Thomas Schneeweis Director CISDM/University of Massachusetts ...
-
Upload
ramen24 -
Category
Economy & Finance
-
view
1.369 -
download
0
Transcript of Thomas Schneeweis Director CISDM/University of Massachusetts ...
1
Thomas SchneeweisDirector
CISDM/University of Massachusetts-AmherstAmherst, Massachusetts 01003
Ph: 413-545-5641Email: [email protected]
Web: WWW.CISDM.ORG
October 4, 2002
THE PRESENTATION IS BASED ON INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM SOURCES THAT CISDM CONSIDERS TO BE RELIABLE; HOWEVER, CISDM MAKES NO REPRESENTATION AS TO, AND ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY FOR, THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION.
Hedge Fund StrategiesWhat are the Real Risk and Return Characteristics
2
Thomas Schneeweis is the Michael and Cheryl Philipp Professor of Finance at the University of Massachusetts, Director of the Center for International Securities and Derivatives Markets, Editor of The Journal of Alternative Investments and is on the Board of the Chartered Alternative Analyst Association. He has published over 70 articles in academic and financial practitioner journals, has presented papers at numerous professional meetings in areas of traditional and alternative investment, and has been quoted in widely in the financial press (Business Week, Financial Times, Wall Street Journal). He has edited several books including the Applications in Finance, Investment, and Banking (Kluwer, 1999) and The Handbook of Alternative Investments: An Investor's Guide (Institutional Investor, 1999). Dr. Schneeweis is also President of Schneeweis Partners LLC, which provides investment management and analytical support to institutional investors primarily in the area of alternative investments.
Background
3
I. Hedge Fund Investment: Background
II. Return and Risk Analysis in Hedge Funds
III. Hedge Fund Indices and Benchmarks
IV. Asset Allocation: Strategic and Tactical
V. Risk Analysis: VaR and Manager Analysis
Hedge Fund Strategies: Risk and Return
4
I: Hedge Fund Background: What is a Hedge Fund?
Term “Hedge Fund” is a misnomer with little descriptive power
1950’s: A.W. Jones Model
Long/Short U.S. equities
“Hedge fund” term accurately reflected his underlying strategy
2000’s: Generic reference to a private, commingled vehicle investing in marketable securities
Strategy characteristics vary widely
Risk/return characteristics vary widely
Common organizational and structural characteristics
5
Growth in Assets (in $billions)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
1990 2001
Growth in Assets (in$billions)
6
Growth in Hedge Fund Managers
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
1990 2001
Number of Managers/Funds
7
Source: Investments & Pensions Europe, May 2001
Wide International Interest
Country Interest In Hedge Fund Investment
010203040506070
Scandinavia
Netherlands
Italy
Sw
itzerland
UK
Europeantotal
France
Germ
any
% Institutions Likely to Invest In Hedge Funds
8
Recently, a substantial number of large U.S. and non-U.S. institutions, California Public Employees Retirement System, Northeastern University, Nestlé and UK Coal Pension and Yale University have indicated their continued interest in hedge fund investment.
Sources: New York Times, Pensions and Investments, Financial Times, IHT
Yale University: Asset Allocation (2000)
Foreign stocks9%
Hedge funds19%
Other8%
Private Equity26%
Real Estate15%
U.S. Stocks14%
Bonds9%
Growth of Hedge Funds
9
Sources: New York Times, Pensions and Investments, Financial Times, IHT
Institutional Interest in Hedge FundsAverage Asset Allocation of 25 Largest Universities
Fixed Income18%
Foreign Equities14%
Real Estate7%
Private Equity8%Hedge Funds
8%
High Yield Bond2%
U.S. Equity43%
Institutional Interest
10
Sources: New York Times, Pensions and Investments, Financial Times, IHT
Composition of Hedge Fund Investors
Composition of Hedge Fund Investors (1999)
U.S. Banks3.1% U.S. Endowments
8.4%U.S. Foundations
2.0%
U.S. Pensions8.2%
U.S. Fund of Funds13.1%
U.S. Individual47.6%
Trust4.0%
Corporate Account3.7%
U.S. Other4.8%U.S. Insurance
0.3%U.S. Family Office
4.7%Types of Hedge Fund Investors
High Net Worth Individual
Offshore Individual
Offshore Institution
University Endowment
Pension Fund
11
Hedge Fund Strategy Composition (2000)
Global Macro15.4%
Risk Arbitrage11.6%
Short Sellers0.1%
Convertible Arbitrage
3.4%
Distressed Securities
2.6%
Emerging Markets3.3%
Long/Short Equity37.9%
Equity Market Neutral5.0%
Long Only11.5%
Fixed Income Arbitrage
9.3%
Hedge Fund Strategy Composition (1990)
Global Macro71.1%
Long/Short Equity15.6%
Long Only0.6%
Equity Market Neutral1.7%
Fixed Income Arbitrage
3.2%
Short Sellers0.1%
Convertible Arbitrage
0.5%
Risk Arbitrage4.4%
Distressed Securities
2.4%
Emerging Markets0.4%
Growth of Hedge Funds
12
Myths of Hedge Fund Investment
•Hedge Funds Are An Investment Product of the 1990’s
•Hedge Funds Are Unique In Their Investment Strategies
•All Hedge Funds Are Risky Because They Use Derivatives
•Hedge Funds Are Highly Levered Risky Investments
13
Hedge Fund Facts
•Hedge Funds Are Not More Volatile Than Traditional Stock and Bond Funds
•Many Hedge Funds Are As Transparent Than Traditional Stock and Bond Funds (Fund Based or Separate Accounts)
• Most Hedge Funds Are As Liquid As Traditional Stock and Bond Funds (Depends on Strategy)
14
Hedge Fund Facts
•Hedge Funds Provide Unique Return Opportunities Not Available in Traditional Markets)
•We Know the Source of Hedge Fund Returns
•Indices Exist which Track Hedge Funds
15
Hedge Fund Facts
•Fees: (1 and 10 Fee Above Hurdle is Approximately 2-3% and Is Pure Active Return Whereas Traditional Mutual Funds Are About 1-2% much of which is Benchmarked to Index)
•Lack of Liquidity Is Reduced By New Forms of Guarantees
• Academic Evidence Shows That Trading Impacts on Local Market Are Limited Due To Relative Size of Hedge Fund Market In Comparison to Traditional Markets
•Some Evidence of Hedge Fund Affecting Individual Securities tocks but Little Evidence of Systemic Risk Within Markets or Across Countries
16
Goals of Hedge Fund Investment
• Take advantage of the ability to profit in a range of market environments
• Develop a diversified approach to capturing ‘alpha’
• Efficiently deliver returns at a risk level defined by the investor
17
Hedge Fund Core Portfolio• Manager Selection
• Select managers consistent with return and risk stability• Consistent sensitivity to market factors which underlie return drivers• Stability over time in relationship to index and other managers in style
• Strategy Selection• Take advantage of the ability to profit in a range of market environments• Develop a diversified approach to capturing ‘alpha’
18
Re
turn
Risk
Optimal Return to Risk Generator
Low Factor Sensitivity to Stock and Bond
Diversification of Judgment and Style
Small Incremental Return
Beneficial If Adds Alpha (Higher Return Same Factor Risk E.G., Equity Replication) Return Reduction
for Incremental Risk Reduction
Low Equity ExposureSatellite
(Specialist – E.G. Low
Equity, Credit Sensitivity)
Core Hedge Fund Portfolio
(Low Stock andBond Beta)
Satellite(Specialist -
(E.G. Equity Bias,Short Vol.)
Return/Risk Tradeoff
19
II: Risk and Return Analysis in Hedge Funds
• Investors get paid for bearing certain risks
• Beta is an important one. Credit risk, term structure risk, volatility risk, and liquidity risk are others
• Hedge fund strategies generally minimize beta and maximize exposure to the other risks
• Often misconstrued as absolute return (or return to skill)• Factor models quantify a fund’s exposure to these risks - separate
‘natural’ return from ‘skill
20
Each Hedge Fund Strategy or Managed Futures Strategy Has Own Economic Source of Return
• Equity Market Neutral - Relative Mispricing
• Convertible Arbitrage - Volatility, Credit Risk
• Merger Arbitrage - Equity And Credit Exposure
• Distressed Securities - Credit Spreads, Liquidity Risk
• Hedged Equity - Equity Factor Sensitivity, Volatility
• Managed Futures – Markets Trends
21
Hedge Fund Exposure to Market Factors
Univariate Regression of Returns Against Factors1990-02
Russell 1000 Russell 2000Lehman
AggregateChange in 10-
Year RateCredit
Spread
Change in Credit Spread VIX
Change in VIX
Traditional Portfolio (60/40) 0.57 0.33 -0.48 3.28 -3.17 -3.91 -0.34 -0.56Hedge Fund Portfolio (EW) 0.16 0.16 -0.05 0.82 -2.56 -2.28 -0.13 -0.16HFR Convertible Arbitrage 0.04 0.04 -0.02 0.40 -1.44 -0.50 -0.03 -0.04HFR Equity Hedge 0.48 0.44 -0.37 2.39 -5.23 -7.70 -0.29 -0.42HFR Event Driven 0.24 0.25 -0.09 1.87 -3.42 -3.55 -0.18 -0.30HFR Distressed Securities 0.12 0.14 0.03 0.47 -1.69 -2.34 -0.14 -0.16HFR Merger Arbitrage 0.08 0.07 -0.07 0.83 -2.15 0.11 -0.09 -0.09HFR Equity Market Neutral -0.02 0.02 0.19 -1.10 -1.01 0.55 0.02 0.07Russell 1000 1.00 0.47 -1.39 7.06 -4.39 -4.94 -0.48 -0.95Russell 2000 0.92 1.00 -1.44 8.94 -6.65 -8.36 -0.68 -1.18Lehman Aggregate -0.05 -0.03 1.00 -3.42 -0.17 -1.75 0.06 0.08Lehman Corp High Yield 0.26 0.23 0.06 2.06 -2.27 -5.52 -0.18 -0.37Treasuries, 10+ Yrs -0.14 -0.08 2.06 -7.99 -0.01 -1.75 0.17 0.25Treasuries, 3-5 Yrs -0.09 -0.06 0.94 -3.52 0.16 -1.82 0.10 0.13MSCI Emerging Markets 0.99 0.74 -1.88 10.38 -1.54 -12.83 -0.58 -1.14MSCI EAFE 0.73 0.49 -0.85 4.73 -2.18 -7.70 -0.38 -0.65
Betas With Respect to
22
Managed Futures Exposure to Market Factors
Factor Correlations (1990-2001)S&P 500 Leh. Bros. Bond Change in Credit Spread Change in
Moody's (Baa-Aaa) VIX Managed Futures
CISDM CTA$ -0.10 0.27 -0.02 0.18CISDM CTAEQ -0.14 0.20 0.10 0.20CISDM Currency 0.01 0.14 0.01 0.04CISDM Discretionary -0.06 0.18 -0.07 0.11CISDM Diversified -0.13 0.25 -0.01 0.24CISDM Financial -0.06 0.35 -0.04 0.17CISDM Trendfollowing -0.14 0.27 0.00 0.23
Hedge fundsCISDM Event Driven Univ. 0.47 0.10 -0.30 -0.41CISDM HF FOF Univ. 0.52 0.19 -0.15 -0.34CISDM Global Est. Univ. 0.78 0.17 -0.26 -0.47CISDM Mkt. Neutral Univ. 0.30 0.11 -0.21 -0.11
Traditional Assets
S&P 500 1.00 0.28 -0.15 -0.64Leh. Bros. Bond 0.28 1.00 -0.06 -0.06
23
Managed Futures Exposure to Market Factors
Factor Correlations: CISDM Managed Futures (1996-2001)S&P 500 Leh. Bros. Bond Change in Credit Spread Change in Trendfollowing Trendfollowing Trendfollowing Trendfollowing
Moody's (Baa-Aaa) VIX Interest Rate Currency Stock Physicals
CISDM CTA$ -0.07 0.48 0.02 0.15 0.58 0.54 0.28 0.22CISDM CTAEQ -0.10 0.37 0.20 0.15 0.58 0.61 0.27 0.18CISDM Currency 0.08 0.10 0.20 -0.13 0.00 0.69 -0.18 -0.06CISDM Discretionary 0.11 0.25 -0.21 -0.03 0.35 0.23 0.22 0.09CISDM Diversified -0.13 0.45 0.00 0.23 0.58 0.44 0.40 0.32CISDM Systematic -0.07 0.43 0.04 0.12 0.53 0.52 0.23 0.27CISDM Financial -0.10 0.51 0.04 0.18 0.64 0.48 0.26 0.13CISDM Trendfollowing -0.18 0.47 0.10 0.25 0.62 0.55 0.35 0.21
S&P 500 1.00 0.06 -0.07 -0.68 -0.07 -0.14 -0.23 -0.23Leh. Bros. Bond 0.06 1.00 0.06 0.08 0.48 0.13 0.28 0.12
* CTA returns are CISDM Universe Medians
** Trendfollowing Interest Rate, Currency, and Stock are Passive Systematic CTA Indices (See www.CISDM.org)
24
Hedge Fund Exposures During Extreme Periods
• Returns on hedge fund indices and various asset classes and factors were grouped in quartiles. Each group holds 25% of observations.
• The bottom quartile holds 25% of observations that are the lowest, while the top quartile holds 25% of observations that the highest.
• Returns on hedge fund indices and other asset classes were ranked using the dates that correspond to the observations in each quartile.
25
Exposures During Extreme Periods
Ranked on S&P500: 90-02
-6.00%
-4.00%
-2.00%
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
1 2 3 4
S&P 500 Return Convertible Arbitrage Equity Hedge
Event Driven Distressed Securities Merger Arbitrage
Equity Market Neutral
26
Exposures During Extreme Periods
Ranked on Aggregate Bond: 90-02
-1.00%
-0.50%
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
1 2 3 4
Lehman U.S. Aggregate Convertible Arbitrage Equity Hedge
Event Driven Distressed Securities Merger Arbitrage
Equity Market Neutral
27
Exposures During Extreme Periods
Ranked on Changes in VIX: 90-02
-1.00%
-0.50%
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
1 2 3 4
-6.00%
-4.00%
-2.00%
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
Convertible Arbitrage Equity Hedge Event Driven
Distressed Securities Merger Arbitrage Equity Market Neutral
Change in VIX
28
Exposures During Extreme Periods
Ranked on Changes in Credit Spread: 90-02
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
1 2 3 4
-0.10%
-0.05%
0.00%
0.05%
0.10%
0.15%
Convertible Arbitrage Equity Hedge Event Driven
Distressed Securities Merger Arbitrage Equity Market Neutral
Change in Credit Spread
29
Managed Futures Exposures During Extreme Periods
Ranking by S&P 500 (1990-12/2001)
S&P 500
CTA$
S&P 500
CTA$
-6.0%
-4.0%
-2.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
Portfolio Groupings
Ave
rage
Mon
thly
Ret
urn
S&P 500 -4.4% 0.1% 2.6% 6.1%
CTA$ 1.0% 1.0% 1.3% 0.5%
Zurich Event Driven Universe 0.2% 1.0% 1.5% 1.3%
Zurich Fund of Funds Universe -0.1% 0.9% 1.3% 1.3%
Zurich Global Established Universe -1.4% 0.7% 2.5% 3.4%
Zurich Market Neutral Universe 0.8% 0.9% 0.9% 1.0%
1 2 3 4
30
Hedge Fund Managers
Questions:
• How Persistent Are The Benefits Of Hedge Fund Managers?
• How Persistent Are Benefits Of Hedge Fund Strategies?
31
Persistence of Performance: Manager Based or Strategy Based
• We regressed monthly excess returns of several hedge fund managers against monthly excess returns on S&P500 and Lehman Aggregate Bond Index
• Risk is measured in terms of exposures to equity and bonds.
• The intercept represents the manager’s alpha.
32
Persistence of Alphas: Index Alpha High - Manager Alpha Low
Alphas for Convertible
-0.06
-0.05
-0.04
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
-0.025 -0.02 -0.015 -0.01 -0.005 0 0.005 0.01
Alpha 97-99
Alp
ha 0
0-0
1
33
Persistence of ExposuresS&P Beta Convertible Arb
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
S&P Betas 97-99
S&
P B
eta
s:
00-0
1
34
Persistence of Exposures
Aggregate Bond Beta for Convertible Arb
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
-3.5 -3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
Agg Bond Betas 97-99
Ag
g B
on
d B
eta
s 0
0-0
1
35
Summary
• Alphas at managers levels are not persistent.
• Alphas at the index levels are persistent.
• The same story can be said about risk exposures.
• With minor changes, these results hold for all strategies.
36
• Manager Based
• Security Based
• Factor Based
III: Hedge Fund Indices and Benchmarks
37
•No Universe of Manager Performance Index Exists• Current Universe of Managers (e.g., Zurich, TASS, …) Provide only limited representation of true Universe
•Most current ‘Universe Indices’ are not ‘True’ indices • Collection of self reporting managers
•Passive Versus Active Indices• Passive Index requires systematic security (e.g., strategy) or factor based representation of manager strategy and should reflect active manager index
Hedge Fund Universe Versus Hedge Fund Index
38
Hedge Fund Universe, Sub-Universe, Index
Universe of HedgeFunds (5000)
CISDM Sub-Universe (2500 approx)
HFR Sub Universe
TASS Sub-Universe
Zurich Hedge Fund Indices
CSFB/Tremont Index
•Composite of World Unknown•Sub-universe (e.g., HFR, TASS,Zurich) may or may not represent World Index•Personal Libraries (e.g., Zurich Hedge Fund Indices, CSFB, EACM) may better represent characteristics of specific area
than general random selection of books in general sub universe
Some intersection of hedge funds in variousSub-universes
39
EACM CSFB CISDM Passive LehmanS&P 500/ Lehman
Yearly Return 100 Tremont Fund of Funds S&P 500 Gov/Corp Portfolio*
1996 21.10% 14.39% 17.07% 22.22% 11.39% 22.96% 2.90% 14.65%1997 16.79% 16.20% 14.60% 25.94% 15.53% 33.36% 9.76% 23.66%
1998 2.62% -5.11% 1.58% -0.36% 8.17% 28.58% 9.47% 21.35%
1999 31.29% 26.47% 23.72% 23.43% 9.71% 21.04% -2.15% 11.40%
2000 4.98% 4.07% 7.93% 4.85% 8.06% -9.10% 11.85% -0.92%
2001 4.62% 2.80% 2.78% 4.42% 7.34% -11.89% 8.50% -3.68%
2002 to September -3.84% 0.33% 1.47% 0.90% 1.64% -28.16% 9.15% -14.61%
Jul-02 -2.81% -1.25% -0.93% -1.35% -1.50% -7.79% 1.20% -4.19%
Aug-02 0.52% 0.39% 0.57% 0.85% 0.84% 0.66% 2.24% 1.29%
Sep-02 -1.38% -0.48% -0.21% 0.08% 0.19% -10.87% 2.15% -5.66%
Annualized Return 10.92% 8.29% 9.96% 11.55% 9.10% 5.86% 7.24% 6.83%
Standard Deviation 8.59% 7.00% 4.93% 9.34% 3.04% 17.49% 3.99% 10.54%
Sharpe Ratio 0.74 0.54 1.10 0.75 1.50 0.08 0.68 0.22
Maximum Drawdown -11.42% -13.08% -6.25% -13.81% -2.62% -44.73% -3.77% -22.63%
Correlation with S&P 500 0.73 0.56 0.52 0.51 0.43 1.00 -0.04 0.99
Correlation with Lehman Gov't/Corp -0.11 -0.04 0.01 0.13 0.04 -0.04 1.00 0.11
Correlation with HFR FWC 1.00 0.91 0.88 0.77 0.48 0.73 -0.11 0.71
Correlation with HFR FOF 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.91 0.40 0.56 -0.04 0.55
Correlation with EACM 100 0.88 0.94 1.00 0.88 0.44 0.52 0.01 0.51Correlation with CSFB 0.77 0.91 0.88 1.00 0.32 0.51 0.13 0.53
CISDMMajor Hedge Fund Indices: Comparative Performance Analysis
September 2002
HFR Fund Weighted
CompositeHFR Fund of
Funds
Last Three Months
Performance: January-96 - September-02
40
Overview of Hedge Fund Indices
Selection Criteria: Decision rules determine which hedge funds are included in the index. Examples of selection criteria include length of track record, assets under management, and restrictions on new investment;
Style Classification: How each hedge fund is assigned to a style-specific index, and whether or not a fund that fails to satisfy the style classification methodology is excluded from the index;
Weighting Scheme: How much weight a particular fund’s return is given in the index. Common weighting schemes are equally weighted and dollar-weighted based on assets under management;
Rebalancing Scheme: What determines when assets are reallocated among the funds in a particular index. For example some funds are rebalanced monthly, while others assume annual rebalancing; and
Investability: Is the index directly or indirectly investable
41
Overview of Hedge Fund Indices
Zurich Hedge Fund
Indices
CISDM Hedge Fund
Universe
HFR Hedge Fund
Indices
EACM 100
CSFB/Tremont Hedge Fund
Indices
MSCI Hedge Fund
Indices
S&P Hedge Fund
Indices
Launch Date
2001 1994 1994 1996 2000 2002 2002
Index Committee
Yes No No No No No Yes
Composition Published
Yes No No No Yes No Yes
Classifications Primary/Sub
5 9/10 14/17 5/13 9 18/90 3/9
Report a “Hedge Fund Composite”
No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Approximate
Number of Funds
60 1600 1500 100 340 750 40
42
Overview of Hedge Fund Indices
Zurich
Hedge Fund Indices
CISDM Hedge Fund
Universe
HFR Hedge Fund
Indices EACM 100
CSFB/Tremont Hedge Fund
Indices
MSCI Hedge Fund
Indices
S&P Hedge Fund
Indices
Classification Methodology
Quantitative, independently
verifiable
Manager self classification
Manager self classification
Classified by EACM
Classified by Tremont
Classified by MSCI
Classified by S&P
Minimum
Assets
Varies ($25m
to $75m) None None
Not reported
$10m $25m Unknown
Min. Track
Record $25m for at least 2 yrs
None None Not
reported 1 year or $500m
assets 2 year or $200m
assets Unknown
Includes funds closed to new
investment Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No
43
Overview of Hedge Fund Indices
Zurich
Hedge Fund Indices
CISDM Hedge Fund
Universe
HFR Hedge Fund
Indices EACM 100
CSFB/Tremont Hedge Fund
Indices
MSCI Hedge Fund
Indices
S&P Hedge Fund
Indices
Measure of Performance
Equal Weight
Median Equal
Weight Equal
Weight Cap-Weighted Equal Weight
Styles - Equal Weight & Strategies -
Equal Weight
Rebalanced
Quarterly Monthly Monthly Annually Quarterly Annually Annually
Announcement of Index Changes
Prior to start of quarter
N/A N/A N/A Prior to start of
quarter Prior to start of
year Prior to start of
year
44
Alternative Hedge Fund Databases: Performance Comparisons (Jan 1998 – June 2002)
Zurich Convertible Arbitrage 10.52% 4.37% 1.40 1.00Hennessee Convertible Arbitrage Index. 10.93% 4.16% 1.57 0.74CSFB/Tremont Convertible Arbitrage 10.71% 5.70% 1.10 0.88EACM Convertible Hedge Relative Value 7.73% 6.38% 0.52 0.65HFR Convertible Arbitrage 12.55% 3.60% 2.26 0.80
Zurich Hedged Equity 10.51% 20.11% 0.30 1.00CSFB/Tremont Long/Short 12.33% 14.15% 0.56 0.91EACM Domestic Opportunistic Equity Hedge 15.57% 12.94% 0.86 0.77HFR Equity Hedge 14.20% 11.88% 0.82 0.96
Zurich Event Driven 9.14% 8.44% 0.56 1.00Hennessee Event Driven Index 9.29% 7.17% 0.68 0.92CSFB/Tremont Event Driven 7.58% 7.53% 0.42 0.91EACM Multi- Strategy Event Driven 12.01% 6.59% 1.15 0.90Zurich Universe Event-Driven Median 8.40% 4.97% 0.80 0.93HFR Event Driven 8.79% 7.95% 0.55 0.94
Zurich Distressed Securities 9.00% 9.74% 0.47 1.00Hennessee Distressed Index 6.59% 7.40% 0.29 0.85EACM Bankruptcy/ Distressed Event Driven 8.16% 6.43% 0.58 0.62Zurich Universe Distressed Securities Median 6.74% 6.36% 0.37 0.74HFR Distressed Securities 6.89% 6.85% 0.36 0.84
Zurich Merger Arbitrage 9.50% 4.03% 1.26 1.00Hennessee Merger Arbitrage Index 9.58% 4.55% 1.14 0.96EACM Risk Arbitrage Event Driven 6.89% 5.34% 0.46 0.92Zurich Universe Risk Arbitrage Median 8.76% 4.36% 1.00 0.92HFR Merger Arbitrage 9.24% 4.55% 1.06 0.93
Average Ann. Return
Ann. Standard Deviation Sharpe Ratio
Correlation with Zurich Index
45
Relative Index Performance: Fund of Fund Performance
Overall Hedge Fund IndicesMonthly Return Distributions: 1994-2001
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
-4.4
%
-3.3
%
-2.2
%
-1.1
%
0.1
%
1.2
%
2.3
%
3.4
%
4.6
%
Mo
re
Monthly Returns
Fre
qu
en
cy
EACM 100
HFR Weigt. Fund Index
CSFB Hedge Fund Index
46
Hedge Fund Databases: Convertible Arbitrage Example
Average Annualized Return and Standard Deviation (01/98-06/02)Convertible Arbitrage
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
Average Ann. Return 10.52% 10.93% 10.71% 7.73% 12.55%
Ann. Standard Deviation 4.37% 4.16% 5.70% 6.38% 3.60%
Zurich Convertible Arbitrage
Hennessee Convertible
CSFB/Tremont Convertible
EACM Convertible Hedge Relative
HFR Convertible Arbitrage
47
Index Creation: Index Based Replication
Fund of FundsAnnual Mean 10.68%Annual Std Deviation 7.59%Correlation with S&P500 32.80%Correlation with LB Bond Index16.25%
Hennessee Macro HFRI F of F EACM 100Annual Mean 9.70% Annual Mean 9.34% Annual Mean 11.85%Annual Std Deviation 8.68% Annual Std Deviation 7.03% Annual Std Deviation 4.86%Corr with S&P500 50.71% Correlation with S&P500 53.30% Correlation with S&P500 47.88%Corr with LB Bond Index 21.17% Correlation with LB Bond Index1.30% Correlation with LB Bond Index 8.29%Corr with 's 75.13% Corr with 's 77.05% Corr with 's 79.41%
Portfolio 1 Weights Portfolio 2 Weights Portfolio 3 WeightsHennessee Macro 87.37% HFRI F of F 79.35% EACM 100 60.04%S&P500 0.00% S&P500 20.65% S&P500 39.96%LB Aggregate Bond 0.79% LB Aggregate Bond 0.00% LB Aggregate Bond 0.00%T-Bill 11.84% T-Bill 0.00% T-Bill 0.00%
Mean Ret on the Portfolio 9.12% Mean Ret on the Portfolio 11.36% Mean Ret on the Portfolio 14.76%Std. Deviation of the Portfolio 7.59% Std. Deviation of the Portfolio 7.59% Std. Deviation of the Portfolio 7.59%Corr with 's 75.13% Corr with 's 69.47% Corr with 's 55.37%Corr with S&P500 50.72% Corr with S&P500 78.31% Corr with S&P500 94.13%Corr with LB Bond Index 21.63% Corr with LB Bond Index 10.96% Corr with LB Bond Index 22.54%
Portfolio 4 WeightsHennessee Macro 59.6%HFRI F of F 40.4%EACM 100 0.0%S&P500 0.0%LB Aggregate Bond 0.0%T-Bill 0.0%
Mean Ret on the Portfolio 9.55%Std. Deviation of the Portfolio 7.59%Corr with 's 80.0%Corr with S&P500 54.5%Corr with LB Bond Index 14.9%
-0 .10 0-0 .08 0-0 .06 0-0 .04 0-0 .02 00 .00 00 .02 00 .04 00 .06 00 .08 0
F u n d o f F u n d s R ep lic a t in g P ort fo lio 4
Replicating Active FOF Manager: Fund of Funds
48
CISDM Active EACM Systematic CSFB-Tremont HFI Managed Futures CISDMAnnualized Return 7.42% 8.22% 5.55% 9.83%Standard Deviation 8.38% 12.58% 11.22% 8.26%
CISDM Active EACM Systematic CSFB-Tremont HFI Managed Futures CISDMSharpe Ratio 0.29 0.26 0.05 0.58
CISDM Active EACM Systematic CSFB-Tremont HFI Managed Futures CISDMCorrelation 0.79 0.76 0.78 1.00
Ranked Returns: 1996-5/2002
-10.00%
-5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77
CISDM Active
EACM Systematic
CSFB-Tremont HFIManaged Futures
CISDM
Security Based Passive Indices (CTA Example)
49
EACM HFRI CSFB-Tremont CISDMAnnualized Return 16.1% 16.6% 14.7% 15.6%Standard Deviation 12.1% 10.7% 12.8% 11.1%
EACM HFRI CSFB-Tremont CISDMSharpe Ratio 0.92 1.08 0.76 0.96
EACM HFRI CSFB-Tremont CISDMCorrelation 0.57 0.86 0.75 1.00
Ranked Returns 1996-2001
-15.00%
-10.00%
-5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77
EACM DomOpp
HFRI Equity Hedge Index
CSFB-Tremont HFI Long-Short Equity
CISDM
Multi-Factor Based Index Replication
50
IV: Asset Allocation
• Issues in Asset Allocation
• Number of Managers Required• Index and Fund Tracking • Return Forecasting
• Traditional Approaches Fund Creation
• Strategic and Tactical
51
Allocation for the Institutional Investor
Naïve Multi-Manager Portfolios: An equal weighted portfolio of 8 to 10 mangers generally Reduces the risk of the portfolio to that of the universe of managers from which they are drawn: Variance of an Equal Weighted Portfolio= 1/N*(average variance of all managers – average covariance between managers) + average covariance between managers. Naïve diversification is more effective the larger the difference between the average variance and the average covariance of all managers (e.g., more heterogeneous the manager strategies)
Markowitz Mean/Variance Asset Allocation: Managers are naively selected to maximize the return to risk (e.g., standard deviation) tradeoff. The Return of the Portfolio = weighted average of the individual managers and the Variance of the Portfolio = the combination of the weighted variances of the individual managers plus their weighted covariances. The benefits of mean/variance asset allocation depend on the relative returns, variances and covariances (e.g., correlations and standard deviations).
Inputs to Markowitz Mean/Variance Problem
2[ ] [ ] [ , ]
[ , ] [ ]
p i i
p i i i j i j
i j i j Market
R X R
Var R X Var R X X Cov R R
Cov R R Var R
52
18
Naïve Diversification
Source: Center for International Securities and Derivatives Markets University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Effect of Diversification (Equal Weighted)
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
1 5 9
13
17
21
25
29
33
37
Number of Managers
Mo
nth
ly S
tan
dard
Devia
tio
n (
%)
RelativeValueLong ShortEquity
ConvertibleHedgeBond Hedge
Naïve Multi-Manager Portfolios
53
21
Active Manager Based: Style Pure
A v e ra g e P o r tfo lio C o rre la tio n w ith P a ire d E A C M In d e x : E q u a l W e ig h te d P o r tfo lio s R a n d o m ly S e le c te d
0
0 . 1
0 . 2
0 . 3
0 . 4
0 . 5
0 . 6
0 . 7
0 . 8
0 . 9
1
1 3 5 7 9 11 13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
35
37
39
41
43
S iz e o f P o r tfo l io
Co
rre
lati
on
D is t re s s e d R is k A rb it ra g e G lo b a l E s ta b l is h e d
Indices Which Reflect Performance of Investable Hedge Funds
•Zurich•EACM
Naïve Multi-Manager Portfolios
54
Comparison of Passive Index and Active Portfolio Factor Correlations (1998-2000)
Manager Based Fund FoF Mkt Neutral Arbitrage Global Macro* Long/ShortEquity
Change in Credit Spread -0.39 0.17 0.12 -0.55 -0.38Change in Stk (VIX) Implied Vol. -0.04 -0.11 -0.31 -0.21 -0.28S&P 500 0.26 0.18 0.30 0.30 0.41Lehman Bond 0.04 -0.15 -0.23 0.20 -0.07
Comparison Indices EACM100 Equity Arbitrage** Global Macro* Long/ShortMkt. Neutral Portfolio Equity
Change in Credit Spread -0.38 0.05 -0.21 -0.20 -0.33Change in Stk (VIX) Implied Vol. -0.31 0.16 -0.35 -0.09 -0.18S&P 500 0.50 0.03 0.42 0.27 0.32Lehman Bond -0.15 0.07 -0.42 0.26 -0.06
* 7/99-12/2000
** 25% Merger Arbitrage; 45% Convertible Arbitrage; 10% Bankruptcy; 10% Bond Hedge; 10% Long/Short
In Asset Allocation, Indices Must Reflect Asset Manager’s Sensitivity to Factors
55
Evolution of Hedge Fund Assets, 1991-2000
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1/1
/91
1/1
/92
1/1
/93
1/1
/94
1/1
/95
1/1
/96
1/1
/97
1/1
/98
1/1
/99
1/1
/00
EmergingMarkets
Fixed Income
Equity Hedge
Convertible
Relative Value
ManagedFutures
Short Sellers
Global Macro
Global Macro
Relative Value
Equity Hedge
Emerging Markets
Historical indexes May not Reflect Future Returns of Current Index
56
Return Relationships (1990-2000)
R-Square R-Square CAPM Multi-factor SharpeHistorical Volatility Sharpe Beta Market Model Multi-factor Estimate Return Estimate Return Estimate Return
Return
HFRI Convertible Arbitrage Index 11.4% 3.4% 1.92 0.09 0.12 0.19 5.9% 6.4% 7.7%HFRI Distressed Securities Index 14.6% 6.6% 1.48 0.19 0.15 0.26 7.0% 7.3% 10.3%HFRI Emerging Markets (Total) 15.3% 16.4% 0.63 0.67 0.32 0.36 12.5% 14.2% 18.4%HFRI Emerging Markets: Asia Index 10.1% 14.5% 0.36 0.49 0.22 0.23 10.4% 11.5% 16.8%HFRI Equity Hedge Index 21.2% 9.3% 1.75 0.41 0.37 0.37 9.5% 11.4% 12.5%HFRI Equity Market Neutral Index 11.0% 3.3% 1.87 0.05 0.05 0.03 5.5% 6.4% 7.6%HFRI Equity Non-Hedge Index 19.2% 14.4% 0.99 0.78 0.56 0.60 13.7% 16.4% 16.7%HFRI Event-Driven Index 16.1% 6.4% 1.75 0.27 0.35 0.47 8.0% 8.7% 10.1%HFRI Fixed Income (Total) 10.9% 3.7% 1.62 0.11 0.17 0.22 6.1% 6.4% 7.9%HFRI Fixed Income: Arbitrage Index 8.7% 4.9% 0.78 -0.03 0.01 0.00 4.6% 4.4% 8.9%HFRI Fixed Income: High Yield Index 9.9% 6.9% 0.72 0.21 0.17 0.33 7.2% 6.9% 10.6%HFRI Fund of Funds Index 11.5% 6.3% 1.05 0.19 0.17 0.19 7.0% 7.7% 10.0%HFRI Fund Weighted Composite Index 16.4% 7.3% 1.58 0.35 0.45 0.50 8.9% 10.1% 10.9%HFRI Macro Index 17.9% 9.3% 1.41 0.29 0.19 0.24 8.2% 8.3% 12.5%HFRI Market Timing Index 14.8% 6.9% 1.43 0.32 0.42 0.41 8.5% 10.1% 10.5%HFRI Merger Arbitrage Index 13.2% 3.9% 2.15 0.11 0.16 0.28 6.1% 6.7% 8.0%HFRI Relative Value Arbitrage Index 13.4% 4.0% 2.12 0.10 0.12 0.20 6.0% 6.3% 8.2%HFRI Sector (Total) 23.9% 14.2% 1.34 0.50 0.24 0.27 10.6% 12.1% 16.5%HFRI Statistical Arbitrage Index 11.1% 3.8% 1.66 0.14 0.27 0.26 6.5% 7.8% 8.0%
Historical Returns May Be Poor Forecasts Of Future Hedge Fund Return
57
Current New Expected <---------------- Annualized Expected Returrsn to be entered by userAsset Classes Weights Weights Min Max ReturnsHFRI Convertible Arbitrage Index 0% 0% 0% 5% 12%HFRI Distressed Securities Index 0% 5% 0% 5% 12%HFRI Equity Hedge Index 0% 5% 0% 5% 12% Use Historical Returns? Yes = 1, No = 0HFRI Equity Market Neutral Index 0% 0% 0% 5% 12% Enter 1 or 0 0HFRI Event-Driven Index 0% 5% 0% 5% 12%HFRI Merger Arbitrage Index 0% 5% 0% 5% 12%Russell 1000 (TR) 50% 50% 40% 50% 12%Russell 2000 (TR) 10% 10% 5% 10% 12%Treasuries, 1-3 year 5% 5% 5% 20% 12%Treasuries, 7-10 year 10% 5% 5% 20% 12%Corporate AAA 7-10 year 15% 5% 5% 20% 12% Total risk is defines as:Corporate BBB 7-10 year 10% 5% 5% 20% 12% Lambda * Std + (1-Lambda)* Std of Tracking ErrorGS Commodity TR (Total Return) 0% 0% 0% 0% 12% Lambda = 1 will minimize StdNAREIT-Equity TR (Total Return) 0% 0% 0% 0% 12% Lambda = 0 will minimize tracking error riskTotal 100% 100% 1 1
First Column of Data 1 Read the instruction on the data sheetLast Column of Date 145
Riskless Rate 5%Total Risk 9.9%
Mean Stdev Sharpe Ratio Portfolio Trac Port Alpha Lambda 1.0Portfolio 12.00% 9.47% 0.74 1 0.99 0.28 Target 11.0%Tracking Portfolio 12.00% 9.94% 0.70 0.99 1 0.41Alpha 0.00% 1.35% 0.28 0.41 1
Annualized Correlations versus
Traditional Approach to Mean Variance Optimization
58
Asset Allocation
• Given problems in return forecasts, one may simply assume traditional asset weights are chosen correctly and one wishes to chose hedge fund replacement strategies which produce alpha.
• We consider the case of an investor who wants to reduce his/her holdings of a traditional asset class and invest the proceeds in a portfolio of hedge funds.
• The goal is to make the new portfolio a close substitute for the original portfolio.
59
Stand Alone Substitutes for Assets Classes Equity
Russell 1000 80%Russell 2000 20%
HFR Conv Arb 10%HFR Eq Hedge 35%HFR Ev Driven 25%HFR Dist Sec 10%HFR Merg Arb 10%HFR EMN 10%
SharpeMean Stdev Skewness Kutrosis Auto-Corr VaR 5% Min Max Ratio
Equity 13.0% 12.5% -0.31 1.15 1% -5.07% -10.0% 10.7% 0.64HF 16.2% 4.9% -0.58 0.95 37% -1.16% -3.3% 4.7% 2.30Alpha 3.2% 9.7% -0.29 1.13 -8% -8.0% 8.1%
MonthlyAnnualized
Mean Stdev Sharpe Ratio Equity HF AlphaEquity 13.04% 12.48% 0.64 1 0.70 -0.93HF 16.21% 4.87% 2.30 0.70 1 -0.39Alpha 3.17% 9.73% -0.93 -0.39 1
Annualized Correlations versus
60
Stand Alone Substitutes for Assets Classes Equity
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
Jan-9
0
Apr-9
0
Jul-9
0
Oct-9
0
Jan-9
1
Apr-9
1
Jul-9
1
Oct-9
1
Jan-9
2
Apr-9
2
Jul-9
2
Oct-9
2
Jan-9
3
Apr-9
3
Jul-9
3
Oct-9
3
Jan-9
4
Apr-9
4
Jul-9
4
Oct-9
4
Jan-9
5
Apr-9
5
Jul-9
5
Equity HF
61
Stand Alone Substitutes for Assets Classes Corporate Bonds
Corporate AAA, 7-10 Yrs 50%Corporate BBB, 7-10 Yrs 50%
HFR Conv Arb 37%HFR Eq Hedge 10%HFR Ev Driven 10%HFR Dist Sec 10%HFR Merg Arb 10%HFR EMN 23%
Mean Stdev Sharpe Ratio Equity HF AlphaEquity 9.89% 5.27% 0.93 1 0.51 -0.79HF 12.90% 3.29% 2.40 0.51 1 0.13Alpha 3.01% 4.57% -0.79 0.13 1
Annualized Correlations versus
SharpeMean Stdev Skewness Kutrosis Auto-Corr VaR 5% Min Max Ratio
Equity 9.9% 5.3% -0.21 0.41 27% -1.76% -2.9% 5.2% 0.93HF 12.9% 3.3% -0.79 0.53 57% -0.68% -1.8% 3.1% 2.40Alpha 3.0% 4.6% 0.06 0.74 17% -3.8% 3.7%
MonthlyAnnualized
62
Stand Alone Substitutes for Assets Classes Corporate Bonds
-0.04
-0.03-0.02
-0.01
0.000.01
0.02
0.03
0.040.05
0.06
Jan-9
0
Apr-9
0
Jul-9
0
Oct-9
0
Jan-9
1
Apr-9
1
Jul-9
1
Oct-9
1
Jan-9
2
Apr-9
2
Jul-9
2
Oct-9
2
Jan-9
3
Apr-9
3
Jul-9
3
Oct-9
3
Jan-9
4
Apr-9
4
Jul-9
4
Oct-9
4
Jan-9
5
Apr-9
5
Jul-9
5
Equity HF
63
Traditional Assets & Hedge Funds
Current NewAsset Classes Weights WeightsHFR Convertible Arbitrage 0% 10%HFR Equity Hedge 0% 40%HFR Event Driven 0% 20%HFR Distressed Securities 0% 10%HFR Merger Arbitrage 0% 10%HFR Equity Market Neutral 0% 10%Russell 1000 50% 0%Russell 2000 10% 0%Lehman Aggregate 40% 0%Lehman Corp High Yield 0% 0%Treasuries, 10+ Yrs 0% 0%Treasuries, 3-5 Yrs 0% 0%MSCI Emerging Markets 0% 0%MSCI EAFE 0% 0%Total 100% 100%
Mean Stdev Sharpe RatioTraditional PortfolioHedge Fund PortfolioAlphaTraditional Portfolio 9.67% 9.46% 0.49 1 0.75 -0.79Hedge Fund Portfolio 14.46% 5.95% 1.59 0.75 1 -0.18Alpha 4.80% 6.35% -0.79 -0.18 1
Annualized Correlations versus
-0.10
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
Jan-90
Jul-90
Jan-91
Jul-91
Jan-92
Jul-92
Jan-93
Jul-93
Jan-94
Jul-94
Jan-95
Jul-95
Jan-96
Jul-96
Jan-97
Jul-97
Jan-98
Jul-98
Jan-99
Jul-99
Jan-00
Jul-00
Jan-01
Jul-01
Jan-02
Jul-02
Traditional Portfolio Hedge Fund Portfolio
Data: 1990-02
64
Strategic and Tactical Asset Allocation
• Strategic Asset Allocation (Long Term Allocation)
• Hedge Funds to Replicate Hedge Fund Indices• Hedge Funds to Replicate Cash Market Indices
• Tactical Asset Allocation (Short Term Rebalancing)
• Hedge Fund Strategies Lead/Lag Relationships with Economic Variables
65
Hedge Funds Replicate Hedge Fund Indices
Current OptimizedAssets Weights Weights Min Max Mean StdLehman Aggregate Bond Index 0.0% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 8.29% 3.55%EACM Dom Opp. 100.0% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 19.40% 12.04%Russell 2000 (TR) 0.0% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 13.43% 19.76%MSCI Europe 15 Local Currency 0.0% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 16.18% 15.13%HE Bennett/Lawrence Partners, L.P. 0.0% 5.00% 5.00% 25.00% 21.92% 29.20%HE Aquila International Fund Ltd 0.0% 5.00% 5.00% 25.00% 5.58% 15.77%HE Richmont Opportunity Composite 0.0% 5.00% 5.00% 25.00% 15.85% 14.88%HE Gardner Lewis Fund L.P. 0.0% 5.00% 5.00% 25.00% 28.43% 31.93%HE WPG-Farber, Present Fund, L.P. 0.0% 25.00% 5.00% 25.00% 22.13% 24.24%HE FLA International Fund Ltd 0.0% 5.00% 5.00% 25.00% 22.10% 18.77%HE DeSantis Capital Partners LP 0.0% 5.00% 5.00% 25.00% 19.75% 17.14%HE Aggressive Growth Partners L.P. 0.0% 5.00% 5.00% 25.00% 14.79% 34.73%HE Zweig-DiMenna Partners, L.P. 0.0% 5.00% 5.00% 25.00% 20.69% 23.79%HE TGT Capital Partners L.P. 0.0% 13.0% 5.00% 25.00% 18.47% 14.57%HE Needham Emerging Growth Partners , L.P. 0.0% 5.00% 5.00% 25.00% 30.62% 21.35%HE Steel Partners II, L.P. 0.0% 16.97% 5.00% 25.00% 21.91% 13.92%Total 0.0% 0.00% 0.0% 0.0% 15.38% 4.08%HFRI Relative Value Arbitrage Index 0.0% 0.00% 0.0% 0.0% 15.93% 3.76%HFRI Short Selling Index 0.0% 0.00% 0.0% 0.0% -18.77% 22.00%HFRI Statistical Arbitrage Index 0.0% 0.00% 0.0% 0.0% 11.59% 3.35%Total 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100.0%
5.0% 5.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mean Std Sharpe EACM Dom Opp. Optimized TE T Bond IT S&PEACM Dom Opp. 19.40% 12.04% 1.20 1 0.83 0.00 -0.13 0.27Optimized Portfolio 20.64% 14.59% 1.07 0.83 1 0.56 -0.07 0.48Tracking Error 1.25% 8.2% 0.00 0.56 1.00 0.07 0.47
Annualized
Annualized Correlations
Hedge Funds can be used Replicate EACM 100 Index used in Asset Allocation
66
Hedge Funds can be used Replicate Russell Index used in Asset Allocation
Current OptimizedAssets Weights Weights Min Max Mean StdLehman Aggregate Bond Index 0.0% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 8.29% 3.55%Russell 1000 (TR) 0.0% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 17.56% 15.63%Russell 2000 (TR) 100.0% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 13.43% 19.76%MSCI Europe 15 Local Currency 0.0% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 16.18% 15.13%HE Bennett/Lawrence Partners, L.P. 0.0% 5.00% 5.00% 50.00% 21.92% 29.20%HE Aquila International Fund Ltd 0.0% 5.00% 5.00% 50.00% 5.58% 15.77%HE Richmont Opportunity Composite 0.0% 13.39% 5.00% 50.00% 15.85% 14.88%HE Gardner Lewis Fund L.P. 0.0% 20.24% 5.00% 50.00% 28.43% 31.93%HE WPG-Farber, Present Fund, L.P. 0.0% 5.00% 5.00% 50.00% 22.13% 24.24%HE FLA International Fund Ltd 0.0% 5.00% 5.00% 50.00% 22.10% 18.77%HE DeSantis Capital Partners LP 0.0% 5.00% 5.00% 50.00% 19.75% 17.14%HE Aggressive Growth Partners L.P. 0.0% 5.00% 5.00% 50.00% 14.79% 34.73%HE Zweig-DiMenna Partners, L.P. 0.0% 9.80% 5.00% 50.00% 20.69% 23.79%HE TGT Capital Partners L.P. 0.0% 13% 5.00% 50.00% 18.47% 14.57%HE Needham Emerging Growth Partners , L.P. 0.0% 5.00% 5.00% 50.00% 30.62% 21.35%HE Steel Partners II, L.P. 0.0% 8.96% 5.00% 50.00% 21.91% 13.92%Total 0.0% 0.00% 0.0% 0.0% 15.38% 4.08%HFRI Relative Value Arbitrage Index 0.0% 0.00% 0.0% 0.0% 15.93% 3.76%HFRI Short Selling Index 0.0% 0.00% 0.0% 0.0% -18.77% 22.00%HFRI Statistical Arbitrage Index 0.0% 0.00% 0.0% 0.0% 11.59% 3.35%Total 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100.0%
5.0% 5.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mean Std Sharpe Russell 2000 (TR)Optimized TE T Bond IT S&PRussell 2000 (TR) 13.43% 19.76% 0.43 1 0.93 -0.50 -0.07 0.64Optimized Portfolio 21.04% 17.28% 0.93 0.93 1 -0.14 -0.10 0.65
Tracking Error 7.61% 7.5% -0.50 -0.14 1.00 -0.04 -0.18
Annualized
Annualized Correlations
67
Tactical Asset Allocation
• Returns on traditional assets classes are somewhat predictable using lagged values of certain variables
• Credit risk, Volatility, Term Premium, Returns, etc
• We used the lagged values of a set of factors to predict returns to various hedge fund strategies.
68
Tactical Asset Allocation
• We considered rebalancing our portfolio on a systematic basis.
• The estimation period is a rolling 2-years period and starts on Jan 1990 and ends with Dec 1999.
69
Tactical Asset AllocationHFR
Convertible Arbitrage
Change in Credit Spread
Change in VIX
Change in Term Spread
Russell 1000
Lehman Aggregate
Mean 0.9% 0.0% 0.1% 6.0% 0.9% Standard Deviation 1.0% 0.1% 3.9% 1.2% 4.3%
Regression Results Intercept
Change in Credit Spread
Change in VIX
Change in Term Spread
Russell 1000
Lehman Aggregate
Coeffcients 0.010 -0.522 -0.041 -0.042 0.046 0.151Standard Errors 0.004 0.906 0.025 0.063 0.024 0.070T-Stat 2.677 -0.576 -1.628 -0.669 1.949 2.171Prob 1% 57% 11% 50% 5% 3%R Squared 17%
1-Month Lagged Variables
HFR Distressed Securities
Change in Credit Spread
Change in VIX
Change in Term Spread
Russell 1000
Lehman Aggregate
Mean 1.2% 0.0% 0.1% 6.0% 0.9% Standard Deviation 1.8% 0.1% 3.9% 1.2% 4.3%
Regression Results Intercept
Change in Credit Spread
Change in VIX
Change in Term Spread
Russell 1000
Lehman Aggregate
Coeffcients 0.004 -4.220 -0.100 0.119 0.072 -0.022Standard Errors 0.007 1.731 0.048 0.120 0.045 0.133T-Stat 0.532 -2.438 -2.094 0.990 1.594 -0.163Prob 60% 2% 4% 32% 11% 87%R Squared 17%
1-Month Lagged Variables
70
Tactical Asset Allocation To Best of Five
• Systematic reallocation is beneficial
• Benefits are reduced when the reallocation interval is increased.
Equally Weighted Portfolio
Reallocation Based on Forecast
Reallocation Based on 1-Month Wait
Reallocation Based on 2-Month Wait
Reallocation Based on 3-Month Wait
Perfect Foresight
Annualized Return 11.33% 21.71% 14.05% 14.46% 14.08% 29.57%Annualized St Dev 4.56% 6.62% 6.47% 8.47% 7.02% 6.53%
71
V: Risk Analysis• Manager Level
• Sophisticated risk management including VaR analysis to ensure style consistency, and leverage management
• Segregated accounts to eliminate possibility of fraud, and gross mismanagement
• Style Level: Oversight ensures level of concentration within individual securities/sectors within appropriate limits
• Portfolio Level: Daily reports to clients/structuring partners outlining risk levels
72
VaR Analysis on Portfolio AssetsCurrent New
Asset Classes Weights Weights Min MaxS&P500 35% 25% 20% 35%Russell2000 20% 15% 15% 20%Lehman Agg 10% 10% 5% 10%Lehman High Yield Credit Bond 15% 15% 5% 15%Lehman Global Aggregate Index 5% 5% 0% 5%MSCI EAFE 5% 5% 5% 5%MSCI Europe 15 U.S. Currency 0% 0% 0% 0%GS Commodity TR (Total Return) 0% 0% 0% 0%NAREIT-Equity TR (Total Return) 5% 5% 5% 5%3-Month Treasury 5% 5% 5% 5%HFR Eq Mkt Neutral 0% 0% 0% 0%HFR Conv Arb 0% 0% 0% 0%HFR Fixed Inc Arb 0% 0% 0% 0%HFR Dist Sec 0% 5% 5% 5%HFR Merger Arb 0% 0% 0% 0%HFR Event 0% 0% 0% 0%HFR Hedged Eq 0% 10% 0% 10%HFR Macro 0% 0% 0% 0%MAR CTA$ 0% 0% 0% 0%Total 100% 100% 1 1
SharpeMean Stdev Skewness Kutrosis Auto-Corr Var = 95% Min Max Ratio
Original Portfolio 10.6% 9.7% -0.80 1.59 5% -4.23% -11% 7% 0.58Optimized Portfolio 11.4% 8.5% -0.84 1.77 7% -3.55% -9% 7% 0.75Alpha 0.7% 1.5% -0.05 0.49 -2% -1% 1%S&P500 13.4% 14.4% -0.47 0.85 -10% -6.18% -14% 11% 0.58Russell2000 12.1% 18.4% -0.45 1.06 10% -8.30% -19% 17% 0.38Lehman Agg 8.0% 3.8% -0.20 0.17 22% -1.18% -2% 4% 0.79Lehman High Yield Credit Bond 9.1% 7.5% 0.00 5.47 35% -2.56% -7% 11% 0.54Lehman Global Aggregate Index 7.2% 4.9% 0.17 -0.09 27% -1.68% -3% 5% 0.44MSCI EAFE 4.2% 17.0% -0.05 0.45 -8% -7.72% -14% 16% -0.05MSCI Europe 15 U.S. Currency 9.8% 15.0% -0.42 0.42 -8% -6.79% -13% 10% 0.32GS Commodity TR (Total Return) 7.1% 18.2% 0.96 2.74 14% -6.24% -12% 23% 0.11NAREIT-Equity TR (Total Return) 11.4% 12.6% 0.28 0.44 9% -4.71% -9% 11% 0.513-Month Treasury 5.0% 0.4% 0.36 0.19 98% 0.26% 0% 1% 0.01 HFR Eq Mkt Neutral 10.8% 3.3% -0.10 0.34 -3% -0.68% -2% 4% 1.77HFR Conv Arb 11.5% 3.4% -1.41 3.35 54% -0.98% -3% 3% 1.88HFR Fixed Inc Arb 8.6% 4.8% -1.66 8.42 41% -1.91% -6% 5% 0.75HFR Dist Sec 14.6% 6.5% -0.73 5.68 50% -2.02% -9% 7% 1.49HFR Merger Arb 12.1% 4.4% -3.23 14.99 15% -1.63% -6% 3% 1.60HFR Event 15.4% 6.6% -1.49 6.13 27% -2.36% -9% 5% 1.56HFR Hedged Eq 19.4% 9.4% 0.12 1.23 11% -2.68% -8% 11% 1.54HFR Macro 16.8% 9.1% 0.23 0.15 18% -2.73% -6% 8% 1.30MAR CTA$ 11.2% 10.2% 0.86 2.56 2% -3.00% -6% 14% 0.61
MonthlyAnnualized
73
Due Diligence, Controls & Portfolio Monitoring
Due Diligence
Background checks
Registrations and regulatory checks
Verification of education and certification
Investment methodology and risk protocol
Systems and procedures review (including disaster recovery, back office and compliance practices)
On-site visits
Controls & Portfolio Monitoring
Separate account structure
Custody of all assets
Leverage limitations
Favorable liquidity terms
Transparency and risk analytics
Defined portfolio guidelines
74
Conclusions
• Style Pure Fund or Manager Indices Provide Surrogates for Risk and Return Process Underlying Strategy
• Factor Based Indices Provide Surrogates for Risk and Return Process Underlying Strategy If Strategy Has Fundamental Market Factor Driving Process
• Security Based Indices Provide Tradable Surrogate Risk and Return Process Underlying Strategy If Strategy Is Traded In A Systematic Manner
75
Appendix
CSFB EACM HFR CISDM Passive CSFB EACM HFR CISDM Passive CSFB EACM HFR CISDM Passive
Convertible Convertible Convertible Convertible Long/Short Equity Equity Equity Fixed Inc. Bond Fixed Income Fixed Income
Yearly Return Arbitrage Arbitrage Arbitrage Arbitrage Equity Hedge Hedge Hedge Arbitrage Hedge Arbitrage Arbitrage
1996 17.87% 13.57% 14.56% 8.01% 17.12% 22.08% 21.75% 21.34% 15.93% 16.37% 11.89% 11.00%
1997 14.48% 11.69% 12.72% 12.74% 21.46% 18.29% 23.41% 24.48% 9.34% 7.30% 7.02% 8.65%
1998 -4.41% 2.60% 7.77% 8.76% 17.18% 6.02% 15.98% 11.09% -8.16% -16.62% -10.29% 1.24%
1999 16.04% 16.96% 14.41% 7.47% 47.23% 59.31% 44.22% 30.63% 12.11% 8.90% 7.38% 8.74%
2000 25.64% 5.34% 14.50% 11.31% 2.08% 1.99% 9.09% 13.62% 6.29% -1.99% 4.78% -1.38%
2001 14.58% 7.73% 13.37% 5.19% -3.65% -6.57% 0.40% 5.13% 8.04% 5.45% 4.81% -4.08%
2002 to September -0.61% 2.39% 4.73% 3.36% -2.98% -10.02% -7.62% -9.89% 7.37% 4.11% 8.95% 1.52%
Jul-02 -1.55% -2.42% -1.33% -1.02% -2.95% -3.53% -4.02% -5.60% 1.08% 1.87% 1.68% -0.70%
Aug-02 0.60% 0.84% 0.63% 0.33% 1.01% 0.30% 0.19% -0.48% 1.23% 0.38% 0.85% 0.69%
Sep-02 1.37% 1.31% 1.37% 0.53% -0.47% -2.45% -2.29% -2.63% -1.14% -2.92% 0.85% 1.35%
Annualized Return 11.94% 8.82% 12.12% 8.39% 13.44% 11.55% 14.83% 13.56% 7.30% 2.99% 4.89% 3.66%
Standard Deviation 4.92% 5.45% 3.19% 3.53% 12.64% 13.10% 10.87% 11.25% 4.20% 5.61% 4.70% 4.57%
Sharpe Ratio 1.51 0.79 2.37 1.09 0.70 0.54 0.95 0.80 0.66 -0.28 0.08 -0.19
Maximum Drawdown -12.03% -8.53% -4.69% -2.42% -15.04% -22.65% -11.24% -12.55% -12.48% -20.65% -14.42% -9.61%
Corr. with S&P 500 0.13 0.22 0.35 0.38 0.59 0.62 0.70 0.71 0.03 0.12 -0.13 0.16
Corr. with Lehman Bond -0.06 -0.10 -0.08 0.15 0.00 -0.09 -0.08 -0.08 -0.07 -0.22 -0.12 -0.31
% of Winning Months 87.65% 82.72% 90.12% 76.54% 62.96% 60.49% 65.43% 65.43% 85.19% 77.78% 79.01% 64.20%
Average Gain 1.36% 1.25% 1.17% 1.10% 3.08% 3.21% 2.88% 2.91% 0.96% 0.92% 0.89% 1.03%
% of Losing Months 12.35% 17.28% 9.88% 23.46% 37.04% 39.51% 34.57% 34.57% 14.81% 22.22% 20.99% 35.80%
Average Loss -1.93% -1.80% -0.91% -0.68% -2.21% -2.42% -1.96% -2.28% -1.49% -2.07% -1.39% -0.99%
CISDMHedge Fund Subindices: Comparative Performance Analysis
September 2002
Last Three Months
Performance: January-96 - September-02
76
Appendix
CSFB HFR CSFB EACM HFR CISDM Passive HFR CISDM Passive EACM EACM EACM CSFB
Emerging Emerging Event Event Event Event Merger Merger Arbitrage Discretionary Systematic Managed Futures
Yearly Return Markets Markets Driven Driven Driven Driven Arbitrage Arbitrage
1996 34.50% 27.14% 23.06% 15.59% 24.84% 19.54% 16.61% 13.58% 14.46% 24.47% 16.75% 11.97%
1997 26.59% 16.57% 19.96% 13.72% 21.23% 25.95% 16.44% 19.44% 12.03% 23.50% 11.04% 3.12%
1998 -37.66% -32.96% -4.87% 3.18% 1.70% 8.05% 7.23% 14.31% 5.25% -11.73% 18.48% 20.64%
1999 44.82% 55.86% 22.26% 16.39% 24.33% 15.00% 14.34% 13.48% 14.24% 15.14% -5.95% -4.69%
2000 -5.52% -10.71% 7.26% 12.96% 6.74% 1.21% 18.02% 11.19% 14.84% 3.92% 8.14% 4.24%
2001 5.84% 10.36% 11.50% 6.96% 12.18% 15.88% 2.76% 4.93% 0.24% 5.74% 2.42% 1.90%
2002 to September 3.10% -1.41% -3.13% 0.08% -7.17% -5.42% -2.62% -5.78% -4.06% -1.96% 19.65% 20.63%
Jul-02 -1.19% -4.95% -3.10% -1.88% -4.17% -5.23% -2.36% -3.24% -2.06% -2.23% 3.29% 6.12%
Aug-02 1.26% 1.59% 0.27% 0.69% 0.44% 0.64% 0.37% 0.35% 0.83% -0.45% 2.38% 3.36%
Sep-02 -1.98% -4.26% -0.20% -0.31% -1.14% -2.36% 0.05% -2.01% -0.39% -0.27% 2.57% 4.11%
Annualized Return 7.06% 6.24% 10.72% 10.05% 11.83% 11.42% 10.54% 10.27% 8.20% 8.02% 10.10% 8.19%
Standard Deviation 18.12% 17.42% 6.82% 5.01% 7.38% 7.76% 4.24% 3.65% 4.78% 9.64% 12.80% 11.70%
Sharpe Ratio 0.14 0.10 0.91 1.10 0.99 0.89 1.42 1.57 0.77 0.36 0.43 0.31
Maximum Drawdown -45.14% -43.37% -16.05% -9.49% -10.78% -9.73% -6.32% -7.51% -7.86% -19.47% -15.06% -14.23%
Corr. with S&P 500 0.56 0.61 0.58 0.55 0.66 0.71 0.52 0.50 0.55 0.54 -0.05 -0.20
Corr. with Lehman Bond -0.15 -0.20 -0.14 -0.16 -0.14 -0.08 -0.15 -0.14 -0.14 0.06 0.46 0.52
% of Winning Months 56.79% 61.73% 82.72% 83.95% 74.07% 67.90% 85.19% 83.95% 81.48% 65.43% 56.79% 56.79%
Average Gain 4.12% 3.65% 1.45% 1.24% 1.87% 2.06% 1.23% 1.18% 1.15% 1.91% 3.25% 2.91%
% of Losing Months 43.21% 38.27% 17.28% 16.05% 25.93% 32.10% 14.81% 16.05% 18.52% 34.57% 43.21% 43.21%
Average Loss -3.77% -4.23% -1.91% -1.41% -1.65% -1.47% -1.37% -1.05% -1.43% -1.64% -2.25% -2.17%
Last Three Months
Performance: January-96 - September-02
77
Appendix
CSFB EACM HFR CISDM Passive CSFB HFR EACM CISDM
Equity Mkt Long/Short Equity Market Equity Market Global Macro Macro Global Asset Passive
Yearly Return Neutral Equity Neutral Neutral Allocators Macro
1996 16.60% 12.77% 14.20% 10.70% 25.58% 9.32% 20.72% 10.94%
1997 14.83% 9.38% 13.62% 12.54% 37.11% 18.82% 17.19% 20.72%
1998 13.31% 2.98% 8.30% 11.78% -3.64% 6.19% 3.37% 8.68%
1999 15.33% 2.51% 7.09% 14.17% 5.81% 17.62% 4.25% 5.90%
2000 14.99% 4.45% 14.56% 7.83% 11.67% 1.97% 6.14% 4.41%
2001 9.31% 5.07% 6.71% 5.11% 18.38% 6.87% 4.22% 13.40%
2002 to September 5.78% 6.81% 3.08% 2.51% 11.52% 7.37% 8.52% 1.99%
Jul-02 1.84% 0.06% 0.17% -0.94% 2.15% 0.25% 0.53% -1.66%
Aug-02 0.57% 0.41% 0.72% 0.23% 1.22% 0.79% 0.96% 0.91%
Sep-02 -0.03% 0.35% 0.04% 0.44% 0.76% 2.48% 1.15% 0.32%
Annualized Return 13.32% 6.46% 9.94% 9.52% 15.13% 9.96% 9.37% 9.64%
Standard Deviation 2.99% 2.83% 3.51% 2.63% 13.25% 7.56% 8.45% 7.57%
Sharpe Ratio 2.94 0.68 1.54 1.89 0.80 0.72 57.14% 0.67
Maximum Drawdown -1.15% -3.95% -2.72% -2.35% -26.79% -7.32% -5.76% -9.28%
Corr. with S&P 500 0.57 -0.07 0.15 0.08 0.25 0.40 0.27 0.73
Corr. with Lehman Bond 0.03 0.13 0.18 0.31 0.27 0.21 0.38 0.24
% of Winning Months 88.89% 80.25% 86.42% 90.12% 69.14% 62.96% 58.02% 65.43%
Average Gain 1.23% 0.82% 1.05% 0.94% 3.14% 2.03% 2.30% 2.06%
% of Losing Months 11.11% 19.75% 13.58% 9.88% 30.86% 37.04% 41.98% 34.57%
Average Loss -0.41% -0.68% -0.82% -0.83% -2.97% -1.24% -1.33% -1.60%
Last Three Months
Performance: January-96 - September-02