Traceability of Marine LNG

44
Marine Technology and Standards Workshop October 16-17, 2017 October 16 17, 2017 Traceability of Marine LNG Traceability of Marine LNG Bunkering Measurements Thomas Kegel, William Johansen Colorado Engineering Experiment Station, Inc.

Transcript of Traceability of Marine LNG

Page 1: Traceability of Marine LNG

Marine Technology and Standards WorkshopOctober 16-17, 2017October 16 17, 2017

Traceability of Marine LNGTraceability of Marine LNG Bunkering Measurementsg

Thomas Kegel, William JohansenColorado Engineering Experiment Station, Inc.

Page 2: Traceability of Marine LNG

TopicsTopics

• LNG BunkeringLNG Bunkering• Bunkering sources

i d d• Primary standards• Traceability• System design

Page 3: Traceability of Marine LNG

Traditional LNG ApplicationsTraditional LNG Applications

• First refrigeration system: 1873First refrigeration system: 1873• First commercial plant: 1917

k h i• Peak shaving• Pipeline transport alternative 

Page 4: Traceability of Marine LNG

Al i i liAlternative to pipeline transport 

Page 5: Traceability of Marine LNG

LNG BunkeringLNG Bunkering

Page 6: Traceability of Marine LNG

BunkeringBunkering“the term bunker is generally applied to the storage of petroleum products in tanks, and the practice and business of refueling ships.” 

Originates from ship‐board coal bunkers

Page 7: Traceability of Marine LNG

First LNG fueled vessel, Glutra ferry, Norway, 2000

Page 8: Traceability of Marine LNG

Marine Fuel LNGMarine Fuel LNG 

• 2016: 77 vessels using LNG fuel mostly in2016: 77 vessels using LNG fuel, mostly in Norway

• 2022: 24 US (Jones Act) vessels• 2022: 24 US (Jones Act) vessels

Page 9: Traceability of Marine LNG

LNG Fuel DriversLNG Fuel Drivers

• Environmental regulationEnvironmental regulation• Cost and availabilityG li i• Geo‐politics 

Page 10: Traceability of Marine LNG

Environmental Control AreasEnvironmental Control Areas

Page 11: Traceability of Marine LNG

ECA SolutionsECA Solutions

• Scrubber system to remove sulfurScrubber system to remove sulfur• Dual fuel system, ECA vs non‐ECA

l f l• Natural gas fuel• Natural gas/diesel fuel mixture

Page 12: Traceability of Marine LNG

ECA SolutionsECA Solutions

Likely requires LNG measurementLikely requires LNG measurement • Natural gas fuel

l /di l f l i• Natural gas/diesel fuel mixture

Page 13: Traceability of Marine LNG

Bunkering SourcesBunkering Sources

Page 14: Traceability of Marine LNG
Page 15: Traceability of Marine LNG

“Current” LNG Bunkering SourcesCurrent  LNG Bunkering Sources

• Truck transfer (33%)Truck transfer (33%)• Portable storage container (17%)

i d k ( %)• Fixed storage tank (17%)• Barge transfer (33%)• Multi‐drop truck transfer

Page 16: Traceability of Marine LNG
Page 17: Traceability of Marine LNG

LNG TruckBunkeringg

Page 18: Traceability of Marine LNG

LNG BargeBunkeringg

Page 19: Traceability of Marine LNG

Portable Storage

Page 20: Traceability of Marine LNG

“Current” LNG Bunkering SourcesCurrent  LNG Bunkering Sources

Direct mass (static) traceabilityDirect mass (static) traceability• Truck transfer

bl i• Portable storage containerIndirect mass (dynamic) traceability• Fixed storage tank• Barge transferBarge transfer• Multi‐drop truck transfer

Page 21: Traceability of Marine LNG

Small Scale LNGSmall Scale LNG

Page 22: Traceability of Marine LNG

Primary StandardsPrimary Standards

Page 23: Traceability of Marine LNG

Primary StandardsPrimary Standards

• Gravimetric vs volumetricGravimetric vs volumetric• Static vs dynamic

Page 24: Traceability of Marine LNG

Static Gravimetric StandardStatic Gravimetric Standard

“Startup” Operation

Page 25: Traceability of Marine LNG

Static Gravimetric StandardStatic Gravimetric Standard

“Calibrate” Operation

Page 26: Traceability of Marine LNG

Dynamic Gravimetric StandardDynamic Gravimetric Standard

Page 27: Traceability of Marine LNG

Dynamic Volumetric StandardDynamic Volumetric Standard

Page 28: Traceability of Marine LNG

Flow Provers

Page 29: Traceability of Marine LNG

Static Volumetric Standards

Page 30: Traceability of Marine LNG

Current Primary StandardsCurrent Primary Standards

• NIST LN2 SystemNIST LN2 System• VSL LNG SystemC i l i d fi ld• Commercial cryogenic prover under field test

Page 31: Traceability of Marine LNG

NIST SystemNIST System

• Built in 1968Built in 1968• Operates with liquid nitrogenS f d l i h G• Safer and less expensive than LNG

• Reynolds number overlap• 1 – 10 kg/s, 0.5% uncertainty• Dynamic gravimetric standardDynamic gravimetric standard• Operated by CEESI, owned by NIST

Page 32: Traceability of Marine LNG

VSL SystemVSL System

• VSL: Dutch national measurement instituteVSL: Dutch national measurement institute• Recently built (2010?)O i h li id l• Operates with liquid natural gas

• 1.3 – 4.5 kg/s, 0.12 – 0.15% uncertainty• Static gravimetric standard, inline 3‐way diverter valve, no free jet, j

Page 33: Traceability of Marine LNG

TraceabilityTraceability

Page 34: Traceability of Marine LNG

Typical TraceabilityTypical Traceability

Page 35: Traceability of Marine LNG

Typical TraceabilityTypical Traceability

Page 36: Traceability of Marine LNG

Typical TraceabilityTypical Traceability

Page 37: Traceability of Marine LNG

Typical TraceabilityTypical Traceability

Page 38: Traceability of Marine LNG

Typical TraceabilityTypical Traceability

Page 39: Traceability of Marine LNG

System DesignSystem Design

Page 40: Traceability of Marine LNG

Flowmeter ConsiderationFlowmeter Consideration

• Turbine metersTurbine meters– Traditional cryogenic meters

• Newer technology• Newer technology– Coriolis, low flow– Ultrasonic, high flow– No moving parts– Mass vs volume– Pressure drop– Transient response

Page 41: Traceability of Marine LNG

Density and Heating ValueDensity and Heating Value

• Varies with pressure temperatureVaries with pressure, temperature, composition

• Requires sampling• Requires sampling• Requires state equation• Can vary with time

– boil of gas (BOG)– Multiple feeds into storage

Page 42: Traceability of Marine LNG

Some FlowratesSome Flowrates

Important for flowmeter rangeImportant for flowmeter range• Highway truck refuel: 0.8 kg/s

k i b k /• Bunkering barge: 1.1 kg/s• LNG delivery truck pump: 0.3 – 1.8 kg/s• Locomotive refuel: 14.6 kg/s• Ferry terminal bunkering: 53 kg/sFerry terminal bunkering: 53 kg/s• LNG carrier cargo load: 670 – 2000 kg/s

Page 43: Traceability of Marine LNG

Some UncertaintiesSome Uncertainties

Very rough estimates:Very rough estimates:• 40 ft ISO container, mass discharge: 0.44%S ll i di h 0 8 %• Smaller container, mass discharge: 0.81%

• LNG cargo volume: 0.20% ‐ 0.54%• LNG density: 0.46%• NIST system: 0 5% (0 18% target)NIST system: 0.5% (0.18% target)• VSL system: 0.12% ‐ 0.15% (0.10% target)

Page 44: Traceability of Marine LNG

SummarySummary

• Natural gas use is expandingNatural gas use is expanding• Liquefaction is used for storage and transport

G li i• Many LNG applications are new:– Measurement methods are under development– Direct vs indirect traceability to mass– We can learn from traditional flow measurement