Towardsanintelligententerpriseecosystem
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
directing-intelligence -
Category
Data & Analytics
-
view
46 -
download
0
Transcript of Towardsanintelligententerpriseecosystem
![Page 1: Towardsanintelligententerpriseecosystem](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100800/58ef2fec1a28ab77018b45b3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Towardsanintelligententerpriseecosystem](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100800/58ef2fec1a28ab77018b45b3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
www.directingintelligence.com– [email protected]
1. Introduction
Today an enterprise is evolving into a complex economic, social and business environment, co existing with
suppliers, producers, competitors, other stakeholders and customers. Global trends of production and
distribution in one hand, business dependence on technology evolution on the other (Internet of things,
Cloud and Smart Systems) are leading into an era where people, machines, devices, sensors, and businesses
must all be connected and able to interact with each other.
A new paradigm of doing business is necessary, an Intelligent Enterprise Ecosystem that will offer an
operational and profitable symbiotic relationship between an enterprise, technology, its environment and
knowledge generated by (and influencing) this relationship.
2. Assessing Alignment
For a successful Intelligent Enterprise Ecosystem the alignment of business, technology and knowledge is
sine qua non. The history of theory-building around the concept of alignment is still young and has only
been going on approximately 15 years. The most widespread and accepted framework of alignment (even if
does not include knowledge and by extension analytics as an integral part of business) was proposed by
Henderson and Venkatraman in 1993.
This theoretical construct, also known as the strategic alignment model (SAM), describes the phenomenon
along two dimensions. The dimension of strategic fit differentiates between external focus, directed towards
the business environment, and internal focus, directed towards administrative structures.
The other dimension of functional integration separates business and IT. Altogether, the model defines four
domains that have to be harmonized in order to achieve alignment.
![Page 3: Towardsanintelligententerpriseecosystem](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100800/58ef2fec1a28ab77018b45b3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
www.directingintelligence.com– [email protected]
3. Overcoming Problems in Alignment Implementation
While trying to align technology with the business, many enterprises experience a quite fuzzy target. With
what ‘business’ should technology and knowledge models align? According to the ‘Strategic Alignment
Model’, a first answer should be with the business strategy. In practice business strategy is not often a clear
target following a linear model allowing a blueprint with guidelines.
An enterprise must be able to be responsive to developments in its environment. The company strategy is
therefore not a destiny that is ever reached. In reality strategy provides a trip, not an Ithaca. On the second
level of the Strategic Alignment Model, the alignment is aimed at the business processes and organization.
The organization provides only limited information about the business requirements. It is focused on
hierarchical structure, but not on information content. An additional problem is that in many enterprises the
organization structure is not very stable. Departments and job titles change frequently. The business
processes in the other hand tend to be more stable. In the development of technology applications they
provide an important basis for the analysis of the information requirements. A problem however is that there
are multiple views of the business processes, all with different goals and different content.
As a result of this, most IT Departments development projects will build their own process models
according to their own modeling conventions. And every Business Intelligence project will be standing on
some business requirements and on IT capabilities, with no global strategy.
![Page 4: Towardsanintelligententerpriseecosystem](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100800/58ef2fec1a28ab77018b45b3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
www.directingintelligence.com– [email protected]
4. A New Business/Intelligence Alignment Model
Based on 20 years of experience, I propose a new model that incorporates SAM model into a larger,
including knowledge creation and management, knowledge generated especially from the web. This new
model is defined in two axes : Content Base Axe and Process Based Axe.
4.1 Content-Based Axe
Competition goes beyond established industry rivals to include four other competitive forces as well:
customers, suppliers, potential entrants, and substitute products. This market-based view of strategy is
interested in the resources businesses have and treats their behavior as a “black box”. Competitive strategy
determines how the organization gains an advantage over its rivals within chosen market positions. Content
Based Axe is critical as it is the one generating profits for an enterprise
4.2 Process-Based Axe
The alignment models corresponding to the process stream of strategic management focus on the dynamism
of business–technology alignment, the co-evolutionary development of both strategy and IT strategies and
on the social dimension of alignment. These models highlight the importance of the process in which
internal politics, organizational culture, managerial cognition and skills help achieve and maintain high
alignment.
4.3 Strategy As Practice
Targeting efficiency above all, the strategy-as-practice approach understands practice as being “closer” to
reality and delivering a “more accurate” description of the real world phenomena than formal theories
populated by multivariate analyses of firm or industry level factors. Sometimes is also necessary to start
with a strategy focusing to partial business objectives such as loyalty and acquisition, stock management
optimization, etc... Based on this consideration I propose the following methodology.
![Page 5: Towardsanintelligententerpriseecosystem](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100800/58ef2fec1a28ab77018b45b3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
www.directingintelligence.com– [email protected]
5. Intelligent Enterprise Ecosystem. Methodology
Directing Intelligence in Enterprise Ecosystem methodology is deployed through the following ontological
values that constitute 5 hierarchical levels :
Business Blueprint. The ability to anticipate unpredictable internal and external changes : ÷ Business
strategy axes description, KPIs, governance, operational models. ÷ Identification of change drivers and their
impact on key business processes. ÷ Implementation planning through existing or new information systems
and data analytics.
Open Architecture. The guide and reference for collaboration of people involved at all levels, for present
and future projects. ÷ Architectural planning of applications and systems to be deployed, their interactions
and their relationships to the core business processes of the enterprise.
Shared Values and Communication. The common language inside an enterprise that permits an effective
communication between business and technology people. ÷ Capturing critical business information, without
being tied to specific technologies. ÷ Modeling of the logical software and hardware environment that is
required to support the deployment of new strategies.
Network of People, Systems and Knowledge. Shared knowledge makes people from different departments
to work together, using the same information. ÷ Building innovative, interconnected, collaborative and
evolutionary analytics that share and exchange data, content and services within the ecosystem.
Enterprise Open to World. Interconnection of an enterprise with the world through all devices ÷ Provision
of the connectivity infrastructure and integration of individual applications and devices into the Enterprise or
Community Ecosystem, based on interoperability standards.
![Page 6: Towardsanintelligententerpriseecosystem](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100800/58ef2fec1a28ab77018b45b3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
www.directingintelligence.com– [email protected]
6. Why artificial intelligence
Incorporating the contribution of game theory and decision-making processes, gradually an autonomous
body of research was created : Artificial Intelligence, which exceeds computer science, as it is the only one
that allows the approach and study of complex adaptive systems, such as human behavior.
At the borders of economics, computer science, psychology, sociology, semantics and logic, artificial
intelligence was based on heuristic search, the selective trial and error research.
The development of this science has made possible to have approximate representations of real situations,
more accurate than those generated by operations research algorithms. Being able to face any situation that
could be represented symbolically (verbally or mathematically through diagrams),
Artificial Intelligence allows to extend the use of computers to more complex problems and less structured,
including the most sophisticated forms of reasoning, unique privilege to human crisis till this moment.
Complex problems and unstructured data as the chaotic information flow provided by the web (among other
things).
But there is another "because" for artificial intelligence usage apart their ability to make sense of the mess of
available data. Their ability to be trained, be “educated” by each enterprise to select, analyze and present
useful information to serve business strategy. Their ability to evolve in parallel with each enterprise.