Tom Rush: Full Speed Ahead – Elmore Magazine
10
ADVERTISEMENT Search Elmore NEWS PREMIERES REVIEWS FEATURES CONTESTS PHOTOS MERCH ADVERTISE ADVERTISEMENT MUSIC NEWS Tom Rush: Full Speed Ahead Now in the 53rd year of his Performing Career, the folk singer is Feeling as Creative as ever Features Music News | December 8th, 2016 Tom Rush plays Mountain Stage, Charleston WV in 2009, photo by Brian Blauser By Mike Cobb Tom Rush has been performing as a folk singer since the mid 1960s. He is well known both for his original music and for covering classics by contemporaries such as Joni Mitchell. Nancy Young from Gatehouse News Service said of Rush, “His voice is still molasses, smoke and licorice; his fingers still coax magic and thunder from every guitar string, and he’s as engaging a storyteller as he ever was.” Now in his sixth decade of delighting audiences with his gift for storytelling through song, Rush is still going strong. He’ll play at 7:30pm this Friday, December 9th, at The Schimmel Center in New York City, where he’ll be supported by Matt Nakoa and Seth Glier. In advance of the special showcase, we spoke to the legend about Club 47, his recent burst of creativity, teasing songs out of the ether and helping “whippersnappers” like Nakoa and Glier reach a wider audience. Read the conversation below, and head HERE to enter to win a pair of tickets to Friday night’s show. Elmore Magazine: How did you get started in music, and who were some of your early influences?
-
Upload
michael-cobb -
Category
Documents
-
view
78 -
download
0
Transcript of Tom Rush: Full Speed Ahead – Elmore Magazine
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
Search Elmore
NEWS PREMIERES REVIEWS FEATURES CONTESTS PHOTOS MERCH ADVERTISE
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
MUSIC NEWS
Tom Rush: Full Speed AheadNow in the 53rd year of his Performing Career, the folksinger is Feeling as Creative as everFeatures Music News | December 8th, 2016
Tom Rush plays Mountain Stage, Charleston WV in 2009, photo by Brian Blauser
By Mike Cobb
Tom Rush has been performing as a folk singer since the mid 1960s. He is well knownboth for his original music and for covering classics by contemporaries such as JoniMitchell. Nancy Young from Gatehouse News Service said of Rush, “His voice is stillmolasses, smoke and licorice; his fingers still coax magic and thunder from everyguitar string, and he’s as engaging a storyteller as he ever was.”
Now in his sixth decade of delighting audiences with his gift for storytelling throughsong, Rush is still going strong. He’ll play at 7:30pm this Friday, December 9th, at TheSchimmel Center in New York City, where he’ll be supported by Matt Nakoa and SethGlier. In advance of the special showcase, we spoke to the legend about Club 47, hisrecent burst of creativity, teasing songs out of the ether and helping“whippersnappers” like Nakoa and Glier reach a wider audience.
Read the conversation below, and head HERE to enter to win a pair of tickets to Fridaynight’s show.
Elmore Magazine: How did you get started in music, and who were some of yourearly influences?
Tom Rush by Mark J. Smith
Tom Rush: I landed in Cambridge, MA to go to college in the fall of 1959, and it was justa hotbed of folk music. I was already playing the guitar a bit, and I already liked folkmusic. The flagship of the fleet was Club 47, which was one block from my dorm room,so I got sucked into that. I got a little radio station at Harvard, would recruit localmusicians for the show, and got into it that way. I graduated with a degree in EnglishLiterature, which isn’t really much use in the job market unless you’re a teacher, but Icouldn’t be a teacher because my dad was, and I had to be a rebel. But people werepaying me to sing, which I still find amazing, and I figured, I’ll just keep doing this until Ifigure out what I’d like to do. Here we are 53 years later, and I’m still trying to figureout what I want to do.
EM: Well, it seems like you’ve found it!
TR: I’m very happy with. I make a good living doing something I love to do, so I’mfortunate.
EM: Was there much of a folk scene on campus at that time or more in and aroundtown– or both things?
TR: It was more around town in the coffee houses. Again, The Club 47 was the flagship;they brought in the old timers. You could go into this 80 seat room and hear the CarterFamily, Bill Monroe, Flatt and Scruggs and a lot of the old blues guys. I rememberthinking at the time that this seems normal, but I know that it’s not. Boston’s a bigcollege town, and there were a lot of people around learning guitar for fun. There wasreally something extraordinary going on. It was mostly an amateur scene, in theoriginal, positive sense of the word, people doing it because they wanted to, not forcareers necessarily. The New York scene was more professionally oriented for peoplewho wanted to get matching shirts and go on the road.
EM: Did you have a sense of how the two scenes compared?
TR: There was a lot of cross pollination. New Yorkers would come up here. Judy Collinsand Dylan were at The Club 47, and I and some others would go down to New York.But two of the pillars of the folk community were a typewriter repairman and apsychopharmacologist who had no plans to build a career in music, they just lovedplaying the mandolin and the banjo respectively and they were really good at it, butthey didn’t want to be professionals. The music was just for the fun of it.
EM: Who amongst your contemporaries did you feel kinship with?
TR: A guy named Eric Von Schmidt, who was in my mind the mainspring of theCambridge folk scene. He was a little older the most of us, a great writer anddiscoverer of traditional songs from The Library of Congress recordings, and he was avisual artist. He was a major character– a major influence on me. I’m very influenced,so it’d be a very long list. And a lot of the blues guys who came through town, I foundabsolutely fascinating, partly because I was an English major and loved what they didwith syntax. People like Sleep John Estes, Bukka White and Jesse Fuller were all justastoundingly exciting to me.
EM: Your early material was greatlyinfluenced by the music of lowlandScotland and Appalachia? I’ve always found that connection fascinating. How didyou initially tap into those genres, and how do you think the music of Great Britainmanifests itself in American folk music?
TR: Well, the tradition was transplanted in the form of actual people who came overand populated the Appalachian Mountains. There were pockets of people who werestill speaking the dialects of Scotland. So the music came over and survived with thepeople. Having studied it and being an academic on one level, I define folk music as
The Rolling Stones …
$16.89
The Rolling Stones …
$25.49
Zoom H4N …$199.99
Zoom H5 …$269.99
being traditional music handed down from generation to generation. Songs like“Barbara Allen,” there’s no one correct version, there’s a thousand different variants,and they’re all equally valid. You learned it from your grandmother, and maybe if youcouldn’t remember a verse or a line, you’d make up something to go in its place. So thesongs were living things really growing and propagating. This really only happens inilliterate populations, because once people learn how to write, then they write it downand it doesn’t change anymore. It becomes fixed. Anyway, I think the music came overwith actual living people and grew and flourished in certain populations, especiallyisolated ones.
The same thing happened with the blues. There are a lot of floating verses; they’d takewhat was the best and most compelling. So after a couple of generations you’d havesome really good stuff, because it’s just the stuff that’s memorable that survives.
EM: How do you think things transformed from being the music that immigrantsbrought to being uniquely American? I guess it was that process of handing down,and as you say, keeping the best?
TR: Right, and the songs would also grow to be more relevant to people’s current lives;they’d add lines that had to do with, maybe, who was president at the time. So thesongs were organic things; they would grow and multiply. It was interesting inCambridge to have a bunch of Harvard students sitting around singing about how rough itwas in the coal mines, but we figured we could make up in sincerity what we lacked inauthenticity. [Laughs]
EM: I know you live in Massachusetts and have a farm in New Hampshire. How doesphysical location affect your songwriting?
TR: I think being in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, the physical presence of the mountainsand the sage plains and the wildlife is really imposing. I think what’s more important isthe culture of the community in which you’re living. It’s always been striking, Mike, thatadjoining towns can have very different personalities. Did you ever notice that?
EM: Most definitely!
TR: It’s a curious thing. I used to play a club for two weeks, same town, same time ofday, same demographics, but the audience from night to night would be totallydifferent. I’m not sure why that happens, but it’s a curious thing. But that hasabsolutely nothing to do with what we’re talking about. [Laughs]
EM: Well, it ties into performance and reading your audience, which, as an aspiringsinger/songwriter is something I’ve always wondered about.
TR: My M.O. is actually to visualize the audience as a single person; sometimes it’s a bit of aschizophrenic person, but in the first few songs I’m trying to figure out who this person is,what they like, and what buttons to push to get them engaged. And then for the rest of thenight I’m playing to that person. There’s always one or two people who aren’t with theprogram, talking, yelling out requests for songs I never recorded. Though that doesn’thappen very much; it’s more likely songs that I don’t remember. [Laughs]
EM: I imagine as you travel the country and the world, you pick up on differentenergies from the audience. How do you see things these days given the extremepolarization of recent politics and the outcome of all that? Are there places whereyou feel that your music resonates more than others?
TR: My home base is really the Northeast, from Bangor down to Washington, D.C.,because it has the highest concentration of colleges here. When I was starting out, itwas the college audiences I was playing to. I go to the Midwest, the Northwest, Floridaon a regular basis. I don’t do much in the south except Atlanta and Asheville. I think ithas to do with the college population. Most of my crowd is college educated, so that’s
Tom Rush by Mark J. Smith
kind of the thread.
In terms of the politics, I try to create kind of a little oasis from the problems of theworld. So I don’t tend to get political, because I really don’t want to remind people ofhow much things suck. I’d rather give them a little holiday from all the turmoil. On theother hand, there are times when I just can’t help myself and have to comment onsomething. I’ve been saying lately that there are aspects of the recent election cyclethat make you realize we really have to spend more on education. You can make ofthat what you will. There are people in the audience who will either agree or disagreewith me if I were to do that, so why go there?
EM: And I suppose it’s also a risk if songsare overly topical. It locks it into a place
and time. A song can have a longer lasting appeal if it’s not as topical.
TR: Well, the preachy songs don’t work, because you’re either preaching to the choir orthose who aren’t going to be converted regardless. But this is where the genius ofWoody Guthrie shines through. I can take a song like “Plane Crash At Los Gatos” andanybody can relate to it because it humanizes tragedy. Once you put a face and a nameon a problem, then people can relate to it and then maybe start thinking about what’s atstake in this particular issue.
EM: Excellent point.
TR: Also check out a version by Sweet Honey In The Rock.
EM: I just saw Shawn Colvin perform with Steve Earle at Town Hall in New York Cityon Monday night, which was a really great. I know you’ve worked with her and havehelped cultivate new talent. What sparks your interest in newer performers?
TR: I started doing these shows some years ago in the ’80s. I called them Club 47Concerts, in reference to the coffee house where I got my start. I try to make them amix of established artists and newcomers, but nobody’s heard of them yet. It givesthem a platform to launch from. It’s very hard to work your way out of the houseconcert, small club circuit into the wider stage.
The show at The Schimmel Center has two whippersnappers on it. Matt Nakoa, who Iencountered in the studio, sings like an angel, is monster keyboard player and writesgreat songs. He’s got classic, blues, rock ‘n’ roll chops and anything you can mention hecan play almost better than anyone you’ve ever heard. And he’s cute. So the ladies tellme. Why I get this guy onstage with me, I don’t know. And there’s another kid namedSeth Glier, who’s equally talented, and will be appearing with sax player Joe Nearny.They’ll be doing their own things as well; it should be a very interesting evening. Tohave both of them onstage is very exciting.
EM: Where do you find inspiration these days?
TR: Oh, it’s all over the place. I don’t actually know where the songs come from. I find Ihave to put my brain in neutral and see what drifts by. Very often things just arrivewhen I’m half asleep, or not paying attention, or thinking about something elsealtogether. Some little bit of melody or a line or two will float by, and if I have thepresence of mind, I’ll grab a pen or a phone and record the melody, because theyevaporate very quickly if you don’t do that. And if I take that little snippet and play withit for a while, it reveals itself more fully, and then I can figure out—oh, that’s what thenext chord should be. For me, it’s like trying to tune in a distant radio station that kind offades in and out. My feeling is that the song already exists, I just try to tease it out of itsdimension into this dimension. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t.
EM: What comes first, words or melody?
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
December 15th, 2016A Music Tour Without Music
December 15th, 2016Mike Zito Makes Blues
December 14th, 2016Stream Weep and Willow’sLayered, Loving Debut EP
December 14th, 2016WOLF!
TR: There’s no hard & fast rule, but usually a snippet of melody, or it could be a fewwords that imply a melody. I try to develop the music part ahead of the words, on thetheory that there are a lot of great songs out there with dumb words, but there are nogreat songs with dumb music. Music is something you feel; the words are somethingyou have to think about. Feeling is an instant connection, whereas the thinking parttakes a while. It’s all about feeling and connecting emotionally with another humanbeing.
EM: How do you think your approach and style has evolved over time?
TR: It’s gotten simpler, and I mean that in a good way. I recently did this, and audiencesseem to like it a lot, especially if it’s fun. Having said that, I also wrote a pretty heavy,philosophical song recently called “Voices”; the audience tends to sit there when it’sover, which I take as emotional applause.
I’ve actually been writing quite a bit lately; I think I could make an album entirely of mystuff, which would be really interesting. I’ve never done that. I really enjoy otherpeople’s songs– it’s essential when doing that to do them in a different way. But I’venever written so many songs in a fairly short period of time. I think I might go down toNashville and record an entire album.
EM: To what do you attribute the recent surge of creativity?
TR: I’m not sure… life has been kind of stressful for the last couple of years. Maybe ithas to do with escapism from the real world and the need to bury myself in my ownlittle musings.
For more information about Tom Rush, visit his website or connect with him on Facebook.
SPREAD THE NEWS!
Facebook 23 Twitter Google
RELATED STORIES
GOT SOMETHING TO SAY?
ADVERTISE SUBSCRIBE LINKS ABOUT PRIVACY JOBS CONTACT
©2016 Elmore Magazine. All rights reserved.
