TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers InvestmentWorth Investment Worth.
TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.
-
Upload
diane-owens -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
0
description
Transcript of TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.
![Page 1: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
TM 661Engineering Economics
forManagers
Break Even &Sensitivity
![Page 2: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
MotivationSuppose that by investing in a new information system, management believes they can reduce inventory costs. Your boss asks you to figure out if it should be done.
![Page 3: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
MotivationSuppose that by investing in a new information system, management believes they can reduce inventory costs. After talking with software vendors and company accountants you arrive at the following cash flow diagram.
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
25,000
i = 15%
![Page 4: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
MotivationSuppose that by investing in a new information system, management believes they can reduce inventory costs. After talking with software vendors and company accountants you arrive at the following cash flow diagram.
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
25,000
NPW = -100 + 25(P/A,15,5) = -16,196
i = 15%
![Page 5: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
MotivationSuppose that by investing in a new information system, management believes they can reduce inventory costs. After talking with software vendors and company accountants you arrive at the following cash flow diagram.
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
25,000
NPW = -100 + 25(P/A,15,5) = -16,196
i = 15%
![Page 6: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
MotivationBoss indicates $25,000 per year savings is too low & is based on current depressed market. Suggests that perhaps $40,000 is more appropriate based on a more aggressive market.
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
40,000
![Page 7: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
MotivationBoss indicates $25,000 per year savings is too low & is based on current depressed market. Suggests that perhaps $40,000 is more appropriate based on a more aggressive market.
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
40,000
NPW = -100 + 40(P/A,15,5) = 34,086
![Page 8: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
MotivationBoss indicates $25,000 per year savings is too low & is based on current depressed market. Suggests that perhaps $40,000 is more appropriate based on a more aggressive market.
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
40,000
NPW = -100 + 40(P/A,15,5) = 34,086
![Page 9: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
MotivationTell your boss, new numbers indicate a go. Boss indicates that perhaps he was a bit hasty. Sales have fallen a bit below marketing forecast, perhaps a 32,000 savings would be more appropriate
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
32,000
![Page 10: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
MotivationTell your boss, new numbers indicate a go. Boss indicates that perhaps he was a bit hasty. Sales have fallen a bit below marketing forecast, perhaps a 32,000 savings would be more appropriate
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
32,000
NPW = -100 + 32(P/A,15,5) = 7,269
![Page 11: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
MotivationTell your boss, new numbers indicate a go. Boss indicates that perhaps he was a bit hasty. Sales have fallen a bit below marketing forecast, perhaps a 32,000 savings would be more appropriate
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
32,000
NPW = -100 + 32(P/A,15,5) = 7,269
![Page 12: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
MotivationTell your boss, new numbers indicate a go. Boss leans back in his chair and says, you know . . . .
![Page 13: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
MotivationTell your boss, new numbers indicate a go. Boss leans back in his chair and says, you know . . . . I’ll do anything, just
tell me what numbersyou want to use!
![Page 14: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Motivation
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
A
NPW = -100 + A(P/A,15,5) > 0
![Page 15: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Motivation
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
A
NPW = -100 + A(P/A,15,5) > 0
A > 100/(A/P,15,5) > 29,830
![Page 16: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
A < 29,830A > 29,830
Motivation
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
A
![Page 17: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Break-Even Analysis
Site Fixed Cost/Yr Variable CostA=Austin $ 20,000 $ 50 S= Sioux Falls 60,000 40 D=Denver 80,000 30
TC = FC + VC * X
![Page 18: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Break-Even (cont)Break-Even Analysis
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000
Volume
Tota
l Cos
t AustinS. FallsDenver
![Page 19: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Class Problem A firm is considering a new product line and the following data have been recorded:
Sales price $ 15 / unitCost of Capital $300,000Overhead $ 50,000 / yr.Oper/maint. $ 50 / hr.Material Cost $ 5 / unitProduction 50 hrs / 1,000 unitsPlanning Horizon 5 yrs.MARR 15%
Compute the break even point.
![Page 20: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Class Problem Profit Margin = Sale Price - Material - Labor/Oper.
= $15 - 5 - $50 / hr
= $ 7.50 / unit
50 hrs1000 units
![Page 21: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Class Problem Profit Margin = Sale Price - Material - Labor/Oper.
= $15 - 5 - $25 / hr
= $ 7.50 / unit
50 hrs1000 units
1 2 3 4 5
300,000
7.5X
50,000
![Page 22: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Class Problem Profit Margin = Sale Price - Material - Labor/Oper.
= $15 - 5 - $25 / hr
= $ 7.50 / unit
50 hrs1000 units
1 2 3 4 5
300,000
7.5X
50,000
300,000(A/P,15,5) + 50,000 = 7.5X139,495 = 7.5XX = 18,600
![Page 23: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Suppose we consider the following cash flow diagram:
NPW = -100 + 35(P/A,15,5) = $ 17,325
Sensitivity
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
35,000
i = 15%
![Page 24: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Suppose we don’t know A=35,000 exactly but believe we can estimate it within some percentage error of + X.
Sensitivity
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
35,000(1+X) i = 15%
![Page 25: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Then,
EUAW = -100(A/P,15,5) + 35(1+X) > 0 35(1+X) > 100(.2983)
X > -0.148
Sensitivity
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
35,000(1+X)
i = 15%
![Page 26: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Sensitivity (cont.)NPV vs. Errors in A
(20,000)
(10,000)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
-0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20
Error X
NPV
![Page 27: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Now suppose we believe that the initial investment might be off by some amount X.
Sensitivity (Ao)
1 2 3 4 5
100,000(1+X)
35,000i = 15%
![Page 28: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Sensitivity (Ao)NPV vs Initial Cost Errors
(20,000)
(10,000)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
-0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20
Error X
NPV
![Page 29: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Sensitivity (A & Ao)NPV vs Errors
(20,000)
(10,000)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
-0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20
Error X
NPV
Errors in initial costErrors in Annual receipts
![Page 30: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Now suppose we believe that the planning horizon might be shorter or longer than we expected.
Sensitivity (PH)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
100,000
35,000i = 15%
![Page 31: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Sensitivity (PH)NPV vs Planning Horizon
(30,000)
(20,000)
(10,000)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
NPV
PH
![Page 32: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Sensitivity (Ind. Changes)
NPV vs Errors
(20,000)
(10,000)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
-0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20
Error X
NPV
Errors in initial costErrors in Annual receipts
n=3
n=7
Planning HorizonMARR
![Page 33: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Multivariable Sensitivity
Suppose our net revenue is composed of $50,000 in annual revenues which have an error of X and $20,000 in annual maint. costs which might have an error of Y (i=15%).
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
50,000(1+X)
20,000(1+Y)
![Page 34: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Multivariable Sensitivity
Suppose our net revenue is compose of $50,000 in annual revenues which have an error of X and $20,000 in annual maint. costs which might have an error of Y (i=15%).
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
50,000(1+X)
20,000(1+Y)
Multivariable SensitivitySuppose our net revenue is compose of $50,000 in annualrevenues which have an error of X and $20,000 in annualmaint. costs which might have an error of Y.
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
50,000(1+X)
20,000(1+Y)You S olve I t!! !
You Solve It!!!
![Page 35: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Multivariable Sensitivity
EUAW = -100(A/P,15,5) + 50(1+X) - 20(1+Y) > 0 50(1+X) - 20(1+Y) > 29.83
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
50,000(1+X)
20,000(1+Y)
![Page 36: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Multivariable Sensitivity
EUAW = -100(A/P,15,5) + 50(1+X) - 20(1+Y) > 0 50(1+X) - 20(1+Y) > 29.83 50X - 20Y > -0.17 X > 0.4Y - 0.003
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
50,000(1+X)
20,000(1+Y)
![Page 37: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Multivariable Sensitivity
Simultaneous Errors (Rev. vs. Cost)
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
-0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15
Error X
Erro
r Y
Unfavorable
Favorable
+ 10%
![Page 38: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Mutually Exclusive Alt.
Suppose we work for an entity in which the MARR is not specifically stated and there is some uncertainty as to which value to use. Suppose also we have the following cash flows for 3 mutually exclusive alternatives.t A1t A2t A3t
0 (50,000) (75,000) (100,000)1 18,000 25,000 32,000 2 18,000 25,000 32,000 3 18,000 25,000 32,000 4 18,000 25,000 32,000 5 18,000 25,000 32,000
![Page 39: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Mutually Exclusive Alt.t A1t A2t A3t
0 (50,000) (75,000) (100,000)1 18,000 25,000 32,000 2 18,000 25,000 32,000 3 18,000 25,000 32,000 4 18,000 25,000 32,000 5 18,000 25,000 32,000 MARR = NPV1 NPV2 NPV34.0% 30,133 36,296 42,458 6.0% 25,823 30,309 34,796 8.0% 21,869 24,818 27,767 10.0% 18,234 19,770 21,305 12.0% 14,886 15,119 15,353 14.0% 11,795 10,827 9,859 16.0% 8,937 6,857 4,777 18.0% 6,289 3,179 69 20.0% 3,831 (235) (4,300)
![Page 40: TM 661 Engineering Economics for Managers Break Even & Sensitivity.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052406/5a4d1b647f8b9ab0599aef9c/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Mutually Exclusive Alt.
NPV vs. MARR
(10,000)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0%
MARR
NPV
NPV1
NPV2
NPV3