Transfer modelling Hans Mattsson, Riga October 2004 Modelling 1.Core Cadastral Domain Model = static...
-
Upload
conrad-joseph -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Transfer modelling Hans Mattsson, Riga October 2004 Modelling 1.Core Cadastral Domain Model = static...
![Page 1: Transfer modelling Hans Mattsson, Riga October 2004 Modelling 1.Core Cadastral Domain Model = static (Lemmon, COST etc.) 2.Activity diagrams = dynamic.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649cc65503460f9498fc94/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Transfer modellingHans Mattsson, Riga October 2004
Modelling1. Core Cadastral Domain Model = static (Lemmon, COST etc.)2. Activity diagrams = dynamic (Sumrada, COST etc.) 3. “Mushroom model” = dynamic (Zevenbergen)
Current situation1. Static models do not show in what way rights are changed2. Activity diagrams do not show in what way rights are changed3. “Mushroom model” can be a starting point for modelling?
![Page 2: Transfer modelling Hans Mattsson, Riga October 2004 Modelling 1.Core Cadastral Domain Model = static (Lemmon, COST etc.) 2.Activity diagrams = dynamic.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649cc65503460f9498fc94/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Second draft of the Core Cadastral Domain Model
Source: Further Progress in the Development of a Core Cadastral Domain ModelChristiaan LEMMEN and Peter VAN OOSTEROM, The Netherlands
![Page 3: Transfer modelling Hans Mattsson, Riga October 2004 Modelling 1.Core Cadastral Domain Model = static (Lemmon, COST etc.) 2.Activity diagrams = dynamic.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649cc65503460f9498fc94/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Request for survey
Application for registration
Application for permission Authority issues permission
Completing the detailed report
Verification of application
Completing cadastral decision and file
Surveyor performs measurements
Cadastral registration Ownership registration
Surveyor investigates the case
cadastral decission
Application for permission
preparation
land policy control
registration
Cadastral registration Ownership registration
Completing cadastral decision and file
Treatment of rights
Surveyor investigates the case
Surveyor considers land policy
Owner gets cadastral copies
Slovenian subdivision Swedish subdivison
Surveyor performs measurements
Owner gets WHAT?????
Source: Rados, Ferlan, Mattsson and Vaskovich (forthcoming report, preliminary figure)
![Page 4: Transfer modelling Hans Mattsson, Riga October 2004 Modelling 1.Core Cadastral Domain Model = static (Lemmon, COST etc.) 2.Activity diagrams = dynamic.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649cc65503460f9498fc94/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Mushroom model
Source. Zevenbergen, 2004)
![Page 5: Transfer modelling Hans Mattsson, Riga October 2004 Modelling 1.Core Cadastral Domain Model = static (Lemmon, COST etc.) 2.Activity diagrams = dynamic.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649cc65503460f9498fc94/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Core entities model
S (subject related to the right/person)
R (ownership right)
Object (object for the right/land)
1. See also Zevenbergen, 2001, 20042. ULM terminology is not used in the presentation.
Ex. Sale
S1 S2
R
O
![Page 6: Transfer modelling Hans Mattsson, Riga October 2004 Modelling 1.Core Cadastral Domain Model = static (Lemmon, COST etc.) 2.Activity diagrams = dynamic.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649cc65503460f9498fc94/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Subdivision (assumption: no localized rights or restrictions)
S1
R
O
Original propertybefore decision
S1
R
S1
ORemaining
RNew
ONew
Properties after decision
+
Originalproperty
Remainingproperty
Newproperty
What happens on the land?
What happens on the person, right and object?
![Page 7: Transfer modelling Hans Mattsson, Riga October 2004 Modelling 1.Core Cadastral Domain Model = static (Lemmon, COST etc.) 2.Activity diagrams = dynamic.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649cc65503460f9498fc94/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Reallotment (assumption: no localized rights or restrictions)
Before decision
S1 S2
O1
R2
O2
After decision
+
What happens on the land?
What happens on the person, right and object?
Property 1(before)
Property 1(after)
Property 2(after)
R1
S1 S2
O1+part
R2+R1
O1-part
Property 2(before)
Part Part
![Page 8: Transfer modelling Hans Mattsson, Riga October 2004 Modelling 1.Core Cadastral Domain Model = static (Lemmon, COST etc.) 2.Activity diagrams = dynamic.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649cc65503460f9498fc94/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Lease (new lease is contracted for the whole property)
S
R
O
Original propertybefore lease
S LH
O
Lease right
Property with lease
Original propertyused by the owner
What happens on the land?
What happens on the person, right and object?
O
R-Lease right +
Original propertyused by leaseholder
![Page 9: Transfer modelling Hans Mattsson, Riga October 2004 Modelling 1.Core Cadastral Domain Model = static (Lemmon, COST etc.) 2.Activity diagrams = dynamic.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649cc65503460f9498fc94/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
HM hypotheses for “mushroom” modelling:
1. Dynamic transfer modelling must include rights2. Subjects, rights and objects must often be considered together3. Rights are more difficult to model than subjects and objects4. People modelling rights must be good in modelling and law5. Models shall be general and not covering everything6. The goal is to understand, not to show everything