The virtual past for future archaeologists Hannah Cobb and Melanie Giles University of Manchester.

24
The virtual past for future archaeologists Hannah Cobb and Melanie Giles University of Manchester

Transcript of The virtual past for future archaeologists Hannah Cobb and Melanie Giles University of Manchester.

The virtual past for future archaeologists

Hannah Cobb and Melanie Giles

University of Manchester

• Principle 2.1: To provide students with eLearning resources that are engaging and which encourage the pursuit of higher learning.

• Principle 2.3: The University will promote a blended learning model in which eLearning enhances the student experience by complementing face-to-face interactions between students and academic staff, and by supporting flexible learning and different learning styles.

• Principle 2.4: The University will promote the appropriate use of technologies for efficient and effective forms of both formative and summative assessments.

• Principle 2.7: The University will use technology to facilitate flexible approaches to learning and assessment that meet the educational needs of a diverse student population.

http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/learning/walkabout/intro1.html

RLO-CETL GLOMaker and the Altar of Pergamum tutorial

http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/hca/themes/e-learning/emi_glo

Aims

• Review and significantly enhance the provision of archaeology specific eLearning resources in the department of Archaeology at the University of Manchester

• Develop a suite of eLearning resources which will be available for teaching archaeology, or adapting for teaching history and classics at other HE institutions nation-wide.

• Undertake a pilot study to examine the efficacy of such resources in supporting learning in the undergraduate degree.

ARGY30502 Vocational Skills 3

• Level 3 Vocational Skills Course – Legislative context of archaeology and heritage– Assessed, amongst other things, by a mock DBA

(50% of assessment)

• Issues– Students felt the DBA exercise lacked relevance– Students felt under-equipped/that they lacked the

experience to produce a DBA– Key DBA resources could not be lodged in the library

To GLO or not to GLO?

• GLO Benefits– Easy to use, freely downloadable software– Multiple interpretation facility– Can be easily imported into any VLE

• GLO Limitations*– Can’t include web links/PDFs – Limited to linear navigability– Limitations in appearance

*Specific to GLO V1

• Orient– Introduction [What topic] – Learning Outcomes [What topic]– Why are DBAs relevant to me [Grab attention and Why

learn] • Understand

– What is a DBA [Apprehend]– What is the purpose of a DBA [Apprehend]– Why undertake a DBA? [Apprehend]

• Use - DBA self test 1 [Quiz] • Understand

– How to create a DBA – Data collection [Comprehend]– How to create a DBA – Writing the report [Comprehend]– How to create a DBA – What should each section

include? [Comprehend]– How to create a DBA – Assessing the significance of the

archaeology [Comprehend]– How do DBAs fit into the archaeological planning

process [Comprehend]– Who will use a completed DBA? [Apprehend]– Vox pops and transcripts giving case studies of end

users of a DBA [Comprehend]• Use - DBA self test 2 [Quiz] • Understand - Conclusion [Apprehend]

• Easy (non linear) navigability• Control over layout• Links to both resources and pages in Blackboard and

websites/ web resources outside of Blackboard

Additional DBA Resources

I used the resources on Blackboard on a regular basis

0%

0%

8%

35%

58%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Neither Agree norDisagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

The resources on Blackboard met my expectations of web provision for this

course

0%

4%

4%

42%

50%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neither Agree norDisagree

Strongly Agree

Agree

The resources on Blackboard were useful for supporting what was covered

in lectures

0%

0%

4%

42%

54%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Neither Agree norDisagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

Did you use the DBA (Desk Based Assessment) online tutorial?

73%

27%

Yes

No

Positive feedback from the DBA tutorial resource

• 58% strongly agreed and 42% agreed it was clear and easy to follow

• 56% strongly agreed and 33% agreed it had the right amount of links to supporting documents or websites

• 79% of students used it more than once

I found the vox pops/recordings of who might use a DBA useful

5% 5%

11%

37%

42%

Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree

I used the associated quizzes to test my knowledge from the online tutorial

21%

11%

26%

21%

21%

Agree Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree

What were the least useful aspects of the DBA resources?

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Emphasis on historic archaeology

Generic Blackboard resources

Lack of help on DBA tutorial

Only 1 tutorial

Repetition

Some resources didn't load

The lectures

Too many of the same articles

Too much to print

Too much information to absorb

Nothing - it was all useful

What were the most useful aspects of the DBA resources?

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Clarity of resources

Clarity of tone used

Ease of use/navigability 3

Generic Blackboard Facilities

Quizzes

Ease of access

Resources were all online/all in one place

The range of information/resources

The Online Tutorial

Links to other websites

Example DBA

Maps

The available literature

I will use the skills I learnt from the Online tutorial in my future career

32%

5%

26%

26%

11%

Agree Disagree

Neither Agree nor Disagree Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Conclusions

• Pilot study demonstrates eLearning resources can significantly enhance student understanding of key subjects

• GLO software provides a useful tool for considering pedagogical patterns - although various advantages of making an RLO outside of the GLOmaker

• Some areas to smooth out in future delivery (e.g. streamlining of tutorial/information available)

• Future online availability of the tutorial resource planned for Autumn 2009

Contact:

[email protected]

[email protected]

With thanks to:

The HEA History, Classics and Archaeology Subject Centre, The University of Manchester