The shift and the shocks Martin Wolf, Associate Editor & Chief Economics Commentator, Financial...
-
Upload
liliana-goodman -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of The shift and the shocks Martin Wolf, Associate Editor & Chief Economics Commentator, Financial...
The shift and the shocksMartin Wolf, Associate Editor & Chief Economics Commentator, Financial Times
Leverhulme Globalisation Lecture Series
28th March 2012
Nottingham
2
The shift and the shocks
3
The shift and the shocks
• Shift
• Shocks
• Prospects
4
1. The shift
• The 19th century saw the “great divergence”
• The second half of the 20th century saw the beginning of convergence, with Japan and the east Asian “tiger economies”
• The late 20th and early 21st centuries saw convergence spread to the Asian giants
• Divergent growth is a mirror image of converging incomes
5
1. The shift
EMERGING COUNTRIES OUTPERFORM HUGELY
GDP GROWTH RATES IN THE WORLD ECONOMY(10-year moving average, end year)
012345
678
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
World Advanced economies Emerging and developing economies
Source: IMF WEO, September 2011
6
1. The shift
EMERGING COUNTRIES OUTPERFORM HUGELY
GDP SINCE THE CRISIS
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Advanced economies Latin America and the CaribbeanSub-Saharan Africa ChinaIndia Central and eastern EuropeDeveloping Asia
Source: IMF, WEO database
7
1. The shift
• The shift helped cause the shocks, via:
– A “labour-supply shock”, which lowered relative wages of the relatively unskilled in high-income countries and encouraged household borrowing;
– A “dis-inflationary shock”, as China lowered world prices for manufactures, which encouraged loose monetary policy;
– Finally, an “inflationary shock”, as demand for raw materials soared, which made it more difficult to manage the crisis;
– Above all, a “savings shock”, which lowered the real rate of interest and caused a huge rise in global imbalances.
8
2. The shift
REAL INTEREST RATES
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Jan-1985 Jan-1987 Jan-1989 Jan-1991 Jan-1993 Jan-1995 Jan-1997 Jan-1999 Jan-2001 Jan-2003 Jan-2005 Jan-2007 Jan-2009 Jan-2011
UK INDEX-LINKED US TIPS
Asian financial crisis
Western financial crisis
THE SAVINGS GLUT?
9
1. The shift
RISE OF IMBALANCES
GLOBAL CURRENT ACCOUNT IMBALANCES(as per cent of world GDP)
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Germany and Japan China and emerging Asia Peripheral Europe Rest of World Oil Exporters US
Source: WEO, October 2011
10
1. The shift
RISE OF FOREIGN CURRENCY RESERVES
GLOBAL FOREIGN CURRENCY RESERVES ($bn)
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
Jan-
97
Jan-
98
Jan-
99
Jan-
00
Jan-
01
Jan-
02
Jan-
03
Jan-
04
Jan-
05
Jan-
06
Jan-
07
Jan-
08
Jan-
09
Jan-
10
Jan-
11
China Rest of developing Asia Rest of developing countries Industrial countries
11
2. The shocks
• The economic collapse was large and enduring
• The rescue was also dramatic:
– Liabilities of core financial system were nationalised;
– Fiscal policy put on a war-time footing; and
– Monetary policy extraordinarily aggressive;
• We are now living in a “contained depression”. There are big risks with this, but it is better than the alternative
• According to Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff, This Time is Different, it could take another three years, to return to “normality”. Given the scale of affected economies, it could be far longer.
12
2. The shocks: global
THE LONG SLUMPGDP IN THE "GREAT RECESSION"
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
Q108
Q208
Q308
Q408
Q109
Q209
Q309
Q409
Q110
Q210
Q310
Q410
Q111
Q211
Q311
Q411
US Japan Germany France Italy UK
13
2. The shocks: global
THE LEVERAGE CYCLE
DEBT OVER GDP(per cent, Q2 2011)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Japa
nUK
Spain
Franc
eIta
ly
South
Kor
ea US
Ger
man
y
Austra
lia
Canad
a
Households Non-financial Corporations
Financial Institutions Government
Source: McKinsey Global Institute 2012
14
2. The shocks: global
THE US LEVERAGE CYCLE
TOTAL DOMESTIC BORROWING(as per cent of GDP)
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
I
2011
III
Households Non-financial Business Domestic Financial Sectors
Total Government Total Domestic
15
2. The shocks: global
THE US LEVERAGE CYCLE
SECTORAL RATIOS OF US DEBT TO GDP
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
140.0%
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
Households Non-financial Business All Government Financial Sectors
16
2. The shocks: global
MONETARY EXPANSIONCENTRAL BANK INTERVENTION RATES
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
31
/12
/20
04
30
/04
/20
05
31
/08
/20
05
31
/12
/20
05
30
/04
/20
06
31
/08
/20
06
31
/12
/20
06
30
/04
/20
07
31
/08
/20
07
31
/12
/20
07
30
/04
/20
08
31
/08
/20
08
31
/12
/20
08
30
/04
/20
09
31
/08
/20
09
31
/12
/20
09
30
/04
/20
10
31
/08
/20
10
31
/12
/20
10
30
/04
/20
11
31
/08
/20
11
31
/12
/20
11
US FEDERAL FUNDS UK BANK RATE ECB SHORT TERM REPO JAPAN TARGET RATE
17
2. The shocks: global
UK BASE RATE SINCE THE 19TH CENTURY
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
Oct
-94
Oct
-07
Oct
-20
Oct
-33
Oct
-46
Oct
-59
Oct
-72
Oct
-85
Oct
-98
Oct
-11
Oct
-24
Oct
-37
Oct
-50
Oct
-63
Oct
-76
Oct
-89
Oct
-02
Oct
-15
Oct
-28
Oct
-41
Oct
-54
Oct
-67
Oct
-80
Oct
-93
Oct
-06
THE ARRIVAL OF ULTRA-CHEAP MONEY
18
2. The shocks: global
THE SOVEREIGN DEBT IMPACT
NET PUBLIC DEBT OVER GDP (per cent)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Japan Italy United States France United Kingdom Germany Canada
2006
2009
2012
2015
Source: IMF WEO, October 2011
19
2. The shocks: global
FISCAL ROOM? YES - FOR SOME10-YEAR GOVERNMENT BOND YIELDS
(per cent)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
05/0
1/20
07
05/0
4/20
07
05/0
7/20
07
05/1
0/20
07
05/0
1/20
08
05/0
4/20
08
05/0
7/20
08
05/1
0/20
08
05/0
1/20
09
05/0
4/20
09
05/0
7/20
09
05/1
0/20
09
05/0
1/20
10
05/0
4/20
10
05/0
7/20
10
05/1
0/20
10
05/0
1/20
11
05/0
4/20
11
05/0
7/20
11
05/1
0/20
11
05/0
1/20
12
Germany France US Japan UK
20
2. The shocks - eurozone
• The core of the eurozone financial crisis is not fiscal
• The fiscal crisis is more a symptom of the financial crisis than a cause of that crisis
• The crisis is largely the result of divergences accumulated in the years of excess: what made everything seem so good was in fact creating an acute long-term crisis
• External imbalances played a bigger role than fiscal imbalances: it mattered less whether the private or public sectors were being financed than how big the external finance was
21
2. The shocks - eurozone
THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLYCURRENT ACCOUNT IMBALANCES IN THE EUROZONE
(as a share of eurozone GDP)
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
France Germany Greece & Portugal Italy Netherlands Spain Rest Total
Source: IMF WEO Database October 2011
22
2. The shocks - eurozone
LOST COMPETITIVENESSUNIT LABOUR COSTS IN MANUFACTURING
RELATIVE TO GERMANY
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Q1-1999
Q1-2000
Q1-2001
Q1-2002
Q1-2003
Q1-2004
Q1-2005
Q1-2006
Q1-2007
Q1-2008
Q1-2009
Q1-2010
Q1-2011
Portugal Italy Ireland Greece Spain
Source: OECD
23
2. The shocks - eurozone
ROAD TO THE EUROZONE FISCAL CRISES
NET PUBLIC DEBT(relative to GDP)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Greece Italy Portugal Ireland Spain
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2015
Source: World Economic Outlook database April 2011
24
2. The shocks - eurozone
ROAD TO THE EUROZONE FISCAL CRISES
10-YEAR SPREAD OVER BUNDS(percentage points)
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
01
/01
/20
07
01
/04
/20
07
01
/07
/20
07
01
/10
/20
07
01
/01
/20
08
01
/04
/20
08
01
/07
/20
08
01
/10
/20
08
01
/01
/20
09
01
/04
/20
09
01
/07
/20
09
01
/10
/20
09
01
/01
/20
10
01
/04
/20
10
01
/07
/20
10
01
/10
/20
10
01
/01
/20
11
01
/04
/20
11
01
/07
/20
11
01
/10
/20
11
01
/01
/20
12
Portugal Ireland Greece
25
2. The shocks - eurozone
TRIUMPH OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
10-YEAR SPREAD OVER BUNDS(percentage points)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
01
/01
/20
07
01
/04
/20
07
01
/07
/20
07
01
/10
/20
07
01
/01
/20
08
01
/04
/20
08
01
/07
/20
08
01
/10
/20
08
01
/01
/20
09
01
/04
/20
09
01
/07
/20
09
01
/10
/20
09
01
/01
/20
10
01
/04
/20
10
01
/07
/20
10
01
/10
/20
10
01
/01
/20
11
01
/04
/20
11
01
/07
/20
11
01
/10
/20
11
01
/01
/20
12
Italy Spain Belgium France
26
2. The shocks - eurozone
TRIUMPH OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
SPANISH BANK AND SOVEREIGN CDS SPREADS
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
01
/08
/20
08
01
/10
/20
08
01
/12
/20
08
01
/02
/20
09
01
/04
/20
09
01
/06
/20
09
01
/08
/20
09
01
/10
/20
09
01
/12
/20
09
01
/02
/20
10
01
/04
/20
10
01
/06
/20
10
01
/08
/20
10
01
/10
/20
10
01
/12
/20
10
01
/02
/20
11
01
/04
/20
11
01
/06
/20
11
01
/08
/20
11
01
/10
/20
11
01
/12
/20
11
01
/02
/20
12
Spain Santander BBVA
27
2. The shocks - eurozone
ITALIAN BANK AND SOVEREIGN CDS SPREADS
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
01
/08
/20
08
01
/10
/20
08
01
/12
/20
08
01
/02
/20
09
01
/04
/20
09
01
/06
/20
09
01
/08
/20
09
01
/10
/20
09
01
/12
/20
09
01
/02
/20
10
01
/04
/20
10
01
/06
/20
10
01
/08
/20
10
01
/10
/20
10
01
/12
/20
10
01
/02
/20
11
01
/04
/20
11
01
/06
/20
11
01
/08
/20
11
01
/10
/20
11
01
/12
/20
11
01
/02
/20
12
Italy Unicredit Intesa Sanpaolo Monte dei Paschi
TRIUMPH OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
28
3. Prospects
• At the broadest level, we are watching the interaction of two huge events:
– A secular shift in the location of economic activity; and
– The collapse of a generational expansion in private and, to a lesser extent, public sector leverage in high-income countries
– The eurozone crisis falls at the intersection of these processes
• So how might it all play out?
29
2. The prospects: global
GROWTH PROSPECTS DWINDLE FOR 2012
CONSENSUS FORECASTS FOR 2012
-2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
US
UK
Japan
Eurozone
Germany
France
Italy
Spain
Jun-11 Feb-12
30
2. The prospects: global
GROWTH PROSPECTS POOR FOR 2013
CONSENSUS FORECASTS FOR 2013(February 2012)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
US
UK
Japan
Eurozone
Germany
France
Italy
Spain
31
2. The prospects: global
GROWTH PROSPECTS DWINDLE FOR 2012
CONSENSUS FORECASTS FOR 2012
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
China
India
Asia Pacific (NB excluding Japan)
Russia
Eastern Europe
Brazil
Latin America
World
Jun-11 Feb-12
32
2. The prospects: global
GROWTH PROSPECTS DWINDLE FOR 2012
CONSENSUS FORECASTS FOR 2013 (February 2012)
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
China
India
Asia Pacific (NB excluding Japan)
Russia
Eastern Europe
Brazil
Latin America
World
33
3. Prospects: global
• Here are salient elements of global challenges :
– Accelerating de-leveraging in the private sectors of overleveraged countries;
– Rebalancing the world economy, to give over-leveraged economies export-led growth;
– Reducing fiscal deficits in high-income countries, without killing the recovery; and
– Avoiding excesses in emerging countries, despite the easy financial and monetary conditions.
34
3. Prospects: eurozone
• Here are salient elements of eurozone challenges :
– Financing with adjustment, which will take at least 5 years and possibly 10 years;
– By “adjustment”, I mean structural reforms and divergent inflation across the eurozone, with high inflation in core countries;
– The big danger is premature fiscal tightening in the periphery together with absence of adjustment in the core, which would generate prolonged recessions;
– And risks a collapse in political support for the project.
35
3. Prospects
• Some guesses about the future:
– The US will be much the most dynamic of big economies;
– Growth in high-income countries will remain weak;
– Inflation will remain contained;
– Short-term official interest rates will remain low;
– Countries with their own central banks will have low long-term bond rates; many eurozone countries will not;
– Eurozone break-up risk is significant;
– Emerging countries should continue to grow quickly, but there is a chance of crises there, too, now that finance is flowing towards them.