Transport Development Strategy for Hanoi (HAIDEP) · services • Car numbers may not decrease much...
Transcript of Transport Development Strategy for Hanoi (HAIDEP) · services • Car numbers may not decrease much...
21 – 23 June 2006, HanoiALMEC Corporation, Japan
Transport Development StrategyTransport Development Strategyfor Hanoi (HAIDEP)for Hanoi (HAIDEP)
The International Seminar on Sustainable Land Use and The International Seminar on Sustainable Land Use and Transport PlanningTransport Planning
1
TopicsTopics
• Development trend in Vietnam
• Context and approach
• Regional transportation development
• Urban transportation situation
• Urban development orientation
• Urban transportation development orientation
• UMRT development
• Other important areas of concern
• Investment plan and evaluation
2
• Urbanization• Industrialization• Motorization• Globalization
Growth of cities (no. and size)Economic growth with changes in sector structureChanging lifestyles and diversifying needsIncreasing concern on environmentIncreasing difficulties in sector management
GDP per capita (US$, log)
0
20
40
60
80
10 100 1000 10000 100000
Urb
an P
opul
atio
n R
atio
(%)
JapanKorea
Philippines
Thailand
China
Indonesia
Malaysia
CambodiaVietnam
Development Trend in VietnamDevelopment Trend in Vietnam
3
• Increasing traffic congestions and worsening safety and environment.
• Weak traffic management.• Low awareness of traffic rules and safety.• Insufficient public transport services.• Lack of roads and slow development.• Lack of funding and funding mechanism.
Need for comprehensive and strategic approach.
Context and ApproachContext and ApproachMain Issues in Urban Transportation Main Issues in Urban Transportation
4
• Integrated development:Transportation, urban development, and land use/ environment.Inter-city and urban.Intermodal role-sharing.Infrastructure and services.
• Infrastructure development < service provision and management.
• Public-transport-based urban growth and development.• Sustainable funding and project prioritization.• Critical attention to key social and environmental issues.
Approach to Urban Transportation DevelopmentApproach to Urban Transportation Development
Context and ApproachContext and Approach
5
• “to promote the effective growth of Hanoi” and “to ensure necessary mobility and accessibility to urban services for the people and society”
Goal of the Transportation SectorGoal of the Transportation Sector
Objectives of the Transportation Sector Objectives of the Transportation Sector
• Develop integrated/ intermodal urban transportation system with competitive international/regional intermodaltransportation network to provide seamless service for trade andpassenger travel.
• Build efficient, high-quality public transportation systemthrough combined urban rail, BRT, feeder bus, taxi, and others to decongest traffic and ensure accessibility and public safety.
• Establish effective management system to optimize available infrastructure, including maintenance, traffic control, parking management, safety, air pollution, etc as well as sustainable funding mechanism.
Context and ApproachContext and Approach
6
Regional TranspRegional Transportationortation DemandDemandInterprovincial Traffic Distribution in the Study Area
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1999 2005 2020
Railw ayRoad BusRoad Car
000 No/ day
(%)107417
(%) 86725
(%) 8
40
52
0
100
200
300
400
500
1999 2005 2020
Railw ay CargoIWTRoad Truck
000 Tons/ day
(%)121177
(%) 43363
(%) 4
40
56
PassengerPassenger FreightFreight
Regional Transportation DevelopmentRegional Transportation Development
7
• Regional coordination/integration• Growth corridors• Competitive industrial development and market integration• Strategic transport system development
Regional Development DirectionRegional Development Directionss
• Effective urban development• Strengthen urban – rural
linkages• Effective land-use and
environmental management• Social and cultural
integration and development• Strengthen development
administration
Regional Transportation DevelopmentRegional Transportation Development
8
• Balanced development for mutual benefits for and role-sharing among Hanoi and neighboring areas
• Strategic transportation and infrastructure development
Spatial Structure in Areas within 30Spatial Structure in Areas within 30--50 km Radius from50 km Radius fromHanoi and Role of TransportationHanoi and Role of Transportation
Regional Transportation DevelopmentRegional Transportation Development
9
City Including Walking
Excluding Walking
HCMC 3.0 2.5Hanoi 2.6 2.0Bangkok 2.3 n.aTokyo 2.6 n.a
• High mobility80% of households own a M/C45% of households own more than 2
• Good accessibilityaverage travel time to work: 20 minutes
• Bad safetyhigh accident rate: highest in Asia
Trip Rate (no. of trips/day/person)
Urban Transportation SituationUrban Transportation SituationCharacteristics of Urban Transportation Characteristics of Urban Transportation
Assessment (%)Ave. Travel Time (min)
Bad So-so Good
Walking 13.1 1.2 27.0 71.7Bicycle 17.9 3.1 37.5 59.4Motorcycle (Driving) 20.8 4.9 40.0 55.1
Motorcycle (Passenger) 19.3 3.1 33.2 63.8
Xe om 20.8 5.3 46.9 47.8Car 49.0 3.8 31.0 65.2Bus 45.0 6.2 45.0 48.8Others 54.9 4.0 38.0 58.0TOTAL 19.1 3.2 35.0 61.8TOTAL (excluding
walking)21.9 4.2 38.7 57.1
10
Hanoi HCMC
19951) 20052) 19963) 20024)
Bicycle 61.1 27.9 32.0 13.6Motorcycle 35.8 59.6 64.0 79.0
Car 1.1 2.5 1.0 1.6Bus 0.6 5.6 2.0 2.1Others 1.4 4.5 1.0 3.8
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Mode
1) SIDA VUTAP (urban districts only)2) HAIDEP HIS
3) HCMC Transport Study (1996, DFID)4) JICA HOUTRANS
Urban Transportation SituationUrban Transportation Situation
Significant Shift in Modal ChoicesSignificant Shift in Modal Choices
Modal Shares of Person Trips (%)
11
M/C Car Bus
Space EfficiencyPCU 0.25 ~ 0.5 1.0 2.5
Ave. Occupancy
1.36 2.02 17.92
Loading Capacity/PCU
2.7 ~ 5.4 2.0 7.2
VOC at 20 kph(VND/vehicle-km)
582 3,178 5,082
VOC at 20 kph(VND/pass.-km)
435 1,573 284
Cost Efficiency
Number of Lanes(Two-way)
6+ lanes4 lanes2 lanes1 lane
(One-way)
4+ lanes3 lanes2 lanes
Number of Lanes(Two-way)
6+ lanes4 lanes2 lanes1 lane
(One-way)
4+ lanes3 lanes2 lanes
Motorcycle EfficiencyMotorcycle Efficiency
Urban Transportation SUrban Transportation Siittuuaattiioonn
12
Future of Motorcycles and CarsFuture of Motorcycles and Cars Urban Transportation SUrban Transportation Siittuuaattiioonn
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
100 1,000 10,000 100,000GDP[US$]
MalysiaThailand
Two-
whe
eled
veh
icle
ow
ners
hip
ratio
[veh
icle
/1,0
00po
p]
Japan
Korea
PakistanPhilippines
Developed Countries
HICs
UMICs
LMICs
LICs
LLDCs
Bangladesh
Lao
Vietnam
Mongolia
Sri Lanka
Indonesi
Taiwan
Singapore
Hong Kong
CambodiaIndia
M/C Hanoi HCMC
In year 2000
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
100 1,000 10,000 100,000GDP[US$]
India
Four
-whe
eled
veh
icle
ow
ners
hip
ratio
[veh
icle
/1,0
00po
p]
Laos
Mongolia
PhilippinesPakistan
Indonesia
Bangladesh
Vietnam Developed Countries
HICs
UMICs
LMICs
LICs
LLDCs
Cambodia
Sri Lanka
Thailand
Japan
Hong Kong
Taiwan
SingaporeKorea
MalysiaCarHanoi
HCMC
In year 2000
Hanoi: 2003HCMC: 2002
Hanoi: 2003HCMC: 2002
13
• Traffic safety on roads is the most serious concern of the people.
• Providing adequate public transportation services is much expected by the people.
• People are against paying additional charges/fees.
People’s Expectation for the Future
People’s Concerns on Transportation Services
Need to promote social Need to promote social understanding and understanding and acceptance of policiesacceptance of policies
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Traffi
c sa
fety
Road
s and
facil
ities
Traff
ic en
force
ment
Trav
el co
nditio
ns
Traff
ic co
ntro
l mea
sure
s
Publi
c tra
nspo
rtatio
n
Air po
llutio
n fro
m vehic
les
Walk
ing co
nditio
n
Parki
ng at
desti
natio
n
Parki
ng at
home
1
2
3
4
5
Asse
ssm
ent
(ave
rage
)
Most ImportantAssessment Point
Very Good
Good
So-so
Bad
Very Bad0
10
20
30
40
50
60%
Traffi
c sa
fety
Road
s and
facil
ities
Traff
ic en
force
ment
Trav
el co
nditio
ns
Traff
ic co
ntro
l mea
sure
s
Publi
c tra
nspo
rtatio
n
Air po
llutio
n fro
m vehic
les
Walk
ing co
nditio
n
Parki
ng at
desti
natio
n
Parki
ng at
home
1
2
3
4
5
Asse
ssm
ent
(ave
rage
)
Most ImportantAssessment Point
Very Good
Good
So-so
Bad
Very Bad
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%Tr
affic
Rules
Bus P
riorit
yRe
strict
ed A
rea
Tax
User
Cha
rge
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Public
Trans
port
Traff
ic Ru
lesBu
s Prio
rity
Restr
icted
Are
aPr
ivate
secto
r
parti
cipati
on Tax
User
Cha
rge
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%Tr
affic
Rules
Bus P
riorit
yRe
strict
ed A
rea
Tax
User
Cha
rge
0102030405060708090
100%
Public
Trans
port
Traff
ic Ru
lesBu
s Prio
rity
Restr
icted
Are
aPr
ivate
secto
r
parti
cipati
on Tax
User
Cha
rge
NoNot SureYes
NoNot SureYes
PeoplePeople’’s Opinions on s Opinions on Urban Transportation Urban Transportation
Urban Transportation SUrban Transportation Siittuuaattiioonn
14
Future Populations (2020)Future Populations (2020)
Area 1998 MP HMA Plan Trend Proposed
Urban 2,8002) 3,7004) 4,0002) 3,9002)
Rural 1,100 6003) 800 600
Total 3,900 4,300 4,800 4,500
Adjacent Area1) n.a. 800 300 600
Total n.a. 5,100 5,100 5,100
Hanoi
1) Including Ha Dong, Tram Troi, and An Khanh in Ha Tay Province; Phuc Yen and Me Linh in Vinh Phuc Province; Tu Son in Bac Ninh Province; and Nhu Quynh in Hung Yen Province.
2) Including Soc Son.3) Rural population by 2020 was estimated based on the 2010 figure, which was calculated
based on the total population of Hanoi City forecasted in the SEDP 2006-2010.4) The HMA Development Plan of MOC (2005) estimated that the population growth of
Hanoi between 2003 and 2020 would be 1.9 million comprising natural growth and migration on top of the existing 1.8 million as of 2003.
Urban Development OrientationUrban Development Orientation
Hanoi and Integrated Areas
15
• Population of Hanoi: 4.5 millionurban: 3.9 millionrural: 0.6 million
• Population of integrated urban areas of adjoining provinces: 0.6 million
• Water, green & culture as backbone of the city
• Public transport-based city• Polycentric spatial structure within
the city and in the metropolitan areas
• Integrated land-use and transport infrastructure
• Separation/Proper interface of inter-city and urban transport
Urban Development OrientationUrban Development Orientation
Proposed Draft General Proposed Draft General Plan, 2020Plan, 2020
16
• Growth towards north, west, and east
• Expansion of urban areas beyond Hanoi’s boundary
• De-densification of city center population
Urban Development OrientationUrban Development Orientation
Population DistributionPopulation Distribution
17
Development of Development of Modern and Modern and Competitive Competitive SubcentersSubcenters
Urban Development OrientationUrban Development Orientation
18
Urban Transportation Development OrientationUrban Transportation Development Orientation
Planning PrinciplesPlanning Principles• Effective interface between regional and urban transport• Comprehensive and integrated development
– intermodal linkages (road, rail, IWT, air)– passenger and cargo
• Transport development integrated with urban growth management– mass transit development to improve accessibility to
and promote investment in the city centre– mass transit development to promote suburbanization
efficiently and effectively• Effective use of transport infrastructure/ facilities
– traffic management, demand management, pricing– maintenance
• Stage development
19
◄◄ Main Components Main Components ►►
• Development of roads and strengthening of road network
• Long-term strategies for mass transit development
• Modernization of bus services
• Strengthening road traffic control and management
• Enhancement of social awareness on traffic rules and safety
• Expansion of funding sources
Planning Scope Planning Scope • Comprehensive transport system
(provincial/urban transport, intermodal, logistics
• Road network and facilities• Traffic management/ safety• Public transportation system• Transport space/ environment• Transport sector administration
◄◄ Modal Share of Urban Transportation Modal Share of Urban Transportation ►►
2005 2010 2020
50%M/C
Car
7.8 mil trips/day
15.1 mil trips/day
Urban Transportation Development OrientationUrban Transportation Development Orientation
Bus
Metro
Taxi, etc
20
Future DemandFuture Demand• If current trend
continues, car traffic will increase while M/C will not decrease much.
➞need for proactive measures to expand public transportation services
• Car numbers may not decrease much even if public transportation services are much improved.
➞need for drastic measures to control car use
◄◄ Estimated Future DemandEstimated Future Demand ►►
20202005
Trend PT 30%
PT 50%
Bicycle 25.6 19.3 16.0 11.7
Motorcycle 63.9 44.0 33.8 20.6
Car 3.7 26.1 20.0 18.0
Public Transport 1) 6.8 10.6 30.2 49.5
% 100 100 100 100
Million trips/day 6.2 11.1 11.1 11.1
Total
1) Public transportation includes rail, BRT, and bus.
◄◄ Impact of Demand on Road Traffic Impact of Demand on Road Traffic ►►
• Traffic demand: 1.88• Ave. trip length: 1.36• Shift to cars: 1.26
1.88 x 1.36 x 1.26 = 3.2 times
Urban Transportation Development Urban Transportation Development OOrriieennttaattiioonn
21
◄◄ Traffic Volume Traffic Volume ►► ◄◄ V/C Ratio V/C Ratio ►►
M/CCarBusTruck
PCU - 1.0
1.0 - 1.21.2 - 1.51.5 -
V/C
Future Demand (2020 DoFuture Demand (2020 Do--Nothing Case)Nothing Case)
Urban Transportation Development Urban Transportation Development OOrriieennttaattiioonn
22
Road Planning PrinciplesRoad Planning Principles
117 projects with total length of 596km
• Remove bottlenecks including missing links and problem intersections.
• Segregate interprovincial and urban traffic and provide adequate interface measures.
• Build clear hierarchy (primary, secondary, tertiary) and ring and radial roads.
• Further improve technical standards for roads and road facilities (safety, efficiency, beautification).
• Establish more effective mechanisms for road development (resettlement, integrated land use, networking, funding).
Urban Transportation Development Urban Transportation Development OOrriieennttaattiioonn
23
Road ProjectsRoad Projects
Primary Road Secondary Road
◄◄ CrossCross--sectionssections ►►
Project Cost (Mill. US$)
Construction Cost
Earth Works/ Inter-
change
Bridge
Express Way
21 65 0 47 2 114
Urban Primary
260 884 1,356 2,165 342 4,747
Urban Secondary
189 253 0 1,761 219 2,233
Total 470 1,202 1,356 3,973 563 7,094
Land Cost
Com-pensa-
tionCost
Total
Proj. Total
Length (km)
◄◄ Estimated Project CostsEstimated Project Costs ►►
Urban Transportation Development OrientationUrban Transportation Development Orientation
• Urban growth management
• Traffic demand• Network
configuration• Resettlement/Envi
ronmental constraints
• Cost recovery
Short term (2006 – 2010)Medium term (2011 – 2015)Long term (2015 – 2020)On-going
◄◄ Location of Road ProjectsLocation of Road Projects ►►
24
Road Development in HanoiRoad Development in Hanoi2005 2020
Length(km)
Density(km/km2)
Length(km)
Density(km/km2)
Tertiary 509 0.60
Urban Primary 363 0.43
Urban Secondary 257 0.30
Total 690 0.82 1,129 1.34
690 0.82
◄◄ Road Length and Road DensityRoad Length and Road Density ►►
◄◄ Road Density Road Density International Comparison International Comparison (HAIDEP 2020)(HAIDEP 2020) ►►
• Road density will be significantly improved with construction of 470 km of primary and secondary roads. (approximately 30 km per year for next 15 years)
• Tertiary roads must be constructed in accordance with urban development. A mechanism must be worked out that they are constructed primarily by developers
11.6
2.3 1.9 1.0
Urban Transportation Development Urban Transportation Development OOrriieennttaattiioonn
15.8
12
8.5
2.5
7.4
0.6
11.56
2.25 1.86 1 1.7
02468
1012141618
Tokyo
(Cen
ter)
Singap
ore
Bangk
ok (C
ity)
Bangk
ok (T
otal)
HCMC (Urba
n Core
)
HCMC (Tota
l)
Hanoi
(Urba
n Core
)
Hanoi
(Urba
n Frin
ge)
Hanoi
(Sub
urban
)
Hanoi
(Rura
l)Han
oi (Tota
l)
(%)
25
V/C Ratio Average Travel Speed
2020(PT share)
2020(PT share)
District2005
10% 30%
Ba Dinh
Hoan Kiem 0.52 0.86 0.72 25 18 22
Hai Ba Trung 0.48 0.81 0.73 29 24 28
Dong Da 0.72 0.96 0.83 16 17 22
Thanh Xuan 0.52 0.90 0.78 28 25 32
Cau Giay 0.38 0.85 0.68 38 25 32
Hoang Mai 0.44 0.91 0.79 29 27 35
Long Bien 0.76 1.11 0.94 18 15 21
Tu Liem 0.29 0.75 0.57 35 34 45
Soc Son 0.27 0.65 0.52 36 33 43
Gia Lam 0.42 0.98 0.89 37 24 26
Tay Ho
Thanh Tri
Dong Anh
0.63 1.10 0.87 27 13 23
Suburban 0.33 0.92 0.86 27 31 36
0.42 1.01 0.78 29 20 31 Rural
Urban Fringe
10% 30%
0.62 0.97 0.81 21 15 20
Urban Core
2005
1) PT= public transportV/C= volume capacity
Performance of Proposed Main Road NetworkPerformance of Proposed Main Road Network
• Future level of traffic services will be reasonable and roads are more effectively used for traffic
• However, if public transport is not adequately provided, the situation get worse, especially in the city center districts.
Urban Transportation Development Urban Transportation Development OOrriieennttaattiioonn
26
Bridges across the Red RiverBridges across the Red River
Traffic congestion on the bridges will be solved by raising public transportation share to 30%.The remaining congestion around Chuong Duong Bridge can be alleviated by setting a toll (e.g. US$ 1 per crossing).
Capacity(000 PCUs/day)
Traffic Volume (000 PCUs/day)
2020Theoretical Practical 2005
(Actual) Trend (PT share 10%)
PT share 30%
Thang Long 4 64 96 61 146 83
Nhat Tan(New) 6 110 166 - 127 109
Ring Road 4(New) 4 88 132 - 137 87
Total 14 263 394 61 410 279
Long Bien 2 18 27 23 55 129
Chuong Duong 4 77 116 123 213 149
Vinh Tuy(New) 6 110 166 - 112 103
Thanh Tri(New) 6 110 166 - 109 100
Ring Road(New) 4 88 132 - 85 80
Total 19 355 533 146 574 461
Total 33 618 927 207 984 740
East
North
Bridge No. of Lanes
Urban Transportation Development Urban Transportation Development OOrriieennttaattiioonn
2784
Comprehensive Road and Urban Area Development Comprehensive Road and Urban Area Development Practice in JapanPractice in Japan
Urban Transportation Development Urban Transportation Development OOrriieennttaattiioonn
28
Before
After
Urban Transportation Development Urban Transportation Development OOrriieennttaattiioonn
Example of a Comprehensive Area Development ApproachExample of a Comprehensive Area Development Approach
29
Opening Year of the Subway and Population in the City
Data source: UN (2004); http://osamuabe.ld.infoseek.co.jp
Metro is introduced in urban areas with populations of more or Metro is introduced in urban areas with populations of more or less 3 million.less 3 million.
UMRT DevelopmentUMRT DevelopmentWorld Experiences in Metro DevelopmentWorld Experiences in Metro Development
0
4000
8000
12000
1850 1900 1950 2000Year of sub-way (first) operation
City
pop
ulat
ion
('000
per
sons
)
Europe/USCIS/East EuropeAsiaLatin America/Africa
Calcutta
London
Budapest
Tokyo
Seoul
Beijing
Bangkok
Taipei
Teharan
Paris
30
Opening Year of First Metro and Vehicle Ownership Rate
Asian cities introduced metro even when vehicle Asian cities introduced metro even when vehicle ownership rates were relatively low.ownership rates were relatively low.
UMRT DevelopmentUMRT Development
31
Opening Year of First Subway and Per Capita GDP
Asian cities introduced subway at relatively lower Asian cities introduced subway at relatively lower levels of per capita GDP.levels of per capita GDP.
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
1850 1900 1950 2000Year of sub-way (first) operation
GD
P pe
r cap
ita (1
990
PPP
$)
Europe/USCIS/East EuropeAsiaLatin America/Africa
Calcutta
LondonBudapest Tokyo
Seoul
Beijing
Bangkok
Taipei
Teharan
Paris
UMRT DevelopmentUMRT Development
Data source: UN (2004); http://osamuabe.ld.infoseek.co.jp
32
• Introduction of metro in the early stage of urbanization, motorization. and economic development.
• Development of good network including feeder services by other public transport modes such as bus and taxi.
• Long-term commitment to development strategies including integrated urban development, funding and private sector participation, comprehensive traffic management, technical standards, and public support.
UMRT DevelopmentUMRT Development
Success FactorsSuccess Factors
33
● Station Coverage(within 10 minutes
walk)
Tokyo Singapore
UMRT DevelopmentUMRT Development
ExamplesExamples
34
UMRT forms the core system to a public transport-based city.
Formulate long-term network development plan and phased development strategy.Segregate interprovincial and urban traffic:
Complete ring route of Vietnam RailwayConvert existing VR routes within ring route into urban rail
Develop integrated system:Interprovincial and urban servicesAmong different linesFeeder servicesTechnical standardsUrban development
Involve private sector.
UMRT Development for HanoiUMRT Development for Hanoi
UMRT DevelopmentUMRT Development
• Strategies
35
Line Lengh(km)
System/Structure
1. Yen Vien – Ngoc Hoi 25
LRT, elevated using VNR but separate line in long-term
2. Hanoi Station – Ha Dong 15
3. Bac Co – Nhon 16
4. Hanoi Station –Noi Bai 25
LRT, metro, elevated using VNR (Nam Thang Long –Tang Mi) but new parallel line in long-term
5.Daewoo – TrungKinh – Hoa Lac 38
6. Giap Bat Station –Nam Thang Long 35
7. Buoi – Dong Anh –Soc Son 30
8. Co Bi – Uy No 26
Total 210
Depends on the development in the north of the Red River
LRT, Metro, elevated
LRT, Metro, elevated
MOT Plan on Urban Rail in Hanoi MOT Plan on Urban Rail in Hanoi
UMRT DevelopmentUMRT Development
36
Proposed UMRT (Urban Mass Rapid Trasit) Network Proposed UMRT (Urban Mass Rapid Trasit) Network
Urban RailUM
RT
Underground
Elevated
At-grade Total
BRT(At-
grade)Total
1 nil 12.9 21.6 34.5 nil 34.5
2 22.3 8.0 15.7 46 17 63
3 15.9 2.6 14.5 33 10 43
4 nil nil nil nil 52.5 52.5
Total 38.2 23.5 75.3 113.5 79.5 193
(km)
• Urban rail for high-demand corridors, BRT for low-demand corridors.
• Possible future upgrade of BRT to urban rail when demand increases.
• Underground system in the area within ring roads 2 and 3.
• Integration of adjoining urban areas (Ha Tay, Vinh Phuc, Bac Ninh, Hung Yen).1
1
1
2
2 2’
2’
3
3’
3
4
44
UMRT DevelopmentUMRT Development
37
Importance Importance of Integrated Urban Developmentof Integrated Urban Development• Efficient and effective use of
lands (control of urban sprawl).
• Reduction in urban infrastructure costs.
• Increase in convenience in access to various urban services.
• Creating new and diversified commercial/business development opportunities.
• Increase in UMRT ridership.
Mutually beneficial to urban and transport sectors.
Urbanized Area
UMRT LineIntermodal FacilitiesFeeder Service
UMRT DevelopmentUMRT Development
38
Estimated Traffic Demand (2020)
Estimated Demand Estimated Demand
UMRT Line
Length (km)
No. of Pax/day
(000)
TrafficDensity
(Pax-km/Route-km)
1 34.5 481 138,000
2 63 588 112,800
3 43 274 69,700
4 52.5 281 69,300
Total 193 1,624 98,100
Passenger/day25,000 50,000
• High demand to/from city center.
• Heavy demand on lines 1 and 2.
• Average travel distance: 11.3km.
• Demand increase with strict control of private vehicle use.
Cross-section Demand, 2020UMRT DevelopmentUMRT Development
39
Importance of Railway Network ConfigurationImportance of Railway Network ConfigurationNetwork Configuration in CBD • One line has little effect.
• Must be in the form of a network with convenient transfers.
• Wide coverage in CBD.• Efficient connection with
outer areas.
Multimodal/Interchange StationIntermediate Stations
Line 1
Line 3
Line 3
Line 1
Line 2
500m circle
Line 1
CBD
Extension along Growth Corridors
UMRT DevelopmentUMRT Development
40
• Smooth transfer• Feeder services• Integrated development
Rail+Bus+Port+commercial facilities (Hong Kong Station)
Busway+community centre(Curitiba, Brazil)
MRT+bus+public housing (Singapore)
UMRT DevelopmentUMRT Development
Multimodal Interchange Stations/ TerminalsMultimodal Interchange Stations/ Terminals
41
Available SystemsAvailable Systems
MRT in Singapore
LRT in San FranciscoLRT in Manila
Metro in Taipei
UMRT DevelopmentUMRT Development
Metro in Tokyo
42
Other Important Areas of ConcernOther Important Areas of Concern
Bus and other public transportation services Bus and other public transportation services (taxi, (taxi, xexe omom, , cyclocyclo))Traffic managementTraffic managementParkingParkingTraffic safetyTraffic safetyWater transportationWater transportationFreight transportationFreight transportationResettlement and ROW acquisitionResettlement and ROW acquisitionCapacity buildingCapacity building
43
Investment Plan aInvestment Plan annd Evaluationd Evaluation
Project CostProjects No. of
ProjectsLength
(km) US$ mil. %
Urban Roads 117 596 7,6821) 30.7
Traffic Safety 10 50 0.2
Public Transportation 2 3492) 1.4
Traffic Management 5 384 1.5
UMRT 6 193 5,619 22.5
Subtotal 140 14,084
Roads 20 2,691 4,6103) 18.4
Railway 12 2,582 10.3
Airport 2 3,540 14.2
Inland Waterway 5 178 0.7
Subtotal 39 10,910
TOTAL 179 24,994 100.0
REG
ION
AL
UR
BA
N
Source: HAIDEP Study Team.1) ROW cost = US$ 4.937 million.2) ROW cost = US$ 303 million.3) ROW cost = US$ 903 million.
Summary of TransportSummary of Transportationation Master Plan ProjectsMaster Plan Projects
44
Performance of Transportation Master PlanAreas Reachable within 30Areas Reachable within 30-- and 60and 60--Minute Travel to/from Minute Travel to/from HoanHoan KiemKiem Lake Lake
2005 2020 MP Network Scenario
2020
HAIDEP NetworkDo-Something (Committed)
Network With UMRT With UMRT & TDM
Average Travel Speed (km/h) 26.0 9.4 22.0 35.2
Average Volume/ Capacity Ratio 0.40 1.13 0.69 0.52
2005
Areas reachable within 30 minutes
Areas reachable within 60 minutes
2020Do-nothing Case
Investment Plan and EvaluationInvestment Plan and Evaluation
45
Funding Opportunity• Difficult to fund all projects by 2020 (US$ 14 billion for
urban projects).• Need for prioritization.• Need for expanding funding mechanism, user charges,
development benefits.
Investment Plan and EvaluationInvestment Plan and Evaluation
Preliminary Budget Envelope • Scenario 1:
GDP Growth = 8%/yr (2006-2020)% of transportation sector to GDP = 5%Possible budget envelope = US$ 5,500 mil.
• Scenario 2:% to transportation sector to GDP = 2.5%Possible budget envelope = US$ 2,750 mil.
46
Investment Requirement Possible Funding Source
$ 18.2 bil.
US$ 21.3 – 24.1 bil.
Conventional Fund Source
Private participation1)
TDM
Fuel Price
Area Licensing
Parking Fee
Vehicle Registration Car
M/C
Other works (30% of M/P)
Roads
Public Transport
Traffic Management/ Environment
Ongoing/Committed
0.5
(1.25% of GDP)
($300)
($3,000)
5.8M/C: VND3,500
Car: VND6,0009.3
3.4
0.8
4.2
M/C: VND7,500/entryCar: VND15,000 /entry1.5 times of existing
1) Urban Expressway: 40%, UMRTs: 40%, Secondary Roads: 20%
1.0
7.9
1.2
2.1
2.4
1.9-4.7
Investment Plan and EvaluationInvestment Plan and Evaluation
Funding Opportunities (Case of HCMC)
47
Project Prioritization• Prioritization is
important.• Adequate evaluation
criteria must be set.• Process must be clear
and transparent.
Identified Projects
Economic Analysis (EIRR)
Private Sector Participation (Income generation)
Promoting urban growth and desired landuse
Social and natural environment (resettlement)
Evaluation Criteria
Proposed Projects
GovernmentPolicy
Budget Envelop
Investment Plan and EvaluationInvestment Plan and Evaluation
48
Integrated/Coordinated Development• Regional, urban and local transport• Transport, urban/landuse and environment• Infrastructure and services• Public private role-sharing and inter-agency coordination.
Public transport development• Political will• Social awareness and support• Effective operation and management
Sector management capacity• Planning• Implementation and monitoring• Funding
Key to Sustainable Transport DevelopmentKey to Sustainable Transport Development
49
....thank you for your attention
END