This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gerschutz MJ, Haynes ML,...
-
Upload
blaise-rich -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gerschutz MJ, Haynes ML,...
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gerschutz MJ, Haynes ML, Nixon D, Colvin JM. Strength evaluation of prosthetic check sockets, copolymer sockets, and definitive laminated sockets. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(3):405–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.05.0091
Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.05.0091JSP
Strength evaluation of prosthetic check sockets, copolymer sockets, and definitive laminated sockets Maria J. Gerschutz, PhD; Michael L. Haynes, MS;
Derek Nixon, BS; James M. Colvin, MS
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gerschutz MJ, Haynes ML, Nixon D, Colvin JM. Strength evaluation of prosthetic check sockets, copolymer sockets, and definitive laminated sockets. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(3):405–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.05.0091
Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.05.0091JSP
• Aim– Assess static failure loads for check sockets (CSs),
copolymer sockets (CPs), and definitive laminated sockets (DLs).
– Compare facilities, fabrication material and methods, and socket thickness.
• Relevance– While International Organization for Standardization
(ISO) standards exist for most lower-limb prosthetic components, they do not include prosthetic sockets.
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gerschutz MJ, Haynes ML, Nixon D, Colvin JM. Strength evaluation of prosthetic check sockets, copolymer sockets, and definitive laminated sockets. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(3):405–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.05.0091
Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.05.0091JSP
Methods
• We used modified ISO 10328 to measure static failure loads of prosthetic sockets. – Compared them with
criteria set by this standard for other components.
Static socket testing configuration.
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gerschutz MJ, Haynes ML, Nixon D, Colvin JM. Strength evaluation of prosthetic check sockets, copolymer sockets, and definitive laminated sockets. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(3):405–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.05.0091
Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.05.0091JSP
Results• CS Static Strength
– Influenced by thickness, material choice, fabrication method.
• CP Static Strength– Depended on thickness,
fabrication method.
• DL Static Strength– Influenced by material
choice, fabrication method.
• Ductile loading criterion:– Most CSs and all CPs
failed in a ductile mode.
• Brittle loading criterion:– Most DLs failed in a
brittle mode.
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gerschutz MJ, Haynes ML, Nixon D, Colvin JM. Strength evaluation of prosthetic check sockets, copolymer sockets, and definitive laminated sockets. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(3):405–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.05.0091
Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.05.0091JSP
Conclusions
• Our results provide: – Foundation for understanding quality of
prosthetic sockets.
– Insight into possible routes for improving current care delivered to patients.
– Comparative basis for future technology.