The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 ( 2 + (f 0 2 / ) 2...

15
The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 ( 2 + (f 0 2 /) 2 /∂p 2 ) = (-f 0 /) /p{-v g p ( g + f)} + (-R/p) 2 p {v g p T} + (-R/p) 2 p {1/C p (dQ/dt)} + (-f 0 /) /p{k x F}

Transcript of The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 ( 2 + (f 0 2 / ) 2...

Page 1: The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 (  2 + (f 0 2 /  )  2 /∂p 2 )  = (-f 0 /  )  /  p{-v g  p (  g + f)}

The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14

(2 + (f02 /)2/∂p2) =

(-f0 /) /p{-vgp(g + f)}

+ (-R/p) 2p{vg pT}

+ (-R/p) 2p{1/Cp (dQ/dt)}

+ (-f0 /) /p{k x F}

Page 2: The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 (  2 + (f 0 2 /  )  2 /∂p 2 )  = (-f 0 /  )  /  p{-v g  p (  g + f)}

Where

= - (RT/p)(ln/p) (4.3.6)

Page 3: The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 (  2 + (f 0 2 /  )  2 /∂p 2 )  = (-f 0 /  )  /  p{-v g  p (  g + f)}

Consider the following form of omega forced by friction:

F = (f0 /K) /p{k x F}

Page 4: The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 (  2 + (f 0 2 /  )  2 /∂p 2 )  = (-f 0 /  )  /  p{-v g  p (  g + f)}

Now, consider that the friction force, F, is proportional to, and opposite in direction from, the

1000-mb geostrophic wind:

F = -(p) V1000

Page 5: The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 (  2 + (f 0 2 /  )  2 /∂p 2 )  = (-f 0 /  )  /  p{-v g  p (  g + f)}

Therefore,

F = -(f0 /K) /p{(p) k x V1000}

= -{(f0 1000)/ (K)} (/p)

Page 6: The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 (  2 + (f 0 2 /  )  2 /∂p 2 )  = (-f 0 /  )  /  p{-v g  p (  g + f)}

Physically, we assume that (p) is a maximum at the ground and vanishes

near the tropopause

Therefore, /p) is greater than zero, and F represents ascent or descent, when

1000 is cyclonic or anticyclonic, respectively.

Page 7: The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 (  2 + (f 0 2 /  )  2 /∂p 2 )  = (-f 0 /  )  /  p{-v g  p (  g + f)}

Consider that when 1000 is cyclonic (positive in the N. Hemisphere), the surface friction is trying to reduce this vorticity by producing a negative vorticity change, while at the top of the troposphere (e. g., 300 mb), there would be no friction force,

and therefore no vorticity change.

Page 8: The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 (  2 + (f 0 2 /  )  2 /∂p 2 )  = (-f 0 /  )  /  p{-v g  p (  g + f)}

Therefore,

300 /t - 1000 /t > 0;

And the thermal vorticity increases

TH /t > 0;

And the tropospheric thickness decreases:

/t(z300 - z1000) < 0

Page 9: The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 (  2 + (f 0 2 /  )  2 /∂p 2 )  = (-f 0 /  )  /  p{-v g  p (  g + f)}

Since there is no temperature advection or diabatic heating, the necessary thickness decrease (tropospheric column cooling) must be accomplished by adiabatic cooling in association with ascent. The justification for the ascent is the same as for the forcing of upward increase in cyclonic vorticity advection; however, the vertical profiles are different, because of the vertical structure of friction.

Page 10: The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 (  2 + (f 0 2 /  )  2 /∂p 2 )  = (-f 0 /  )  /  p{-v g  p (  g + f)}

Thus, the only means of cooling the column is through ascent in a hydrostatically stable atmosphere

- 0 +

top

bottom

VF

- 0 +

z/t

-/t

1. The thickness is decreasing2. The heights are rising at all levels, but less so aloft3. Convergence at low levels is overwhelmed by the effect of

frictional dissipation.4. Aloft, divergence is responsible for the vorticity decreases

responsible for the vorticity increase below

Page 11: The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 (  2 + (f 0 2 /  )  2 /∂p 2 )  = (-f 0 /  )  /  p{-v g  p (  g + f)}

Thermal lows

There are often surface-based circulation systems, particularly equatorward of the middle-latitude belt of strong meridional temperature gradient and eastward-migrating cyclones and anticyclones, in which lows and highs change very little from day to day, and in which little or no geostrophic advection of temperature or vorticity is apparent.

Most prominent of such lows occur over western India, much of the Middle East, and the Sahara during the warm season. Other slightly weaker lows are found over northern Mexico, South Africa, and Australia during the respective warm seasons.

Page 12: The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 (  2 + (f 0 2 /  )  2 /∂p 2 )  = (-f 0 /  )  /  p{-v g  p (  g + f)}

Such systems are often called, ‘Thermal Lows’, because of

their cyclonic character of circulation in the lower troposphere, yet their

anticyclonic character in the upper troposphere is also just

as prominent.

Page 13: The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 (  2 + (f 0 2 /  )  2 /∂p 2 )  = (-f 0 /  )  /  p{-v g  p (  g + f)}

An example of a ‘thermal low’, showing the circulations at both the 1000- and 300-mb

levels (solid, 1000-mb isobars; dashed, 1000-300 mb thicknesses)

WarmLow1000

High300

Page 14: The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 (  2 + (f 0 2 /  )  2 /∂p 2 )  = (-f 0 /  )  /  p{-v g  p (  g + f)}

Such thermal lows are driven primarily by the intense diabatic heating of the lower troposphere by the arid ground below. The large-scale ascent associated with this heating, and due to surface friction, produces adiabatic cooling, that might act together with radiative cooling to maintain a stead-state warm core. (The radiative cooling causes a small contribution to descent, which reduces the ascent associated with other caused, but does not eliminate it)

Page 15: The quasi-geostrophic omega equation (see Bluestein, Volume I; eq. 5.6.14 (  2 + (f 0 2 /  )  2 /∂p 2 )  = (-f 0 /  )  /  p{-v g  p (  g + f)}

However, the steady-state nature of the vorticity and height change, cannot be explained on the basis of quasi-geostrophic theory.