatUe Organic Compound Analyses
V0Clt6 were detected in twenty of the thirty-six monitoring wells sampled VOCs were confirmed present only ia on-site monitoring wells and consisted primarUy of chlorinated and aromatic compounds IndudinglTlHdichlagroethane^mdash ~ r dichloroethane 111-trichloroothane trichloroethene tolueacL xylenes and ethylbenzene Methyl-t-butyl-ether (MTBE) was not reportoa present above detection limits in any samples VOCs were reported to be detected at two of the ten surface water sampling locations (S-3 and S-9) boUi located in the lower swaleBrook A area VOCs were reported to be detected at five of the eight sediment sampling locations (S-l S-2 S-S S-9 and S-10)
HSL Semivolatile Organic Compound Analyses
HSL semivolatile organic compounds were reported to be present at low concentrations in ground water samples from four wells located at the base of the former disposal area (M0-2DR 0W-2SR 0W-2DR and CKW-4SRX Low concentrations of bb (2-e(hylhczyl) phthalate were also reported present in samplesfirom six weUs located on site and off site (MW-15S MW-15D MW-12S MW-13S MW-13D and M0-4D) Naphthalene and acenaphthene were reported present in ground water samples fi^m wells MW-15S and M0-4S respectively at low concentrations Bis (2-ethylhci^l) phthalate was the only semivolatile compound reported to be present in two of the ten surface water samples (S-2 and S-5) Three of the eight sediment samples contained semivolatile organic compounds Benzoic add and di-n-butylphuialate were reported to be present in one sediment sample (S-9) and only di-n-butylphthalate was detected In two sediment samples (S-2 and S-4)
HSL PesticidePCB Analyses
PCBs were reported to be present below contract required detection limits (CRDLs) but above instrument detection limits Ooss than 05 ppb) in ground water samples collectedfitgtm Umx wells located at the base of the former drum disposal area and in the dearing north of the swale (0W-2SR 0W-2DR 0W-8R and MW-llD) PCBt were reported to be present in six of tiie ten surface water samples collected Oess than 1 ppb) from the swale Brook A and the Exeter River (S-l S-2 S-5 8-8 S-9 and S-10) One sediment sample (S-10) collected at the base of the piggeiY waste pile was reported to conlak the pesticide 44shyDDE at a concentration less than 15 ppb
HSL Inorganic Parameter Analysoa
Results of HSL inorganic paramcta analyses were compared to state or federal maximum contaminant limits primary or secondary drinking yenrater standards and EPA Ambient Water Quality (Mtcria as appropriate Based upon these comparisons reported concentrations of arsenic iron and manganese in ground water samples exceeded guidelines for at least one parameter bi samples from
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC
r Balsam Project 6186830 September 151989 Page 8
filVeen wells located both on site and off site The only elevated arsenic concentration reported in an off-site sample was from MW-19D Results for surface water samples indicated iron manganese or silver exceeded guidelines ior_at least one parameter atfive j f the ien sampling locatJona It diould be noted that inm and manganese standardsarc aesthetic andjgtot health based ~ guidelines
Results of sediment analyses were compared to a United States Cieological Survey (USOS) reference document (USGS Professional Paper 1270) vHiidt jM^vides average element concentrations in soils for the eastem United States Results rexjorled for the sediment data Indicated above average concentrations of arsenic barium cobalt lead manganese nidcel and xinc at one sediment sampling location locatisd at Ihe tose of the piggery waste jrfle (S-10) However elevated concentrations were not present in data collected at downstream sampling locatiltms Slightly elevated concentrations of some parameters wore also observed at five other sediment sampling locations
General Chomlstiy Parameters
Total and fecal coliform results for ground water were reported below the available guidelines exduding a result f^m one off-site well (MW-16D) Results for sulfate chloride nitrate and nitrite in ground water were all reported at concenlratioas below available state or federal guidelines Aivomalies were not observed in Uie results for TOC analyses Alkalinity results in ground water were reported below state guidelines however relatively higher concentrations of this parameter wore noted in samples com wells whidi also had relatively high reported values of VOCs (0W2SR 0W2DR 0W-4SR 0W-4DR M0-2S and M0-3SR) A similar trend was observed for the results from BOD and COD analyses
PROPOSED AXALYHCAL SUITE
VOCs appear to be the primary contaminants identified in samples collected during the April samplingprogram noting that MTBE was not Identified present in any sanples iWefore VCXS should be included la the second sampling round whidi wiU indude the same monitoring well and surface water sampling loeaUons ss the first sampling round
Tlie semi-volatile organic compounds identified in thc first round were reported a t relatively low concentrations and primarily fi^m samples collected in areas where notable concentrations of V(Xs were also identified Ihe other az^as where semivolatile organic compounds were estimated to be present eudi as samples from well lfW-13 and off-site locations were generallv at concentrations below contract dctectiim limits and are common environmental eontaminants not Ukely to be related to activities at the Mottolo site Therefore BsJsam proposes to collect and analvxe a limited number of samples fitgtm wells where the presence of semivolatile organic compounds firom site activities was indicated
bull ^ - bull [J I I i raquo l I X - bull W i
bull bull t j 3- n j ^ f l bdquo i i w g u Wraquo
i
I
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
r
^
Balsam PntJect 6165830
September 15 1089 Page 4
The results of the pestiddePCB analyses Indicate that trace concentrations of Aroclor 1260 were detected In several surface water and ground water samples a t concentration below 1 ppb Therefore samples will be collected f^ PCB
-analysis fiomJocations where P(2Bs vere previously detected^-as-wdl as J ^ _ limited number of locations where PCBs were not r epor t^ present ~ - ~
l l i e inorganic parameter analytical results indicate elevated concentrations of arsenic Iron and manganese at several monitoring well locations Based upon the review of these data Balsam proposes to include arsenic in the second round analytical suite since this parameter appears to correlate best wlUi areas of on-site contamination and belaquoiuse of relatively low toxidty of iron and manganese
Analytical results for the general chemistrv parameters were generally within accepted limits for naturally occurring media and significant trends or anomalies In these data were not noted Therefore resampling and analyses fbr the general chemisliy parameters would not likely provide significant additional information to thc Mottolo data base or improve site diaracterization efforts
A summary of the proposed second round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attadied Table 1 Several locations whore contaminants were not detected in Uie f^st sampling round will also be resampled for selected parameters to confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We arc scheduled to conduct sampling activities the wedi of Septembor 26 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this woric on schedule Please do not hesitate io contact Eric Wood or either of the undersigned if you have any questions
Sincerely
1 ltcQ Timothy a Stone CPG Bl Prqjeet Manager
Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager
c c J Pdtonen (Stark ft Peltonen) M Robinette (NHDES)
lt90^415
Attachment
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
40 Sanple Paperwork and Shipping of Coolers
After collecting a sanple FPC logged the sample in on the diain-of-custody forms and traffic reports Information pertaining to sanpling time and date location preservative traffic number and analyte was recorded on each sample container and tag The bottles were sealed with strapping tape and custody seals Sanples were then placed in coolers and cushioned against breaking using absorbent material Sanples were kept cool using reusable ice packs
Two copies of the traffic reports and a copy of the chain-of-custody forms were sealed in t h e xpper lid of the cooler Two signed custody seals were placed an the coolers which were taped shut with strapping tape Ccpies of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms are provided in Afpendix 4
Sanples were shipped via Federal Express Ttie airbill number for each laboratory is as follows
Aquatec Inc - 4173910241 lEA - 4173910215 Chemtech Consulting Group - 4173910226
50 Ccmclusions
FPC collected all samples as anticipated FPC telefrfioned SMO on September 29 1989 to inform them that all sanples were shipped and that Case 12791 could be closed out
FPC feels that Balsam followed their sanpling and analysis plan vrtien collecting environmental sanples FPC believes that wells were adequately purged prior to sanpling and that purged water was adequately screened with an HNu prior to disposal Water levels and depth of the well were accurately measured to dthin 001 Care was taken by Balsam in not stirring up sediment prior to sanpling surface water
At 350 pm on September 29 1989 Nike Kulbersh received a call from Cindy Schreyer of SNQ Ms Schreyer informed Mr Kulbersh that the traffic n a a t e t B for BNAs and PesticidesPCBs would have to be renumbered and that a revised organic traffic report would have to be resubmitted to lEA and SMO The reason for revising the traffic report is that there nust be two distinctly different traffic report numbers for each laboratory FPC conplied with SNQ and sent a revised organic traffic report to lEA
Finally FPC was informed by Balsam that they were using Aquatech laboratories to analyze their sanples FPC requests that prior to the third round of groundwater ar^ surface water sanpling Balsam inform EPA as to gt^t laboratory (ies) they are planning to use so that FPC doesnt send their sanples to the same labs
(9)
h ^ ^ ^ I bull - - v - y y bull- bull bullbullbull-bull bull ^^^-~-V--V bullbullbullbullbull - bull bullbull^^^^^^v^^y^-^vgt shy
APPENDIX 1
Letter from Balsam to EPA September 15 1989
I bull|UillPMJLf
I rbullyyyyyli^^-ybull w^mrnr^^shy
I I I I I I t I 1
4BALSAM ErwennQ btvinrantrtti Scire amp M u i M Hygim
MfiliiaiRMtf 8laquollaquomNH8Q79
September 15 1989 Balsam Project 618G830
Mr R(tfer Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-GAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agen^ Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massadhufietts 02203
RE Recommendations for tlio Second Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)
Dear Mr Duwart
Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) has reviewed validated analytical data generated from the Hrst round of ground water surface water and sediment sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during April 1989 The purpose of this letter U to briefly discuss the analytical results the significance of the results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the second round of sampling The tables and figures referred to in this letter were provided to you during the progress meeting on September 22 1989 Sampling locations are indicated on Figures 1 2 and 3 Data reviewed included analytical results for Hazardous Substance List (HSL) volatile organic compound analyses (VOCs) HSL semivolatile organic compound analyses HSL pcstiddePCB analyses and HSL inorganic parameter analyses Summaries of the parameters detected in each sample are provided in the previously submitted drafl Tables 1 2 and 8 General diemistary parameters including chloride sulfate nitrate as N nitrite as N alkalinity biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were also analyzed at many locations Ground water from selected wells was also analyzed for total organic carbon (TOO and total and fecal coliform Tables 4 and 5 provided a summaiy of the general diemistry results
As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the second sampling round reported concentrations were compared to available federal or state standards or guidelines and trends or anomalies in data were noted Tle results of this data review and our recommendations for parameters to indude in thc second romd sampling program are sununarized below
BALSAM ENVlftONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
Balsam Prefect 6186830 Septemiber 161989 Page 2
HSL VolatUe Organic Compound Analyses
V0Clt6 were detected in twenty of the thirty-six monitoring wells sampled VOCs were confirmed present only ia on-site monitoring wells and consisted primarUy of chlorinated and aromatic compounds IndudinglTlHdichlagroethane^mdash ~ r dichloroethane 111-trichloroothane trichloroethene tolueacL xylenes and ethylbenzene Methyl-t-butyl-ether (MTBE) was not reportoa present above detection limits in any samples VOCs were reported to be detected at two of the ten surface water sampling locations (S-3 and S-9) boUi located in the lower swaleBrook A area VOCs were reported to be detected at five of the eight sediment sampling locations (S-l S-2 S-S S-9 and S-10)
HSL Semivolatile Organic Compound Analyses
HSL semivolatile organic compounds were reported to be present at low concentrations in ground water samples from four wells located at the base of the former disposal area (M0-2DR 0W-2SR 0W-2DR and CKW-4SRX Low concentrations of bb (2-e(hylhczyl) phthalate were also reported present in samplesfirom six weUs located on site and off site (MW-15S MW-15D MW-12S MW-13S MW-13D and M0-4D) Naphthalene and acenaphthene were reported present in ground water samples fi^m wells MW-15S and M0-4S respectively at low concentrations Bis (2-ethylhci^l) phthalate was the only semivolatile compound reported to be present in two of the ten surface water samples (S-2 and S-5) Three of the eight sediment samples contained semivolatile organic compounds Benzoic add and di-n-butylphuialate were reported to be present in one sediment sample (S-9) and only di-n-butylphthalate was detected In two sediment samples (S-2 and S-4)
HSL PesticidePCB Analyses
PCBs were reported to be present below contract required detection limits (CRDLs) but above instrument detection limits Ooss than 05 ppb) in ground water samples collectedfitgtm Umx wells located at the base of the former drum disposal area and in the dearing north of the swale (0W-2SR 0W-2DR 0W-8R and MW-llD) PCBt were reported to be present in six of tiie ten surface water samples collected Oess than 1 ppb) from the swale Brook A and the Exeter River (S-l S-2 S-5 8-8 S-9 and S-10) One sediment sample (S-10) collected at the base of the piggeiY waste pile was reported to conlak the pesticide 44shyDDE at a concentration less than 15 ppb
HSL Inorganic Parameter Analysoa
Results of HSL inorganic paramcta analyses were compared to state or federal maximum contaminant limits primary or secondary drinking yenrater standards and EPA Ambient Water Quality (Mtcria as appropriate Based upon these comparisons reported concentrations of arsenic iron and manganese in ground water samples exceeded guidelines for at least one parameter bi samples from
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC
r Balsam Project 6186830 September 151989 Page 8
filVeen wells located both on site and off site The only elevated arsenic concentration reported in an off-site sample was from MW-19D Results for surface water samples indicated iron manganese or silver exceeded guidelines ior_at least one parameter atfive j f the ien sampling locatJona It diould be noted that inm and manganese standardsarc aesthetic andjgtot health based ~ guidelines
Results of sediment analyses were compared to a United States Cieological Survey (USOS) reference document (USGS Professional Paper 1270) vHiidt jM^vides average element concentrations in soils for the eastem United States Results rexjorled for the sediment data Indicated above average concentrations of arsenic barium cobalt lead manganese nidcel and xinc at one sediment sampling location locatisd at Ihe tose of the piggery waste jrfle (S-10) However elevated concentrations were not present in data collected at downstream sampling locatiltms Slightly elevated concentrations of some parameters wore also observed at five other sediment sampling locations
General Chomlstiy Parameters
Total and fecal coliform results for ground water were reported below the available guidelines exduding a result f^m one off-site well (MW-16D) Results for sulfate chloride nitrate and nitrite in ground water were all reported at concenlratioas below available state or federal guidelines Aivomalies were not observed in Uie results for TOC analyses Alkalinity results in ground water were reported below state guidelines however relatively higher concentrations of this parameter wore noted in samples com wells whidi also had relatively high reported values of VOCs (0W2SR 0W2DR 0W-4SR 0W-4DR M0-2S and M0-3SR) A similar trend was observed for the results from BOD and COD analyses
PROPOSED AXALYHCAL SUITE
VOCs appear to be the primary contaminants identified in samples collected during the April samplingprogram noting that MTBE was not Identified present in any sanples iWefore VCXS should be included la the second sampling round whidi wiU indude the same monitoring well and surface water sampling loeaUons ss the first sampling round
Tlie semi-volatile organic compounds identified in thc first round were reported a t relatively low concentrations and primarily fi^m samples collected in areas where notable concentrations of V(Xs were also identified Ihe other az^as where semivolatile organic compounds were estimated to be present eudi as samples from well lfW-13 and off-site locations were generallv at concentrations below contract dctectiim limits and are common environmental eontaminants not Ukely to be related to activities at the Mottolo site Therefore BsJsam proposes to collect and analvxe a limited number of samples fitgtm wells where the presence of semivolatile organic compounds firom site activities was indicated
bull ^ - bull [J I I i raquo l I X - bull W i
bull bull t j 3- n j ^ f l bdquo i i w g u Wraquo
i
I
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
r
^
Balsam PntJect 6165830
September 15 1089 Page 4
The results of the pestiddePCB analyses Indicate that trace concentrations of Aroclor 1260 were detected In several surface water and ground water samples a t concentration below 1 ppb Therefore samples will be collected f^ PCB
-analysis fiomJocations where P(2Bs vere previously detected^-as-wdl as J ^ _ limited number of locations where PCBs were not r epor t^ present ~ - ~
l l i e inorganic parameter analytical results indicate elevated concentrations of arsenic Iron and manganese at several monitoring well locations Based upon the review of these data Balsam proposes to include arsenic in the second round analytical suite since this parameter appears to correlate best wlUi areas of on-site contamination and belaquoiuse of relatively low toxidty of iron and manganese
Analytical results for the general chemistrv parameters were generally within accepted limits for naturally occurring media and significant trends or anomalies In these data were not noted Therefore resampling and analyses fbr the general chemisliy parameters would not likely provide significant additional information to thc Mottolo data base or improve site diaracterization efforts
A summary of the proposed second round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attadied Table 1 Several locations whore contaminants were not detected in Uie f^st sampling round will also be resampled for selected parameters to confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We arc scheduled to conduct sampling activities the wedi of Septembor 26 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this woric on schedule Please do not hesitate io contact Eric Wood or either of the undersigned if you have any questions
Sincerely
1 ltcQ Timothy a Stone CPG Bl Prqjeet Manager
Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager
c c J Pdtonen (Stark ft Peltonen) M Robinette (NHDES)
lt90^415
Attachment
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
APPENDIX 1
Letter from Balsam to EPA September 15 1989
I bull|UillPMJLf
I rbullyyyyyli^^-ybull w^mrnr^^shy
I I I I I I t I 1
4BALSAM ErwennQ btvinrantrtti Scire amp M u i M Hygim
MfiliiaiRMtf 8laquollaquomNH8Q79
September 15 1989 Balsam Project 618G830
Mr R(tfer Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-GAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agen^ Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massadhufietts 02203
RE Recommendations for tlio Second Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)
Dear Mr Duwart
Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) has reviewed validated analytical data generated from the Hrst round of ground water surface water and sediment sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during April 1989 The purpose of this letter U to briefly discuss the analytical results the significance of the results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the second round of sampling The tables and figures referred to in this letter were provided to you during the progress meeting on September 22 1989 Sampling locations are indicated on Figures 1 2 and 3 Data reviewed included analytical results for Hazardous Substance List (HSL) volatile organic compound analyses (VOCs) HSL semivolatile organic compound analyses HSL pcstiddePCB analyses and HSL inorganic parameter analyses Summaries of the parameters detected in each sample are provided in the previously submitted drafl Tables 1 2 and 8 General diemistary parameters including chloride sulfate nitrate as N nitrite as N alkalinity biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were also analyzed at many locations Ground water from selected wells was also analyzed for total organic carbon (TOO and total and fecal coliform Tables 4 and 5 provided a summaiy of the general diemistry results
As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the second sampling round reported concentrations were compared to available federal or state standards or guidelines and trends or anomalies in data were noted Tle results of this data review and our recommendations for parameters to indude in thc second romd sampling program are sununarized below
BALSAM ENVlftONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
Balsam Prefect 6186830 Septemiber 161989 Page 2
HSL VolatUe Organic Compound Analyses
V0Clt6 were detected in twenty of the thirty-six monitoring wells sampled VOCs were confirmed present only ia on-site monitoring wells and consisted primarUy of chlorinated and aromatic compounds IndudinglTlHdichlagroethane^mdash ~ r dichloroethane 111-trichloroothane trichloroethene tolueacL xylenes and ethylbenzene Methyl-t-butyl-ether (MTBE) was not reportoa present above detection limits in any samples VOCs were reported to be detected at two of the ten surface water sampling locations (S-3 and S-9) boUi located in the lower swaleBrook A area VOCs were reported to be detected at five of the eight sediment sampling locations (S-l S-2 S-S S-9 and S-10)
HSL Semivolatile Organic Compound Analyses
HSL semivolatile organic compounds were reported to be present at low concentrations in ground water samples from four wells located at the base of the former disposal area (M0-2DR 0W-2SR 0W-2DR and CKW-4SRX Low concentrations of bb (2-e(hylhczyl) phthalate were also reported present in samplesfirom six weUs located on site and off site (MW-15S MW-15D MW-12S MW-13S MW-13D and M0-4D) Naphthalene and acenaphthene were reported present in ground water samples fi^m wells MW-15S and M0-4S respectively at low concentrations Bis (2-ethylhci^l) phthalate was the only semivolatile compound reported to be present in two of the ten surface water samples (S-2 and S-5) Three of the eight sediment samples contained semivolatile organic compounds Benzoic add and di-n-butylphuialate were reported to be present in one sediment sample (S-9) and only di-n-butylphthalate was detected In two sediment samples (S-2 and S-4)
HSL PesticidePCB Analyses
PCBs were reported to be present below contract required detection limits (CRDLs) but above instrument detection limits Ooss than 05 ppb) in ground water samples collectedfitgtm Umx wells located at the base of the former drum disposal area and in the dearing north of the swale (0W-2SR 0W-2DR 0W-8R and MW-llD) PCBt were reported to be present in six of tiie ten surface water samples collected Oess than 1 ppb) from the swale Brook A and the Exeter River (S-l S-2 S-5 8-8 S-9 and S-10) One sediment sample (S-10) collected at the base of the piggeiY waste pile was reported to conlak the pesticide 44shyDDE at a concentration less than 15 ppb
HSL Inorganic Parameter Analysoa
Results of HSL inorganic paramcta analyses were compared to state or federal maximum contaminant limits primary or secondary drinking yenrater standards and EPA Ambient Water Quality (Mtcria as appropriate Based upon these comparisons reported concentrations of arsenic iron and manganese in ground water samples exceeded guidelines for at least one parameter bi samples from
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC
r Balsam Project 6186830 September 151989 Page 8
filVeen wells located both on site and off site The only elevated arsenic concentration reported in an off-site sample was from MW-19D Results for surface water samples indicated iron manganese or silver exceeded guidelines ior_at least one parameter atfive j f the ien sampling locatJona It diould be noted that inm and manganese standardsarc aesthetic andjgtot health based ~ guidelines
Results of sediment analyses were compared to a United States Cieological Survey (USOS) reference document (USGS Professional Paper 1270) vHiidt jM^vides average element concentrations in soils for the eastem United States Results rexjorled for the sediment data Indicated above average concentrations of arsenic barium cobalt lead manganese nidcel and xinc at one sediment sampling location locatisd at Ihe tose of the piggery waste jrfle (S-10) However elevated concentrations were not present in data collected at downstream sampling locatiltms Slightly elevated concentrations of some parameters wore also observed at five other sediment sampling locations
General Chomlstiy Parameters
Total and fecal coliform results for ground water were reported below the available guidelines exduding a result f^m one off-site well (MW-16D) Results for sulfate chloride nitrate and nitrite in ground water were all reported at concenlratioas below available state or federal guidelines Aivomalies were not observed in Uie results for TOC analyses Alkalinity results in ground water were reported below state guidelines however relatively higher concentrations of this parameter wore noted in samples com wells whidi also had relatively high reported values of VOCs (0W2SR 0W2DR 0W-4SR 0W-4DR M0-2S and M0-3SR) A similar trend was observed for the results from BOD and COD analyses
PROPOSED AXALYHCAL SUITE
VOCs appear to be the primary contaminants identified in samples collected during the April samplingprogram noting that MTBE was not Identified present in any sanples iWefore VCXS should be included la the second sampling round whidi wiU indude the same monitoring well and surface water sampling loeaUons ss the first sampling round
Tlie semi-volatile organic compounds identified in thc first round were reported a t relatively low concentrations and primarily fi^m samples collected in areas where notable concentrations of V(Xs were also identified Ihe other az^as where semivolatile organic compounds were estimated to be present eudi as samples from well lfW-13 and off-site locations were generallv at concentrations below contract dctectiim limits and are common environmental eontaminants not Ukely to be related to activities at the Mottolo site Therefore BsJsam proposes to collect and analvxe a limited number of samples fitgtm wells where the presence of semivolatile organic compounds firom site activities was indicated
bull ^ - bull [J I I i raquo l I X - bull W i
bull bull t j 3- n j ^ f l bdquo i i w g u Wraquo
i
I
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
r
^
Balsam PntJect 6165830
September 15 1089 Page 4
The results of the pestiddePCB analyses Indicate that trace concentrations of Aroclor 1260 were detected In several surface water and ground water samples a t concentration below 1 ppb Therefore samples will be collected f^ PCB
-analysis fiomJocations where P(2Bs vere previously detected^-as-wdl as J ^ _ limited number of locations where PCBs were not r epor t^ present ~ - ~
l l i e inorganic parameter analytical results indicate elevated concentrations of arsenic Iron and manganese at several monitoring well locations Based upon the review of these data Balsam proposes to include arsenic in the second round analytical suite since this parameter appears to correlate best wlUi areas of on-site contamination and belaquoiuse of relatively low toxidty of iron and manganese
Analytical results for the general chemistrv parameters were generally within accepted limits for naturally occurring media and significant trends or anomalies In these data were not noted Therefore resampling and analyses fbr the general chemisliy parameters would not likely provide significant additional information to thc Mottolo data base or improve site diaracterization efforts
A summary of the proposed second round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attadied Table 1 Several locations whore contaminants were not detected in Uie f^st sampling round will also be resampled for selected parameters to confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We arc scheduled to conduct sampling activities the wedi of Septembor 26 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this woric on schedule Please do not hesitate io contact Eric Wood or either of the undersigned if you have any questions
Sincerely
1 ltcQ Timothy a Stone CPG Bl Prqjeet Manager
Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager
c c J Pdtonen (Stark ft Peltonen) M Robinette (NHDES)
lt90^415
Attachment
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
I I I I I I t I 1
4BALSAM ErwennQ btvinrantrtti Scire amp M u i M Hygim
MfiliiaiRMtf 8laquollaquomNH8Q79
September 15 1989 Balsam Project 618G830
Mr R(tfer Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-GAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agen^ Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massadhufietts 02203
RE Recommendations for tlio Second Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)
Dear Mr Duwart
Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) has reviewed validated analytical data generated from the Hrst round of ground water surface water and sediment sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during April 1989 The purpose of this letter U to briefly discuss the analytical results the significance of the results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the second round of sampling The tables and figures referred to in this letter were provided to you during the progress meeting on September 22 1989 Sampling locations are indicated on Figures 1 2 and 3 Data reviewed included analytical results for Hazardous Substance List (HSL) volatile organic compound analyses (VOCs) HSL semivolatile organic compound analyses HSL pcstiddePCB analyses and HSL inorganic parameter analyses Summaries of the parameters detected in each sample are provided in the previously submitted drafl Tables 1 2 and 8 General diemistary parameters including chloride sulfate nitrate as N nitrite as N alkalinity biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were also analyzed at many locations Ground water from selected wells was also analyzed for total organic carbon (TOO and total and fecal coliform Tables 4 and 5 provided a summaiy of the general diemistry results
As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the second sampling round reported concentrations were compared to available federal or state standards or guidelines and trends or anomalies in data were noted Tle results of this data review and our recommendations for parameters to indude in thc second romd sampling program are sununarized below
BALSAM ENVlftONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
Balsam Prefect 6186830 Septemiber 161989 Page 2
HSL VolatUe Organic Compound Analyses
V0Clt6 were detected in twenty of the thirty-six monitoring wells sampled VOCs were confirmed present only ia on-site monitoring wells and consisted primarUy of chlorinated and aromatic compounds IndudinglTlHdichlagroethane^mdash ~ r dichloroethane 111-trichloroothane trichloroethene tolueacL xylenes and ethylbenzene Methyl-t-butyl-ether (MTBE) was not reportoa present above detection limits in any samples VOCs were reported to be detected at two of the ten surface water sampling locations (S-3 and S-9) boUi located in the lower swaleBrook A area VOCs were reported to be detected at five of the eight sediment sampling locations (S-l S-2 S-S S-9 and S-10)
HSL Semivolatile Organic Compound Analyses
HSL semivolatile organic compounds were reported to be present at low concentrations in ground water samples from four wells located at the base of the former disposal area (M0-2DR 0W-2SR 0W-2DR and CKW-4SRX Low concentrations of bb (2-e(hylhczyl) phthalate were also reported present in samplesfirom six weUs located on site and off site (MW-15S MW-15D MW-12S MW-13S MW-13D and M0-4D) Naphthalene and acenaphthene were reported present in ground water samples fi^m wells MW-15S and M0-4S respectively at low concentrations Bis (2-ethylhci^l) phthalate was the only semivolatile compound reported to be present in two of the ten surface water samples (S-2 and S-5) Three of the eight sediment samples contained semivolatile organic compounds Benzoic add and di-n-butylphuialate were reported to be present in one sediment sample (S-9) and only di-n-butylphthalate was detected In two sediment samples (S-2 and S-4)
HSL PesticidePCB Analyses
PCBs were reported to be present below contract required detection limits (CRDLs) but above instrument detection limits Ooss than 05 ppb) in ground water samples collectedfitgtm Umx wells located at the base of the former drum disposal area and in the dearing north of the swale (0W-2SR 0W-2DR 0W-8R and MW-llD) PCBt were reported to be present in six of tiie ten surface water samples collected Oess than 1 ppb) from the swale Brook A and the Exeter River (S-l S-2 S-5 8-8 S-9 and S-10) One sediment sample (S-10) collected at the base of the piggeiY waste pile was reported to conlak the pesticide 44shyDDE at a concentration less than 15 ppb
HSL Inorganic Parameter Analysoa
Results of HSL inorganic paramcta analyses were compared to state or federal maximum contaminant limits primary or secondary drinking yenrater standards and EPA Ambient Water Quality (Mtcria as appropriate Based upon these comparisons reported concentrations of arsenic iron and manganese in ground water samples exceeded guidelines for at least one parameter bi samples from
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC
r Balsam Project 6186830 September 151989 Page 8
filVeen wells located both on site and off site The only elevated arsenic concentration reported in an off-site sample was from MW-19D Results for surface water samples indicated iron manganese or silver exceeded guidelines ior_at least one parameter atfive j f the ien sampling locatJona It diould be noted that inm and manganese standardsarc aesthetic andjgtot health based ~ guidelines
Results of sediment analyses were compared to a United States Cieological Survey (USOS) reference document (USGS Professional Paper 1270) vHiidt jM^vides average element concentrations in soils for the eastem United States Results rexjorled for the sediment data Indicated above average concentrations of arsenic barium cobalt lead manganese nidcel and xinc at one sediment sampling location locatisd at Ihe tose of the piggery waste jrfle (S-10) However elevated concentrations were not present in data collected at downstream sampling locatiltms Slightly elevated concentrations of some parameters wore also observed at five other sediment sampling locations
General Chomlstiy Parameters
Total and fecal coliform results for ground water were reported below the available guidelines exduding a result f^m one off-site well (MW-16D) Results for sulfate chloride nitrate and nitrite in ground water were all reported at concenlratioas below available state or federal guidelines Aivomalies were not observed in Uie results for TOC analyses Alkalinity results in ground water were reported below state guidelines however relatively higher concentrations of this parameter wore noted in samples com wells whidi also had relatively high reported values of VOCs (0W2SR 0W2DR 0W-4SR 0W-4DR M0-2S and M0-3SR) A similar trend was observed for the results from BOD and COD analyses
PROPOSED AXALYHCAL SUITE
VOCs appear to be the primary contaminants identified in samples collected during the April samplingprogram noting that MTBE was not Identified present in any sanples iWefore VCXS should be included la the second sampling round whidi wiU indude the same monitoring well and surface water sampling loeaUons ss the first sampling round
Tlie semi-volatile organic compounds identified in thc first round were reported a t relatively low concentrations and primarily fi^m samples collected in areas where notable concentrations of V(Xs were also identified Ihe other az^as where semivolatile organic compounds were estimated to be present eudi as samples from well lfW-13 and off-site locations were generallv at concentrations below contract dctectiim limits and are common environmental eontaminants not Ukely to be related to activities at the Mottolo site Therefore BsJsam proposes to collect and analvxe a limited number of samples fitgtm wells where the presence of semivolatile organic compounds firom site activities was indicated
bull ^ - bull [J I I i raquo l I X - bull W i
bull bull t j 3- n j ^ f l bdquo i i w g u Wraquo
i
I
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
r
^
Balsam PntJect 6165830
September 15 1089 Page 4
The results of the pestiddePCB analyses Indicate that trace concentrations of Aroclor 1260 were detected In several surface water and ground water samples a t concentration below 1 ppb Therefore samples will be collected f^ PCB
-analysis fiomJocations where P(2Bs vere previously detected^-as-wdl as J ^ _ limited number of locations where PCBs were not r epor t^ present ~ - ~
l l i e inorganic parameter analytical results indicate elevated concentrations of arsenic Iron and manganese at several monitoring well locations Based upon the review of these data Balsam proposes to include arsenic in the second round analytical suite since this parameter appears to correlate best wlUi areas of on-site contamination and belaquoiuse of relatively low toxidty of iron and manganese
Analytical results for the general chemistrv parameters were generally within accepted limits for naturally occurring media and significant trends or anomalies In these data were not noted Therefore resampling and analyses fbr the general chemisliy parameters would not likely provide significant additional information to thc Mottolo data base or improve site diaracterization efforts
A summary of the proposed second round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attadied Table 1 Several locations whore contaminants were not detected in Uie f^st sampling round will also be resampled for selected parameters to confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We arc scheduled to conduct sampling activities the wedi of Septembor 26 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this woric on schedule Please do not hesitate io contact Eric Wood or either of the undersigned if you have any questions
Sincerely
1 ltcQ Timothy a Stone CPG Bl Prqjeet Manager
Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager
c c J Pdtonen (Stark ft Peltonen) M Robinette (NHDES)
lt90^415
Attachment
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
BALSAM ENVlftONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
Balsam Prefect 6186830 Septemiber 161989 Page 2
HSL VolatUe Organic Compound Analyses
V0Clt6 were detected in twenty of the thirty-six monitoring wells sampled VOCs were confirmed present only ia on-site monitoring wells and consisted primarUy of chlorinated and aromatic compounds IndudinglTlHdichlagroethane^mdash ~ r dichloroethane 111-trichloroothane trichloroethene tolueacL xylenes and ethylbenzene Methyl-t-butyl-ether (MTBE) was not reportoa present above detection limits in any samples VOCs were reported to be detected at two of the ten surface water sampling locations (S-3 and S-9) boUi located in the lower swaleBrook A area VOCs were reported to be detected at five of the eight sediment sampling locations (S-l S-2 S-S S-9 and S-10)
HSL Semivolatile Organic Compound Analyses
HSL semivolatile organic compounds were reported to be present at low concentrations in ground water samples from four wells located at the base of the former disposal area (M0-2DR 0W-2SR 0W-2DR and CKW-4SRX Low concentrations of bb (2-e(hylhczyl) phthalate were also reported present in samplesfirom six weUs located on site and off site (MW-15S MW-15D MW-12S MW-13S MW-13D and M0-4D) Naphthalene and acenaphthene were reported present in ground water samples fi^m wells MW-15S and M0-4S respectively at low concentrations Bis (2-ethylhci^l) phthalate was the only semivolatile compound reported to be present in two of the ten surface water samples (S-2 and S-5) Three of the eight sediment samples contained semivolatile organic compounds Benzoic add and di-n-butylphuialate were reported to be present in one sediment sample (S-9) and only di-n-butylphthalate was detected In two sediment samples (S-2 and S-4)
HSL PesticidePCB Analyses
PCBs were reported to be present below contract required detection limits (CRDLs) but above instrument detection limits Ooss than 05 ppb) in ground water samples collectedfitgtm Umx wells located at the base of the former drum disposal area and in the dearing north of the swale (0W-2SR 0W-2DR 0W-8R and MW-llD) PCBt were reported to be present in six of tiie ten surface water samples collected Oess than 1 ppb) from the swale Brook A and the Exeter River (S-l S-2 S-5 8-8 S-9 and S-10) One sediment sample (S-10) collected at the base of the piggeiY waste pile was reported to conlak the pesticide 44shyDDE at a concentration less than 15 ppb
HSL Inorganic Parameter Analysoa
Results of HSL inorganic paramcta analyses were compared to state or federal maximum contaminant limits primary or secondary drinking yenrater standards and EPA Ambient Water Quality (Mtcria as appropriate Based upon these comparisons reported concentrations of arsenic iron and manganese in ground water samples exceeded guidelines for at least one parameter bi samples from
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC
r Balsam Project 6186830 September 151989 Page 8
filVeen wells located both on site and off site The only elevated arsenic concentration reported in an off-site sample was from MW-19D Results for surface water samples indicated iron manganese or silver exceeded guidelines ior_at least one parameter atfive j f the ien sampling locatJona It diould be noted that inm and manganese standardsarc aesthetic andjgtot health based ~ guidelines
Results of sediment analyses were compared to a United States Cieological Survey (USOS) reference document (USGS Professional Paper 1270) vHiidt jM^vides average element concentrations in soils for the eastem United States Results rexjorled for the sediment data Indicated above average concentrations of arsenic barium cobalt lead manganese nidcel and xinc at one sediment sampling location locatisd at Ihe tose of the piggery waste jrfle (S-10) However elevated concentrations were not present in data collected at downstream sampling locatiltms Slightly elevated concentrations of some parameters wore also observed at five other sediment sampling locations
General Chomlstiy Parameters
Total and fecal coliform results for ground water were reported below the available guidelines exduding a result f^m one off-site well (MW-16D) Results for sulfate chloride nitrate and nitrite in ground water were all reported at concenlratioas below available state or federal guidelines Aivomalies were not observed in Uie results for TOC analyses Alkalinity results in ground water were reported below state guidelines however relatively higher concentrations of this parameter wore noted in samples com wells whidi also had relatively high reported values of VOCs (0W2SR 0W2DR 0W-4SR 0W-4DR M0-2S and M0-3SR) A similar trend was observed for the results from BOD and COD analyses
PROPOSED AXALYHCAL SUITE
VOCs appear to be the primary contaminants identified in samples collected during the April samplingprogram noting that MTBE was not Identified present in any sanples iWefore VCXS should be included la the second sampling round whidi wiU indude the same monitoring well and surface water sampling loeaUons ss the first sampling round
Tlie semi-volatile organic compounds identified in thc first round were reported a t relatively low concentrations and primarily fi^m samples collected in areas where notable concentrations of V(Xs were also identified Ihe other az^as where semivolatile organic compounds were estimated to be present eudi as samples from well lfW-13 and off-site locations were generallv at concentrations below contract dctectiim limits and are common environmental eontaminants not Ukely to be related to activities at the Mottolo site Therefore BsJsam proposes to collect and analvxe a limited number of samples fitgtm wells where the presence of semivolatile organic compounds firom site activities was indicated
bull ^ - bull [J I I i raquo l I X - bull W i
bull bull t j 3- n j ^ f l bdquo i i w g u Wraquo
i
I
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
r
^
Balsam PntJect 6165830
September 15 1089 Page 4
The results of the pestiddePCB analyses Indicate that trace concentrations of Aroclor 1260 were detected In several surface water and ground water samples a t concentration below 1 ppb Therefore samples will be collected f^ PCB
-analysis fiomJocations where P(2Bs vere previously detected^-as-wdl as J ^ _ limited number of locations where PCBs were not r epor t^ present ~ - ~
l l i e inorganic parameter analytical results indicate elevated concentrations of arsenic Iron and manganese at several monitoring well locations Based upon the review of these data Balsam proposes to include arsenic in the second round analytical suite since this parameter appears to correlate best wlUi areas of on-site contamination and belaquoiuse of relatively low toxidty of iron and manganese
Analytical results for the general chemistrv parameters were generally within accepted limits for naturally occurring media and significant trends or anomalies In these data were not noted Therefore resampling and analyses fbr the general chemisliy parameters would not likely provide significant additional information to thc Mottolo data base or improve site diaracterization efforts
A summary of the proposed second round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attadied Table 1 Several locations whore contaminants were not detected in Uie f^st sampling round will also be resampled for selected parameters to confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We arc scheduled to conduct sampling activities the wedi of Septembor 26 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this woric on schedule Please do not hesitate io contact Eric Wood or either of the undersigned if you have any questions
Sincerely
1 ltcQ Timothy a Stone CPG Bl Prqjeet Manager
Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager
c c J Pdtonen (Stark ft Peltonen) M Robinette (NHDES)
lt90^415
Attachment
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC
r Balsam Project 6186830 September 151989 Page 8
filVeen wells located both on site and off site The only elevated arsenic concentration reported in an off-site sample was from MW-19D Results for surface water samples indicated iron manganese or silver exceeded guidelines ior_at least one parameter atfive j f the ien sampling locatJona It diould be noted that inm and manganese standardsarc aesthetic andjgtot health based ~ guidelines
Results of sediment analyses were compared to a United States Cieological Survey (USOS) reference document (USGS Professional Paper 1270) vHiidt jM^vides average element concentrations in soils for the eastem United States Results rexjorled for the sediment data Indicated above average concentrations of arsenic barium cobalt lead manganese nidcel and xinc at one sediment sampling location locatisd at Ihe tose of the piggery waste jrfle (S-10) However elevated concentrations were not present in data collected at downstream sampling locatiltms Slightly elevated concentrations of some parameters wore also observed at five other sediment sampling locations
General Chomlstiy Parameters
Total and fecal coliform results for ground water were reported below the available guidelines exduding a result f^m one off-site well (MW-16D) Results for sulfate chloride nitrate and nitrite in ground water were all reported at concenlratioas below available state or federal guidelines Aivomalies were not observed in Uie results for TOC analyses Alkalinity results in ground water were reported below state guidelines however relatively higher concentrations of this parameter wore noted in samples com wells whidi also had relatively high reported values of VOCs (0W2SR 0W2DR 0W-4SR 0W-4DR M0-2S and M0-3SR) A similar trend was observed for the results from BOD and COD analyses
PROPOSED AXALYHCAL SUITE
VOCs appear to be the primary contaminants identified in samples collected during the April samplingprogram noting that MTBE was not Identified present in any sanples iWefore VCXS should be included la the second sampling round whidi wiU indude the same monitoring well and surface water sampling loeaUons ss the first sampling round
Tlie semi-volatile organic compounds identified in thc first round were reported a t relatively low concentrations and primarily fi^m samples collected in areas where notable concentrations of V(Xs were also identified Ihe other az^as where semivolatile organic compounds were estimated to be present eudi as samples from well lfW-13 and off-site locations were generallv at concentrations below contract dctectiim limits and are common environmental eontaminants not Ukely to be related to activities at the Mottolo site Therefore BsJsam proposes to collect and analvxe a limited number of samples fitgtm wells where the presence of semivolatile organic compounds firom site activities was indicated
bull ^ - bull [J I I i raquo l I X - bull W i
bull bull t j 3- n j ^ f l bdquo i i w g u Wraquo
i
I
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
r
^
Balsam PntJect 6165830
September 15 1089 Page 4
The results of the pestiddePCB analyses Indicate that trace concentrations of Aroclor 1260 were detected In several surface water and ground water samples a t concentration below 1 ppb Therefore samples will be collected f^ PCB
-analysis fiomJocations where P(2Bs vere previously detected^-as-wdl as J ^ _ limited number of locations where PCBs were not r epor t^ present ~ - ~
l l i e inorganic parameter analytical results indicate elevated concentrations of arsenic Iron and manganese at several monitoring well locations Based upon the review of these data Balsam proposes to include arsenic in the second round analytical suite since this parameter appears to correlate best wlUi areas of on-site contamination and belaquoiuse of relatively low toxidty of iron and manganese
Analytical results for the general chemistrv parameters were generally within accepted limits for naturally occurring media and significant trends or anomalies In these data were not noted Therefore resampling and analyses fbr the general chemisliy parameters would not likely provide significant additional information to thc Mottolo data base or improve site diaracterization efforts
A summary of the proposed second round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attadied Table 1 Several locations whore contaminants were not detected in Uie f^st sampling round will also be resampled for selected parameters to confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We arc scheduled to conduct sampling activities the wedi of Septembor 26 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this woric on schedule Please do not hesitate io contact Eric Wood or either of the undersigned if you have any questions
Sincerely
1 ltcQ Timothy a Stone CPG Bl Prqjeet Manager
Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager
c c J Pdtonen (Stark ft Peltonen) M Robinette (NHDES)
lt90^415
Attachment
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
i
I
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUUANTS INC
r
^
Balsam PntJect 6165830
September 15 1089 Page 4
The results of the pestiddePCB analyses Indicate that trace concentrations of Aroclor 1260 were detected In several surface water and ground water samples a t concentration below 1 ppb Therefore samples will be collected f^ PCB
-analysis fiomJocations where P(2Bs vere previously detected^-as-wdl as J ^ _ limited number of locations where PCBs were not r epor t^ present ~ - ~
l l i e inorganic parameter analytical results indicate elevated concentrations of arsenic Iron and manganese at several monitoring well locations Based upon the review of these data Balsam proposes to include arsenic in the second round analytical suite since this parameter appears to correlate best wlUi areas of on-site contamination and belaquoiuse of relatively low toxidty of iron and manganese
Analytical results for the general chemistrv parameters were generally within accepted limits for naturally occurring media and significant trends or anomalies In these data were not noted Therefore resampling and analyses fbr the general chemisliy parameters would not likely provide significant additional information to thc Mottolo data base or improve site diaracterization efforts
A summary of the proposed second round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attadied Table 1 Several locations whore contaminants were not detected in Uie f^st sampling round will also be resampled for selected parameters to confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We arc scheduled to conduct sampling activities the wedi of Septembor 26 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this woric on schedule Please do not hesitate io contact Eric Wood or either of the undersigned if you have any questions
Sincerely
1 ltcQ Timothy a Stone CPG Bl Prqjeet Manager
Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager
c c J Pdtonen (Stark ft Peltonen) M Robinette (NHDES)
lt90^415
Attachment
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSaTANTS INC
TASLKl r SECOND ROUND SAMPLING SUMBfART
MOTTOLO S m S RIFfl
Soptombor 1989
Parametlaquors traquo bo Analysed
HSL Sampling Sample HSL HSL P C B I HSL Location Numbor VOCs SemiVOCs Psttiridea Artenie Metals
1101 MTLOWMOMO X M028 MTLOWM028-ira X X X
X M03SR - MTL-GWM03SR104 X X lf02DR MTLQWMO2DR-108 X X
IfOSDR MTLGWMOSDR106 X X
M04S MTLOWMO48106 X X M04D MrM2W-MO4Igt107 X X MOSS MTIXIW-MOSS-108 X M06DR MTLGW-M05DR109 Z M06 MTL-OW-MOe-llO x
MW7S MTL^WMW7S-lll X MW7D MTW5WMW7D-112 x MW8S MTI^0WMW8S-11S X X MW8D MTLltWMW8gt114 X MW9S MTL^WMW9S-11S
MW9D MTU0W-MWraquotgtU6 x MWIOD MTL-OWgtMW10Igt117 x MWllD MTLCW-MWllD-118 z MW12S MTLGW-MW12S-119 x MW120 MTL-GWMW12D120 X
MW18S MTLGW-MW18S-121 x MWISD MTL-GWMW18D-122 x MW149 MTU]nV-MW14S123 x MW14D MTL-QW-MW14D124 x MWlfiS MTLOWMW1SS125 x
MW15D MTlrOWMWIQD-126 s MW16D MTr^W-MWl6D127 X MW17D MTL-GWMW17D128 x MW18S MTL-GW-MW18S-129 x MWISD MTL^W-MW18D-1S0 x
MW19D MTL^WMW1SD]81 X MWSOS MTLGWMW20S132 o n n n MW30D MTUWMW20Igt-1S$ n n n n MW21S MTLGW-MW2IS-184 n n n n MW22D MTLC1WMW21D185 a n D n
Septembor 15 1989 Babam Pri^^ct 618SB30S418A Fagelora
bullisC-0raquo^-raquoraquofiwtiw
-i-o-v- bullbull bull
y - y y y - y y ^bullbully-^-^y
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
BALSAM ENVIR0NMEN1AL CONSUJANTS INC
TABUS 1 CONTINUED
Parameters to be Anolyxed
Sampling SampleLocation Number
OW8SR MTL-0Wgt0W2SR-lSeOW2DR MTWW)W2DRJ870W3R MTL^SW^WSR-ISSOW4SR MTL-GW-OW4SR-IS90W4DR MTLOW^W4DR-140
Doplicatc MTL-aWDUP-141B-l MTL-SW-SMOOS4 MTL8W-S2-10284 MTL-SW-S310S8-4 MTL-SW-84-104
8 laquo MTL8W-851068 4 MTL8W-S61068-7 MTL^W-S7-I078 laquo MTL-SW-S8-1088-raquo MTL-SW-S9109
8-10 MTL8W410-U0Duplkato MTLSW-DUP-111Trip Blank MTL-QA-101Trip Blank MTL-QA^KBT r Blank MTL-QA-IOS
Field Blank M T L ^ 1 C 4Blank MTLQA-106
FScU Blank MTL-QA-106
Nclcr
HSL HSL HSL PCBs VOCs SemiVOCs Pestiddei
X X X X X ~ X shy
X X X X ~
X X
^ x X X X X a x
x x x x x x X X X
x + + -i-
^ -t 4
Arsenic HSL
Metaii
X X
X
raquo 4
HSL VOCs - Hazardotu aubstancc Hst volatile organic compounds including telnihydngtruran X bull ParBmeter(8) delected in April 1989 tMimplo X a Paranieter(gt) oot detected in April 1989 sample m lt^iality control samplet tt laquo New sampling location = Innifficient quontily of sample obLiiinitd in April 1989 to anolyzo for these parameters raquo Piroposed monitoring wolU
SepCcfBber 151989 Ba l s aa Prqeci 618amp^830241fiA Page s of 2
TDTPL Fer
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
APPENDIX 2
ffell Construction Details
^ bull ^ y 7 y - y [ bull bull y - bull bull - r - - bull V ^ I
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
APPENDIX 2
Hottolo Site Raymond New BaB|gtshlre
Mell Construction Specifications for Monitoring Hfcll Couplets M-20 and llf-21
Measurements sade on Septenter 28 1989
Monitoring Well IW-20S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 101 (GS) Depth to water - 215 (GS) Sticktq) of inner PVC Casing - 29 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 30
Monitoring Well MH-20O
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Ttotal Well Depth - 459 (GS) Depth to water gt 335 (GS) Stickvf) of Inner PVC Casing - 184 Stlckiqp of Outer Steel Casing - 208
Monitoring Well JW-21S
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Bottosi of Boring - 9 (G^S) Well Screen - 8 to 5 (GS) Sand Pack - 8 to 35 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 35^ to 2 (GS) concrete (Sakrette) Seal - 2 - Ground Surface Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 285 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing bull - 330 Depth to Water gt 65raquo (GS)
Monitoring Well Ilaquof-21D
Outer Casing Diameter - 25 Well Diameter - 2 Total Well Depth - 450 top of PVC Stidnm Well Screen- 414 to 214 (GS) Sand Pack - 414 to 172 (GS) Bentonite Seal - 172 to 137 (GS) Cement Grout - 137 to Ground Surface Depth to water - 92 (GS) Rock Bticountered - 105 (GS) Stickup of Inner PVC Casing - 36 Stickup of Outer Steel Casing - Utaknom
a ^ m ^ 9 W t ^ bull J lt 1 I - ^ i i i i j i i i i bull bull 1 1 I 1 - ^
yM^y
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
APPENDIX 3
Data Description Forms
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
SAHPLB DESCRIFTIQN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE BMnCND NEW RANPSHIBE
BOUHD II GROUCHKTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK or SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCAnOi lflaquo-8S SAMPLING DATE ^ M ( SAMPLING TIME 1 ^ ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J V A ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MA3niIX-lt90UNDNATER SAMPLE DBSC -shyWELL BBPra f5^6 S-gt WELL DIA 70ia PURGEVOLUME ty^ lt1lt- ICPTH TO WATER 7^f5 s) STREAH DEPTH SAMPLER TXPE ASltlaquolaquor
BOITLB SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML
1 LIIBt METALS SZo^ci lt ^ S a ^ 3 0 X S raquoraquo3
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
90 coNDOcnviTy TEMPERA3URE S ^ C ^
ccwnns S c ^ l lt s laquo ^ ^ l - c ^ c T^^^^^-J^ r ^ lt ^
s-PCr^i^rss^
bull gt bull bull - bull bull bull mdash
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAUOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUMXAIER AND SURFACE WAIER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN MN-13D SAMPLING EATE ltll7| l SAMPLING TIME Vl-^ OBGANIC TRAFHC N0AQ40t- INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO HA SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUCWKTER SAMPLE DESC C ^ c WELL DEPTH 1laquoJI5r^s) WELL DIA t FUDGE VOLUME if laquoIWgt DEPTH TO WATER -VM JS-J STREAM DEPra A SAMPLER T^fPE-^oA^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG N O LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
5ZWt SZSl ^ isSRiS HCL 4 0 ML VOC
INSTRUHE24T READINGS BALSAMS
PH r y CONDUCTIVITJf a o lUfPEKASURE lo^
4lt(
15 ^ | U j uraquolaquolaquo oW-ci^a^ ampU-H 5laquo^jlt t^(Vltllaquoi^ ^U^ 5 (gtgt
_ _ X _ - - r ^ - ^ r r j = r ^ i ^ r gt gt bull bull bull bull 1 mdash ^ - bull bullmdashUSshy
t bull bull bull shy
I
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUM) I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN O M S R SAMPLING DAIE H l U l S P i SAMPLING TIME^Jf ^ l O ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO Wi MO 3 frfr^l INORGANIC TRAFnC MO MAufMI SAMPLE HATRI]bGROUNDIATER SAMPLE DESC ^ r 1 WELL DEPTH ^ ^ laquo WELL D I A -2shy ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ X PURGE VOLUMESTREAM DEPra
^ f T i r
DEPTH TO WATER j f i d ^ y amp ^ y h - O
SAMPLER TYPE f^^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC BCL
SO OZ svx
LITER METEALS 9103 7laquoraquo
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
SnfelmviTY ^(gto^-gt^^cJrgt
TEMPERATURE V t
OOMHENrS MSMSD (l^t^jrx
^ ^X npfgtfrgt Iff kU-d^fgt
r - bull - mdash bull ^ gt J V 9 ^ - ^ ^ rr T-rr^^r^r -n
-T-^rTTr^^fprshy
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
SAMPLE KSCRIPTICN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Iff-ISD SAMPLING CME 1 ^ ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO j C ^ O ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND l ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-GROUNDraquoniER SAMPLE DESC - bdquo- t^^ VCVLlaquoraquoV WELL KPTH WELL DIA Gr Ot^ FURCZ VOLUME raquo Ulow DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH gtilA SAMPLER TYPE WA^r
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TMG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^ t 7 ^iilgt (5 ^ fV3 40 ML VOC BCL
INSIRUHEm READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^ ^ T ^ CONDUCTIVITY - euro laquo yen - c laquo TElfPESAIURE f3gpound XL C
^lgtufv-pltW
y
bull raquoraquo I i ^raquogtn i_laquo H I J U raquobulllaquobullbull H i Jpy rmdashrmdash traquofXJkjm^^ji^y~t i - ~ ^ J H ^ iraquo^ I ^ ^ j ^ i f t j i r
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAXMCND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SANPLE L O Q m C N M0-3SR SAMPLING CATE ^ iTS^f t^ SAMPLING TIME ^^lti e g - 7 ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A ^ M O INORGANIC TRAFFIC NOMA-^^ SAMPLE HATRIX-GROUraMATER SAMPLE DESC S ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^ j h S V WELL DIA- Z ^ P ^ C PURGE VOLUME - S tu -P DEPTH TD WATER ^ y j ^ ^ STREAM K P T H t i l M SAMPLER TYPE - 5 A laquo ^
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC Ba LITER METALS BN03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH CONDUCTIVITY O g o u ^ ^ raquo y c v TEMPERATURE ^ ^ ^
OQHHENTS
l laquo - ^ a J raquo T l - ^ JU i bull bull trshy
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOnOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNOATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBQl 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN J10 3sectp SAMPLING EAIE 9 ^ V ^ SAMPLING TIME raquo laquo = 0 X ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AfrSD^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO raquo4t- =- SAMPLE MAIRIX-GROUNOWTER SAMPLE DESC G^o-WELL DEPTH JV WELL DIA- ^ F ^ ^ PURGE VOLUME sTS DEPTH TO WATER - ( - ^ STREAM OTPTH A^ SAMPLER TYPE 9 laquo t ^
BOTTLE SIZE AIALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC Ra 1 LITER HBIALS HN03
INSTRUHEUr READINGS BALSAMS
ra OONDUCTlVlTy ^^0ulaquolaquoW5( lv^ TEMPERATURE J C
COMMENTS DUP Ol M0-3SR
~ y y y r ~ y T ^ mdash r r - z mdash - r r c ^ - - ^ bull bull ^ ^ T V ^ ^ bullbullbullbull-lty bull
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
SAMPLE DESCRIPnCN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNCMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN Mf- l lD SAMPLING DATE ^xilt - SAMPLING TIME fUO ORGANIC IRAFFIC NO A lt H o 1 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO gt lt SAMPLE MATRIX-CROUNDKATER SAMPLE DESC Iltgtvlaquoty WELL DBPIH lt 0 WELL DIAraquo VDlt^ PURGE VOLUME A |S^ltf^ UEPTH TO WATER - 10copy^ STREAM DEPTHA^A SAMPLER TYPE^ 0 lt x a laquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
$ t laquo ^ - ^ tgt2ri^3^H3 40 ML VDC - W laquo g ^
80 OZ PESTPCB n - ^ 0 A l $ ^ b 5 3
INSIRUHSrr READINGS BALSAMS
SNDOCTIVITY - ^ ^ ^ W TEMPERATURE - I ^ C
CCMHENTS ^ 3 gt lt-laquo raquo- S ti S^laquo^ci-cXlt t t f ^ S ^ e ^ i ^ ^
bull c^^^^^ ltxvVlaquoo^rr^laquofeVy 7 3 ^ V ^ ^ 1 i gt c y j l
s j l _ J raquo _ i j y j u laquo i i
TMgjgtjraquouyiaraquolaquo-r- - y bullbullbull 7T^
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-3 SAMPLING DATE i M l H SAMPLING TIME gtlaquo ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AS HOtAimd INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO bullJ (A SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC c l w WELL CraquoaTH HA WELL DIA DM PURGE VOLUME N(A nCPTH TO WATER ftU STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC Ha 80 OE PESTPCB tM7 AlaquoltS633
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
COMJUCnVITY laquoV- laquo Y^ TEMPERATURE 1 t
o o m a w s ^ ^ ^ v ltraquoiUtkA ^ -ltraquobullltbull t i ^ t bullbull J r lt ^
raquo^^~_^ mdashr~T7T^~~^7^^^ bull
J T M U ^ A raquo J raquo raquo ^ ^ ^ raquo
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
HOTTOLO SITE RAYNOW) NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN S-13 SAMPLING DATE ^ j raquo SAMPLING TIME XOtOl ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO AQ 0 ACiN INORGANIC TRAFFIC ND alA SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WATER SAMPLE DESC Cko-WELL ISPTH J(A WELL DIA MraquoA PURGE VOLUME rIA DEPTH TO WATER 0)A STREAM DEPTH ^4 9 laquo | SAMPLER TIFE ^ ^AVMA^A braquoVUlaquo
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VDC 5 l l ^ f M A Ha t f1J54M3
80 OZ PESTPCB $1100 AUlaquo33
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY j^mUt^f cm TEMPERATURE ^ f
COMMENTS DUP OF S-3 $^y^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^
KT gtvTTg^y^iity^tgy pbull-bull bullbullbull bull -fW T
1
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
SAMPLE reSCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
KUtS) I I QtOUNDWUTER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION S-6 SAMPLING DATE y t f SAMPLING TIME fshy ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Q ^ i O ki^^fVi INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO J SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACENATER SAMPLE DESC c^ltar HELL DEPTH raquoraquoA WELL D I A raquo^A PURGE VOLUME N I S DEPTH TO WATER m A STREAM DEPTH laquo0 bullbull laquo raquo i l i i t ( bullltltbulllaquo SAMPIpoundR TYPE t laquo V v laquo v ^raquovu
BOTILE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC PB amp5yY^ acL
BOOZ PESTPCB ^ ^ 2 ( 1 ^^l(a03
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
CONDUCTIVITY 2 o J A ^ ^ 9 TEMPERATURE ^
COMMENTS ^
laquo lt laquo ^
tAtLtc^^ a^s^riK 596f^^ 410s c^Araquo^iJiM t^a-fL ^^slaquojffiifshy
wStti-r ^rc^T^
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
SAMPU DESCRIPTION SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAOOD NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND II GROUraMATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK CF SEPTEMBER 25 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION S-9 SAMPLING DATE 1 i - ^9 (V^ SAMPLING TIME ^^ ^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO ^ Q H u f G f ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO SAMPLE MATRIX-SURFACE WMER^ SAMPLE DESC - ^A^i^ WELL DEPTH Mil WELL DIA raquoraquoIA PURGE VOUJg M)ik DEPTH TO WATER laquo)A STREAM DBFTB ^9 SAMPLER TYPE f S k xAAC CMVCMT
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VOC ^^f^fttu t ) S 3 ^ ^ 3 Ba
80 OZ PESTPCB iz XHi A r n t p i ^ M
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH gt laquo ^ CONDUCTIVITY ^t) ^^Uaic^ TEMPERATURE iO r
COMMENTS U tXt y ^ raquolaquo $Vraquoe-m W i lo Hlaquo-^
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOmOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNEMATER AND SURFACE WOER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTQIBER 2 5 1989
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATION SW-7B-01 SAMPLING DATE laquo i i (t^ SAMPLING TIME ^ U H S ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^ Q ^ W INORGANIC TRAFnC NO raquogtlaquoA SAMPIE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC w laquo t e v C^raquoSTraquoW6V) WELL DEPTH raquogtA WELL DIA toA PURGEVOLUME MIA DEPTH TD WATBt laquo IA STREAM DEPTH MIA SAMPLER TYPE AA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT MO PRESERVATIVE
4 0 ML VOC ^ l H X f i lt Ml6$ltltlaquo3 H a
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
PH A CONDUCTIVITY AgtM TQIFERA3URE alA
COMMENTS TRIP BLANK CONSISTING OF DISTILLED fATER
X ^ J - gt l ) p
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE l A I E R SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 12791 SAMPLE LOCATIGN SN-TB-02 SAMPLING OATE laquolaquo laquoht(M SANPLING TIME laquolaquoi UOO ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO 4kQ laquoltt3 INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO OIA SAMPLE MATRIX- TRIP BLANK SAMPLE DESC tgtlaquoTilttC) wltrrtraquo WELL DEPTH raquo)A WELL DIA iA PURGE VCTJUME itfA DEPTH TO WAIER fiA STREAM KPTH AA SAMPLER TYPE MA
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
40 ML VX 5Jaso75raquotlaquolt V t s s ^ n j aa
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
P B gt ^ CONDUCTIVITy laquoA TEMPERATURE ^ j
COMMENTS T R I P BLANK OCNSISTING OF DISTILLED WATER
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIGN SHEETS
MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION M9-101 SAMPLING DATE l z n l t ^ SAMPLING TIME ^ - ^ ^ ^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO t ^k INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO h ^ L b ^ Y SANPLE MATRIX- P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH A raquo WELL m K A ^ ^ 1 PURGE VOLUME A X K P T H TO WATER v STREAM DEPTH SAMPLER TYPE gt
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO PRESERVATIVE
^fL^^^ ^ O t OOO^^ LITER METALS ^Ol5
INSTRUMBIT READINGS BALSAMS
FH CONDUCTIVITY N j J A TEMPERATURE - ^
COMMENTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS
HOTTOLO S I T E RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE
ROUND I I GROUNDWOER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING WEEK OP SEPTEMBER 2 5 1 9 8 9
CASE NO 1 2 7 9 1 SAMPLE LOCATION MW-102 SAMPLING DATE ^ J l l ] ^ ^ SAMPLING TIME ^^^ ORGANIC TRAFFIC NO A Z A INORGANIC TRAFFIC NO f l A N ^ ^ ^ SAMPLE MATRIX-[- P P E BLANK SAMPLE DESC WELL DEPTH WELL DIA PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER STREAM DEPTH ISAMPLER TYPE
BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO raSSERVATIVE
-7T-210 f J b XJ^CI^ qc72VI^3 1 LITER METALS
INSTRUMENT READINGS BALSAMS
ra ^J(1 CONDUCTIVITY
TOIPERATURE CCNMEirTS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLE SUBMITTED TO CCM FPC BY SNO
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
APPEIDU 4
Traffic Reports and O a i ^ o f ^ t e d y fon-B
I I
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
bull ]lt l l l l l
M 0 M e Thrfne Riport m^sm^^^^^F^ j^iypeerA0Mtr(bMew |C9^rzsr
ATM bullbull bull
bull )
bull i
-bullbullif^--]i
FP4 raquoWin iMtr t^ mJim nlaquoraquo^i-ltlaquor P P laquo erfm v r r r e - i laquo bull bull ^
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
^ bull ^ i V ^ ^ ^ e n a g e m e h t DlWaion t
J^HAINOFOu^n ^ n i M O ^ M c
NO
J f | jgt r gt bull bull bull bull^ mm i-a TrMS I i v bulllt STAt lON LOCATION gtN
m
v bullbullbull 0 ^
eoN-TAINCHl 3 REMARKS
A bull M -1 bull ^v --^ bull 1
r i^ i rVv- I - -bullbull
bull bull - bull - bull bull bull bull - bull bull ( ^ ^ ^ bullbull^^i ^ i^- r Lioi
iifcL-L^ 4-^ bullf shy
d-iiihi^ Ji-v I J I l
bull ) bull bull bull iJishybull - v ^ bull 1
bull bull bull ^ bull J 1
y
r i MlSraquo^ - U
rt^
laquo - 7 f laquo F raquo laquo raquo w bullbullbullbull-A gtNgtlnqtgtlaquojhetfnyltaraquogtltiiltiiJ^ bullbullbullbull- vPtiiTIWfbullgtbullbull Ih
i bullbullif^i-Mgtir^ngtii iiiii^itifc vltiii^ijbdquoij^iigtiyi iw bullbull-igtu- i l fe^ lu Si ^A^ bfitHbMiOT OrigiruMAeeofnpwtlMShiprm^ I
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
gtli]ni4wnwiwltilRwiwltonAS5y ~ l e i r OiQtfilc IMHc Ripoft mvsn
(RtrOPUmOm^ JbrliaaiaagtP
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
^^v^loft I Waete Manaoement (JiVllton OI^(3Ais)ib
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
I m^x bullbullbull^ raquo fn-mm nbdquoi-bdquo rplaquo r
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
I ii i j i i iuiiifirntfiii bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull bull ^ ^ ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull bull ^ bull bull B
raquo
nrafllbflipibilgt jni|| | iLjbdquoj j
a^gt^Tltt-f 5^ J L 4 A - L laquo 1bull oanmoawaMT bull Z Qnund H M r j ^ iwi^^^ ^ 3 Hanfiae bull
N wokMw WqiAvd tor IMMX 1 nmSr v - OL BoiSMrraml shy
amp0 I (8A$1 ^ C a r s rJuH4gtOalaquol^^raquo^Slaquoi bullbull bull
amp 0lher(8Mraquo(eraquo^iK4^
JSMioaan-^
^
bull^atr--j^ lt i bull
toiVif^
raquo bull bull
i ^ (bull
f^l M
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
T ^NSGENCY r bullbullbullbullV j vV^vgt ^ gtrV( bullbull bull bull bullbullbull n^bullbull-bullbull ^ i t ^ gt v ^ v gt - bull bull i -l
^i^iV gt gt bull V bull --I i - O gtii ygt
bull ^ ^ ^ ^n l - Bifc^|lfr^ir-^a L^^^^ i S^t^V iVV bull laquo bull (
rgtS fJy- ^ ^ s y r bull S M to lt i ^
bull i rgt V - Y bull1 VbullTATioNioiMt id^ l - i- - M
bull i y i i i i ^
bull^s bullHv- bullVSt
i
bullbullbullbull^bull
gt bull -
bull K r bull
^
^ ^ bull T
gtw^y^
Vi
^ C I V
f z i r^nfc
r^i^
-i^^v$^^gt
