The Relationship Between Foreign Exchange Risk Management ...
The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania
description
Transcript of The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania
![Page 1: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania
MSc Student: Stoian Adrian
Supervisor: Professor Moisă Altăr
Academy of Economic Studies
Doctoral School of Finance and Banking
Bucharest, July 2008
![Page 2: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Contents
1. Introduction
2. The goal of this paper
3. Literature review
4. Methodology
5. The data
6. Results
7. Conclusions
![Page 3: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1. Introduction
1.1 The effect of FDI on growth almost generally accepted as a positive one
Studies: Alfaro et. al (2004); Basu et. al (2003);
Fedderke and Romm (2006).
1.2 Some controversy brought forth by other studies:
Gorg and Greenway (2004); Atiken and Harrison (1999).
![Page 4: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2. The goal of this paper
• To determine whether the is a cointegrating relationship
between FDI and economic growth in the Romanian
economy
• To determine the type of this relation (in case it exists)
• What is the direction of causality between the two
variables
![Page 5: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
3. Literature review (I)
• Cross-country studies: Blomstrom (1994);
Borensztein (1998);• Panel studies: Carkovic and Levine (2005);
Nair-Reichert and Weinhold (2001);• Panel cointegration studies: Basu (2003);• Time series studies for individual
countries: Ramirez (2000); Cuadros (2004);
Fedderke and Romm (2006).
![Page 6: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
3. Literature review (II)
Problems associated with these types of studies:•Cross-country studies: the assumption of identical production functions across countries;•Panel studies: the imposition of homogeneity on the coefficients of the lagged dependent variables;•Panel cointegration studies: still the heterogeneity problem;•Time series studies for individual countries: the use of only one cointegration test
![Page 7: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
4. Methodology
1. Cointegration analysis: • The Engle-Granger procedure• The ECM test• The Johansen method• The Gregory-Hansen procedure
2. The Phillips-Loretan model
3. Granger causality test.
![Page 8: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
5. Data (1)
Variables considered:
• The logarithm of the real gross domestic product: LogGDP
• The foreign direct investment to GDP ration: FDI/GDP
![Page 9: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
5. Data (2)
The gross domestic product The FDI/GDP ratio
9000
10000
11000
12000
13000
14000
15000
16000
17000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
GDP_SA
.00
.05
.10
.15
.20
.25
.30
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
FG
![Page 10: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
5. Data (3)
Table 1The ADF test statistic for GDP and FDI in Romania between 2000 and 2008Q1
GDP FDI
t-statistic2.17
Prob.0.99
t-statistic-1.52
Prob.0.50
Table 2The Phillips-Perron test statistic for GDP and FDI-to-GDP ratio in Romania between 2000 and 2008Q1
GDP FDI
t-statistic1.26
Prob.0.99
t-statistic-2.41
Prob.0.14
![Page 11: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Engle Granger procedure:
The ADF test for the residuals based on:
5. Results (1)
( / ) , 1,2,...,t t t tLogGDP c FDI GDP e t T
11
ˆˆ ˆk
t t j t j tj
e e e v
![Page 12: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
5. Results (2)
Table 3Cointegration: the Engle-Granger procedure
ADF-statistic 1% (5%) [10%] critical values
-3.31 -3.64 (-2.95) [-2.61]
![Page 13: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
5. Results (3)
The ECM test for cointegration
The null of no cointegration is b3=0
2
1 2 3 1 4 1 11
2
0
( / )
( / )
t t t i ti
i t i ti
LGDP b b t b LGDP b FDI GDP LGDP
FDI GDP u
![Page 14: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
5. Results (4)
Table 4Cointegration: the ECM procedure
ECM-t-statistic 1% (5%) critical values*
-4.66 -4.60 (-3.84)
*Critical values are taken from MacKinnon (1991)
![Page 15: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
5. Results (5)
The Johansen test
Table 5Cointegration: the Johansen test
– trace statistic 5% critical value
30.14 25.87
λ
![Page 16: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
5. Results (6)
The Gregory-Hansen procedure•Based on the use of three single equation models
Model 1: The level shift model (C):
Model 2: The slope change model (C/T):
1 1 2 2T
t t t ty y e
1 1 2 2T
t t t ty t y e
![Page 17: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
4. Results (7)
Model 3: The regime shift model (C/S)
where and
The decision of the Gregory-Hansen procedure
1 1 2 1 2 2 2T T
t t t t t ty y y e
1 2 ( / )t t t ty LogGDP y FDI GDP
0, [ ]
1, [ ]t
if t
if t
* inf ( )T
ADF ADF
![Page 18: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
5. Results (8)
The values of the ADF test for Model C
-4.0
-3.5
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
ADF_REZIDUURI_M1
Table 6Cointegration: the Gregory-Hansen procedure: Model C
ADF* – statistic 1% (5%) critical values
-3.65 -5.13 (-4.61)
Critical values are taken from Gregory and Hansen (1996)
![Page 19: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
5. Results (9)
The values of the ADF test for Model 2
-6.4
-6.0
-5.6
-5.2
-4.8
-4.4
-4.0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
ADF_REZIDUURI_M2
Table 7Cointegration: the Gregory-Hansen procedure: Model C/T
ADF* – statistic 1% (5%) critical values
-6.12 -5.45 (-4.99)
Critical values are taken from Gregory and Hansen (1996)
![Page 20: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
5. Results (10)
Estimating the type of long-run relationship
The Phillips-Loretan single equation ECM
1 2 2, 1, 2,1 1
' ( ' )k l
t t j t j j t j t j tj j
y y b y y y v
![Page 21: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
5. Results (11)
The first Phillips Loretan equation
where and
1 1' ( ' )
( / )
t t t t
i k
i t i t i ti k
LogGDP y b LogGDP y
FDI GDP
1
/tt t
t
ty
FDI GDP
c
![Page 22: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
5. Results (12)
Table 8The type of long-run relationship: Phillips and Loretan nonlinear least squares (NLS)
Coefficients of 𝛌 – the independent variable
9.18 (1606) 0.0114 (12.66) 0.50 (0.007) -0.0003 (-0.031)
The numbers in parentheses are the corresponding t-Statistic values
c
![Page 23: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
5. Results (13)
The second Phillips Loretan equation
where and
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
/ ' ( / ' )t t t t t t
j k
i t j tj k
FDI GDP y b FDI GDP y
LogGDP
1
1
tt
t
ty
LogGDP
1
11
1
1
c
![Page 24: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
5. Results (14)
Table 9The type of long-run relationship: Phillips and Loretan nonlinear least squares (NLS)
Coefficients of 𝛌1 – the independent variable
-21.01 (-5.27) -0.028 (-4.31) 2.00 (5.26)
The numbers in parentheses are the corresponding t-Statistic values
1c 1δ 1β
![Page 25: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
5. Results (15)
Causality testing
where
111 1
11 22 2( / ) ( / )
pt k t
k tkt t t k t k t
LogGDP LogGDP aec
FDI GDP FDI GDP a
1 1 1ˆ ˆˆ/t t t tec FDI GDP c LogGDP
![Page 26: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
5. Results (16)
Table 10Long-run Granger causality test
t-Value for a1 (LogGDPt) t-Value for a2 (FDIt/GDPt) Conclusion
-1.02576 7.60007* FDIt/GDPt LogGDPt
*denotes the 1% level of significance
![Page 27: The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Romania](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56815b80550346895dc97cda/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
6. Conclusions1. The relationship between FDI and economic growth
• The two variables considered in the analysis are cointegrated
• The relationship between the two variables is a positive one
• Causality runs from FDI to economic growth
2. Suggestions for future studies:
• Periodically redo the time series analysis to determine whether the small
share of FDI in the first part of the analyzed period is the cause for not
finding an impact of FDI on growth
• Identify what types of FDI promote growth