Topics for brainstorming raised by agenda of EC Understanding in the context of the ECI...
-
Upload
beatrix-hoover -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Topics for brainstorming raised by agenda of EC Understanding in the context of the ECI...
EUROPEAN EXPERIENCES IN BENCHMARKING WATER SERVICES
INPUT FOR BRAINSTORM SESSION MULTI-STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUE SEPTEMBER 9TH 2014, BRUSSELS
Benchmarking is an established practice to improve service for the citizens
• ECI1 aims to secure established practice– “Promote benchmarking for water services operators
similar to long standing practices in the Netherlands and Germany.”2
• EC-communication3 aims to increase public information - e.g. based on benchmarking
Successful service for the citizens
Voluntary bench-marking
Technical standards
Efficient organization
Dialogue + public
information Decisions close to
customers
1http://www.right2water.eu 2ECI (2014)3Communication COM(2014)177 final
20 years of benchmarking experience can support EC-initiative1 for better information
Better informa-
tion to
empower citizens
• IWA perfomance indicators
• Individual benchmarking assessment systems
Standardised performance indicator catalogues
• Voluntariness, confidentiality
• Reliability, quality, customer service, sustainability, efficiency
Guidelines of an established management tool
• Anonymous, aggregated, interpreted by experts
• Existing reports, defined scope of performance indicators
Standards for public information
1Communication COM(2014)177 final
Principles of its success
• “Performance assessment and performance improvement ...[are] consecutive components of benchmarking.”1
• Confidentiality facilitates learning • Voluntariness supports motivation and
management focus • Different performance areas (e.g. reliability,
quality, customer service, sustainability, and economic efficiency) have to be balanced
1Cabrera et al. (2011)
Recent surveys state clearly: Incorporation of management is success factor
• “Successful benchmarking is connected with the aims and strategies of a company”1
• „…data collection and monitoring (for regulatory reporting) …does not necessarily get the best results for customers… We propose that companies develop their own systems.“2
1Moeller et al. (2012) and Bertzbach et al. (2012) (Survey of 15 years of benchmarking in German wastewater services)2OFWAT (2012) (Proposals on new regulatory compliance in UK)
“Need for information on the part of politics and the public is generally welcomed”1
1ATT et al. (2002), Joint declaration on benchmarking of German Water Sector Associations2EEA (2014)3ATT et al. (2011)
Aggregated, anonymous data are published, when interpreted and analyzed by experts and when asked for, e.g. • Joint initiative on sharing performance
indicators with EEA• Profile of German Water Sector• Various public reports of benchmarking
projects• ...
Dialogue on scope of public information can build on different experiences
• Scope of benchmarking of water services is defined by benchmarking initiatives.
• Scope of performance indicators to be used for public information are defined already in some initiatives, e.g.:– EEA-report on knowledge bases (2014)1
– Defined industry performance indicators for profile of German Water industry (2013)2
– EWA “Key performance indicators for European wastewater services” (2009)3
1EEA (2014)2see Annex3EWA (2009)
Suggested way forward
• For better information of citizens build on established standards– Defined performance indicators– Guidelines of a management tool– Standards of public information
• Use existing know-how and experts
Scope of public information - German wastewater performance indicators1
1Defined performance indicators for anonymous, aggregated public information (Schulz, Graf (2013))
KQA01 [%]KSA01 [a] KNA65mod. [%] KKA01 [%] KWA01
[EUR / p.e+J4]
KQA05 [%] KSA05 [%] KNA80mod. [kWh/p.e] KKA10 [n / property] KWA70 [%]
KQA10 [%] [%] KNA85 [%] KWA100mod. [EUR / p.e]
KQA35 yes/ no KNA90 [h / FTE] KWA115mod. [EUR / p.e]
KNA100mod. [n / FTE]
KTA50 [m³ / p.e] KTA30 [m / p.e] KTA40 [%]
Working days lost through illness and accident per
employee
Treatment performance COD
Treatment performance Ntot
Treatment performance Ptot
Quality Reliability
Average sewer age
Rate of sewer length requiring rehabilitation
Inspection rate
SustainabilityPipeline rehabilitation (annual
sewer renewal rate) (10 years)
Specific energy consumption wastewater treatment
Energy recovery rate [%]
Continuation and further training measures
Management systems
Specific operating expenditure wastewater collection and transport
Specific operating expenditure wastewater
treatment
Customer Service
Level of connection for the sewer system
Complaints about wastewater disposal per service
connection
Economic Efficiency
Specific total expenditure wastewater disposal
Cost coverage (EU WFD) wastewater disposal [%]
Specific total wastewater quantity (own WWTP) Specific total sewer length
Average degree of utilisation wastewater treatment plants
Context Information