Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers and Specialists Delaware Performance...
-
Upload
timothy-reese -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers and Specialists Delaware Performance...
Training Module 3
The DPAS II ProcessTraining for Teachers and
Specialists
Delaware Performance Appraisal System II
for Teachers and Specialists : Revised July 2011
1
Training Overview
2
Four separate modules:Module 1: Introduction to DPAS IIModule 2: DPAS II and the Delaware
FrameworkModule 3: The DPAS II Process
Conferences (pre- and post-observation)ObservationsWritten documents (Forms)Improvement PlansChallenges
Module 4: Component Five – Student Improvement
Materials for this modulePowerPoint PresentationDPAS II Guide for TeachersDPAS II Brochure for easy component
reference
3
Review
4
Teachers Specialists Administrators
Component 1 Planning & Preparation
Planning & Preparation
Vision & Goals
Component 2Classroom
Environment
Professional Practice & Delivery of Services
Culture of Learning
Component 3 InstructionProfessional
Collaboration & Consultation
Management
Component 4 Professional Responsibilities
Professional Responsibilities
Professional Responsibilities
Component 5 Student Improvement
Student Improvement
Student Improvement
Five Components of DPAS II
DPAS II: Process1. Student Growth Measures and Professional
Responsibilities Component 4 and 5 New beginning 2011-2012!
2. Pre-observation Conference Component 1, 2, 3, and 4
3. Observation Components 1, 2, 3, and 4
4. Post-observation Conference Components 1, 2, 3, and 4
5. Level of Performance Ratings1. Components 1, 2, 3, and 4
6. Formative Feedback Documentation Component 1, 2, 3, and 4
5
DPAS II Process, (continued)
7. Summative Evaluation Conference Component 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
8. Summative Evaluation Documentation Component 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Improvement Plans
The Challenge Process
6
What is new in the DPAS II Process in 2011?
7
Changes to the DPAS II process, beginning in the 2011-2012 school yearComponent 4 assessed throughout the
evaluation processUse of rubrics during the evaluation processAddition of “expectations” and definition of
recommendation versus expectation District administrator must meet with the
teacher during the challenge process
Student Growth MeasuresReplaces Goal Setting in previous version
of DPAS IIWill be discussed in detail in Training
Module 4
8
Professional ResponsibilitiesForm completed in FallDiscussions held during pre and post-
observation conferencesChanges to Professional Responsibilities
documentDiscussion during summative evaluation
conference
9
Pre-observationForm
Required for Novice Teachers and SpecialistsMay be waived for Experienced Teachers and
Specialists ONLY IF both the teacher or specialist and evaluator
agree
ConferenceRequired for all announced observations –
may not be waivedDoes not apply to unannounced observationsWhenever possible, held in teacher’s
classroom or specialist’s work area
10
Component 4 Discussions Throughout the ProcessFormPre-observation discussionsPost-observation discussionsReflection SheetSummative Conference
11
ObservationsAnnounced or UnannouncedLength of observationsFrequency of observationsLimitations on when observations may
occurEvidence collection
12
Post-observation ConferenceRequirementsTeacher Responsibilities
Lesson Reflection Template - New beginning 2011-2012! – OPTIONAL
Whenever possible, held in teacher’s classroom or specialist’s work area
Timing
13
Levels of Performance RatingCommon understanding between teacher or
specialist and the evaluatorTeachers are expected to use rubrics:
For reflection and self-assessment ANDTo develop a common understanding of his or her
own strengths and areas for improvementEvaluators are expected to use rubrics:
To focus pre-observation, post-observation, and summative conference discussions with teachers
To develop a common understanding of the teacher’s strengths and areas for improvement AND
As a guide to organize relevant evidence of teacher performance
14
Formative FeedbackRequirements and TimelineEvidenceFormative rating documentationHow do rubric levels translate to
Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory performance?
15
Summative EvaluationRequirements and TimelineEvidenceSummative ratingsSummative evaluation forms
16
Overall FeedbackCommendationsRecommendations and expectations
Difference between expectations and recommendations
How expectations are communicatedHow expectations are documentedHow evaluators assess teacher and specialist
performance toward expectation outcomesDocumenting completed expectations
Additional feedback
17
Challenge ProcessUsed when a teacher disagrees with the
evaluator’s assessmentDifferent from Grievance (can only grieve
process infractions)Must try to resolve difference with evaluator firstSubmit written challenge to evaluator’s supervisor
within 15 work days of receipt of the evaluation document
Within 15 work days the supervisor of the evaluator must meet with the teacher or specialist New beginning 2011-2012!
Within 15 work days the supervisor of the evaluator must issue a written decision
18
DOE monitoring of DPAS II documentation quality
Annual audit of DPAS II formative and summative evaluation documentsConducted by DOE staff in collaboration with LEA
Expert EvaluatorsAll information is strictly confidential – no
evaluation documents leave the site or are specifically referenced
Use of review criteria to ensure written evaluation documents provide Objective, specific, and relevant evidence of teacher
performance and areas for commendationSupportive, specific, and actionable guidance, including
timelines, for any recommendations and/or expectations to improve performance
19
Module completion1. Read Section III of the DPAS II Guide for Teachers2. Using DPAS II Guide for Teachers answer the
questions below– we recommend that you complete this work with an experienced peer or in a PLC.
What are my responsibilities during the evaluation process?
How often will I be observed this year? What level of practice do I need to reach in order to
receive a commendation? What is the difference between recommendations and
expectations? What are my responsibilities if my practice is not
satisfactory in one or more component?
Continue to Module 4, Component 5
20